Patent Grant
6948355
A fuel vapor pressure management apparatus and method that manages pressure and detects leaks in a fuel system. In particular, a fuel vapor pressure management apparatus and method that vents positive pressure, vents excess negative pressure, and uses evaporative natural vacuum to perform a leak diagnostic.
Conventional fuel systems for vehicles with internal combustion engines can include a canister that accumulates fuel vapor from a headspace of a fuel tank. If there is a leak in the fuel tank, the canister, or any other component of the fuel system, fuel vapor could escape through the leak and be released into the atmosphere instead of being accumulated in the canister. Various government regulatory agencies, e.g., the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Air Resources Board of the California Environmental Protection Agency, have promulgated standards related to limiting fuel vapor releases into the atmosphere. Thus, it is believed that there is a need to avoid releasing fuel vapors into the atmosphere, and to provide an apparatus and a method for performing a leak diagnostic, so as to comply with these standards.
In such conventional fuel systems, excess fuel vapor can accumulate immediately after engine shutdown, thereby creating a positive pressure in the fuel vapor pressure management system. Excess negative pressure in closed fuel systems can occur under some operating and atmospheric conditions, thereby causing stress on components of these fuel systems. Thus, it is believed that there is a need to vent, or “blow-off,” the positive pressure, and to vent, or “relieve,” the excess negative pressure. Similarly, it is also believed to be desirable to relieve excess positive pressure that can occur during tank refueling. Thus, it is believed that there is a need to allow air, but not fuel vapor, to exit the tank at high flow rates during tank refueling. This is commonly referred to as onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR).
The present invention provides a system of evaluating a leak detection test that is performed on a headspace of a fuel system. The fuel system supplies fuel to an internal combustion engine of a vehicle. The system includes a fuel vapor pressure management apparatus and a processor. The fuel vapor pressure management apparatus includes a housing that defines an interior chamber, a pressure operable device that separates the interior chamber into first and second portions, and a sensor that detects the first arrangement of the pressure operable device during the leak detection test. The pressure operable device includes a poppet that is movable along an axis, and a seal that is adapted to cooperatively engage the poppet. The first arrangement of the pressure operable device occurs during the leak detection test when there is a first negative pressure level in the first portion relative to the second portion and the seal is in a first deformed configuration. A second arrangement of the pressure operable device permits a first fluid flow from the second portion to the first portion when the seal is in a second deformed configuration. And a third arrangement of the pressure operable device permits a second fluid flow from the first portion to the second portion when the seal is in an undeformed configuration. The processor calculates an in-use rate value by dividing a number of monitoring events by a number of driving events of the vehicle, and compares the in-use rate value to a standard value. The number of monitoring events is based on the sensor detecting the first arrangement.
The present invention also provides a method of evaluating a leak detection test performed on a headspace of a fuel system. The fuel system supplies fuel to an internal combustion engine of a vehicle. The method includes performing the leak detection test with a fuel vapor pressure management apparatus, calculating an in-use rate equal to a number of monitoring events divided by a number of driving events, and comparing the calculated in-use rate to a standard value. The fuel vapor pressure management apparatus includes a housing that defines an interior chamber, a pressure operable device that separates the interior chamber into first and second portions, and a sensor. The pressure operable device includes a poppet that moves along an axis, and a seal that is adapted to cooperatively engage the poppet. A first arrangement of the pressure operable device occurs during the leak detection test when there is a first negative pressure level in the first portion relative to the second portion and the seal is in a first deformed configuration. A second arrangement of the pressure operable device permits a first fluid flow from the second portion to the first portion when the seal is in a second deformed configuration. And a third arrangement of the pressure operable device permits a second fluid flow from the first portion to the second portion when the seal is in an undeformed configuration. The sensor detects the first arrangement of the pressure operable device during the leak detection test.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain features of the invention.
As it is used in this description, “atmosphere” generally refers to the gaseous envelope surrounding the Earth, and “atmospheric” generally refers to a characteristic of this envelope.
As it is used in this description, “pressure” is measured relative to the ambient atmospheric pressure. Thus, positive pressure refers to pressure greater than the ambient atmospheric pressure and negative pressure, or “vacuum,” refers to pressure less than the ambient atmospheric pressure.
Also, as it is used in this description, “headspace” refers to the variable volume within an enclosure, e.g. a fuel tank, that is above the surface of the liquid, e.g., fuel, in the enclosure. In the case of a fuel tank for volatile fuels, e.g., gasoline, vapors from the volatile fuel may be present in the headspace of the fuel tank.
Referring to
The fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20 performs a plurality of functions including signaling 22 that a first predetermined pressure (vacuum) level exists, “vacuum relief” or relieving negative pressure 24 at a value below the first predetermined pressure level, and “pressure blow-off” or relieving positive pressure 26 above a second pressure level.
Other functions are also possible. For example, the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20 can be used as a vacuum regulator, and in connection with the operation of the purge valve 16 and an algorithm, can perform large leak detection on the fuel system 10. Such large leak detection could be used to evaluate situations such as when a refueling cap 12a is not replaced on the fuel tank 12.
It is understood that volatile liquid fuels, e.g., gasoline, can evaporate under certain conditions, e.g., rising ambient temperature, thereby generating fuel vapor. In the course of cooling that is experienced by the fuel system 10, e.g., after the engine is turned off, a vacuum is naturally created by cooling the fuel vapor and air, such as in the headspace of the fuel tank 12 and in the charcoal canister 18. According to the present description, the existence of a vacuum at the first predetermined pressure level indicates that the integrity of the fuel system 10 is satisfactory. Thus, signaling 22 is used to indicate the integrity of the fuel system 10, i.e., that there are no appreciable leaks. Subsequently, the vacuum relief 24 at a pressure level below the first predetermined pressure level can protect the fuel tank 12, e.g., can prevent structural distortion as a result of stress caused by vacuum in the fuel system 10.
After the engine is turned off, the pressure blow-off 26 allows excess pressure due to fuel evaporation to be vented, and thereby expedite the occurrence of vacuum generation that subsequently occurs during cooling. The pressure blow-off 26 allows air within the fuel system 10 to be released while fuel vapor is retained. Similarly, in the course of refueling the fuel tank 12, the pressure blow-off 26 allows air to exit the fuel tank 12 at a high rate of flow.
At least two advantages are achieved in accordance with a system including the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20. First, a leak detection diagnostic can be performed on fuel tanks of all sizes. This advantage is significant in that previous systems for detecting leaks were not effective with known large volume fuel tanks, e.g., 100 gallons or more. Second, the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20 is compatible with a number of different types of the purge valve, including digital and proportional purge valves.
The housing 30 defines an interior chamber 31 and can be an assembly of a first housing part 30a and a second housing part 30b. The first housing part 30a includes a first port 36 that provides fluid communication between the charcoal canister 18 and the interior chamber 31. The second housing part 30b includes a second port 38 that provides fluid communication, e.g., venting, between the interior chamber 31 and the ambient atmosphere. A filter (not shown) can be interposed between the second port 38 and the ambient atmosphere for reducing contaminants that could be drawn into the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20 during the vacuum relief 24 or during operation of the purge valve 16.
In general, it is desirable to minimize the number of housing parts to reduce the number of potential leak points, i.e., between housing pieces, which must be sealed.
An advantage of the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20 is its compact size. The volume occupied by the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20, including the interior chamber 31, is less than all other known leak detection devices, the smallest of which occupies more than 240 cubic centimeters. That is to say, the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20, from the first port 36 to the second port 38 and including the interior chamber 31, occupies less than 240 cubic centimeters. In particular, the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20 occupies a volume of less than 100 cubic centimeters. This size reduction over known leak detection devices is significant given the limited availability of space in contemporary automobiles.
A pressure operable device 40 can separate the interior chamber 31 into a first portion 31a and a second portion 31b. The first portion 31a is in fluid communication with the charcoal canister 18 through the first port 36, and the second portion 31b is in fluid communication with the ambient atmosphere through the second port 38.
The pressure operable device 40 includes a poppet 42, a seal 50, and a resilient element 60. During the signaling 22, the poppet 42 and the seal 50 cooperatively engage one another to prevent fluid communication between the first and second ports 36,38. During the vacuum relief 24, the poppet 42 and the seal 50 cooperatively engage one another to permit restricted fluid flow from the second port 38 to the first port 36. During the pressure blow-off 26, the poppet 42 and the seal 50 disengage one another to permit substantially unrestricted fluid flow from the first port 36 to the second port 38.
The pressure operable device 40, with its different arrangements of the poppet 42 and the seal 50, may be considered to constitute a bi-directional check valve. That is to say, under a first set of conditions, the pressure operable device 40 permits fluid flow along a path in one direction, and under a second set of conditions, the same pressure operable device 40 permits fluid flow along the same path in the opposite direction. The volume of fluid flow during the pressure blow-off 26 may be three to ten times as great as the volume of fluid flow during the vacuum relief 24.
The pressure operable device 40 operates without an electromechanical actuator, such as a solenoid that is used in a known leak detection device to controllably displace a fluid flow control valve. Thus, the operation of the pressure operable device 40 can be controlled exclusively by the pressure differential between the first and second ports 36,38. Preferably, all operations of the pressure operable device 40 are controlled by fluid pressure signals that act on one side, i.e., the first port 36 side, of the pressure operable device 40.
The pressure operable device 40 also operates without a diaphragm. Such a diaphragm is used in the known leak detection device to sub-partition an interior chamber and to actuate the flow control valve. Thus, the pressure operable device 40 exclusively separates, and then only intermittently, the interior chamber 31. That is to say, there are at most two portions of the interior chamber 31 that are defined by the housing 30.
The poppet 42 is preferably a low density, substantially rigid disk through which fluid flow is prevented. The poppet 42 can be flat or formed with contours, e.g., to enhance rigidity or to facilitate interaction with other components of the pressure operable device 40.
The poppet 42 can have a generally circular form that includes alternating tabs 44 and recesses 46 around the perimeter of the poppet 42. The tabs 44 can center the poppet 42 within the second housing part 30b, and guide movement of the poppet 42 along an axis A. The recesses 46 can provide a fluid flow path around the poppet 42, e.g., during the vacuum relief 24 or during the pressure blow-off 26. A plurality of alternating tabs 44 and recesses 46 are illustrated, however, there could be any number of tabs 44 or recesses 46, including none, e.g., a disk having a circular perimeter. Of course, other forms and shapes may be used for the poppet 42.
The poppet 42 can be made of any metal (e.g., aluminum), polymer (e.g., nylon), or another material that is impervious to fuel vapor, is low density, is substantially rigid, and has a smooth surface finish. The poppet 42 can be manufactured by stamping, casting, or molding. Of course, other materials and manufacturing techniques may be used for the poppet 42.
The seal 50 can have an annular form including a bead 52 and a lip 54. The bead 52 can be secured between and seal the first housing part 30a with respect to the second housing part 30b. The lip 54 can project radially inward from the bead 52 and, in its undeformed configuration, i.e., as-molded or otherwise produced, project obliquely with respect to the axis A. Thus, preferably, the lip 54 has the form of a hollow frustum. The seal 50 can be made of any material that is sufficiently elastic to permit many cycles of flexing the seal 50 between undeformed and deformed configurations.
Preferably, the seal 50 is molded from rubber or a polymer, e.g., nitrites or fluorosilicones. More preferably, the seal has a stiffness of approximately 50 durometer (Shore A), and is self-lubricating or has an anti-friction coating, e.g., polytetrafluoroethylene.
The resilient element 60 biases the poppet 42 toward the seal 50. The resilient element 60 can be a coil spring that is positioned between the poppet 42 and the second housing part 30b. Preferably, such a coil spring is centered about the axis A.
Different embodiments of the resilient element 60 can include more than one coil spring, a leaf spring, or an elastic block. The different embodiments can also include various materials, e.g., metals or polymers. And the resilient element 60 can be located differently, e.g., positioned between the first housing part 30a and the poppet 42.
It is also possible to use the weight of the poppet 42, in combination with the force of gravity, to urge the poppet 42 toward the seal 50. As such, the biasing force supplied by the resilient element 60 could be reduced or eliminated.
The resilient element 60 provides a biasing force that can be calibrated to set the value of the first predetermined pressure level. The construction of the resilient element 60, in particular the spring rate and length of the resilient member, can be provided so as to set the value of the second predetermined pressure level.
A switch 70 can perform the signaling 22. Preferably, movement of the poppet 42 along the axis A actuates the switch 70. The switch 70 can include a first contact fixed with respect to a body 72 and a movable contact 74. The body 72 can be fixed with respect to the housing 30, e.g., the first housing part 30a, and movement of the poppet 42 displaces movable contact 74 relative to the body 72, thereby closing or opening an electrical circuit in which the switch 70 is connected. In general, the switch 70 is selected so as to require a minimal actuation force, e.g., 50 grams or less, to displace the movable contact 74 relative to the body 72.
Different embodiments of the switch 70 can include magnetic proximity switches, piezoelectric contact sensors, or any other type of device capable of signaling that the poppet 42 has moved to a prescribed position or that the poppet 42 is exerting a prescribed force on the movable contact 74.
Referring now to
The second housing part 30b′ includes a wall 300 projecting into the chamber 31 and surrounding the axis A. The poppet 42′ includes at least one corrugation 420 that also surrounds the axis A. The wall 300 and the at least one corrugation 420 are sized and arranged with respect to one another such that the corrugation 420 telescopically receives the wall 300 as the poppet 42′ moves along the axis A, i.e., to provide a dashpot type structure. Preferably, the wall 300 and the at least one corrugation 420 are right-circle cylinders.
The wall 300 and the at least one corrugation 420 cooperatively define a sub-chamber 310 within the chamber 31′. Movement of the poppet 42′ along the axis A causes fluid displacement between the chamber 31′ and the sub-chamber 310. This fluid displacement has the effect of damping resonance of the poppet 42′. A metering aperture (not show) could be provided to define a dedicated flow channel for the displacement of fluid between the chamber 31′ and the sub-chamber 310′.
As it is shown in
The signaling 22 occurs when vacuum at the first predetermined pressure level is present at the first port 36. During the signaling 22, the poppet 42 and the seal 50 cooperatively engage one another to prevent fluid communication between the first and second ports 36,38.
The force created as a result of vacuum at the first port 36 causes the poppet 42 to be displaced toward the first housing part 30a. This displacement is opposed by elastic deformation of the seal 50. At the first predetermined pressure level, e.g., one inch of water vacuum relative to the atmospheric pressure, displacement of the poppet 42 will actuate the switch 70, thereby opening or closing an electrical circuit that can be monitored by an electronic control unit 76. As vacuum is released, i.e., the pressure at the first port 36 rises above the first predetermined pressure level, the elasticity of the seal 50 pushes the poppet 42 away from the switch 70, thereby resetting the switch 70.
During the signaling 22, there is a combination of forces that act on the poppet 42, i.e., the vacuum force at the first port 36 and the biasing force of the resilient element 60. This combination of forces moves the poppet 42 along the axis A to a position that deforms the seal 50 in a substantially symmetrical manner. This arrangement of the poppet 42 and seal 50 are schematically indicated in
In the course of the seal 50 being deformed during the signaling 22, the lip 54 slides along the poppet 42 and performs a cleaning function by scraping-off any debris that may be on the poppet 42.
The vacuum relief 24 occurs as the pressure at the first port 36 further decreases, i.e., the pressure decreases below the first predetermined pressure level that actuates the switch 70. At some level of vacuum that is below the first predetermined level, e.g., six inches of water vacuum relative to atmosphere, the vacuum acting on the seal 50 will deform the lip 54 so as to at least partially disengage from the poppet 42.
During the vacuum relief 24, it is believed that, at least initially, the vacuum relief 24 causes the seal 50 to deform in an asymmetrical manner. This arrangement of the poppet 42 and seal 50 are schematically indicated in
The fluid flow that occurs during the vacuum relief 24 is restricted by the size of the gap between the lip 54 and the poppet 42. It is believed that the size of the gap between the lip 54 and the poppet 42 is related to the level of the pressure below the first predetermined pressure level. Thus, a small gap is all that is formed to relieve pressure slightly below the first predetermined pressure level, and a larger gap is formed to relieve pressure that is significantly below the first predetermined pressure level. This resizing of the gap is performed automatically by the seal 50 in accordance with the construction of the lip 54, and is believed to eliminate pulsations due to repeatedly disengaging and reengaging the seal 50 with respect to the poppet 42. Such pulsations could arise due to the vacuum force being relieved momentarily during disengagement, but then building back up as soon as the seal 50 is reengaged with the poppet 42.
Referring now to
The fluid flow that occurs during the pressure blow-off 26 is substantially unrestricted by the space between the poppet 42 and the lip 54. That is to say, the space between the poppet 42 and the lip 54 presents very little restriction to the fluid flow between the first and second ports 36,38.
At least four advantages are achieved in accordance with the operations performed by the fuel vapor pressure management apparatus 20. First, providing a leak detection diagnostic using vacuum monitoring during natural cooling, e.g., after the engine is turned off. Second, providing relief for vacuum below the first predetermined pressure level, and providing relief for positive pressure above the second predetermined pressure level. Third, vacuum relief provides fail-safe purging of the canister 18. And fourth, the relieving pressure 26 regulates the pressure in the fuel tank 12 during any situation in which the engine is turned off, thereby limiting the amount of positive pressure in the fuel tank 12 and allowing the cool-down vacuum effect to occur sooner.
It is desirable to provide a means of evaluating the methodology used and the results obtained during leak detection testing of the fuel system 10. In particular, according to a preferred embodiment, it is desirable to monitor the frequency of successful leak detection tests, which can be expressed as an “in-use rate calculation” for the system 10. The fundamental basis for the in-use rate calculation according to the preferred embodiment is Charles's Law, which states that in a closed system (i.e., having a constant volume of fluid), a change in the temperature of the fluid is proportional to a change in the pressure of the fluid.
The ability of a leak detection test to accurately indicate the absence or presence of a leak can be undermined, for example, if the leak detection test is performed too infrequently, or if the conditions under which the test is performed render inaccurate the test results. One example of test conditions that may cause inaccurate results is referred to as a “hot garage cycle,” which occurs when the engine is operated for a short period of time and the vehicle is subsequently stored in a warm garage. Under these conditions, there is insufficient opportunity for the occurrence of any significant natural vacuum in the fuel system 10, which may result in a false indication that there is a leak present in the fuel system 10. Thus, it is believed that there is a need to consider the frequency of testing and the quality of the test conditions in order to properly interpret the results of leak detection testing.
According to a preferred embodiment, the in-use rate calculation is an indicator of the frequency that successful leak detection tests are performed, and is calculated as a ratio of the numbers of “monitoring events” per “driving events,” i.e., as N/D.
According to the preferred embodiment, the number of driving events D can only be incremented when the following combination of events occur: 1) engine operation is initiated from a cold start, 2) there is a minimum of ten minutes engine running time, 3) there is minimum of five minutes of cumulative vehicle operation at or above 25 miles per hour, 4) there is a minimum of 30 seconds of engine idle, 5) the ambient temperature is between 40 degrees Fahrenheit and 95 degrees Fahrenheit, and 6) the altitude during engine operation is below 8000 feet.
According to the preferred embodiment, there are at least two methods by which the number of monitoring events N can be incremented. According to the “statistical” method, the number of monitoring events N is incremented when the following combination of events occur: within a total accumulated time of 24 hours there is a minimum of one engine running occurrence and a minimum of one engine hot soak that lasts at least two hours. As it is used herein, “hot soak” refers the period after which the engine is turned “off” after having reached its operating temperature. Alternatively, according to the “decay” method, the number of monitoring events N is incremented when the temperature decays, i.e., decreases, a minimum of four degrees Celsius for a minimum of two hours. According to a preferred embodiment, the temperature is that of the fluid per se in the headspace, but may also be another temperature that can be correlated with that of the fluid in the headspace. For example, it may be possible to correlate measurements of the ambient temperature proximate to the fuel tank 12 with the temperature of fluid in the headspace.
An advantage of the statistical method according to the preferred embodiment is that the in-use rate can be calculated without taking a temperature measurement. Thus, there is no need to provide a temperature sensor according to the statistical method. An advantage of the decay method is that the validation of a leak detection test can be obtained in as few as a single vehicle operation. Preferably, at least two vehicle operations are included in the decay method.
According to a preferred embodiment using the statistical method, the occurrence of a minimum number, e.g., five, unsuccessful 24 hour tests that are logged in series is indicative of a malfunction of the system 10, which can be indicated by illuminating a vehicle dash mounted malfunction indicator light (MIL).
According to a preferred embodiment, a circuit provided on a printed circuit board can perform the in-use rate calculation. Such a printed circuit board can, for example, also be used to support the switch 70 with respect to the housing 30.
Under circumstances when the in-rate use calculation exceeds a predetermined value, the interpretation of the leak detection testing results can reasonably be validated. The predetermined minimum value for the N/D ratio can be establish by a vehicle manufacturer as a requirement, or regulated by a government agency. For example, it is believed that the California Air Resources Board has established a minimum N/D=0.336.
While the present invention has been disclosed with reference to certain preferred embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it have the full scope defined by the language of the following claims, and equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/412,578, filed 23 Sep. 2002, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Related co-pending U.S. Utility application Ser. Nos. 10/170,397, 10/170,395, 10/171,473, 10/171,472, 10/171,471, 10/171,470, 10/171,469, and 10/170,420, all of which were filed 14 Jun. 2002, are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Related co-pending applications that are being filed concurrently herewith are identified by Ser. Nos. 10/667,965 (“Method Of Designing A Fuel Vapor Pressure Management Apparatus”), 10/667,963 (“Apparatus And Method Of Changing Printed Circuit Boards In A Fuel Vapor Pressure Management Apparatus”), and 10/667,903 (“Rationality Testing For A Fuel Vapor Pressure Management Apparatus”), all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 322084 | Wilder | Jul 1885 | A |
| 2204706 | Searle | Jun 1940 | A |
| 2318962 | Parker | May 1943 | A |
| 2679946 | Friend | Jun 1954 | A |
| 3413840 | Basile et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3741282 | Soberski | Jun 1973 | A |
| 4368366 | Kitamura et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4819607 | Aubel | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4842015 | Haak et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4926825 | Ohtaka et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4949695 | Uranishi et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4951701 | Boehmer | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4962744 | Uranishi et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5021071 | Reddy | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5036823 | MacKinnon | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5088466 | Tada | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5105789 | Aramaki et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5113834 | Aramaki | May 1992 | A |
| 5116257 | Szlaga | May 1992 | A |
| 5143035 | Kayanuma | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5146902 | Cook et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5150689 | Yano et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5158054 | Otsuka | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5191870 | Cook | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5224511 | Schnettler | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5253629 | Fornuto et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5263462 | Reddy | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5295472 | Otsuka et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5373822 | Thompson | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5449018 | Harris | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5524662 | Benjey et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5863025 | Noya | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5911209 | Kouda et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6328021 | Perry et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6450152 | Everingham | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6460566 | Perry et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478045 | Perry | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6564780 | Hanai et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO-9112426 | Aug 1991 | WO |
| WO-0138716 | May 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60412578 | Sep 2002 | US |
