This invention relates to the field of laparoscopic surgical devices.
Laparoscopic (minimally invasive) surgery has become the standard for performing numerous surgical procedures across various surgical specialties. Traditionally, an incision in made in the umbilicus for insertion of a port containing a camera device for visualization during laparoscopic surgery. Placement of laparoscopic instruments during laparoscopic surgery requires the creation of multiple skin incisions with a scalpel, and then placement of laparoscopic ports. Multiple laparoscopic instruments can then be passed through each laparoscopic port to perform the surgical procedure. Typically, laparoscopic ports range from five (5) to twelve millimeters (12 mm) in diameter, and leave an abdominal scar and contribute to post-operative pain. Usually, three to four laparoscopic ports are placed during traditional laparoscopic surgery.
Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) surgery has been introduced as a means to perform minimally invasive surgery without noticeable abdominal incisions, and to improve post-operative pain. LESS surgery is performed entirely through a single incision in the umbilicus. This eliminates multiple incisions during laparoscopic surgery, but also creates many challenges. Since the surgery is performed entirely through a single umbilical incision, and the instruments are in close proximity to each other, the ability to manipulate instruments during the surgery is limited. This creates “sword fighting,” in which the instruments constantly collide into each other during surgery, and contributes to inefficient surgical movements. There is also loss of triangulation, in which instruments are traditionally inserted into the abdomen at multiple different port sites and allows for easy manipulation of tissue since the angles of the instruments are varied. These challenges ultimately increase surgical operative time and reduce efficiency of the surgery.
Thus there is a need for a system that avoids instrument collision while still providing robust surgical devices. However, in view of the prior art considered as a whole at the time the present invention was made, it was not obvious to those of ordinary skill in the applicable art how such a system could be provided.
The novel laparoscopic instrument can be placed into an abdomen without the creation of a skin incision. The shaft of the laparoscopic instrument is 1.6 mm in diameter with a beveled end, resembling an intravenous needle. The beveled end is placed into the abdomen similar to the placement of a needle, without creation of a skin incision with a scalpel.
The operating instruments, such as graspers, cutting forceps or cautery instruments, are docked to the beveled end of the shaft after the shaft is placed into the abdomen. These operative instruments are introduced into the abdomen through the umbilical port using a docking device, and then docked to the beveled end of the shaft. When docking is completed, the docking device is removed and the surgical procedure is performed. Multiple types of instrument tips can be placed on the beveled end of the shaft during the surgical procedure using the docking device to engage and disengage the surgical instruments. At the end of the surgical procedure, the operative instruments are undocked and the 1.6 mm shaft is removed. This allows the surgeon to place multiple instruments, in any location, during the laparoscopic surgery, thus preserving triangulation and efficiency of the surgery without creating abdominal scars.
For a fuller understanding of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention relates to a laparoscopic instrument that is placed into the abdomen at any preselected location without the creation of a skin incision. The shaft of the laparoscopic instrument is 1.6 mm in diameter with a beveled end that resembles an intravenous needle.
Selected operating instruments, such as graspers, cutting forceps or cautery instruments, having diameters that exceed 1.6 mm, are introduced into the abdomen through the umbilical port. The selected operating instrument is docked in a holster when it is introduced through said umbilical port. This prevents unwanted cutting or grasping of tissue, i.e., the operating instrument cannot be used until it is removed from the holster.
A novel locking or docking mechanism is positioned at the trailing end of the selected operating instrument and is engaged by the leading end of the laparoscopic instrument shaft. That shaft is hereinafter referred to as the outer shaft because it houses an inner shaft within its lumen and said inner shaft controls the opening and closing of the blades or graspers at the leading end of the selected operating instrument.
A predetermined surgical procedure is performed after the selected operating instrument is removed from the holster and said selected operating instrument is returned to the holster and locked therein when the surgical procedure is completed. The laparoscopic instrument is then disengaged from the locking mechanism and withdrawn from the abdomen. The selected operating instrument and its holster are withdrawn through said umbilical port.
Multiple types of instrument tips can be placed on the beveled end of the outer shaft during the surgical procedure using the docking device or locking mechanism to “dock” and “undock” the operating instruments. This allows the surgeon to place multiple instruments in any location during the laparoscopic surgery, thus preserving triangulation and efficiency of the surgery without creating abdominal scars.
To prevent an object from moving relative to another object, all degrees of freedom of motion must be constrained. An object with no constraints has six degrees of freedom (DOF) as depicted in
The selected operating instrument locks onto the instrument outer shaft, restricting its movement on said outer shaft. It is impossible to drop the selected operating instrument because the docking and undocking of the selected operating instrument with the holster is performed by the same locking mechanism.
When operative instrument tip 10 having blades 11, also known as scissors or graspers, is docked inside holster 12 (
Operative instrument tip 10 is hereinafter referred to as cutting head 10.
Inner lock ring 20 is circumscribed by outer lock ring 22 as depicted in
Outer shaft 24 (
Inner shaft 52 (
Inner lock ring pin 20a and outer lock ring pin 22a of outer lock ring 22 are pushed into a position by outer shaft 24 that radially aligns them with one another. Lock ring pins 20a and 22a in said radially aligned position allow inner lock ring 20 to rotate inside outer lock ring 22 and keep outer shaft 24 from sliding in and out.
By rotating outer shaft 24, inner lock ring 20 can rotate fully into position. This causes face pin 18 to align with face pin holes 30 (
Cutting head 10 is slid back onto holster 12 and outer shaft 24 is rotated fully in the counterclockwise direction to lock cutting head 10 back onto holster 12 and align lock ring pins 20a and 22a in radial alignment with one another when the surgical procedure is completed. Outer shaft 24 can be removed from cutting head 10 when lock ring pins 20a and 22a are radially aligned with one another.
A more detailed explanation of the above structure follows.
Cutting head 10 is depicted from its trailing and leading ends in
Position three is depicted in
When cutting head 10 is docked in holster 12, face pin 18 (
The bore or bores that receive the face pin depression pin or pins are formed in the top half of the cutting head housing as depicted in
Inner lock pin 20a is securely held in between the inner wall or lumen of outer lock ring 22 and outer shaft groove 24b, which also prevents outer shaft 24 from being displaced axially in or out of cutting head 10. Inner lock ring 20 is locked into place by face pin 18, and outer shaft 24 is locked into place by inner lock pin 20a.
The embodiments disclosed herein provide a non-invasive surgical tool that is purely mechanical in nature.
The advantages set forth above, and those made apparent from the foregoing description, are efficiently attained. Since certain changes may be made in the above construction without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matters contained in the foregoing description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
The following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein disclosed, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 15/200,730 filed Jul. 1, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 13/693,252 filed Dec. 4, 2012, which claims priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/039272 filed on Jun. 6, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/351,512 filed Jun. 4, 2010, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5322055 | Davison et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
6007561 | Bourque et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
8235992 | Guerra | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20040138701 | Haluck | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060079934 | Ogawa | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080215051 | Buysse et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090012477 | Norton et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Aurora D. Pryor, John R. Tushar, Louis R. DiBernardo, Single-port cholecystectomy with the TransEnterix SPIDER: simple and safe, Surg Endosc (2010) 24:917-923. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/039272, dated Feb. 17, 2012. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/039272, dated Feb. 17, 2012. |
Aziz M. Merchant & Michael W. Cook & Brent C. White & S. Scott Davis & John F. Sweeney & Edward Lin, Transumbilical Gelport Access Technique for Performing Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), J Gastrointest Surg (2009) 13:159-162. |
Athanassios C. Petrotos, Bruce M. Molinelli, Single-incision multiport laparoendoscopic (SIMPLE) surgery: early evaluation of SIMPLE cholecystectomy in a community setting, Surg Endosc (2009) 23:2631-2634. |
Alan A. Saber & Mohamed H. Elgamal & Ed A. Itawi & Arun J. Rao, Single Incision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (SILS): A Novel Technique, Obes Surg, 2008, pp. 1-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190231380 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61351512 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15200730 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 16380585 | US | |
Parent | 13693252 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 15200730 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2011/039272 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13693252 | US |