This invention relates to a device implantable within the abdomen to treat urinary incontinence.
In the United States, more than 13 million people suffer from the effects of urinary incontinence. Although significant numbers of men are afflicted, women suffer-from this disorder in disproportionate and overwhelming numbers.
Some factors which lead to incontinence in women include the effects of childbirth, hysterectomies, urinary tract infections, relaxation of the pelvic muscles and the thinning of urethral tissue associated with hormone reduction during menopause. These factors contribute to a weakening of the urinary sphincter muscles (located beneath the bladder surrounding the urethra) which may lead to “stress incontinence”, “urge incontinence” or a mixture of both types of incontinence. Stress incontinence is associated with the involuntary leakage of urine due to increased pressure on the bladder occasioned by such mundane actions such as coughing, sneezing, laughing, bending or lifting heavy objects. Urge incontinence occurs when one has the need to urinate but is unable to prevent leakage until proper facilities are reached.
There are several disadvantages to this device. It is not always possible to establish the proper sling tension. Too much tension means that it will be difficult, if not impossible, for the person to urinate using muscular contractions that compress the bladder. Too little tension means that the disorder remains uncorrected despite the person having undergone the procedure. It is, furthermore, difficult to adjust the tension once the sling is implanted. Adjustment is desirable because over time, the muscles and other tissue of the abdomen change in their compliance, strength and tone, and what may be sufficient tension at one point in time may be too much or too little later, leading to problems which must again be addressed by invasive surgery. Probably the worst problem associated with slings currently in use is known as “erosion”, whereby, in response to normal movement and pressure of the abdominal muscles, the edge of the sling, being relatively sharp, cuts through the abdominal tissue and enters the urethra. Erosion is indicated by burning pain during urination.
There is clearly a need for an improved sling for the treatment of urinary incontinence that does not suffer the disadvantages of present treatment devices.
The invention concerns a urinary incontinence sling positionable in the abdomen between the urethra and the vagina to compress the urethra. In one embodiment, the sling comprises an elongated tube having opposite end portions and an intermediate portion positioned between the end portions. The intermediate portion is bendable to form a substantially U-shaped cradle positionable adjacent to the urethra. The end portions are positionable so as to extend through the abdomen in a direction away from the vagina. The end portions are in anchoring engagement with living tissue forming the abdomen. The intermediate portion compresses the urethra with a predetermined force.
The tube has a cross sectional shape which may be circular, oval or elliptical for example. Preferably, the tube comprises a plurality of interlaced filamentary members. The filamentary members may be interlaced by knitting, weaving or braiding. The end portions are substantially inextensible, and the intermediate portion is lengthwise elastically extensible.
In another embodiment, an elastically expandable and contractible body is positioned within the intermediate portion of the tube. The body has a predetermined internal pressure. The pressure substantially determines the compressive force exerted on the urethra by the tube.
The tube may comprise a pouch positioned at the intermediate portion of the tube. The pouch is defined by closing the tube at two locations in spaced apart relation to one another. The pouch is used to contain the expandable and contractable body within the intermediate portion.
In another embodiment, the urinary incontinence sling comprises elongated end portions oppositely disposed and an intermediate portion positioned between the end portions. The intermediate portion is bendable to form a substantially U-shaped cradle positionable adjacent to the urethra. The end portions are substantially inextensible and are positionable so as to extend through the abdomen in a direction away from the vagina. The end portions are in anchoring engagement with living tissue forming the abdomen. The intermediate portion compresses the urethra with a predetermined force. In this embodiment, the intermediate portion is preferably lengthwise elastically extensible. The end portions preferably comprise elongated straps and the intermediate portion comprises a tube. An elastically expandable and contractible body may be positioned within the tube that comprises the intermediate portion. The body has a predetermined internal pressure that substantially determines the compressive force exerted on the urethra by the intermediate portion.
End portions 34 and 36 are substantially inextensible lengthwise, especially in comparison with center portion 38, which is lengthwise elastically extensible. By varying the longitudinal stiffness as a function of position along the sling 30 it is possible to achieve better control over the transverse compressive force applied to the urethra and thereby avoid the aforementioned problems associated with too little or too much sling tension. Furthermore, because they are substantially inextensible, the end portions 34 and 36, which anchor the sling 30 within the abdomen, are less susceptible to the effects of “sling recoil” as described in detail below.
In a preferred embodiment, sling 30 is formed from warp knitted polypropylene monofilaments.
Polypropylene is preferred because it is bio-compatible, provokes a healing response from living tissue and has a history of success as a material implantable within the human body. Other polymers such as nylon, polyester and polytetrafluoroethylene are also feasible as are bio-absorbable materials such as polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid, PEA, PEUR, PEG and PLLA.
Warp knitting is preferred because it provides a filamentary mesh structure that yields a substantially lengthwise inextensible tube 32, advantageous for reasons discussed in detail below. The axial stiffness that governs the lengthwise extensibility of the various portions may be controlled by increasing or decreasing the number of warp yarns in a portion, by introducing warp yarns having greater or lesser diameter, by making the warp yarns from materials having greater or lesser moduli of elasticity, or by a combination of any of these techniques. The substantially inextensible end portions 34 and 36 preferably have an extensibility between about 10% to about 20% per unit load, with about 15% extensibility per unit load being most preferred.
Tube 32 may also be woven, the leno weave being preferred for woven embodiments because it too produces an axially inextensible structure. Braiding is also feasible, with the triaxial braid providing the desired control over lengthwise elongation of the tube. The tube may also be a substantially continuous membrane, preferably formed of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.
The tube 32 preferably has a round cross-section with a diameter of about 7 mm. Other cross-sectional shapes, such as oval, ellipsoidal or polygonal are of course feasible. The width of tube 32 is about 10 mm when flattened in contact with the abdominal tissue as shown in
Implanting of sling 30 is described with reference to
Sling 30 is anchored in position by end portions 34 and 36. Anchoring may be effected in various ways, for example, by the intergrowth of abdominal tissue 46 through the end portions 34 and 36. For such anchoring, it advantageous to provide end portions 34 and 36 with appropriate material properties, surface texture and porosity that favors tissue ingrowth so that a strong anchoring of the sling is quickly achieved. Materials such as polypropylene are used in the end portions because polypropylene is known to provoke an aggressive healing response in living tissue. The surface texture of the end portions may be enhanced by the addition of a knap or by annealing the surface by the application of heat, or by using a particular stitch or multifilament yarn which gives a desired roughness. Furthermore, the porosity of the end portions 34 and 36 may be tailored to have interstitial spaces sized to promote tissue ingrowth. Porosity may be controlled by weave or stitch density as well as by varying the size of the filaments and their type, i.e., multifilaments, monofilaments and texturized filaments may be combined to yield a desired effect. The healing response may also be encouraged by the use of coatings on the end portions 34 and 36 such as thrombin and collagen.
It is advantageous that cradle 40 have a smooth, soft surface that helps to mitigate erosion. To that end, the intermediate portion 38 may have different characteristics from the end portions 34 and 36, for example, the density of the weave, knit or braid may be greater to better distribute the forces applied to the urethra 16. Alternately, it may be advantageous to form intermediate portion 38 from a lower density material with a correspondingly softer surface.
Two advantages of the sling 30 according to the invention may be explained with reference to
The second advantage of the sling 30 is provided by the manner of interlacing the filamentary members comprising the tube 32 which emphasizes control over the axial stiffness of the tube. As explained above for the sling 30 according to the invention, the particular knit, weave or braid is chosen to produce a substantially lengthwise inextensible tube (i.e., little to no stretch under tensile load). The advantage of an inextensible tube is that, once set during implantation, the pressure exerted on the urethra 16 by the sling will not change significantly due to “recoil” of the sling.
Recoil occurs most acutely with prior art slings 10, shown in
Sling 30, being substantially lengthwise 20 inextensible, avoids the problems associated with sling recoil. As they are drawn through the abdominal tissue 46, the end portions 34 and 36 of sling 30 do not stretch significantly and thus will not recoil and change the pressure on the urethra after implanting of the sling. Furthermore, because there is so little elastic tension within the end portions 34 and 36 as compared with the center portion 38 where the elasticity is concentrated, the pressure on the urethra may be established more precisely and reliably, as it is not necessary to account for the elasticity of the entire sling, only the more limited central portion 38. Thus, by concentrating the elasticity of the sling in the center portion 38 (and not in the end portions 34 and 36) the problem of changing sling tension due to recoil is substantially reduced or eliminated.
An alternate embodiment of a sling 50 allowing for adjustability of the pressure on the urethra is shown in
The needles 90 are inserted into the vaginal incision as described previously and through the abdominal tissue. The mechanical anchors 94, in the form of a type of staple having deformable legs 96, are attached to the end portions 84 and 86 but are deployable into engagement with the abdominal tissue by a mechanism (not shown) associated with the tools 92. After the sling 80 is positioned as desired (
All of the sling embodiments according to the invention may have radiopaque markers installed to render the sling visible by fluoroscope techniques and thereby facilitate sling positioning within the abdomen. The markers may, for example, be positioned at point locations to indicate boundaries and orientation of the sling, and/or the markers may comprise filamentary members coated with radiopaque material and interlaced with the filamentary members comprising the sling to render the length of the sling visible during implanting.
Slings according to the invention provide numerous advantages over prior art slings including the mitigation or elimination of erosion, the elimination or reduction of recoil effects on urethral pressure as well as providing a sling wherein the pressure on the urethra may be adjusted without the need for invasive surgery. Furthermore, the sling itself, being a tube, provides a guide for the disposition of anchoring systems or other accessories in that the tube interior defines a path through the abdominal tissue.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60580171 | Jun 2004 | US | |
60606977 | Sep 2004 | US |