1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to communication networks and more particularly to systems and methods for increased data throughput over communication networks, such as wireless networks.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A reference model can conveniently represent communication between networked devices.
These reference models represent communications as processes which occur in a hierarchy of higher and lower layer protocols. In general, each layer communicates with a higher layer protocol and a lower layer protocol. As indicated by
For instance, the communication between the network devices in the transport layer (i.e., the higher layer protocol) is embedded into a communication in the internet layer (i.e., the lower layer protocol for the transport layer protocol) of each device. Physical data transfer is ultimately made at the lowest layer protocol in the hierarchy of the reference model. In the DoD network reference model, the lowest layer protocol is the network access layer.
The network access layer comprises media access control services and protocols (which attach physical source and destination addresses, e.g., Ethernet addresses, and control protocols), and the physical medium, for example, copper cables or RF specifications such as the type of modulation. To achieve compatibility and interoperability of equipment manufactured by various different vendors, communication networks often rely on standard specifications for the network access layer. In one example, in 1997, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802 Group established the 802.11 wireless standard specifying media access (MAC) services, protocols, and an RF physical layer for wireless communication. This protocol is now in widespread use for wireless networks. For example, in an IEEE 802.11 network, an access point (e.g., a base station) communicates data with a remote receiving node (e.g., a mobile station such as a laptop computer configured with a network interface card) over a wireless link such as a radio frequency (RF) baseband wireless link.
Generally, wireless transmissions tend to be more susceptible to data losses than other forms of data transmission. Wireless transmission can be unreliable because of problems such as interference, signal attenuation, and multi-path reflections of radio signals. For example, 802.11b and 802.11g wireless local area networks (LANs) communicate by way of a 2.45 GHz frequency band which often has interfering radiation from mobile phones, microwave ovens and other 802.11 networks. To address this problem, the 802.11 specification comprises mechanisms to enable reliable communication despite the presence of interference.
In the present context, a transmission protocol is “reliable” if the protocol provides for verification that the receiving node received the data. One mechanism by which an 802.11 wireless access point provides reliable communication with an associated receiving node is with 802.11 acknowledgments (ACKs). A unicast 802.11 packet is acknowledged by the receiving node via an 802.11 ACK following a successful reception. If the access point does not detect the 802.11 ACK within a set period of time, the unicast 802.11 packet is presumed to have been lost and is therefore retransmitted by the access point. However, by implementing a reliable lower layer protocol, the transmission of 802.11 ACKs limits data transmission rates over communication networks because for successfully received unicast 802.11 packets, the 802.11 ACKs are transmitted in return.
A higher layer protocol that implements reliable transmission potentially further limits the data transmission rates when implemented on a communication network that provides a reliable lower layer protocol, such as the wireless network. For example, the transport layer of the DoD reference module typically includes reliable connection oriented protocols, such as TCP, for the exchange of data between a sender and a receiver. TCP assures reliable delivery of data services between the sender and the receiver (i.e., the source and destination) using several mechanisms. After a predefined amount of data is transmitted from the sender to the receiver, the sender must wait for a TCP acknowledgment (ACK) in the transport layer back from the receiver to confirm that the data was received. The sender is not allowed to transmit additional data until it receives this ACK, and if the sender does not receive the ACK within a predetermined time, it must retransmit the data.
The receiving node 330 then transmits a TCP ACK 370 to the source 310 through the access point 320. The access point 320 acknowledges receipt of the TCP ACK 370 by another 802.11 ACK 380. The access point 320 finally transmits the TCP ACK 370 to the source 310.
Therefore, the TCP ACKs (e.g., the TCP ACK 370) are particularly burdensome in the 802.11 wireless LAN because multiple acknowledgments, (i.e., TCP ACKs and 802.11 ACKs) are sent to acknowledge receipt of the same communication (i.e., the TCP data 350). A wireless network, such as an IEEE 802.11 network, may provide a relatively high maximum physical data rate, for example 54 Mbps. However, because TCP packet headers and other protocol content is transmitted over the wireless link along with application layer data, in practice, the TCP data transfer rate corresponding to a 54 Mbps rate of physical transmission between physical IEEE 802.11g network devices is only about 24 Mbps. Hence, protocol overhead comprises about 50% of the application layer data rate.
Additionally, data transmission between a TCP source and a TCP destination is often unidirectional. For example, applications such as web browsers commonly receive large amounts of data from a remote website while sending little or no data back to the site. Accordingly, the TCP data transmission is often unidirectional over short intervals, and the TCP ACKs from the receiver to the sender typically carry no TCP data.
One limitation is that the protocol overhead for sending the TCP ACKs from the receiver to the sender burdens the physical communication channel when there is no actual TCP data being transferred from the receiver to the sender. Furthermore, much of this overhead is typically repeated for each TCP ACK. As a result, much of the time used to send 802.11 data packets is taken up with sending encapsulated TCP ACKs that have no accompanying TCP data and accompanying 802.11 ACKs. The multiple TCP ACKs and 802.11 ACKs increase network traffic over the communication network and limit bandwidth for the transfer of the data.
The present invention provides systems, devices, and methods for throughput enhancement by acknowledgment suppression. A method comprises transmitting data according to a higher layer protocol from a source to a destination through an intermediate device between the source and the destination, transmitting a first acknowledgment according to a lower layer protocol from the destination to the intermediate device, and transmitting a second acknowledgment according to the higher layer protocol to the source from the intermediate device based on the first acknowledgment. The destination may comprise a node of a wireless network. The intermediate device may comprise an access point of the wireless network.
In some embodiments, the higher layer protocol comprises TCP, a reliable connection oriented protocol, and the second acknowledgment comprises a TCP ACK. The lower layer protocol may comprise an 802.11 protocol, and the first acknowledgment comprises an 802.11 ACK.
Another method comprises transmitting data according to a higher layer protocol from a source to a destination, transmitting a first acknowledgment to the source according to a lower layer protocol from an intermediate device between the source and the destination, transmitting a second acknowledgment according to the higher layer protocol from the destination to the intermediate device, and suppressing the second acknowledgment at the intermediate device. In some embodiments, the source comprises a node of a wireless network. The intermediate device may comprise an access point of a wireless network. In some embodiments, suppressing the second acknowledgment comprises not transmitting the second acknowledgment to the source.
Still another method of the invention comprises transmitting data according to a higher layer protocol from a source to a destination through an intermediate device between the source and the destination, transmitting a first acknowledgment to the source according to a lower layer protocol from the intermediate device, and transmitting a second acknowledgment according to the lower layer protocol to the intermediate device from the destination.
A wireless local area network (LAN) device, such as an access point, is further provided. The device comprises logic configured to transmit data according to a higher layer protocol from a source to a destination, receive a first acknowledgment according to a lower layer protocol from the destination, and transmit a second acknowledgment according to the higher layer protocol to the source based on the first acknowledgment. In these embodiments, the logic may be embodied in any combination of hardware, software, and firmware elements. In some embodiments, the device is further configured to broadcast a beacon advertising a capability to generate TCP acknowledgments based on 802.11 acknowledgments.
Another wireless LAN device of the invention comprises logic configured to receive data according to a higher layer protocol from a source, transmit a first acknowledgment to the source according to a lower layer protocol, and not send a higher layer protocol acknowledgment to the source in response to receiving the data. In some embodiments, the wireless LAN device comprises a receiving node. The source in communication with the wireless LAN device may comprise an access point.
The present invention will be described with reference to drawings that represent preferred embodiments of the invention. These embodiments are intended to illustrate without limiting the invention. Other embodiments will become apparent from the following drawings:
The present invention is directed to methods for improving data transmission rates in communication networks through the reduction of acknowledgment transmissions, and to systems and devices that are configured to enable the methods. Specifically in an exemplary wireless network, when a node of the wireless network is transmitting TCP data over a wireless link to a destination, TCP acknowledgments (ACKs) without data or other flag bits are not sent over the wireless link if 802.11 ACKs are sufficient to inform the node that the TCP data has been properly received by the destination. If the TCP data originates outside of the wireless network and is being sent to a destination within the wireless network, the destination suppresses the TCP ACKs and an access point of the wireless network sends the TCP ACKs to the originator. If the TCP data originates within the wireless network and is being sent out of the wireless network, the access point of the wireless network suppresses the TCP ACKs. If the TCP data is being sent between nodes in the wireless network, both the access point and the destination node suppress TCP ACKs. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present invention provide access points and wireless nodes that are configured to selectively suppress TCP ACKs when appropriate.
Typically, the wireless LAN device 400 receives data from a router (not shown) connected to the Internet, and the wireless LAN device 400 exchanges the data via the wireless link with one or more remote receiving nodes (not shown). The wireless LAN device 400 can also form a part of a wireless LAN by enabling communications among the one or more remote receiving nodes. Although the disclosure focuses on specific embodiments for the wireless LAN device 400, aspects of the invention are applicable to a wide variety of devices for exchanging information via a communication network, and are not intended to be limited to the specifically disclosed embodiments.
In one embodiment, the wireless LAN device 400 includes the antenna apparatus 410, the 802.11g RF communication apparatus 420 (e.g., a transceiver), and a processor (not shown) running software to control the communication apparatus 420 and/or the antenna apparatus 410. The communication apparatus 420 can be essentially any device for generating and/or receiving an RF signal. The communication apparatus 420 may include, for example, a radio modulator/demodulator for converting data received into the wireless LAN device 400 (e.g., from the router) into an RF signal for transmission to one or more of the remote receiving nodes. In some embodiments, the communication apparatus 420 comprises circuitry for receiving data packets of video from the router and circuitry for converting the data packets into 802.11 compliant RF signals. Additionally, the principles of the invention apply to an access point with a single antenna, or an access point with two omnidirectional “whip” antennas.
The source 510 transmits the TCP data 550 destined for the receiving node 530. To reach the receiving node 530, the source 510 transmits the TCP data 550 over the wired network 500 to the access point 520. In one example, an unreliable wired network access protocol, such as, 802.3 Ethernet, may be used to transmit the TCP data 550 via the wired network 500.
After the access point 520 converts the TCP data 550 into an 802.11 frame, the access point 520 transmits the 802.11 frame comprising the TCP data 550 to the receiving node 530. Subsequently, the receiving node 530 transmits an 802.11 ACK 560 to the access point 520. Upon receiving the 802.11 ACK 560, the access point 520 has sufficient information to determine that the receiving node 530 received the TCP data 550 without error. The access point 520 then transmits a TCP ACK 570 over the wired network 500 to the source 510.
The access point 520 advantageously provides that if the access point 520 receives the 802.11 ACK 560, then the receiving node 530 received the TCP data 550 without error. Accordingly, the access point 520 and the receiving node 530 may not exchange multiple ACKs for the TCP data 540. Thus, according to one embodiment, the receiving node 530 does not send a TCP ACK to acknowledge the TCP data 550. In some embodiments, the receiving node 530 generates the TCP ACK, but is configured to suppress the TCP ACK from the transmission at the lower layer protocol. In other embodiments, the receiving node 530 is configured to not generate the TCP ACK. Not sending the TCP ACK frees the wireless link 540 for other transmissions.
Although the explanation of the embodiment shown in
The TCP data is then sent to the source 510 over the wired network 500. The source 510 then returns a TCP ACK to the access point 520. The TCP ACK from the source 510 is then suppressed by the access point 520. Suppressing the TCP ACK at the access point 520, advantageously, prevents the transmission of the TCP ACK to the receiving node 530 and the subsequent transmission of another 802.11 ACK back to the access point 520 from the receiving node 530 in response to the received TCP ACK.
Generally, in a TCP network, a proxy that synthesizes (“spoofs”) a TCP ACK from an intended destination must take responsibility for delivering the TCP data to the intended destination. It is generally necessary for the proxy (the “spoofer”) to retain the TCP data until the TCP data has been received and acknowledged by the destination. Once the source receives an acknowledgment that the TCP data has been received by the destination, the source can delete the TCP data from its transmission buffer. Thus, when the source receives a spoofed TCP ACK from the proxy before the data is actually delivered to the destination, the source can proceed as if the data had actually been delivered. Generally, the spoofed TCP ACK allows the sender to send more data to the proxy.
In this sense, the system of
In one embodiment, the access point 520 and the receiving node 530 handshake during an initial association to enable the suppression of TCP ACKs and to enable the access point 520 to spoof the suppressed TCP ACKs to the source 510 based on 802.11 ACKs from the receiving node 530. The initial association includes an exchange of information between the access point 520 and the receiving node 530 to indicate, by way of example, that the access point 520 is capable of supporting 54 Mbps physical layer rate communications.
In another embodiment, the access point 520 broadcasts a beacon advertising its capability to generate TCP ACKs based on 802.11 ACKs. If the receiving node 530 elects to use this capability to increase the capacity for TCP data transmission over the wireless link 540, the receiving node 530 will signal this capability in an 802.11 association request sent to the access point 520. Thereafter, the receiving node 530 and the access point 520 can cooperatively suppress TCP ACKs that originate either from the transport layer in the receiving node 530 or in the source 510.
After successful completion of the 802.11 association handshake, wireless 802.11 frames comprising TCP ACKs in all TCP communications transmitted across the wireless link 540 will be suppressed by spoofing the TCP ACKs from the 802.11 ACKs as described above. A benefit of the handshaking is that the access point 520 can differentiate a receiving node (not shown) that does not support TCP ACK suppression from the receiving node 530 that does. By suppressing TCP ACKs, TCP data transmission capacity in an 802.11g network can be improved by up to 30% over that of the prior art. In some embodiments, actual data throughput is increased from 24 Mbps to 30 Mbps in the 54 Mbps 802.11g physical data rate mode.
In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to suspend TCP ACK suppression, even though the access point 520 and receiving node 530 have the suppression capability. For example, when a TCP data stream is transmitted from the receiving node 530 to the source 510 via the access point 520, the access point 520 may buffer the TCP data stream until a TCP ACK returned by the source 510 towards the receiving node 530 is received by the access point 520. In order to sustain TCP ACK suppression between the access point 520 and the receiving node 530, the access point 520 may require a very high capacity buffer to store the accumulated TCP data stream from the receiving node 530. In particular, this will be the case if the TCP data stream from the access point 520 to the source 510 is interrupted, for example, due to a network problem between the access point 520 and the source 510.
In one embodiment, to reduce the buffering required by the access point 520, the access point 520 avoids suppressing TCP ACKs even though it has the capability to do so. In other embodiments, the access point 520 suppresses TCP ACKs for only a limited number of data packets. In some embodiments, the access point 520 may reduce data transmission rates over the wireless link 540, or may stop generating 802.11 ACKs to the receiving node 530, as data buffers in the access point 520 become full.
The access point 620 may buffer TCP data between the receiving node 630 and the receiving node 640. The access point 620 may also operate as a proxy between the receiving node 630 and the receiving node 640. When the access point 620 operates solely as a buffer, the receiving node 630 transmits TCP data 670 to the access point 620. The access point 620 then returns an 802.11 ACK 680 to the receiving node 630 to acknowledge the receipt of the TCP data 670. The access point 620 then transmits the TCP data 670 to the receiving node 640. The receiving node 640 transmits an 802.11 ACK 690 to the access point 620. In this situation, as compared to the prior art, a TCP ACK and an 802.11 ACK are eliminated both between the access point 620 and the receiving node 630, and between the receiving node 640 and the access point 620.
As described herein, the access point 620 can act to prevent an overflow of the data buffers in the access point 620. The access point 620 can suspend TCP ACK suppression entirely with the receiving nodes 630 and 655. Alternatively, the access point 620 can operate as a proxy between the receiving node 630 and the receiving node 640. In this mode of operation, the access point 620 generates a TCP ACK from the receiving node 640 to the receiving node 630 based on the 802.11 ACK 690 received from the receiving node 640. The access point 620 transmits the spoofed TCP ACK to the receiving node 630. The access point 620 may further moderate data transmission rates and TCP ACK suppression based on a degree of buffer fullness.
In general, the access point 620 may not suppress TCP segments that comprise data in addition to an acknowledgment (ACK flag set). Furthermore, in some embodiments, the access point 620 may not suppress TCP segments comprising the three-part “handshake” which initiates a TCP connection (a first TCP segment with only the synchronize (SYN) flag set, followed by a second reply TCP segment with both flags SYN and ACK set, and then a third TCP ACK confirming receipt of the SYN/ACK reply). TCP segments including certain TCP control flags, for example, the urgent pointer field (URG), the synchronize no more data (SYN FIN), and the reset connection (RST) flags are not suppressed in some embodiments. However, not all TCP implementations are the same and selected segments comprising these flags or data may be suppressed in some embodiments.
Although the present invention has been described with respect to the 802.11 wireless protocols, the principles of the invention also apply to generating an acknowledgment for a reliable higher layer protocol based on any lower layer protocol that supports reliable data transmission. Additionally, although the present invention has been described with respect to the TCP protocol, the invention also applies to any higher layer protocol that supports reliable data transmission.
For example, referring to again to
The receiving node 530 does not send an ACK for the UDP packet because the UDP protocol does not provide reliable transmission through acknowledgments. However, the receiving node 530 may send a TFTP ACK according to the TFTP higher layer protocol. According to the principles of the invention, the receiving node 530 may suppress transmission of the TFTP ACK because the 802.11 ACK 560 was already sent. The access point 520 then may send a TFTP ACK (in place of the TCP ACK 570) to the source 510 to acknowledge reception of the file. Advantageously, the access point 520 may generate a higher layer protocol acknowledgment (e.g., the TFTP application layer ACK) based on the lower layer protocol acknowledgment (e.g., the 802.11 ACK 560).
In the foregoing specification, the present invention is described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, but those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited thereto. Various features and aspects of the above-described present invention may be used individually or jointly. Further, the present invention can be utilized in any number of environments and applications beyond those described herein without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the specification. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. It will be recognized that the terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” as used herein, are specifically intended to be read as open-ended terms of art.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/625,331 entitled “Systems and Methods for Improved Data Throughput in Wireless Local Area Networks,” filed on Nov. 5, 2004, the subject matter of which are hereby incorporated by reference. This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/010,076 entitled “System and Method for an Omnidirectional Planar Antenna Apparatus with Selectable Elements,” filed on Dec. 9, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/022,080 entitled “Circuit Board Having a Peripheral Antenna Apparatus with Selectable Antenna Elements,” filed on Dec. 23, 2004, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/041,145 entitled “System and Method for a Minimized Antenna Apparatus with Selectable Elements,” filed on Jan. 21, 2005, the subject matter of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1653664 | Kirkup | Dec 1927 | A |
4176356 | Foster et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4193077 | Greenberg et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4253193 | Kennard | Feb 1981 | A |
4305052 | Baril et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4513412 | Cox | Apr 1985 | A |
4814777 | Monser | Mar 1989 | A |
5097484 | Akaiwa | Mar 1992 | A |
5117430 | Berglund | May 1992 | A |
5173711 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5203010 | Felix | Apr 1993 | A |
5220340 | Shafai | Jun 1993 | A |
5220678 | Feei | Jun 1993 | A |
5361256 | Doeringer | Nov 1994 | A |
5373548 | McCarthy | Dec 1994 | A |
5408465 | Gusella et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5507035 | Bantz | Apr 1996 | A |
5559800 | Mousseau et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5570366 | Baker | Oct 1996 | A |
5608726 | Virgile | Mar 1997 | A |
5636213 | Eastmond et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5754145 | Evans | May 1998 | A |
5767809 | Chuang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5802312 | Lazaridis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5867109 | Wiedeman | Feb 1999 | A |
5930259 | Katsube | Jul 1999 | A |
5940771 | Gollnick et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960344 | Mahany | Sep 1999 | A |
5964830 | Durrett | Oct 1999 | A |
5970410 | Carney et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974034 | Chin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6018659 | Ayyagari et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034638 | Thiel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044062 | Brownrigg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088570 | Komara et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094177 | Yamamoto | Jul 2000 | A |
6132306 | Trompower | Oct 2000 | A |
6181697 | Nurenberg | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6249516 | Brownrigg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266528 | Farzaneh | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266537 | Kashitani et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292153 | Aiello et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307524 | Britain | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317599 | Rappaport et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326922 | Hegendoerfer | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337628 | Campana, Jr. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6337668 | Ito et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339404 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345043 | Hsu | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356242 | Ploussios | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356243 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356553 | Nagami et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356905 | Gershman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377227 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392610 | Braun et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393261 | Lewis | May 2002 | B1 |
6404386 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404775 | Leslie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407719 | Ohira et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414955 | Clare et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418138 | Cerf et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442507 | Skidmore et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445688 | Garces et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6493679 | Rappaport et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498589 | Horii | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499006 | Rappaport et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505253 | Chiu | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507321 | Oberschmidt et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6570883 | Wong | May 2003 | B1 |
6584080 | Ganz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6625454 | Rappaport et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6674459 | Ben-Shachar et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6701522 | Rubin et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704301 | Chari et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714551 | Le-Ngoc | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725281 | Zintel et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728514 | Bandeira et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6753814 | Killen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762723 | Nallo et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6778517 | Lou et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779004 | Zintel | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6819287 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6836481 | Hotta | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6873627 | Miller | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876280 | Nakano | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888504 | Chiang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6888893 | Li et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6892230 | Gu et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6906678 | Chen | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910068 | Zintel et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6924768 | Wu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931429 | Gouge et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941143 | Mathur | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950019 | Bellone et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957042 | Williams | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957277 | Yagyu et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961028 | Joy et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973622 | Rappaport et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6975834 | Forster | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6996086 | Wolfe et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7034770 | Yang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043277 | Pfister | May 2006 | B1 |
7050809 | Lim | May 2006 | B2 |
7053853 | Merenda et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064717 | Kaluzni et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076274 | Jollota et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085814 | Gandhi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7089307 | Zintel et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113519 | Hammel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7130895 | Zintel et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136655 | Skafidas et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149197 | Garahi et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157757 | Parekh et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161934 | Buchsbaum | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164667 | Rayment et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171223 | Herscovich et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171475 | Weisman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187925 | Abhishek | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203508 | Ohkubo et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7269174 | Olson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283494 | Hammel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289505 | Sanchez | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292617 | Beasley et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7321571 | Schnack et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336642 | Rich et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7355997 | Qian | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362737 | Behroozi | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369510 | Wong | May 2008 | B1 |
7489932 | Chari et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496680 | Canright | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505426 | Srikrishna et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505447 | Kish et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515589 | Bacher et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522731 | Kiemba et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7546126 | Beasley et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551562 | Srikrishna et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7586879 | Chari et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7672274 | Bims | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697504 | Chari et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715395 | Ginchereau et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7733833 | Kalika et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7787436 | Kish et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7853829 | Younger et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7916684 | Henderson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7974223 | Zelig et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8089869 | Kisela et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8089949 | Kish | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8125975 | Kish et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8355343 | Kish et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8547899 | Kish | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8619662 | Kish | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8634402 | Kish | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638708 | Kish | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8688834 | Fujimoto et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8780760 | Kish | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8824357 | Kish et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9019886 | Kish | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9066152 | Kish | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9071942 | Kish | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20010047474 | Takagi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010055312 | Negus | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001310 | Mai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031130 | Tsuchiya et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020036996 | Ozluturk et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045435 | Fantaske | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047800 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020080767 | Lee | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084942 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105471 | Kojima et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112058 | Weisman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114330 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143951 | Khan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158798 | Chiang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158801 | Crilly, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164963 | Tehrani et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170064 | Monroe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194367 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003917 | Copley et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026240 | Eyuboglu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030026268 | Nava | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030588 | Kalis et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043786 | Kall | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063591 | Leung et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030122714 | Wannagot et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133458 | Sato et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169330 | Ben-Shachar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184490 | Raiman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189514 | Miyano et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189521 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189523 | Ojantakanen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210207 | Suh et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227414 | Saliga et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228857 | Maeki | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231593 | Bauman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008663 | Srikrishna | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014432 | Boyle | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017310 | Runkle et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017860 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027291 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027304 | Chiang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028006 | Kayama | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040032378 | Volman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036651 | Toda | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036654 | Hsieh | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041732 | Aikawa et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048593 | Sano | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058690 | Ratzel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061653 | Webb et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070543 | Masaki | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080455 | Lee | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085993 | Wentink | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095278 | Kanemoto et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114535 | Hoffmann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125777 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040190477 | Olson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040260800 | Gu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264463 | Fukushima | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002395 | Kondo | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009523 | Pekonen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022210 | Zintel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032531 | Gong et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041739 | Li et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042988 | Hoek et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050074018 | Zintel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050074019 | Handforth et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097503 | Zintel et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050135480 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138137 | Encarnacion et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138193 | Encarnacion et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153720 | White et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180381 | Retzer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185666 | Raya et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188193 | Kuehnel et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050226239 | Nishida et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232179 | Da Costa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240665 | Gu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250544 | Grant et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267935 | Gandhi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271070 | Mikami et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060018335 | Koch | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060045089 | Bacher et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060094371 | Nguyen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098605 | Li | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098607 | Zeng et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098613 | Kish et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114881 | Chari | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123124 | Weisman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123125 | Weisman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123455 | Pai et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133341 | Chari et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165029 | Melpignano et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168159 | Weisman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184660 | Rao et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184661 | Weisman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184693 | Rao et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224690 | Falkenburg et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060225107 | Seetharaman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227761 | Scott, III et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239369 | Lee | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060268881 | Moreton | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280131 | Rahman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291434 | Gu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002750 | Sang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010271 | Roy | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027622 | Cleron et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030811 | Frei et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070072612 | Haraguchi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070101020 | Lin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109961 | Liang | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135167 | Liu | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070189283 | Agarwal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070223451 | Ren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242602 | Pang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070280168 | Shibata | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080043638 | Ribiere | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069068 | Dean et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080137681 | Kish et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137682 | Kish et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159207 | Levine et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080225804 | Thubert | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247317 | Weil et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247327 | Weil et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267116 | Kang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090019314 | Younger et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028095 | Kish et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040989 | Da Costa et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067369 | Stamoulis | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090073921 | Ji et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080333 | Ozer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090154359 | Strutt et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180396 | Kish et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090207730 | Stamoulis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213730 | Zeng et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225676 | Kisela et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090262677 | Banerjea et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100040056 | Kobayashi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100085916 | Yu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100182944 | Kish et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110096712 | Kish et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119360 | Kish | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119401 | Kish | May 2011 | A1 |
20110158233 | Namgung | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110216685 | Kish et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120063379 | Kish et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130010775 | Kish et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130194969 | Kish et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140016563 | Kish | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140071879 | Kish | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140133385 | Kish | May 2014 | A1 |
20140175117 | Kish | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150312727 | Kish | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 965 598 | May 2007 | CN |
102763378 | Oct 2012 | CN |
0352787 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0 534 612 | Mar 1993 | EP |
1 315 311 | May 2003 | EP |
1 450 521 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 608 108 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1 653 664 | May 2006 | EP |
2 350 863 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2306278 | Apr 1997 | GB |
3038933 | Jul 1989 | JP |
2008088633 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2001057560 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2005354249 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006060408 | Mar 2006 | JP |
31159 | Oct 2012 | VN |
WO 0225967 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO0249360 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03079484 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004057817 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2005008938 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2006052639 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2007016326 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2009088488 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2011060454 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2012061531 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ken Tang, et al., “MAC Layer Broadcast Support in 802.11 Wireless Networks,” Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000 IEEE, pp. 544-548. |
Ken Tang, et al., “MAC Reliable Broadcast in Ad Hoc Networks,” Computer Science. Department, University of California, Los Angeles, 2001 IEEE, pp. 1008-1013. |
Vincent D. Park, et al., “A Performance Comparison of the Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm and Ideal Link-State Routing,” IEEE, Jul. 1998, pp. 592-598. |
Ian F. Akyildiz, et al., “A Virtual Topology Based Routing Protocol for Multihop Dynamic Wireless Networks,” Broadband and Wireless Networking Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology. |
Dell Inc., “How Much Broadcast and Multicast Traffic Should I Allow in My Network,” PowerConnect Application Note #5, Nov. 2003. |
Toskala, Antti, “Enhancement of Broadcast and Introduction of Multicast Capabilities in RAN,” Nokia Networks, Palm Springs, California, Mar. 13-16, 2001. |
Microsoft Corporation, “IEEE 802.11 Networks and Windows XP,” Windows Hardware Developer Central, Dec. 4, 2001. |
Festag, Andreas, “What is MOMBASA?” Telecommunication Networks Group (TKN), Technical University of Berlin, Mar. 7, 2002. |
Hewlett Packard, “HP ProCurve Networking: Enterprise Wireless LAN Networking and Mobility Solutions,” 2003. |
Dutta, Ashutosh et al., “MarconiNet Supporting Streaming Media Over Localized Wireless Multicast,” Proc. of the 2d Int'l Workshop on Mobile Commerce, 2002. |
Dunkels, Adam et al., “Making TCP/IP Viable for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proc. of the 1st Euro. Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks, Berlin, Jan. 2004. |
Dunkels, Adam et al., “Connecting Wireless Sensornets with TCP/IP Networks,” Proc. of the 2d Int'l Conf. on Wired Networks, Frankfurt, Feb. 2004. |
Cisco Systems, “Cisco Aironet Access Point Software Configuration Guide: Configuring Filters and Quality of Service,” Aug. 2003. |
Hirayama, Koji et al., “Next-Generation Mobile-Access IP Network,”Hitachi Review vol. 49, No. 4, 2000. |
Pat Calhoun et al., “802.11r strengthens wireless voice,” Technology Update, Network World, Aug. 22, 2005, http://www.networkworld.com/news/tech/2005/082208techupdate.html. |
Areg Alimian et al., “Analysis of Roaming Techniques,” doc.:IEEE 802.11-04/0377r1, Submission, Mar. 2004. |
Information Society Technologies Ultrawaves, “System Concept / Architecture Design and Communication Stack Requirement Document,” Feb. 23, 2004. |
Golmie, Nada, “Coexistence in Wireless Networks: Challenges and System-Level Solutions in the Unlicensed Bands,” Cambridge University Press, 2006. |
Mawa, Rakesh, “Power Control in 3G Systems,” Hughes Systique Corporation, Jun. 28, 2006. |
Wennstrom, Mattias et al., “Transmit Antenna Diversity in Ricean Fading MIMO Channels with Co-Channel Interference,” 2001. |
Steger, Christopher et al., “Performance of IEEE 802.11b Wireless LAN in an Emulated Mobile Channel,” 2003. |
Chang, Nicholas B. et al., “Optimal Channel Probing and Transmission Scheduling for Opportunistics Spectrum Access,” Sep. 2007. |
Tsunekawa, Kouichi, “Diversity Antennas for Portable Telephones”, 39th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 50-56, vol. 1, Gateway to New Concepts in Vehicular Technology, May 1-3, 1989, San Francisco, CA. |
Hirayama et al., Next-Generation Mobil-Access IP Network, Hitachi Review, vol. 49 (2000), No. 4, pp. 176-179. |
Hjalmtysson et al., Overcoming Last-Hop/First-Hop Problems in IP Multicast, Reykjavik University, Dept. of Computer Science, Ofanleiti 2, 103 Reykjavik, Iceland, (The Icelandic Centre for Research under grant No. 020500002.). |
Visoottiviseth et al., Sender-Initiated Multicast Forwarding Scheme, Telecommunications, 2003, ICT 2003 10th International Conference, pp. 334-339, downloaded on Mar. 26, 2009 from IEEE Xplore, 0-7803-7661 (c) 2003 IEEE. |
Tang et al., Mac Reliable Broadcast in Ad Hoc Networks, Computer Science Dept., University of California, Los Angeles, pp. 1008-1013, 0-7803-7225 (c) 2001 IEEE. |
EP Application No. 10813061.8. Supplementary European Search Report dated Jul. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/736,017 Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2013. |
CN Application No. 20058001629.7, Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,865, Office Action mailed Dec. 20, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,715, Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/181,274, Office Action mailed Nov. 15, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/181,274, Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/938,316, Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,800, Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2012. |
Akyildiz et al., “Wireless mesh networks: a survey,” Computer Networks, 2005. |
Cato et al., “Method for Easier, Better, and Faster Site Surveys for Wireless Networks,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 40, No. 1, 1997. |
Chawla, “Design of a Wireless Backhaul Network for Microcells,” 1999. |
Fair queuing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/fair—queuing. Aug. 11, 2008. |
Gillham, Burce et al. JUNOSe Internet Software for E-Series Routing Platforms Policy and QoS Confirguaration Guide, Release 7.0x, Sep. 7, 2005. |
Johansson et al., “Relaying Access Points and Related Business Models for Low Cost Mobile Systems,” 2004. |
Weighted Fair Queuing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted—fair—queuing. |
Weighted Round Robin, http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted—round—robin. |
Yanikomeroglu, “Cellular Multihop Communications: Infrastructure—Based Relay Network Architecture for 4G Wireless Systems,” 2004. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US08/014148 mailed Mar. 30, 2009. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US11/059019 mailed Feb. 21, 2012. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US05/039760 mailed Sep. 14, 2006. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US10/56908 mailed May 3, 2011. |
EP Application No. 10813061.8. Supplementary European Search Report dated Oct. 13, 2011. |
TW Application No. 094138837, Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2013. |
TW Application No. 094138837, Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,196, Office Action mailed May 15, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,196, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,196, Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,477, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,477, Office Action mailed Jun. 16, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,477, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,477, Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,866, Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,866, Office Action mailed May 29, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,715, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,715, Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,715, Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/181,274, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/181,274, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 18, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,800, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,803, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,803, Office Action mailed Aug. 27, 2012. |
Cato et aL, “Method for Easier, Better, and Faster Site Surveys for Wireless Networks,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 40, No. 1, 1997. |
Fair queuing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/fair—queuing. |
Gillham, Burce et al. JUNOSe Internet Software for E-Series Routing Platforms Policy and QoS Confirguaration Guide, Release 7.0x. |
Johansson et aL, “Relaying Access Points and Related Business Models for Low Cost Mobile Systems,” 2004. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US05/039760 mailed May 3, 2011. |
Chinese Application No. 201080002467.X, Second Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,402 Office Action mailed Oct. 22, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/080,488, Office Action mailed Oct. 21, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,323, Office Action mailed Oct. 14, 2014. |
Chinese Application No. 20058001629.7, Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2014. |
Chinese Application No. 201080002467.X, Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2014. |
Chinese Application No. 20058001629.7, Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,514, Office Action mailed Sep. 22, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,323, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2015. |
Taiwan Application No. 103106913, Office Action dated May 28, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,800, Office Action mailed Mar. 19. 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,803, Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060098616 A1 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60625331 | Nov 2004 | US |