The invention generally relates to diffusion flame combustors for turbine engines and more particularly to a nozzle system and a method for supplying water in the form of liquid water to such diffusion flame combustors, where the water is provided to the combustor via three independently controlled injection locations in the nozzle.
The world's energy needs continue to rise—thus creating a demand for reliable, affordable, efficient and environmentally-compatible power generation. A gas turbine engine is one known machine that provides efficient power, and often has application for an electric generator in a power plant, or engines in an aircraft or a ship. A typical gas turbine engine includes a compressor section, a combustion section and a turbine section. The compressor section provides a compressed airflow to the combustion section where the air is mixed with a fuel, such as natural gas. The combustion section includes a plurality of circumferentially disposed combustors that receive the fuel to be mixed with the air and ignited to generate a working gas. The working gas expands through the turbine section and is directed across rows of blades therein by associated vanes. As the working gas passes through the turbine section, it causes the blades to rotate, which in turn causes a shaft to rotate, thereby providing mechanical work.
The temperature of the working gas is tightly controlled so that it does not exceed some predetermined temperature for a particular turbine engine design because too high of a temperature can damage various components in the turbine section of the engine. However, it is desirable to cause the temperature of the working gas to be as high as possible without causing damage—because the higher the temperature of the working gas, the faster the flow of the gas, which results in more efficient operation of the engine.
In one known gas turbine engine design, the combustion section includes a fuel nozzle assembly, a combustor and a transition component, where the fuel nozzle assembly introduces fuel and cooling water into the combustor where it is mixed with air and burned, and the hot combustion gases pass through the transition component into the turbine section. Although the designs of the fuel nozzle assembly, the combustor and the transition component have been well developed over the years, continuous improvements in turbine performance, efficiency and durability are always sought after.
NOx is a generic term for mono-nitrogen oxides including NO (nitric oxide) and NO2 (nitrogen dioxide). Turbine combustor development focuses on meeting exhaust NOx emissions without negatively impacting other critical areas that are part of the overall system design. With diffusion flame combustors, water or steam can be injected into the combustor to control NOx emissions. However, injecting water can cause unwanted stability problems in the form of high combustor dynamics and durability issues with respect to liner cracking. The development of such systems requires a delicate balance of these competing design criteria—emissions, dynamics, and hardware life. Flexibility in water injection through the nozzle is key to achieving an optimum balance.
In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, a turbine engine combustion system is disclosed including a fuel nozzle assembly having three independently controlled stages of water injection. The intent of introducing water through a third stage is to improve mixing of water with other fluids in the combustor basket. The increased interaction between water jets and external aerodynamic forces promotes early formation of water droplets due to increase in the surface energy of the jets which lowers the surface tension. A first stage includes water mixed with a gaseous fuel upon inlet to the nozzle, where the first stage water mixes and travels with the gaseous fuel to be injected into a combustor. A second stage includes water injected into the combustor via a secondary liquid nozzle which is used for fuel oil during liquid fuel operation, but which may be used for the secondary water during gaseous fuel operation. A third stage includes water injected into the combustor via a plurality of orifice nozzle holes collectively known as an atomizing air cap. The atomizing air cap nozzles are used to atomize the fuel during fuel oil operation ignition to improve start up reliability, and can be used for water injection during gaseous fuel operation. An algorithm and criteria are also defined for controlling the three stages of water injection to achieve the optimum balance of turbine operational criteria including NOx emissions, combustion dynamics and water impingement on the combustor basket walls and the transition piece downstream of the nozzle.
Additional features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The following discussion of the embodiments of the invention directed to three stage water injection in a diffusion burner for a gas turbine engine is merely exemplary in nature, and is in no way intended to limit the invention or its applications or uses.
It is desirable for gas turbine engines such as the engine 10 to produce very hot combustion gases in order to enhance turbine efficiency. However, very hot combustion gases are known to cause an increase in NOx (oxides of nitrogen) emissions. Injecting water into the turbine combustors 26 via a fuel nozzle is a technique known in the art for controlling combustion gas temperature to reduce NOx emissions and improve component durability. However, the use of water injection is not without its own problems.
Water which is injected into the combustors 26 without proper atomization or vaporization can impinge on combustor basket walls, causing localized thermal shock cooling which may damage the combustor basket wall. Too much water injection can also cause problems with combustion quality in the combustors 26. Furthermore, attempting to inject too much water into the stream of gaseous fuel in the water injection donut (discussed below) can actually cause a back-pressure which restricts fuel flow. For these and other reasons, a nozzle which offers increased flexibility in water injection is desired.
Additionally, water is injected into a burning flame zone 116 in the combustor 114 downstream of the fuel nozzle assembly 100. Injecting water into both the fuel 104 and the flame zone 116 can provide better control of NOx emissions, and provides flexibility in meeting other turbine operational criteria. As used herein, water refers to its various phases, including liquid or vapor, and combinations of liquid and vapor, and including droplets. Water may be referred herein to alternatively as liquid, vapor or steam. In the nozzle assembly 100, the water injected directly into the flame zone 116 includes a secondary stage and a tertiary stage, as discussed below.
A secondary water line 118 supplies an optional second stage of water injection to the fuel nozzle assembly 100. Specifically, the second stage of water injection, from the secondary water line 118, is provided to a secondary liquid nozzle 120 (
A tertiary water line 126 supplies an optional third stage of water injection to the fuel nozzle assembly 100. Specifically, the third stage of water injection, from the tertiary water line 126, is provided to an atomizing air cap 128 (
The secondary water line 118 and the tertiary water line 126 are typically used in combination with the primary water line 106. Logic used in designating total water injection amount—and splits between primary, secondary and tertiary stages—is discussed below. The primary water line 106, the secondary water line 118 and the tertiary water line 126 are typically supplied by the same water source via a water supply and control network, discussed below.
A plurality of swirlers 134 are situated in a circumferential pattern radially outward from the primary fuel outlet 112. The swirlers 134 provide a path for combustion air to enter the combustor 114. The swirlers 134 induce a rotational motion in the combustion air, thus promoting a higher degree of mixing leading to near complete combustion in the combustor 114.
A water line 160 includes a primary flow meter 162 and a primary water injection throttle valve 164 which are used to provide a controlled flow of primary (stage I) injection water to the primary water line 106. As shown in
A controller 190 is in communication with the flow meters 162/172/182 and the throttle valves 164/174/184, where the controller 190 controls the opening position of the throttle valves 164/174/184 to establish the desired flow rates of primary, secondary and tertiary injection water. Determination of the desired flow rates, for any turbine load point, is discussed below. A water return line 192 and a water return valve 194 allow for recirculation of water, provided by the pump 156 but not consumed by the water lines 160/170/180, to the tank 152.
As discussed previously, achieving all turbine operational performance criteria can be a difficult balance, particularly during high load operations. The three stage water injection capability of the nozzle system 100 together with the water supply and control network 150 provides increased flexibility and capability to achieve the required balance. A turbine engine, such as the turbine engine 10, can be operated at a wide range of load points, from very low load (about 10%) to maximum load (100%). The total amount of water injection varies with the load point, where higher load points require more water in proportion to fuel (expressed as water:fuel ratio or W:F). Similarly, the proportional splits between primary, secondary and tertiary water also change as a function of load point, where low load points may exhibit satisfactory performance using only primary water, and high load points may require all three stages of water injection.
In order to run the tuning process of the flowchart diagram 200, the turbine which is being “tuned” (determining optimum water injection rates) must be instrumented with a variety of sensors to collect data. This includes temperature sensors (thermocouples) and combustor pressure sensors which are not typically installed for normal operations of the turbine, along with items such as fuel flow sensors and NOx emissions sensors which are used during normal operations of the turbine. In the tuning process of the flowchart diagram 200, when water flow rate parameters are set to certain values, they are set to these values for all of the nozzles in the turbine—that is, for example, for the nozzle for each of the combustors 26 in the turbine 10 of
At box 202, the turbine which is being tuned is set to a first load point, such as 10% of peak power. In the subsequent steps, the optimum water injection parameters for the 10% load point will be determined and stored, in a look-up table or other firmware setting used by the controller 190, and then the turbine will be set to the next load point (such as 20%). At decision diamond 204, conventional tuning processes are used to determine whether single stage water injection (via the primary water line 106, mixing water with the gaseous fuel 104) is satisfactory in meeting operational criteria. At a low load point such as 10% where not a lot of water injection is needed in order to control NOx emissions, it may be the case that a simple single stage of water injection is satisfactory. In that case, the optimum water:fuel ratio (W:F) for single stage water injection at the load point will be determined. This can be determined using existing known processes, or using the techniques discussed below for three stage water injection. At box 206, if single stage injection is satisfactory at the decision diamond 204, the configuration parameters for the current load point are stored (for example, primary water only, at a particular W:F ratio or flow rate), and the process returns to the box 202 to where the turbine is set to the next load point.
If, at the decision diamond 204, it is determined that single stage water injection is not satisfactory to meet operational criteria, then at decision diamond 208, conventional tuning processes are used to determine whether two stage water injection (via the primary water line 106 and the secondary water line 118) is satisfactory in meeting operational criteria. For example, at a load point such as 40% where a moderate amount of water injection is needed in order to control NOx emissions, it may be the case that two stages of water injection are satisfactory. In that case, the optimum water:fuel ratio (W:F) for two stage water injection, along with the splits between stage I (the primary water line 106) and stage II (the secondary water line 118), at the load point will be determined. These can be determined using existing known processes, or using the techniques discussed below for three stage water injection. At box 206, if two stage injection is satisfactory at the decision diamond 208, the configuration parameters for the current load point are stored (for example, overall W:F ratio, and split between stage I and stage II), and the process returns to the box 202 to where the turbine is set to the next load point.
If, at the decision diamond 208, it is determined that two stage water injection is not satisfactory to meet operational criteria, then three stage water injection is initiated at box 210. As discussed previously, at high load points (above 60% for example), it is possible that the amount of water injection needed for NOx abatement begins to cause detrimental effects in other aspects of turbine performance if the water injection is limited to two stages. This situation is where three stage water injection provides the flexibility and capability to achieve a better balance of all operational criteria.
At box 212, the splits between stage I (the primary water line 106), stage II (the secondary water line 118) and stage III (the tertiary water line 126) are established for the current load point. When the box 212 is first encountered after initiation of three stage injection, the splits can be set to default values—such as 40% stage I, 40% stage II and 20% stage III (these values are given merely as examples). At box 214, the overall W:F ratio is set for the current load point. Again, a default W:F ratio may be set for the first iteration at any given load point. At box 216, turbine operational data is measured by a number of different sensors fitted to the turbine. These may include, for example, a fuel flow rate sensor (for each of the nozzles in the turbine), water flow rate sensors (for each water line for each nozzle), combustor wall/liner temperature (for each of the combustors), combustion gas pressure (for each of the combustors), combustion gas temperature and/or component temperature at various circumferential positions around the turbine stage, and a NOx emissions sensor.
At decision diamond 218, it is determined whether turbine operational performance criteria are met when running with the current values of W:F ratio and splits at the current load point. Several different operational criteria may be considered at the decision diamond 218. These are discussed below, along with their implications on injection water flow rates.
A first operational criteria considered at the decision diamond 218 is whether the fuel gas throttle valve is in control. The gas throttle valve is a valve in the fuel line 102 used to throttle the flow of the gaseous fuel 104. The valve flow vs. position characteristic curve of the valve indicates the position of the valve for a given reference flow set point. The valve is considered to be out of control if the non-linearity between the flow and the position becomes very high; i.e. for a small increase in flow the valve stem displacement becomes very high and reaches maximum limit and loses its capability to reduce error between the reference flow set point and the actual flow. Such an out of control situation may arise from too much primary water being injected via the water injection donut 108, where the high water flow creates a restriction to gas flow and causes back pressure in the fuel line 102. In this case, the amount of primary water injection must be reduced (necessitating an increase in secondary and/or tertiary water injection) in order to regain control of the gas throttle valve.
A second operational criteria considered at the decision diamond 218 is whether NOx emissions are in compliance. Regulations typically require NOx emissions to remain below a prescribed value—such as a concentration of 25 parts per million (PPM) in the turbine exhaust. If NOx emissions are too high, among other things this is an indication that local combustion gas temperatures are too high, thus requiring an increase in water injection. In this case, the overall W:F ratio likely needs to be increased.
A third operational criteria considered at the decision diamond 218 is whether liquid water is impinging on the combustor wall. In high water injection flow situations, it is possible for bulk water coming out of the nozzle assembly 100 not to atomize fully and diffuse with the air/fuel mixture in the flame zone 116. As such, there is a risk of water droplets impinging the wall of the combustor 114; this is undesirable as it can lead to thermal distress in the combustor wall. Water impingement can be detected by placing thermocouples on the combustor walls and monitoring for cool spots. In the case of combustor wall water impingement, the overall W:F ratio should be decreased (if possible without violating NOx emissions constraints), or the stage I/II/III splits should be adjusted.
A fourth operational criteria considered at the decision diamond 218 is whether turbine blade path temperatures are within an acceptable range. In the turbine section 16 of the turbine 10, thermocouples are placed at many circumferential locations. For example, if the turbine 10 includes 14 of the combustors 26, then 14 thermocouples may be placed circumferentially around a turbine stage, where the temperature reading from each thermocouple can be associated with a particular one of the combustors 26. Note that the thermocouples may not reflect the conditions in the combustor 26 which is directly axially aligned with them, but rather may reflect the conditions in a combustor 26 which is at a different circumferential position due to “swirl” of the combustion gases as they flow along the turbine axis. Blade path temperature spreads identify the difference between the minimum and maximum temperature reading of any of the thermocouples and the average temperature reading of all of the thermocouples. A blade path temperature spread which identifies a turbine blade path location significantly cooler than average is indicative of one or more combustors burning lean or receiving too much water, and therefore reaching a flame out condition. A blade path temperature spread which identifies a turbine blade path location significantly hotter than average is normally indicative of hardware breach/rupture in one or more of the fuel nozzles 100. Water injection strategies vary depending on whether blade path temperature spreads indicate cool spots or hot spots.
A fifth operational criteria considered at the decision diamond 218 is whether combustor dynamics are within an acceptable range. Pressure oscillations in and downstream of the combustors 26 are also called combustor dynamics, and are normally an outcome of unsteadiness in the combustion process, which may also be due to flame instability. Pressure sensors are used to measure combustor dynamics. Excessive combustor dynamics may be an indication of too much water being injected, and are unacceptable as the pressure oscillations may cause damage to the turbine. Water injection may need to be reduced or re-balanced between the three stages if excessive combustor dynamics are detected.
If not all of the operational performance criteria discussed above are satisfactory, then at decision diamond 220 it is determined whether the W:F ratio is optimized. If the W:F ratio is not optimized, then the process loops back to the box 214 where the W:F ratio is set to a new value, the turbine is allowed to reach steady state with the new W:F ratio, and data is again measured at the box 216 and evaluated at the decision diamond 218.
If the W:F ratio is optimized at the decision diamond 220, then at decision diamond 222 it is determined whether the water injection splits between stages I/II/III are optimized. If the splits are not optimized, then the process loops back to the box 212 where the splits are set to new values, W:F ratio is left as previously set at the box 214, the turbine is allowed to reach steady state with the new splits, and data is again measured at the box 216 and evaluated at the decision diamond 218. The W:F ratio and the splits may be iteratively adjusted in the two nested loops until they are optimized and all turbine operational criteria are met.
If the W:F ratio is optimized at the decision diamond 220 and the water injection splits are optimized at the decision diamond 222 but the turbine operational criteria are still not met at the decision diamond 218, then there is nothing else that can be done with water injection to meet the turbine operational criteria. In that case, the service engineering department is contacted at box 224 to evaluate the turbine's condition, and some service or maintenance procedure may be needed.
The evaluation of all of the performance criteria discussed above, and the iterative setting of W:F ratio and splits, may be performed manually by an experienced tuning engineer, or may be performed by an algorithm which has been programmed based on knowledge captured from such a tuning engineer.
When the turbine operational criteria are determined to be satisfactory at the decision diamond 218, the three stage injection configuration parameters for the current load point are stored at the box 206 (for example, overall W:F ratio, and split between stages I/II/III), and the process returns to the box 202 to where the turbine is set to the next load point. The process ends after the optimum water injection configuration parameters are stored for the 100% load point.
After the tuning process of the flowchart diagram 200 is completed for all load points up to and including 100%, the turbine can be put into normal operational service and the stored data (overall W:F, and splits) can be used to establish the desired three stage water flow rates for any given load point. In other words, during normal operations of the turbine, the tuning process of the flowchart diagram 200 is not used; the controller 190 simply uses the stored values of W:F and splits for the current turbine load point, and sets the throttle valves 164/174/184 to establish the desired water flow rates for all three stages of water injection.
The systems and method described above, which provide independently controlled three stage water injection in a turbine combustor, offer greater flexibility in meeting turbine operational and performance criteria. In particular, the three stage water injection enables NOx-compliant turbine operation at high load points where conventional single stage or two stage water injection systems would encounter problems with combustion quality, water impingement or fuel flow.
The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion and from the accompanying drawings and claims that various changes, modifications and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/856,973 filed Sep. 17, 2015 which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14856973 | Sep 2015 | US |
Child | 16563186 | US |