1. Technical Field
Aspects and embodiments of the present invention are generally directed to inert materials and apparatus which simulate the look, feel, and/or X-ray response of explosive materials or devices such as improvised explosive devices (IEDs) or other potentially harmful devices. The inert materials and apparatus may be utilized for training of persons to identify actual harmful devices or testing X-ray devices and other instruments.
2. Discussion of Related Art
In numerous locations, most notably airports and other transportation hubs, packages, for example, passenger luggage may be screened for the presence of explosives, improvised explosive devices, or other potentially harmful devices. The screening process is often accomplished by the use of X-ray scanners. X-ray scanners may identify explosive materials by the density of the material and/or the effective atomic number (Zeff).
The two mechanisms primarily responsible for X-Ray attenuation at the energy levels typically utilized by explosive detection equipment are photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering. The photoelectric effect attenuates X-Ray transmission by absorption of incident X-Ray photons and resultant emission of a photoelectron and corresponding X-Ray. Compton scattering attenuates X-Ray transmission by inelastic scattering of incident X-Ray photons, resulting in a recoil electron and an emitted photon with lower energy. The attenuation of transmitted X-Rays is dominated by the photoelectric effect for elements with high atomic numbers whereas the attenuation by Compton scattering is dominant for elements with lower atomic numbers.
Compared to the photoelectric effect, the attenuation due to Compton scattering is relatively invariant with respect to incident X-Ray energy. Thus, detectors utilizing multi-energy X-Rays can distinguish materials of different atomic numbers based on the relative contributions of Compton scattering and photoelectric absorption on the overall absorption. Additional information about the density of the material may be inferred from the absorption of the high energy photons. In contrast with lower energy X-Rays, the absorption of high energy X-Rays are primarily due to Compton scattering which is roughly proportional to mass per cross sectional area. Algorithms may be put in place to automatically discriminate between materials which share characteristics (effective atomic number and density) with explosive materials and those that do not, thereby aiding in the detection. These X-ray scanners may sound an alarm or otherwise provide an indication of the suspected explosive material so that a trained agent may make a further investigation and respond accordingly. The X-ray scanners may identify different suspected explosive materials by different colors on a display.
In accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a simulated explosive material. The simulated explosive material comprises or consists of one or more inert components that has a density and effective atomic number (Zeff) substantially similar to an explosive material. The simulated explosive material is configured to produce an output signal consistent with the presence of the explosive material when scanned in an X-ray scanner.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include brown sugar.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include a mixture of brown sugar and one or more of corn syrup, baking soda, water, or oil. The simulated explosive material may be configured to produce an output signal consistent with the presence of dynamite when scanned in an X-ray scanner.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include a mixture of confectioner sugar and one or more of corn starch or corn syrup. The simulated explosive material may be configured to produce an output signal consistent with the presence of one of dynamite or PE-4 when scanned in an X-ray scanner.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include a mixture of baking soda and one or more of corn syrup, corn starch, water, oil, or paraffin wax. The simulated explosive material may be configured to produce an output signal consistent with the presence of one of Semtex, C-4, TNT, or a plastic explosive when scanned in an X-ray scanner.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include a mixture of corn starch, baking soda, water, and oil. The simulated explosive material may be configured to produce an output signal consistent with the presence of a plastic explosive when scanned in an X-ray scanner.
The simulated explosive material may be configured to produce an output signal consistent with the presence of one of PE-4, TNT, nitroglycerine, or C-4 when scanned in an X-ray scanner.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include cane sugar.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include one of black sand or charcoal.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include a mixture of polymeric materials of varying molecular weights. These materials may include but are not limited to polyethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, polydimethylsiloxane, polyvinylchloride and, polyvinyl acetate. The simulated explosive material may be configured to produce an output signal consistent with the presence of a variety of explosives when scanned in an X-Ray scanner.
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include a mixture of glycerin, corn starch, alumina, hydrogen peroxide. In some embodiments, the one or more inert components further includes a colorant, for example food coloring or paint. In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include a mixture of water, charcoal, sodium chloride (NaCl) and calcium chloride (CaCl2).
In some embodiments, the one or more inert components include a mixture of oxides and/or nitrides. These materials may include but are not limited to Boron Oxide, Aluminum Oxide, Silicon Oxide, aluminosilicates, Boron Nitride, Carbon Nitride, and/or other organic or inorganic ceramic materials. The simulated explosive material may be configured to produce an output signal consistent with the presence of a variety of explosives when scanned in an X-Ray scanner.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a simulated IED Circuit Kit. The simulated IED circuit Kit comprises an explosive simulant comprising or consisting of one or more inert components and having a density and/or Zeff substantially similar to an explosive material, a simulated blasting cap adjacent to the explosive simulant, a trigger switch, and a power source.
In some embodiments, the trigger switch includes one or more of a mousetrap switch, a clothespin switch, a wireless doorbell receiver, a vibration switch, a reed switch, a dummy cell phone, a two-way radio, a cordless telephone, a passive infrared receiver, a pair of saw blades, a pressure activated micro switch, a tilt switch, a mercury switch, a digital clock, a mechanical clock, a kitchen timer, a servo motor, a temperature switch, a photo cell, or a wire loop switch.
In some embodiments, the explosive simulant includes one of a mixture of brown sugar and one or more of corn syrup, baking soda, water, and oil, a mixture of baking soda and one or more of corn syrup, corn starch, water, oil, and paraffin wax, a mixture of confectioner sugar and one or more of corn starch and corn syrup, a mixture of glycerin, corn starch, alumina, and hydrogen peroxide, a mixture of corn starch, baking soda, water, and oil, and a mixture corn starch, water, and oil.
In some embodiments, the explosive simulant includes one of brown sugar and cane sugar.
In some embodiments, the explosive simulant includes one of black sand or charcoal.
In some embodiments, the simulated IED Circuit Kit further comprises an arming switch in electrical communication between the power source and the simulated blasting cap.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a simulated blasting cap. The simulated blasting cap comprises a tube and an explosive simulant disposed within the tube. The explosive simulant comprises or consists of one or more inert components having a density and/or Zeff substantially similar to an explosive material. The simulated blasting cap further comprises a bridge wire disposed within the tube.
In some embodiments, the explosive simulant may include a wooden dowel or a polymer, such as PTFE, rod.
In some embodiments, the simulated blasting cap further comprises a metal sleeve disposed within the tube.
In some embodiments, the simulated blasting cap further comprises a lead wire disposed within the tube.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a Threat Screening Kit. The Threat Screening Kit comprises a simulated blasting cap including an explosive simulant, a power source, and a trigger mechanism in electrical communication between the simulated blasting cap and the power source.
In some embodiments, the simulated blasting cap includes a metal sleeve disposed within a tube.
In some embodiments, the simulated blasting cap includes a lead wire disposed within a tube.
In some embodiments, the trigger mechanism includes one or more of a mousetrap switch, a clothespin switch, a wireless doorbell receiver, a vibration switch, a reed switch, a cell phone dummy, a two-way radio, a cordless telephone, a passive infrared receiver, a pair of saw blades, a pressure activated micro switch, a tilt switch, a mercury switch, a digital clock, a mechanical clock, a kitchen timer, a servo motor, a temperature switch, a photo cell, and a wire loop switch.
The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
Aspects and embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof.
It has been discovered that many explosive materials may be simulated by one or more non-explosive and inert materials or mixtures thereof, which in some instances may be sufficiently harmless to not require a material safety data sheet (MSDS) when provided by a supplier to a customer. These inert material mixtures may have densities and/or Zeff sufficiently close to the explosive material which they simulate so that an X-ray scanner may produce an output signal consistent with the presence of the simulated explosive material when scanning the inert material. Many X-ray scanners provide a standardized set of colors categorizing materials of different effective atomic numbers. The inert materials may be designed to cause an X-ray scanner to classify the inert material mixtures with the same colors as the explosive materials which they are intended to simulate. The inert material mixtures may also be used to simulate explosive materials in other forms of scanners, for example, backscattering or computed tomography scanner systems. These inert material mixtures may also be colored, for example, by the addition of food coloring, and textured in a similar manner as the explosive material which they are intended to simulate. Examples of various inert materials and material mixtures and the explosive materials which they may simulate are listed in Table 1 below:
Table 1 lists the densities and effective atomic numbers of various explosive materials with the corresponding abbreviations and various products using these materials. Examples of inert materials and inert material mixtures which may be used to simulate the explosive materials, for example, by closely matching their densities and/or effective atomic numbers (Zeff) are listed in the rightmost column. In some embodiments, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) may be included as an additional ingredient in one or more of the formulations listed above. The BHT may function as a preservative for the materials included in one or more of the formulations listed above. Further, coloring agents, for example, food coloring, may be added to various of the formulations listed above so that the inert materials and/or inert material mixtures may closely match both the look and feel of an explosive material which they are intended to mimic.
Zeff may be calculated according to the formula
where Zi is the atomic number of element i, αi is the fraction of the total electrons contained by element i and n is a weighting factor equal to, for example, 3.9. Some references may utilize slightly different values of n when calculating Zeff for a material or may use a different formula.
A number of simulant mixtures may be prepared. These mixtures may be packaged in cardboard tubes, plastic tubes, vacuum sealed plastic film, or other packages. The densities of the simulant mixtures were measured and types of explosive for which the simulant mixtures would be useful in simulating were identified.
Mix 1A:
Dark brown sugar (e.g. Domino™ Dark Brown Sugar)
Density of mixture: 1.0 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “El Blasto” dynamite simulant.
Mix 1B:
Dark brown sugar (e.g. Domino™ Dark Brown Sugar): 900 g
Corn Syrup (e.g. Karo™ Red Label 16 oz. Light Syrup): 50 g
Density of mixture: 1.1 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “Ammonium Dynamite” simulant.
Mix 1C:
Dark brown sugar (e.g. Domino™ Dark Brown Sugar): 900 g
Corn Syrup (e.g. Karo™ Red Label 16 oz. Light Syrup): 100 g
Density of mixture: 1.2 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “Nitro Dynamite” simulant.
Mix 2:
Dark brown sugar (e.g. Domino™ Dark Brown Sugar): 900 g
Corn Syrup (e.g. Karo™ Red Label 16 oz. Light Syrup): 100 g
Baking Soda: 150 g
Density of mixture: 1.3 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “Extra Gelatin” dynamite simulant.
Mix 3:
Confectioner sugar (e.g. Domino™ Confectioner Sugar): 2 pounds
Corn syrup (e.g. Karo™ Red Label 16 oz. Light Syrup): 1.5 cups
Density of mixture: 1.5 g/cc
Density of mixture in plastic packaging: 1.5 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “M1 Military Dynamite” simulant.
Mix 4:
Water: 200 ml
Charcoal: 200 g
NaCl: 65 g
CaCl2: 35 g
This mixture is useful for simulating black powder.
Mix 5A:
Glycerine: 200 g
Corn starch: 200 g
Alumina: 140 g
Hydrogen peroxide: 80 g (Do not measure out, squirt directly from bottle into mixer)
Orange paint (for example, Oil based paint or pigments): 10 g
Density of mixture: 1.4 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “Semtex-H” simulant.
Mix 5B:
Glycerin: 200 g
Corn starch: 200 g
Alumina: 130 g
Hydrogen peroxide: 80 g (Do not measure out, squirt directly from bottle into mixer)
Black paint (for example, Oil based paint or pigments): 10 g
Density of mixture: 1.4 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “Semtex-10” simulant
Mix 5C:
Glycerin: 200 g
Corn starch: 200 g
Alumina: 120 g
Hydrogen peroxide: 80 g (Do not measure out, squirt directly from bottle into mixer)
Red paint (for example, Oil based paint or pigments): 10 g
Density of mixture: 1.4 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “Semtex-1A” simulant
Mix 6:
Glycerin: 200 g
Corn starch: 200 g
Alumina: 190 g
Hydrogen peroxide: 80 g (Do not measure out, squirt directly from bottle into mixer)
Density of mixture: 1.6 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “C4,” and “M112 C4” simulants.
Mix 7:
Baking Soda: 4.5 cups
Water: 1 tablespoon
Vegetable oil: 1 cup
Paraffin wax: 2 blocks (32 oz.)
20 drops yellow food coloring
Density of mixture: 1.5 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “Cast TNT” simulant.
Mix 8:
Baking Soda: 4.5 cups
Water: 1 tablespoon
Vegetable oil: 1 cup
Paraffin wax: 2 blocks (32 oz.)
20 drops yellow food coloring
Corn starch: 1.5 cups
Density of mixture: 1.48 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “PE 4” and “TNT Cast Booster” simulants.
Mix 9:
Baking Soda: 3 cups
Paraffin wax: 2 blocks (32 oz.)
Density of mixture: 1.48 g/cc
This mixture is useful for the “PE 4” and “TNT Cast Booster” simulants.
Mix 10:
Baking Soda: 2 cups
Corn Starch: 1 cup
Water: 1.5 cups
Vegetable oil: 1 tablespoon
Density of mixture: 1.40 g/cc
Packed in cardboard tube with eight inch length, 1.5 inch diameter, 0.08 inch wall thickness.
Density of mixture and cardboard tube: 1.57 g/cc
This mixture in the cardboard tube is useful for simulating plastic explosives.
Mix 11:
Baking soda: 2 cups
Corn starch: 2 cup
Water: 1 cup
Vegetable oil: 0.5 cup
Density of mixture: 1.5 g/cc
Packed in cardboard tube with eight inch length, 1.5 inch diameter, 0.08 inch wall thickness.
Density of mixture and cardboard tube: 1.6 g/cc
This mixture in the cardboard tube is useful for simulating plastic explosives.
Mix 12:
Confectioner sugar (e.g. Domino™ Confectioner Sugar): 2 cups
Corn syrup: 1 cup
Vegetable oil spray (to coat outside to reduce stickiness)
Density of mixture: 1.4 g/cc
Packed in cardboard tube with five inch length, 1.5 inch diameter, 0.08 inch wall thickness.
Density of mixture and cardboard tube: 1.5 g/cc
This mixture in the cardboard tube is useful for simulating PE-4 stick and sheet explosive.
Mix 13:
Corn Starch: 1 cup
Magnesium Citrate Powder: 2 cups
Baking soda: 0.25 cups
Water: 1.5 cups water
Vegetable Oil: 2 Tablespoons
Density of mixture: 1.20 g/cc
Packed in cardboard tube with eight inch length, 1.5 inch diameter, 0.08 inch wall thickness.
Density of mixture and cardboard tube: 1.33 g/cc
This mixture in the cardboard tube is useful for simulating plastic explosives.
Mix 14:
Dark brown sugar
Density of mixture: 0.86 g/cc
Packed in cardboard tube with eight inch length, 1.5 inch diameter, 0.08 inch wall thickness.
Density of compressed mixture and cardboard tube: 1.22 g/cc
Density of non-compressed mixture and cardboard tube: 1.15 g/cc
This mixture in the cardboard tube is useful for simulating dynamite
Mix 15:
Pure Cane sugar
Density of mixture: 0.74 g/cc
Packed in cardboard tube with eight inch length, 1.5 inch diameter, 0.08 inch wall thickness.
Density of compressed mixture and cardboard tube: 1.11 g/cc
Density of non-compressed mixture and cardboard tube: 1.04 g/cc
This mixture in the cardboard tube is useful for simulating dynamite.
Mix 16:
Dry Magnesium Citrate Powder
Density of mixture: 1.12 g/cc
Packed in cardboard tube with eight inch length, 1.5 inch diameter, 0.08 inch wall thickness.
Density of compressed mixture and cardboard tube: 1.12 g/cc
Density of non-compressed mixture and cardboard tube: 1.08 g/cc
This mixture in the cardboard tube is useful for simulating dynamite.
TATP Simulant:
Polyethylene Powder: 800 g
Granulated Cane Sugar: 400 g
99% Glycerin: 110 g
Borax: 200 g
HMTD Simulant:
Polyethylene Powder: 600 g
Baking Soda: 250 g
99% Glycerin: 81 g
Borax: 150 g
PETN Simulant:
Polyethylene Powder: 200 g
Granulated Cane Sugar: 600 g
99% Glycerin: 60 g
Borax: 575 g
Baking Soda: 50 g
RDX Simulant:
Polyethylene Powder: 50 g
Granulated Cane Sugar: 500 g
99% Glycerin: 60 g
Borax: 700 g
Baking Soda: 150 g
Hydrogen Peroxide (30%) Simulant:
75% Water
20% Cane Sugar
5% Sodium Chloride
Blue Highlighter Fluid
PLX Simulant:
62% Water
31% Cane Sugar
4% Sodium Chloride
2% Corn Syrup
The densities of various explosive simulating materials and mixtures may be adjusted to more closely conform to a density of a particular explosive. For example, when dark brown sugar or confectioner sugar is used in the simulant, the sugar may be compressed to a particular packing density needed to achieve a desired density in a container in which it is supplied. Mixtures of materials including water and oil may be adjusted in density by varying the amount of water versus oil or by using different oils. For example, a mixture of one cup corn starch, two cups baking soda, and one tablespoon vegetable oil will provide a mixture with a density of about 1.4 g/cc. By increasing the amount of oil by 0.5 cups and reducing the amount of water by 0.5 cups the density of the mixture may be increased to about 1.6 g/cc. Further variations of the oil and water mixtures can achieve varying densities in a range of from about 1.4 g/cc to about 1.6 g/cc. The corn starch/water/oil mixture may be formed from a mixture of 1.5 cups water, one cup corn starch and one tablespoon of vegetable oil to provide a density of about 1.6 g/cc. In another example, the density of the clay may be adjusted by adjusting its water content or by selecting different types of clay.
In some embodiments, the various explosive simulating materials and mixtures may be hermetically sealed in a package to reduce the potential for water vapor to enter or exit the material, which could alter its density. In some embodiments, the explosive simulating materials and mixtures may be vacuum sealed in a plastic film having a low water vapor transmission rate, for example, a polyester, polypropylene, or polychlorotrifluoroethylene (PCTFE) film. In some embodiments, the plastic film may be metalized to further reduce its water vapor transmission rate.
In accordance with a first broad aspect disclosed herein, one or more explosive simulants may be utilized in a simulated IED Circuit Kit. The components of an embodiment of a simulated IED Circuit Kit 100 are illustrated in
An explosive simulant 120 may be mounted on the substrate board 110. In some embodiments, the explosive simulant may be packaged inside a tube, for example, a cardboard tube 200 as illustrated in
Returning to
Examples of various embodiments of the simulated IED Circuit Kit 100 are illustrated in
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In accordance with another broad aspect disclosed herein, there is provided embodiments of simulated blasting caps. The simulated blasting caps are designed to look and feel substantially similar to actual “live” blasting caps and are constructed from materials which provide a substantially similar X-ray signature as actual “live” blasting caps.
In accordance with another broad aspect disclosed herein, there is provided embodiments of various Threat Screening Kits. The Threat Screening Kits are designed to mimic the look and feel of “live” explosive devices or components thereof and to provide a substantially similar X-ray signature as actual “live” explosive devices.
A first Threat Screening Kit 510, illustrated in
Another Threat Screening Kit 525, illustrated in
In accordance with another broad aspect disclosed herein, there is provided embodiments of various Mail Threat Kits. The Mail Threat Kits are designed to mimic the look and feel of “live” explosive devices or components thereof or of other types of mail threats and to provide a substantially similar X-ray signature as actual “live” explosive devices or other types of mail threats. Embodiments of the Mail Threat Kits may be used to train personnel to identify actual mail threats.
In addition to any of the Threat Screening Kits or mail threat kits described above, threat kits may include any one or more of the combinations of packages, explosive simulant quantities, firing circuit types, power source types, and/or detonator types listed in Table 2 below:
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this invention, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. For example, it is to be appreciated that any of the features of any of the embodiments disclosed herein may be combined or substituted for features of any other embodiment disclosed herein. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/931,456, titled “INERT IED TRAINING KITS,” filed on Jan. 24, 2014, and to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/857,531, titled “INERT IED TRAINING KITS,” filed on Jul. 23, 2013, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3457329 | Silver et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
5182764 | Peschmann et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5319547 | Krug et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5359936 | Simpson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5413812 | Simpson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5648636 | Simpson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5756006 | Reed, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5958299 | Kury et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
7694628 | Adebimpe | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7854811 | Wartman | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7932089 | Cohen-Arazi | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8114230 | Basom | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8172967 | Wartman | May 2012 | B1 |
8173430 | Cohen-Arazi | May 2012 | B2 |
8444881 | Adebimpe | May 2013 | B2 |
8563316 | Duffy et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8641843 | Hagit | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8857340 | Hagit et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20070281358 | Cohen-Arazi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090194744 | Adebimpe | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2011043702 | Jun 2011 | RU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150268016 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61931456 | Jan 2014 | US | |
61857531 | Jul 2013 | US |