Patent Grant
7706947
This application claims priority to German Application No. 10 2004 017 056.8 filed Apr. 7, 2004, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an industrial truck, in particular a forward-control counterweight fork-lift truck, having a liftable and tiltable load-lifting device, a traction drive, and operating drives for movement of the load-lifting device.
2. Technical Considerations
In the case of conventional industrial trucks, the operator has to estimate the weight of the load goods to be lifted (lifting load) and the height to which the load goods are to be lifted (lifting height). On the basis of this, the driving speed and the turning radius of the industrial truck must be set such that there is no tipping of the industrial truck to the front or to the side. Although this demanding task must be managed in a static or quasi-static operating range, i.e., an operating range having a relatively low driving speed, it is easily possible for this to be too much for the operator. When the load-bearing capacity of the industrial truck is exceeded or in the event of driving maneuvers which are not adapted to the current lifting load and lifting height, there is the risk of tipping accidents involving severe injury or death to the operator or nearby people, associated with a high level of damage to property. There has, therefore, been no shortage of thought given to creating suitable safety precautions for preventing accidents involving industrial trucks.
DE 29 09 667 C3, for example, has described a generic industrial truck providing intervention in the traction drive depending on the steering angle, the lifting height, and the load torque, and, in the process, the driving speed and, if necessary, also the (electromotive) braking deceleration are limited. This takes place by overriding the desired values predetermined by the operator, using correction signals from the control device.
The subject matter of EP 0 343 839 B1 is an industrial truck in which the driving speed is limited depending on the lifting load, the lifting height, the steering angle, and the direction of travel or the position of the center of gravity of the vehicle. In addition, provision is also made for limiting the acceleration of the industrial truck depending on the lifting height.
EP 1 078 878 A1 discloses the concept of limiting the tilting speed of an industrial-truck lifting mast depending on the lifting load and the lifting height.
Finally, EP 1 019 315 B1 discloses an industrial truck in which the driving speed is limited depending on the lifting load and the tilting angle, and a higher lowering speed without a load is made possible.
The present invention is based on the object of providing an industrial truck of the general type mentioned above but having further improved tipping stability.
This object is achieved according to the invention by a calculation model, which is based on vehicle-specific information, for the static and/or quasi-static tipping behavior of the industrial truck being stored in a control device, to which directly or indirectly acting sensors are connected for the purpose of detecting the lifting load, the lifting height, the tilting angle, the load torque, the direction of travel, the driving speed, and the steering angle. The control device is designed to determine a driving and load state which is based on the detected physical variables and the stored calculation model and being operatively connected to the traction drive and the operating drives such that, depending on the driving and load state determined, the operating speed, starting and braking acceleration, and/or driving speed, which can be achieved or are achieved, are each controlled, e.g., reduced.
The concept of the invention accordingly includes intervening, with the help of logic, which is implemented by a control device and monitors static and/or quasi-static tipping risks (given a high lifting height and lifting load when at a standstill or at a low driving speed), in the vehicle behavior to such an extent that the vehicle is prevented from tipping over. In the process, the control device has the effect of a limitation of the actual values which can be achieved or, in an extreme case, the effect of reducing the actual values already achieved as regards the operating speed, the starting and braking acceleration, and/or the driving speed.
This can be achieved, for example, by reducing the desired values predetermined by the operator (overriding the desired values predetermined by the operator by corrections from the control device). This reduces the actual values (“which can be achieved”) which correspond thereto during normal operation if control levers or other operating members are deflected in a certain way. In the individual case, this may mean, for example, that, when the industrial truck is at a standstill, the operator wishes to tilt the lifted load forward at a specific speed by actuating a control lever but the tilting speed is reduced to zero by the control device owing to an impermissibly high risk of tipping, i.e., the forward tilting movement is completely prevented. However, it is also possible to reduce already existing (“achieved”) actual values by using the control device. Example: When an industrial truck is starting to reverse, the operator wishes to lift the load. The control device allows the lifting -operation (possibly at a reduced lifting speed) but reduces the starting acceleration and/or driving speed already achieved.
The operating speed of the load-lifting device is primarily understood to mean, in the context of the invention, the lifting and tilting speed. The lowering speed is also preferably included. Of course, further movements of the load-lifting device may also be taken into consideration, for example the movement of a side loader or a pivoting apparatus.
Some of the sensors provided for implementing the invention (for example the tilting angle sensor, the lifting height sensor) are frequently already provided in generic industrial trucks as standard or special equipment, with the result that the expenditure required for implementing the invention is relatively low. This also applies to the signal paths between the control device and the drive systems of the industrial truck.
The tilting angle sensor can, depending on the embodiment of the industrial truck, detect the tilting angle of the lifting mast or, given a fixed lifting mast, the tilting angle of the height-adjustable load carriage on the lifting mast. The steering speed can also be derived from the signal from the steering angle sensor.
The extensive sensor system, which is overall provided, makes possible detection from far more operating points than is the case with individual solutions, which are known from the current art.
With the industrial truck designed according to the invention, primarily tipping accidents are prevented which result from excessively large, rapid, or abrupt adjustment commands by the operator.
In accordance with one advantageous development of the invention, the priority is the reduction in the starting and braking acceleration and driving speed which can be achieved or are achieved. This is based on the consideration that, in the range of static and/or quasi-static tipping, it is mainly the operating drive of the load-lifting device which is used and it is, therefore, more favorable to influence the traction drive so as to increase the tipping stability.
The vehicle-specific information stored in the control device at least expediently comprises data on the dimensions and the weights of the industrial truck and the load-lifting device (lifting mast) and on the maximum load.
In a further refinement of the invention, the driving and load state is determined, using the vehicle-specific information available and the physical variables detected by the sensors, in the control device, at least the following driving maneuvers which are critical to tipping being monitored to ascertain whether interventions are required: braking whilst travelling forward with the vehicle being inclined forward, accelerating whilst reversing with the vehicle being inclined forward, braking out of reverse travel on a bend with the vehicle being inclined perpendicular to the tipping axis, and accelerating forward on a bend with the vehicle being inclined perpendicular to the tipping axis.
The term “vehicle being inclined” shall include a relatively small inclination of the vehicle with reference to the plane. A vehicle is inclined if the vehicle is located on a slope (gradient, e.g., less than 3%).
Further advantages and details of the invention are explained in more detail with reference to the exemplary embodiment illustrated in the schematic figures, in which like reference numbers identify like parts throughout.
The industrial truck shown in
The lifting mast la can be tilted about a horizontal axis arranged transversely in the lower region. Of course, it is also possible for a rigid, i.e., non-tiltable, lifting mast to be provided and, instead, the load carriage to be designed such that it is not only height-adjustable but is also tiltable, as is often the case, for example, with so-called warehousing devices (for example reach trucks). Other load-receiving devices may also be fixed to the load carriage 1b, depending on the intended use. It goes without saying that, in principle, additional movements of the load-lifting device are also possible as long as the devices required for this purpose, for example a side loader, are available.
The lifting mast 1a can be tilted by means of hydraulic tilting cylinders 1d. The lifting mast 1a is extended and the load carriage 1b lifted by means of hydraulic lifting cylinders, possibly additionally having one or more load chains. The dead weight of the load carriage 1b and the components of the lifting mast 1a which are extended upwards and, if necessary, the weight of the load goods serve to lower the load carriage 1b or to retract the lifting mast 1a. These hydraulic consumers are fed by a hydraulic pump. Together with the hydraulic valves required and a motor driving the pump, this system thus comprises a plurality of operating drives for the lifting, lowering, and tilting movement of the load-lifting device.
The fork-lift truck in accordance with the exemplary embodiment also has a traction drive, in which a front axle 2 is in the form of a drive axle, and a steering drive, with the aid of which a steering axle 3 arranged at the rear is actuated.
The fork-lift truck is equipped with sensors S, with the aid of which physical variables can be detected from which the driving and load state Z can be determined objectively with respect to static and quasi-static tipping risks. These variables can include the lifting load L, the lifting height H, the load torque M, the mast tilting angle WM, the steering angle WL applied to the steering axle, the direction of travel R, and the driving speed V. For example, the tilting cylinder forces or the axle load on the steering axle 3 can be used to determine the load torque M. The lifting load L can be determined from the lifting cylinder forces.
The measured values detected by the sensors S are passed on to a control device SE in which, on the basis of vehicle-specific data, such as the dimensions and weights of the industrial truck and of the lifting mast and the maximum possible load, a calculation model D for the fork-lift truck is stored.
In the control device SE, the current driving and load state Z of the industrial truck is determined in a driving-state observer FB from the calculation model D and the measured values from the sensors S, and, in the process, it is established whether the operating and/or driving movements are critical to tipping and therefore make interventions necessary.
In this case, critical driving maneuvers FM are monitored by the driving-state observer FB, in particular the following driving maneuvers: braking whilst travelling forward with the vehicle being inclined forward, accelerating whilst reversing with the vehicle being inclined forward, braking out of reverse travel on a bend with the vehicle being inclined perpendicular to the tipping axis, and accelerating forward on a bend with the vehicle being inclined perpendicular to the tipping axis.
From this it is possible to derive the interventions E in the traction drive and the operating drive which may be necessary and which lead to the tipping limits not being reached or being exceeded. The control device SE thus has the effect of increasing the tipping stability.
The interventions carried out are interventions (for example, reduction of the driving and operating speed), with which, in each case, one or more of the inputs P by the operator are corrected (connection K1), for example by overriding the desired values. They may also be interventions, by means of which the inputs P are influenced at the time they are produced (arrow K2), for example an increased operating resistance.
The state diagram illustrated in
Operating range I represents that static or quasi-static range in which the risk of tipping accidents is at its lowest. It is, therefore, not necessary in operating range I for the control device to intervene so as to increase the tipping stability.
In operating range II, i.e., the range having the high lifting height but, as previously, low driving speed or at a standstill, there is the risk of static or quasi-static tipping, depending, inter alia, on the lifting load and the load torque. In this operating range II, the control device therefore has an effect which, depending on the driving and load state determined, reduces the operating speed of the load-lifting device, starting and braking acceleration, and driving speed of the industrial truck, which can be achieved or are achieved. In the process, excessively large, rapid, or abrupt adjustment commands by the operator are overridden and, as a result, the tipping stability is increased.
In this case, the degree and the extent of the intervention may depend on whether only driving maneuvers when travelling straight ahead are present, i.e., no or only a small steering angle (or no or only a low steering speed) is detected, or quasi-static cornering is present in the case of which, for example, a steering angle of more than 5 degrees is detected or the steering speed exceeds a determined value.
It will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the concepts disclosed in the foregoing description. Accordingly, the particular embodiments described in detail herein are illustrative only and are not limiting to the scope of the invention, which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2004 017 056 | Apr 2004 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4068773 | Downing et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4168934 | Downing et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4354568 | Griesenbrock | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4411582 | Nakada | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4511974 | Nakane et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4520443 | Yuki et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4634332 | Kamide et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4828066 | Hayashi | May 1989 | A |
| 4869635 | Krahn | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4942529 | Avitan et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5011358 | Andersen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5088879 | Ranly | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5131801 | Melanson | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5224815 | Abels et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5509293 | Karumanchi | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5687081 | Wellman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5730305 | Ichiba et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5738187 | Dammeyer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749696 | Johnson | May 1998 | A |
| 5906648 | Zoratti et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5929388 | Uehara et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5938710 | Lanza et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947516 | Ishikawa | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955706 | Fonkalsrud et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5995001 | Wellman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6050770 | Avitan | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6056501 | Ishikawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6082742 | Ishikawa | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6135694 | Trego et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6164415 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6185489 | Strickler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6202410 | Nakashima | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209913 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6240353 | Ishikawa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| RE37215 | Dammeyer et al. | Jun 2001 | E |
| 6266594 | Ishikawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6350100 | Naruse et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6425728 | Goto | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6552279 | Lueschow et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6611746 | Nagai | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6719098 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6721680 | Sorrells et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6785597 | Farber et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6854552 | Yurushi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6985795 | Scotese | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7014054 | Yahiaoui et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7026557 | Rice et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7138925 | Nield | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7216024 | Abels et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 20010056319 | Rocke | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20030111652 | Hoffend, Jr. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030205418 | Enmeiji et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040083025 | Yamanouchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098146 | Katae et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249538 | Osaki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050102081 | Patterson | May 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 29 09 667 | Sep 1980 | DE |
| 0 343 839 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 1 078 878 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 1 019 315 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050281656 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
