One common treatment for male erectile dysfunction is the implantation of a penile prosthesis. An exemplary inflatable penile prosthesis 10 is shown in
During use, the patient actuates the pump 16 and fluid is transferred from the reservoir 14 to the pump 16 through tubing 20. The fluid travels through the pump 16 and into the cylinders 12 through tubing 18. This results in the inflation of the cylinders 12 and thereby produces the desired penis rigidity for a normal erection. Then, when the patient desires to deflate the cylinders 12, a valve assembly within the pump 16 is actuated in a manner such that the fluid in the cylinders 12 is released back into the reservoir 14. This deflation then returns the penis to a flaccid state.
The pump and valve assembly 16 includes fluid pathways allowing the flow of fluid to and from the reservoir 14, as well as to and from the cylinders 12. In some designs this fluid flow is controlled by one or more poppet valves positioned in the fluid pathways within the housing of the pump and valve assembly 16.
A compressible pump bulb 22 is typically attached to the housing 24 of the pump assembly 16 and is in fluid communication with the various fluid pathways. In order to inflate the cylinders 12, the compressible pump bulb 22 is actuated by the patient, thereby urging fluid in the bulb 22 past the poppet valves into the cylinders 12. In order to deflate the cylinders 12, the valve housing 24 is grasped and squeezed, such as at button 26, through the patient's tissue, causing the various poppet valves to unseat and allow fluid to flow back to the reservoir 14 through a ball check valve (i.e., bypass valve) contained in the housing 24.
As the flow of fluid is continuously modulated by the throttling of the valve 30, the ball 32 moves rapidly (vibrates) toward and away from the valve seat 36, as indicated by arrow 46. This vibration induces an audible sound outside of the pump 16. As the velocity of the flow decreases in response to decreasing pressure within the cylinders 12, the frequency of the sound increases, eventually sounding like a high pitched scream (approximately 3000 Hz) toward the end of the deflation operation.
The present invention generally relates to solutions to the bypass valve noise problem during deflation operations of the inflatable penile prosthesis.
One embodiment of the invention is directed to a bypass valve of an implantable pump of an inflatable penile prosthesis that utilizes frictional resistance to movement of the poppet to reduce noise during deflation operations.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, audible noise during deflation operations is decreased by decreasing the frequency at which the spring and poppet system naturally vibrate through an increase in the mass of the poppet and/or a decrease in the spring constant of the spring as compared to bypass valves of the prior art.
These and other features will become apparent with a careful review of the drawings and the corresponding detailed description.
The frequency of a vibrating spring mass system is proportional to √{square root over (K/M)}, where K=the spring constant and M=the system mass. The bypass valve 30 of
Conventional bypass valves, such as that depicted in
While decreasing the spring constant and/or increasing the mass of the ball will decrease the system vibrating frequency, such a change would not affect the actual sound level (i.e., amplitude). However, the human ear perceives the loudness of sound differently at different frequencies. This effect is seen in the Robinson-Davidson equal loudness curves adopted by the International Standards Organization as the basis for ISO 266:1987, shown in
Since the sound levels generated by conventional bypass valves during deflation of the penile prosthesis cylinders are low and the primary frequencies of the generated sounds are in the range of 3,000 Hz, modifying the spring constant and poppet mass can have a significant affect on the sound frequency and therefore the perceived loudness. Embodiments of the invention are directed to decreasing the system vibrating frequency such that the sound generated during cylinder deflation is perceived as having a lower amplitude than that generated by the conventional bypass valve. This is accomplished by increasing the mass of the poppet 31 and/or decreasing the spring constant of the spring 40.
In accordance with one embodiment, the mass of the poppet 31 is increased relative to the conventional design discussed above through an increase in the size of the valve member 32 (e.g., greater than 3/32 of an inch) of the poppet 31. In one exemplary embodiment the poppet 31 includes a spherical valve member 32 having a diameter of ⅛ of an inch or more. The poppet 31 can take on other non-spherical shapes, such as that described below, that have a larger volume than conventional valve members. Thus, even if the material forming the valve member 32 and the spring 40 are conventional, the larger volume valve member 32 will have greater mass than the conventional design resulting in a reduction to the frequency of vibration of the system and a perceived reduction in the noise level.
In another embodiment, the poppet 31 is formed of a material that is more dense than the synthetic sapphire of conventional poppets 32. For example, the valve member 32 can be formed of stainless steel or other relatively dense material (e.g., titanium carbide) that is not subject to corrosion and is appropriate for human implantation. The increase in the mass of the otherwise conventional poppet 31 and spring 40 system, will result in a decrease in the frequency of vibration of the system and a perceived reduction in the noise level.
In accordance with another embodiment, the spring constant of the spring 40 is decreased to provide a reduction to the frequency of vibration of the poppet 31 and spring 40 system.
Embodiments of the invention include setting the frequency of vibration of the spring 40 and poppet 31 system to less than 2500 Hz through an increase in the density of the poppet 31, an increase in the volume of the poppet 31, and/or a decrease in the spring constant of spring 40. In another embodiment, the frequency of vibration of the spring 40 and poppet 31 system is set to below 1500 Hz using the same techniques.
In accordance with one exemplary embodiment, the frequency of vibration of the spring 40 and poppet 31 system is decreased significantly below the 3000 Hz frequency of the conventional valve member and spring systems by increasing the mass of the poppet 31 to approximately 5 times that of the conventional valve member and by reducing the spring constant of the spring 40 by one-third of that of the conventional spring. In one embodiment, the mass of poppet 31 is increased by forming the valve member 32 out of stainless steel and increasing the diameter of the spherical valve member 32 to ⅛ of an inch. These changes in the mass of the valve member and the spring constant relative to the conventional bypass valve result in a decrease in the frequency of the sound generated during cylinder deflation by approximately 63%. Thus, a conventional bypass valve sound of 10 Db and at a frequency of 3000 Hz that is generated during cylinder deflation can be reduced to 1100 Hz. This reduction in the frequency is perceived by the human ear as a further reduction in loudness by approximately 67%.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, vibratory movement of the poppet within the bypass cavity is resisted to thereby reduce noise that is generated during cylinder deflation operations. In general, frictional resistance is applied to the poppet to impede vibratory movement of the poppet relative to the valve seat.
In accordance with one embodiment, the poppet 52 includes a sealing position, shown in
The poppet 52 also includes a deflating position, shown in
The stem 56 extends from a side 62 of the valve member 54 that is opposite the side 58 designed to seal the valve seat 36. The stem 56 is configured to engage a portion of the spring 51 during cylinder deflation operations. This contact with the spring 51 occurs at a location of the spring 51 where there is relative movement between the spring 51 and the stem 56. As a result, a frictional force is generated at the contact point that resists movement of the poppet 52 relative to the spring 51. This frictional resistance to movement of the poppet 52 dampens the vibratory movement of the poppet 52 during cylinder deflation operations and reduces noise.
The amount of frictional resistance between the poppet 52 and the spring 51 depends on the surfaces of the spring 51 and the stem 56, the contact area, and the pressure applied between the stem 56 and the spring 51. The amount of frictional resistance to movement of the poppet 52 can be set based on empirical testing to provide the desired damping of the vibratory movement of the poppet 52 and noise reduction based on the flow of fluid that is generated during cylinder deflation operations.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In the embodiment of the bypass valve 50 provided in
In one embodiment, the spring 51 has a generally cylindrical shape when the poppet 52 is in the sealing position (
In the embodiment of the bypass valve 50 shown in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application claims priority to U.S. application No. 60/865,325, filed Nov. 10, 2006 and entitled “Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Bypass Valve Noise Reduction.” The identified provisional patent application is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
988120 | Lott | Mar 1911 | A |
1863057 | Innes | Jun 1932 | A |
2586575 | Arthur | Feb 1952 | A |
2786718 | Middlestadt | Mar 1957 | A |
3228731 | Valentine | Jan 1966 | A |
3312215 | Silber | Apr 1967 | A |
3344791 | Foderick | Oct 1967 | A |
3397699 | Kohl | Aug 1968 | A |
3503400 | Osthagen et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3510029 | Doyle | May 1970 | A |
3642004 | Osthagen et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3731670 | Loe | May 1973 | A |
3797478 | Walsh et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3812841 | Isaacson | May 1974 | A |
3853122 | Strauch et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3954102 | Buuck | May 1976 | A |
4009711 | Uson | Mar 1977 | A |
4201202 | Finney et al. | May 1980 | A |
4204530 | Finney | May 1980 | A |
4222377 | Burton | Sep 1980 | A |
4224934 | Scott et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4235227 | Yamanaka | Nov 1980 | A |
4256093 | Helms et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4267829 | Burton et al. | May 1981 | A |
4318396 | Finney | Mar 1982 | A |
4342308 | Trick | Aug 1982 | A |
4344434 | Robertson | Aug 1982 | A |
4353360 | Finney et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4360010 | Finney | Nov 1982 | A |
4364379 | Finney | Dec 1982 | A |
4369771 | Trick | Jan 1983 | A |
4378792 | Finney | Apr 1983 | A |
4383525 | Scott et al. | May 1983 | A |
4399811 | Finney et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4399812 | Whitehead | Aug 1983 | A |
4404968 | Evans, Sr. | Sep 1983 | A |
4407278 | Burton et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4412530 | Burton | Nov 1983 | A |
4424807 | Evans, Sr. | Jan 1984 | A |
4437457 | Trick et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4441491 | Evans, Sr. | Apr 1984 | A |
4449520 | Palomar | May 1984 | A |
4453536 | Abild | Jun 1984 | A |
4457335 | Trick | Jul 1984 | A |
4489732 | Hasson | Dec 1984 | A |
4523584 | Yachia et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4532920 | Finney | Aug 1985 | A |
4537183 | Fogarty | Aug 1985 | A |
4550719 | Finney et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4550720 | Trick | Nov 1985 | A |
4553959 | Hickey et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4558693 | Lash et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4559931 | Fischell | Dec 1985 | A |
4566446 | Fogarty | Jan 1986 | A |
4571241 | Christopher | Feb 1986 | A |
4572168 | Fischell | Feb 1986 | A |
4574792 | Trick | Mar 1986 | A |
4587954 | Haber | May 1986 | A |
4590927 | Porter et al. | May 1986 | A |
4596242 | Fischell | Jun 1986 | A |
4602625 | Yachia et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604994 | Sealfon | Aug 1986 | A |
4611584 | Finney | Sep 1986 | A |
4622958 | Finney | Nov 1986 | A |
4632435 | Polyak | Dec 1986 | A |
4651721 | Mikulich et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4653485 | Fischell | Mar 1987 | A |
4664100 | Rudloff | May 1987 | A |
4665903 | Whitehead | May 1987 | A |
4671261 | Fischell | Jun 1987 | A |
4682583 | Burton et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4682589 | Finney | Jul 1987 | A |
4710169 | Christopher | Dec 1987 | A |
4718410 | Hakky | Jan 1988 | A |
4724830 | Fischell | Feb 1988 | A |
4726360 | Trick et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4730607 | Fischell | Mar 1988 | A |
4766889 | Trick et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4773403 | Daly | Sep 1988 | A |
4782826 | Fogarty | Nov 1988 | A |
4790298 | Trick | Dec 1988 | A |
4791917 | Finney | Dec 1988 | A |
4807608 | Levius | Feb 1989 | A |
4829990 | Thuroff et al. | May 1989 | A |
4829991 | Boeck | May 1989 | A |
4850963 | Sparks et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4881530 | Frick | Nov 1989 | A |
4895139 | Hauschild et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4917110 | Trick | Apr 1990 | A |
4932938 | Goldberg et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4944732 | Russo | Jul 1990 | A |
4958630 | Rosenbluth et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4968294 | Salama | Nov 1990 | A |
4988357 | Koss | Jan 1991 | A |
5010882 | Polyak et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5030199 | Barwick et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5034009 | Mouchel | Jul 1991 | A |
5041092 | Barwick | Aug 1991 | A |
5048510 | Hauschild et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5048511 | Rosenbluth et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5052383 | Chabert | Oct 1991 | A |
5062416 | Stucks | Nov 1991 | A |
5062417 | Cowen | Nov 1991 | A |
5063914 | Cowen | Nov 1991 | A |
5067485 | Cowen | Nov 1991 | A |
5074849 | Sachse | Dec 1991 | A |
5085650 | Giglio | Feb 1992 | A |
5088980 | Leighton | Feb 1992 | A |
5090424 | Simon et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5101813 | Trick | Apr 1992 | A |
5112295 | Zinner et al. | May 1992 | A |
5114398 | Trick et al. | May 1992 | A |
5129880 | Grundei | Jul 1992 | A |
5131906 | Chen | Jul 1992 | A |
5141509 | Burton et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5158111 | Lambert et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167611 | Cowan | Dec 1992 | A |
5171272 | Levius | Dec 1992 | A |
5186180 | Bellas | Feb 1993 | A |
5250020 | Bley | Oct 1993 | A |
5263981 | Polyak et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5328293 | Keefe | Jul 1994 | A |
5344388 | Maxwell et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5433694 | Lim | Jul 1995 | A |
5518499 | Agar | May 1996 | A |
5595331 | Leistner | Jan 1997 | A |
5678768 | Gager et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5704895 | Scott et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5851176 | Willard | Dec 1998 | A |
5893826 | Slama | Apr 1999 | A |
5895424 | Steele, Sr. et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6171233 | Willard | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6443887 | Derus et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6533719 | Kuyava et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6558315 | Kuyava | May 2003 | B1 |
6723042 | Almli et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730017 | Henkel et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733527 | Koyfman | May 2004 | B2 |
6929599 | Westrum | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935847 | Kuyava et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6991601 | Kuyava et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7066877 | Kuyava | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066878 | Eid | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7169103 | Ling et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7244227 | Morningstar | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250026 | Kuyava | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020033564 | Koyfman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020082473 | Henkel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082709 | Almli et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091302 | Kuyava et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030028076 | Kuyava et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040193005 | Almli | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220447 | Morningstar | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220448 | Henkel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050250982 | Kuyava | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060135845 | Kuyava | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2537506 | Aug 1975 | DE |
0051420 | May 1982 | EP |
0065853 | Dec 1982 | EP |
0682923 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0925764 | Jun 1999 | EP |
2160777 | Jan 1986 | GB |
2192546 | Jan 1988 | GB |
WO8000302 | Mar 1980 | WO |
WO8500513 | Feb 1985 | WO |
WO9203107 | Mar 1992 | WO |
WO9404095 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO02051339 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080114202 A1 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60865325 | Nov 2006 | US |