The field of the invention lies in industrial fire fighting systems and in particular, in floor nozzle systems having nozzles discharging through gratings positioned over trenches.
The instant floor nozzles and fire fighting system are adapted to provide a fixed fire fighting system and method for industrial complexes, in particular complexes having expensive equipment and/or personnel whose protection could profit from a significant discharge of fire fighting fluid from trenches in the floor, and where protection may be optimized by having nozzle discharges shaped to optimally cover and protect specified equipment or areas.
Explosions frequently accompany industrial fires and may disable portions or all of fixed sprinkler systems mounted on ceilings or walls, as well as floor mounted monitor systems. Industrial fires and related explosions, however, typically do not affect or disable equipment and apparatus stationed in trenches in an industrial floor. Fire fighting nozzles working out of trenches, thus, can likely more reliably protect equipment and personnel. Trench systems, further, can possibly cover equipment from preferable angles and locations, as compared to sprinkler systems installed in ceilings or walls or fixed monitors stationed around floors. Further again, industrial fires at times “settle” on a floor of a facility. A floor nozzle system, installed in floor drainage trenches, is well positioned to address the settled fire. As an additional advantage, a trench fire fighting system can offer superior protection to personnel walkways during an emergency.
A prior art system for floor nozzles is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,181,767 and 6,371,212, inventor Eldon D. Jackson. The floor nozzle of the Jackson system was initially or primarily designed to meet needs of aircraft hangars. Floor nozzles for aircraft hangars are required to keep their discharges low, below the wings and engines of the aircraft. This can be a stringent design requirement.
Jackson solved problems of prior art hangar nozzle systems that were either (1) pop-up trench nozzles (which created a personnel hazard and possibly malfunction issues); or (2) floor stationed oscillating monitors and nozzles (which could become bumped and moved and misaligned and blocked by equipment); or (3) fixed trench systems (that simply disgorged foam, as opposed to having a nozzle that “threw” foam, and which had poor or slow foam dispensing characteristics.)
Jackson teaches a fixed trench nozzle solution that is permanently situated at optimal locations in floor trenches and need not pop up to provide adequate discharge patterns. The Jackson design avoids creating personnel hazards as well as malfunction or bumping or misaligning or blocking issues. The Jackson fixed trench nozzle is staged flush with the floor and provides a “nozzle,” as opposed to a simple foam disgorgement system, which nozzle can discharge foam essentially laterally and in 360°, with significant range.
Jackson's fixed trench nozzle installed flush in the floor is taught to be constructed to bear significant weight. E.g. Jackson's deflector and nozzle barrel are taught to be constructed to be able to bear heavy loads placed on them and their grating by aircraft or the like passing over the floor. Jackson has proved his design's utility by testing.
The Jackson fixed trench nozzle with weight-bearing design, however, provides no adjustable gap, or adjustable K factor, for the nozzle. Removing the nozzle barrel from the trench leaves the grating no longer flush with the floor, providing a personnel hazard. The weight-bearing requirement itself is a significant restriction on design.
The instant inventors determined to develop an alternate trench nozzle to the Jackson design without the full weight bearing requirement of the Jackson system while retaining a 360° predominantly lateral discharge capability, as appropriate for aircraft hangars, if desired. An adjustable gap on K factor and permanently flush grating were also design objectives.
As a result, the instant inventors developed and successfully tested a trench nozzle system able to be permanently stationed at optimum locations in trenches, providing a grating flush with the floor when the nozzle barrel is removed and providing a capability of discharging foam essentially laterally, if desired, and in 360°. At least the nozzle barrel is attached to the grating in a non-weight bearing fashion. In a preferred embodiment a bafflehead is also attached in a non-weight bearing fashion. The design permits providing the nozzle with an adjustable K factor, or adjustable gap, and permits the removal of the nozzle barrel from the trench without destroying the flushness of the floor grating. The design provides an annular discharge in lieu of a plurality of solid bore discharges.
The inventors were required to test their design to prove that the design could perform satisfactorily, including discharging essentially laterally and in 360° and with a requisite range. The ultimate testing provided favorable results.
To summarize the inventors perceived three disadvantages with the Jackson system. (1) The Jackson nozzle barrel must be constructed of significant weight-bearing, compression-bearing materials, without regard to more appropriate materials for constructing nozzle barrels and possibly baffleheads. (2) The Jackson nozzle barrel could not be removed from the trench without disturbing the flushness of the floor grating, a safety factor. (3) The K factor of the Jackson nozzle could not be adjusted.
The inventors' tests indicate that the new nozzle design could achieve essentially lateral radial patterns, as required for delivering fire suppressant to a floor area of an aircraft hangar without discharging at a height that impermissibly impinges upon aircraft itself. Further, a variety of discharge patterns could be achieved, depending upon the particular equipment in an industrial facility to be protected. As a further advantage, the nozzle barrel at least, and preferably a bafflehead also, could be constructed of appropriate material without regard to high compression weight-bearing restrictions. The nozzle discharge pattern could be adjusted by adjusting a stream shaper and/or by adjusting the bafflehead—barrel gap, the nozzle K factor, and/or by designing grating portions and/or bafflehead ports for shaping the nozzle discharge. The nozzle barrel could be removed from the trench without affecting the flushness of the grating and floor.
The instant design diverges significantly from the Jackson design in two structural features. (In the following use of the term “nozzle” will be understood to include all significantly attached fluid conduit defining structure beginning with the nozzle barrel, and will be understood to include not only the nozzle barrel but also any attached bafflehead and/or significant deflector structure and/or stream shaper structure. The nozzle defines a discharge stream and has a discharge end. The “nozzle gap” will be understood to be defined by nozzle structure and to be located at the point in the nozzle creating the greatest restriction on the fluid flow path. The nozzle gap defines a gap discharge stream. The nozzle gap set nozzle discharge pressure and affects range and nozzle flow rate.) Jackson teaches two nozzle embodiments, that of
By contrast, the instant nozzle structure and design defines an annular discharge stream. The gap defines an annular discharge stream. Jackson's “gap”, as determined by his figures above, and as compared to other “solid bore” nozzles, is located essentially at the nozzle discharge point. The instant gap by contrast, is located significantly upstream of the nozzle discharge point, located within a fluid conduit defined by the nozzle that is substantially vertical.
To summarize, the Jackson “hangar nozzles,” in particular the nozzle barrels themselves, are designed to bear weight, like the grating, and significant weight is known to pass on and over industrial floor grating. (In the Jackson design a weight bearing deflector is rested directly on a nozzle barrel flange, which in turn rests directly on the grating. The deflector and barrel flange bear weight.) Structuring a nozzle barrel to bear weight limits nozzle barrel flexibility and materials. The nozzle barrel of the instant design is structured together with the grating such that the nozzle barrel, and preferably a bafflehead, essentially bear no weight from objects passing over. Any bafflehead portion or deflector portion of the instant design that bears weight is designed to be part of the grating and does not bear down upon or rest upon the nozzle barrel. Weight passing over the grating is borne by the grating, thus, not a portion of the nozzle barrel. The design further provides the flexibility of being vertically adjustable in at least one sense, so as to be able at least to vary the nozzle K factor. With the instant design the nozzle barrel can be removed from the trench without disturbing the flush surface of the grating.
The instant floor nozzle system further preferably provides an annular discharge stream and an annular “gap” discharge stream, with the gap located significantly upstream of the nozzle discharge point. Preferably the gap is located where the fluid conduit defined by the nozzle is still substantially vertical. In applicant's experience such design characteristics enhance the performance and flexibility of the nozzle. The instant system preferably provides for adjusting the discharge gap of the nozzle and hence the discharge pressure and flow rate of the nozzle. Embodiments of the instant floor nozzle design also preferably provide for ease of removing the nozzle barrel permanently from the trench for repair or replacement while allowing grating and deflectors and caps to remain flush and in place, thus while continuing to provide a flush floor which creates no open personnel hazards.
It is anticipated that the shape of the discharge of the instant industrial floor nozzles, including grating portions, will be tailored by nozzle/grating structure and/or bafflehead structure to specifically cover specified equipment and/or walkways, such as by discharging directly up onto the equipment or by discharging at a 45 degree angle or by discharging laterally, and/or by including combinations of the above.
The gratings of the instant floor fire fighting nozzle system lie over trenches that provide stations for the nozzles and associated supply piping as well as a means for drainage. The nozzles and their associated piping are installed in the trenches. The instant system, in contrast to the Jackson system, is preferably designed such that while the gratings carry the weight of industrial equipment on, or passing over, the gratings, the nozzle barrels at least are attached to the gratings in a manner such that the barrels do not bear such weight. In a preferred embodiment a bafflehead is also designed without weight-bearing structure.
The instant floor nozzle discharges through a port or opening of the grating and portions of the grating may function as discharge shaping or discharge inhibiting or deflecting surfaces. The instant floor nozzle preferably includes a dislodgeable protective cap, resting on the grating over a nozzle barrel, to protect the nozzle from debris. The cap would be designed to blow off under water pressure.
The invention includes an industrial floor fire fighting system comprising a grating structured to fit over a trench in the floor, the grating defining an opening for fire fighting fluid discharge. The system includes a fire fighting nozzle attached to the grating, located to discharge fire fighting fluid through the opening, the nozzle having a barrel extending into the opening and a bafflehead. The barrel and the bafflehead are structured in combination to define an adjustable discharge gap.
Preferably the system includes the barrel and grating structured in combination such that the barrel bears essentially no weight from industrial objects on, or passing over when the grating is fitted over the trench. Preferably the system includes the nozzle structured to define an annular discharge stream and the gap structured to define an annular gap discharge. Preferably the system includes the nozzle and grating structured in combination to discharge fire fighting fluid substantially lateral.
Preferably the system includes the barrel and bafflehead structured in combination to define a gap significantly upstream of the nozzle discharge point. The system preferably includes the gap located in the fluid conduit defined by the nozzle where the fluid conduit is substantially vertical. Preferably the system includes the barrel vertically adjustably attached to the grating through an adjustable connection fitting. Preferably the system includes the grating opening including a dished area and a removable deflector plate portion extending over portions of the dished area. Preferably the system includes the dished area and/or removable plate portions structured to facilitate a nozzle discharge pattern. Preferably the system includes an internal stream straightener upstream of the discharge gap in the nozzle barrel.
In some embodiments the system includes the bafflehead attached to the grating. In those embodiments the barrel is preferably vertically adjustably attached to the grating through a connection fitting such that the adjustment of the barrel with respect to the fitting adjusts the discharge gap between the barrel and the bafflehead. In those embodiments the system preferably includes the bafflehead attached to a part of a removable plate portion of the grating. In those embodiments the system preferably includes the moveable plate portion of the grating being structured to shape interior portions of an annular discharge stream produced by the defined gap.
In other embodiments the system includes the bafflehead attached to the barrel and separated from the grating. In those embodiments the system preferably includes the barrel vertically adjustably attached to the grating by an adjustable stream shaper and mounting ring, and wherein the barrel vertically adjusts with respect to the stream shaper so as to adjust the discharge orifice of the nozzle. In those embodiments the system preferably includes the bafflehead adjustably attached to the barrel and attached such that adjustment of the bafflehead adjusts the discharge gap of the nozzle. In those embodiments the system preferably includes a blow off cap resting on a grating portion over the nozzle barrel. In those embodiments the system preferably includes the bafflehead structured to provide at least one port through the bafflehead for discharge through the bafflehead and preferably the at least one discharge port for the bafflehead being designed to create a specific discharge pattern for protecting equipment.
The invention preferably includes a method of fire fighting comprising installing fire fighting nozzles associated with gratings and trenches such that nozzle barrels essentially bear no weight passing over or on the gratings and adjusting a discharge gap of the nozzles such that the nozzle discharges through the gratings achieve a predetermined pattern or objective.
A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained when the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments are considered in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
The drawings are primarily illustrative. It would be understood that structure may have been simplified and details omitted in order to convey certain aspects of the invention. Scale may be sacrificed to clarity.
The embodiments of
A source of firefighting fluid is carried through piping in a trench, not shown, located under the floor grating, to the nozzle barrel NB. A hose or line couples to the nozzle body at a line coupler on the nozzle barrel, in a manner known to the art.
The bafflehead BG and the floor grating G in combination direct firefighting fluid in an annular path through and from the nozzle barrel. In the preferred embodiment illustrated the fluid is directed predominantly laterally in its discharge. A design objective for an aircraft hangar is to direct fire fighting foam discharge 20 feet radially with the foam rising no more than a foot or two vertically from the floor. The purpose of such distribution pattern is to protect equipment standing on the floor while addressing the fire hazard.
The floor grating, including the bafflehead unit of
Drainage ports DH are provided in the grating in general and in particular under the bafflehead. If the annular discharge area around the bafflehead is obstructed, as by a vehicle tire for instance, fluid should still pass through the nozzle and back through the grating through drainage ports DH under the bafflehead into the trench, thereby avoiding a significant effect on supply pressure.
Preferably a spacing S and gap GP between the nozzle barrel and the bafflehead are adjustable, as by a height adjustment ring HAR, in order to be able to adjust the k-factor of the nozzle. Alternately, the spacing could be bias controlled to regulate pressure. An adjustable screw connection between ring HAR and nozzle barrel NB is illustrated.
In all embodiments it is preferred for a portion of the grating to be removable in order to provide access from the top to the nozzle and associated lines.
Stream straightener SS, especially
Bafflehead BG could be molded and produced in one piece with grating G. However, in the aircraft hangar embodiment, users explicitly wish to be able to remove any covering over the nozzle body and access the equipment below the grating therethrough. Hence the bafflehead is part of the grating but can be constructed in the order of a removable manhole cover.
Nozzle barrel NB, as more clearly disclosed in
One additional function of the lugs LG and the lug holes LGH on the bafflehead and grating respectively is to help the bafflehead resist torque forces or rotation or twisting.
In two locations the bafflehead will form a screwed connection with holes SH of the landings L as illustrated in
In operation in one preferred embodiment the nozzle body is supported by the height adjustment ring HAR. The nozzle body does not rest upon any portion of the grating. Further, the nozzle body does not touch at any place the bafflehead portion of the grating.
As illustrated in
Alternate
In
Grating G is designed to rest upon and fit over a trench in an industrial floor. The grating is designed to fit substantially flush with the floor and to bear the weight of objects passing over the trench and grating.
A grating is preferably comprised of cast iron or the like and is of a substantial thickness, in order to bear substantial weight.
Viewing
The second preferred drain nozzle embodiment is designed for the nozzle to discharge in a variety of directions, including in particular, directly vertical, substantially vertical, in 45 degree angles from the vertical, and the like, and including interior straight bore discharges inside of an annular discharge.
In addition to a grating G, the second preferred drain nozzle embodiment includes a stream shaper/mounting ring unit SS/MR, a nozzle barrel NB, a center tube support unit CTS, a center tube unit CT, a bafflehead unit BH, a top plate unit TP and a standby cap unit CP.
The stream shaper/mounting ring SS/MR is structured to affix to the bottom of the grating below and around port or opening NO provided to accommodate a nozzle barrel. The nozzle barrel is preferably designed to adjustably attach to the stream shaper/mounting ring, as by a threaded attachment. The adjustable attachment provides means for adjusting the vertical height of the nozzle body, and any bafflehead attachment, in order to permit the stream shaper to shape a portion of the discharge stream.
The center tube support unit CTS is preferably supported on the nozzle barrel (by means not shown) at or along lower portions of the nozzle barrel. The center tube CT is preferably designed to adjustably attach to the center tube support, as by threaded attachment. A bafflehead BH maybe designed to further adjustably attach to the center tube as by threaded attachment. The adjustable attachment permits adjusting the nozzle gap, GP, or K factor.
The top plate TP fits above and around the nozzle body port or opening NO in and on the grating. The top plate TP attaches directly to the grating, such as to the support ledges L of the grating. The top plate TP is part of the grating, although it is removable in order to provide access to the port or opening in the grating and to the nozzle body and parts thereof and to the trench below. A standby cap CP preferably drops into and rests on the grating in the center of top plate TP. The standby cap rests lightly in the center such that fluid pressure from a nozzle below blows the standby cap off.
The cross-sectional views of the second preferred embodiment assembly clarify the relationships between the grating, the top plate, the standby cap, the bafflehead, the center tube, the center tube support and the nozzle barrel of the preferred embodiment. (Note again that the support for the center tube support in or on the nozzle body has not been indicated. It is possible that the center tube support would be allowed to adjust vertically a small distance within the nozzle body, such as ⅛ of an inch.)
Note that as shown in
The nozzle barrel again is preferably designed to adjustably attach to the stream shaper/mounting ring. A preferred means for an adjustable attachment would be a threaded attachment between the stream shaper mounting ring and nozzle barrel. It is preferred that the center tube will have a vertically adjustable attachment to the center tube support, such as a threaded attachment. Even further, the bafflehead preferably has a vertically adjustable threaded attachment to the center tube support. Vertical adjustment permits adjusting of the flow and the range to be achieved by the nozzle as well as the vertical relationship of the nozzle and the grating. If the center tube support and thus the center tube were to vertically adjust as a result of fluid pressure, one configuration may have the bafflehead resting on the nozzle body when not in use. By such means debris can be also further prevented from falling through the nozzle body.
The stream shaper/mounting ring also preferably provides its own additional drain holes to drain away water and debris from the nozzle. Again, the standby cap is designed to rest upon the top of the grating or grating portion and to be blown away by the pressure of fluid flowing upwards through the nozzle.
The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the invention is presented for purposes of illustration and description, and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form or embodiment disclosed. The description was selected to best explain the principles of the invention and their practical application to enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments. Various modifications as are best suited to the particular use are contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention is not to be limited by the specification, but to be defined by the claims set forth below. Since the foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are illustrative and explanatory thereof, various changes in the size, shape, and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrated device may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. The invention is claimed using terminology that depends upon a historic presumption that recitation of a single element covers one or more, and recitation of two elements covers two or more, and the like. Also, the drawings and illustration herein have not necessarily been produced to scale.
This invention is related to and claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 61/340,400, filed Mar. 17, 2010, entitled Industrial Floor Nozzle and Fire Fighting System having inventors Thomas E. Mason, Dwight P. Williams and Casey R. Spears; and to co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/925,037, of which this application is a continuation in part, filed Oct. 12, 2010, entitled Improved Drain Nozzle, inventor Thomas E. Mason, and to its related provisional application Ser. No. 61/228,877 of same title and same inventor. The contents of provisional application No. 61/340,400 and of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/925,037 are herein hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/000478 | 3/15/2011 | WO | 00 | 9/5/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/115673 | 9/22/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1962824 | Lindquist et al. | Jun 1934 | A |
3408006 | Stanwood | Oct 1968 | A |
6126083 | Boschung et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6182767 | Jackson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6755356 | Bergquist | Jun 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130000928 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61340400 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12925037 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13261425 | US |