In surgeries of the bony portion of the spinal column that are often performed for back pain or nerve compression, a common complication is incidental durotomy. Incidental durotomy occurs when a tear is accidentally created in the dura during the surgical procedure. The dura mater is the fibrous covering and outer limit of the thecal sac, which includes the spinal cord, the cerebrospinal fluid (“CSF”) that bathes and protects the spinal cord, and the meninges that surround the spinal cord and CSF. The tear must be closed intraoperatively in order to prevent the formation of a CSF leak that occurs when the CSF is able to exit the thecal sac.
A CSF leak can lead to many delayed complications such as headache, prolonged wound healing, and infection, amongst others, and may necessitate reoperation to close the durotomy if it does not spontaneously resolve. This comes with a financial burden, as the cost to both the hospital and patient are increased when a durotomy occurs.
Currently, the gold standard of incidental durotomy repair is primary closure, where the tear is closed via suturing. Great care must be taken when closing a durotomy with suture to ensure that the spinal cord is not injured by the needle, that the closure does not cause kinking of the thecal sac, which could result in spinal cord compression, and that the durotomy is entirely closed so CSF does not leak. Thus, the repair procedure can be lengthy and complicated.
Further, primary closure with suture is typically augmented with a secondary closure procedure, which often involves placement of a patch over the site of durotomy and application of a sealant with a goal to reinforce the closure. In cases where the durotomy cannot be closed via suture due to a location not being amenable to suturing or when the dural defect is complex, only secondary closure is attempted with hopes that the dural patch and sealant will be sufficient. Ultimately, the presence of a durotomy adds time to the operation, mental fatigue for the surgeon, the chance for postoperative complications and possibly reoperation.
Although incidental durotomy is being used as the example, this principle of closing an opening in a barrier tissue is not isolated to spine surgery, but a common practice of many other surgical fields. For instance, in laparoscopic surgery, where surgical instruments and a camera are passed through small incisions made in the abdomen and advanced through the peritoneum, i.e., the connective tissue which forms the outer limit of the abdominal cavity, these so-called port sites must be closed at the end of the procedure to prevent abdominal organs from herniating out of the abdomen. Additional examples of where tissue openings must be surgically closed include, but are not limited to, operations that take place within a joint, within the spinal cord, on intrauterine fetuses, within blood vessels, hollow organ perforation, or burr hole closure.
In a first aspect, an example implant for closing a tissue opening is disclosed. The implant includes (a) a barbed suture having a first end and a second end, (b) a first disc statically coupled to the first end of the barbed suture at a center of the first disc; and (c) a second disc having a through-hole arranged in a center of the second disc, where the second disc is moveably coupled to the barbed suture via the through-hole.
In a second aspect, an example surgical system for closing a tissue opening is disclosed. The surgical system includes (a) the implant according to the first aspect of the disclosure, and (b) a delivery device having a lumen with a first end having a delivery opening, a second end, an inner diameter, and an outer diameter, where the implant is disposed in the lumen of the delivery device such that the first disc is arranged adjacent to the delivery opening of the lumen and the second disc is arranged in the lumen between the first disc and the second end of the lumen, and where the second end of the lumen is coupled to a force-imparting guide.
In a third aspect, an example method of closing a tissue opening during a surgical procedure using the surgical system according to the second aspect of the disclosure is provided. The method includes (a) inserting the first end of the delivery device into the tissue opening, (b) advancing the first disc of the implant out of the delivery opening of the lumen and through the tissue opening, the first disc thereby expanding into a deployment condition adjacent a first side of the tissue opening, (c) retracting the first end of the delivery device from the tissue opening such that the barbed suture extends through the tissue opening, (d) advancing the second disc of the implant out of the delivery opening of the lumen, the second disc thereby expanding into a deployment condition adjacent a second side of the tissue opening; and (e) advancing the second disc toward the tissue opening and the first disc until the second disc is in facial contact with the second side of the tissue opening thereby sealing the tissue opening between the first disc and the second disc.
The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed can be achieved independently in various examples or may be combined in yet other examples further details of which can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
The drawings are for the purpose of illustrating examples, but it is understood that the disclosure is not limited to the arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings.
Implants, surgical systems, and methods constructed in accordance with the principles herein are designed to quickly close or initiate closure of durotomies or other tissue openings during a surgical procedure such as, but not limited to, laparoscopic port sites, the amnion for fetal procedures, the joint capsule in arthroscopic procedures, burr holes in neurosurgical procedures, or any hollow organ perforation.
The specific benefits of the disclosed implant, in the context of incidental durotomy, among others, are reduced durotomy repair time, reduced surgeon fatigue, improved durotomy closure, and synergy with current secondary repair devices. In patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery, incidental durotomy repair has been shown to prolong the surgical case by an average of 55.6 minutes (249.8±100.3 minutes vs 194.2±95.4 minutes). This is due to the time taken to carefully suture the durotomy closed, then test the closure intraoperatively.
Implants and surgical systems of the present improve incidental durotomy repair that can now be closed in a process that takes just seconds to minutes once it is in the field. Additionally, implants and surgical systems herein offer the ability to primarily close durotomies which may be inaccessible for closure by suturing. For example, durotomies which are on the side of the thecal sac near the boney elements of the spine are often difficult to suture due to limitations of space. With the implants and surgical systems herein, as long as a delivery device can be introduced to the durotomy, the implant can be delivered and deployed thereby closing the durotomy. Repair of an incidental durotomy during the surgery has been shown to decrease hospital stays, reduce hospital readmissions, and lower rates of reoperation and infection. Another benefit of the implants and surgical systems disclosed herein is improved closure compared to suturing, which would result in fewer instances of CSF leaks, and ultimately fewer complications and reoperations for patients of procedures where durotomies are encountered.
In a first aspect of the disclosure, shown in
In one implementation, the barbed suture has a plurality of barbs 113 arranged unidirectionally such that the second disc 120 is configured to be advanced in a single direction toward the first disc 115. The technical effect of the uni-directional barbs 113 is to permit advancement of the second disc 120 along the barbed suture 110 toward the first disc 115 but to restrict movement of the second disc 120 toward the second end 112 of the barbed suture 110. The plurality of barbs 113 are preferably compactly spaced to minimize or eliminate play or movement of the discs 115, 120 once they are in a locked condition (
In one implementation, the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 have a delivery condition, shown in
In one optional implementation, the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 have the same diameter in the deployment condition. In a further optional implementation, the diameter of the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 is 0.5 mm to 1 mm larger than a widest point of the tissue opening 105.
In one optional implementation, the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 each have a convex face 116, 123 and a concave face 117, 124. In a further implementation, the convex face 116 of the first disc 115 is arranged facing the first end 111 of the barbed suture 110 and the concave face 117 of the first disc 115 is arranged facing the second disc 120. In addition, the convex face 123 of the second disc 120 is arranged facing the second end 112 of the barbed suture 110 and the concave face 124 of the second disc 120 is arranged facing the first disc 115. In other words, the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 may be substantially hemispherical.
In one optional implementation, the first disc 115, the second disc 120, and the barbed suture 110 are biodegradable. Additionally, materials can be selected for discs herein based on a particular application. For example, it may be preferable for certain procedures to use permanent materials, while in other cases, it may be preferable to use a biodegradable material. In another implementation, the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 are made of a biogel, a polymer, or a microplastic, as some examples. In optional implementations, the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 are formed of a malleable material.
In another optional implementation, the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 are self-expanding such that the first disc 1125 and the second disc 120 are outwardly biased towards the deployment condition (
In one implementation, the second disc 120 is spaced apart from the first disc 115 along the barbed suture 110 to permit deployment of the first disc 115 on a first side 106 of the tissue opening 105 and deployment of the second disc 120 on the second side 107 of the tissue opening 105.
In a second aspect of the disclosure, shown in
In one implementation, ss the discs are malleable, the discs 115, 120 will be folded around their concavities into a conical shape and stored in a suitable delivery syringe, the syringe having a diameter less than that of the unfolded discs 115, 120.
In one optional implementation, when the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 are in a deployment condition (
In one optional implementation, shown in
In one optional implementation, the delivery device 130 is a syringe (
Referring now to
In one optional implementation, the first end 131 of the delivery device 130 is inserted into a durotomy where the first disc 115 is advanced out of the delivery device 130 into the thecal sac. Then the delivery device 130 is removed from the durotomy and the second disc 120 and second end 112 of the barbed suture 110 are advanced out of the delivery device 130 outside the thecal sac. The barbed suture 110 can be pulled taut by the surgeon so that the first disc 115 is pulled tight against the first side 106 of the tissue thereby covering the durotomy in its entirety. Then, while the barbed suture 110 is still under tension, the surgeon slides the second disc 120 down the barbed suture 110 onto the second side 107 of the tissue bringing the first disc 115 and the second disc 120 together and thereby sandwiching the dura in between them and sealing the durotomy closed. The excess barbed suture 110 may then be cut from an outside top surface of the second disc 120.
The implant 100, surgical system 125, and method 200 in accordance with the principles herein represent an intraoperative mode of durotomy repair that would both reduce the amount of time it takes to repair the durotomy and expand the proportion of durotomies that can be primarily closed. Additionally, this the implant 100 and surgical systems 125 could be used in conjunction with current methods of secondary closure, as the implant 100 can be used to fasten a dural patch to the durotomy, and dural sealant can be used over the exterior surface of the implant 100 after deployment.
In operation, when repairing the dura mater, there will be an egress of fluid displaced out of the subarachnoid space by the implant 100 due to the perforation or tissue opening 105 that would prevent a build up of pressure at the treatment location. Still further, since the first disc 115 is pulled tightly against the first surface 106 of the tissue or the dura, the first disc 115 will not reside against neural elements. In other words, there is no pressure applied to neural elements. Once the implant 100 is deployed and the tissue opening 105 is sealed, further outflux of CSF would be prevented. Still further, a majority of spinal CSF leaks or dural tears occur in the lumbar and sacral spine. As such, the implant would typically be delivered to the L2-S2 vertebral levels, where the spinal cord is not present.
In one optional implementation, the method 200 further includes removing a portion of the barbed suture 110 from a convex side 123 of the second disc 120 after the tissue opening 105 is sealed (
In one optional implementation, shown in
In one optional implementation, the second disc is manually advanced along the barbed suture 110 via a force applied to the convex face 123 of the second disc 120. For example, forceps may be used to push the second disc 120 along the barbed suture 110 or a surgeon may use several fingers to push the disc 120 along the barbed suture 100 to seal the tissue opening 105 between the two discs 115, 120.
The description of different advantageous arrangements has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the examples in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Further, different advantageous examples may describe different advantages as compared to other advantageous examples. The example or examples selected are chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the examples, the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the disclosure for various examples with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application is a U.S. Non-Provisional application that claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/327,408, filed Apr. 5, 2022, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63327408 | Apr 2022 | US |