The following relates to the nuclear reactor arts, nuclear power generation arts, nuclear reactor instrumentation arts, nuclear reactor hydrodynamic design arts, and related arts.
In nuclear reactor designs of the integral pressurized water reactor (integral PWR) type, a nuclear reactor core is immersed in primary coolant water at or near the bottom of a pressure vessel. In a typical design, the primary coolant is maintained in a subcooled liquid phase in a cylindrical pressure vessel that is mounted generally upright (that is, with its cylinder axis oriented vertically). A hollow cylindrical central riser is disposed concentrically inside the pressure vessel. Primary coolant flows upward through the reactor core where it is heated and rises through the central riser, discharges from the top of the central riser and reverses direction to flow downward back toward the reactor core through a downcorner annulus defined between the pressure vessel and the central riser. In the integral PWR design, the at least one steam generator is located inside the pressure vessel, typically in the downcorner annulus. Some illustrative integral PWR designs are described in Thome et al., “Integral Helical Coil Pressurized Water Nuclear Reactor”, U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0316181 A1 published Dec. 16, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety; and Malloy et al., “Compact Nuclear Reactor”, U.S. Pub. No. 2012/0076254 A1 published Mar. 29, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Other light water nuclear reactor designs such as PWR designs with external steam generators, boiling water reactors (BWRs) or so forth, vary the arrangement of the steam generator and other components, but usually locate the radioactive core at or near the bottom of a cylindrical pressure vessel in order to reduce the likelihood of air exposure of the reactor core in a loss of coolant accident (LOCA).
The nuclear reactor core is built up from multiple fuel assemblies. Each fuel assembly includes a number of fuel rods. Spaced vertically along the length of the fuel assembly are grid assemblies which provide structural support to the fuel rods. At the top and bottom of the fuel assembly are an upper end fitting and a lower end fitting, respectively. The fuel assembly also includes guide tubes interspersed among the fuel rods and welded to the grid assemblies. An array of fuel assemblies form the nuclear reactor core, which is contained in a core former. The entire core is supported in a core basket, which may for example be suspended from a lower flange of the pressure vessel or otherwise supported.
Control rods comprising neutron absorbing material are inserted into and lifted out of the guide tubes of the fuel assembly to control core reactivity. Instruments that monitor core conditions (e.g. reactor power, temperature, etc.) and their accompanying cabling may also be inserted into some of the guide tubes. Generally, a guide tube contains either a control rod or an instrument, but usually not both, due to space limitations. The instruments are called incores because they are located in the core. The incores may be located inside of a guide tube in the center or at the edge of a fuel assembly. Locating these instruments in the reactor core, or anywhere in the vessel, is a challenge because the reactor vessel contains high temperature and high pressure water and the core produces high levels of radiation.
In one approach, instrumentation in nuclear reactors have used thimble tubes and guide tubes, as disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,120,491 to Brown et al, filed Sep. 17, 1991. Thimble tubes, which contain primary pressure, run from a seal table through the vessel and into a guide tube. The thimble tubes typically enter the reactor vessel at either the vessel head or the bottom of the vessel. The thimble tubes terminate at the seal table located outside of the reactor, e.g. in a dedicated compartment separate from the reactor compartment. By routing the tubes from above or below the reactor core, there is a (nearly) “straight shot” from the vessel penetration to the guide tube into which the incore instrument is loaded. However, if the tubes are routed from the bottom of the vessel, a leak from around the guide tube penetration would be below the reactor core, which is problematic for LOCA remediation. On the other hand, routing the tubes from above can interfere with control rod drives or other upper internal components.
Disclosed herein are improvements that provide various benefits that will become apparent to the skilled artisan upon reading the following.
In accordance with one aspect, an apparatus includes: a pressure vessel including an upper vessel, a lower vessel, and a mid-flange disposed between and joining the upper vessel and lower vessel; a nuclear reactor core including an array of fuel assemblies comprising fissile material, the nuclear reactor disposed in the pressure vessel; control rods arranged for adjustable insertion into the nuclear reactor core to control the nuclear reactor core; guide frames located above the reactor core and below the mid flange, the guide frames arranged to guide upper portions of the control rods that are withdrawn from the reactor core; and an incore instrument routing tube extending from a vessel penetration at the mid flange and entering the reactor core from above the reactor core.
In accordance with another aspect, a pressure vessel includes upper and lower vessel sections joined by a flanged connection. A nuclear reactor core includes an array of fuel assemblies comprising fissile material. The nuclear reactor core is disposed in the lower vessel section. A side entry vessel penetration is located at a side of the pressure vessel and passes through one of (i) a flange of the flanged connection and (ii) the lower vessel section. An incore instrument routing tube extends from the side entry vessel penetration and enters the reactor core from above the reactor core. The incore instrument routing tube extends from the side-entry vessel penetration with a declination angle AE and includes a 90°−AE downward turn to enter the reactor core from above. The declination angle AE may be zero so that the routing tube extends horizontally from the side-entry vessel penetration and includes a 90° downward tube.
In accordance with another aspect, an apparatus comprises an apparatus includes an incore instrument routing tube extending from a side-entry vessel penetration and entering the reactor core from above the reactor core, the incore instrument routing tube having a bend of at least 60°. In some embodiments the bend is 90°. In some embodiments the incore instrument routing tube has a declination angle greater than 0° at the side entry vessel penetration and has a bend less than 90° and greater than 60° that is effective to orient the incore instrument routing tube to enter the reactor core from above the reactor core.
The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various process operations and arrangements of process operations. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
During reactor operation, the reactor core 18 is monitored by incore instrumentation, which is routed from the core to a feedthrough porting the incore cabling out of the pressure vessel. Within the reactor core, a few guide tubes are used for incore instrumentation. (The remaining guide tubes in the core serve to receive control rods). Outside the reactor core 18, routing tubes convey the cabling from the reactor core at least up to the feedthrough passing through the pressure vessel wall. Note that the term “guide tube” is sometimes used in the art to refer not only to guide tubes in the reactor core but also to tubing serving as cable conduits outside of the reactor core. For this disclosure, to avoid confusion, tubing that houses incore cables outside of the core is referred to as a “routing tube.” The term “guide tube” is used to refer to the guide tubes that are part of the reactor core. The incore instrument cabling itself may be a mineral insulated cable (MI cable), and/or may include a thimble tube sheathing the electrical conductor. In either case, routing tubes provide support for the incore cables, preventing flow induced vibration from damaging the cables.
The illustrative nuclear is a compact small modular reactor (SMR) including integral steam generators and also internal control rod drive mechanisms (internal CRDMs) disposed inside the pressure vessel. Additionally, the illustrative SMR is a pressurized water reactor (PWR) that includes an internal pressurizer defined by a steam bubble at the top of the upper vessel 8, with pressure controlled by suitable inputs such a resistive heaters for heating/expanding the steam bubble and spargers for cooling/contracting the steam bubble (details not shown). Routing incore instrumentation cabling from above and around or through the internal pressurizer, internal steam generators, and internal CRDMs would be challenging. Running cabling through the CRDMs also poses a problem during refueling because the cabling will typically need to be removed to facilitate removal of the CRDMs in order to access the reactor core. Routing incore cabling through the bottom of the pressure vessel is also undesirable because it requires penetrations below the reactor core, which is problematic from a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) management standpoint. While routing incore cabling from above or below is particularly problematic for a SMR due to its compactness, similar incore cable routing problems arise in the context of other types of nuclear reactors.
It is disclosed herein to route the incore instrumentation cabling from a side port. For example, the incore instrumentation cabling may be ported through the pressure vessel via feedthroughs at or near the mid-flange 14 and routed downward. This routing advantageously places the incore feedthroughs above the reactor core 18 while also avoiding routing the incore cables centrally through the upper internals 16. The routing does include a relatively sharp 90° downward turn of the cabling proximate to the mid-flange 14. However, the requisite bend radius of the incore cables is generally well within tolerances for most MI cables (e.g., a typical MI cable has a bend radius on the order of 18 inches), and moreover this region is relatively easy to access during an opening in which the upper vessel 8 has been removed.
In some embodiments, the cables entering at the mid-flange 14 are routed downward (for example, through the annulus defined between the core basket 22 and the lower pressure vessel 10, suitably secure to the periphery of the upper internals structural skeleton or to an inside wall of the lower vessel 10) to the bottom of the reactor vessel and then back up into the reactor core 18 from below. In these embodiments, the 180° turn of the incore cables at the bottom of the pressure vessel in order to enter the reactor core 18 from below raises a particular routing issue. This is a relatively sharp turn, and moreover the region below the reactor core 18 is not readily accessible even when the upper vessel 8 has been removed. Moreover, the upward cable portion of each incore cable must be precisely aligned with the receiving guide tube of the reactor core 18 in order to enter it. (As used in this context, the term “180° turn” denotes the turn in the incore cable that transitions between the portion of the cable running vertically in the guide tube of the reactor core and the portion of the cable routed from the bottom of the reactor core to an incore feedthrough located above the reactor core. The detailed shape of the 180° turn can vary, for example optionally having a nonuniform arc along its path, optionally having a tilt to accommodate a slightly slanted upward path between the 180° turn and the feedthrough, or so forth.)
As disclosed herein, the 180° cabling turn is facilitated through the use of a bottom support element 24 (shown in isolation via partial cutaway of the lower vessel 10 in
The illustrated three contemplated locations for the side-entry vessel penetrations are: through the mid-flange at level 30, through the top of the lower vessel at level 32, and below the support skirt through the vessel at level 34. The embodiment with the incore penetrations at level 30 is depicted in
In embodiments in which the incores penetrate the lower vessel flange 35 at level 32 and are routed to the bottom of the core, the incores can remain installed even if the mid-flange 14 is removed from the lower vessel 10. Indeed, the incores can even remain installed during refueling as the fuel assemblies are removed and replaced. This is suitably accomplished by retracting the incore and associated mineral insulated cables from the guide tubes of the core, so that the incore instruments at the distal ends of the incore cables reside inside routing tubes of the bottom support element 24.
As another contemplated approach, incore vessel penetrations 34 can be located at a lower location, which may be advantageous if the mid-flange 14 is too thick to machine feedthroughs (or is omitted entirely) and the vessel wall near the mid-flange is also thick. The total length of cabling is also reduced. The incore vessel penetrations are preferably located above the top of the core (indicated by level 36 in diagrammatic
The incore penetrations may be evenly spaced circumferentially around the lower vessel 10 or mid-flange 14. Depending upon the vessel penetration configuration, there may be multiple incore cables entering at each penetration, so as to decrease the total number of vessel penetrations. The incores may enter the reactor horizontally or at an angle. If the incores enter at an angle, the angle is preferably slanted downward from outside to inside, that is, slanting towards the reactor core 18 at the bottom of the vessel, so as to make the bend angle of the routing tube and incore cable less severe as it turns from the vessel penetration downward toward the core.
From the mid-flange or lower vessel wall, the incores, contained in routing tubes, are routed vertically to enter the core from either the top or the bottom. A suitable arrangement in which the incore cabling enters the core from the top is shown in
One issue that potentially can arise is interference between the incore routes and the moving control rod assemblies. In the illustrative reactor, each fuel assembly has its own control rod assembly driven by its on control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) unit. In other words, there is a one-to-one correspondence between fuel assembly and CRDM unit,
The illustrative arrangements of
Returning momentarily to
If routed through the lower vessel flange 32 or lower vessel wall and then to the bottom of the core, the incores may remain in the reactor vessel during refueling, sufficiently submerged in water to limit the radiation dose to personnel. This is accomplished by pulling or otherwise retracting the incore cabling from the core by a length sufficient to withdraw the incore instrument out of the guide tube of the reactor core 18 and into the routing tube secured to (or integral with) the bottom support element 24. The fuel assemblies 19 making up the reactor core 18 can then be removed from the core basket 22 and new fuel assemblies loaded into the core basket. (Alternatively, the operation may entail fuel shuffling in which the fuel elements are removed and replaced at different locations, i.e. shuffled, to enhance uniformity of fuel burn over the volume of the core). After the refueling (or fuel shuffling) operation is completed, the incore cabling can be inserted back into the guide tubes of the new or shuffled fuel assemblies. With the bottom support element 24 secured to the bottom of the core basket 22, precise alignment between the routing tubes of the bottom support element 24 ad the guide tubes of the fuel assemblies 19 is ensured, thus enabling this reinsertion of the incore instruments to be done in a “blind” fashion, e.g. by pushing the cables inward at the vessel penetration so that the cable and the incore instrument at the distal end of the cable are pushed into the guide tube of the reactor core.
While this installation is described as “blind”, it is contemplated to monitor readings generated by the incore instrument to determine accurate placement of the incore instrument in the reactor core. For example, a radiation level sensor may be expected to produce maximum signal when the instrument is centered inside the fuel assembly. Additionally or alternatively, the blind installation can rely upon a known penetration distance—for example, if the cable is retracted a distance “x” to place the instrument inside the routing tube of the bottom support element 24 during commencement of refueling (or shuffling), then inserting the cable by the distance “x” should place the instrument back into its correct position inside the core.
During operation of the nuclear reactor, the bottom support element 24 provides support for the portion of the routing tube that guides the 180° cable turn. This is advantageous because the routing tubes are relatively flexible and susceptible to flow induced vibration.
In the embodiment of
The support element 24 does not support the reactor core or core basket during normal operation. Rather, it serves to support the routing tubes as they make the (gradual) 180° turn into the guide tube of the reactor core. However, the bottom support element 24 optionally also functions as an “emergency” core support in the event of an abnormal event that causes the core basket support to fail. If the core basket were to become dislodged, the support element would keep the core raised off the vessel floor enough to allow natural circulation to continue to circulate water through the core. This optional emergency core support function assumes the support element 24 is strong enough to support the core and core basket—in some contemplated embodiments the support element is not sturdy enough to perform this function. (Again, it is noted that structural failure of the core basket support is not expected to be a credible failure mode in most reactor designs).
The grid work of the bottom support element 24 allows flow upward into the core via openings 44 (see
When designing the bottom support element 24, one consideration is that the 180° turn of the routing tubes should not exceed the minimum allowable bend radius of the routing tubes or incore cabling. To increase the radius of the 180° turn, routing tubes that descend on one side of the core basket may enter fuel elements on the opposite side of the reactor core 18, crossing other routing tubes in the support element 24. Various layouts can be employed for this purpose. In such an approach with an optimized design, the smallest radius for the 180° turn can be expected for the incore instrument entering the fuel assembly or assemblies located at or nearest the center of the reactor core 18. (This is the example shown in
The bottom support element 24 is suitably attached to the core basket 22 (and, in the illustrative embodiment, more particularly to the lower core plate 26 of the core basket 22) using pins or clamps to allow replacement and removal without major work to the entire core basket. In this approach the bottom support element 24 is a removable module that can be removed from the core basket 22 by removing the horizontal pins that keep it connected to the core basket, allowing it to be replaced or repaired if needed. The pins may be cap welded to prevent backing out. To remove the structure, the welds would be cut and the pins removed. It is also contemplated that bolts could be used, although irradiation (or hydrogen) embrittlement of threaded fasteners is a concern in nuclear components. The bottom support element 24 can alternatively be welded to the lower core plate 26, though welds would make it difficult to remove the structure for repair or replacement and may alter the properties of the metal. Additionally, some welds may be adversely affected by high radiation from the proximate reactor core 18.
In this regard, in some embodiments the bottom support element 24 does not include any welds, but rather is manufactured as a single-piece element by machining a blank, or by casting, forging, or another suitable process. The bottom support element 24 is suitably made of any structural material compatible with the nuclear reactor environment, such as being made of stainless steel, Inconel, or so forth.
The egg crate grid of the illustrative support element 24 is rectilinear in plan view and suitably supports a rectilinear (in plan view) arrangement of routing tubes. However, non-rectilinear plan view configurations are also contemplated.
With reference to
With reference to
It should be noted that the side-entry vessel penetration 30A with a declination angle AE and the routing tube 28 including a 90°−AE downward turn toward the reactor core, as shown in
The preferred embodiments have been illustrated and described. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/625,744, filed Apr. 18, 2012. U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/625,744, filed Apr. 18, 2012, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the specification of this application.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61625744 | Apr 2012 | US |