The present specification relates to inflatable helmets, particularly but not exclusively for bike riding and other leisure pursuits such as skateboarding.
Conventional hard cycling helmets give reasonable protection to a bike rider in the event of the rider hitting his head against a hard surface, such as when the rider falls or is thrown from their bike. However, such helmets are bulky, meaning that they can be inconvenient to carry around, and users may be tempted not to wear a helmet for this reason.
Various designs of inflatable helmets have been proposed, which can be deflated to a more compact and convenient form. However, such helmets may not offer the same protection as a hard helmet. A helmet protects the wearer both by spreading an impact over a larger area, and by absorbing energy by deformation. Some known inflatable helmets do not have sufficient rigidity, to spread an impact, and deform so easily, that very little energy is absorbed.
The object of the present invention is to provide a helmet than can be deflated to a more compact form which offers effective head protection.
According to the present disclosure, there is provided a helmet according to claim 1.
The invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the drawings, of which:
Although this disclosure refers to specific embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the subject matter set forth in the accompanying claims.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In a deflated state, when there is little or no air in the helmet, the inflatable chambers 22 are each compressed to a generally flat state, lying in the same plane as each surrounding flange 26. Each longitudinal member 20 lies flat against the neighbouring longitudinal members 20, so that the whole structure of the helmet 10 has a flattened shape occupying a smaller volume.
When air is forced into the helmet, each inflatable chamber 22 expands, so that the walls 23, 23′ bow out around volume 24. The connecting struts 30 also expand, as will be described in greater details below. The width of each longitudinal member 20 increases, and the distance separating neighbouring longitudinal members 20 increases, so that the structure expands or concertinas out in one direction (i.e. perpendicular to the plane in which each flange lies). The resulting inflated shape is now similar to a traditional helmet and can be worn by a user.
Referring particularly to
The positions of the connecting struts 30 are distributed over the length of the helmet, so that when considered from the side elevation, the number of connecting struts 30 that coincide is kept to a minimum; that is, connecting struts on either side of a longitudinal members ideally do not share a common axis (though their axes may be parallel). This staggered, offset or irregular distribution of the connecting struts increases the stability when external forces are applied. Ideally the position of the connecting struts 30 along the lengths of the longitudinal members 20 is generally alternated to give an elliptical-shaped distribution (or alternatively, a diamond-shaped or lattice-shaped distribution). In one example, the connecting struts 30 join the longitudinal members 20 at intersections 51 in
Each outer-ridge 26 will remain in a generally vertical position around each inflatable chamber 22. The strength of each longitudinal member 20 is increased by the addition of the outer-ridge 26, acting as a geometric structure to support and enclose the forces of the inflated chamber reducing the longitudinal member 20 from flexing.
The outer-ridge also reduces the surface area, and in the event of a fall or a crash, reduces the friction between the helmet and the ground or other surfaces, and thus prevents a sudden deceleration of the head which can put stress on the user's neck. The flange also protects the inflatable chambers from external abrasion during daily use.
Referring to
As the helmet is inflated and the inflatable chambers 22 and the connecting struts 30 are filled with air, the connecting strut 30 expands to a more tubular shape, having a generally elliptical cross section (though the section could have straighter sections and corners, for example a rhombic shape, and the section can change along the length of the connecting strut). Thus forming a complex arrangement of structural supports interlinking the cross-fluted chambers to form a hollow geometric structure. The addition of the air effectively unfolds this structure creating a pre-stressed geometrically formed protective cage. At the same time, the distance between the walls 23 of the inflatable chambers 22 increases, and the angle θ that the connecting strut 30 makes with the walls 23 increases from 0° to closer to 45°, in the manner of a hinges, so that the structure as a whole, considered in plan acts like a network of folding parallelograms, this being illustrated in
Referring to
In general then, the structure of the helmet is a one where, considered in plan, the longitudinal members and connecting strut members expand from a deflated state where the longitudinal members and connecting strut members are lying approximately parallel state with a small total width, to an expanded lattice-type structure, with the longitudinal members still parallel, and the connecting strut members all inclined to the longitudinal members, to give the structure the required width. The longitudinal members and connecting strut members form a lattice with quadrilateral spaces 55 between the longitudinal members and connecting strut members. Ideally, the connecting strut members will all be inclined to the same degree, though also the lengths and/or angles of connecting strut members could be varied to creates different separations between longitudinal members or even cause the longitudinal members to diverge from a parallel arrangement. As well as having laterally non-aligned anchor or intersection points with the longitudinal members, the connecting strut members ideally alternate so that (as shown in
The helmet is ideally composed of a single material made as a single integral part. The material is chosen such that ideally it does not stretch by more than approximately 5%, so that form is constrained so that, once inflated, it cannot deform (or balloon) too much, thus maintaining its shape and thereby providing an effective protective shell that can sustain suitable elongation-to-break tolerances. Suitable materials are high-density polyethylene (HDPE or PEHD), Nylon or material with similar properties, but can also be achieved by the use of carbon fibre, and rubber with an internal Kevlar, polyester or nylon weave. The material can be formed into the helmet shape either by printing or by other flat formed process, injection moulding, or by forming together flat elements and then bonding together. These materials also have a suitable tensile strength and resilience, without being brittle or liable to puncture, both under normal use, repeated inflation and deflation cycles, and in the event of an impact.
More stretchable material could be used, although it may be necessary to provide greater internal bracing (such as a polyester, nylon or carbon fibre woven or drop stitch bracing), which prevents over inflation and maintains the correct internal pressure.
Using these types of material for the helmet allows the helmet to be formed as a single-skinned shape (with a single continuous topological surface).
Typically, the flanges 26 the walls of the inflatable chambers 22 and connecting struts 30 comprise a single layer of material, formed as a single homogenous piece, at an approximately constant thickness of 0.7 to 1 mm. A suitable method of manufacturing the helmet is by 3D printing technique, for example fused deposition, forming the helmet in its compressed state, though other techniques such as selective laser sintering, stereo lithography and yet-to-be developed methods may be similarly employed.
The internal bracing straps can be formed simultaneously. This technique is particularly suitable for forming material to the required tolerance to produce opposite walls of the inflatable chamber 22 and the connecting strut 30 the walls that lie nearly flat against each other (and likewise between the neighbouring walls of the inflatable chambers 22 and the connecting strut 30) with little separation in the uninflated, compressed state, but still remain distinct and without the adjacent walls adhering to each other. The helmet could also be formed by injection moulding or printed in a state that isn't completely flat and compressed.
Ideally, an adjustable chin strap may be attached at two points on opposite sides of the helmets, so that the inflated helmet is held firmly on the user's head when in use, with lugs or fixing points formed in the helmet for this purpose.
The helmet is formed as a completely sealed unit with a valve that can be used to inflate the helmet. Typically, this will be a standard Schrader valve, a common component to cycling due to its reliability. It also means the helmet can be inflated with a normal standard bicycle pump.
An excessive amount of pressure applied to the helmet, either during its inflation, or as a result of a fall or impact against the helmet, can damage the material of the helmet, and possible lead to earlier, sudden and catastrophic failure, either during normal use or during an impact, so that the helmet is either rendered useless, or does not provide sufficient impact protection.
Referring to
The shape and thickness of the wall material at the circular area 42, and the configuration and depth of the rupture lines 46, is formed such that when a predetermined pressure is met or exceeded, the rupture lines and/or weak point will tear, and this tear will quickly spread along part of the rupture lines. When this has occurred, the rupture will be very evident since the brightly coloured circular region 45 will be ripped, distorted or not visible at all.
The necessary shape and thickness of the wall material at the circular area 42, and the configuration and depth of the rupture lines 46, may be determined by producing a range of configurations by varying the parameters of shape, thickness, configuration, depth etc for a particular material, and destructively testing each configuration until one is found that ruptures at the required pressure. In addition to the absolute release valve a secondary release valve is incorporated into the pressurising valve as a ‘controlled release system’. This controls the maximum amount of air pressure allowed to enter the helmet, so protecting the structure from over inflation very precisely to within approximately plus or minus 8 psi of the maximum safety pressure. This valve will also allow the controlled and counter-reactive autonomous release of air during impact via the valves pre-primed and calibrated die-spring load release, thereby reducing impact force by diverting this force by way of this reactionary device, creating an anti-recoil energy absorption system. This also prevents absolute destruction of the unit by avoiding added stresses to occur during impact and thereby increasing the overall safety factor of the helmet.
Although certain illustrative embodiments have been described in detail above, variations and modifications exist within the scope and spirit of this disclosure as described and as defined in the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1415362.1 | Aug 2016 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/506,989, filed Feb. 27, 2017, which is a National Stage Entry of International Application PCT/EP2015/069881 which claims priority to, and the benefit of, Great Britain Patent Application No. GB 1415362.1, filed Aug. 29, 2016, the entirety of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15506989 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 17215154 | US |