This disclosure relates to induction cooking systems.
In induction cooking, an alternating current in an induction coil produces a time-varying magnetic field that induces current flow in a conductive (typically ferromagnetic) target that is a part of the cookware. The induced current flow causes the target to heat. The heat is transferred to the cooking surface for heating or cooking food or other items located on the cooking surface of the cookware.
An induction cooking system may benefit from measuring the cooking temperature of cookware used in the system. For example, a system which monitors the cooking temperature of its cookware can control the delivery of energy to the cookware to improve cooking performance or to ensure the cookware stays within a safe (or desired) temperature operating range. Temperature sensors can fail or become unreliable for periods of time, and, as such, it can be beneficial to have a system with redundant temperature sensing capability. An absolute cookware temperature can be sensed directly with a contact or non-contact temperature sensor. The temperature sensor can be embedded in the cookware. A relative cookware temperature can be sensed by detecting changes in one or more parameters of an electrical circuit that includes a heated element of the cookware. Once the relative temperature is calibrated to the absolute temperature, the relative temperature becomes a reliable indicator of absolute temperature. This accomplishes redundant temperature sensing capability using only one physical temperature sensor.
Further, an induction cooking system that exclusively uses cool-touch cookware can be designed such that thermal barriers are positioned above the cooktop, thus permitting relatively delicate electronic components (such as an induction coil or microprocessor controllers) to be positioned very near (or even within) the cooktop surface and without any (or little) additional thermal protection. The cookware includes a target layer that is heated by electrical currents induced in the target by the electromagnetic field produced by an induction coil. The thermal barrier can include a layer of thermal insulation in the cookware, spaced from and directly below the target layer. The thermal barrier can also include the gap between the target layer and the insulation layer.
Cooling of the cooktop can be accomplished with a cooling chamber such as a plenum that is separate from the induction coil power electronics. The cooling chamber is immediately below the cooktop such that the lower cooktop surface forms the upper boundary of the cooling chamber. A cooling system such as a ventilation system moves cooling fluid, typically ambient air, through the cooling chamber. The cooling fluid helps to maintain the cooktop at a lower temperature than the outside of the cookware, which assists with transfer heat out of the cookware and keeps the cookware cool to the touch.
In general, one aspect of the disclosure features an induction cooking system that has an induction coil and an induction coil drive system that provides ac power to the induction coil. An absolute cookware temperature is directly sensed at one or more locations of the cookware. A distributed relative temperature of the cookware is indirectly sensed. The sensed absolute and relative temperatures can be compared, to accomplish an absolute temperature sensor that is responsive to a distributed temperature of the cookware.
The cookware temperature may be directly sensed using one or more temperature sensors that are physically coupled to the cookware. The cookware may comprise a target layer that is heated by induction, and a temperature sensor may be physically coupled to the target layer. The relative temperature of the cookware may be indirectly sensed using a first coil that is spaced from the cookware; the first coil may be located within or under the cooktop. The indirect cookware temperature sensing may be accomplished by measuring the value of an electrical variable of the circuit that comprises the first coil. The first coil may be but need not be the induction coil.
The relative temperature sensing aspect can be calibrated by correlating the sensed electrical variable with the directly sensed absolute cookware temperature. Calibration may be accomplished at least in part when the cookware is at a generally isothermal condition, which can be identified by determining an inflection point in the value of the sensed electrical variable and determining simultaneous relatively constant directly sensed temperature.
Various additional implementations may include one or more of the following features. The directly and indirectly sensed temperatures and a comparison of the two can be used to indicate an induction cooking system failure; this may be accomplished by determining whether the directly and indirectly sensed temperatures are within a safe temperature range, determining whether the directly and indirectly sensed temperatures are similar, determining whether the directly and indirectly sensed temperatures are changing in a similar manner, determining whether the absolute cookware temperature has recently been directly sensed, and determining whether calibration settings for the distributed relative temperature are within a predetermined operational range.
In general, another aspect of the disclosure features an induction cooking appliance that has a module comprising power electronics, one or more electrical coils operatively connected to the power electronics, a cooktop having an upper surface and a lower surface, and a cooling chamber, separate from the power electronics module. The lower surface of the cooktop forms a boundary of the cooling chamber. There is also a cooling system that flows cooling fluid through the cooling chamber. The cooling chamber may comprise a plenum coupled to the lower surface of the cooktop.
Various implementations may include one or more of the following features. The cooling system may include one or more fans that draw air into the cooling chamber. The cooktop may be generally planar, relatively thin, and have an edge along its perimeter; the cooling chamber may have air inlet openings in or proximate the edge. The cooktop perimeter may be generally rectangular and have four edges, and the air inlet openings may be in or proximate all four edges. The cooktop may be supported by a base that has a top front edge, and the cooktop may have a lip portion that extends past the top front edge of the base such that the lip portion projects forward of the top of the base; the air inlet openings may be in this lip portion.
The electrical coils may be located in the cooling chamber. The cooling chamber may have a lower boundary. The lower surface of the cooktop may form the upper boundary of the cooling chamber. The electrical coils may be spaced from both the lower boundary and the upper boundary of the cooling chamber. The electrical coils are typically spaced from one another and the cooling chamber may further comprise baffles in spaces between the coils, the baffles extending essentially from the lower boundary of the cooling chamber to the lower surface of the cooktop. The cooling chamber may have unoccupied air gaps between the tops of each of the coils and the adjacent lower surface of the cooktop. The power electronics module may be located below the cooling chamber.
The induction cooking appliance may further comprise custom cookware configured to be placed on the cooktop above an electrical coil, and a temperature sensing system that senses a temperature of the custom cookware. The temperature sensing system may comprise a temperature sensor that senses a temperature of the target. The temperature of the cooktop underneath the portion of the outer wall of the cookware that is on the cooktop is preferably less than the temperature of the portion of the outer wall of the cookware that is on the cooktop.
In general, in another aspect the disclosure features an induction cooking system with an induction cooking appliance and custom cookware. The induction cooking appliance includes a cooktop having an upper and lower surface, power electronics located below the lower surface of the cooktop, and an electrical coil positioned below the lower surface of the cooktop. The electrical coil is operatively connected to the power electronics and configured to produce an electromagnetic field when the coil is energized by the power electronics. The custom cookware is configured to be placed on the cooktop above the electrical coil, and includes an inner wall comprising a target layer formed of an electrically conductive material and an outer wall formed at least partially of a first layer of thermal insulation material, wherein the first layer of thermal insulation material is spaced from the target layer such that there is a gap between the thermal insulation and the target layer.
Various implementations may include one or more of the following features. The cookware may further include a seal between the inner and outer walls, and a space between the inner and outer walls. The target layer may be in the space, physically coupled to the inner wall and spaced from the outer wall. There may be a temperature sensor operatively coupled to the target layer, and a transmitter operatively coupled to the temperature sensor. The pressure in the space between the walls of the cookware may be less than 14.7 pounds per square inch. The space may include a gas that is less heat conductive than air. The thermal resistance of the space between the inner and outer walls and the first layer of thermal insulation material in combination may be at least 10 degrees C. per watt. The electrical coil may be positioned immediately below and spaced from the lower surface of the cooktop.
The induction cooking system may also include a controller operatively coupled to the transmitter. There may also be one or more cooktop cooling fans. The controller may control the cooling fans based at least in part on the temperature of the target. The controller may be arranged to determine whether the seal has failed by determining one or more of whether a structure that is in contact with the outer wall of the cookware has exceeded a predetermined temperature, whether a temperature in the space between the inner and outer walls has exceeded a predetermined temperature, whether a pressure in the space between the inner and outer walls is outside of a predetermined pressure range, whether a pressure in the space between the inner and outer walls is not changing in a predetermined manner as the cookware temperature changes, and whether one or more physical portions of the cookware that are in or exposed to the space between the inner and outer walls have been displaced.
The temperature sensor may be a direct contact temperature sensor physically coupled to the target layer, or may be a non-contact sensor. The cookware may include a power coil tuned to couple to an electromagnetic field produced by the electrical coil to generate electrical power sufficient to operate the transmitter. The transmitter may comprise an RF enabled microprocessor. The cookware outer wall may be made at least in part of electrically non-conductive material, and the transmitter may be spaced from the first layer of thermal insulation material. The transmitter may comprise a second temperature sensor.
An induction cooking system may benefit from measuring the cooking temperature of cookware used in the system. For example, a system which monitors the cooking temperature of its cookware can control the delivery of energy to the cookware to improve cooking performance or to ensure the cookware stays within a safe (or desired) temperature operating range. Temperature sensors can fail or become unreliable for periods of time, and, as such, it can be beneficial to have a system with redundant temperature sensing capability.
Further, an induction cooking system that exclusively uses cool-touch cookware can be designed such that thermal barriers are positioned above the cooktop, thus permitting relatively delicate electrical and electronic components (such as an induction coil or microprocessor controllers) to be positioned very near (or even within) the cooktop surface and without any (or little) additional thermal protection.
Cooling of the cooktop can be accomplished with a cooling chamber such as a plenum that is separate from the induction coil power electronics. The cooling chamber can be immediately below the cooktop such that the lower surface of the cooktop forms the upper boundary of the cooling chamber. A cooling system such as a ventilation system can move cooling fluid, typically ambient air, through the cooling chamber. The cooling fluid acts to maintain the cooktop at a lower temperature than the outside of the cookware, which helps to transfer heat out of the cookware and keep the cookware cool to the touch.
For example, as shown in
Cool-touch cookware 20 comprises inner wall 22 that heats food or liquid (not shown) placed within the cavity formed by wall 22. Cookware 20 also includes outer wall 26 that is preferably made fully or partially from a material that is not heated by the time-varying electromagnetic field produced by the induction coil 52. By having an outer wall that is transparent to the electromagnetic field, little power is dissipated in the outer wall due to the field such that there is little direct heating of the outer wall by the field. This helps to keep the outer surface of the outer wall relatively cool during use. Outer wall 26 can be made from a plastic material such as bulk molding compound, melamine or liquid crystal polymer. Inner wall 22 and outer wall 26 are preferably spaced from one another to define space 30 between them. Inner wall 22 and outer wall 26 are sealed to each other along the perimeter 38 of the cookware 20 and a space 30 is formed between the inner and outer walls. The space 30 is used to house other elements of the cooking system 10 and can also help thermally isolate the outer wall from the target layer and the inner wall.
Target layer 24 is made from an electrically conductive material and preferably a ferromagnetic material such as 400 series stainless steel, iron or the like. Target layer 24 is the primary material that is inductively heated via the electromagnetic field generated by inductive coil 52. Preferably, target 24 is directly coupled to inner wall 22 to provide effective heat transfer from target 24 into wall 22.
A layer of thermal insulation material 28 is located within space 30 and positioned beneath target 24. Insulation material 28 helps to inhibit radiant and convective heat transfer from target 24 to outer wall 26. Insulation material 28 may be located only on the bottom portion 27 of outer wall 26 as shown in the drawing or may extend partially or fully up along the inside of the upper portion of wall 26. Insulation material 28 is preferably spaced from target layer 24; alternatively it may fill some or essentially all of cavity 30. Insulation material 28 is preferably formed of materials that are not substantially affected by the electromagnetic field produced by the induction coil. For example, the insulation material may be a layer of aerogel that is bounded on both faces by a thin reflective film such as a metalized plastic film. The metalized layer may have breaks formed in the conductive surface to minimize generation of eddy currents. The thickness of the metalized layer may be made significantly smaller than the skin depth of the eddy currents in the metallization material. In some embodiments, the insulation may be a thermally insulating mat material. In some embodiments, the insulation material is spaced away from the inner wall so that a small gap is formed between the inner wall structure and the bottom surface of the insulation material. The insulation material is effective at inhibiting heat transfer between target 24 and the portion of outer wall 26 that is covered by insulation 28. Heat transfer can be further inhibited by other constructional aspects such as creating a vacuum within space 30 or filling space 30 with a material that is a poor heat conductor, such as a gas such as argon gas. Further examples and description of cool-touch cookware are disclosed in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/205,447, filed on Sep. 5, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Induction heating system 50 comprises induction coil 52 located just underneath or potentially embedded within cooktop 40. Cooktop 40 is preferably made from a ceramic glass material. However, in a system that exclusively uses cool touch cookware (like cookware 20), many other materials may be used for cooktop 40, including materials that have relatively poor heat resistance (compared to ceramic glass). For example, materials such as solid surface countertop materials, wood, tile, laminate countertop materials, vinyl, glass other than ceramic glass, or plastic, may be used for the cooktop.
Coil drive 54 provides alternating current to induction coil 52 under control of controller 56. Controller 56 is preferably a microprocessor that executes software or firmware to control operation of the induction coil 52 and other aspects of heating system 50. Controller 56 can use temperature data about the cookware in its control. The use of a controller to control operation of a coil drive for an induction coil in an induction cooking system is further disclosed and described in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/335,787, filed on Dec. 16, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
System 10 may use redundant temperature sensing. Specifically, system 10 may use both direct and indirect temperature sensing. A direct temperature sensor 31 is coupled to the target 24 and is located within the space 30 between the inner and outer walls of the cookware 20. In this example, the direct temperature sensor 31 directly contacts the target 24 and thus provides a direct temperature reading of the target. However, non-contact direct temperature sensors can also be used, such as optically-based sensors. Direct temperature sensor 30 may be any known contact or non-contact temperature sensor such as a thermocouple, thermistor, infrared sensor, etc. Additionally, while the example in
In the example depicted in
Cookware 20 further includes wireless transmission device 32 that is operatively connected to the direct temperature sensor 31 to receive its sensed temperature data. The wireless transmitting device 32 transmits the sensed temperature to the induction heating system 50 where it is used as an input to the controller. In one non-limiting implementation, wireless transmission device 32 may be a radio-frequency (RF) enabled microcontroller that communicates via RF with RF transceiver 66. An RF enabled microcontroller can also communicate cookware identification information, which allows cookware temperature calibration data to be associated with the particular cookware. The cookware information can be located in memory associated with the induction cooking system, or memory embedded in the cookware itself. As one example, if calibration data for a particular piece of cookware is held in memory of the induction cooking appliance as opposed to the cookware, and cookware identification information is transmitted from the cookware once it is placed over a coil and the cooking system is turned on so as to operate the coil, the cookware temperature calibration developed specifically for the subject piece of cookware will remain associated with the piece of cookware regardless of which cooktop induction coil it is used with.
Power can be provided to wireless transmission device 32 using pick-up coil 33 that is operatively connected to wireless transmitter 32. Pick-up coil 33 is inductively coupled to the induction heating system 50 to provide power to the wireless transmitter 32 during operation. When such an energy pick-up coil 33 is used, it may be physically located closer to induction coil 52 than shown in the drawing, for example, embedded within or just below or on top of the lower portion 27 of cookware outer wall 26. Closer physical proximity generally accomplishes better electromagnetic coupling, which improves efficiency of the power transfer from the induction coil to the energy pickup coil.
In addition to direct temperature sensor 31 that senses one or more specific locations within the cookware 20, system 10 includes an indirect temperature sensor that indirectly senses a distributed relative temperature of the cookware. In the example shown in
In the example shown in
In addition, other electrical parameters such as the voltage and/or current of the power provided by coil drive system 54 to primary coil 52 or secondary coil 58 also are inherently known as part of drive system 54. This information can be provided to controller 56 directly from coil drive system 54 rather than the information being detected by a separate sensor 64. Changes in directly provided coil drive current or voltage can be correlated to target temperature changes in the same manner as described above. This obviates the need for a separate sensor 64. Still other measured RLC circuit values can be used as the basis for independent temperature sensing, including its resonant frequency, resonant damping, peak to peak current excitation when excited with a square wave, and various other methods of target resistance measurement that would be apparent to one skilled in the art.
Induction heating system 50 can be used to determine the capacitance of the RLC circuit used for the indirect temperature measurement. This can be done without cookware present, so that the cookware target does not form part of an inductive tank and thus contribute to the capacitance determination. Because wire production and coil winding are typically tightly controlled in the coil manufacturing process, the resistance and inductance of the RLC circuit that includes the coil can be predetermined, and can be assumed to be essentially constant from coil to coil. However, the capacitance of the RLC circuit can vary over a wide range from hob to hob. The capacitance of the coil (e.g., either main coil 52 or secondary coil 58,
The indirectly sensed temperature is preferably calibrated to an absolute cookware temperature to improve accuracy of the indirectly sensed temperature. Calibration can be done before the system is used to cook food and/or during one or more cooking operations. Because calibration improves the accuracy of indirect temperature sensing, it can allow the indirect sensing to be used as an effective absolute temperature sensor. Thus, the indirect temperature sensing can be used as a back-up in case the direct temperature sensor fails.
Calibration can be accomplished by setting the cookware to a known temperature and then measuring the value of an electrical variable of the RLC circuit and equating the known temperature with the variable value, and saving the data in a look-up table or other memory. The correlation between the indirect sensing and the absolute cookware temperature should be accomplished while the cookware is at one or more known temperatures. A known temperature can be provided by including absolute temperature sensor 31. Thus, calibration of the cookware can be accomplished while the cookware is being used to cook food, without the use of any special equipment or procedures. If the temperature calibration data and the cookware identification data are stored in a memory associated with system control 56, whenever the cookware is placed on the cooktop over coil 52 the temperature calibration data can be retrieved and used. Temperature calibration data can also be updated as the cookware is used over time.
Additionally or alternatively, the absolute temperature can be derived from the operation of system 10 itself, without the use of an absolute temperature sensor. For example, one or more sensed RLC circuit electrical parameters can be an indication of an isothermal condition of the cookware. As one non-limiting example, if water is placed in the cookware and allowed to boil, the water temperature will remain at the boiling point. When the cookware is in a relatively isothermal condition after equilibrating at the boiling point, the resistance and permeability of the target will remain relatively constant. Accordingly, determining an inflection point in the sensed electrical parameter of the RLC circuit can be an indication of an isothermal condition, such as steadily boiling water. The controller can calibrate the indirect temperature sensor by correlating the inflection point in the sensed electrical parameter of the RLC circuit with the boiling temperature of water.
An isothermal cookware condition can also be detected based on the simultaneous detection of a relatively constant directly-sensed temperature and a relatively constant alternating signal supplied to the induction coil. This condition is indicative of a constant power being used to heat the cookware contents and a constant temperature of the cookware contents, and so implies that the cookware contents are at or close to the cookware temperature; in other words the cookware is at an isothermal state. The controller can calibrate the indirect temperature to the directly sensed temperature at an isothermal condition of the cookware determined by any of the above methodologies, or in other manners as could be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art.
Calibration of indirect temperature sensing to direct temperature sensing across the normal operating range of the cookware can be accomplished by heating the cookware to at least the highest expected operating temperature of the cookware, shutting off the power to induction coil 52 to stop the heating, and then taking measurements of and equating the absolute and indirect temperature as the cookware cools.
System 10 can also be enabled to perform calibration of the indirectly-sensed temperature when commanded to do so by the user via the user interface. Calibration at nominally 100° C. can be enabled when the cookware contains boiling water. Higher temperature calibration can be enabled when a liquid such as cooking oil that will not boil at normal cooking temperatures is heated above 100° C.
The system, 10 thus directly senses the absolute cookware temperature at one or more locations of the cookware. System 10 can also indirectly sense a distributed relative temperature of the cookware. Both sets of data coming from the same cookware accomplishes redundancy that allows for cross checks that may improve the reliability of temperature measurement. The access to both measurements and the ability to rely on either one or both of them provides several functional capabilities. Also, comparisons of the directly and indirectly sensed cookware temperatures can provide an indication as to whether a failure has occurred in the system 10. For example, a failure can be indicated if either (or both) of the directly or indirectly sensed temperatures fall outside of a safe temperature range. This can be useful to help prevent damage or injury due to overheating.
Comparisons between the direct and indirect temperature measurements can detect failure of one of the temperature sensors since both temperature measurements should change in a similar manner. One temperature measurement showing an increasing temperature while the other shows decreasing temperature, or one temperature measurement showing increasing temperature at a fast rate while the other stays nearly constant or increases at a slow rate, are examples of conditions that can be an indication of a failure of one or both temperature sensors. Thus, if the directly and indirectly sensed temperatures are not changing in a similar manner, the direct or indirect (or both) temperature sensor may have failed.
The direct temperature sensing function can also be determined to be problematic if a wireless transmission of temperature data from the cookware is not received within an expected time frame, or if the wireless data received indicates a potential problem with the temperature sensor itself. For example, a dramatic temperature change in a short period of time can indicate that the direct temperature sensor or the wireless transmitter has failed. In the case where the indirect sensing has been calibrated to the direct sensing, the calibration settings themselves should stay within a predetermined operational range or else there can be an indication of a failure. Appropriate action (such as issuing a warning to the user and/or disabling the induction coil power source) can be taken upon indication of a failure.
The directly sensed absolute temperature and the indirectly sensed distributed relative temperature of the cookware also can be compared in a desired manner in system controller 56 to accomplish an absolute temperature sensor that is responsive to a distributed temperature of the cookware. Such comparison can be, for example, the average of the two or some other weighted combination of the two, the absolute difference, the difference in the rate of change, or other manners of comparison including but not limited to those described herein. An average or other combination could be more accurate for a whole cookware temperature measurement than either of the two alone, so could be useful in a feedback temperature control system.
System controller 56 can also determine the rate of change of the cookware temperature (based on either one of the directly and indirectly sensed temperatures, the two together and/or a separate comparison of the two) as a function of applied power. If there is no food or other substance in the cookware, the measured temperature will likely increase more quickly as a function of applied power than when there is food or liquid in the cookware. The rate of change of temperature as a function of applied power can thus be used as an indication of an empty or almost empty pan or other piece of cookware being located on the hob with the induction heater turned on. The controller 56 can take appropriate action when an “empty pot” condition is detected. For example, the user could be notified with a visual or auditory alert after some amount of predetermined time (e.g., to account for the cookware being pre-heated). Alternatively or in addition the system could automatically reduce the power to the coil to a lower level or shut it off completely as both a safety measure and a means of saving energy.
Block diagram 80,
Indirect distributed cookware temperature measurement is accomplished in this embodiment by sensing a parameter of the RLC circuit, in this case the voltage across the induction coil or the current in the coil, using sensor 86. Prior correlation of the value of the sensed parameter to the actual cookware temperature is used to create a table or algorithm 87 that is then used to convert the value from sensor 86 to a distributed cookware temperature determination 88. The temperature data is used by safety trigger 89. Blocks 87, 88 and 89 can be accomplished with a single microprocessor.
Temperature determinations 84 and 88 are compared 90 and this comparison is used in a third safety trigger 91. Blocks 90 and 91 can be accomplished with a single microprocessor. Comparison 90 can rely on and compare temperatures 84 and 88 in a desired manner, as described above.
Redundancy in cookware temperature measurement and comparison of sensed temperatures provides additional data that can increase the confidence that the measured values are correct. Thus, if a temperature sensor, either of the ends of a wireless link or any of the microprocessors fails, for example, the cookware temperature can still be determined. Redundancy and comparison also increases the system safety. For example, the induction cooking system can be designed to shut down induction coil 93 if any of the temperatures are out of range, and/or in other failure circumstances as described above. Shutoff can be accomplished by including relays 94, 95 and 96 in series with power supply 92 to coil 93, each operated by the output of one of the safety triggers. Multiple relays create additional redundancies that increase the reliability of the emergency shutoff system. Another manner of disabling the induction coil would be to turn off the gate drive in coil drive system 54,
In existing induction cooktops the outside of the cookware is hot. The cooktop close to the cookware is also hot. Overheat safety systems thus use a temperature sensor in the cooktop as the input to the overheat safety system. In the present system the outside of the cookware may be cool, which keeps the cooktop relatively cool. The cooktop temperature may thus not be a reliable indicator of cookware temperature. The redundant cookware temperature determination described herein can be used both for cooking purposes and safety purposes in a system in which the outer surface of the cookware is cool. The system and method are also useful with traditional induction cookware in which the outer surface is hot.
System 10,
Two other manners by which moisture infiltration into sealed space 30 can be detected include detecting whether a pressure in the sealed space has changed unexpectedly, and determining whether one or more physical portions of the cookware that are in or exposed to the sealed space have been displaced via thermal expansion caused by unexpected heating of the moisture in space 30. Pressure sensor 34 that senses the pressure in sealed space 30 may be included. If moisture infiltrates space 30 and is heated, the pressure in sealed space 30 may increase more than would be the case due to normal heating of space 30 during normal cookware operation. Also, if the seal remains open after failure, the pressure in space 30 may not rise to the extent that would be expected due to normal heating of space 30 during normal cookware operation with an intact seal. Pressure sensor 34 can sense the pressure and provide pressure data to system control 56. Data transmission could be accomplished via wireless transmitter 32, in which case pressure sensor 34 would be operatively connected to device 32. Alternatively or additionally, displacement sensor 35 may be located in space 30 or located against a structure that is within or exposed to space 30. Sensor 35 could sense small movements caused by overheating of such structure due to heating of moisture in space 30. As with the pressure sensor, the data from sensor 35 would be provided to system control 56.
The induction cooking system shown in
In system 10, the high thermal resistance elements (the gap below the target and the insulation) are located within the cookware as opposed to being located below the cooktop. By placing the high thermal resistance elements in the cool-touch cookware, the system reduces the temperature of the elements located on the opposite side of the high thermal resistance element from the main heat source (the induction target within the cookware). In this case, the elements that see reduced temperature are thus the outer surface of the cookware, the cooktop surface, the induction coil, and the power electronics (which includes the coil drive system). In this system, substantially less heat is transferred from the cookware into the induction cooking hardware (the cooktop encasing the coil and electronics) than in the traditional system. Thus, little or no insulating material is needed below the cooktop, and, as mentioned above, the induction coils and if desirable the electronics can be moved closer to the cooktop surface.
Furthermore, the design criteria for the thermal resistance elements is different in a cool-touch cookware system than in a non-cool touch cookware system. In a non-cool touch cookware system, the ambient temperature of the operating environment of the power electronics and coil is kept to a range that does not exceed the thermal operating limits of the hardware. In a cool touch cookware system, the thermal resistance elements are selected to avoid having surfaces accessible to a user that could burn or injure. These operating criteria are different and result in different requirements for the thermal resistances of the different elements. For example, the thermal resistance of the high thermal resistance element in the cool-touch cookware system (which may be, for example, an air gap, a piece of insulation, a vacuum, a vacuum insulation panel, or any combination thereof) should be at least 3 degrees C. per watt, preferably at least 4.4 degrees C. per watt, and more preferably at least 10 deg C. per watt, in order to keep temperatures of the exterior of the pan below approximately 70 deg C. under the majority of operating conditions. Because the ambient environment of power electronics may tolerate higher temperatures, and because less heat is conducted into the power electronics compartment than is present at the surface of the induction target, a lower thermal resistance for the high thermal resistance element in a non-cool touch cookware system can be used.
As mentioned above, a further benefit of moving the high thermal resistance element into the cookware is that it allows the coil to be optimally located based on other considerations such as efficiency of the coupling between the induction coil and the target, and optimal routing of air within the electronics compartment to dissipate heat radiated into the space by the power electronics and the coil, without having to insulate for heat soak back into the cooktop from the cookware.
The lower temperature at the upper surface of cooktop 40 also allows a reduction in the use of cooling fan(s) 62 for cooling of cooktop 40: potentially fewer fans operating at reduced power. The reduction in the cooktop temperature can also support changing air management around cooktop 40 and system 50. For example, the power electronics will be hotter than the cooktop. Thus, air from cooling fans 62 can be directed over the lower cooktop surface before being directed to the power electronics, which helps to keep the cooktop cool. Knowledge of cookware temperature can also allow better management of cooling fans used to cool the cookware. For example, when the cookware is hotter the fan speed can be increased via controller 56 to help cool the cooktop and thus draw more heat from the cookware so as to maintain the outer surface of the cookware at a low temperature.
As described above, the construction and arrangement of cool touch cookware 122, including the use of insulation layer 126 spaced from target layer 124, results in a cookware outer surface that is relatively cool while the cookware is in use. One result of this arrangement is that the heat flow from cookware 122 into cooktop 128 is relatively modest. Cooktop 128 is preferably maintained at a temperature below that of the outer surface of cookware 122 such that cooktop 128 acts as a heat sink for cookware 122; this assists in maintaining the outer surface of cookware 122 cool enough to be handled by human hands.
When coil 130 is electrically driven, resistive heating of the coil results in the generation of heat. For reasons stated herein, including the efficiency of the electromagnetic coupling between coil 130 and target layer 124, it is desirable to place coil 130 close to target layer 124 and thus close to or even potentially embedded within cooktop 128.
As cooktop 128 desirably acts as a heat sink for the cookware, to maintain both the cooktop and cookware at a low temperature it is helpful to assist with heat transfer out of the cooktop. Heat transfer out of the cooktop is enhanced by flowing ambient air over lower surface 131 of cooktop 128. In the present embodiment, air flow is directed through plenum 136 created by placing divider 134 spaced below cooktop 128. Plenum 136 may be coupled to cooktop 128. Coil 130 is located in plenum 136, preferably spaced from both divider 134 and cooktop 128 so that air flows over the top and bottom of the coil. This airflow is induced by fan 140 that pulls air in from the edge of the cooktop, into plenum 136, past the coil, and out of the plenum and into volume 142 located below divider 134. The airflow thus contributes to heat transfer out of the cooktop. The air flow also helps to cool coil 130, which decreases heat transfer from coil 130 to cooktop 128. Power electronics 132 also generate heat; placing them below divider 134 decreases heat transfer from power electronics module 132 to cooktop 128, which also assists in maintaining the cooktop at a relatively low temperature. Cooling air expelled by fan 140 also can help to cool power electronics module 132.
Induction cooking system 150 is shown in
In order to direct air over both the bottom of the cooktop and above and below the coils, it is useful to place a baffle 180,
A number of embodiments and options have been described herein. Modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the custom cool touch cookware may use only a single temperature sensing modality, which would typically be accomplished with a temperature sensor built into the cookware. Also, the cooling system that flows cooling fluid through the cooling chamber located just below the cooktop can be arranged other than as described above. For example the one or more fans may push air through the cooling chamber rather than inducing flow through the chamber. Also, the cooling fluid can be a gas other than air, or can be a liquid. As one example, the cooling system may flow cool water or a refrigerant through the cooling chamber. When a cooling fluid other than air is used, the cooling system may be comprise a closed loop for the coolant, with some means such as a heat exchanger to reject heat from the cooling fluid as necessary.
Accordingly, other embodiments are within the claims.
This application claims priority of Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/418,296, filed on Nov. 30, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3740513 | Peters, Jr. et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3742174 | Harnden, Jr. | Jun 1973 | A |
3742178 | Harnden, Jr. | Jun 1973 | A |
3742179 | Harnden, Jr. | Jun 1973 | A |
3745290 | Harnden, Jr. et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3777094 | Peters, Jr. | Dec 1973 | A |
3781506 | Ketchum et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3786220 | Harnden, Jr | Jan 1974 | A |
3823297 | Cunningham | Jul 1974 | A |
3979572 | Ito et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4381438 | Goessler et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4431892 | White | Feb 1984 | A |
4490596 | Hirai et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4587406 | Andre | May 1986 | A |
4617441 | Koide | Oct 1986 | A |
4638135 | Aoki | Jan 1987 | A |
4795886 | Carter, Jr. | Jan 1989 | A |
5611227 | Solovieff | Mar 1997 | A |
5893996 | Gross | Apr 1999 | A |
5951900 | Smrke | Sep 1999 | A |
5981916 | Griffiths et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6051821 | Dahl et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6140617 | Berkcan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6206564 | Adamczewski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6232585 | Clothier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246033 | Shah | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6274856 | Clothier et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6320169 | Clothier | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6462316 | Berkcan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6630650 | Bassill et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6737617 | Daum et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6904378 | Schilling et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6953919 | Clothier | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964515 | Asakura et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7005986 | Parks, III et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7049564 | Takada et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7102109 | Niiyama et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7157675 | Imura | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7473387 | Temple et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7557708 | Pachalok et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7692121 | Pinilla et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20040016348 | Sharpe | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050006379 | Sullivan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050193901 | Buehler | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242086 | Imura | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070221668 | Baarman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070257028 | Imura | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080029505 | Rosenbloom et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080110875 | Fisher | May 2008 | A1 |
20090065496 | England et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090065497 | England et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090065498 | Beverly et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090065499 | England et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090065500 | England et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090152260 | Fujinami et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090294437 | Plnilla et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100051608 | Tominaga et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100102054 | Fujinami et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100119668 | Maupin et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100147832 | Barker, III et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100219181 | Kusaka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110198342 | Fujinami et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110284524 | Okuda et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110315674 | Fujinami et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315675 | Sakakibara et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000904 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120037614 | Komoto et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120061381 | Hashimoto et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
297 03 787 | May 1997 | DE |
1347669 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1732357 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1625774 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1865754 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2094059 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2 203 029 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2308947 | Jul 1997 | GB |
6151049 | May 1994 | JP |
9082466 | Mar 1997 | JP |
WO9941950 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO2006050527 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006126345 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007097821 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2009032979 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2009033036 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2009099445 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO2010069825 | Jun 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Elder, Jacqueline and Trota, Andrew M.; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC; Memorandum to the Commission: Contractor Report on Evaluation of Sensor and Control Technologies to Address Cooking Fires on Glass Ceramic Cooktops; Jul. 8, 2002, pp. 1-2; Arthur D. Little, Inc.; An Evaluation of Sensor and Control Technologies to Address Cooking Fires on Glass Ceramic Cooktops—Final Report to U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; Feb. 25, 2002; Order No. CPSC-S-01-1193, pp. i-7-1. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Searching Authority issued in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/062557. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from the International Bureau of WIPO issued in corresponding application No. PCT/US2011/062557 mailed on Jun. 13, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120132646 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61418296 | Nov 2010 | US |