This application is a §371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2011/056838 filed Apr. 29, 2011, and claims priority from German Patent Application Nos. 10 2010 028 402.5filed Apr. 30, 2010 and 10 2010 031 438.2 filed Jul. 16, 2010.
The invention relates to a hip socket and a socket insert for a hip joint prosthesis, wherein the socket insert is coupled to the hip socket by means of a damping cone of a conical damping connection in the equatorial region of the two components, and beneath the damping cone a gap is situated between the two components up to the pole, the gap being delimited by the radial contours of the two components.
Various materials are used for achieving a biocompatible, low-wear bearing for modern hip joint prostheses. The so-called hard-hard pairings according to the prior art are best suited for long-term reliable care of the patient. In these pairings, the bail head mounted on the hip stem as well as the socket insert mounted in the hip socket are made of a hard material in the technical sense. Ceramic-ceramic and metal-metal pairings are presently in use. Current studies are also investigating the clinical effects of the ceramic-metal pairing.
To provide the surgeon with the opportunity to intra-operatively select the optimal slide pairing for the patient, modern hip joint prostheses have a modular design (see
The coupling between the socket insert and the hip socket is achieved with a direct coupling without the insertion of an adapter material such as plastic, and as a rule, by means of a conical clamping connection. Approaches in this regard are described in EP 0 649 641, EP 0 826 347, and DE 196 54 409, for example. The components are usually coupled by a clamping cone situated in the so-called equatorial region of the hip socket. For an illustration of the term “equatorial,” see
The need for avoiding contact of the components in the back-side region of the socket insert (the geometric area beneath the clamping cone up to the pole) is based on the following:
It is assumed that a controlled back-side contact of the components, while avoiding or solving the described problems, results in a reduction in the tensile stresses in the socket insert, which has a positive effect in particular when ceramic socket inserts are used. The breaking load of the socket inserts would thus be significantly increased. When socket inserts made of metal alloy are used, it is expected that the reduction in the stresses results in less deformation. This may result in a reduction in the load-induced shape deviation of the sliding surfaces and a decrease in the wear of the sliding partners.
Some studies emphasize the need for the back-side gap between components having this or a similar geometry.
The object of the invention is to improve a hip socket and a socket insert for a hip joint prosthesis in such a way that a reduction in the tensile stresses in the socket insert is achieved.
According to the invention, this object is achieved by the features udescribed herein.
As a result of the radial contours of the two components having identical geometric elements in the same sequence, starting from the lower cone end to the pole, and tangential or substantially tangential transitions occurring between the geometric elements, a reduction in the tensile stresses in the socket insert is achieved.
In one preferred embodiment, the gap is an initial gap which is largest in the unloaded state of the socket insert, and which decreases when load is applied to the socket insert, and which is at least partially closed above a certain load, so that contact of the components also occurs beneath the clamping cone. The breaking load of the socket insert is thus significantly increased by a controlled backside contact.
The width of the initial gap between the components in the unloaded state of the socket insert in the region near the cone is preferably less than or equal to the width of the gap in the region of the pole.
Alternatively, the width of the initial gap between the components in the unloaded state of the socket insert continuously increases, starting from the region near the cone to the pole.
The hip socket is preferably made of metal and has thin walls, and thus has a particularly flexible design. As a result, when load is applied to the socket insert the hip socket may expand, and the socket insert on the clamping cone may slide into the interior of the hip socket until, above a certain load, contact of the components also occurs beneath the clamping cone.
The socket insert is advantageously made of ceramic, and is preferably made of an aluminum oxide ceramic or mixed ceramics based on aluminum oxide or zirconium oxide, or a silicon-nitride ceramic.
In one embodiment of the invention, the back side of the socket insert, exactly the same as the internal geometry of the hip socket, has the design of a portion of a ball sphere.
In one embodiment, except for on the clamping cone, the radius Rinsert back side (RER) of the back side of the socket insert is greater than or equal to the radius Rsocket pole (RPP) of the internal geometry of the hip socket.
At the transition between the clamping cone and the ball sphere, the rounding radius (Rinsert rounding) of the back side of the socket insert is preferably equal to the rounding radius (Rsocket rounding) of the internal geometry of the hip socket.
One preferred embodiment is characterized in that, at the transition between the clamping cone and the ball sphere, in each case a rounding radius is present, and Rinsert back side (RER) is approximately the same as Rsocket pole (RPP), and Rinsert rounding (REV) is larger than Rsocket rounding (RPV), the socket insert is made of aluminum oxide-mixed ceramic, and the hip socket is a thin-walled metal socket.
The following approach is proposed to avoid the above-described problems and to achieve a so-called controlled back-side contact, or also a “controlled base contact”:
The back-side geometry of the socket insert and the internal geometry of the hip socket are coordinated with one another in such a way that
The invention is explained in greater detail below with reference to three figures.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 028 402 | Apr 2010 | DE | national |
10 2010 031 438 | Jul 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/056838 | 4/29/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/22/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/135074 | 11/3/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5824107 | Tschirren | Oct 1998 | A |
5879397 | Kalberer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5919236 | Pfaff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6797007 | Von Chamier et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7393362 | Cruchet et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8226728 | Preuss et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8419800 | Tuke et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20050033442 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
196 54 409 | Apr 1998 | DE |
198 13 074 | Sep 1999 | DE |
0 649 641 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0 796 598 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 826 347 | Mar 1998 | EP |
1 025 814 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 066 806 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 442 727 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2008015286 | Feb 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130046388 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |