This invention relates generally to the fields of parasitology, malaria research, and malaria vaccine development. More particularly it relates to Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range and the in vitro culturing of the mosquito stages of infectious Plasmodium parasites of human host range, particularly to sporozoite stage, and the use of in vitro cultured Plasmodium sporozoites as an immunogenic component of vaccines and other reagents.
Annually, Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) malaria causes >200 million clinical cases, more than 600,000 deaths, and is responsible for loss of greater than $12B of Gross Domestic Product in Africa [1-3]. Malaria is also a serious concern for travelers and military personnel. During 2010-2011 the number of cases of malaria in travelers from the United Kingdom increased by 30% [4]. In 2011, the U.S. had more cases of malaria than in any year in the past 40 years [5, 6]. In all U.S. military campaigns in highly malarious areas during the past 150 years, U.S. forces have had more casualties from malaria than from hostile fire [7]. A highly effective vaccine will have a dramatic impact on the roughly 2.5 billion “at-risk” individuals in the Global Health market.
The world community is now spending approximately $2 billion annually to control malaria through use of insecticide-impregnated bednets, insecticides, and antimalarial drugs. This amounts to approximately $80 per year for every child born in Africa, and in some locations 5 to 10 times that amount is being spent. These approaches are having an excellent effect in many areas. However, drug and insecticide resistance is still developing, and the ability of financial donors and local governments to sustain this effort is limited. It is clear that elimination of malaria from high transmission areas will require new tools. As described in a 2010 editorial, a highly effective vaccine would be the ideal tool for prevention, control and elimination of malaria worldwide:
And as described in a 2011 malERA initiative report, the ideal vaccine would be a pre-erythrocytic-stage vaccine that prevents parasites from getting out of the liver into the bloodstream, thereby preventing disease as well as transmission [8]. This has been termed a “vaccine that interrupts malaria transmission” (‘VIMT’).
Glaxo Smith Kline has developed a vaccine candidate termed RTS,S/AS01, which uses a recombinant protein (that fuses part of the Pf circumsporozoite protein (CSP) with hepatitis B surface antigen) with a strong adjuvant (AS01). Recent Phase 3 trials [9-12] in 5-27 month old humans demonstrated a 36% reduction in the incidence of malaria during a year and a 56% reduction in the rate at which malaria was acquired during the first year, and a 47% reduction in severe malaria during the first year. Unfortunately, the results in infants were not as strong. In 6-12 week old humans, the vaccine demonstrated a 16% reduction in the incidence of malaria during a year, a 31% reduction in the rate at which malaria was acquired during the first year, and a 36% reduction in severe malaria (26% by intention to treat) during the first year. These results have been called disappointing and would not qualify this vaccine as highly effective or as a VIMT.
During the last ten years, the focus for the development of a highly effective VIMT malaria vaccine has shifted in part to the utilization of the whole parasite, sporozoite (SPZ) stage, of Plasmodium as the vaccine immunogen. In a recently completed study at the Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), the Sanaria® PfSPZ Vaccine, composed of radiation attenuated Pf SPZ, was administered by intravenous (IV) injection and protected 6 of 6 (100%) of the volunteers who received the highest dose. There was a dose response in regard to protective efficacy (6/9 protected at next lower total dose) and a significant correlation between titers of antibodies against Pf SPZ and protection. Sanaria® PfSPZ Vaccine is therefore demonstrably potent and highly protective in humans. These historic results were published online in Science in August 2013 and in print in September 2013 [13].
SPZ are also being used as the parasite component of an infection and treatment approach to vaccination called Sanaria® PfSPZ-CVac, in which live infectious Plasmodium SPZ are administered in the presence of an asexual erythrocytic stage anti-malarial such as chloroquine [14].
Finally, live infectious Pf SPZ are being used for controlled human malaria infections (CHMI) as a means for testing malaria vaccines and other therapeutics [15, 16].
Substantially purified Plasmodium sporozoites prepared from salivary glands extracted from mosquitoes and grown in culture are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,625, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Presently, the whole parasite Pf SPZ used in the vaccines and reagents described above have been obtained by rearing aseptic Anopheles mosquitoes, infecting them with aseptic Pf gametocytes, permitting the Pf parasites to progress through sporogony in vivo within the mosquito, to the sporozoite stage, and then hand dissecting the salivary glands from the mosquitoes and isolating and purifying the aseptic sporozoites (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,229,627; 8,367,810) [17]. While this manufacturing approach is capable of producing sufficient quantities of live, aseptic purified Pf SPZ for use in all the clinical trials for these products, the methodology is labor intensive and requires substantial resources for insect husbandry and parasite dissection. In particular, dissecting from the mosquito salivary glands is a technical and time-consuming step in the production of Pf SPZ and other Plasmodium-species SPZ of human host range.
The mosquito host stages of Plasmodium parasite development are shown in
Provided herein are in vitro-reared infectious Plasmodium sporozoites (SPZ) of human host range, particularly Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) SPZ, wherein sporogony from gametocyte stage to sporozoite stage is external to mosquitoes. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared infectious Plasmodium sporozoites are absent any attendant mosquito material.
Additionally provided are cultures of in vitro-reared Plasmodium parasites of human host range, particularly Pf parasites, wherein said parasites have undergone sporogonic development in vitro. In some embodiments, cultures are absent any attendant mosquito material.
Additionally provided are methods of culturing Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range in vitro during sporogonic development of said sporozoites, said method comprising culturing human host range Plasmodium gametocytes in the presence of red blood cells in an exflagellation culture medium, agglutinating the red blood cells using a lectin, collecting a mixture (e.g. a pellet) comprising zygotes, gametes, gametocytes and agglutinated cells, culturing the collected mixture (e.g., the pellet) on a substrate comprising a matrix and in an ookinete culture medium, exchanging medium and continuing the culture in an oocyst medium and harvesting the Plasmodium sporozoites produced thereby.
Also provided are methods for increasing production of human host range Plasmodium oocysts relative to oocyst production from an equivalent number of human host range Plasmodium gametocytes in a mosquito, comprising culturing human host range Plasmodium gametocytes in an exflagellation culture medium, collecting a mixture (e.g. a pellet) comprising zygotes, gametes, gametocytes and agglutinated cells, culturing the collected mixture (e.g., the pellet) on a substrate comprising a matrix and in an ookinete culture medium, changing medium and continuing the culture in an oocyst medium and quantifying the number of Plasmodium oocysts, wherein said method produces more oocysts developed in vitro compared to oocysts of the same species developed in mosquitoes from an equivalent number of Plasmodium gametocytes.
Also provided are methods of inducing an immune response in a subject against Plasmodium-species specific antigens, comprising administering Plasmodium-reared sporozoites of human host range to the subject.
Also provided are vaccine compositions comprising in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range. In some embodiments, the vaccine is absent any attendant mosquito material.
The inventions disclosed herein provide, e.g., the following innovations: i) achieving an average 39-fold more oocysts developed in vitro compared to oocysts of the same Plasmodium species developed in mosquitoes and from an equivalent number of stage V gametocytes; ii) producing in vitro-reared, infective Pf SPZ; and iii) reaching infectivity of human liver cells by in vitro-produced Pf SPZ that is at least as efficient as mosquito-produced Pf SPZ.
This work stands out as being unique in the quantity of Pf SPZ produced from a given number of gametocytes in vitro, and in the demonstration of fully functional infectious activity of the in vitro-produced Pf SPZ. For example, it is described herein that in vitro-produced Pf SPZ successfully invaded the human hepatocyte cell line HC-04 [24,25], and developed to schizonts expressing merozoite surface protein 1 (Pf MSP1), a protein demonstrating infectivity; and it was demonstrated that this in vitro infectivity was at least as efficient as that of mosquito-produced Pf SPZ.
As used herein with regard to parasite development “in vitro” means independent of and external to an intact host organism (also referred to as a whole host organism). For example, in vitro development of a Plasmodium parasite of human host range includes culturing parasites that advance through developmental stages external to and independent of a live animal host, e.g., mosquitoes.
As used herein, “rearing” or “reared” means promoting and supporting the orderly and ontogenic progression of Plasmodium growth and development.
As used herein, “sporogony” (or sporogonic development) means the orderly and ontogenic progression of Plasmodium development through characteristic sexual stages from gametocyte to sporozoite.
As used herein “Plasmodium species of human host range” (used interchangeably with human host range Plasmodium species, Plasmodium parasites of human host range, and human host range Plasmodium parasites) include Plasmodium of the following species: P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae, and P. knowlesi.
As used herein, “culture”, in the context of in vitro-reared Plasmodium parasites of human host range, means a system external to a live animal host (e.g. mosquitoes) comprising a medium and Plasmodium parasites of human host range. In certain embodiments, the culture further comprises a substrate.
“Substrate” as used herein means a growth surface. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a cell culture matrix, e.g., comprising a polystyrene matrix and/or Matrigel [27, 28].
“Medium” as used herein means a nutrient composition. In certain embodiments, the medium is an exflagellation medium, which facilitates the emergence of gametes from gametocytes, which then undergo fertilization to zygotes, e.g., by mimicking mosquito lumen conditions after a blood meal. In certain embodiments, the medium is an ookinete medium, which facilitates the differentiation of zygotes to ookinetes. In certain embodiments, the medium is an oocyst medium, which provides nutrients for the in vitro sporogony to sporozoite stage.
“Suitable for human pharmaceutical use” as used herein refers to having a sufficient quantity, sterility (asepticity), and purity for approved clinical use in humans, for example, acceptable according to FDA or USP standards.
“Aseptic” as used herein means absent the introduction or presence of detectable microorganism contamination such as bacteria, fungi, pathologic viruses and the like. An aseptic method of sporozoite preparation results in a sterile preparation of sporozoites—free of any other type of microorganism or infectious agent. Aseptic preparation of a sterile composition is required for clinical and pharmaceutical use. Microbiological assays used to monitor an aseptic methodology assess the presence or absence of contamination. They include, but are not limited to, the Microbial Limits Test, current USP <61>, and sterility test, current USP <71>, incorporated herein by reference.
“Attendant material” as used herein refers to material in a culture or preparation of sporozoites, which is not the medium or a component of the medium, or a carrier or excipient, and is not specific to the sporozoites per se. In certain embodiments attendant material includes, e.g., biological debris. In some embodiments attendant material is a consequence of the means by which sporozoites are produced.
“Attendant mosquito material” as used herein is biological material or debris derived from and specific to a mosquito.
“Conferring protective immunity” as used herein refers to providing to a population or a host (i.e., an individual) the ability to generate an immune response protective against a disease (e.g., malaria) caused by a pathogen (e.g., Plasmodium falciparum) such that upon challenge, the clinical manifestations, pathology, or symptoms of disease in a host are reduced as compared to a non-treated host, or such that the rate at which infection, or clinical manifestations, pathology, or symptoms of disease appear within a population are reduced, as compared to a non-treated population.
“Immune response” as used herein in the context of a Plasmodium-specific antigen means a response in the recipient to the introduction of sporozoites, generally characterized by, but not limited to, production of antibodies and/or cellular immune responses. Generally, an immune response may be a cellular response such as induction or activation of CD4+ T cells or CD8+ T cells specific for Plasmodium-species epitopes, a humoral response of increased production of Plasmodium-specific antibodies, or both cellular and humoral responses. With regard to a malaria vaccine, the immune response established by a vaccine comprising sporozoites includes but is not limited to responses to proteins expressed by extracellular sporozoites or other stages of the parasite after the parasites have entered host cells, especially hepatocytes and mononuclear cells such as dendritic cells and/or to components of said parasites. In an embodiment of the instant invention, the immune response is a measurable antibody and/or cellular response to sporozoite-specific antigens. In other embodiments, upon subsequent challenge by infectious organisms the immune response prevents development of pathogenic parasites to the erythrocytic stage that causes disease.
“Vaccine” as used herein is a preparation comprising an immunogenic agent and a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent potentially in combination with excipient, adjuvant and/or additive or protectant. The immunogen may be comprised of a whole infectious agent or a molecular subset of the infectious agent (produced by the infectious agent, synthetically or recombinantly). When the vaccine is administered to a subject, the immunogen stimulates an immune response that will, upon subsequent challenge with infectious agent, protect the subject from illness or mitigate the pathology, symptoms or clinical manifestations caused by that agent. A therapeutic (treatment) vaccine is given after infection and is intended to reduce or arrest disease progression. A preventive (prophylactic) vaccine is intended to prevent initial infection or reduce the rate or burden of the infection. Agents used in vaccines against a parasitic disease such as malaria can be whole-killed (inactive) parasites, live parasites, live-attenuated parasites (unable to fully progress through their life cycle), or purified or artificially manufactured molecules associated with the parasite—e.g. recombinant proteins, synthetic peptides, DNA plasmids, and recombinant viruses or bacteria expressing Plasmodium proteins. A vaccine may comprise sporozoites along with other components such as excipient, diluent, carrier, preservative, adjuvant or other immune enhancer, or combinations thereof, as would be readily understood by those in the art.
“Attenuation” as used herein means a gene alteration or mutation of an organism such as a Plasmodium parasite, such that it loses its ability to complete its normal life cycle, but rather it arrests at a particular stage of development. In the Plasmodium organisms of the instant invention, the functions of one or more genes of a radiation attenuated or genetically attenuated parasite (GAP) are disrupted such that the attenuated mutant retains the ability to infect a host and invade hepatocytes within the liver, but arrests development in liver-stage.
“Hepatocyte Invasion” as used herein refers to the ability of the sporozoite-stage of the Plasmodium parasite to seek out and enter particular target cells, in this case, host hepatocytes, either hepatocyte cells in culture [24,25] or, hepatic cells in vivo after initial introduction into the circulatory system of a host. Non-attenuated parasites would then undergo further stage-specific development.
“Metabolically active” as used herein means alive and capable of performing sustentative functions and some life-cycle processes. With regard to attenuated sporozoites this includes but is not limited to sporozoites capable of invading hepatocytes in culture and in vivo, potentially having a limited capacity to divide and progress through some developmental stages within the liver, and de novo expression of stage-specific proteins.
In Vitro Sporozoites
Disclosed are compositions of in vitro-reared live, infectious sporozoites, particularly Plasmodium sporozoites—attenuated sporozoites as well as pathogenic sporozoites. In certain embodiments, the application is directed to cultures of in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range wherein sporogony from gametocyte stage to sporozoite stage is external to mosquitoes. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared infectious Plasmodium sporozoites are absent any attendant mosquito material. In certain embodiments, sporogony from gametocyte stage to sporozoite stage has occurred external to mosquitoes.
In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are at least 70%, 80%, or 90% as infectious to human hepatocytes as Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range reared in a mosquito. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are between 70-100%, 80-100%, or 90-100% as infectious to human hepatocytes as Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range reared in a mosquito. In some embodiments, the infectivity is measured in vitro or in vivo.
In some embodiments, the infectivity is measured using an in vitro Pf 6-Day Hepatocyte Potency Assay used to determine the ability of in vitro Pf SPZ to infect HC-04 (1F9) cells (a human hepatic cell line) [24,25] and develop into late liver stage parasites expressing PfMSP-1 [15]. An example of such a method can include:
In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are aseptic. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites have reduced risk of contamination with attendant material from a host organism, e.g., a mosquito (as might be the case with sporozoites dissected from the salivary glands of host mosquitoes).
In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are of human host range. In some embodiments, the species of in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites is P. falciparum.
In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are suitable for pharmaceutical use. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are used in a vaccine. In some embodiments the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are attenuated.
In vitro-reared Pf SPZ are tested for their ability to invade and develop in human hepatocytes in culture. In vitro-reared PfSPZ can also be tested in vivo for the ability to complete the Pf life cycle. This can be done by using human liver chimeric mice transfused with human blood.
Cultures
In certain embodiments, the application is directed to a culture of in vitro-reared Plasmodium parasites of human host range wherein said parasites are undergoing or have undergone sporogonic development in vitro.
In certain embodiments, the culture comprises Plasmodium parasites of human host range at an equivalent stage of sporogonic development. In certain embodiments, the culture is able to maintain continued sporogonic development of Plasmodium parasites of human host range.
In some embodiments, the parasites have reached sporozoite stage of development. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range are at least 70%, 80%, or 90% as infectious of hepatocytes as Plasmodium sporozoites of the same species reared in a mosquito. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range are between 70-100%, 80-100%, or 90-100% as infectious of human hepatocytes as Plasmodium sporozoites of the same species reared in a mosquito. In some embodiments, infectivity is measured in cultures of HC-04 cells, in some embodiment infectivity is measured by hepatic infection in vivo.
Some embodiments are directed to a culture of in vitro-reared infectious Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range wherein said culture is absent any attendant mosquito material and wherein said in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are at least 70%, 80%, or 90% as infectious of human hepatocytes as Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range, and of the same species, reared in a mosquito. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites are between 70-100%, 80-100%, or 90-100% as infectious of human hepatocytes as Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range, and of the same species, reared in a mosquito.
In some embodiments, the culture comprises a first (referred to as exflagellation) medium, which facilitates the emergence of gametes from gametocytes, e.g., by mimicking mosquito lumen conditions after a blood meal. In some embodiments, the exflagellation medium comprises fetal bovine serum (FBS), glucose, sodium bicarbonate and xanthurenic acid. In some embodiments, the exflagellation medium comprises 10-30%, 15-25%, or 18-22% FBS. In some embodiments, the exflagellation medium comprises 0.05% to 0.5%, 0.075% to 0.5%, or 0.075% to 0.25% glucose. In some embodiments, the exflagellation medium comprises 0.05% to 0.5%, 0.075% to 0.5%, or 0.075% to 0.25% sodium bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the exflagellation medium comprises 0.01% to 0.05%, 0.01% to 0.04%, or 0.02% to 0.04% xanthurenic acid. In some embodiments, the exflagellation medium comprises FBS, 0.05% to 0.5% glucose (e.g., 0.1%), 0.05% to 0.5% sodium bicarbonate (e.g., 0.1%) and 0.01% to 0.05% xanthurenic acid (e.g., 0.022%).
In some embodiments, the first medium is removed and the culture comprises a second (referred to as ookinete) medium, which facilitates the differentiation of zygotes to ookinetes and the invasion of ookinetes into a 3D matrix substrate. In some embodiments, the ookinete medium comprises FBS, RPMI, and trehalose. In some embodiments, the ookinete medium comprises 10-30%, 15-25%, or 18-22% FBS. In some embodiments, the ookinete medium comprises 0.1% to 0.5%, 0.15% to 0.3%, or 0.2% to 0.3% trehalose. In some embodiments, the ookinete medium comprises 0.1% to 0.5%, 0.15% to 0.3%, or 0.2% to 0.3% dextrose. In some embodiments, the ookinete medium comprises 0.01% to 0.08%, 0.02% to 0.06%, 0.03% to 0.05% sodium bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the ookinete medium further comprises an antibiotic. In some embodiments, the antibiotic is penicillin, streptomycin, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the ookinete medium comprises an antibiotic at 1 to 50 units/mL, 1 to 40 units/mL, 5 to 30 units/mL, or 10 to 20 units/mL. In some embodiments, the ookinete medium comprises an antibiotic at 1 to 50 μg/mL, 1 to 40 μg/mL, 5 to 30 μg/mL, or 10 to 20 μg/mL. In some embodiments, ookinete medium comprises of RPMI medium containing 10-30% FBS (e.g., 20%), 0.1% to 0.5% trehalose (e.g., 0.25%), 0.1% to 0.5% dextrose (e.g., 0.25%), 0.01% to 0.08% sodium bicarbonate (e.g., 0.04%), 1 to 50 units/mL penicillin (e.g., 10 units/mL) and 1 to 50 μg/mL streptomycin (e.g., 10 μg/mL).
In some embodiments, the second medium is removed and the culture comprises a third (referred to as oocyst) medium, which provides nutrients for the in vitro sporogony of the Plasmodium parasites to sporozoite stage. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises Schneider's Drosophila medium [26], FBS, sodium bicarbonate, trehalose, hypoxanthine, HEPES, essential amino acids, para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), antibiotic (e.g., penicillin and streptomycin), lipoproteins, cholesterol, and vitamins. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises 10-30%, 15-25%, or 18-22% FBS. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises 0.01% to 0.08%, 0.02% to 0.06%, 0.03% to 0.05% sodium bicarbonate. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises 0.1% to 0.5%, 0.15% to 0.3%, or 0.2% to 0.3% trehalose. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises 10 to 100 μg/mL, 20 to 100 μg/mL, 25 to 75 μg/mL, or 40 to 60 μg/mL hypoxanthine. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises 0.05M to 0.25M, 0.075M to 0.2M, or 0.075M to 1.5M HEPES. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises 0.01% to 0.08%, 0.02% to 0.06%, 0.03% to 0.05% PABA. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium further comprises an antibiotic. In some embodiments, the antibiotic is penicillin, streptomycin, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises an antibiotic at 1 to 50 units/mL, 1 to 40 units/mL, 5 to 30 units/mL, or 10 to 20 units/mL. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises an antibiotic at 1 to 50 μg/mL, 1 to 40 μg/mL, 5 to 30 μg/mL, or 10 to 20 μg/mL. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises 0.05% to 0.5%, 0.075% to 0.5%, or 0.075% to 0.25% lipoproteins. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises 0.05% to 0.5%, 0.075% to 0.5%, or 0.075% to 0.25% cholesterol. In some embodiments, the oocyst medium comprises Schneider's Drosophila medium, 10-30% FBS (e.g., 20%), 0.01% to 0.08% sodium bicarbonate (e.g., 0.04%), 0.1% to 0.5% trehalose (e.g., 0.25%), 10 to 100 μg/mL hypoxanthine (e.g., 50 μg/mL), 0.05M to 0.25M HEPES (e.g., 0.1M), essential amino acids (e.g., 1×, GIBCO), 0.01% to 0.08% para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA, e.g., 0.04 μg/mL), 1 to 50 units/mL penicillin (e.g., 10 units/mL) and 1 to 50 μg/mL streptomycin (e.g., 10 μg/mL), 0.05% to 0.5% lipoproteins (e.g., 1.5%), 0.05% to 0.5% cholesterol (e.g., 0.1%), and vitamins (e.g., 1×, GIBCO).
In some embodiments, the culture substrate comprises a 3D culture matrix. In some embodiments, the 3D culture matrix is pre-seeded with Drosophila Schneider S2 cells [26]. In some embodiments, the culture matrix comprises polystyrene matrix (e.g., AMS Biotechnology Ltd, UK) coated with Matrigel [27, 28]. For example, polystyrene matrix can be coated with Matrigel by carefully layering 1 mg/mL of Matrigel on top of the polystyrene matrix followed by incubation at 37° C. In some embodiments, the culture matrix comprises polystyrene matrix, Matrigel, and Drosophila Schneider S2 cells. In some embodiments, the matrix is coated with an extracellular matrix protein, e.g., a laminin, a collagen, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the culture is aseptic. In some embodiments, the sporozoites derived from the culture are suitable for pharmaceutical use.
Methods of Culturing Plasmodium Parasites
Disclosed are methods of culturing Plasmodium parasites and/or making cultures of in vitro-reared live, infectious Plasmodium sporozoites and methods of culturing and/or making compositions of in vitro-reared attenuated Plasmodium sporozoites.
In certain embodiments, the application is directed to methods of culturing Plasmodium parasites of human host range in vitro during sporogonic development of said parasites, comprising:
For example, methods for culturing can include: (a) suspending Stage V gametocytes in exflagellation medium (1 h) (In this step male and female gametes emerge from micro and macro gametocytes and interact (fertilization) to form zygotes); (b) agglutinating erythrocytes by adding lectin, e. g. wheat germ agglutinin, a lectin purified from wheat (1 h); (c) centrifuging the culture suspension to collect the pellet, which contains zygotes, erythrocyte debris and any gametocytes and gametes that had not undergone differentiation; (d) suspending the pellets in ookinete medium and seeding onto a 3D cell culture matrix pre-seeded with Drosophila Schneider S2 cells [26]. The 3D culture matrix was developed using Matrigel [27, 28] in 8-well culture plates or in other tissue culture vials or trans well culture inserts. Developed ookinetes then invade into the matrix in the next 20-24 h because they are motile (unlike gametocytes, gametes and zygotes which are not motile); (e) 20-24 h later, trans well inserts or 8-well culture plates are washed to remove any ookinetes that have not invaded into the matrix, as well as remaining gametocytes, gametes and zygotes (which did not develop to ookinetes) and the culture medium is replaced with oocyst medium. Ookinete that are in the matrix transform into oocyst in 12-24 h after invasion. (f) Oocyst medium is changed once in every 2-3 days; (g) 7, 8 and 11 day oocysts are determined on day 7, 8 and 11 day post-initiation of culture; (h) SPZs are harvested from the medium on day 15, 18, and 21 post culture initiations by collecting medium from the 8-well or trans well culture plates, followed by trituration. PfSPZ are counted using a cellometer; Harvested SPZs may then be seeded on HC-04 cells for determining potency using the 6-day hepatocyte potency assay.
In certain embodiments, the human host range Plasmodium gametocytes are derived from a culture of human host range Plasmodium in red blood cells (erythrocytes), e.g., as disclosed in Trager W, and Jensen J B. Science 193: 673-675, 1976, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Methods of Increased Production of Plasmodium Oocysts
In certain embodiments, the application is directed to an in vitro method for increasing the production of Plasmodium oocysts compared to oocysts of the same species and developed in mosquitoes from an equivalent number of human host range Plasmodium gametocytes comprising:
In certain embodiments, the human host range Plasmodium gametocytes are derived from a culture of human host range Plasmodium in red blood cells (erythrocytes), e.g., as disclosed in Trager (1976).
In some embodiments, the efficiency of transformation of stage V gametocytes to ookinetes in vitro is within the range of 1-25%, 5-25%, 5-21%, or 8-21%.
In some embodiments, the efficiency of transformation of stage V gametocyte to 7, 8, or 11 day oocysts is within the range of 1-15%, 2-14%, 2-25% or 2.4-12.5%.
In some embodiments, at least 10 to 20, 10 to 30, 10 to 39, or 10 to 60-fold more oocysts develop in vitro compared to oocysts developed in mosquitoes from an equivalent number of stage V gametocytes. In some embodiments, 10 to 20, 10 to 30, 10 to 39, or 10 to 60-fold more oocysts develop in vitro compared to oocysts developed in mosquitoes from an equivalent number of stage V gametocytes.
Disclosed are methods of using in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites, and attenuated in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites (See for example: U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,627; U.S. Ser. No. 61/783,326, both of which are incorporated herein by reference), as the immunogen in vaccines to prevent malaria. Also disclosed are methods of using in vitro-reared pathogenic parasites useful for assessing the effectiveness of antimalarial drugs and vaccines, and in conjunction with antimalarial agents, particularly antimalarials such as chloroquine, which target the asexual erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium infection, useful in vaccine regimens for conferring protective immunity.
In certain embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range of the application are used in a vaccine composition. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range are attenuated. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range are non-attenuated. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range are non-attenuated and used with an anti-malarial agent, e.g., chloroquine. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range induce an immune response in a human subject. In some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range generate an immune response to the corresponding Plasmodium sporozoites, and in some embodiments, the in vitro-reared Plasmodium sporozoites of human host range provide protective immunity to a human subject.
Optimizing Methods for Reproducibly Producing and Purifying Large Numbers of P. Falciparum Ookinetes In Vitro.
Ookinete production from gametocyte cultures of different ages, and at high and low gametocyte densities was assessed. Ookinetes and late retorts were reproducibly produced (
Several approaches were taken to purify and enrich cultured ookinetes away from uninfected erythrocytes. Approximately 90% of uninfected erythrocytes could be removed using Lympholyte-H gradient centrifugation, but the ookinetes co-purified with gametocytes, gametes and zygotes. A 3-step procedure was developed to purify and enrich. This procedure was successful and achieved >70% enrichment. The mean efficiency of transformation of stage V gametocytes to ookinetes in vitro was 13% (range=8-21%, Table 1).
Production of P. falciparum Sporozoites from Ookinetes In Vitro.
The first step was to efficiently produce oocysts. Briefly, stage V gametocytes from in vitro cultures were transferred into an exflagellation medium (FBS, 0.1% glucose, 0.1% sodium bicarbonate, and 0.022% xanthurenic acid), and after incubation the zygotes were transferred into a modified ookinete medium (20% FBS, RPMI medium, 0.25% trehalose, 0.25% dextrose, 0.04% sodium bicarbonate, 10 units/mL penicillin and 10 μg/mL streptomycin) and layered onto modified Matrigel-coated 8-well slides. To coat the 8-well slides, Matrigel was diluted with RPMI medium and poured into 8-well slides. These slides were incubated at 37° C. for 2 h and excess medium was removed. The Matrigel coated slides were further modified by seeding Drosophila Schneider S2 cells on top of the Matrigel before layering zygotes. Differentiated ookinetes invaded into the Matrigel. Undifferentiated zygotes and ookinetes that did not invade into the Matrigel were washed off during the change from ookinete to oocyst medium (Schneider's Drosophila medium, 20% FBS, 0.04% sodium bicarbonate, 0.25% trehalose, 50 μg/mL hypoxanthine, 0.1M HEPES, essential amino acids (1×, GIBCO), 0.04 μg/mL para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), 10 units/mL penicillin and 10 μg/mL streptomycin, 1.5% lipoproteins, 0.1% cholesterol, and vitamins (1×, GIBCO)) 24 h after incubation. In both ookinete and oocyst medium, S2 cells were added (
In vitro cultures were harvested on day 15 and/or day 18 by collecting the culture supernatant from the wells including unattached S2 cells. The numbers of morphologically developed PfSPZ were counted in a cellometer and an aliquot was stained using fluorescent anti-PfCSP mAb for confirmation (
Subsequently, a 3D transwell system was tested. In two independent culture experiments using this approach, 228,000 and 208,000 morphologically mature Pf SPZs were harvested from one 6-well plate culture. Initially, two commercially available 3D matrices that were found to be suitable for in vitro culture of oocysts were used. The 3D Life Hydrogel (Cellendes GmbH, Germany) is used to culture cells in a biomimetic 3D environment, and the AlgiMatrix™ 3D Culture System (Gibco/Invitrogen) is an animal origin-free bioscaffold that facilitates 3D cell culture. Both support Pf sporogony. 3D Life Hydrogel required galactosidase digestion for releasing Pf SPZ from the matrix while mature Pf SPZ were trapped in the Algimatrix matrix. Therefore, we developed a transwell insert based culture system in conjunction with Alvetex 3D culture technology (AMS Biotechnology (Europe) Limited, UK) as an alternative. Transwell inserts allowed two-compartment culturing once they were inserted into plate wells (
In two independent culture experiments, 228,000 and 208,000 morphologically developed PfSPZs were harvested from one 6-well plate culture using 6 modified inserts. This was a minimally 3-fold increase in yield compared to the numbers achieved with the 8-well slides (Tables 4, 5). In particular, Table 4 shows results of 8-well culture where as Table 5 shows results of transwell culture. This transwell insert culture condition offered several advantages as it: i) reduced the loss of Matrigel during media changes, ii) permitted repeat harvesting of PfSPZ from a single culture, iii) was amenable to coating the matrix with different extracellular matrix proteins, such as laminins and collagens, and iv) was suitable for scale up and automation using a suitable liquid handling system.
This result represents minimally a 3-fold increase in the numbers of mature Pf SPZ harvested from oocysts as compared to previous experiments.
aEstimated gametocytes ingested per mosquito.
bNumber per well (N = 3) per experiment.
cMean per mosquito midgut is the mean of the geometric mean of 74 independent SMFAs and N = 20-25 for each experiment (Li et al. in preparation)
dMean per well is the mean of the geometric means of 3 independent experiments.
Demonstration that In Vitro-Reared P. falciparum Sporozoites and P. falciparum Sporozoites Ontogenically Developed in Anopheles stephensi Mosquitoes Each Invade and Develop within a Human Hepatocyte Cell Line (HC-04) with Similar Efficiencies
In vitro-reared Pf SPZ were tested for their infectivity in a 6-day hepatocyte assay, which is used routinely to assess potency. The assay is typically carried out with Pf SPZ before and after cryopreservation. Fresh and cryopreserved Pf SPZ produce 6-day liver stage parasites that are morphologically identical, but there is a 5-25% loss of potency due to cryopreservation [5]. The in vitro-reared Pf SPZ are more akin to fresh mosquito-derived PfSPZ, therefore comparisons were made with readouts from fresh PfSPZ generated during manufacturing campaigns. In 7 consecutive production campaigns, 20.7-32.7 mature 6-day parasites expressing Pf MSP-1 developed from 50,000 mosquito-produced fresh Pf SPZ (Table 4). In vitro-reared PfSPZ were inoculated into 3 wells plated with HC-04 cells (a human hepatocyte cell line shown to support infection of Pf SPZ produced in vivo) [24, 25] and incubated for 6-days (
These results show methods for producing Pf oocysts in vitro with an efficiency 39 times greater than oocysts produced in mosquitoes. The in vitro-reared Pf SPZ invaded and developed to mature 6 day liver stage schizonts expressing Pf merozoite surface protein 1 with at least as good efficiency as Pf SPZ freshly dissected from mosquitoes.
In the foregoing, the present invention has been described with reference to suitable embodiments, but these embodiments are only for purposes of understanding the invention and various alterations or modifications are possible.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/529,812, filed Nov. 18, 2021, currently allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/561,814, filed Sep. 5, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,207,395, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/858,574, filed Dec. 29, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,441,646, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/095,360, filed Apr. 11, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,878,026, which is a continuation application of international application PCT/US2015/028890, filed May 1, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 61/987,834, filed May 2, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 62/016,981, filed Jun. 25, 2014, the contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
This invention was made with government support under grant number 1R43AI085740-01 awarded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and under Contract No: W81XWH-16-2-0025 awarded by the Department of Defense/Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP). The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7015036 | Prachumsri et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7229627 | Hoffman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
8043625 | Sim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8367810 | Sim et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8802919 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821896 | Sim et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8992944 | Sim et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9241982 | Sim et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9278125 | Chakravarty et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9616115 | Sim et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9642909 | Chakravarty et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9764016 | Janse et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9878026 | Eappen et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10272146 | Sim et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10441646 | Eappen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
11207395 | Eappen et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11883475 | Eappen et al. | Jan 2024 | B2 |
20050208078 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220822 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20120156245 | Hoffman et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120288525 | Chakravarty et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130251750 | Sim et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150313980 | Janse et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160158351 | Chakravarty et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160175417 | Sim et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160216276 | Felgner et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160287688 | Eappen et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160320404 | Felgner et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170252419 | Janse et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170274061 | Sim et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180161413 | Eappen et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20200113987 | Eappen et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20220257742 | Eappen et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Abraham, E.G., et al., “Analysis of the Plasmodium and Anopheles transcriptional repertoire during ookinete development and midgut invasion,” J Biol Chem 279(7):5573-5580, JBC Papers, United States (Feb. 2004). |
Adini, A. and Warburg, A., “Interaction of Plasmodium gallinaceum ookinetes and oocysts with extracellular matrix proteins,” Parasitology 119(Pt 4):331-336, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (Oct. 1999). |
Agnandji, S.T., et al., “A Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Infants,” The New England Journal of Medicine 367(24):2284-2295, Massachusetts Medical Society, United States (Dec. 2012). |
Agnandji, S.T., et al., “First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children,” The New England Journal of Medicine 365(20):1863-1875, Massachusetts Medical Society, United States (Nov. 2011). |
Al-Olayan, E.M., et al., “Complete Development of Mosquito Phases of the Malaria Parasite in Vitro,” Science 295(5555):677-679, American Association for the Advancement of Science, United States (Jan. 2002). |
Alonso, P.L., et al., “A Research Agenda for Malaria Eradication: Vaccines,” PLoS Medicine 8(1):e1000398:1-10, Public Library of Science, United States (Jan. 2011). |
Benedict, M.Q., et al., “Methylparaben in Anopheles gambiae s.l. sugar meals increases longevity and malaria oocyst abundance but is not a preferred diet,” J Insect Physiol 55(3):197-204, Elsevier Ltd., England (Mar. 2009). |
Benton, G., et al., “Advancing Science and Technology via 3D Culture on Basement Membrane Matrix,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 221(1):18-25, Wiley-Liss, United States (Oct. 2009). |
Billker, O., “Calcium and a calcium-dependent protein kinase regulate gamete formation and mosquito transmission in a malaria parasite,” Cell 117(4):503-514, Cell Press, United States (May 2004). |
Boston Consulting Group on behalf of the Malaria Vaccine Initiative PATH, “Market Assessment for Malaria Vaccines, Jan. 2005,” accessed at http://www.malariavaccine.org/sites/www.malariavaccine.org/files/content/resources/files/Market-Assessment-18Jan05-LB-BOS_000.pdf, accessed on Mar. 25, 2016, 167 pages. |
Bounkeua, V., et al., “In vitro generation of Plasmodium falciparum ookinetes,” Am J Trop Med Hyg 83 (6):1187-1194, The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, United States (Dec. 2010). |
Chuang, I., et al., “DNA prime/Adenovirus boost malaria vaccine encoding P. falciparum CSP and AMA1 induces sterile protection associated with cell-mediated immunity,” PLoS One 8(2):e55571:1-15, Public Library of Science, United States (Feb. 2013). |
Cullen, K.A. and Arguin, P.M., “Malaria Surveillance—United States, 2011,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries 62(5):1-17, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States (Nov. 2013). |
Dessens, J.T., et al., “SOAP, a novel malaria ookinete protein involved in mosquito midgut invasion and oocyst development,” Mol Microbiol 49(2):319-329, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., England (Jul. 2003). |
Garcia, C.R., et al., “Comparative cost models of a liquid nitrogen vapor phase (LNVP) cold chain-distributed cryopreserved malaria vaccine vs. a conventional vaccine,” Vaccine 31(2):380-386, Elsevier Ltd., England (Nov. 2012). |
Hoffman, S.L., et al., “Development of a Metabolically Active, Non-Replicating Sporozoite Vaccine to Prevent Plasmodium falciparum Malaria,” Human Vaccines 6(1):97-106, Landes Bioscience, United States (Jan. 2010). |
Hoffman, S.L., et al., “Protection of humans against malaria by immunization with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites,” J Infect Dis 185:1155-1164, Infectious Diseases Society of America, United States (Apr. 2002). |
Hughes, C.S., et al., “Matrigel: a Complex Protein Mixture Required for Optimal Growth of Cell Culture,” Proteomics 10(9):1886-1890, Wiley-VCH, Germany (May 2010). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/028890, ISA/US, Commissioner for Patents, Alexandria, Virginia, mailed on Jul. 16, 2015, 12 pages. |
Kester, K.E., et al., “Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2a Trial of Falciparum Malaria Vaccines RTS,S/AS01B and RTS,S/AS02A in Malaria-Naive Adults: Safety, Efficacy, and Immunologic Associates of Protection,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases 200(3):337-346, Infectious Diseases Society of America, United States (Aug. 2009). |
Klenow, P.J., “Learning Curves and the Cyclical Behavior of Manufacturing Industries,” Review of Economic Dynamics 1:531-550, Academic Press, United States (Apr. 1998). |
Lieberman, M.B., “The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries,” The RAND Journal of Economics 15(2):213-228, The RAND Corporation, United States (1984). |
Mali, S., et al., “Malaria Surveillance—United States, 2010,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries 61(2):1-17, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States (Mar. 2012). |
March, S., et al., “A Microscale Human Liver Platform that Supports the Hepatic Stages of Plasmodium falciparum and vivax,” Cell Host Microbe 14(1):104-115, Elsevier Inc., United States (Jul. 2013). |
Matuschewski, K., “Getting infectious: formation and maturation of Plasmodium sporozoites in the Anopheles vector,” Cellular Microbiology 8(10):1547-1556, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., England (Oct. 2006). |
Mordmüller, B., et al., “Safety and immunogenicity of the malaria vaccine candidate GMZ2 in malaria-exposed, adult individuals from Lambaréné, Gabon,” Vaccine 28(41):6698-6703, Elsevier B.V., Netherlands (Sep. 2010). |
Mutapi, F., et al., “Infection and Treatment Immunizations for Successful Parasite Vaccines,” Trends in Parasitology 29(3):135-141, Elsevier Ltd., England (Mar. 2013). |
Olotu, A., et al., “Four-Year Efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E and its Interaction with Malaria Exposure,” The New England Journal of Medicine 368(12):1111-1120, Massachusetts Medical Society, United States (Mar. 2013). |
Palacpac, N.M.Q., et al., “Phase 1b Randomized Trial and Follow-Up Study in Uganda of the Blood-Stage Malaria Vaccine Candidate BK-SE36,” PLoS One 8(5):e64073:1-14, Public Library of Science, United States (May 2013). |
Plowe, C.V., et al., “The potential role of vaccines in the elimination of falciparum malaria and the eventual eradication of malaria,” J Infect Dis 200:1646-1649, Infectious Disease Society of America, United States (Dec. 2009). |
Pradel, G., “Proteins of the Malaria Parasite Sexual Stages: Expression, Function and Potential for Transmission Blocking Strategies,” Parasitology 134(Pt 14):1911-1929, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (Dec. 2007). |
Richie, T.L. and Saul, A., “Progress and challenges for malaria vaccines,” Nature 415(6872):694-701, Macmillan Magazines Ltd., England (Feb. 2002). |
Roestenberg, M., et al., “Protection against a malaria challenge by sporozoite inoculation,” New England Journal of Medicine 361(5):468-477, Massachusetts Medical Society, United States (Jul. 2009). |
Roestenberg, M., et al., “Controlled Human Malaria Infections by Intradermal Injection of Cryopreserved Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoites,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 88(1):5-13, The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, United States (Jan. 2013). |
Sachs, J. and Malaney, P., “The Economic and Social Burden of Malaria,” Nature 415(6872):680-685, Macmillan Magazines Ltd., England (Feb. 2002). |
Sack, B.K., et al., “Model for in vivo assessment of humoral protection against malaria sporozoite challenge by passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies and immune serum,” Infection and Immunity 82(2):808-817, American Society for Microbiology, United States (Feb. 2014). |
Sattabongkot, J., et al., “Establishment of a Human Hepatocyte Line that Supports in Vitro Development of the Exo-Erythrocytic Stages of the Malaria Parasites Plasmodium falciparum and P. Vivax,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 74(5):708-715, The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, United States (May 2006). |
Savransky, T., et al., Development And Validation Of An In Vitro, Cell-Free Method Of Culturing Mosquito-Stage Plasmodium falciparum, Abstract #1446, Astmh 91(5S):440, The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, United States (Nov. 2014), 1 page. |
Schneider, I., “Cell Lines Derived from Late Embryonic Stages of Drosophila melanogaster,” J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 27(2):353-365, Cambridge Univ. Press for the Company of Biologists Ltd, Great Britain (1972). |
Schuster, F.L., “Cultivation of Plasmodium spp.,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews 15(3):355-364, American Society for Microbiology, United States (2002). |
Seder, R.A., et al., “Protection against Malaria by Intravenous Immunization with a Nonreplicating Sporozoite Vaccine,” Scienceexpress 1-12, American Association for the Advancement of Science, United States (Aug. 8, 2013); later published as Science 341(6152):1359-1365 (Sep. 20, 2013). |
Sheehy, S.H., et al., “Optimising Controlled Human Malaria Infection Studies using Cryopreserved P. falciparum Parasites Administered by Needle and Syringe,” PLoS One 8(6):e65960:1-9, Public Library of Science, United States (Jun. 2013). |
Sirima, S.B., et al., “Protection against malaria by MSP3 candidate vaccine,” N Engl J Med 365(11):1062-1064, Massachusetts Medical Society, United States (Sep. 2011). |
Terzakis, J.A., et al., “The transformation of the Plasmodium gallinaceum oocyst in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes,” J Cell Biol 34(1):311-326, Rockefeller University Press, United States (1967). |
Trager, W. and Jensen, J.B., “Human Malaria Parasites in Continuous Culture,” Science 193(4254):673-675, American Association for the Advancement of Science, United States (1976). |
Vanderberg, J.P., “Development of infectivity by the Plasmodium berghei sporozoite,” J Parasitol 61(1):43-50, American Society of Parasitologists, United States (1975). |
Vaughan, J.A., et al., “Sporogonic Development of Cultured Plasmodium falciparum in Six Species of Laboratory-Reared Anopheles Mosquitoes,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 51(2):233-243, The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, United States (1994). |
Vaughan, A.M., et al., “Complete Plasmodium falciparum liver stage development in liver-chimeric mice,” J Clin Invest 122(10):3618-3628, American Society for Clinical Investigation, United States (Oct. 2012). |
Vaughan, A.M., et al., “Development of humanized mouse models to study human malaria parasite infection,” Future Microbiol 7(5):657-665, Future Medicine Ltd., England (May 2012). |
Warburg, A. and Miller, L.H., “Sporogonic Development of a Malaria Parasite in Vitro,” Science 255(5043):448-450, American Association for the Advancement of Science, United States (1992). |
Warburg, A. and Schneider, I., “In Vitro Culture of the Mosquito Stages of Plasmodium falciparum,” Experimental Parasitology 76(2):121-126, Academic Press, Inc., United States (1993). |
Wikipedia, “List of countries by number of military and paramilitary personnel,” https://en.wikipedia.org, accessed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_size_of_armed_forces, accessed on Mar. 25, 2016, 11 pages. |
World Health Organization, “World Malaria Report 2008,” http://apps.who.int, accessed at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241563697_eng.pdf, accessed on Mar. 25, 2016, 215 pages. |
World Health Organization, World Malaria Report 2013, available at http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2013/en/, accessed on Mar. 24, 2016, 284 pages. |
World Health Organization, “Rainbow Table Reference List,” http://www.who.int, accessed at http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/links/Rainbow/en/index.html, accessed on Mar. 24, 2016, 28 pages. |
Yeh, S. and Rubin, E.S., “A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves,” Energy Economics 34:762-771, Elsevier B. V., Netherlands (May 2012). |
Hillyer J.F., et al., “Efficiency of salivary gland invasion by malaria sporozoites is controlled by rapid sporozoite destruction in mosquito hemocoel,” Int J Parasitol. 37(6):673-681, Elsevier, Netherlands (2007). |
Kennedy M., et al., “A rapid and scalable density gradient purification method for Plasmodium Sporozoites,” Malaria Journal 11:421, Biomed Central Ltd., United Kingdom (Dec. 2012), 10 pages. |
King J.G., et al., “Members of the salivary gland surface protein (SGS) family are major immunogenic components of mosquito saliva,” J Biol Chem. 286(47):40824-40834, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, United States (Nov. 2011). |
Menard, R., “Knockout malaria vaccine?” Nature 433:113-114, Nature Publishing Group, England (2005). |
Vaughan, J.A., et al., “Population Dynamics of Plasmodium falicparum sporogony in laboratory-infected Anopheles gambiae,” J. Parasitol.78(4):716-724, Elsevier, Netherlands (1992). |
Van Schaijk, B.C.L., et al., “A genetically attenuated malaria vaccine candidate based on P. falciparum b9/slarp gene-deficient sporozoites,” eLife 3:e03582, elife Sciences Publications, Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom (Nov. 2014), 18 pages. |
Mikolajczak, S.A. et al., “A Next-generation Genetically Attenuated Plasmodium falciparum Parasite Created by Triple Gene Deletion,” Mol. Ther. 22(9):1707-1715, The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy, Elsevier Inc., Cambridge, United Kingdom (Sep. 2014). |
Van Schaijk, B.C.L., et al., “Gene Disruption of Plasmodium falciparum p52 Results in Attenuation of Malaria Liver Stage Development in Cultured Primary Human Hepatocytes,” PLoS One 3(10):e3549, San Francisco, United States (Oct. 2008), 10 pages. |
Vanbuskirk, K.M., et al., “Preerythrocytic, live-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum vaccine candidates by design,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(31):13004-13009, Washington, DC, United States (Aug. 2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240173393 A1 | May 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62016981 | Jun 2014 | US | |
61987834 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17529812 | Nov 2021 | US |
Child | 18532731 | US | |
Parent | 16561814 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 17529812 | US | |
Parent | 15858574 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16561814 | US | |
Parent | 15095360 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15858574 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2015/028890 | May 2015 | WO |
Child | 15095360 | US |