Patent Grant
8388278
The present invention relates to indexable drills having cutting edges formed of a plurality of indexable inserts. More particularly, the present invention relates to an indexable drill having stable cutting performance and capable of suppressing generation of burrs at a hole exit and a method for arranging inserts without changing the stable cutting performance of the drill even after a drill diameter is changed.
Examples of indexable drills used for forming holes in metal include drills disclosed in Patent Documents 1 and 2 given below and drills shown in
In these drills, a pair of plate-shaped indexable inserts 5 (see
In this type of drill, generally, the drill diameter is changed (drills having different outer diameters are formed) using indexable inserts with the same specification as follows. That is, as shown in
In addition, when the edges engage a workpiece, a central section of the center cutting edge 8 or a central section of the peripheral cutting edge 9 engages the workpiece first.
Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent No. 2704917
Patent Document 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 11-235606
Problems to be Solved by the Invention
In the indexable drill of the related art disclosed in Patent Document 1, a central section of the center cutting edge or the peripheral cutting edge engages the workpiece first. Therefore, the cutting resistance (horizontal force component) at the time of engagement is not stable. This leads to problems such as variations in entrance hole diameter and increase of surface roughness at the entrance side of the hole. In addition, in the case where a through hole is formed, the cutting balance is disturbed when the drill exits the workpiece, which leads to variations in exit hole diameter and increase of surface roughness. When the drill exits the workpiece, an outer peripheral section of the drill exits later and a force which pushes the drill inward from the outer side is generated. Therefore, the hole diameter tends to be reduced at the exit side. Then, when the drill is pulled out from the hole, so-called return marks are often formed on the inner surface of the hole. In addition, burrs are easily generated when the drill exits the workpiece. More specifically, since the outer peripheral section exits later, thin pieces of material that cannot be easily cut remain at positions where the outer peripheral section exits the workpiece. The pieces of material are left without being cut off at the exit edge of a hole 11 formed in a workpiece W, as shown in
In addition, in the above-described method for changing the drill diameter according to the related art, only the peripheral cutting edge is moved in the radial direction while the center cutting edge is fixed. Therefore, a cutting contribution ratio (A:B in
An object of the present invention is to provide an indexable drill which has cutting edges formed of a plurality of indexable inserts and which provides stable performance so that the accuracy of entrance hole diameter and exit hole diameter is improved and generation of burrs at the hole exit can be suppressed, and to maintain the stable cutting performance even after the drill diameter is changed.
Means for Solving the Problems
In order to achieve the above-described object, according to the present invention, an indexable drill which includes at least two polygonal indexable inserts arranged at an end of a drill main body at positions where distances from a drill center differ from each other is structured as follows. That is, a cutting contribution of one of the indexable inserts that is disposed at an inner side of the drill is greater than a cutting contribution of another one of the indexable inserts that is disposed at an outer side of the drill with respect to the indexable insert at the inner side of the drill, and the indexable insert disposed at the outer side of the drill projects forward in an axial direction from the indexable insert disposed at the inner side of the drill. In addition, an outer-end corner of the indexable insert at the outermost position is at a foremost position so that the outer-end corner engages a workpiece first.
Preferred embodiments of the drill are as follows:
(1) The indexable inserts include two indexable inserts which are first and second indexable inserts arranged at the end of the drill main body at positions separated from each other by half turn in the circumferential direction of the drill. The first indexable insert is disposed at the inner side of the drill and forms a center cutting edge. The second indexable insert is disposed at the outer side of the drill and forms the peripheral cutting edge. A ratio between the cutting contribution of the center cutting edge and the cutting contribution of the peripheral cutting edge is set in the range of A:B=52:48 to 55:45.
(2) The first and second indexable inserts are parallelogram-shaped inserts having the same specification. The center cutting edge is formed of a ridgeline at a long side including an obtuse-angled corner of the corresponding parallelogram-shaped insert and inclined such that an outer end of the center cutting edge in the radial direction projects forward in the axial direction. The peripheral cutting edge is formed of a ridgeline at a short side including an acute-angled corner of the corresponding parallelogram-shaped insert and inclined in the same direction as the direction in which center cutting edge is inclined.
(3) Chip discharge flutes are provided in an outer periphery of the drill main body. The flutes are helical flutes which extend substantially ¼ turn around the drill main body 1, and a rise-start point at a terminating end of each helical flute is set at a position separated from the peripheral cutting edge by 85° to 95° in the circumferential direction.
To eliminate the variation in cutting performance when the drill diameter is changed, the present invention also provides a method for arranging inserts in an indexable drill including the steps of arranging first and second indexable inserts at an end of a drill main body at positions where distances from a drill center differ from each other and which are separated from each other by half turn in the circumferential direction of the drill; positioning the second indexable insert at an outer side of the drill so as to project forward in an axial direction from the first indexable insert at an inner side of the drill, so that an outer-end corner of the second indexable insert engages a workpiece first, and setting a ratio between a cutting contribution of a center cutting edge formed of the first indexable insert and a cutting contribution of a peripheral cutting edge formed of the second indexable insert in the range of A:B=52:48 to 55:45; and arranging the first and second indexable inserts at positions where the ratio between the cutting contributions of the center cutting edge and the peripheral cutting edge is maintained within the range of A:B=52:48 to 55:45 when an outer diameter of the indexable drill is changed.
Advantages
According to the drill of the present invention, the outer-end corner of the indexable insert at the outermost position is disposed at a foremost position, so that the outer-end corner engages the workpiece first. Therefore, the cutting resistance (horizontal component) at the time of engagement is stable. When the drill according to the related art engages a workpiece, the engagement point moves toward the outer side and an inward (direction from the outer periphery to the center) horizontal force component applied to the engagement section varies. This leads to a disturbance in the cutting balance. In contrast, according to the drill of the present invention, the outer-end corner of the indexable insert at the outermost position engages the workpiece first. Therefore, variation in the horizontal force component which occurs when the drill engages the workpiece can be reduced and the processing stability can be maintained.
In addition, in a process of forming a through hole, the outer end of the peripheral cutting edge exits first. Therefore, the tendency that the exit hole diameter is reduced can be reduced and the accuracy of the exit hole diameter can be improved. In addition, generation of return marks and burrs can be suppressed.
In the case where the center cutting edge is formed of the first indexable insert, the peripheral cutting edge is formed of the second indexable insert, and the ratio of the cutting contribution A of the center cutting edge to the cutting contribution B of the peripheral cutting edge is set in the range of A:B=52:48 to 55:45, the thrust and the horizontal force component applied in the cutting process can be reduced. Therefore, the stability of the cutting process can be particularly increased.
In addition, in the case where the center cutting edge is formed of a ridgeline at a long side of one of the parallelogram-shaped inserts with the same specification and the peripheral cutting edge is formed of a ridgeline at a short side of the other one of the parallelogram-shaped inserts, the number of kinds of the indexable inserts being used can be reduced and an economic effect can be obtained accordingly.
The helical flutes provided in the outer periphery of the drill main body may be formed so as to extend about ¼ turn around the drill main body, and a rise-start point of each flute at a terminating end thereof may be at a position separated from the peripheral cutting edge by 85° to 95° in the circumferential direction. In such a case, in a front view of the drill, terminating ends of lands of the drill main body are on both sides relative to the direction in which the horizontal force component is applied in the hole-forming process, and portions of the drill main body are disposed at those positions. Therefore, the base end section of the drill main body has enough strength to endure the horizontal force component and vibration of the drill main body due to the horizontal force component can be suppressed.
In addition, according to a method for arranging inserts of the present invention, even when the drill diameter is changed, the ratio between the cutting contributions of the center cutting edge and the peripheral cutting edge is maintained equal to the ratio set before the drill diameter is changed. Therefore, variation in performance due to variation in the ratio between the cutting contributions can be prevented and stable cutting performance can be obtained even after the drill diameter is changed. Therefore, variation in the accuracy of the holes can be suppressed.
In
In
In
Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to
The drill main body 1 includes two chip discharge flutes 2 at the outer periphery thereof, and insert seats 3 and 3 are provided at the end of the drill main body at positions separated from each other by half turn in the circumferential direction of the drill. The flutes 2 may be straight flutes. However, in the drill described as an example, helical flutes are formed. In addition, the insert seats 3 and 3 are provided at positions where distances from a rotational center O differ from each other.
The indexable inserts 5-1 and 5-2 are parallelogram-shaped inserts having clamp holes 6 at the center, and have the same specification (the same shape and the same size). The two indexable inserts 5-1 and 5-2 are attached to the insert seats 3 and 3 provided at the end of the drill main body 1, and are fixed to the drill main body 1 with the clamp screws 7.
One indexable insert (first indexable insert) 5-1 is disposed at the center of the drill main body 1 so as to extend beyond the rotational center O. A ridgeline at a long side of the insert 5-1 including an obtuse-angled corner of the insert 5-1 forms a center cutting edge 8 of the drill. The other indexable insert (second indexable insert) 5-2 is disposed at the outer periphery of the drill main body 1. A ridgeline at a short side of the insert 5-2 including an acute-angled corner of the insert 5-2 forms a peripheral cutting edge 9 of the drill.
As shown in
Referring to
The drill diameter is changed by changing the positional relationship between the indexable inserts 5-1 and 5-2 forming the center cutting edge 8 and the peripheral cutting edge 9 from the relationship shown in
The two indexable inserts 5-1 and 5-2 whose arrangement positions are changed are attached to a drill main body (which is different from the drill main body used before the drill diameter is changed), and thus a drill having a different outer diameter is obtained. The thus-obtained drill is set such that the ratio between the cutting contribution A of the center cutting edge and the cutting contribution B of the peripheral cutting edge is equal to that before the drill diameter is changed. Therefore, variation in the cutting performances due to variation in the ratio between the cutting contributions does not occur.
As shown in
In the drill 10 shown as an example, the chip discharge flutes 2 (helical flutes) are formed so as to extend about ¼ turn around the drill main body 1. In
In the drill 10 shown as an example, an inclination angle θ (see
In addition, although a concave angle γ1 of the center cutting edge 8 in the radial direction is set to −5° and a concave angle γ2 of the peripheral cutting edge 9 in the radial direction is set to +5°, the concave angles in the radial direction can be arbitrarily changed as long as the cutting quality and the endurance of the inserts are not affected.
In addition, it is not necessary that the center cutting edge 8 extend along a straight line, and the center cutting edge 8 may, for example, also be curved such that an intermediate section thereof in the radial direction projects forward in the axial direction.
In addition, in the drill according to the present invention, as long as there is no problem of space, three or more indexable inserts may also be combined together to form cutting edges.
To confirm the effects obtained by maintaining the ratio of the cutting contribution A of the center cutting edge and the cutting contribution B of the peripheral cutting edge 9 in the range of A:B=52:48 to 55:45 when the drill diameter is changed, the following experiment was performed using three types of drills (all of which have the shape shown in
The experiment was performed using samples I to III. The ratio of the cutting contribution of the center cutting edge relative to that of the peripheral cutting edge was 50% in sample I, 52.5% in sample II, and 55.0% in sample III. Holes were formed under the conditions given below, and the thrust and the horizontal force component applied in the hole-forming process were measured with a Kistler dynamometer. In addition, the drill diameter and the entrance hole diameter, the intermediate hole diameter (diameter at the intermediate position in the depth direction), and the exit hole diameter of the holes formed with different feed rates were measured.
-Cutting Conditions-
Material of workpiece: S50C
Cutting velocity: V=175 m/min
Feed rate: f=0.08 mm/rev and f=0.15 mm/rev
Wet cutting
The results of the experiment are shown in
As is clear from the data shown in
An experiment was performed in which holes were formed under the conditions given below using a drill with a diameter D=20 mm having the shape shown in
-Cutting Conditions-
Material of workpiece: SCM415
Cutting velocity: V=130 m/min
Feed rate: f=0.10 mm/rev
Hole depth: d=50 mm (through hole)
Wet cutting
In addition, variations in the entrance hole diameter, the intermediate hole diameter, and the exit hole diameter relative to the measured drill diameter obtained when the feed rate was changed between f=0.10 mm/rev and f=0.15 mm/rev (other conditions are not changed) were observed. The result is shown in
Through holes were formed using the drill of the present invention and the comparative drill used in Example 2 under the conditions given below, and burrs generated at the exit side (side at which the drill exits the workpiece) of the holes were observed.
-Cutting Conditions-
Material of workpiece: SUS304
The result is explained below.
When the feed rate was f=0.10 mm/rev, the height (s1 in
When the feed rate was f=0.15 mm/rev, the height of burrs generated was 0.95 mm at a maximum when the drill of the present invention was used, and was 1.20 mm at a maximum a comparative drill was used.
It is clear from the above-described experiment result that generation of burrs can be suppressed by the drill of the present invention in which the outer peripheral section of the cutting edge exits the workpiece first.
A performance evaluation test was performed for drills in which chip discharge flutes are formed as helical flutes in the outer periphery of the drill main body so as to extend about ¼ turn around the drill main body and in which a rise-start point of each helical flute at a terminating end thereof is at a position separated from the peripheral cutting edge by 85° to 95° in the circumferential direction. The evaluation test was performed using evaluation drills (drill diameter D=φ20.0 mm, L/D=4) having the shapes of types 1 to 5 shown in
In the experiment, an irregular-shaped hole forming process {process of forming a shaded section of an irregular-shaped hole shown in
In the irregular-shaped hole forming process, the processing conditions were as follows. That is, the workpiece was S50C, the cutting velocity was V=130 m/min, the feed rate was f=0.10 mm/rev, and the cutting process was wet cutting. The processing conditions for the oblique engagement process were the same as those for the process of forming the irregular-shaped holes.
In the irregular-shaped hole forming process, rubbing marks were formed over the entire area of the surfaces processed by the drills of types 4 and 5, and return marks were also formed in the processed surfaces. The reason for this is presumably that the drill main bodies had small rigidities and were deflected in the cutting process. With regard to the drill of type 1, although no rubbing marks were formed, return marks were formed. The reason for this is also presumably that the drill was deflected in the cutting process. With regard to the drills of types 2 and 3, although slight chatter marks and rubbing marks were observed, it can be said that the processed surfaces had satisfactory characteristics as a whole.
In the oblique-engagement process, rubbing marks were formed over the entire area of the surfaces processed by the drills of types 1, 2, 4, and 5, and return marks were also formed in the processed surfaces. The reason for this is presumably that the drill main bodies had small rigidities and were deflected in the cutting process. With regard to the drill of type 3, although slight rubbing marks were observed, it can be said that the processed surfaces had satisfactory characteristics as a whole.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-347335 | Dec 2006 | JP | national |
| 2007-098150 | Apr 2007 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2007/074700 | 12/21/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/19/2009 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2008/078696 | 7/3/2008 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4220429 | Powers et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4644669 | Greco | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4844643 | Icks | Jul 1989 | A |
| 5509761 | Grossman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5890853 | Hiranaka | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6030155 | Scheer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6929432 | Roman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6948891 | Roman | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7201542 | Fritsch et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7237985 | Leuze et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 20050260049 | Kruszynski et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1203841 | Jan 1999 | CN |
| 0 066 079 | Dec 1982 | EP |
| 0 549 548 | May 2003 | EP |
| 54-116795 | Mar 1978 | JP |
| 54116795 | Sep 1979 | JP |
| 58-126113 | Aug 1983 | JP |
| 2704917 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 1029108 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| 11235606 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 2000202703 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Extended European Search Report for corresponding EP Application No. 07851052.6-1262, dated Dec. 20, 2010, pp. 1-6. |
| Israeli Office Action for Israeli Patent Application No. 199432 dated Jan. 29, 2012, pp. 1-6. |
| Chinese Office Action for corresponding CN Application No. 200780045126.9, dated Apr. 7, 2010, pp. 1-15 China. |
| Office Action for the corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-098150, dated Nov. 29, 2011 with partial English translation, pp. 1-5. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100034606 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |
