Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to wheel constructions, and more particularly, wheels used for casters in furniture, carts, and other movable objects.
2. Description of Related Art
Typically, caster designs tend to fall into one of two groups: the ‘single wheel’ and the ‘twin wheel’. The single wheel caster (
The other main type of caster design is the ‘two wheel’ caster (as represented in
The main problem of the single wheel caster is its inability to turn easily about the pivot. When changing direction, the wheel is required to pivot about the vertical axis of the bracket bearing assembly. Differing portions of the contact area of the wheel tread travel arcs of differing radii, requiring differing linear velocities, thus necessitating that some of the contact area is in rolling contact while other portions are sliding and dragging. The result is wear of the wheel, and greater rolling resistance, particularly at low speeds and tight turns. A narrower wheel minimizes this problem, but results in greater pressure (force per unit area) applied to the floor surface.
The two wheel caster offered an improvement over the single wheel in two important regards. The ability of the wheels to rotate at differing rates or in opposite directions at the same time greatly enhances the ability to turn about the vertical pivot axis, making a change in overall direction of the object much smoother. Also, the separation of the two wheels establishes a wide base for stability. One problem germane to this caster type is the method of attachment of the wheel to the axle. Unlike the single wheel with the clevis bracket supporting the outer ends of the axle, the two wheel design typically attaches each wheel to its respective end of the axle, the vertical pivot shaft being disposed in a plane between the two wheels. The axle is supported medially, and the wheels and the ends of the shaft are relatively unsupported, unprotected, and vulnerable to impact, which can result in collision-damaged wheels or a bent axle. This attachment configuration also creates some inherent stability inefficiencies. By not allowing the axle to extend through the wheel, the loading of the wheel on the axle is not symmetrical. That is, the inside of the wheel is fully loading the axle while the outside is not loading the axle at all. Also, the limited space remaining in the device for the wheel thickness results in thin wheels, which directly result in narrow annular (limited) bearing surfaces of the wheel on the axle. The two wheel design is typically limited to use in office furniture, where more casters are used (i.e., 5 or 6 casters per chair) and the loads on each caster thus are lighter and the objects are not often moved.
The prior art is deficient in providing a wheel that provides the advantages of independently rotating tread portions while avoiding the vulnerabilities of unprotected wheels and axle ends.
The present invention generally comprises a wheel assembly that features two independently rotatable split treads in side-by-side relationship and supported on the same hub assembly. It is significant that the split tread design has substantially the same form factor and dimensions as a prior art single wheel used in a typical caster, as shown in
The wheel assembly includes a pair of wheel disks each having an outer tread formed of rubber or polyurethane compounds and supported on the periphery of a wheel disk. Each disk includes a central opening that receives a ball bearing assembly. A pair of hub inserts are provided, the inserts having central annular surfaces in adjacent relationship. A cylindrical spacer extends about the central annular surfaces and supports the inner races of the bearing assemblies so that the two treads turn independently about the common spacer on their respective bearing assemblies. Thus the independently rotating treads are supported on the same structural element, and combine to define a form factor substantially the same as a typical prior art wheel used in caster assemblies.
A bracket for supporting the wheel assembly includes spaced apart arms disposed to straddle the wheel assembly and impinge on the opposed outer surfaces of the hub inserts. The spacing of the arms is typical of prior art casters that support a single wheel having a single tread. An axle extends through aligned holes in the arms and through central bores in the hub inserts, and is secured by a nut on a threaded distal end of the axle. The arms extend from a mounting bearing disposed to pivot about an axis generally orthogonal to the axle, whereby the bracket may pivot freely about the orthogonal axis. The mounting bracket includes a mounting plate having holes to enable affixing the mounting plate to any movable object. The arms may extend at a rake angle with respect to the mounting bearing so that the caster will pivot to follow any path of motion of the movable object.
The split tread single wheel assembly of the invention may also be employed with other support arrangements, such as a caster mounting bracket that is not pivotable with respect to the movable object, whereby the advantages of the independently rotating split tread are provided to the fixed direction caster assembly.
The present invention generally comprises a wheel assembly that features two independently rotatable split treads in side-by-side relationship, and a clevis-like bracket extending outwardly of the two wheels to support the wheels. The split tread design has substantially the same form factor and dimensions as a prior art single wheel typically used in a caster assembly, as shown in
The wheel assembly 11 may typically be supported by a clevis-like bracket assembly 31, which may include a pivot bearing assembly 32 extending from a mounting plate 33. The configuration and dimensions of the bracket assembly are generally similar to prior art single wheel caster assemblies, and it is a unique aspect of the invention that two independently rotatable treads 14 are supported within this configuration. A pair of arms 34 extend from the bearing assembly, and are spaced apart sufficiently to receive therebetween the wheel assembly 11. An axle 36 extends through aligned holes 38 in distal portions of the arms 34, and also through the central bores 24 of the hub inserts 19, and is secured by a nut 39. The nut 39 is tightened to compress the hub inserts 19 inward against the bearing assemblies 18, which are thus held in their respective lands 23 in the spacer 22. The arms 34 not only support the axle 36, but also serve to protect substantial portions of the wheel assembly 11 from side impact during incidental collisions with other objects. The arms 34 may extend at an angle that diverges from vertical, as shown in
The split treads 14 of the invention rotate completely independently, reducing drag and enabling each tread to increase or decrease speed to accommodate its respective path length through the arc of any turn. Likewise the two treads 14 may counter-rotate whenever the caster is required to pivot about the vertical axis of mounting bearing 32. The load supported by the wheel assembly is distributed evenly about the center line of the wheel, balancing the load to minimize any side load on the bearing 32. Operating noise and vibration can be controlled by selection of the hardness of the tread material, which is also selected in accordance with the expected load, operating environment, and conditions of use, such as towed versus manual applications. The hardness of the tread material also affects ground contact friction, whereby lateral sliding during turns may be controlled.
The wheel disk 13 may be fabricated of any rigid compound or material having sufficient strength and stiffness to support the tread 14 and the bearings 18. Two primary material selections are aluminum for medium to heavy duty applications, and injected plastic for light to medium duty applications. Plastics may be selected for operation in alloy-free environments where tolerate the presence of rust or oxidation cannot be tolerated.
The bearings 18 are preferably precision shielded and sealed ball bearings which reduce rolling resistance. The bearings are greater in diameter than typical wheel assemblies, thus permitting larger diameter balls having greater circumference and yielding lower starting friction and rolling friction. The bearings 18 are each disposed within the nominal plane of their respective wheel disks 13, which increases the rated load capacity of the assembly. A retaining ring 41 may be employed to lock each bearing 18 in place in the respective wheel disk.
Each bearing 18 may be pressed into the respective groove 17 of the respective wheel disk 13, and the retaining rings 41 may then be installed. The wheel disk/bearing assemblies are then assembled to the spacer 22, and the hub inserts 19 are pressed into the central opening of the spacer. This assembly is then secured to the axle as described previously. The hub inserts serve as a built-in thread guard that eliminates debris from becoming wrapped about the axle assembly. Furthermore, the large diameter of the hub inserts acts as a guard for the bearings, reducing considerably the opportunity for debris and liquids to contaminate the bearings. In addition, the hub inserts, together with the spacer and bearings, form a large cross-sectional area solid assembly that extends between the arms 34 and substantially strengthens the distal end portions of the arms 34, wherein the arms are more resistant to collision impact.
The split tread single wheel assembly of the invention may also be employed with a caster mounting bracket that is not pivotable with respect to the movable object, whereby the advantages of the independently rotating split tread are provided to the fixed direction caster assembly.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching without deviating from the spirit and the scope of the invention. The embodiment described is selected to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as suited to the particular purpose contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
556978 | Hetzel | Mar 1896 | A |
1160121 | Allen | Nov 1915 | A |
2541514 | Herold | Feb 1951 | A |
2618490 | Frischmann | Nov 1952 | A |
2995771 | Mullikin | Aug 1961 | A |
3015838 | Ulinski | Jan 1962 | A |
3106408 | Tomaiuolo | Oct 1963 | A |
3628214 | MacKay | Dec 1971 | A |
3818541 | Daniels | Jun 1974 | A |
4054335 | Timmer | Oct 1977 | A |
4122580 | Black | Oct 1978 | A |
4173810 | James | Nov 1979 | A |
4327462 | Eggleston | May 1982 | A |
4706329 | Screen | Nov 1987 | A |
4783880 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5139314 | Deckler | Aug 1992 | A |
5144717 | Siesholtz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149116 | Donze et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5161635 | Kiffe | Nov 1992 | A |
5305496 | Gagnon et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5406675 | White | Apr 1995 | A |
5517718 | Eichhorn | May 1996 | A |
5581843 | Purnell | Dec 1996 | A |
5810373 | Miranda | Sep 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
356742 | Mar 1990 | EP |
09240208 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2002321504 | Nov 2002 | JP |