This invention relates to methods to create a biomaterial of increased homogeneity, strength and density as compared to the mycological biopolymer described in published US Patent Application US 2015/0033620 (A).
As described in published US Patent Application US 2015/0033620 (A), the environmental conditions for producing the mycological biopolymer product, i.e. a high carbon dioxide (CO2) content (from 5% to 7% by volume) and an elevated temperature (from 85° F. to 95° F.), prevent full differentiation of the fungus into a mushroom. There are no stipe, cap, or spores produced. The elevated temperature accelerates tissue production. The biopolymer product grows into the void space of the tool, filling the space with an undifferentiated mycelium chitin-polymer, which is subsequently extracted from the substrate and dried.
Briefly, the invention allows for the production of a tough, pliable material that could be used to replace leather, leather-like materials, textiles and high density and strength foams in many applications such as upholstery, apparel/fashion, military gear, athletic gear, and footwear.
The invention involves growing a mycological biopolymer under conditions of directed airflow, depositing moisture and solutes, such as minerals, on the surface of the growing organism, growth through a scrim or lofted non-substrate matrix, and fluctuation of the humidity profile throughout growth to induce more homogenous material and produce a range of material densities. The mycological biopolymer product consists entirely of fungal mycelium.
One embodiment of the invention is the placement of contained inoculated growth media used to produce mycological biopolymer within a growth enclosure equipped to deliver a directed airflow across at least one of the surfaces of the growth media.
In this embodiment, the method of growing a biopolymer material comprises the steps of providing a plurality of containers, each of which defines a cavity containing a growth media comprised of nutritive substrate and a fungus; placing the containers in a closed incubation chamber; maintaining the incubation chamber with a predetermined environment of humidity, temperature, carbon dioxide and oxygen sufficient to produce a mycelium biopolymer while preventing full differentiation of said fungus into a mushroom; directing flows of air containing a high carbon dioxide content through the incubation chamber for passage over the growth media in each container; and incubating the growth media in each container for a period of time sufficient for the fungus to digest the nutritive substrate and produce a mycelium biopolymer consisting entirely of fungal mycelium in each container.
Each container may be placed within the incubation chamber within an “airflow box” such that the height of the container interacts with the airflow or each container may be sunk into the airflow box such that the total cross-sectional area of the box can be employed.
In accordance with the invention, the flows of air are directed into the closed incubation chamber laterally of the containers or perpendicularly of the containers.
A second embodiment of the invention employs the controlled deposition of moisture and minerals on at least one of the growing surfaces to induce homogeneity with a range of densities based on the moisture and mineral deposition volume.
In this embodiment, the method of growing a biopolymer material comprises the steps of providing a plurality of containers, each of which defines a cavity containing a growth media comprised of nutritive substrate and a fungus; placing the plurality of containers in a closed incubation chamber; maintaining the incubation chamber with a predetermined environment of humidity, temperature, carbon dioxide and oxygen sufficient to produce a mycelium biopolymer while preventing full differentiation of said fungus into a mushroom; distributing a mist through the incubation chamber for passage over the growth media in each container; and incubating the growth media in each container for a period of time sufficient to produce a mycelium biopolymer in each container.
In accordance with the invention, the mist includes moisture and a solute, such as minerals.
A third embodiment of the invention involves the growth of a mycological biopolymer through a scrim or lofted non-substrate matrix that is in direct contact or elevated above the substrate growth surface and grown in a container without the use of a lid.
A fourth embodiment employs the fluctuation of the percent humidity at time periods of growth throughout the duration of the cycle in order to induce a higher density material of increased homogeneity.
A fifth embodiment uses specific air flow rates to achieve a range of aerial mycelium densities and mechanical performances.
In all the embodiments of the invention, the mycological biopolymer is grown from a nutritious substrate, and grows into a panel at a dry density of 0.5 to 4 pounds per cubic foot. The localized environmental conditions, i.e. high carbon dioxide air, moisture deposition and temperature, must be homogenous, except for the embodiment using a scrim or lofted non-substrate matrix, in order to achieve uniform growth within each panel and throughout the larger growing chamber.
As further described in published US Patent Application US 2015/0033620 (A) the use of a lid was enlisted to control the localized environmental conditions influencing the growth of the mycological biopolymer.
In accordance with the invention, under directed airflow, the lid on the container is removed and the localized environmental conditions are homogenized via airflow. The use of airflow allows for growth from the full surface of the growth container and helps to improve the homogeneity and uniformity of the tissue grown. This may be attributed to the airflow facilitating the delivery of humidity, water and solutes, such as minerals, to the growing tissue, elimination of microenvironments, and/or increased mechanical force. There are many applications for a biological textile and foam that require increased volume of homogenous material.
The growth environments used in the production of edible mushrooms, both specialty and Agaricus currently employ the use of some uncontrolled airflow through the growth chambers for heating, cooling, of gassing carbon dioxide produced by the growing mushrooms or introducing oxygen into the growing chamber. This differs from the airflow technology employed to prevent any and all differentiation of the fungus into a fruiting body that makes an edible mushroom while providing a uniform environment to grow mycological biopolymer
Further, airflow within the cultivation of mushrooms is directed at removing metabolic byproducts such as carbon dioxide and other volatiles, and is intermittent in nature. The airflow employed to grow mycological biopolymer is directed at providing a consistent homogenization of the incubation environment without localized variations that has sufficiently controlled parameters (e.g., high carbon dioxide) such that the mycelium cannot differentiate into a mushroom. Also, the airflow velocity provides a directed force that modulates the structure of the aerial mycelium, impacting density.
While the growth environments used in the production of edible mushrooms can employ the use of an airflow through the growth chambers, the air flow is indirect and part of a recirculating system for humidification of the environment. The airflow is not directed across the surface of the growth media as is the case in accordance with the invention.
These and other objects and advantages will become more apparent from the following detailed description taken with the accompanying drawings wherein:
FIG. 3A1 schematically illustrates a lateral airflow system in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 3A2 illustrates a perspective view of an air box used for the incubation of two containers in accordance with the invention
Referring to FIG. 3A1, in a first embodiment, the method of growing a biopolymer material employs a closed incubation chamber 10 having a plurality of vertically spaced apart shelves 11 and transparent front walls (not shown) for viewing the interior of the chamber 10.
In addition, an air flow system 12 is connected with the chamber 10 for directing air flows laterally across the chamber 10 as indicated by the arrows 13 from one side of the chamber 10 to and through the opposite side of the chamber 10. As illustrated, the air flow system 12 includes a manifold M in the upper part of the chamber 10 for distributing humidified air across the top of the chamber 10 for cascading down the shelves 11 until being recirculated on the bottom right for re-humidification.
Each shelf 11 of the chamber 10 is sized to receive an air box B that contains two containers 14 each of which contains a growth media 15 comprised of nutritive substrate and a fungus.
Referring to FIG. 3A2, each container 14 is in the form of a rectangular tray with an open top to define a cavity of a size of 11.5 inches by 18.5 inches with a 1 inch lip around the entire container that extends externally outwardly of the cavity. Each container is placed within the air box B.
The containers 14 are constructed from a sufficiently rigid, non-reactive material, such as polycarbonate, and the orifice of the container is such that it is paired with the airflow device to achieve the desired air flow rates. The length of the container along with the airflow rates dictate the consistency of this flow, and the entrance length before the airflow reaches the growing part is impart to control the laminar or turbid nature of the flow. The containers can include ramps, fairings, such as airfoils, or baffles, to assist in homogenizing the flow.
The air box B is of rectangular shape that receives the growth trays 14 and has an open side 16 in one end face and a smaller orifice 17 in an opposite end face.
The air flow system 12 includes a fan 12′ situated at the orifice 17 of each air box B to pull air over the growth media 15 in the containers 14 and growing part as indicated by the horizontal arrows. The orifice is covered by the fan to ensure all of the air moves through the fan. Alternatively, the fan 12′ may be positioned at the open side 16 of the air box B to push air over the growth media 15.
As indicated, the humidified air cascading down from the manifold M passes into and through each air box B via the orifices 16, 17.
Specifically, the growth media 15 comprises:
During the method of growing a biopolymer material, the incubation chamber 10 is maintained with a predetermined environment of humidity, temperature, carbon dioxide and oxygen. Specifically, the chamber 10 is maintained at 99% relative humidity (RH), 5% CO2, and a fluctuating temperature of from 85° F. to 90° F. during the step of incubating.
The incubation chamber 10, i.e. growth enclosure, can be open on one end and on the other can be outfitted with fans or apparatuses for moving air over the containers 14 in a lateral direction as indicated by the arrows 13 either by pulling or pushing air at speeds ranging from 5 CFM to 10,000 CFM steadily or in a pulsing fashion. The incubation chamber 10 can be within a larger incubation chamber (not shown) that is able to maintain environmental conditions including humidity, temperature, carbon dioxide and oxygen.
The shape and construction of the incubation chamber 10 can be specially crafted to assist in directing the air flow and laminar or turbid characteristics of the air flow.
Process Steps (see FIG. 3A1)
Directed Lateral Airflow
The flows of air are generated by fans outfitted to the incubation chamber 10 and are directed over the containers 14 and back into the greater incubation space.
Referring to
Airflow rates of 100 cubic feet per minute at a constant RH of >99% resulted in tissue with a dry density of 1.98 pcf and a tensile strength of 17.5 psi. These panels offered a high degree of consistency.
Airflow rates of 100-175 cubic feet per minute and relative humidity drop to 96% for a period of 48 hours resulted in tissue with a dry density of 1.45 pcf and a tensile strength of 13.6 psi. These grown panels resulted in a high degree of consistency.
Airflow speeds of 300-350 cubic feet per minute and at a constant RH of >99% resulted in tissue with a dry density of 3.32 pcf and a tensile strength of 31.2 psi.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In addition, the incubation chamber 10 is outfitted with a lateral airflow system 12′ having fans fitted to the chamber 10′ to direct airflow from the incubation environment through the air boxes B and over the containers 14 and back into the greater incubation space as indicated by the arrows 18.
Referring to
Referring to
For example, the enclosed incubation chamber 10″ may be constructed with one or more air flow devices (not shown) positioned above the nutritive media 15 to push or pull conditioned air over the growing mycelium. The air flow device 12 as in FIG. 3A1 is either held static at a desired height above the growth container 14′ or modulated on linear actuators (not shown) through the course of growth.
As illustrated, two containers 14′ are positioned on each shelf 11 within the incubation chamber 10″ and each container 14′ is provided with vertical standoffs 18 that space a cover 19 (roof) from a container 14′. The vertical standoffs 18 are fabricated from a non-reactive substance, such as polyvinylchloride (PVC), and are sufficiently rigid to resist the forces of the airflow device.
The incubation chamber 10″, can be open on one end and on the other can be outfitted with fans or apparatuses for moving air over the containers 14′ in a direction perpendicular to the growing surface as indicated by the arrows 13″ either by pulling or pushing air at speeds ranging from 5 CFM to 10,000 CFM steadily or in a pulsing fashion.
The incubation chamber 10″ can be within a larger incubation chamber (not shown) that is able to maintain environmental conditions including humidity, temperature, carbon dioxide and oxygen.
Referring to
Directed Perpendicular Airflow (See
In Step 6 above, pulled horizontal airflow velocity (>175 cfm) creates a dense scalloped pattern. Vertical airflow creates structures below the airflow device presenting a morphology that parities the airflow (pulled upward like a stalagmite). Pushing creates wave patterns opposing the airflow (160 CFM). Proximity to the airflow device and the pattern of airflow generates tissue patterns that mimic the flow.
Referring to
Tukey Kramer is a mean (average) comparison test that determines the significant difference between tests. The 0.05 is the confidence interval, so there is a 95% confidence in the relationship between the data.
The ability for fungal cells to fill the void space is dependent on the water and solutes available to the organism during growth. The more water available, the more aggressively the organism can expand, causing the density of the material to drop.
Accordingly, referring to
As illustrated, the incubation chamber 20 has a plurality of vertically spaced apart shelves 21 and transparent front walls (not shown) for viewing the interior of the chamber 20. The incubation chamber 20 is sized to receive a plurality of containers 14, each filled with a growth media 15.
As above, the incubation chamber 20 can be placed within larger incubation chambers that are able to maintain uniform environmental conditions including humidity, temperature, carbon dioxide and oxygen.
The mist distribution system 21 is positioned to deliver moisture and solutes, such as minerals, to the top of the growing tissue in each container 14 and can also be used to control the material density and regulate the homogeneity of the material. This material is comprised of aerial hypha growing up and out of a nutritious space into a non-nutrient environment. In order to control growth in such an environment, the organism employs the use of turgor pressure to regulate the extension of the hyphae at the apex, or hyphal tip. Thus, regulating the amount, distribution and/or droplet size of available moisture and solutes deposited across the top surface of the growing material can control the osmotic gradient created within the hyphae and subsequently, its growth rate and pattern of colonization.
Solutes are any agent that can cause an osmotic potential. RO (reverse osmosis) or distilled water are free of such agents. Other solutes could include proteins, carbohydrates, polymers, and minerals.
A solute is a material that induces an osmotic potential within a solution. A solute can be a mineral, a carbohydrate, a protein, or lipid. Concentrations of a solute on one side of a membrane, such as a cell membrane and/or wall, will drive a potential across the membrane if the solution on the opposing side of the membrane has a lesser concentration of the solute.
Moisture and solute deposition can be employed to achieve specific material densities and increase material homogeneity.
Moisture and solutes can be distributed across the growing surface of the growth media using a bath of water outfitted with a “humidifying puck” that atomizes the water into vapor or mist. A “humidifying puck” is an ultrasonic humidifier which produces low quality, high liquid content, droplets of a size range of 5 to 22 microns. The liquid water droplet, opposed to vapor, is important as the droplet can carry a solute. The same is true for sprays or bubblers, but cannot be achieved with steam. Steam can be used to regulate humidity, but not as a substitute for water carrying the solutes.
This mist can be distributed across the surface of the growth media using indirect airflow from a fan or similar apparatus or by a spray nozzle that can be outfitted with compressed air or other means of expelling the moisture out of the nozzle and directed at the growing surface of the growth media.
The amount of moisture and minerals, the distribution, and the droplet size can be regulated to produce a homogenous mycelium biopolymer of varying densities.
Fluctuation of the percent humidity during the growth cycle can be employed as a method to increase the density and homogeneity of the material. In the method described in the published US 2015/0033620 A, the humidity was held static throughout the duration of the growth cycle to achieve material growth. By altering this paradigm and fluctuating the humidity of the growth chamber at targeted stages during the growth cycle, the density and homogeneity can be increased.
A moist environment is generally necessary for fungi to grow aggressively. When a desiccating environment is encountered, many species of fungi have developed methods to protect themselves against moisture loss. For aerial hyphae, a localized high humidity environment is necessary to allow for continued expansion and prevent collapse of the hyphae towards the growing surface. Fluctuation of the humidity in the growth chamber can be used to trigger physiological responses of the organism to a desiccating environment as well as to manipulate the aerial hyphal growth in order to achieve the desired material characteristics.
A system design allowing for the controlled deposition of mist onto the growing material without the use of airflow was prototyped and tested employing the incubation chamber of
The atomizer misting system was set up with the nozzle positioned 26.5 inches in from the incubator wall to the right side of the target growth surface. The nozzle was affixed at a 45-degree angle to the shelf 11 above the target container 14 and rotated 90-degrees, resulting in a vertically oriented fan-shaped spray pattern. The target total volume of moisture of 0.28 microsiemens per centimeter (uS/cm) per minute plus/minus seven microsiemens per centimeter (uS/cm) as well as target deviation in moisture across the panel surface of 0.00014 g/min was achieved using a misting paradigm of 2.4% time misting over a 1 minute period. The target volume was based on TDS values collected for the direct, high airflow incubations system of FIG. 3A1.
This atomizer misting system was trialed with biomass to assess the impact of moisture deposition independent from airflow. Seven parts were loaded into a lab incubator equipped with the atomizer misting system without any airflow (
Humidification of this system was achieved by the moisture input into the system via the atomizer.
Two control incubators were run simultaneously using the standard biopolymer humidification system and environmental conditions. One control incubator was set up using the standard direct, high airflow box system and the humidification recirculation system (FIG. 3A1) while the other was equipped with only the low, indirect airflow used for the recirculation of humidified air (
Direct, high airflow resulted in increased homogeneity of growth within the panels across the entire incubator and allowed the production of the panels of
The zero-airflow incubator equipped with the atomizer misting system resulted in highly differentiated panels with a low volume of vertical growth (
The low, indirect airflow incubator also resulted in highly differentiated material and reduced aerial growth; however, the volume of vertical growth was increased (
Further, the panel of
The high, direct airflow growth environment resulted in panels that were significantly more homogenous, with minimal differentiation throughout the panels (
Process Steps
Moisture and Mineral Deposition on Material Surface During Growth
Tests were conducted to determine the effect of regulating the moisture and minerals within a substrate (growth media) prior to incubation in an enclosed incubation chamber with respect to the density of a produced panel of mycological biopolymer.
One test used the following steps:
The result of the test was that the amount of moisture and minerals within the growth media prior to placement in the incubation chamber can be regulated to produce a homogenous panel of mycological biopolymer of a desired density. Of note, moisture contents of 65% on corn stover substrate resulted in densities of 1.7 pcf, and moisture contents of 55% resulted in densities of 2.7 pcf.
In another embodiment, the mycological biopolymer may be grown through a scrim or lofted non-substrate matrix. In this embodiment, the scrim or lofted non-substrate matrix is either organic or inorganic in nature and offers sufficient porosity such that the mycelium can infiltrate the material. The scrim or lofted non-substrate matrix is positioned on or above the nutritive substrate and the entire assembly is incubated in one of the configurations above. The scrim or lofted material serves as reinforcement to the mycelium, a means of oriented and directing tissue growth, a method for consistently removing the grown tissue from the nutritive substrate, or a combination thereof.
In a fourth embodiment, the fluctuation of the percent humidity at time periods of growth throughout the duration of the cycle is employed in order to induce a higher density material of increased homogeneity. In this embodiment, the relative humidity is sustained at a high percentage during the period of aerial mycelium induction, which can begin between day 0 and 5 of growth. Once induced, the humidity is reduced to less than 98% for a period of 4 to 72 hours to induce a densification of the apical tissue. The humidity can then again be elevated to induce newly differentiated growth to provide a range of density, tissue morphology, and orientation through the cross-section of the product. This can be repeated as many times as necessary to garner desired variations in performance through the mycological foam.
In a fifth embodiment, specific air flow rates are used to achieve a range of aerial mycelium densities and mechanical performances. In this embodiment, the air flow can be set at a constant rate, such that the air flow velocity is passively modulated at the tissue grows, or the rate can be adjusted through the course of incubation to deliver a constant rate over the growing tissue. Higher airflow rates have demonstrated the production of denser tissues, while lower airflow rates result in a higher loft of tissue that is less dense when dried.
This is a Non-Provisional patent Application and claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application 62/707,704, filed Nov. 14, 2017.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1979176 | Schicht | Oct 1934 | A |
2509984 | Morrow | May 1950 | A |
2657647 | Rapisarda | Nov 1953 | A |
2723493 | Stoller | Nov 1955 | A |
2815621 | Carter | Dec 1957 | A |
2964070 | Linhardt | Dec 1960 | A |
3268606 | Jaeger | Aug 1966 | A |
3316592 | Forrest | May 1967 | A |
3317375 | Molinet et al. | May 1967 | A |
3421554 | Carter | Jan 1969 | A |
3477558 | Fleischauer | Nov 1969 | A |
3499261 | Hullhorst et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3708952 | Schulze et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3717953 | Kuhn et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3782033 | Hickerson | Jan 1974 | A |
3810327 | Giansante | May 1974 | A |
3828470 | Stoller | Aug 1974 | A |
3961938 | Iizuka et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4027427 | Stoller et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4036122 | Langen | Jul 1977 | A |
4038807 | Beardsley et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4063383 | Green | Dec 1977 | A |
4073956 | Yates | Feb 1978 | A |
4127965 | Mee | Dec 1978 | A |
4136767 | Sarovich | Jan 1979 | A |
4226330 | Butler | Oct 1980 | A |
4263744 | Stoller | Apr 1981 | A |
4265915 | MacLennan et al. | May 1981 | A |
4294929 | Solomons et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4337594 | Hanacek et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4370159 | Holtz | Jan 1983 | A |
4568520 | Ackermann et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4620826 | Rubio et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4716712 | Gill | Jan 1988 | A |
4722159 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4878312 | Shimizu | Nov 1989 | A |
4922650 | Akao et al. | May 1990 | A |
4960413 | Sagar et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5021350 | Jung et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5030425 | Bowers-Irons et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5074959 | Yamanaka et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5085998 | Lebron et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5088860 | Stockdale et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5123203 | Hiromoto | Jun 1992 | A |
5230430 | Kidder | Jul 1993 | A |
5306550 | Nishiyama et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5335770 | Baker et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5370714 | Ogawa | Dec 1994 | A |
5433061 | Hutchinson et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440860 | Meli et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5475479 | Hatakeyama et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5498384 | Volk et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503647 | Dahlberg et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511358 | Morita et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5532217 | Silver et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5569426 | Le Blanc | Oct 1996 | A |
5589390 | Higuchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590489 | Hattori et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598876 | Zanini et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606836 | Insalaco et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5647180 | Billings et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5681738 | Beelman et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682929 | Maginot et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5685124 | Jandl | Nov 1997 | A |
5711353 | Ichikawa et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5802763 | Milstein | Sep 1998 | A |
5854056 | Dschida | Dec 1998 | A |
5888803 | Starkey | Mar 1999 | A |
5897887 | Haeberli | Apr 1999 | A |
5919507 | Beelman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5944928 | Seidner | Aug 1999 | A |
5948674 | Mankiewicz | Sep 1999 | A |
5979109 | Sartor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6041544 | Kananen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041835 | Price | Mar 2000 | A |
6098677 | Wegman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112504 | McGregor et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6197573 | Suryanarayan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226962 | Eason et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6300315 | Liu | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306921 | Ghatta et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329185 | Kofod et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349988 | Foster et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6402953 | Gorovoj et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425714 | Waddell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6471993 | Shastri et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475811 | Babcock | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482942 | Vittori | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491480 | Waddell | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500476 | Martin et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6523721 | Nomoto et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6603054 | Chen et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620614 | Lüth et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6660164 | Stover | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6679301 | Makino et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6726911 | Jülich et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7043874 | Wasser et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7073306 | Hagaman | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7122176 | Stamets | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7179356 | Aksay et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7395643 | Franchini et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7514248 | Gower et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7573031 | Behar et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7621300 | Bonney et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7661248 | Conti et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7754653 | Hintz | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7836921 | Isomura et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8001719 | Bayer et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8205646 | Isomura et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8227224 | Kalisz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227233 | Kalisz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241415 | Wantling et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8298810 | Rocco et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8313939 | Kalisz et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8517064 | Isomura et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8658407 | Lyons et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8763653 | Weigel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8999687 | Bayer et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9079978 | Räsänen et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9085763 | Winiski et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9253889 | Bayer et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9332779 | Marga | May 2016 | B2 |
9394512 | Bayer et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9469838 | Schaak et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9485917 | Bayer et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9555395 | Araldi et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9714180 | McIntyre et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9752122 | Marga et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9795088 | Bayer et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9801345 | Bayer et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9803171 | Bayer et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9879219 | McIntyre et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9914906 | Winiski et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10125347 | Winiski | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10144149 | Araldi et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10154627 | McIntyre et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10172301 | McNamara et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10266695 | Lucht et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10407675 | Bayer et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10525662 | Bayer et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10537070 | Betts et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10583626 | Bayer et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10589489 | Bayer et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10687482 | Ross et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10785925 | McNamara et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20010012235 | Schuchardt | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020110427 | Waddell | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131828 | Waddell | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131933 | Delmotte | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030017565 | Echigo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030056451 | Pisek et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030121201 | Dahlberg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030232895 | Omidian et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000090 | Miller | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020553 | Amano | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040166576 | Sadaie | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177585 | Vermette | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050133536 | Kelsey et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137272 | Gaserod et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060134265 | Beukes | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060280753 | McNeary | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070079944 | Amidon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070196509 | Riman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225328 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227063 | Dale et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070294939 | Spear et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080017272 | Isomura et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046277 | Stamets | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047966 | Carson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080145577 | Bayer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080234210 | Rijn et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080295399 | Kawai et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080296295 | Kords et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090107040 | Vandnhove | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090191289 | Lutz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241623 | Matano et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090246467 | Delantar | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272758 | Karwacki et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307969 | Bayer et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321975 | Schlummer | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100101190 | Dillon | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100158976 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159509 | Xu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100199601 | Boldrini et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100227931 | Kuwano et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243135 | Pepper et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100326564 | Isomura et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110094154 | Joaquin | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110108158 | Huwiler et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110265688 | Kalisz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110268980 | Kalisz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110269209 | Rocco et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110269214 | Kalisz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110306107 | Kalisz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000165 | Williams | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120006446 | Isomura et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120060446 | Merz | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120076895 | Kirejevas et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120115199 | Li et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132314 | Weigel et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135504 | Ross | May 2012 | A1 |
20120225471 | McIntyre et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120227899 | McIntyre et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120231140 | Hofmann et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120270031 | Guan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270302 | Bayer et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120315687 | Bayer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130095560 | McIntyre et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130105036 | Smith et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130210327 | Corominas | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224840 | Bayer et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130274892 | Lelkes et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130309755 | McIntyre et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140038619 | Moulsley | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140056653 | Scully et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140069004 | Bayer et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140093618 | Forgacs et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140173977 | Juscius | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140186927 | Winiski et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140371352 | Dantin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150033620 | Greetham | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150038619 | McIntyre et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150101509 | McIntyre et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150197358 | Larsen | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150342138 | Bayer et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150342224 | Medoff | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160002589 | Winiski | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160264926 | Winiski et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160355779 | Ross | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170000040 | Bayer et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170028600 | McIntyre et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170071214 | Rehage | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170218327 | Amstislavski et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170253849 | Miller et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170253852 | Bayer et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180014468 | Ross et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180148682 | Ross et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180282529 | Kaplan-Bie | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180368337 | McIntyre et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190059431 | Kozubal et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190090436 | Betts et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190284307 | Chase et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190322997 | Schaak | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190330668 | Kozubal et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190338240 | Carlton et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190357454 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190359931 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190390156 | Bayer et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200024577 | Carlton et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200025672 | Scullin et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200055274 | Bayer et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200095535 | Kozubal et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200102530 | Winiski et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200157506 | Bayer et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200208097 | Winiski | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200239830 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200268031 | Macur et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200270559 | Macur et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200392341 | Smith et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1059662 | Mar 1992 | CN |
1732887 | Feb 2006 | CN |
101248869 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101653081 | Feb 2010 | CN |
106947702 | Jul 2017 | CN |
0226292 | Jun 1987 | EP |
1312547 | May 2003 | EP |
2677030 | Dec 2013 | EP |
2735318 | May 2014 | EP |
2875805 | May 2015 | EP |
2878340 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2485779 | Feb 2018 | EP |
3292769 | Mar 2018 | EP |
142800 | Jan 1921 | GB |
1525484 | Sep 1978 | GB |
2032456 | May 1980 | GB |
2165865 | Apr 1986 | GB |
358266 | Jul 2020 | IN |
H03234889 | Oct 1991 | JP |
H049316 | Jan 1992 | JP |
6111510 | Apr 2017 | JP |
20050001175 | Jan 2005 | KR |
101851655 | Apr 2018 | KR |
WO 1999024555 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 2001087045 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2005067977 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2008025122 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008073489 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2010005476 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2012122092 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2014031810 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014039938 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2014195641 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2016149002 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2016168563 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2017056059 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO 2017120342 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO 2017136950 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2017151684 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO 2017205750 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO 2018011805 | Jan 2018 | WO |
WO 2018014004 | Jan 2018 | WO |
WO 2018064968 | Apr 2018 | WO |
WO 2018183735 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO 2018189738 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO 2019046480 | Mar 2019 | WO |
WO 2019099474 | May 2019 | WO |
WO 2019178406 | Sep 2019 | WO |
WO 2019217175 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO 2019226823 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO 2019246636 | Dec 2019 | WO |
WO 2020023450 | Jan 2020 | WO |
WO 2020072140 | Apr 2020 | WO |
WO 2020082043 | Apr 2020 | WO |
WO 2020082044 | Apr 2020 | WO |
WO 2020102552 | May 2020 | WO |
WO 2020106743 | May 2020 | WO |
WO 2020176758 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO 2020186068 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO 2020186169 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO 2020237201 | Nov 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PhpBB SHOPSMITH Forums, “Cracks in wide paneling boards”, Excerpt from Oct. 28, 2017, downloaded from URL <https://www.shopsmith.com/ss_forum/viewtopic.php?p=214601>; 2 pages. |
Griffin et al., “Regulation of macromolecular synthesis, colony development and specific growth rate of Achlya bisexualis during balanced growth”. J General Microbiol. (1974) 80(2): 381-388. |
Haneef et al., “Advanced Materials from Fungal Mycelium: Fabrication and Tuning of Physical Properties”, Scientific Reports 7(1): 1-11; DOI: 10.1038/srep41292, Jan. 24, 2017. |
Heisig et al., USGS, “Ground-Water Resources of the Clifton Park Area, Saratoga County, New York”, 2002, retrieved from the internet (Oct. 15, 2016): http://ny.water.usgs.gov/pubs/wri/wri014104/wrir01-4104.pdf. |
Instructables, How to Grow Oyster Mushroom Spawn (Low Tech), retrieved from the internet Aug. 19, 2018: http://www.instructables.com/id/1-How-to-Grow-Oyster-Mushroom-Spawn-Low-Tech/. |
Zadrazil et al., “Influence of CO2 Concentration on the Mycelium Growth of Three Pleurotus Species”, European J. Appl. Microbiol., vol. 1, pp. 327-335 (1975). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2018/060983, dated Jan. 24, 2019. |
Appels et al., “Hydrophobin gene deletion and environmental growth conditions impact mechanical properties of mycelium by affecting the density of the material”, Scientific Reports 8:4703 DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-23171-2, Mar. 16, 2018. |
Jones et al., “Leather-like material biofabrication using fungi”, Nature Sustainability (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00606-1, Sep. 7, 2020. |
Howden et al., “The effects of breathing 5% CO2 on human cardiovascular responses and tolerance to orthostatic stress”, Experimental Physiology, vol. 89, Issue 4, pp. 465-471, Jun. 23, 2004. |
Bartnicki-Garcia, “Cell wall chemistry, morphogenesis, and taxonomy of fungi”, Annual Review Microbiol. (1968) 22(1): 87-108. |
Cha et al., “Biomimetic synthesis of ordered silica structures mediated by block copolypeptides”. Nature (2000) 403(6767): 289-292. |
Dugdale J. “This new surf company is making boards of mushrooms”. Blog post—Jun. 25, 2015. |
Halseide P., “Cutting brick the safe way”. The Aberdeen Group (1988) Publication #M880354 in 2 pages. |
Highland Woodworking, “Making Thin Lumber and Veneer Out of Ordinary Boards”, Sales Website (2017) in 3 pages. |
Holt et al., “Biobased Composition Boards Made from Cotton Gin and Guayule Wastes: Select Physical and Mechanical Properties”, Int J Mater Prod Tech. (2009) 36: 104-114. |
Islam et al., “Morphology and mechanics of fungal mycelium”, Scientific Reports, (2017) 7(1): 1-12. |
Kerem et al., “Chemically defined solid-state fermentation of Pleurotus Ostreatus”. Enzyme Microbiol Tech. (1993) 15(9): 785-790. |
Kokubo et al., “Ca,P-rich layer formed on high-strength bioactive glass-ceramic A-W”. J Biomed Mater Res. (1990) 24(3): 331-343. |
Koutsoukos et al., “Precipitation of calcium carbonate in aqueous solutions”. J Chem Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases, (1984) 80(5): 1181-1192. |
Lu et al., “Theoretical Analysis of Calcium Phosphate precipitation in simulated Body Fluid”. Biomaterials (2005) 26(10): 1097-1108—Pre-Pub. Version by Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kowloon; 34 pages. |
Molvinger et al., “Porous chitosan-silica hybrid microspheres as a potential catalyst”. Chem Mater. (2004) 16(17): 3367-3372. |
Monmaturapoj et al., “Influence of preparation method on hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds”. Bull Mater Sci. (2011) 34(7): 1733-1737. |
Manoli et al., “Crystallization of calcite on chitin”. J Cryst Growth, (1997) 182(1-2): 116-124. |
Mushroom Source, “Aspen Wood Shavings for Mushroom Cultivation”, Website (2015) in 2 pages. |
National Institute of Health (NIH/NIBIB), “Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine”, Retrieved Sep. 24, 2018 from https://www.nibib.nih.gov/science-education/science-topics/tissue-engineering-and-regenerative-medicine in 13 pages. |
Passauer U et al., “Pilze in Höhlen” [Cave Mushrooms]. Denisia (2016) 37: 211-224. |
Stewart B., “Concrete Fence Posts: Fact Sheet”, Texas Agriculture Extension Service, Texas A & M University (1975) Article L-1368 in 4 pages. |
Trinci et al., “II. Unrestricted Growth of Fungal Mycelia”, The Mycota—Growth, Differenciation and Sexuality by Wessels et al. [Eds], Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (1994) Chapter II: 175-193. |
Udawatte et al., “Solidification of xonotlite fibers with chitosan by hydrothermal hot pressing”. J Mater Sci. Lttrs. (2000) 45(6): 298-301. |
University of Sydney, “Competition Between Fungi”. Webpage, accessed Jul. 16, 2014—http://bugs.bio.usyd.edu.au/learning/resources/Mycology/Ecology/competition.shtml in 3 pages. |
Varma et al., “Porous calcium phosphate coating over phosphorylated chitosan film by a biomimetic method”. Biomaterials (1999) 20(9): 879-884. |
Wagner A. “Mycelium Biking—Eco-Design at its Best”, Master's Thesis at Lulea University of Technology (2016) in 92 pages. |
Woller R. “The Pearl Oyster Mushroom”, University of Wisconsin Website (2011) in 2 pages. |
Wan-Mohtar et al., “The morphology of Ganoderma lucidum mycelium in a repeated-batch fermentation for exopolysaccharide production”, Biotechnology Reports (2016) 11:2-11. |
Weaver et al., “The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer”. Science (2012) 336(6086): 1275-1280. |
Yamasaki et al., “A hydrothermal hot-pressing method: Apparatus and Application”. J Mater Sci Lttrs. (1986) 5(3): 355-356. |
Zivanovic et al., “Changes in Mushroom Texture and Cell Wall Composition Affected by Thermal Processing”. J Food Service (2004) 69: 44-49. |
Agnese et al., “Investigating the Influence of Various Plasticizers on the Properties of Isolated Films of Polyvinyl Acetat”. The 37th Annual meeting and Exposition of the Controlled Release Society, Jul. 2010, Portland, OR U.S.A. |
Amsellem et al., “Long-term preservation of viable mycelia of two mycoherbicidal organisms”. Crop Protection (1999) 18: 643-649. |
Angelini et al., “Effect of antimicrobial activity of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil on antagonistic potential of Pleurotus species against Trichoderma harzianum in dual culture.” World J Microbiol Biotech. (2008) 24(2): 197-202. |
Antón et al., “PimM, a PAS Domain Positive Regulator of Pimaricin Biosynthesis in Streptomyces natalensis.” Microbiol. (2007) 153: 3174-3183. |
Arshad et al., “Tissue engineering approaches to develop cultured meat from cells: a mini review.” Cogent Food & Agriculture (2017) 3(1): 1320814 in 11 pages. |
Ashiuchi et al., “Isolation of Bacillus subtilis (chungkookjang), a poly-gamma-glutamate producer with high genetic competence”. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2011) 57: 764-769. |
Bajaj et al., “Poly (glutamic acid)—An emerging biopolymer of commercial interest”. Bioresource Tech. (2011) 102(10): 5551-5561. |
Baysal et al., “Cultivation of oyster mushroom on waste paper with some added supplementary materials”. Biosource Technology (2003) 89: 95-97. |
Begum et al., “Bioconversion and saccharification of some lignocellulosic wastes by Aspergillus oryzae ITCC-4857.01 for fermentable sugar production”. Elect J Biotech. (2011) (14)5: 3 in 8 pages. |
Belardinelli et al., “Actions of Adenosine and Isoproterenol on Isolated Mammalian Ventricular Myocytes.” Circulation Res. (1983) 53(3): 287-297. |
Belay et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Graphene-agar and Graphene Oxide-agar Composites.” JOAPS (2017) 134(33): 45085. |
Binder et al., “Phylogenetic and phylogenomic overview of the Polyporales”. Mycologia (Nov.-Dec. 2013) 105(6): 1350-1373. |
Blanchette et al., “Fungal mycelial mats used as textile by indigenous people of North America”, Mycologia (Feb. 20, 2021) pp. 1-7. |
Booth et al., “Potential of a dried mycelium formulation of an indigenous strain of Metarhizium anisopliae against subterranean pests of cranberry.” Biocontrol Science and Technology (2000) 10: 659-668. |
Bormann et al., “Characterization of a Novel, Antifungal, Chitin-binding Protein from Streptomyces tendae Tü901 that Interferes with Growth Polarity.” J Bacter. (1999) 181(24): 7421-7429. |
Bowman et al., “The structure and synthesis of the fungal cell wall”. Bioassays (2006) 28(8): 799-808. |
Bru{hacek over (z)}auskaite et al., “Scaffolds and Cells for Tissue Regernation: Different Scaffold Pore Sizes—Different Cell Effects.” Cytotechnology (2016) 68(3): 355-369. |
Cerimi et al., “Fungi as source for new bio-based materials: a patent review”, Fungal Biol Biotechnol. (2019) 6: 17; 10 pgs. |
Chai et al., “β-Glucan Synthase Gene Overexpression and β-Glucans Overproduction in Pleurotus ostreatus Using Promoter Swapping”. PLoS ONE (2013) 8(4): e61693 in 7 pages. |
Chaudhary et al., “Understanding rice hull ash as fillers in polymers: a review”. Silicon Chemistry (2002) 1:281-289. |
Chi et al., “Can Co-culturing of Two White-rot Fungi Increase Lignin Degradation and the Production of Lignin-degrading Enzymes?” Inter'l Biodeter Biodegrad. (2007) 59(1): 32-39. |
Collins English Dictionary, “Mould”, retrieved from http://collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/mould, archived on Apr. 8, 2015, 3 pages. |
Dias et al., “Synthesis and characterization of chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol-bioactive glass hybrid membranes”. Biomatter (2011) 1(1): 114-119. |
Elleuche et al., “Carbonic anhydrases in fungi”. Microbiology (2010) 156: 23-29. |
Elsacker et al., “Growing living and multifunctional mycelium composites for large-scale formwork applications using robotic abrasive wire-cutting”, Construction Bldg Mater. (2021) 283: 122732 in 16 pages. |
Fleet G.H., “Cell walls”. in The Yeasts, by Rose et al. [Eds.] 2nd Edition. vol. 4. London: Academic Press. (1991) pp. 199-277. |
Frandsen R.J.N., “A guide to binary vectors and strategies for targeted genome modification in fungi using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation”. J Microbiol Methods (2011) 87: 247-262. |
Gardening KnowHow, Perlite Soil Info: Learn About Perlite Potting Soil, online at www.gardeningknowhow.com/garden-how-to/soil-fertilizers/perlite-potting-soil.htm downloaded on Dec. 16, 2015., 3 pages. |
Glowacki et al., “Bioconjugation of Hydrogen-bonded Organic Semiconductors with Functional Proteins.” J Mate Chem. C (2015) 3(25): 6554-6564. |
Goodell et al., “Fungal Decay of Wood: Soft Rot-Brown Rot-white Rot”. In Development of Commercial Wood Preservatives; Schultz et al. [Ed.] ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (2008), Chapter 2, pp. 9-31. |
Google Report, Complete colonization substrate mushroom (2 pages) Jan. 30, 2018., 2 pages. |
Google Dictionary Definition “Composite”, downloaded on Nov. 21, 2018; 1 page. |
Gourmet Mushroom, Inc., “What is Mushroom?” —Mushroom Facts Mushroom Information—Educational & Science Projects (2004). Downloaded from www.gmushrooms.com, on Nov. 27, 2017; 5 pages. |
Greetham et al., “Pheotypic characterisation of Saccharomyces sensu stricto to Inhibitory Compounds Released During the Deconstruction of Lignocellulosic Material.” 3th International Congress on Yeasts, ICY 2012, Aug. 26-30, Madison, USA; 1 page. |
Growers Supply. “Horticultural Coarse Perlite—4 Cubic Fee—Growers Supply”. URL: https://growerssupply.com; Growers Supply 2012; www.growerssupply.com/farm/supplies/prod1 :gs_growing_mediums:pg111049.html; downloaded Dec. 14, 2020 in 3 pages. |
Heinzkill et al., “Characterization of laccases and peroxidases from wood-rotting fungi (family Coprinaceae).” Appl Environ Microbiol. (1998) 64: 1601-1606. |
Home Depot “Miracle Gro® Perlite Mix”, retrieved from the internet: http://homedepot.com/p/Miracle-Gro-8-pt-Perlite-Mix-74278430/204502291; 2 pages. |
Home Depot “Pennington—Fast Acting Gypsum”, retrieved from the internet: http://homedepot.com/p/Miracle-Gro-8-pt-Perlite-Mix-74278430/204502291; 2 pages. |
Horton et al., “Regulation of Dikaryon-Expressed Genes by FRT1 in the Basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune”. Fungal Genet Biol. (1999) 26(1): 33-47. |
Hüttner et al., “Recent advances in the intellectual property landscape of filamentous fungi”, Fungal Biol Biotechnol. (2020) 7:16; 17 pgs. |
Hyde et al., “The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially”. Fungal Diversity (2019) 97(1): 1-136. |
Kamzolkina et al., “Micromorphological features of Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quel, and P. ostreaturs (Jacq.) P. Kumm. Strains in pure and binary culture with yeasts”. Tsitologiia (2006) 48(2): 153-160. |
Kemppainen et al., “Transformation of the Mycorrhizal Fungus Laccaria Bicolor using Agrobacterium tumefaciens.” Bioengin Bugs (2011) 2(1): 38-44. |
Kerem et al., “Effect of Mananese on Lignin Degradation by Pleurotus ostreatus during Solid-State Fermentation”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology (1993) 59(12): 4115-4120. |
Kilaru et al., “Investigating dominant selection markers for Coprinopsis cinerea: a carboxin resistance system and re-evaluation of hygromycin and phleomycin resistance vectors”. Curr Genet. (2009) 55: 543-550. |
Kim et al., “Current Technologies and Related Issues for Mushroom Transformation.” Mycobiology (2015) 43(1): 1-8. |
Kotlarewski et al., “Mechanical Properties of Papua New Guinea Balsa Wood.” European J Wood Wood Products (2016) 74(1): 83-89. |
Kück et al., “New tools for the genetic manipulation of filamentous fungi”. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2010) 86: 51-62. |
Kües, U., “Life History and Development Processes in the Basidiomycete Coprinus Cinereus.” Micro Molecular Biol Rev. (2000) 64(2): 316-353. |
Kuhar et al., by Ingredi Potassium Sorbate vs Campden Tablets in Wine Making; Jun. 4, 2018. [online]; Retrieved from the Internet <URL: https://ingredi.com/blog/potassium-sorbate-vs-campden-tables-in-wine-making/>; 2 pages. |
Kuo, 2005-2006. Glossary of Mycological Terms. Mushroom Expert. Com., pp. 1-13; downloaded from http://www.mushroomexpert.com/glossary.html (May 8, 2015). |
Li et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Homogeneous Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan Composite Scaffolds via In-Situ Hydration”. J Biomaterials Nanobiotech. (2010) 1: 42-49. |
Luo et al., “Coprinus comatus: a basidiomycete fungus forms novel spiny structures and infects nematode.” Mycologia (2004) 96(6): 1218-1225. |
McPherson et al., “Dissolvable Antibiotic Beads in Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision Arthroplasty: The Use of Synthetic Pure Calcium Sulfate (Stimulan®) Impregnated with Vancomycin & Tobramycin.” Reconstructive Review (2013) 3(1) 12 pages. |
Merriam-Webster, “Chamber” dictionary definition; https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary accessed Jul. 10, 2017; in 4 Pages. |
Merriam-Webster, “pack” Thesaurus definition; https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus; synonyms accessed Aug. 19, 2019; in 10 Pages. |
Michielse et al., “Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation of the Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus Awamori.” Nature Protocols (2008) 3(10): 1671-1678. |
Mitchell et al., [Eds.] “Solid-State Fermentation Bioreactors.” Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (2006); TOC in 12 Pages. |
Moore D., “Fungal Morphogenesis.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; (1998) TOC in 8 Pages. |
Moore D., “Tolerance of Imprecision in Fungal Morphogenesis.” In Proceedings of the 4th Meeting on the Genetics and Cellular Biology of Basidiomycetes (Mar. 1998) pp. 13-19. |
Mushroom Growers' Handbook 1, “Oyster Mushroom Cultivation”. Part II, Chapter 5, (2005) pp. 75-85. |
Mushroom Growers' Handbook 2, “Shiitake Bag Cultivation”, Part I Shiitake. Published by Mush World (2005) Chapter 4, pp. 73-90 and pp. 105-109. |
Naknean et al., “Factors Affecting Retention and Release of Flavor Compounds in Food Carbohydrates.” Inter'l Food Res J. (2010) 17(1): 23-34. |
Newaz et al., “Characterization of Balsa Wood Mechanical Properties Required for Continuum Damage Mechanics Analysis.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications (2016) 230(1): 206-218. |
Norvell L., Fungi Biology. Encyclopedia.(2002); 2 pages. |
Novoselova et al., “Cocultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm, with yeasts”. Moscow University Biol Sciences Bulletin (2011) 66(3): 102-105. |
Nussinovitch “Polymer Macro-and Micro-Gel Beads: Fundamentals and Applications”, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6618_2, Springer Science & Business Media LLC (2010) TOC in 8 Pages. |
Paz et al., “One Step Contruction of Agrobacterium-Recombination-ready-plasmids (OSCAR): An Efficient and Robust Tool for ATMT Based Gene Deletion Construction in Fungi.” Fungal Gen Biol. (2011) 48(7): 677-684. |
Peksen et al., “Favourable Culture Conditions for mycelial growth of Hydnum repandum, a medicinal mushroom.” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines (2013) 10(6): 431-434. |
Peng et al., “Microbial biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons”. FEMS Microbiol Rev. (2008) 32:927-955. |
Perez et al., “Myxococcus xanthus induces actinorhodin overproduction and aerial mycelium formation by Streptomyces coelicolor.” Microbial Biotech. (2011) 4(2): 175-183. |
Philippoussis et al., “Production of Mushrooms Using Agro-Industrial Residues as Substrates”, in Biotechnology for Agro-Industrial Residues, Chapter 9, (2009) pp. 163-187. |
Poppe J., Mushroom Growers' Handbook 1, 2004, Part II. Chapter 5, “Substrate”, pp. 80-81. |
Pompei et al., “The Use of Olive Milling Waste-Water for the Culture of Mushrooms on Perlite”. Acta Horticulturae (1994) 361:179-185. |
Rai et al., “Production of Edible Fungi”, in Fungal Biotechnology in Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Applications, D.K. Arora [Ed.], Marcel Dekker, Inc., (2003), Chapter 21, pp. 383-404. |
Ross, P., “Pure Culture” 1997-Present; URL: <http://billhoss.phpwebhosting.com/ross/index.php?kind>; downloaded Dec. 14, 2016 in 11 pages. |
Royse et al., “Influence of substrate wood-chip particle size on shiitake (Lentinula edodes) yield”. Bioresource Tehnology (2001) 76(3): 229-233. |
Sapak et al., “Effect of endophytic bacteria on growth and suppression of Tganoderma infection in oil palm”. Int J Agric Biol. (2008) 10(2): 127-132. |
Schaner et al., “Decellularized Vein as a Potential Scaffold for Vascular Tissue Engineering.” J Vascular Surg. (2004) 40(1): 146-153. |
Schirp et al., “Production and characterization of natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites using wheat straw modified with the fungus Pleurotus ostreatus”. J Appl. Polym Sci. (2006) 102:5191-5201. |
Scholtmeijer et al., “Effect of introns and AT-rich sequences on expression of the bacterial hygromycin B resistance gene in the basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune”. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2001) 67(1): 481-483. |
Schuurman J., “Unique agar Pearls.” YouTube video; Feb. 16, 2012, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GqTTOHETPQ>; 1 page. |
Science Daily, May 7, 2007, retrieved from the Internet; http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070506085628.htm., 3 pages. |
Seamon K.B., “Forskolin: Unique Diterpene Activator of Adenylate Cyclase in Membranes and in Intact Cells.” PNAS (1981) 78(6): 3363-3367. |
Sinotech et al., (2015): retrieved from the Internet http://www.sinotech.com/compressionAndTransferMolding.html., 4 pages. |
Slater, M. “Young SoRo Entrepreneur Develops Environmentally Friendly Insulation.” The Herald of Randolph. Jun. 21, 2007, pp. 1-2. |
Staib et al., “Differential expression of the NRG1 repressor controls species-specific regulation of chlamydospore development in Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis.” Molecular Microbiol. (2005) 55(2): 637-652. |
Stamets P., “Mycelium Running”. Ten Speed Press (2005); pp. 18, 56, 58, 59, 85, 149, 157, 160 and 291 only. |
Stanev et al., “Open Cell Metallic Porous Materials Obtained Through Space Holders. Part I: Production Methods, A Review”. JMSE (2016) 139(5): 21 pages. |
Stephens et al., “Bringing Cultured Meat to Market: Technical, Socio-political, and Regulatory Challenges in Cellular Agriculture.” Trends in Food Science & Technology (2018) 78:155-166. |
Sundari et al., “Freeze-drying vegetative mycelium of Laccaria fraterna and its subsequent regeneration”. Biotechnology Techniques (1999) 13: 491-495. |
Tartar et al., “Differential expression of chitin synthase (CHS) and glucan synthase (FKS) genes correlates with the formation of a modified, thinner cell wall in in vivo-produced Beauveria bassiana cells.” Mycopathologia (2005) 160(4): 303-314. |
Téllez-Jurado et al., “Expression of a heterologous laccase by Aspergillus niger cultured by solid-state and submerged fermentations.” Enzyme Microbial Tech. (2006) 38(5): 665-669. |
Téllez-Téllez et al., “Growth and laccase production by Pleurotus ostreatus in submerged and solid-state fermentation.” Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2008) 81(4): 675-679. |
Thomas et al., “Growing Orchids in Perlite”. In Perlite Plant Guide, The Schundler Company 1951, pp. 1-6, downloaded from http://www.schundler.com/index.html, archived on May 11, 2015. |
Timberpress—“How Do Mushrooms Grow So Quickly.”, downloaded from the internet: www.timberpress.com/blog/2017/01/how-do-mushrooms-grow-so-quickly, download Feb. 27, 2018 in 7 Pages. |
Ugalde U., “Autoregulatory Signals in Mycelial Fungi” in The Mycota: A Comprehensive Treatise on Fungi as Experimental Systems for Basic and Applied Research. K. Esser [Ed.] Springer Publisher, 2nd Edition (2006) Chapter 11; pp. 203-213. |
Universal Oil Field, “Sawdust”, downloaded from universaloilfield.org on Aug. 23, 2018, 4 pages. |
Vara et al., “Cloning and expression of a puromycin N-acetyl transferase gene from Streptomyces alboniger in Streptomyces lividans and Escherichia coli”. Gene (1985) 33(22): 197-206. |
Visser et al., “Pseudoxylaria as stowaway of the fungus-growing termite nest: Interaction asymmetry between Pseudoxylaria, Termitomyces and free-living relatives”. Fungal Ecology (2011) 4(5): 322-332. |
Volk (2003) “Tom Volk's Fungus of the Month for Oct. 1998”. This month's fungus is Pleurotus ostreatus; the Oyster mushroom, pp. 1-4, downloaded from http://botit.botany.wise.edu/toms_fungi/oct98.html on May 8, 2015. |
Wang et al., “Influence of fungal elicitors on biosynthesis of natamycin by Streptomyces natalensis HW-2”. Appl Microbiol Biothechnol. (2003) 97: 5527-5534. |
Wikipedia, “Water gel (plain)”, Wikipedia Contributors downloaded Aug. 21, 2017 in 1 Page. |
Wikipedia, “Wood”, downloaded on Nov. 26, 2018, 1 page. |
Xiao et al., “A Water-soluble Core Material for Manufacturing Hollow Composite Sections.” Comp. Structures (2017) 182: 380-390. |
Yang et al., “Medicinal Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum as a Potent Elicitor in Production of t-Resveratrol and t-Peceatannol in Peanut Calluses”. J Agric Food Chem. (2010) 58(17): 9518-9522. |
Zimin et al., “The MaSuRCA genome assembler”. Bioinformatics (2013) 29(21): 2669-2677. |
Grant, James. J.—“An investigation of the airflow in mushroom growing structures, the development of an improved, three-dimensional solution technique for fluid flow and its evaluation for the modelling of mushroom growing structures”, Doctoral Thesis Sep. 2002; 326 pages. |
Antinori et al., “Advanced mycelium materials as potential self-growing biomedical scaffolds.” Scientific reports (2021) 11(1): 1-14. |
Hidayat et al., “Characterization of polylactic acid (PLA)/kenaf composite degradation by immobilized mycelia of Pleurotus ostreatus”. Inter Biodeter Biodegrad. (2012) 71: 50-54. |
Jiang et al., “Bioresin Infused then Cured Mycelium-based Sandwich-structure Biocomposites: Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) Process, Flexural Properties, and Simulation.” J Cleaner Production (2019) 207:123-135. |
Jones et al., Chitin-chitosan Thin Films from Microbiologically Upcycled Agricultural By-products. In 13th International Conference on the Mechanical Behavious of Materials, Melbourne, Australia (Jun. 2019) p. 66; in 7 pages. |
Williams, J. “Growth Industry”, Financial Times Jan. 12, 2019 (Mogu—Radical by Nature); download from URL <: https://mogu.bio/growth-industry-financial-times-uk-article/> in 1 page. |
Wösten et al., “Growing Fungi Structures in Space”, ACT Research Category/Space Architecture; Noordwijk, The Netherlands (Oct. 15, 2018) in 17 pages. |
Meyer et al., “Comparison of the Technical Performance of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives.” Coatings (Feb. 2021) 11(2): 226; 14 pages. |
Abbadi et al., “Immunocytochemical identification and localization of lipase in cells of the mycelium of Penicillium cyclopium variety”, Applied Microbial Cell Physiology (1995) 42: 923-930. |
Ando et al., “Cosmetic material for skin whitening - contains mushroom mycelium cultured matter and e.g. ginseng extract, chondroitin sodium sulphate and/or hyaluronic acid”, WPI/Thomson (Jan. 14, 1992), 1992(8): Accession #1992-062018; Abstract of JP4009316A; in 9 pages. |
Attias et al.., “Biofabrication of Nanocellulose-Mycelium Hybrid Materials”, Adv Sustainable Syst. (2020) 5(2): 2000196 in 12 pages; Supporting Information in 7 pages. |
Borrás et al., “Trametes versicolor pellets production: Low-cost medium and scale-up”, Biochem Eng J. (2008) 42(1): 61-66. |
Green et al., “Mechanical Properties of Wood”, Forest Products Laboratory, 1999. in Wood Handbook—Wood as an engineering material. Gen Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113, Chapter 4 in 46 pages. |
Holt et al. “Fungal mycelium and cotton plant materials in the manufacture of biodegradable molded packaging material: Evaluation study of select blends of cotton byproducts.” J Biobased Mater Bioenergy (2012) 6(4): 431-439. |
Jiang et al., “Manufacturing of Natural Composites with a Mycelium Binder and Vacuum-infused Vegetable Oil-based Resins”, Poster dated May 2014; 1 page. |
Jiang et al., “Vacuum Infusion of Mycelium-Bound Biocomposite Preforms with Natural Resins”, CAMX ExpoConference Proceedings, Oct. 13-16, 2014, 13 pages. |
Jones et al., “Mycelim Composites: A Review of Engineering Characteristics and Growth Kinetics”, J Bionanoscience (2017) 11 (4): 241-257. |
Jones et al., “Waste-derived Low-cost Mycelium Composite Construction Materials with Improved Fire Safety”, FAM (Fire and Materials) (2018) 42(7): 816-825. |
Kuhn et al., [Eds.] Cell Walls and Membranes in Fungi—An Introduction (Abstract) in Biochemistry of Cell Walls and Membranes in Fungi, Chapter 1, Springer Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 1990, 2 pages. |
Pathway-27, “Beta-glucan”, Aug. 2012, retrieved from http://http://www.pathway27.eu/topstory/beta-glucan/on Oct. 7, 2021 in 2 pages. |
Stamets P., “Growing Gourmet and Medicinal Mushrooms”, (1993) Chapter 21; p. 363. (Best Available Copy). |
Vetchinkina et al., “Bioreduction of Gold (III) Ions from Hydrogen Tetrachloaurate...” Scientific Practical J Health Life Sciences No. 4, ISSN 22188-2268, (2013) pp. 51-56. |
Wosten et al., “How a fungus escapes the water to grow into the air”, Current Biology. (1999) 9(2): 85-88. |
Zeng Z., “Cosmetic composition for cleaning skin, comprises glossy ganoderma spores and collagens, content of glossy ganoderma spores in composition and content of collagens in composition”, WPI/Thomson (Feb. 5, 2006) 7: Accession #2007-057767; Abstract of CN1732887A; in 11 pages. |
Ziegler et al., “Evaluation of Physico-mechanical Properties of Mycelium Reinforced Green Biocomposites Made from Cellulosic Fibers”, Appl Engin Agricult. (2016) 32(6): 931-938. |
Collins English Dictionary, “Cavity”, Definition; retrieved on Nov. 8, 2021; 1 page. |
Merriam-Webster, “desiccated” (Adj.) Definition; downloaded on Nov. 8, 2021; 1 page. |
Wang et al., “Chemical and structural factors influencing enzymatic saccharification of wood from aspen, birch and spruce”. Biomass Bioengin. (2018) 109: 125-134. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200146224 A1 | May 2020 | US | |
20210127601 A9 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62707704 | Nov 2017 | US |