Correct infant positioning is an important adjunct to the care of a premature infant. Although supporting and positioning the infant is recognized as a high priority, health care professionals have mostly used found objects to do the job, such as blankets, pillows, towels. Many positioning aids have been developed, but they have been primarily aimed at restraining movement in two-dimensions, helping to keep the baby from twisting or rolling around on the bed, for example. A simpler approach is the use of pillows or other objects to elevate the head. To accommodate wires and tubes, these devices can be deformed or the user can place several devices around the baby with spaces between them. Unfortunately, when the infant requires respiratory support this big, soft mass of positioning devices gets in the way of the tubing. Another approach, involving the use of small, spaced devices, reduces stability and complicates readjustment. Finally these materials often lose their shape over time, thereby requiring constant monitoring and adjustment.
There are a number of problems with these methods. First, they tend to use solid blocks, rolls, etc. that do not naturally accommodate tubing and wires. This makes it more difficult to attach tubing and wires to the baby without potentially injuring him/her by pushing, pulling, lifting or twisting. Second, they are not adapted to hold the baby above the surface of the bed which would provide a space between the baby and the bed through which wires could be extended; nor does it permit placing the baby at a specific, beneficial position in three dimensions and holding him/her there securely.
In addition, although it is known that a premature infant may be sensitive to the exact position into which he/she is placed, currently available infant support devices do not permit quick and accurate readjustment of infant position. As a consequence, valuable neonatal intensive care unit staff time may be spent readjusting pillows. At the same time, the needs of the infant are ill met, as a position adjustment takes longer and is made less precisely than would be desirable if possible.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.
In a first separate aspect the present invention may take the form of an infant holding device, including an infant holding portion, including a ductile sheet covered with infant-compatible material and a stand portion, adapted to support the infant holding portion in a vertically diagonal position, which thereby has a top and a bottom.
In one embodiment, the infant holding portion and the stand portion are formed from a single ductile sheet. In another embodiment the infant holding portion and the stand portion are separable, the stand portion being capable of supporting the infant holding portion by means of stand engagement elements located at the head and foot ends of the infant holding portion.
In a second separate aspect the present invention may take the form of a method of supporting an infant that uses an infant holding device including a ductile sheet covered with infant-compatible material. The infant holding device is bent into a shape adapted to retain the infant and the infant is placed into the infant holding device. In some embodiments, the position of the infant holding device is adjusted with respect to pitch angle or roll angle in order to hold the infant in a desired position.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive.
Ductile sheet: In the context of this application the term “ductile sheet” should be taken to mean a sheet of material that can be bent into a new shape by human hands and that then retains the new shape until bent again with at least an equal amount of force.
Human hands: In the above definition “human hands” means a pair of human hands having the amount of strength present in 95% of people between the ages of 15 and 75 years.
Sheet: In the above definition the word “sheet” encompasses both a solid or porous sheet of material such as metal or polymer and a thin mat of tightly woven, composite or layered material.
Infant-compatible: In the context of this application, “infant-compatible” means a material that can contact an infant without causing damage to the infant's skin. Accordingly, such a material is non-abrasive, smooth and hypo-allergenic.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
Referring to
Referring to
The infant-side layer 32 of padding material has a thickness of about 6 mm (¼ in), although other thicknesses may be used. Layer 32 should also be somewhat resiliently compressible and porous and is therefore made of open-cell polymeric foam, such as a polyurethane foam, with an applied layer of flexible pressure sensitive adhesive. An acceptable density for such foam material is 0.5-4.0 lbs. per cubic foot, with 0.75 lbs.-3.0 lbs. per cubic foot being preferred. An indentation load deflection of about 25 is preferred, but any value up to 40 is acceptable, to provide sufficient firmness yet be comfortable. The open-cell construction of the infant-side layer 32 of padding material allows sufficient circulation of air, to cool and to dissipate any moisture from the skin of an infant using the support 10, to provide comfort and safe conditions for the infant. One acceptable material for the infant-side layer 32 is available from Foamex, of Compton, Calif., as its Foam Grade F 145 44 F.6 FA 44145-304.
In an alternative preferred embodiment, support 10 includes a fabric covering made of a soft and absorbent or moisture-wicking fabric with a significant amount of elasticity to accommodate differing bending transformations of support 10. For example, a brushed terrycloth or boucle fleece of 65 percent polyester and 35 percent rayon fiber of 100 denier yarn, available from Eclat Textile Co. Ltd. of City of Industry, Calif., as its product number 1206D performs well for absorbing moisture and exudate from an infant's skin. Preferably, such a cloth is a low loop, tightly knitted material, brushed to provide a soft and slightly matted surface which is absorbent and not abrasive, so that support 10 can be used comfortably in direct contact with the infant's skin. In one preferred embodiment, the fabric covering around support 10 is shaped to fit snugly around fingers 40, like a glove. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the fabric covering around support 10 is shaped to span the gaps between fingers 40, like a mitten.
The outside layer 34 of padding material has a thickness preferably in the range of 2 mm inch to 7 mm. The layer 34 of padding material should be of a somewhat resiliently compressible or elastomeric material, and may be of a polymeric foam such as a closed cell microcellular low density expanded polyethylene available from Voltek Division of Sakisui American Corporation, as Volara Type A foam. Such foam material used as layer 34 preferably has a density of at least about 1.0 lbs. per cubic foot and preferably at least 2.0 lbs. per cubic foot. In an alternative preferred embodiment, outside layer 34 is a infant-compatible polymeric sheet, as opposed to a foam. Skilled persons will be familiar with a wide range of infant compatible polymers. In a further alternative embodiment, center ductile sheet 30 is a polymeric sheet with layers 32 and 34 sealed together about the sheet. In yet another preferred embodiment, an outer seal of silicone or other adhesive is provided.
In one preferred embodiment, engagement elements 18 and 20 are made of the same material as is infant holding portion 16, but in an alternative preferred embodiment, elements 18 and 20 are made of a more highly resilient material coated with a higher friction substance, to better engage holders 22. In one preferred embodiment, holders 22 include ears (not shown) that contact elements 18 and 22 over a larger surface area, for greater friction resistance, in order to help element 14 stay in place once positioned.
Infant holding portion 16, further includes an infant platform 38, and a set of fingers 40 extending outwardly and upwardly from infant platform 38. Fingers 40 can be curled up around infant 25 to affirmatively secure the infant. Although in
In one preferred embodiment, the spaces between fingers 40 can vary in width, becoming narrower further down toward infant platform 38. This embodiment permits the support of tubes and lines of varying thickness.
An infant support tab 42 is formed by a cut in infant platform 38.
Considering assembly 10, many advantages should now be apparent. One difficulty in the care of prematurely born, fragile infants, is the need to extend wires and tubing to different places on the infant. It is desirable, however, to keep these tubes and wires separated from the infant, except for in the place where they attach to the infant or to some other element that is attached to the infant. But when the infant is supported by cushions or padding, this can be difficult to do. Also, in some situations it may be difficult to access a wire or tube, in order to make an adjustment when a portion of a wire or tube is covered by a cushion.
In assembly 10, a great deal of open space is provided to thread wires and tubes (collectively “lines”) and even to keep them separate, as there is space under the stand 12, as well as space between stand 12 and moveable portion 14, through which lines can be extended. It is even possible to extend lines through the open space defined by engagement elements 18 and 20. Moreover, the spaces between fingers 40 provide access to the infant 25. The position of infant 25 may be quickly changed, simply by rotating element 14 or by adjusting legs 24 and 26.
Referring to
Referring now to
The roll angle can be changed by moving element 218 to a different engagement position, while the pitch can be changed by rotating moveable portion 214 by 180° and reengaging it so that element 218 mates with the lower slot, if it had previously engaged with the upper slot.
Referring now to
Finally, referring to
Although in
In an alternative preferred embodiment, medial segment 420 and vertical segment 418 are made of a different material from infant holding portion 416. For example these portions could be provided with a 90 degree angle already in place between portion 418 and 420, which could be made of a semi-rigid polymer sheet. In another preferred embodiment device 410 is provided already formed into a triangle, but with fingers 422 still extending to the side. In yet another preferred embodiment, fingers, similar to fingers 422 are attached to platform 421. This alternative permits a different material, having different material properties, to be used for the fingers than for platform 421.
It is most important that portion 416 be shaped into a form adapted to support a particular infant, although in some situations it will be important that the tilt of portion 416 be adjustable.
The above described embodiments of an infant holding assembly 10, 110, 210, 310 and 410 answer all the issues noted in the Background section. Each design permits rapid repositioning of an infant in both pitch and roll. Assemblies 10 and 110 permit an infinitely fine gradation of roll angle adjustment, whereas assembly 210 permits many choices as to roll angle. Assembly 310 permits a fine granularity of pitch angle adjustment.
As for infant holder 16, and the similar portions of assemblies 110, 210, 310 and 410, it is shaped loosely like a human hand and can be deformed to cuddle and hold the baby in a wide variety of natural and developmentally correct poses. The design allows for elevating or lowering the baby's body; for inclining or declining it; even for rotating it axially. The fingers 40 or 422 can be wrapped around the baby, keeping it securely in one position. The fingers 40 or 422 have spaces between them, and can be further moved by the user, to accommodate tubes, wires and devices. Also, tubes and wires can be secured to the device creating a strain relief at that point. When it is necessary to adjust the baby's position, the tubing, wires and devices may remain attached to support 10 as the entire collection can be adjusted as a unit.
While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those possessed of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/861,074 filed on Aug. 23, 2010 and claims priority from U.S. provisional application No. 61/763,082, filed on Feb. 11, 2013, which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
224272 | Buell | Feb 1880 | A |
2429350 | Farrand | Oct 1947 | A |
3110519 | Chernivsky | Nov 1963 | A |
3423773 | Yamate | Jan 1969 | A |
3487479 | Grooms | Jan 1970 | A |
4193150 | Vineberg | Mar 1980 | A |
4550901 | Muchisky et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4790042 | Reich | Dec 1988 | A |
4926512 | Coyle | May 1990 | A |
4941465 | Borschneck | Jul 1990 | A |
5020854 | Powell | Jun 1991 | A |
5133098 | Weber | Jul 1992 | A |
5261133 | Wilkerson | Nov 1993 | A |
5269591 | Miga et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5305754 | Honeywell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5360258 | Alivizatos | Nov 1994 | A |
5371909 | McCarty | Dec 1994 | A |
5425381 | Peterson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437069 | Bates | Aug 1995 | A |
5553921 | Schenk | Sep 1996 | A |
5755492 | Iver | May 1998 | A |
5918335 | Han | Jul 1999 | A |
5927806 | Ohlson | Jul 1999 | A |
5996153 | Slater et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6199229 | Wong | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6250712 | Livington et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D456162 | Peters | Apr 2002 | S |
6481032 | Milano et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6682137 | Hsia | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6877802 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6898812 | Smart | May 2005 | B2 |
6981956 | Scheinberg et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7181789 | Gatten | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7329229 | Scheinberg et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7412737 | Hernadez | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7562406 | Leach | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7793371 | Leach | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7895690 | Kovalyak | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8028361 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8316482 | Martin, III | Nov 2012 | B1 |
20050115000 | Kassai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050210580 | Clapper | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060096031 | Foster | May 2006 | A1 |
20060156471 | Cazzini et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080042402 | Nores | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052821 | Morton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080178387 | Kachtick-Anders | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209639 | Lord | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090007336 | Kassai et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110119832 | Hung | May 2011 | A1 |
20120260427 | Lam | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130283536 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61763082 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12861074 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13925254 | US |