Indirect printing system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11660857
  • Patent Number
    11,660,857
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 15, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 30, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
An indirect printing system is disclosed having an intermediate transfer member (ITM) in the form of an endless belt that circulates during operation to transport ink images from an image forming station. Ink images are deposited on an outer surface of the ITM by one or a plurality of print bars. At an impression station, the ink images are transferred from the outer surface of the ITM onto a printing substrate. In some embodiments, the outer surface of the ITM 20 is maintained within the image forming station at a predetermined distance from the one or each of the print bars 10, 12, 14 and 16 by means of a plurality of support rollers 11, 13, 15, 17 that have a common flat tangential plane and contact the inner surface of the ITM. In some embodiments, the inner surface of the ITM is attracted to the support rollers, the attraction being such that the area of contact between the ITM and each support roller is greater on the downstream side than the upstream side of the support roller, referenced to the direction of movement of the ITM.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to an indirect printing system having an intermediate transfer member (ITM) in the form of an endless belt for transporting ink images from an image forming station, where the ink images are deposited on an outer surface of the ITM by at least one print bar, to an impression station where the ink images are transferred from the outer surface of the ITM onto a printing substrate.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

An example of a digital printing system as set out above is described in detail in WO 2013/132418 which discloses use of a water-based ink and an ITM having a hydrophobic outer surface.


In indirect printing systems, it is common to wrap the ITM around a support cylinder or drum and such mounting ensures that, at the image forming station, the distance of the ITM from the print bars does not vary. Where, however, the ITM is a driven flexible endless belt passing over drive rollers and tensioning rollers, it is useful to take steps to ensure that the ITM does not flap up and down, or is otherwise displaced, as it passes through the image forming station and that its distance from the print bars remains fixed.


In WO 2013/132418, the ITM is supported in the image forming station on a flat table and it is proposed to use negative air pressure and lateral belt tensioning to maintain the ITM in contact with its support surface. In some systems, employing such construction may create a high level of drag on the ITM as it passes through the image forming station.


In WO 2013/132418, it is also taught that to assist in guiding the belt smoothly, friction may be reduced by passing the belt over rollers adjacent each print bar instead of sliding the belt over stationary guide plates. The rollers need not be precisely aligned with their respective print bars. They may be located slightly (e.g. few millimeters) downstream of the print head jetting location. Frictional forces are used to maintain the belt taut and substantially parallel to print bars. To achieve this, the underside of the belt has high frictional properties and the lateral tension is applied by the guide channels sufficiently to maintain the belt flat and in contact with rollers as it passes beneath the print bars.


Some systems rely on lateral tension to maintain the belt in frictional engagement with the rollers to prevent the belt from lifting off the rollers at any point across. Nevertheless, in some systems, this may increase (even severely) the drag on the belt and wear of the guide channels.


SUMMARY

By supporting the ITM during its passage through the image forming station without severely increasing the drag on the ITM, it is possible to avoid flapping of the ITM, thereby maintaining its surface at a fixed predetermined distance from the print bars. This may be accomplished by a plurality of support rollers that have a common flat tangential plane and contact the inner surface of the ITM.


According to embodiments of the present invention, there is provided an indirect printing system having an intermediate transfer member (ITM) in the form of a circulating endless belt for transporting ink images from an image forming station, where the ink images are deposited on an outer surface of the ITM by at least one print bar, to an impression station where the ink images are transferred from the outer surface of the ITM onto a printing substrate, wherein the outer surface of the ITM is maintained within the image forming station at a predetermined distance from the at least one print bar by means of a plurality of support rollers that have a common flat tangential plane and contact the inner surface of the ITM, and wherein the inner surface of the ITM is attracted to the support rollers, the attraction being such that the area of contact between the ITM and each support roller is greater on the downstream side than the upstream side of the support roller, referenced to the direction of movement of the ITM. The attraction of the ITM to each support roller is sufficient to cause the section of the ITM disposed immediately downstream of the support roller to be deflected downwards, away from the common tangential plane of the support rollers.


In some embodiments of the invention, the inner surface of the ITM and the outer surface of each support roller are formed of materials that tackily adhere to one another, adhesion between the outer surface of each support roller and the inner surface of the ITM serving to prevent the ITM from separating from the support rollers, during operation, when the belt circulates.


The support rollers may have smooth or rough outer surfaces and the inner surface of the ITM may be formed of, or coated with, a material that tackily adheres to the surfaces of the support rollers.


The material on the inner surface of the ITM may be a tacky silicone-based material, which may be optionally supplemented with filler particles to improve its mechanical properties.


In some embodiments of the invention, the attraction between the inner surface of the ITM and the support rollers may be caused by suction. Each support roller may have a perforated outer surface, communicating with a plenum within the support roller that is connected to a vacuum source, so that negative pressure attracts the inner surface of the ITM to the rollers. A stationary shield may surround, or line, part of the circumference of each support roller so that suction is only applied to the side of the roller facing the ITM.


In some embodiments of the invention, the attraction between the support rollers and the ITM may be magnetic. In such embodiments, the inner surface of the ITM may be rendered magnetic (in the same way as fridge magnets) so as to be attracted to ferromagnetic support rollers. Alternatively, the inner surface of the ITM may be loaded with ferromagnetic particles so as to be attracted to magnetized support rollers.


Each print bar may be associated with a respective support roller and the position of the support roller in relation to the print bar may be such that, during operation, ink is deposited by the print bar onto the ITM along a narrow strip upstream from the contact area between the ITM and the support roller.


A shaft or linear encoder may be associated with one or more of the support rollers, to determine the position of the ITM in relation to the print bars.


According to some embodiments, each print bar is associated with a respective support roller and the position of the associated support roller in relation to the print bar is such that, during operation, ink is deposited by the print bar onto the ITM along a narrow strip upstream from the contact area between the ITM and the support roller.


According to some embodiments a shaft or linear encoder is associated with one or more of the support rollers to determine the position of the ITM in relation to the print bars.


According to some embodiments, the indirect printing system comprises a plurality of the print bars such that a different respective support roller is located below and vertically aligned with each print bar of the plurality of print bars.


According to some embodiments, for each given print bar of the plurality of print bars, a respective vertically-aligned support roller is disposed slightly downstream of the given print bar.


According to some embodiments, each given support roller of the plurality of support rollers is associated with a respective rotational-velocity measurement device and/or a respective encoder for measuring a respective rotational-velocity of the given support roller.


An indirect printing system having an intermediate transfer member (ITM) in the form of a circulating endless belt for transporting ink images from an image forming station is now disclosed. According to embodiments of the invention, the ink images are deposited on an outer surface of the ITM by at a plurality of print bars, to an impression station where the ink images are transferred from the outer surface of the ITM onto a printing substrate, wherein the outer surface of the ITM is maintained within the image forming station at a predetermined vertical distance from the print bars by a plurality of support rollers that have a common flat tangential plane and contact the inner surface of the ITM, the support rollers being disclosed such that a different respective support roller is located below and vertically aligned with each print bar of the plurality of print bars, wherein each given support roller of the plurality of support rollers is associated with a respective rotational-velocity measurement device and/or a respective encoder for measuring a respective rotational-velocity of the given support roller.


According to some embodiments, for each given print bar of the plurality of print bars, a respective vertically-aligned support roller is disposed slightly downstream of the given print bar.


According to some embodiments, the indirect printing system further comprises:


droplet-deposition control circuitry configured to regulate, for each given print bar of the plurality of print bars, a respective rate of ink droplet deposition DR onto the ITM, the droplet-deposition control circuitry regulating the ink droplet deposition rates in accordance with and in response to the measured of the rotational velocity of a respective support rollers that is vertically aligned with the given print bar.


In some embodiments, the measurement device and/or the encoder is attached (i.e. directly or indirectly attached) to its respective roller (e.g. via a shaft thereof).


According to some embodiments, for upstream and downstream print bars respectively vertically aligned with upstream and downstream support rollers, the droplet-deposition control circuit regulates the respective DRUPSTREAM, DRDOWNSTREAM deposition rates at upstream and downstream print bars so that a difference DRUPSTREAM-DRDOWNSTREAM between respective ink-droplet-deposition-rates at upstream and downstream print bars is regulated according to a difference function between function F=ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM where: i. ωUPSTREAM is the measured rotation rate of the upstream-printbar-aligned support roller as measured by its associated rotational-velocity measurement device or encoder; ii. RUPSTREAM is the radius of the upstream-printbar-aligned support roller; iii. ωDOWNSTREAM is the measured rotation rate of the downstream-printbar-aligned support roller as measured by its associated rotational-velocity measurement device or encoder; and ii. RDOWNSTREAM is the radius of the upstream-printbar-aligned support roller.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The invention will now be described further, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIGS. 1, 3 and 4 each schematically illustrate an image transfer member passing beneath four print bars of an image forming station; and



FIG. 2 is a section through an embodiment in which the ITM is attracted to a support roller by application of negative pressure from within the support roller.



FIG. 5 shows converting a digital input image into an ink image by printing.



FIGS. 6-8 shows methods for printing by an upstream and a downstream print bar in accordance with angular velocities of support rollers.





It will be appreciated that the drawings area only intended to explain the principles employed in the present invention and illustrated components may not be drawn to scale.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 shows an image transfer member (ITM) 20 passing beneath four print bars 10, 12, 14, 16 of an image forming station of a digital printing system, for example of the kind described in WO 2013/132418. The print bars 10, 12, 14, 16 deposit ink droplets onto the ITM which are dried while being transported by the ITM and are transferred to a substrate at an impression station (not shown). The direction of movement of the ITM from the image forming station to the impression station, illustrated by arrow 24 in the drawing, is also termed the printing direction. The terms upstream and downstream are used herein to indicate the relative position of elements with reference to such printing direction.


Multiple print bars can be used either for printing in multiple colors, for example CMYK in the case of the four print bars shown in the drawing, or to increase printing speed when printing in the same color. In either case, accurate registration is required between the ink droplets deposited by different print bars and for this to be achieved it is necessary to ensure that the ITM lie in a well defined plane when ink is being deposited onto its surface.


In the illustrated embodiment, cylindrical support rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17 are positioned immediately downstream of the respective bars 10, 12, 14 and 16. A common horizontal plane, spaced form the print bars by a desired predetermined distance, is tangential to all the support rollers. The rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17 contact the underside of the ITM 20, that is to say the side facing away from the print bars.


To ensure that the ITM 20 does not flap as it passes over the rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17, the rollers in FIG. 1 may have smoothly polished surfaces and the underside of the ITM may be formed of, or coated with, a soft conformable silicone-based material that tackily adheres to smooth surfaces. Such materials are well known and are in a wide commercial use, for example, in children's toys. There are for example figures made of such materials that will adhere to a vertical glass pane when pressed against it.


Because of the tacky contact between the ITM 20 and the roller 11, 13, 15 and 17, it will be seen in the drawing that the ITM is deflected downwards from the notional horizontal tangential plane on the downstream or exit side of each roller 11, 13, 15 and 17. Thus, the contact area 22 between the ITM 20 and each roller 11, 13, 15 and 17, lies predominantly on the downstream, or exit, side of the roller. The tension applied to the ITM in the printing direction ensures that the ITM returns to the desired plane before it reaches the subsequent print bar 10, 12, or 14.


The sticking of the ITM 20 to the support rollers is relied upon to ensure that the ITM does not lift off the rollers. As the rollers are supported on bearings and are free to rotate smoothly, the only drag on the ITM, other than the force required to overcome the resistance of the bearing and maintain the momentum of the support rollers, is the small force required to separate the tacky underside of the ITM from each of the support rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17.


The regions of the ITM in contact with the uppermost points on each roller 11, 13, 15 and 17 and the regions immediately upstream of each roller lie in the nominal tangential plane and can be aligned with the print bars 10, 12, 14 and 16. However, if any foreign body, such as a dirt particle, should adhere to the tacky underside of the ITM 20 it will cause the upper surface of the ITM to bulge upwards as it passes over a support roller. For this reason, it is preferred to position the print bars 10, 12, 14 and 16 upstream of the vertical axial plane of the rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17, that is to say offset upstream from regions of the ITM in contact with the rollers.


If the tacky adhesion between the ITM 20 and the support rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17 is excessive, it can result in drag and wear of the ITM 20. It is possible to moderate the degree of drag by suitable selection of the hardness of the tacky material or by modification of the roughness of the support rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17.


The attraction in FIG. 1 between the ITM 20 and the support rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17 may rely on magnetism instead of tackiness. In such embodiments, the inner surface of the ITM 20 may be rendered magnetic so as to be attracted to ferromagnetic support rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17. Alternatively, the inner surface of the ITM 20 may be loaded with ferromagnetic particles so as to be attracted to magnetized support rollers 11, 13, 15 and 17.



FIG. 2 shows schematically a further alternative embodiment in which the attraction between the inner surface of the ITM 120 and a support roller assembly generally designated 111 is the result of negative pressure applied through the support roller assembly 111 to the inner surface of the ITM 120 while the outer surface of the ITM 120 is under atmospheric pressure.


The illustrated support roller assembly 111 comprises a support roller 111a surrounded around a major part of its circumference by a stationary shield 111b. The roller 111a has a perforated surface and is hollow, its inner plenum 111c being connected to a vacuum source. The function of the shield 111b is to prevent the vacuum in the support roller 111a from being dissipated and to concentrate all the suction in the arc of the support roller 111a adjacent to and facing the inner surface of the ITM 120. Seals may be provided between the support roller 111a and the shield 111b to prevent air from entering into the plenum 111c through other than the exposed arc of the support roller 111a.


As an alternative to a shield 111b surrounding the outside of the support roller 111a, it would be possible to provide a stationary shield lining the interior of the support roller 111a.



FIG. 3 illustrates the same system illustrated in FIG. 1 comprising print bars 10, 12, 14 and 16 respectively having (i) centers whose positions are labelled as PB_LocA, PB_LocB, PB_LocC, and PB_LocD. where PB is an abbreviation for “Print Bar” and Loc is an abbreviation for “Locations”; and (ii) thicknesses that are labelled as THKNSA, THKNSB, THKNSC, and THKNSD. The distances between neighboring print bars are labelled as DistanceAB, DistanceBC, and DistanceCD.


The ‘center’ of a print bar is a vertical plane oriented in the cross-print direction.


In some embodiments, THKNSA=THKNSB=THKNSC=THKNSD, though this is not a limitation, and in other embodiments there may be a variation in print bar thickness. In some embodiments, the print bars are evenly spaced so that DistanceAB=DistanceBC=DistanceCD—once again, this is not a limitation and in other embodiments the distances between neighboring print bars may vary.


In some embodiments, each print bar is associated with a respective support roller that is located below the support roller and vertically aligned with the support roller.


For the present disclosure, when a support roller 13 is ‘vertically aligned’ with an associated print bar 12, a center of the support roller 13 may be exactly aligned (i.e. in the print direction illustrated by 24) with the centerline PB_LOCB of the associated print bar 12. Alternatively, if there is a ‘slight’ horizontal displacement/offset in the print direction (e.g. a downstream offset of the support roller relative to its associated print bar) between the center of the support roller 13 and a center of the associated print bar 12, the print bar 12 and support roller 13 are still considered to be ‘vertically aligned’ with each other.



FIG. 3 illustrates horizontal displacements/offsets OffsetA, OffsetB, OffsetC, and OffsetD in the print direction between center of each print bar 10, 12, 14, 16 and its respective support roller 11, 13, 15 and 17. However, because the print bars and the support rollers are ‘vertically aligned’; this displacement/offset is at most ‘slight.’ The term ‘slight’ or ‘slightly displaced/offset’ (used interchangeably) are defined below.


In the non-limiting example, all of the support rollers have a common radius—this is not a limitation, and embodiments where the radii of the support rollers differ are also contemplated.


In one particular example, the radius of each support roller 11, 13, 15, and 17 is 80 mm, the center-center distance (DistanceAB=DistanceBC=DistanceCD) between neighboring pairs of print bars is 364 mm, the thickness (THKNSA=THKNSB=THKNSC=THKNSD) of each print bar is 160 mm, and the offset distances (OffsetA=OffsetB=OffsetC,=OffsetD.) between the center of the print bar and the center of its associated roller is 23 mm.


Print bars 10 and 16 are ‘end print bars’ which each have only a single neighbor—the neighbor of print bar 10 is print bar 12 and the neighbor of print bar 16 is print bar 14. In contrast, print bars 12, 14 are ‘internal print bars’ having two neighbors. Each print bar is associated with a closest neighbor distance—for print bar 10 this is DistanceAB, for print bar 12 this is MIN(DistanceAB, DistanceBC) where MIN denotes the minimum, for print bar 14 this is MIN(DistanceBC, DistanceCD) and for print bar 16 this is DistanceCD.


For the present disclosure, when the support roller is ‘slightly displaced/offset’ from its associated print bar, this means that a ratio α between the (i) the offset/displacement distance “Offset” defined by the centers of the support roller and the print bar and (ii) the closest neighbor distance of the print bar is at most 0.25. In some embodiments, the ratio α is at most 0.2 or at most 0.15 or at most 0.1. In the particular example described above, the ratio α is 23/364=0.06.


In some embodiments, in order to achieve accurate registration between ink droplets deposited by different print bars, it is necessary to monitor and control the position of the ITM not only in the vertical direction but also in the horizontal direction. Because of the adhesive nature of the contact between the rollers and the ITM, the angular position of the rollers can provide an accurate indication of the position of the surface of the ITM in the horizontal direction, and therefore the position of ink droplets deposited by preceding print bars. Shaft encoders may thus suitably be mounted on one or more of the rollers to provide position feedback signals to the controller of the print bars.


In some embodiments, the length of the flexible belt or of portions thereof may fluctuate in time, where the magnitude of the fluctuations may depend upon the physical structure of the flexible belt. In some embodiments, the stretching and contracting of the belt may be non-uniform. In these situations, the local linear velocity of the ITM at each print bar may vary between print bars due to stretching and contracting of the belt or of the ITM in the print direction. Not only may the degree of stretch may be non-uniform along the length of the belt or ITM, but it may temporally fluctuate as well.


Registration accuracy may depend on having an accurate measure of the respective linear velocity of the ITM underneath each print bar. For systems where the ITM is a drum or a flexible belt having temporally constant and spatially uniform stretch (and thus a constant shape), it may be sufficient to measure the ITM speed at a single location.


However, in other systems (e.g. when the ITM stretches and contracts non-uniformly in space and in a manner that fluctuates in time), the linear speed of the ITM under a first print bar 10 at PB_LocA may not match the linear speed under a second print bar 12 at PB_LocB. Thus, if the linear speed of the ITM at the downstream print bar 10 exceeds that of the ITM at the upstream bar 12 this may indicate that the blanket is locally extending (i.e. increasing a local degree of stretch) at locations between the two print bars 10, 12. Conversely, if the linear speed of the ITM at the downstream print bar 10 is less than that of the ITM at the upstream bar 12 this may indicate that the blanket is locally contracting at locations between the two print bars 10, 12.


Registration may thus benefit from obtaining an accurate measurement of the local speed of the ITM at each print bar. Instead of only relying on a single ITM-representative velocity value (i.e. like may be done for a drum), a “print-bar-local” linear velocity of the ITM at each print bar may be measured at a location that is relatively ‘close’ to the print bar center PB_LOC.


For example, as shown in FIG. 4, a respective device (e.g. for example, a shaft-encoder) 211, 213, 215 or 217 may be used to measure the respective rotational velocity co of each support roller—this rotational velocity, together with the radius of the support roller, may describe the local linear velocity of each support roller. Because the support roller is vertically aligned with the print bar, this rotational velocity, together with the radius of the support roller, may provide a relatively accurate measurement of the linear velocity of the ITM beneath the print bar.



FIG. 4 illustrates the rotational-velocity measuring device schematically. As is known in the art (e.g. art of shaft encoders), the rotational-velocity measuring device 211, 213, 215 or 217 may including mechanical and/or electrical and/or optical and/or magnetic or any other components to monitor the rotation of the support roller. For example, the rotational-velocity measuring device 211, 213, 215 or 217 may directly monitor rotation of the roller or of a rigid object (e.g. a shaft) that is rigidly attached to the roller and that rotates in tandem therewith.


Because the ITM may be locally stretch or contract over time, depositing ink-droplets only according to a single ‘ITM-representative’ speed for all print bars may lead to registration errors. Instead, it may be advantageous to locally measure the linear speed of the ITM at each print bar.


Towards this end, the support rollers may serve multiple purposes—i.e. supporting the ITM in a common tangential plane and measuring the speed of the ITM at a location where the ITM is in contact with (e.g, no-slip contact—for example, due the inner surface being attached to the support rollers—for example, due to the presence of a tacky material on the ITM inner surface) with the support roller.


In order for the support roller to provide an accurate measurement of the linear speed of the ITM beneath the print bar, it is desirable to vertically align the support roller with its associated print bar. Towards this end, it is desirable to locate the support roller so the value of the ratio α (defined above) is relatively small.


In some embodiments, a ratio β between (i) the offset/displacement distance “Offset” defined by the centers of the support roller and the print bar and (ii) a thickness TKNS of the print bar is at most 1 or at most 0.75 or at most 0.5 or at most 0.4 or at most 0.3 or at most 0.2. In the example described above, a value of the ratio β is 23 mm/160 mm=0.14.


In some embodiments, a ratio γ between (i) a diameter of the vertically aligned support roller and (ii) a thickness TKNS of the print bar is at most 2 or at most 1.5 or at most 1.25. In the example described above, a value of the ratio β is 160 mm/160 mm=1.


In some embodiments, a ratio g between (i) a diameter of the vertically aligned support roller and (ii) the closest neighbor distance of the associated print bar at most 1 or at most 0.75 or at most 0.6 or at most 0.5. In the example described above, a value of the ratio β is 160 mm/364 mm=0.44.



FIG. 5 is a generic figure illustrating any printing process—a digital input image is stored in electronic or computer memory (e.g. as a two-dimensional array of gray-scale values) and this ‘digital input image’ is printed by the printing system to yield an ink image on the ITM.


Each print bar deposits droplets of ink upon the ITM at a respective deposition-rate that depends upon (i) content of the digital input image being printed and (ii) the speed of the ITM as it moves beneath the print bar. The ‘deposition rate’ is the rate at which ink droplets are deposited on the ITM 20 and has the dimensions of ‘number of droplets per unit time’ (e.g. droplets per second).



FIG. 6 illustrates a method of operating upstream 14 and downstream 12 print bars according to some embodiments. In step S205, an angular velocity ωUPSTREAM of support roller 15 is monitored; similarly (e.g. simultaneously), in step S215, an angular velocity ωDOWNSTREAM of support roller 13 is monitored. In step S251, droplets of ink are deposited on the ITM 20 by upstream print bar 14 at a rate determined (e.g. determined primarily) by the combination of (i) the digital input image; and (ii) ωUPSTREAM. In step S255, droplets of ink are deposited on the ITM 20 by downstream print bar 12 at a rate determined (e.g. determined primarily) by the combination of (i) the digital input image; and (ii) ωDOWNSTREAM.


It is understood that due to temporal fluctuations in non-uniform stretching of the ITM, the linear velocities of the ITM at the upstream 14 and downstream 12 print bars will not always match. These linear velocities may be approximately and respectively monitored by monitoring the linear velocities (i) at the contact location between upstream support roller 15 (i.e. vertically aligned with the upstream 14 print bar) and (ii) at the contact location between downstream support roller 13 (i.e. vertically aligned with the downstream 12 print bar).


Notation—the angular velocity of the upstream support roller 15 is ωUPSTREAM, the angular velocity of the downstream support roller 13 is ωDOWNSTREAM, the linear velocity of the ITM 20 at the contact location between the ITM 20 and the upstream support roller 15 is denoted at LVUPSTREAM; the linear velocity of the ITM 20 at the contact location between the ITM 20 and the upstream support roller 15 is denoted at LVUPSTREAM. An ink-droplet deposition rate of the upstream 14 print bar is denoted as DRUPSTREAM and an ink-droplet deposition rate of the downstream 12 print bar is denoted as DRDOWNSTREAM. RUPSTREAM is the radius of the upstream support roller 15; RDOWNSTREAM is the radius of the downstream support roller 13.


In some embodiments, a rate of ink droplet deposition DR at any of the print bars is regulated by electronic circuitry (e.g. control circuitry). For the present disclosure, the term ‘electronic circuitry’ (or control circuitry such as droplet-deposition control circuitry) is intended broadly to include any combination of analog circuitry, digital circuitry (e.g. a digital computer) and software.


For example, the electronic circuitry may regulate the ink droplet deposition rate DR according to and in response to electrical input received directly or indirectly (e.g. after processing) from any rotation-velocity measuring device (e.g. shaft-encoder 211, 213, 215 or 217).


For the present paragraph, assume that LVUPSTREAM is equal to the linear velocity of the ITM directly beneath the upstream print bar 14 and that LVDOWNSTREAM is equal to the linear velocity of the ITM directly beneath the downstream print bar 12—this is a good approximation since (i) any horizontal displacement/offset between the upstream print bar 14 and its associated support roller 15 is at most slight; and (ii) any horizontal displacement/offset between the downstream print bar 12 and its associated support roller 13 is at most slight.


When the upstream and downstream linear velocities match (i.e. when LVUPSTREAM=LVDOWNSTREAM), the difference (DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM) in respective ink-droplet rates at any given time will be determined primarily by (e.g. solely by) the content of the digital input image. Thus, when printing a uniform input image, when the upstream and downstream linear velocities match, this difference (DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM) will be zero and each print bar will deposit ink droplets at a common deposition rate difference DRUPSTREAM=DRDOWNSTREAM.


However, due to temporal fluctuations in the non-uniform stretch of the ITM, there may be periods of mismatch between the upstream and downstream linear velocities match—i.e. when LVUPSTREAM≠LVDOWNSTREAM. In order to compensate (e.g. for example, when printing a uniform input-image or a uniform portion of a larger input-image), the greater the difference between the upstream and downstream linear velocities, the greater the difference in ink deposition rates—i.e. as the linear velocity difference LVUPSTREAM−LVDOWNSTREAM increases (decreases), the deposition rate difference DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM increases (decreases).


Assuming no-slip between the ITM 20 and the upstream support roller 15, the magnitude of LVUPSTREAM is the product ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM. Assuming no-slip between the ITM 20 and the downstream support roller 13, the magnitude of LVDOWNSTREAM is the product ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM. The linear velocity difference LVUPSTREAM−LVDOWNSTREAM is given by ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM.


Therefore, in some embodiments the respective ink droplet depositions rates at the upstream 14 and downstream 12 print bar may regulated so that, for at least some digital input images (e.g. uniform images) the difference therebetween in ink droplet deposition rates DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM increases (decreases) as ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM (decreases) increases.


This is illustrated in FIG. 7 where (i) steps S205 and S215 are as in FIG. 6 and (ii) in step S271 droplets are deposited onto ITM 20, by the upstream 14 onto and downstream 12 print bars so that a difference in ink droplet deposition rates DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM is regulated according to ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM. In one example (e.g. when printing uniform digital input images or uniform portions of a non-uniform digital image), the difference in ink droplet deposition rates DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM in proportion with ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM. In this example, whenever ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM increases (decreases), DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM increases (decreases).



FIG. 8 is another method for depositing ink droplets on ITM 20 where steps S205 and S215 are as in FIGS. 6-7. In steps S201 and S211, droplets are deposited (i.e. at respective deposition rates DRUPSTREAM, DRDOWNSTREAM) by the upstream 14 and downstream 12 print bars. In steps S221-S225, in response to an increase in ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM, DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM increases. In steps S229 and S235, in response to a decrease in ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM, DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM decreases.


According to some embodiments, for upstream 14 and downstream 12 print bars respectively vertically aligned with upstream 15 and downstream 13 support rollers, the droplet-deposition control circuit regulates the respective DRUPSTREAM, DRDOWNSTREAM deposition rates at upstream and downstream print bars so that a difference DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM between respective ink-droplet-deposition-rates at upstream and downstream print bars is regulated according to a difference function between function F=ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM where: i. ωUPSTREAM is the measured rotation rate of the upstream-printbar-aligned support roller 13 as measured by its associated rotational-velocity measurement device or encoder 213; ii. RUPSTREAM is the radius of the upstream-printbar-aligned support roller 215; iii. ωDOWNSTREAM is the measured rotation rate of the downstream-printbar-aligned support roller 15 as measured by its associated rotational-velocity measurement device or encoder 215; and ii. RDOWNSTREAM is the radius of the upstream-printbar-aligned support roller 15.


Embodiments of the present invention relate to encoder devices and/or rotational-velocity measurement devices. The rotational-velocity measurement device and/or encoder device may convert the angular position or motion of a shaft or axle to an analog or digital code. The encoder may be an absolute or an incremental (relative) encoder. The encoder may include any combination of mechanical (e.g. including gear(s)) (e.g. stress-based and/or rheometer-based) and/or electrical (e.g. conductive or capacitive) and/or optical and/or magnetic (e.g. on-axis or off-axis—e.g. including a Hall-effect sensor or magnetoresistive sensor) techniques, or any other technique known in the art.


In different embodiments, the measurement device and/or the encoder may be attached (i.e. directly or indirectly attached) to its respective roller.


It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination or as suitable in any other described embodiment of the invention. Certain features described in the context of various embodiments are not to be considered essential features of those embodiments, unless the embodiment is inoperative without those elements.


Presently-disclosed teachings may be practiced in a system that employs water-based ink and an ITM having a hydrophobic outer surface. However, this is not a limitation and other inks or ITMs may be used.


Although the present invention has been described with respect to various specific embodiments presented thereof for the sake of illustration only, such specifically disclosed embodiments should not be considered limiting. Many other alternatives, modifications and variations of such embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art based upon Applicant's disclosure herein. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations and to be bound only by the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims and any change which come within their meaning and range of equivalency.


In the description and claims of the present disclosure, each of the verbs “comprise”, “include” and “have”, and conjugates thereof, are used to indicate that the object or objects of the verb are not necessarily a complete listing of features, members, steps, components, elements or parts of the subject or subjects of the verb.


As used herein, the singular form “a”, “an” and “the” include plural references and mean “at least one” or “one or more” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.


As used herein, when a numerical value is preceded by the term “about”, the term “about” is intended to indicate +/−10%.


To the extent necessary to understand or complete the disclosure of the present invention, all publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned herein, are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety as is fully set forth herein.


Citation or identification of any reference in this application shall not be construed as an admission that such reference is available as prior art to the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An indirect printing system having an intermediate transfer member (ITM) in the form of a circulating endless belt for transporting ink images from an image forming station, where the ink images are deposited on an outer surface of the ITM by at a plurality of print bars, to an impression station where the ink images are transferred from the outer surface of the ITM onto a printing substrate, wherein the outer surface of the ITM is maintained within the image forming station at a predetermined vertical distance from the print bars by a plurality of support rollers that have a common flat tangential plane and contact the inner surface of the ITM, the support rollers being disposed such that a different respective support roller is both (i) located below and (ii) vertically aligned with each print bar of the plurality of print bars, wherein each given support roller of the plurality of support rollers is associated with a respective rotational-velocity measurement device and/or a respective encoder for measuring a respective rotational-velocity of the given support roller wherein at least one condition selected from the group consisting of a first condition, a second condition, and a third condition is true, and wherein: I. according to the first condition, for each given print bar of the plurality of print bars, a respective vertically-aligned support roller is disposed slightly downstream of the given print bar;II. according to the second condition, the system further comprises: droplet-deposition control circuitry configured to regulate, for each given print bar of the plurality of print bars, a respective rate of ink droplet deposition DR onto the ITM, the droplet-deposition control circuitry regulating the ink droplet deposition rates in accordance with and in response to the measured of the rotational velocity of a respective support rollers that is vertically aligned with the given print bar; andIII. according to the third condition, for upstream and downstream print bars respectively vertically aligned with upstream and downstream support rollers, the droplet-deposition control circuit regulates respective deposit rates DRUPSTREAM, DRDOWNSTREAM deposition rates at upstream and downstream print bars so that a difference DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM between respective ink-droplet-deposition-rates at upstream and downstream print bars is regulated according to a difference function between function F=ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM where: i. ωUPSTREAM is the measured rotation rate of the upstream-printbar-aligned support roller that is measured by its associated rotational-velocity measurement device or encoder; ii. RUPSTREAM is a radius of an upstream roller of the plurality of support rollers; iii. ωDOWNSTREAM is the measured rotation rate of the downstream-printbar-aligned support roller that is measured by its associated rotational-velocity measurement device or encoder; and ii. RDOWNSTREAM is a radius a downstream roller of the plurality of support rollers.
  • 2. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least the first condition is true.
  • 3. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least the second condition is true.
  • 4. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least the third condition is true.
  • 5. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each measurement device and/or the encoder is attached to its respective roller.
  • 6. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each measurement device and/or the encoder directly monitors rotation of its respective associated roller or of a rigid object that is rigidly attached to the roller the respective associated roller and rotates in tandem therewith.
  • 7. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each measurement device and/or the encoder includes at least one motion-tracking sensor selected from the sensor group consisting of: (i) a magnetic sensor; (ii) an optical sensor and (iii) a mechanical sensor, the at least one motion-tracking sensor configured to track angular motion of its respective roller.
  • 8. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the inner surface of the ITM is attracted to the support rollers, the attraction being such that the area of contact between the ITM and each support roller is greater on the downstream side than the upstream side of the support roller, referenced to the direction of movement of the ITM.
  • 9. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 8 wherein the inner surface of the ITM and the outer surface of each support roller are formed of materials that tackily adhere to one another, adhesion between the outer surface of each support roller and the inner surface of the ITM serving to prevent the ITM from separating from the support rollers, during operation, when the belt circulates.
  • 10. The indirect printing system as claimed in claim 9 wherein an inner surface of the ITM is coated with a material that tackily adheres to the surfaces of the support rollers.
  • 11. A method of operating an indirect printing system having an intermediate transfer member (ITM) in the form of a circulating endless belt, the method comprising: at an image forming station of the indirect printing system, depositing ink images on an outer surface of the ITM by at a plurality of print bars;transporting the images from the image forming station to an impression station of the indirect printing system; andat the impression station, transferring the ink images from the outer surface of the ITM onto a printing substrate,wherein the outer surface of the ITM is maintained within the image forming station at a predetermined vertical distance from the print bars by a plurality of support rollers, the support rollers (i) having a common flat tangential plane; (ii) contacting the inner surface of the ITM; and (iii) being disposed such that a different respective support roller is located below and vertically aligned with each print bar of the plurality of print bars, and wherein the method further comprises:for each given support roller of the plurality of support rollers, monitoring a respective rotational velocity of the given support roller by operating at least one monitoring-device selected from the group consisting of: (i) a respective rotational-velocity measurement device that is respectively associated with said each given support roller; and (ii) a respective encoder to measure the respective rotational-velocity of said each given support roller, wherein the method is performed such that at least one condition selected from the group consisting of a first condition, a second condition, and a third condition is true, and wherein: I. according to the first condition, the method further comprises: for each given print bar of the plurality of print bars, a respective vertically-aligned support roller is disposed slightly downstream of the given print bar;II. according to the second condition, the method further comprises: in accordance with and in response to the measured of the rotational velocity of a respective support rollers that is vertically aligned with the given print bar, respectively regulating, for each given print bar of the plurality of print bars, a respective rate of ink droplet deposition DR onto the ITM; andIII. according to the third condition, the method further comprises: for upstream and downstream print bars respectively vertically aligned with upstream and downstream support rollers, regulating respective deposit rates DRUPSTREAM, DRDOWNSTREAM deposition rates at upstream and downstream print bars so that a difference DRUPSTREAM−DRDOWNSTREAM between respective ink-droplet-deposition-rates at upstream and downstream print bars is regulated according to a difference function between function F=ωUPSTREAM*RUPSTREAM−ωDOWNSTREAM*RDOWNSTREAM where: i. ωUPSTREAM is the measured rotation rate of the upstream-printbar-aligned support roller that is measured by its associated rotational-velocity measurement device or encoder; ii. RUPSTREAM is a radius of an upstream roller of the plurality of support rollers; iii. ωDOWNSTREAM is the measured rotation rate of the downstream-printbar-aligned support roller that is measured by its associated rotational-velocity measurement device or encoder; and ii. RDOWNSTREAM is a radius a downstream roller of the plurality of support rollers.
  • 12. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein at least the first condition is true.
  • 13. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein at least the second condition is true.
  • 14. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein at least the third condition is true.
  • 15. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein each measurement device and/or the encoder is attached to its respective roller.
  • 16. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein each measurement device and/or the encoder directly monitors rotation of its respective associated roller or of a rigid object that is rigidly attached to the roller the respective associated roller and rotates in tandem therewith.
  • 17. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein each measurement device and/or the encoder includes at least one motion-tracking sensor selected from the sensor group consisting of: (i) a magnetic sensor; (ii) an optical sensor and (iii) a mechanical sensor, the at least one motion-tracking sensor configured to track angular motion of its respective roller.
  • 18. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the inner surface of the ITM is attracted to the support rollers, the attraction being such that the area of contact between the ITM and each support roller is greater on the downstream side than the upstream side of the support roller, referenced to the direction of movement of the ITM.
  • 19. The method as claimed in claim 18 wherein the inner surface of the ITM and the outer surface of each support roller are formed of materials that tackily adhere to one another, adhesion between the outer surface of each support roller and the inner surface of the ITM serving to prevent the ITM from separating from the support rollers, during operation, when the belt circulates.
  • 20. The method as claimed in claim 19 wherein an inner surface of the ITM is coated with a material that tackily adheres to the surfaces of the support rollers.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1504716 Mar 2015 GB national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/784,208 filed on Feb. 6, 2020 which is incorporated by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/784,208 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/556,324 which is a national stage entry of PCT/IB2016/051560 which was filed on Mar. 20, 2016, which is incorporated by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.

US Referenced Citations (81)
Number Name Date Kind
3935055 Carmien Jan 1976 A
4204471 Becker May 1980 A
4520048 Ranger May 1985 A
4586807 Yuasa May 1986 A
4792473 Vitale Dec 1988 A
4867830 Chung Sep 1989 A
5320214 Kordis Jun 1994 A
5683841 Kato Nov 1997 A
5780412 Scarborough et al. Jul 1998 A
5865299 Williams Feb 1999 A
6318853 Asano et al. Nov 2001 B1
6335046 Mackey Jan 2002 B1
6405006 Tabuchi Jun 2002 B1
6633735 Kellie et al. Oct 2003 B2
9207585 Hatano et al. Dec 2015 B2
9327519 Larson et al. May 2016 B1
10703093 Karlinski et al. Jul 2020 B2
11214089 Landa et al. Jan 2022 B2
11235568 Landa et al. Feb 2022 B2
20010033688 Taylor Oct 2001 A1
20020061451 Kita et al. May 2002 A1
20030041777 Karl et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030103128 Missell et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040177779 Steffen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040221943 Yu et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040249327 Sendijarevic et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040265016 Kitani et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050103437 Carroll May 2005 A1
20050117859 Suzuki et al. Jun 2005 A1
20060066704 Nishida Mar 2006 A1
20060120740 Yamada et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070025740 Katoh et al. Feb 2007 A1
20080066277 Colson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080247780 Hara Oct 2008 A1
20090073222 Hori Mar 2009 A1
20090185204 Wu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100035501 Prudhomme et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100123752 Eun et al. May 2010 A1
20100247171 Ono et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100300604 Goss et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110069110 Matsumoto et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110069117 Ohzeki et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110069129 Shimizu Mar 2011 A1
20110242181 Otobe Oct 2011 A1
20110298884 Furuta Dec 2011 A1
20120014726 Sekihara et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120236100 Toya Sep 2012 A1
20120249630 Bugner et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120314013 Takemoto et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130096871 Takahama Apr 2013 A1
20130182045 Ohzeki et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130229457 Yu Sep 2013 A1
20130235139 Schnabel et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140168313 Ramesh et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140176641 Hawryschuk et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140198162 DiRubio et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150022605 Mantell et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150085038 Liu Mar 2015 A1
20150165758 Sambhy et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150273835 Arimizu et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150315403 Song et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150343797 Song et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150375543 Barnett et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160083609 Sisler et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160378036 Onishi et al. Dec 2016 A1
20180149998 Furukawa May 2018 A1
20190094727 Landa et al. Mar 2019 A1
20210001622 Landa et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210053341 Landa et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210055666 Landa et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210062021 Landa et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210070083 Levanon et al. Mar 2021 A1
20220016880 Landa et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220016881 Shmaiser et al. Jan 2022 A1
20220057732 Landa et al. Feb 2022 A1
20220188050 Boris Jun 2022 A1
20220274394 Chechik et al. Sep 2022 A1
20220288947 Landa et al. Sep 2022 A1
20220339927 Landa et al. Oct 2022 A1
20220379598 Landa et al. Dec 2022 A1
20220388315 Landa et al. Dec 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (51)
Number Date Country
1305895 Aug 2001 CN
1543404 Nov 2004 CN
1703326 Nov 2005 CN
1961015 May 2007 CN
101096455 Jan 2008 CN
101248146 Aug 2008 CN
101433074 May 2009 CN
101592896 Dec 2009 CN
101820241 Sep 2010 CN
102341249 Feb 2012 CN
102529257 Jul 2012 CN
102566343 Jul 2012 CN
102673209 Sep 2012 CN
104015415 Sep 2014 CN
105844621 Aug 2016 CN
107879147 Apr 2018 CN
0676300 Oct 1995 EP
0923007 Jun 1999 EP
48043941 Dec 1973 JP
S63274572 Nov 1988 JP
H09174646 Jul 1997 JP
H10130597 May 1998 JP
2000094660 Apr 2000 JP
2000141883 May 2000 JP
2000190468 Jul 2000 JP
2000337464 Dec 2000 JP
2003076159 Mar 2003 JP
2004340983 Dec 2004 JP
2005224737 Aug 2005 JP
2008082820 Apr 2008 JP
2009154377 Jul 2009 JP
2009532240 Sep 2009 JP
2009227909 Oct 2009 JP
2009240925 Oct 2009 JP
2009271422 Nov 2009 JP
2009279808 Dec 2009 JP
2010030300 Feb 2010 JP
4562388 Oct 2010 JP
2011064850 Mar 2011 JP
2011168024 Sep 2011 JP
2013104044 May 2013 JP
2014008609 Jan 2014 JP
2014073675 Apr 2014 JP
2015202616 Nov 2015 JP
2016074206 May 2016 JP
2016179678 Oct 2016 JP
2017093178 May 2017 JP
2018017429 Feb 2018 JP
2020014350 Jan 2020 JP
2015026864 Feb 2015 WO
2017208152 Dec 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (59)
Entry
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/414,087, inventors Benzion; Landa et al., filed Jun. 15, 2021.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/438,497, inventors Helena; Chechik et al., filed Sep. 13, 2021.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/507,758, inventor Shmaiser; Aharon, filed Oct. 21, 2021.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/522,383, inventor Landa, filed Nov. 9, 2021.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/530,507, filed Nov. 19, 2021.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/583,372, filed Jan. 25, 2022.
JP2003076159A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Mar. 14, 2003, Ricoh KK.
JP2004340983A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Dec. 2, 2004; Ricoh KK.
JP2008082820A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Apr. 10, 2008; Ricoh KK.
JP2009532240A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Sep. 10, 2009; Aisapack Holding SA.
JP2010030300A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Feb. 12, 2010; Xerox Corp.
JP2011064850A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Mar. 31, 2011; Seiko Epson Corp.
JP4562388B2 Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Oct. 13, 2010; SK Kaken Co Ltd.
Xiameter™ “OFS-0777 Siliconate Technical Data Sheet,” Dec. 31, 2017, 5 pages. [Retrieved from the internet on Oct. 13, 2021]: https://www.dow.com/en-us/document-viewer.html?ramdomVar=6236427586842315077&docPath=/content/dam/dcc/documents/en-us/productdatasheet/95/95-4/95-435-01-xiameter-ofs-0777-siliconate.pdf.
CN101096455A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Jan. 2, 2008 Fujifilm Corp.
CN101248146A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Aug. 20, 2008 Ricoh KK.
CN101433074A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published May 13, 2009; Kyocera Mita Corp [JP].
CN101592896A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Dec. 2, 2009; Canon KK.
CN101820241A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Sep. 1, 2010; Canon KK.
CN102341249A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Feb. 1, 2012 Eastman Kodak Co.
CN102529257A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Jul. 4, 2012; Nippon Synthetic Chem Ind.
CN102566343A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Jul. 11, 2012; Canon KK.
CN102673209A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Sep. 19, 2012; Wistron Corp.
CN104015415A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Sep. 3, 2014; Avery Dennison Corp.
CN105844621A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Aug. 10, 2016; Fuyang Feiyang Printing Co Ltd.
CN107879147A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Apr. 6, 2018; Brother Ind Ltd.
CN1305895A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Aug. 1, 2001; Imaje SA [FR].
CN1543404A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Nov. 3, 2004; 3M Innovative Properties Co [US].
CN1703326A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Nov. 30, 2005; Nissha Printing [JP].
CN1961015A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on May 9, 2007 Dainippon Ink & Chemicals.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/788,335, inventors Benzion; Landa et al., filed Jun. 23, 2022.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/894,172, inventors Landa; Benzion et al., filed Aug. 23, 2022.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/963,225, inventors Burkatovsky; Vitaly et al., filed Oct. 11, 2022.
IP.com search (Year: 2022).
JP2000094660A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Apr. 4, 2000; Brother Ind Ltd.
JP2000141883A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on May 23, 2000 Ricoh KK.
JP2000190468A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Jul. 11, 2000 Brother Ind Ltd.
JP2000337464A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Dec. 5, 2000; Fuji Xerox Co Ltd.
JP2004117118A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Apr. 15, 2004; Nidec Copal Corp.
JP2005224737A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Aug. 25, 2005; Mitsubishi Paper Mills Ltd.
JP2006256087 Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Sep. 28, 2006; Ricoh Printing Sys Ltd.
JP2009154377A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Jul. 16, 2009; Fujifilm Corp.
JP2009227909A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Oct. 8, 2009 Fujifilm Corp.
JP2009240925A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Oct. 22, 2009; Fujifilm Corp.
JP2009271422A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Nov. 19, 2009; Ricoh KK.
JP2009279808A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Dec. 3, 2009; Fuji Xerox Co Ltd.
JP2011168024A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Sep. 1, 2011 Ricoh Co Ltd.
JP2013104044A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published May 30, 2013; Three M Innovative Properties.
JP2014008609A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Jan. 20, 2014 Seiko Epson Corp.
JP2014073675A Machine Translation (EPO and Google) published on Apr. 24, 2014 Ricoh Co Ltd.
JP2015202616A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Nov. 16, 2015 Canon KK.
JP2016074206A Machine Translation (EPO and Google) published on May 12, 2016 Xerox Corp.
JP2016179678A Machine Translation (EPO, PlatPat and Google) published on Oct. 13, 2016 Xerox Corp.
JP2017093178A Machine Translation (EPO and Google) published on May 25, 2017 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd.
JP2018017429A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Feb. 1, 2018; Rinnai KK.
JP2020014350A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Jan. 23, 2020; Toshiba Mitsubishi Elec Ind.
JP48043941 Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Dec. 21, 1973.
JPH10130597A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published May 19, 1998; Sekisui Chemical Co Ltd.
JPS63274572A Machine Translation (by EPO and Google)—published Nov. 11, 1988; Canon KK.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220176693 A1 Jun 2022 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16784208 Feb 2020 US
Child 17551219 US
Parent 15556324 US
Child 16784208 US