The general field of invention is alternative energy.
There has long been motivation for alternative energy sources to reduce the dependency on non-renewable energy sources such as oil and coal. There has long been interest in harnessing wind to generate electricity, particularly in areas with a high or relatively continuous stream of wind energy.
There have been challenges with previously proposed solutions for harnessing wind energy through use of electric wind turbines. These large windmill-type structures suffer from many disadvantages, including the inability to adjust to variable wind conditions in either or both direction and velocity. Due to the size and mass of large wind turbines, it may be costly to adapt the wind turbine design to every possible operating environment. Prior wind turbines may also suffer from inefficient and complex designs.
Prior wind turbine configurations may suffer from relatively low efficiency rates due to standard configurations that are employed in operating environments not suitable for the particular wind turbine design or initial set-up. In an attempt to overcome these deficiencies, prior wind turbine designs may use various mechanisms, such as segmented blades, weights, flaps, actuators, sensors, motors and springs, in an effort to improve efficiency and control a rotational speed of the rotors to try and keep them from experiencing an overspeed condition. These prior configurations may also use additional forces, such as centrifugal force, centripetal force, and mechanical and electromechanical forces, to alter an aerodynamic orientation or shape of the blade in an attempt to control the rotational speed of the rotors. This in turn may cause a less efficient blade orientation and create a “governing” position that reduces the risk of encountering an overspeed condition at the expense of turbine efficiency.
Previously disclosed methods for estimating alignment of the blades with the wind source in both direction and blade angle of attack may also negatively affect efficiency. Blade alignment is typically determined using averaged data collected over a given time duration, not in real time. This may result in a less than optimal blade orientation for the current wind conditions and a corresponding drop in turbine efficiency.
Thus it is desirable to improve on prior wind turbine designs to increase the turbine's ability to harness the wind energy, improve the efficiency in converting the wind energy to electricity by responding quicker to wind speed and wind direction changes, enable the wind turbine to operate through a larger range of wind speeds, and to simplify and improve their design and operation.
The present invention relates to electric wind turbines and methods for varying the orientation and/or shape of the rotor blades to better adapt to changing wind conditions and increase the capture of wind energy. One method of varying the shape involves varying the twist of the rotor blade as discussed in more detail herein.
In one example of the wind turbine invention, a first or front rotor and a second or rear rotor are used on opposing ends of the power transmission housing or nacelle. In alternate examples of this invention, the rotor blades include separate blade sections that are able to freely rotate relative to each section through a predetermined range to balance aerodynamic forces acting on the airfoils by passively adjusting an angle of attack for each blade section in response to changing wind speeds and conditions occurring at different positions along the path of rotation and thereby changing the orientation and/or twist of the entire blade.
In an alternate example, the individual rotor blade supports extend from a central hub and are able to rotate about the blade support axis independent of all other blade supports, and passively change the rotational position of the entire blade to balance the aerodynamic forces acting on the airfoils by passively adjusting an angle of attack of the blade in response to different wind speeds or changing wind conditions.
In an another example, both the separate sections of the individual rotor blade and the rotor blade support are able to rotate through predetermined ranges to further increase the adaptability of the wind turbine to the wind conditions.
In an alternate example of a two rotor design, the wind turbine acts similar to a turbine engine. The first rotor blades act like the stator blades in the turbine engine by setting up the wind for the rear rotor. The first rotor/stator blades also redirect the wind to provide a more efficient angle of attack on the second rotor blades. This stator and rotor effect increases the ability to harness the wind energy for increased electrical output and efficiency.
In an alternate example of a two rotor design, the first rotor blades are not as long as the blades on the downwind second rotor blades to provide a passive yaw condition that improves the ability to harness the wind energy for increased electrical output and efficiency.
In alternate examples where only a single rotor is used, the above mentioned examples of utilizing separate blade sections passively rotatable with respect to each section and/or passive rotation of the blade support relative to a central hub may be used depending on the geographic location and anticipated climate conditions.
The invention further includes a variable twist wind turbine rotor blade that passively adjusts the blade twist to balance the aerodynamic forces on the airfoils to adjust the angle of attack in response to the immediate wind conditions confronting the blade. The change or variation in twist, in one example, uses separate blade sections that are independently rotatable with respect to the blade support such that the change in rotation of the separate blade sections alters an overall shape of the airfoil or twist of the blade. In another example, the blade sections are rotatable with respect to other blade section(s). In a third example, the blade support is freely rotatable in a two dimensional plane parallel to the mounting surface with respect to a hub to change an orientation of a portion of the blade or the entire blade.
The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
Various examples of an inventive wind turbine 20 are shown in
In the example shown in
Referring to
In one example of wind turbine 20, blade supports 40 are rigidly fixed to the spindles 36 and do not translate or rotate relative to spindles 36 or front hub 32. In an alternate example, blade supports 40 are configured to rotate relative to spindles 36 about blade axis 42. In this example, spindles 36 may include a bearing within spindle 36 to secure blade support 40 while permitting rotation about blade axis 42. Blade support 40 may be freely rotatable about blade axis 42 through a predetermined and limited angle of rotation through mechanical stops or barriers similar to that described later with respect to the blade sections. Rotation of blade support 40 is entirely passive in the illustrated embodiments. Wind turbine 20 does not use any electrical, electro-mechanical or mechanical mechanisms, including sensor, flaps, actuators, motors, springs or flyweights, to impart a force or energy to forcibly rotate blade support 40 relative to the respective spindle 36. Rather, the force that produces rotation of blade support 40 relative to spindle 36 is the result of aerodynamic forces acting on a blade 44 attached to blade support 40 that act to passively adjust an angle of attack of blade 44 to help optimize performance and efficiency of the wind turbine 20.
Blade supports 40 radially extend from the rotational axis 38 and define a geometric plane 48 through which part, or substantially all, of blade supports 40 lie in and rotate through in operation. In one example, blade supports 40 are hollow, rigid tubular rods made from steel. Other lengths and numbers of blade supports 40, as well as different materials and mechanical connections may be used without deviating from the invention. In one example, blade supports 40 are made from composite materials, such as carbon fiber reinforced resin.
With continued reference to
Blade 44 may be made from a variety of materials, including, but not limited to, reinforced resin or polycarbonate. An outer skin of the blade 44 defines a substantially hollow interior cavity that may include internal reinforcing ribs as needed to meet a particular application and performance requirements. Other materials, such as lightweight ferrous and non-ferrous metals, composites, as well as other materials and constructions, may be also be employed. Although three blades 44 for first rotor 28 are illustrated, alternatively a greater or less number of blade supports 40 and associated blades 44 may be used to suit particular application and performance requirements.
In one example of wind turbine 20, first rotor blades 44, when assembled and connected to the respective blade supports 40, form a single piece blade unit that is rigidly fixed to blade support 40. Blade 44 does not translate or rotate relative to blade support 40. Instead, blade support 40 supporting the single unit fixed blade 44 is capable of rotating about blade axis 42 with respect to first hub spindle 36, as previously described. Rotation of blade support 40 adjusts, modifies or varies an angle of attack of the respective blade 44 relative to the wind source 46. Blade support 40 and blade 44 passively rotate in substantial unison in response to changes in the aerodynamic forces acting along the pressure and leeward surfaces 58, 60 of the blade 44, respectively, to increase an ultimate power output of generator 26 and/or increase an efficiency with which power is generated. Passive rotation of blade support 40 and blade 44 occurs without active controls or other artificially generated (e.g., electrical or mechanical) forces, and is in response to the aerodynamic forces acting on the blade 44. Changes in the wind source 46, such as speed and direction, affect the aerodynamic forces acting on blade 44 and cause support 40 and blade 44 to rotate relative to spindle 36 to adjust the angle of attack of blade 44. As described in greater detail subsequently, the response characteristics of blade 44 to changes in wind source 46 may be tailored for a particular application by adjusting the location of blade support 40 relative to a maximum thickness of blade 44. The position of blade support 40 (which defines the blade axis of rotation 42) relative to blade 44 determines, at least in part, how blade 44 responds to changes in the wind source 46 to change the angle of attack. The passively adjustable control system for regulating the angle of attack of blade 44 operates continuously in real time to accommodate changes in wind source 46 to optimize the performance and efficiency of wind turbine 20.
Blade 44 may alternatively be rotatably attached to support 40, rather than configuring blade 44 and blade support 40 as a unitized structure that rotate together, as previously described. With this configuration, blade support 40 may be prevented from rotating relative to spindle 36. Blade 44 may include one or more bearings, which may be configured substantially the same or similar to that shown in
With reference to
In
Each blade section 62, 64 and 66 is free to rotate about blade axis 42 independent of the other. The twist in blade 44 may be modified by rotating one or more of the blade sections 62, 64 and 66 relative to one another about support 40 to independently optimize an angle of attack of the individual blade section for the wind source 46. For example, in
The blade 44 and blade sections 62, 64 and 66 may be configured as a substantially straight blade or may include a twist. The exemplary blade 44 and blade sections 62, 64 and 66 are illustrated in the figures as having little or no twist. Alternatively, the blade 44 and one or more of the blade sections 62, 64 and 66 may include a twist. An example of a twisted blade section 62 is illustrated in
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
It is understood that other forms of bearings and ways to enable rotation of the blade sections about support 40 and blade axis 42 may be used. It is further contemplated that bearing 74 may be positioned in other orientations, for example other than in the interior cavity 72 of the blade section.
With reference to
With continued reference to
With reference also to
Although
With reference to
The pivot limiter 110 may include an elongated stop pin 116. An end 118 of the stop pin 116 may be attached to the blade support 40. The stop pin 116 extends generally radially outward from the blade support 40. At least a portion of the stop pin 116 is movably positioned within an elongated slot 120 formed in the pivot block 112. The slot 120 may extend entirely through the pivot block 112 and be open to an exterior of the blade section, as illustrated for example in
The length L of the slot 120 determines the maximum allowable axial rotation of blade section 64 relative to blade section 62. On rotation of second section 64 relative to blade support 40, a predetermined maximum amount of angular rotation may be achieved through a hard mechanical stop of the stop pin 116 at an end 122 of the slot 120. Stop pin 116 may be made from ferrous or non-ferrous metals or other materials suitable for the particular application. Structures other than the pin 116 and slot 120 may be employed as a stop for controlling the maximum angular rotation of the blade section.
In one example, the axial lengths of the individual first 62, second 64 and third 66 blade sections between first end cap 68 and second end cap 70 along blade axis 42 are not equal to reduce potential harmonic motion conditions or effects. It is understood that equal length blade sections may also be used with that consideration in mind or otherwise addressed through other measures.
One way of determining the axial lengths of the individual sections of blade 44 is to consider the blade twist. Conventionally, wind turbine blades are not “flat” in their geometry. They are designed with a twist such that the ratio of the rotational speed of the tip versus the wind speed is approximately 8:1, so that a blade has a change in angle along the blade length. For example, the blade at one-eighth of the axial length from the tip experiences only one degree difference in the angle relative to the tip, while the innermost eighth of the blade experiences a 45 degree difference in the angle relative to the tip. In theory, a large number of blade sections are desirable such that the change in the angle over the length of each section would be minimized and roughly equal to the other sections. Such a design would provide the most efficient use of the wind. It would also give an infinite number of cross section speed ratios and closely match any wind speed. In practice, however, manufacture of multiple sections is difficult, and multiple sections increase part count and maintenance expenses. Balancing these consideration results in one possible design described herein, where first 62, second 64 and third 66 blade sections are used. Although illustrated with three separate sections, first blade section 62, second blade section 64 and third blade section 66, it is understood that a fewer or greater number of blade sections may be used to suit the particular application or performance requirements.
The wind source 46 flowing over the blade 44 or blade sections 62, 64 and/or 66 generate aerodynamic forces acting along the wind bearing surface 58 and leeward surface 60 of the blade or blade section. The aerodynamic forces may result in a pitching moment tending to rotate the blade or blade section around the blade pivot axis 42. Changes in the wind source 46, such as wind speed or direction, may alter the aerodynamic forces and resulting pitching moment acting on the blade or blade section. Adjusting the angle of attack or twist of the blade or blade section may also cause changes in the aerodynamic forces and pitching moment acting on the blade or blade section. The blade or blade section react to these changes by passively rotating clockwise about blade pivot axis 42, as shown for example in
Due to the passive nature of the permitted rotation, the blade 44 or blade sections 62, 64 or 66 freely rotate with respect to blade support 40 within the limits imposed by pivot limiter 110. In the example of pivot limiter 110 using pins 116 and slots 106, as shown for example in
With reference also to
Dimension 126 represents a maximum thickness of the blade section 62 measured perpendicular to the cord line 124, which for this particular blade section occurs at a distance 128 from the blade leading edge 54. Due to the symmetry of blade section 62, the chord line 124 bisects the blade, such that a dimension 130 measured perpendicular from the chord line 124 to the blade surface at the blade maximum thickness is substantially half the maximum blade thickness 126. Dimension 132 is a distance measured along the cord line 124 from the blade leading edge 54 to the pivot point 123, or center of the blade support 40. The blade support 40 is preferably positioned forward of a maximum thickness plane 133, coinciding with the maximum blade thickness, to provide an aerodynamically stable airfoil capable of passively responding to changes in wind conditions by pivoting the blade section 62 to maintain a suitable angle of attack. Generally, the closer blade support 40 is positioned to the maximum thickness plane 133 the less aerodynamically stable the blade will be. Preferably the blade support 40 is positioned relative to the maximum thickness plane, such that dimension 132 is not more than approximately 95% of dimension 128 to create an aerodynamically stable airfoil.
Positioning the blade support 40 outside of the preferred range (i.e., distance 132 between 0-95% of distance 128) may require the use of additional control mechanisms to accommodate the aerodynamic instability that may occur and to maintain control of the blade orientation, and in particular, blade angle of attack. For example, the blade may require use of adjustable trailing and/or leading edge flaps capable of actively modifying the aerodynamic shape and/or orientation of the blade to accommodate the unstable forces acting on the airfoil as a result of locating blade support 40 outside the preferred range. This may of course add considerable cost, weight and complexity to the wind turbine. Also, it may not be feasible to employ movable flaps if the blade section includes twist, such as shown for example in
In an alternative configuration illustrated for example in
In the exemplary configuration shown in
One difference between the first rotor 28 and the second rotor 30 is that, in a preferred configuration, second rotor 30 rotates in an opposite direction about rotational axis 38 relative to first rotor 28. In the example shown in
With continued reference to
Through having the second rotor 30 and the described orientation of the blades with respect to one another, the second rotor 30 provides additional conversion of wind energy into electricity over prior single blade assembly designs. The wind turbine design acts similar to a turbine engine. The first rotor blades act like the stator blades in the turbine engine by setting up the wind for the rear rotor. The first rotor 28 also redirects the wind to provide a more efficient angle of attack on the second rotor blades 136. The difference in this wind turbine design, as shown for example in
With particular reference to
In operation, a two rotor configuration creates an added benefit of passive yaw control. The rotor/stator effect of the first rotor 28, as described above, sets a direction of the wind source 46 into the second rotor 30. The second rotor 30, due to the longer blade length and counter rotating rotor, acts as a tail to cause the first rotor 28 to steer into the wind source 46. This steering effect is a result of the wind source 134 interacting with the wind turbine 20, eliminating the need to use any electrical, mechanical or electro-mechanical mechanisms to control the orientation of the wind turbine relative to the wind source.
As described above, the orientation of blades 44 of first rotor 28 passively adjust according to the wind conditions at the point of contact with the respective blade wind bearing surface 58. The blade 44 or respective blade sections, 62, 64 and 66, will rotate relative to blade support 40, and in the examples illustrated, with respect to adjacent blade sections about blade axis 42. There are no electrical, mechanical or electro-mechanical actuators, mechanisms or links interconnecting the blades. This enables independent passive variation of the blade orientation, and optionally the geometry or twist of the blades, to occur continuously throughout the rotation of the rotor about rotational axis 38 based solely on the aerodynamic forces acting on the blade to achieve an optimized angle of attack in response to the varying wind conditions provided by wind source 46.
In operation, where a variation in blade orientation is desired to accommodate changes in wind speed and direction, several optional methods have been disclosed. The blades 44 and 136 may be configured to be a single unit fixed to a rotatable blade support 40138, respectively, a multi-section blade wherein the blade sections are capable of rotating with respect to one another, a multi-section blade wherein the blade sections are mounted on a fixed blade support 44 and are capable of rotating independently of one another with respect to the fixed blade support 44, or an example where the blade includes both the rotatable blade sections as well as a rotatable blade support 44, 138. In each of the examples, the individual blade sections and/or the blade support 44, 138 are capable of independently and passively rotating through their predefined angles of movement to adjust or accommodate changing wind conditions. This independent passive adaptability, for example to accommodate often different wind speeds and directions at the lowest point in the swept area of the blade 44, 136 rotation versus wind speed and direction at the apex of blade 44, 136 rotation about rotational axis 38 at any given moment, provides a significant advantage over prior designs by increasing efficiency of operation and electrical output. Note that although all blade sections of a multi-section blade are described in the example as freely rotating, one blade section of the three, or more blade sections where there are more than three blade sections, could be fixed to the blade support 40, 138.
While the invention has been described in connection with certain embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures as is permitted under the law.
This application is a continuation-in-part and claims benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/541,590, filed on Aug. 14, 2009, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/541,603, filed on Aug. 14, 2009, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,454,313 on Jun. 4, 2013, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12541590 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 14323744 | US |