Persistent crying and poor infant sleep are perennial and ubiquitous causes of parent frustration. During the first months of life, babies fuss/cry an average of about 2 hours/day and wake about 2 to 3 times a night. One in six infants are brought to a medical professional for evaluation for sleep/cry issues.
Infant crying and parental exhaustion are often demoralizing and lead to marital conflict, anger towards the baby and impaired job performance. In addition, they are primary triggers for a cascade of serious/fatal health sequelae, including postpartum depression (which affects about 15% of all mothers and about 25 to about 50% of their partners), breastfeeding failure, child abuse and neglect, suicide, SIDS/suffocation, maternal obesity, cigarette smoking, excessive doctor visits, overtreatment of infants with medication, automobile accidents, dysfunctional bonding, and perhaps infant obesity.
Traditional parenting practices have utilized swaddling, rhythmic motion and certain sounds to soothe fussing infants and promote sleep (by reducing sleep latency and increasing sleep efficiency). “Sleep latency” is defined as the length of time between going to bed and falling asleep. “Sleep efficiency” is defined as the ratio of time spent asleep (total sleep time) to the amount of time spent in bed. Swaddling, rhythmic motion and certain sounds imitate elements of a baby's in utero sensory milieu and activate a suite of brainstem reflexes, the calming reflex. Swaddling is a method of snug wrapping with the arms restrained at the baby's sides. This imitates the tight confinement babies experience in the womb. Swaddling also inhibits startling and flailing, which often interrupts sleep and starts/exacerbates crying.
Rhythmic motion replicates the movement fetuses experience when the mother is walking. The motion stimulates the vestibular apparatus in the semicircular canals of the inner ear. A specific, rumbling low-frequency noise imitates the sound created by the turbulence of the blood flowing through the uterine and umbilical arteries. In utero the sound level babies hear has been measured at between 72 and 92 dB. Each baby has a specific and distinctive unique mix of motion and sound that most efficiently activates his or her calming reflex. This preferred mix stays consistent through the first months of life (i.e. babies who respond best to swaddling plus motion continue to respond to those modalities over time and don't abruptly switch their preference to swaddling plus sound).
The calming reflex has several constant characteristics. It is triggered by a stereotypical sensory input; produces a stereotypical behavioral output; demonstrates a threshold phenomenon (i.e. stimuli that are too mild may not be sufficient to activate a response); has a threshold that varies between individuals (i.e. is higher or lower for any given child); the threshold varies by state (e.g. fussing and crying raise the level of stimulation required to exceed threshold and bring about reflex activation).
Since the nominal level of a stimulus needed to reach the triggering threshold of the calming reflex differs from one child to the next, failure to exceed a particular child's threshold level often results in a total absence of a calming response. For example, slow smooth motion may calm one upset infant, yet be too subdued to calm another. Likewise, moderately loud sound may reach the calming threshold for one child, but not another. Once triggered, the stereotypical output of the calming reflex is a reduction of motor output and state. The intensity of sound and motion needed to trigger any particular baby's calming reflex is much greater than the levels needed to keep the calming reflex activated. “State” describes an infant's level of attention to and interaction with the environment. Infants experience six states: quiet sleep, active sleep, drowsiness, quiet alert, fussing and crying.
However, despite the convenience and availability of swaddling, rhythmic motion and sound, these methods fail to calm and promote sleep in a large portion of the infant population because they are not being applied correctly. To reduce infant crying and promote sleep parents often bring the baby into their own bed. However, this is problematic because sharing a bed with a parent has been proven to raise an infant's risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and accidental suffocation (which has been increasing by 14% per year for approximately twenty years). The hazard of bed sharing is further elevated if the parent is extremely fatigued. Like inebriation, exhaustion reduces adult judgment and responsiveness. Over 50% of new parents report sleeping fewer than 6 hours/night, the level demonstrated in adults to simulate a level of attention impairment comparable to inebriation. For this reason, sleeping with an exhausted parent further increases the SIDS risk associated with bed sharing and further increases the suffocation risk (e.g. from accidental overlaying of the parents body over the infant's head).
Other behaviors that exhausted parents engage in to calm crying and promote sleep also directly raise the risk of SIDS and suffocation (e.g. falling asleep with the baby on a couch, placing the baby on the stomach to sleep). Medical authorities recommend parents avoid bed sharing and place sleeping babies in cribs. However, cribs are problematic. Babies sleeping supine in cribs have a higher risk of plagiocephaly (flattening of the skull), which may require expensive and inconvenient medical treatment, and may result in a permanent deformity. In addition, a crib's flat, quiet, nonmoving surface is devoid of the swaddling, rhythmic motion and sound that reduce crying, reduce sleep latency and increase sleep efficiency.
In an attempt to improve infant sleep in cribs, parents have employed several methods (prone sleeping, swaddling, rocking motion, sound), however each is problematic. For example, the prone position is associated with a 3-4 fold increased risk of SIDS. Swaddled babies can roll to the stomach position (prone), which is associated with an 8-19 fold increased risk of SIDS. Rocking motion delivery systems (e.g. swings, cradles and hammocks) all present problems. When sitting in a swing, a baby's head can roll forward and create an airway obstruction. Cradles and hammocks require parents to be the motion-powering energy source, and thus can be done for only a limited part of the sleep period. Sound delivery devices (e.g. fans, air filters, hair driers, sound machines and white noise CDs) may be cumbersome and expensive and the volume, quality or frequency profile of the sound they produce may be excessive or too different from in utero sound to be effective.
Over the past twenty years, attempts have been made to engineer technological methods to create infant calming/sleep devices to deliver sound and motion more conveniently. One such device, a motorized cradle, was designed to rock sleeping babies in an arc along the head-foot axis. This product allowed the cradle to come to rest at an angle, in a partial swing position, which resulted in multiple infant deaths. Another device, designed to simulate a car traveling at about 55 miles per hour, is comprised of 2 parts: a vibrating motor that fixes to the underside of the crib and a speaker that fixes to the sidewall. Still another device has a motorized crib that moves back and forth (about 10 cm in each direction along the head-foot axis; each swing lasting about 1.8 seconds). A sensor activates the device's motor for a limited period of time when it detects the infant's cry. Still other devices have introduced sound machines or mats that vibrate for short periods of time to be placed under the baby to encourage sleeping.
These and other current infant calming/sleep devices deliver fixed and unchangeable motion and sound. This is a problem because each baby has a different mix of sound and motion that most efficiently calms the child and promotes sleep. For example, some babies respond best to swaddling plus motion, others swaddling plus sound. Another problem with fixed motion and sound infant calming/sleep devices is that each baby has a unique level of motion and sound that induces calming and sleep most efficiently. For example, slow rocking may reduce sleep latency for one infant, yet be too subdued to do so in another infant. And, quiet sound may be sufficient to increase sleep efficiency for one baby, but not another. Also, the intensity of sound and motion that a baby needs to trigger the calming reflex is much greater than the levels needed to keep the calming reflex activated.
Still another problem with fixed motion and sound infant calming/sleep devices is that the intensity of the stimuli needed to activate the calming reflex and induce calm and sleep varies substantially as a child's state changes. For example, most fussy babies require more vigorous, jiggly motion (with rapid acceleration-deceleration) and more vigorous sound inputs (as loud as a vacuum cleaner—75 to 80 dB). On the other hand, calm, sleepy babies need less vigorous inputs. Further, current infant calming/sleep devices do not continue all night long; do not deliver optimal sound and motion for triggering the calming reflex; do not increase and decrease their sensory input in a step-wise fashion to vary the sensory input intensity to give the baby the most effective level of stimulation; lack the ability to reduce the sensory input over time to wean a baby off the stimuli as he or she ages.
Therefore, a need exists for an infant calming/sleep system that overcomes or minimizes the above-mentioned problems.
The invention generally is directed to a method for aiding calming and sleep of an infant.
In one embodiment, the invention is an infant calming/sleep-aid device that includes a main moving platform that moves in a reciprocating manner. An actuator drives the reciprocating movement of the main moving platform and a moving head platform linked to the main moving platform reciprocates in response to reciprocating movement of the main moving platform. In a preferred embodiment, at least one of a motion sensing device and a sound sensing device are, respectively, at or proximate to the moving head platform. A logic circuit links at least one of the motion sensing device and the sound sensing device to the main moving platform, whereby signals detected by at least one of the motion sensing device and the sound sensing device cause the logic circuit to modulate the movement of the main moving platform.
In another embodiment, the infant calming/sleep-aid device includes a rigid base and a main movement linkage or bearing extending from the base. The main moving platform is mounted on the main movement linkage or bearing, whereby the main moving platform is movable on the main movement linkage or bearing relative to the base. An actuation assembly that controls movement of the main moving platform about the main movement linkage or bearing relative to the rigid base includes an actuator mounted to the rigid base.
In another embodiment, the invention is a method for aiding the calming of a fussy infant or the sleep of an infant, comprising the step of moving the infant in a reciprocating manner about an axis that intersects the infant at a 90° angle to a major plane of the surface supporting the infant.
In another embodiment, the invention is an adaptive calming and sleep aid method, including the steps of moving an infant in a reciprocating manner about an axis that intersects the infant and is orthogonal to a major plane of the surface supporting the infant. At least one of a sound generated by a sound generating device and a reciprocating movement is modulated in an updating and adaptive matter by a logic circuit-controlled actuation in response to at least one of the sound of the infant and the motion of the platform.
The present invention has many advantages. For example, the system and method of the invention provides for modulation of reciprocating movement of an infant in an updating and adaptive manner. The rapidly accelerating and decelerating reciprocal motion of the device which induces the infant's head to accelerate and decelerate over a short distance in a safe and specifically controlled manner induces the infant's natural calming reflex. The device's specifically designed motion and sound, along with its adaptive control system reduce irritability during awake hours and improve infant sleep (specifically reducing irritability during periods of sleep, reducing sleep latency and increasing sleep efficiency) for babies up to about twelve months old.
In one embodiment of the invention, shown in
In another representative view of infant calming/sleep-aid device 10 of
Reciprocating motion of main moving platform 16 about main support shaft 40 is about an axis that is orthogonal to a major plane of main moving platform 16. Reciprocating motion of main moving platform 16 is driven by actuator assembly 58.
In some embodiments, the body and the head of the infant can be out of phase. For example, at relatively slow speeds, the motion of the head of the infant can be in the same direction as that of the motion of the upper body of the infant. At relatively high speeds, the reciprocal motion of the head of the infant can be in the opposite direction as that of the upper body of the infant. In another embodiment of the invention (not shown), reciprocal motion of the head of the infant can be in some other direction, such as orthogonally relative to the plane of the main support platform.
Actuator assembly 58 includes drive motor 60 mounted to rigid base 32 and gear assembly 62 linked to drive motor 60 and also mounted to rigid base 32. Actuation of causes rotation gear assembly 62 to drive eccentric drive plate 64 about an axis normal to a major plane of rigid base 32. Eccentric drive plate 64 is linked to swing arm plate 66 of actuator assembly 58 that extends from eccentric drive plate 64 to rod end 68 of screw 70 and is pivotally mounted to rod end 68 of screw 70. Screw 70 is mounted to amplitude modulation assembly 72. Amplitude modulation assembly 72 includes amplitude modulation motor 74, nut 76, mounted on nut frame 78, which swivels on rotation bearing 80 mounted to rigid base 32. The axis of rotation of nut frame 78 on rotation bearing 80 is, like that of eccentric drive plate 64, normal to a major plane of rigid base 32. Actuation of amplitude modulation assembly 72 causes movement of screw 70 along its major longitudinal axis to thereby cause rod end 68 to become more proximate or less proximate to amplitude modulation assembly 72. Arm 82 extends from an end of screw 70 opposite to rod end 68 to elastic actuator catch bracket 84, which is mounted on base 18 of main moving platform 16. Arm 82 extends through an opening defined by elastic actuator catch bracket 84 and is linked to main moving platform 16 by springs 86, 88 held in place on either side of elastic actuator catch bracket 84 by nuts 90, 92 respectively.
Actuation of actuation assembly drive motor 60 causes rotation of eccentric drive plate 64 about an axis normal to a major plane of rigid base 32 which, in turn, causes reciprocal motion of swing arm plate 66 roughly along a major longitudinal axis of swing arm plate 66. Such reciprocal motion of swing arm plate 66 causes rod end 68 to move in a reciprocal motion from side-to-side of a major longitudinal axis of screw 70 which causes reciprocal rotation of nut frame 78 about an axis normal to major plane rigid base 18 and side-to-side motion of the opposite end of screw 70 opposite that of rod end 68 of screw 70. Such side-to-side movements of the opposite end of screw 70 causes reciprocal longitudinal movement of arm 82 extending through the opening defined by elastic actuator catch bracket 84. Resistance to such reciprocal motion of arm 82 causes alternating reciprocal compression and relaxation of springs 86, 88, which thereby causes reciprocal motion of main moving platform 16 about main support shaft 40 linking main moving platform 16 to rigid base 32.
The amplitude of reciprocal motion of main moving platform 16 about main support shaft 40 is controlled by the location of screw 70 relative to amplitude modulation assembly 72. For example, if actuation of amplitude modulation assembly 72 causes rod end 68 to become more proximate to amplitude modulation assembly 72, the side-to-side motion of the opposite end of screw 70 will become greater, thereby causing the amplification of reciprocal motion of main moving platform 16 about main support shaft 40 to increase. Conversely, actuation of amplitude modulation assembly 72 to cause rod end 68 of screw 70 to become more remote from amplitude modulation assembly 72 will diminish the side-to-side motion of opposite end of screw 70, thereby reducing the amplitude of reciprocal motion of main moving platform 16 about main support shaft 40.
Reciprocal motion of main moving platform 16 causes a delayed reciprocal motion of moving head platform 44 about head rotation bearing 46. The reciprocal motion of moving head platform 44, although delayed, has greater amplitude about main support shaft 40 because of the rotation of moving head platform 44 about head rotation bearing 46. However, the amplitude of reciprocal motion of moving head platform 44 about head rotation bearing 46 is dampened by springs 56. Nevertheless, the reciprocal motion of main moving platform 16 and moving head platform 44 about main support shaft 40 is measured by motion sensing device 50 at moving head platform 44. Measurements by motion sensing device 50 are relayed back to control panel 34 and rigid base control electronics 36 which, alone, or optionally, in combination with external computer software programming, modulate actuator assembly drive motor 60 and amplitude modulation motor 74. Motion detection by motion sensing device 50 can also, optionally, modulate computer programming to affect selection and volume of sounds emitted by speakers 52. Microphones 38, in addition, or optionally, receive acoustical signals that can be fed back through rigid base control electronics 36 or/and control panel 34 to software, either on-board or remote from infant calming/sleep-aid device 10, that further modulates actuator assembly drive motor 60, amplitude modulation motor 74 and/or sounds emitted from speakers 52. Algorithms associated with modulation of actuator assembly drive motor 60, amplitude modulation motor 74 and speakers 52 will be more fully discussed below.
In one embodiment, the device allows for a reciprocating motion at 0.5-1.5 cps of 2″ excursions, but if the baby is fussy the device responds by delivering a smaller excursion (e.g. <1″) at a faster rate (2-4.5 cps). This fast and small motion delivers the specific degree of acceleration-deceleration force to the semicircular canals in the vestibular mechanism of the inner ear that is required to activate the calming reflex.
Also, the reciprocating motion typically has a maximum amplitude of less than one inch during the rapid phase of motion (2-4.5 cps), further ensuring safety of the infant.
In another embodiment, shown in
Actuation of drive motor 104 causes reciprocal longitudinal movement of push/pull rod 110 through the opening defined by elastic actuator catch bracket 112 and translates that reciprocal movement into reciprocal motion of main moving platform 16 about main rotation bearing 42, as does reciprocal motion of arm 82 through elastic actuator catch bracket 84 of the embodiment shown in
As shown
Data received from accelerometer 123 is processed by motion analysis module 132 to thereby modulate the actuator assembly through motion generation module 128 and/or audio generation module 130 to thereby control the actuators assemblies or speakers, respectively. In addition, motion analysis module 132 controls status light module 134 to alert, through the status lights, whether motions of the main moving platform and the head platform are nominal or not nominal, or alternatively, through feedback, soothing or not soothing to the infant. “Nominal”, as that term is defined herein, refers to any and all motion for which the filtered acceleration signal does not exceed a specified, or predetermined maximum motion threshold for a specific length of time. The process by which the motion analysis module classifies motion as nominal or not nominal is detailed in
In one embodiment the rate of the reciprocating rotation is in a range of between about two and about four and one-half cycles per second and an amplitude of the reciprocating motion at a center of a head of the infant is in a range of between about 0.2 inches and about 1.0 inches. In anther embodiment, the rate of reciprocating motion is in a range of between about 0.5 and about 1.5 cycles per second and an amplitude of the reciprocating rotation at a center of the head of the infant is in a range of between about 0.5 inches and about 2.0 inches.
The software weans the infant off the device by incorporating the infant age as a variable used by the behavior state module control system, wherein modulation is further controlled by at least one of the weight of the infant, the age of the infant, and the duration of the detected sounds made by the infant.
Referring to
Motion analysis module 132, shown and represented in more detail in
As can be seen in
Audio generation module 130, represented in
At baseline, the audio generator will produce an output of a low-pitch, rumbling sound at about 65 dB to about 70 dB. Upon receipt of a new command from crying detection module 124 (
Two variations of motion generation module are represented in
In an alternative embodiment of motion generation module 128, shown in
Two versions of the infant calming/sleep-aid device as shown in
The device worked in the following way:
The baby was placed in a swaddling sack (with arms in or out) attached to the mattress of the device and securely laid on his/her back. The device produced a baseline level of low pitched, rumbling noise at approximately 65 dB and baseline motion of a smooth, side-to-side rocking (2 inch excursions to either side). When the baby cried for more than −10 seconds, the device responded by playing a specially engineered sound that was harsher, higher pitched, more multi-frequency (75-80 dB) to mimic the intensity of the sound that the baby heard inside the mother's uterus prenatally. (This sound can be measured in situ at up to 92 dB.) If the crying continued another −10 seconds (despite the sound), the motion accelerated to a faster, more jiggly action of the head (2-4.5 cps, but no more than 1 inch head excursions to either side). The combination of fast movements delivered with sufficient vigor, the harsh loud sound, and the secure swaddling sack all worked together to activate the calming reflex, in the majority of irritable babies and inducing either calmness or sleep. The device responded to the baby's cry in a step-wise fashion-gradually increasing sound and then motion-to a maximal level. Once the baby was calmed the motion and sound of the device was gradually reduced in a specific, step-wise fashion back to the baseline activity.
Subjects
The device was tested on over twenty babies (12 girls, 10 boys) were in the device. The babies ranged from 5 weeks to 6 months of age. Their weights ranged from 8 pounds to 18 pounds.
Methods and Procedures
The subjects were tested to record their resting and sleeping in the device. The tests usually began when the baby was hungry and tired (immediately before their usual naptime). The parents were introduced to the device and given a brief demonstration of how it worked. We recorded when the baby last fed and napped and then put the baby in the swaddling sack and placed the infant in the device. We observed and videotaped the session. In addition, we collected data from 3 accelerometers and a device-mounted camera to detect the vigor of activity and measure the exact excursions of the baby's head. We started each test with the device set at its lowest level for sound and motion. We observed as the device responded to the baby's cries. We allowed the device to quickly advance through each of its stages as the cries escalated. Once the baby was calmed, the device's motion would slow, in a stepwise fashion, and the loudness and pitch of the sound would decrease, in a stepwise fashion. We repeated this format 2-4 times during our sessions with each of the subjects. The first set of studies was done using a prototype with a dual motion actuator and the second set of studies was done with a prototype with a single motion actuator.
Results
As shown in the attached table, during twenty-one tests, 19 babies were either significantly calmed or put to sleep by our device (absence of calming was due to hunger). Most calming and sleep occurred within 2 minutes of placing the baby in the device.
We hypothesized that a device could be built that responded to the baby's needs, such that an infant's upsets would be soothed by vigorous stimulation to activate the calming reflex, followed by a diminution of those stimuli to help keep the calming reflex turned on and sustain the baby in a calm state and/or promote sleep, i.e., reducing sleep latency and increasing sleep efficiency. “Sleep latency” is defined as the length of time between going to bed and falling asleep. “Sleep efficiency” is defined as the ratio of time spent asleep—total sleep time to the amount of time spent in bed.)
It was possible to promote infant calming and sleep through the use of swaddling plus very specific sound and motion stimuli to activate the calming reflex.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to example embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
The relevant teachings of all references cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/353,258, filed Apr. 21, 2014, which is a 371 of PCT/US2012/061069, filed Oct. 19, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/549,627, filed on Oct. 20, 2011. Each of the above applications is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1332400 | Johnson | Mar 1920 | A |
1897258 | Jenne | Feb 1933 | A |
D90696 | Caldwell | Sep 1933 | S |
D128488 | Buckner | Jul 1941 | S |
D158030 | Wagner | Apr 1950 | S |
2508110 | Hansen | May 1950 | A |
2523422 | Dunn | Sep 1950 | A |
2808828 | Rubin | Oct 1957 | A |
2873458 | Adamson | Feb 1959 | A |
2974325 | Mango | Mar 1961 | A |
2992440 | Revolt | Jul 1961 | A |
3146736 | Robert | Sep 1964 | A |
3536067 | Sternagel | Oct 1970 | A |
D224822 | Lee, Jr. | Sep 1972 | S |
3789439 | Berg | Feb 1974 | A |
D232279 | White | Aug 1974 | S |
3886607 | Dunn | Jun 1975 | A |
D244890 | Adams | Jul 1977 | S |
4553485 | Lee | Nov 1985 | A |
4611353 | Als et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4619270 | Margolis | Oct 1986 | A |
4750223 | D'Arcy | Jun 1988 | A |
4934997 | Skakas | Jun 1990 | A |
D316339 | Taylor | Apr 1991 | S |
5037375 | Gatts | Aug 1991 | A |
D320316 | Arnold | Oct 1991 | S |
5129406 | Magnusen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5183457 | Gatts et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5228155 | Shultz | Jul 1993 | A |
5295490 | Dodakian | Mar 1994 | A |
5311622 | Allen | May 1994 | A |
5381569 | Church | Jan 1995 | A |
5384922 | Jobe | Jan 1995 | A |
5385153 | Jamieson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398353 | Sachathamakul | Mar 1995 | A |
D367979 | Lewis | Mar 1996 | S |
5577450 | Huang | Nov 1996 | A |
5668780 | Hsieh | Sep 1997 | A |
5684460 | Scanlon | Nov 1997 | A |
5706533 | Opheim | Jan 1998 | A |
5711045 | Caster et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5806113 | McMahan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
D401454 | De Blaay | Nov 1998 | S |
5845350 | Beemiller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852827 | Lear et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855031 | Swift | Jan 1999 | A |
5881408 | Bashista et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5931534 | Hutter | Aug 1999 | A |
D413454 | Kasem | Sep 1999 | S |
D417090 | Reynolds | Nov 1999 | S |
D418440 | Dallaire | Jan 2000 | S |
6009576 | Grammet et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6011477 | Teodorescu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6068566 | Kim | May 2000 | A |
6146332 | Pinsonneault | Nov 2000 | A |
6148455 | Kassem | Nov 2000 | A |
6155976 | Sackner | Dec 2000 | A |
6343994 | Clarke | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6386986 | Sonner | May 2002 | B1 |
6393612 | Thach et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415442 | Smith et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6498652 | Varshneya et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6588033 | Welsh | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594834 | Fenty | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6652469 | Pinsonnault | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6662390 | Berger et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6839924 | Sims et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868566 | Gatten et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6907626 | Welsh | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6916249 | Meade | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928674 | Blackburn | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6966082 | Bloemer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
D512466 | White | Dec 2005 | S |
6978479 | Thach et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
D518942 | Dandrea | Apr 2006 | S |
7043783 | Gatten et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7076819 | Trani et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
D526133 | Song | Aug 2006 | S |
7100724 | Haigh et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123758 | Mostafavi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D536191 | Kasem | Feb 2007 | S |
D536550 | Kasem | Feb 2007 | S |
7181789 | Gatten et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7203981 | Cowgill et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7246392 | Schmid et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
D561978 | Sioleau | Feb 2008 | S |
7337482 | Byrne et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347806 | Nakano et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7406725 | Martin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427921 | Van | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7485086 | Dickie et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7587769 | McDermott et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7587772 | Ward et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
D605870 | Bergkvist | Dec 2009 | S |
D606282 | Chen | Dec 2009 | S |
7685657 | Hernandez et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
D613091 | Taylor | Apr 2010 | S |
7722118 | Bapst et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
D616665 | Dumais | Jun 2010 | S |
7743442 | Maloney et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7774875 | Zeidman et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7785257 | Mack et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7857677 | Kamm | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7918505 | King et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7954187 | Earnest et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
D644413 | Keall | Sep 2011 | S |
8011037 | Earnest et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8032958 | Pieta et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
D650153 | Chopak et al. | Dec 2011 | S |
8083601 | Speedie et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096960 | Loree et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8112835 | Eirich et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8141186 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8191188 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8197005 | Daley et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8239984 | Hopke et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8269625 | Hoy et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
D669659 | Barski | Oct 2012 | S |
8302225 | Earnest et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8321980 | Maloney et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
D674614 | Morand | Jan 2013 | S |
8347432 | Schmid et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8365325 | Schneider et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8375486 | Earnest et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
D678693 | Bergkvist | Mar 2013 | S |
8395510 | Kirk | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8398538 | Dothie et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8429771 | Long et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8522375 | Conrad et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8539620 | Wynh et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
D692209 | Dragu | Oct 2013 | S |
8555414 | Davis et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561227 | Jenkins et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
D696486 | Barski | Dec 2013 | S |
8607364 | Barski et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8607366 | Austin | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8661582 | Sclare et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8667631 | Coates et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8695133 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8726437 | Hardesty et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8745794 | McDermott | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8756731 | Huttner et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8769737 | Duggins et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8776265 | Neveu et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777311 | Laurel et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8782831 | Houston et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784227 | Speedie et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8827366 | Daley et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832880 | Sheard et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8845440 | Haut et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D715027 | Daugherty | Oct 2014 | S |
8863329 | Sofia-McIntire et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
D718017 | Barski | Nov 2014 | S |
8898833 | Coates et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8904580 | Christensen et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8910332 | Buckson | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8942783 | Cervantes et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8943625 | Gotel et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9003564 | Wynh | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9020622 | Shoham et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
D728198 | Barski | May 2015 | S |
D728199 | Barski | May 2015 | S |
9032963 | Grissom | May 2015 | B2 |
9060549 | Buckson | Jun 2015 | B2 |
D734592 | Castillo et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
9119423 | Gotel et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9131734 | Daugherty et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
D741046 | Pelekanou | Oct 2015 | S |
9155403 | Mountz et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
D742097 | Dunn | Nov 2015 | S |
9179711 | Krawchuk | Nov 2015 | B2 |
D751847 | Brown | Mar 2016 | S |
9392881 | Schmelzle | Jul 2016 | B1 |
D780472 | Behar | Mar 2017 | S |
9962012 | Schmid et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
20020016991 | Brown | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020100116 | Richards et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040070254 | Conlon et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078895 | Elling et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050022284 | Thach | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050091743 | Bloemer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120459 | McConnell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050210592 | Littlehorn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050283908 | Wong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025226 | Nakano et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042013 | Madsen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084514 | Speedie et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060096031 | Foster | May 2006 | A1 |
20060225206 | Kasem | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070056109 | Forshpan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060015 | Glatt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061968 | Fader | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085695 | Nerurkar et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070111809 | Bellows | May 2007 | A1 |
20070267904 | Clapper et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080077020 | Young et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080136236 | Kincaid | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141457 | Forshpan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080196164 | Calilung | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217150 | Chen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080314665 | Sanders et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090062622 | Lin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064390 | Beiring et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090131185 | Speedie | May 2009 | A1 |
20090206642 | Raphael | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100044164 | Thorne | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100201171 | Velderman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218299 | Damir | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228315 | Nielsen | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231421 | Rawls-Meehan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257654 | Waters et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100275373 | Kaplan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298742 | Perlman | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100328075 | Rahamim et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110025915 | Daban et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032103 | Bhat et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110078855 | Buckson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099719 | Hardesty et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116549 | Riddiford et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110179546 | Millette et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110277210 | Hardesty et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110308011 | Cheng | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120025992 | Tallent et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120083670 | Rotondo | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120125347 | Soileau et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120216349 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120297518 | Aiken et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311762 | Aiken et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130123654 | Rahamim et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130139290 | Barski et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165809 | Abir | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130185867 | Long et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140059762 | Bonczek | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140068834 | Skinner | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140130254 | Jeong | May 2014 | A1 |
20140173822 | Doering et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140249382 | Bhat et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140250558 | Russo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140250592 | Karp et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140265480 | Perrin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140339867 | Daley et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140345042 | Morand | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150026886 | Gangan | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150045608 | Karp et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150059089 | Falkiner | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150126819 | Cervantes | May 2015 | A1 |
20150196137 | Zhao | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150250330 | Mountz et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150250419 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160128392 | Krawchuk | May 2016 | A1 |
20160165961 | Karp | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160174619 | Waters | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160174728 | Karp et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160310067 | Heinrich et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170043117 | Karp et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170043118 | Karp et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2459037 | Aug 2005 | CA |
2760609 | Nov 2010 | CA |
2848529 | Mar 2013 | CA |
2918029 | Apr 2016 | CA |
1759897 | Apr 2006 | CN |
101036556 | Sep 2007 | CN |
2018085348 | Jul 2008 | CN |
201718870 | Jan 2011 | CN |
617907 | Jun 1997 | EP |
1435810 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1748711 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1748711 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2617329 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2197322 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2292124 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2768345 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2915459 | Sep 2015 | EP |
2929812 | Oct 2015 | EP |
2756136 | Aug 2016 | EP |
2669201 | May 1992 | FR |
2312374 | Oct 1997 | GB |
07275091 | Oct 1995 | JP |
07289394 | Nov 1995 | JP |
2000510022 | Aug 2000 | JP |
1020040097883 | Nov 2004 | KR |
1020040097883 | Nov 2004 | KR |
20060019024 | Mar 2006 | KR |
1020060079587 | Jul 2006 | KR |
20090121797 | Nov 2009 | KR |
199817150 | Apr 1998 | WO |
20090121797 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2007062499 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2010098702 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2013038248 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013059625 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013087955 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013135975 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013188810 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014078442 | May 2014 | WO |
2015017709 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015017709 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015078937 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015143430 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016055946 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016096518 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016123619 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2016138441 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Oval Crib, Fine Woodworking, http://www.finewoodworking.com/ readerproject/2009/11/11/oval-crib (sited visited Apr. 4, 2018), Nov. 11, 2009. |
SNOO Bassinet, Can this High-Tech Bassinet Keep Sleep-Deprived Parents Sane?, The Wall Street Journal, http://www.wsj.com/articles/can-this-high-tech-bassinet-keep-sleep-deprived-parents-sane, Oct. 18, 2018. |
Putting Baby in SNOO Sack, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvTIOzWxG80, Oct. 28, 2016. |
Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2016 in Australian Application No. 2012325947. |
Extended European search report dated Feb. 24, 2017 in European patent application No. 14831425.5. |
“Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles; Correction”, Federal Register, vol. 78, No. 247, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/12/24/2013-30527/safety-standard-for-bassinets-and-cradles-correction (accessed Nov. 10, 2016), Consumer Product Safety Commission, Dec. 24, 2013, 1 page. |
Edge Banding, Kreg Newsletter, Nov. 2014, site visited Jun. 15, 2017, availabe online <URL:http://www.kregtool.com/files/newsletters/kregplus/november14.html>. |
Iron-on Edge Banding, Popular Woodworking Magazine, Sep. 19, 2008,site visited Jun. 15, 2017, available online <URL:http://www.popularwoodworking.com/projects/iron-on-edge-banding>. |
“About SUID and SIDS”, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/sids/aboutsuidandsids.htm (accessed Nov. 3, 2016), Last update: Oct. 3, 2016, 2 pages. |
“Infant Sleep Forum Posting”, http://www.sleepnet.com/infant/messages/501.html, (accessed Mar. 16, 2015), 2 pages. |
“Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles; Correction”, Federal Register, vol. 78, No. 205, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/10/23/2013-24203/safety-standard-for-bassinets-and-cradles, (accessed Nov. 10, 2016), Consumer Product Safety Commission, Oct. 23, 2013, 18 pages. |
“Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers”, Federal Register, vol. 79, No. 10, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/01/15/2014-00597/safety-standard-for-bedside-sleepers, (accessed Nov. 10, 2016), Consumer Product Safety Commission, Jan. 15, 2014, 9 pages. |
“SIDS and Other Sleep-Related Infant Deaths: Expansion of Recommendations for a Safe Infant Sleeping Environment”, Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Pediatrics, vol. 128, No. 5, Nov. 2011, pp. e1341 (29 pages). |
12781007.5, “European Application Serial No. 12781007.5, Examination Notification Art 94(3) dated May 5, 2015”, Unacuna, LLC, 3 Pages. |
AAP Task Force on SIDS, “The Changing Concept of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Diagnostic Coding Shifts, Controversies Regarding the Sleeping Environment, and New Variables to Consider in Reducing Risk”, Peds, vol. 116, 2005, pp. 1245-1255. |
Ariagno, et al., “Fewer spontaneous arousals during prone sleep in preterm infants at 1 and 3 months corrected age”, Journal of Perinatology, vol. 26, 2006, pp. 306-312. |
Carpenter, et al., “Sudden unexplained infant death in 20 regions in Europe: case control study”, The Lancet, vol. 363, No. 9404, 2004, pp. 185-191. |
Colvin, et al., “Sleep Environment Risks for Younger and Older Infants”, Pediatrics, vol. 134, Jul. 2014, pp. e406-e412. |
Galland, et al., “Prone versus supine sleep position: a review of the physiological studies in SIDS research”, J Paediatr Child Health. vol. 38, No. 4, Aug. 2002, pp. 332-338. |
Groswasser, et al., “Reduced arousals following obstructive apneas in infants sleeping prone”, Pediatric Research, vol. 49, No. 3, 2001, pp. 402-406. |
Horne, et al., “Effects of body position on sleep and arousal characteristics in infants”, Early Human Development, vol. 69, iss. 1-2, Oct. 2002, pp. 25-33. |
Horne, et al., “The prone sleeping position impairs arousability in term infants”, The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 138, No. 6, 2001, pp. 811-816. |
Kato, et al., “Spontaneous Arousability in Prone and Supine Position in Healthy Infants”, Sleep, vol. 29, No. 6, 2006, pp. 785-790. |
L'Hoir, et al., “Risk and preventive factors for cot death in The Netherlands, a low-incidence country”, Eur J Pediatr, vol. 157, 1998, pp. 681-688. |
Li, et al., “Infant Sleeping Position and the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in California, 1997-2000”, Am J Epidemiol, vol. 157, No. 5, 2003, pp. 446-455. |
McDonnell, et al., “Infant Deaths and Injuries Associated with Wearable Blankets, Swaddle Wraps, and Swaddling”, J Pediatr., vol. 164, No. 5, May 2014, pp. 1152-1156. |
Mitchell, et al., “Changing Infants' Sleep Position Increases Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome”, Arch Ped Adol Med., vol. 153, 1999, pp. 1136-1141. |
Øyen, et al., “Combined effects of sleeping position and prenatal risk factors in sudden infant death syndrome: the Nordic Epidemiologi-cal SIDS Study”, Pediatrics, vol. 100, No. 4, 1997, pp. 613-621. |
PCT/US2012/061069, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/061069, International Preliminary Report on Patentability With Written Opinion dated May 1, 2014”, Unacuna, LLC, 4 Pages. |
PCT/US2012/061069, “International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/061069 dated Mar. 11, 2012”, 8 pages. |
PCT/US2014/049253, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/049253 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 11, 2016”, The Happiest Baby, Inc., 10 pages. |
PCT/US2014/049253, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/049253, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 24, 2014”, Unacuna, LLC, 13 pages. |
PCT/US2016/019878, “International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/019878, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 6, 2016”, Happiest Baby, Inc., 7 pages. |
Pease, et al., “Swaddling and the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: A Meta-analysis”, Pediatrics, vol. 137, No. 6, Jun. 2016, pp. e20153275 (11 pages). |
Ponsonby, et al., “Factors potentiating the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome associated with the Prone Position”, NEJM, vol. 329, 1993, pp. 377-382. |
Shapiro-Mendoza, et al., “Trends in Infant Bedding Use: National Infant Sleep Position Study, 1993-2010”, Pediatrics, vol. 135, 2015, pp. 10-17. |
Tuladhar, et al., “Effects of sleep position, sleep state and age on heart rate responses following provoked arousal in term infants”, Early human development, vol. 71, iss. 2, Apr. 2003, pp. 157-169. |
Vennemann, et al., “Sleep Environment Risk Factors for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: The German Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Study”, Pediatrics, vol. 123, No. 4, Apr. 2009, pp. 1162-1170. |
Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2017 from related Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2014/004648. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/055,105, filed Feb. 26, 2016, Pending. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/057055, dated Feb. 1, 2018. |
Naver blog, URL: https://blog.naver.com/redtony02/30103163614. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US19/191010, dated May 24, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160166081 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61549627 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14353258 | US | |
Child | 15051308 | US |