Everyone is aware of the dangers associated with living in today's society. Every night many homes are broken into. Criminals are not always looking for items to steal, in fact, they often times enter a home to cause harm to the occupants. A recent case that was publicized extensively in the media reminds us of the types of violent predators that exist. Dr. William Petit Jr. and his family resided in Connecticut when their home was burglarized. Two men claimed that they had entered the house only to steal some items. However, once they were inside the home, they committed some of the most heinous crimes imaginable. They beat Dr. Petit with a baseball bat until he was nearly dead. They killed his 17 year old daughter. Then they raped his wife and 11 year old daughter before dousing them with gasoline and setting them on fire. It is necessary to make security devices available to families so that they can be protected from intruders. This need is filled by the present invention.
The present invention is an indoor security barricade designed to create a temporary blockade between a home's occupants and any intruders. Using conventional technology, the present invention can quickly seal off a portion of a home during periods of danger or increased vulnerability, such as when occupants are asleep. It can also be used in office buildings, schools, courthouses, government buildings, etc., in order to isolate active shooters or other hostile intruders. Within these public places, it can be moved into place by employees, or remotely deployed by security personnel from a control room.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,739,100 is for “Retractable In House Open Stairwell Cover” issued to Lewandowski on May 25, 2004. Lewandowski is a retractable stairwell cover designed to seal a stairwell opening in order to create an environmental divider between “an unconditioned environment in a basement and a conditioned environment on the first floor of a home.” Lewandowski differs from the present invention in several respects. Lewandowski explicitly states its purpose as being to provide a barrier between conditioned air and unconditioned air, whereas the present invention's explicit purpose is to provide a security barrier. Furthermore, Lewandowski is intended specifically to create a barrier over a stairwell connecting a first floor to a basement, whereas the present invention is envisioned as a stairwell barricade, an exterior entrance barricade, and a hallway barricade.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,487,237 is for “Security Device for Buildings” issued to Martin, Jr. on Jan. 30, 1996. Martin, Jr. is a conventional security barricade for blocking a doorway or window opening of a building structure. Unlike the present invention, Martin Jr. is a conventional metalwork barricade, and cannot be lowered into place by electrical or manual means in order to seal off specific areas of a home.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,134,815 is for “Barrier Structure” issued to Pickett on Aug. 4, 1992. Pickett is a barrier structure disposed to extend generally along a fence line. Unlike the present invention, Pickett is designed as an outdoor security fence, whereas the present invention is an indoor security barricade.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,463,702, for “Concrete Safe Room” issued to Weaver et al. on Oct. 15, 2002, is a system for forming a safe room that includes a plurality of preformed concrete wall panels and a roof panel, and is intended as a safe haven during a weather storm. U.S. Pat. No. 6,438,906, for “Safe Room” issued to Komarowski et al. on Aug. 27, 2002, is designed for protecting an occupant of a home against tornado and/or strong winds. Unlike the present invention, Weaver et al. and Komarowski et al. are designed to protect one or more occupants of a home from extreme weather conditions, and are not designed to protect from home invaders or other criminals.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,458,305, for “Modular Safe Room” issued to Hollander et al. on Dec. 2, 2008, and U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0293420 for “Ballistic and Forced Entry Resistant Construction” by Smith et al. published on Dec. 3, 2009, are for safe rooms made of panels of ballistic resistant material in order to provide a bullet-resistant room for personnel in times of danger. Unlike the present invention, both Hollander et al. and Smith et al. require the construction of a separate safe room in order to provide security from criminals, whereas the present invention does not require adding a room to a home.
U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0254166 is for “Customizable Saferoom and Method for Making Same” issued to Michels et al. on Nov. 16, 2006. Michels et al. is for a safe room made of multiple panels, endwalls and sidewalls. Unlike the present invention, Michels et al. requires walling off an area such as a crawlspace in order to construct a safe haven, whereas the present invention creates a safe zone by means of a barricade that blocks immediate access to a portion of a home.
The present invention is a home security barricade that deploys to seal off part of a home from intruders. The barrier portion of the present invention is designed to be placed in an unobtrusive position during periods of low vulnerability, and deployed during periods of increased vulnerability such as when the occupants of a home are asleep. The present invention can also be used in office buildings, schools, courthouses, and government buildings in order to isolate active shooters or other hostile intruders. Within these public places, the barrier portion of the present invention can be moved into place by employees or remotely deployed by security personnel from a control room.
The construction of the barrier is accomplished as follows. A sales representative takes measurements of the location where the present invention is to be installed. These measurements are used to shape the barrier so that it can be deployed into position without striking a handrail, doorknob, or other object. The measurements are then forwarded to a supplier of impact resistant material who custom shapes the barrier and places it in a heavy duty frame made of metal or other material of comparable durability. A decorative image selected by the customer is then applied to the barrier, the decorative image being a photograph, canvas painting, or other type of graphic design. Thus the barrier consists of impact resistant material placed in a heavy duty frame with a decorative image applied to it.
The installation of the present invention may require a building contractor and an electrician, depending on the type of mechanism used to deploy the device. If an electrical mechanism is chosen by the user, then an electrician can ensure that an electric winch is plugged into an electrical outlet with a dedicated circuit breaker. The building contractor can ensure the electric winch is mounted to wall studs or ceiling joists in accordance with local building codes. The barrier can then be placed into position, attached to the wall studs or ceiling joists by means of one or more heavy-duty hinges, with a heavy-duty cable attached to both the electric winch and the barrier. Once these steps are complete, the present invention is ready for use.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention is a stairwell barricade. In this embodiment, the barrier is attached to a wall adjacent to a stairwell opening. It attaches to wall joists by means of one or more heavy duty hinges, and locks in place against the wall when inactive. The barrier is deployed when the user lowers it over the stairwell opening and locks it in place by means of a conventional locking mechanism. This embodiment is illustrated in the figures below.
Another embodiment of the present invention is an exterior entrance barricade. In this embodiment, the barrier is placed near an exterior entrance and attached to ceiling joists near the entrance by means of one or more heavy-duty hinges. The barrier is pulled up to the ceiling when inactive, and when activated the barrier lowers in order to block the exterior entrance. Once it is lowered into position so that it blocks the exterior entrance, the user then locks the barrier into position by means of a conventional locking mechanism.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention is a hallway barricade. In this embodiment, the barrier is attached to a wall adjacent to a hallway opening. The barrier is attached to wall joists by means of one or more heavy-duty hinges, and is deployed when the user moves the barrier over the hallway opening and locks it in place by means of a conventional locking mechanism.
The present invention is an indoor security barricade comprised of numerous parts, chief among them the barrier (10) itself. The barrier (10) is made of impact resistant material placed into a heavy duty frame and imprinted with a decorative image such as a photograph, canvas painting, or other type of graphic design. The impact resistant material can be steel plate or marble, although the preferred embodiment is material of a lighter weight yet still impact resistant, such as high density polyurethane. In order to make the barrier (10) fit the place of installation, detailed measurements are taken and forwarded to a supplier who custom cuts the impact resistant material. Once the impact resistant material has been shaped, it is placed into the heavy duty frame and the decorative image is applied. The resulting barrier (10) is then installed in the customer's home, office or other locale, along with conventional equipment that includes a heavy-duty cable (50), a heavy-duty hinge (15), and other conventional mounting hardware. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a heavy-duty piano hinge is used as the hinge (15).
Alternate embodiments of the present invention, not represented in figures, are described below. One alternate embodiment is also a stairwell barricade, although it is manually deployed, employing a conventional spring and cable system. The spring and cable system, similar to the type used to reduce the amount of force needed to raise trailer gates, is installed in the wall (20) behind the barrier (10), bolted to a wall stud (105), with its cable (50) attached to the barrier (10). As force is applied to the barrier (10) in order to lower or raise it, the cable (50) extends or retracts, allowing the barrier (10) to move up or down on its one or more hinges (15). When force is not being applied, the barrier (10) stops moving. The spring and cable system does not allow the barrier (10) to fall to the stairwell (30) or slam closed against the wall (20), but stops the barrier (10) in place whenever pressure is not being applied to raise or lower it. Once the barrier (10) is fully deployed or fully raised, conventional locking mechanisms are used to secure it in place.
Another embodiment of the present invention that is not illustrated in the figures is an exterior entrance barricade. In this embodiment, the barrier (10) is placed near an exterior entrance and attached to ceiling joists near the entrance by means of one or more hinges (15). The barrier (10) is pulled up to the ceiling when inactive, and deploys either electrically or manually so that the barrier is suspended by both a cable (50) and one or more hinges (15) in order to block the exterior entrance. Once the barrier (10) is lowered into position so that it blocks the exterior entrance, the user then locks the barrier (10) into position by means of a conventional locking mechanism.
Yet another envisioned embodiment of the present invention is a hallway barricade. In this embodiment, the barrier (10) is attached to a wall adjacent to a hallway opening. The barrier (10) locks in place against the wall when inactive and is attached to wall studs (105) by means of one or more hinges (15). The barrier (10) is deployed by moving it over the hallway opening and locking it in place by means of a conventional locking mechanism.
In summary, the present invention is a security barricade, comprising a barrier (10), the barrier (10) configured to lower over a stairwell (30) to meet the plane of a landing (33) at the top of the stairwell (30); a first side (16) of the barrier (10), the first side (16) facing downward toward the stairwell (30); a second side (17) of the barrier (10), the second side (17) facing upward away from the stairwell (30); a first locking mechanism (11) disposed on the first side of the barrier (10); a second locking mechanism (13) disposed on the second side of the barrier (10); wherein the barrier (10) has a gap (60) configured to allow the barrier (10) to lower around a handrail (140) of the stairwell (30); wherein the first side (16) of the barrier (10) is configured to prevent opening of the barrier (10); wherein the barrier (10) is configured to raise away from the stairwell (30) and to rest against a wall (20); further comprising a cable (50) between the barrier (10) and the wall (20); and further comprising a switch (115) in communication with the barrier (10), the switch (115) configured to raise and lower the barrier (10).
The present invention should not be taken as limited to the above embodiments, as its concept may also take the form of additional embodiments not explicated in this document.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
203343 | Jackson | May 1878 | A |
270635 | Castor | Jan 1883 | A |
951280 | Jones | Mar 1910 | A |
1098957 | Moffitt | Jun 1914 | A |
1715903 | Dame | Jun 1929 | A |
1759207 | Rose et al. | May 1930 | A |
2137751 | Davis | Nov 1938 | A |
2174989 | Lyons | Oct 1939 | A |
2200727 | Swenson | May 1940 | A |
2257791 | Edmister | Oct 1941 | A |
2582540 | Gruse | Jan 1952 | A |
3100915 | Pennington et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
3419999 | Scheafbauer | Jan 1969 | A |
3665661 | Beckerer | May 1972 | A |
4412404 | Manning | Nov 1983 | A |
4532915 | de Rham | Aug 1985 | A |
4832153 | Daw et al. | May 1989 | A |
5018322 | Fujita | May 1991 | A |
5134815 | Pickett | Aug 1992 | A |
5487237 | Martin, Jr. | Jan 1996 | A |
5735086 | Fordahl | Apr 1998 | A |
5788406 | Hernandez | Aug 1998 | A |
5953866 | Poole | Sep 1999 | A |
6438906 | Komarowski et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463702 | Weaver et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6739100 | Lewandowski | May 2004 | B1 |
7458305 | Hollander et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7690165 | Taylor | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8166706 | Slimak et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20060254166 | Michels et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090293420 | Smith et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100199578 | Checketts | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120279134 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |