Inflatable reflector antenna for space based radars

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6650304
  • Patent Number
    6,650,304
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 28, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 18, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A space deployable antenna that includes an inflatable envelope, a cylindrical reflector formed on a wall of the envelope, a catenary support frame for maintaining the cylindrical shape of the cylindrical reflector, and a feed array support structure connected to the catenary support frame.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE




The disclosed invention relates generally to antenna systems, and more particularly to an inflated reflector antenna structure.




BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE




Space deployable antenna structures include metal mesh designs that are heavy, bulky, difficult to package and deploy, and generally expensive to construct. Further, such mesh antennas would be difficult to implement as large antennas.




Other space deployable antenna structures include inflatable antennas wherein an inflatable structure forms a reflective surface. Known inflatable antenna structures have an antenna profile that tends to change, which impairs the properties of the antenna.




SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE




An antenna is disclosed, which includes an inflatable flexible enclosed envelope having a curved wall transparent to RF, the curved wall ending at first and second opposing edges. An RF reflective coating is disposed on the curved wall. A catenary support frame supports the first and second edges and maintains the curved wall in a predetermined shape when the envelope is inflated. A support structure is provided to support a feed array illuminating the RF reflective coating with RF energy.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING




These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment thereof, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic perspective view of an antenna structure in accordance with the invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic elevational cross-sectional view depicting the coatings on walls of an inflatable envelope of the antenna structure of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a schematic elevational view of the feed array support structure of the antenna structure of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 4

is a schematic elevational view illustrating the operation of the antenna structure of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 5

is a schematic view illustrating a stage in the deployment of the antenna structure of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 6

is a schematic view illustrating a further stage in the deployment of the antenna structure of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 7

is a schematic view illustrating another stage in the deployment of the antenna structure of FIG.


1


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE





FIG. 1

illustrates an exemplary embodiment of an inflatable antenna structure in accordance with aspects of the invention.

FIG. 1

is a schematic perspective view of an inflatable antenna structure that generally includes a pillow shaped inflatable envelope


20


formed of a thin flexible RF transparent plastic membrane, such as 0.3 mil thick Kapton (TM), and having a rear curved wall


11


and a front curved wall


13


(FIG.


2


). The shape of the inflatable envelope is maintained by inflating gas and a catenary and strut frame as described further herein. An X-band and L-band feed array


30


and a bus


40


are supported in front of the front curved wall


13


.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, an RF transparent, high emissivity black coating


16


, such as an ink coating, is disposed on the inside of the rear and front walls


11


,


13


to lower thermal gradients over the reflector enough such that wall thermal expansion variations are low enough for acceptable reflector surface accuracy and therefore acceptable RF performance. An RF reflecting coating


17


is disposed on the outside of the rear curved wall


11


, while an RF transparent solar energy reflective coating


19


can be disposed on the front curved wall


13


. The RF reflecting coating


17


can be for example a plurality of metallized layers for RF reflection.




In this exemplary embodiment, the front and rear curved walls are cylindrical and have parallel cylinder axes. The front and rear curved walls therefore intersect and are joined along substantially parallel opposing edges


15


which for reference can be considered as being horizontal and along an X-axis of an XYZ coordinate system as shown in FIG.


1


. The interface between the RF reflecting coating and the rear wall


11


thus forms a reflector having a circular cross section in the elevation plane (EL) which is parallel to the YZ plane.




The cylindrical contour in the elevation plane is maintained by gas pressure, and Y-axis reflector struts


21


, each located between opposing ends of the edges


15


, absorb cylindrical flattening forces. The Y-axis reflector struts are parallel to the Y-axis and can more particularly be inflatable, non-conductive, rigidizable tubes.




The reflector surface is flattened off-cylindrical by catenary hanger structures along the horizontal or X-axis. Each catenary hanger structure includes, for example, a catenary wire


23


and a catenary mesh web or membrane


25


that are connected between an edge


15


and ends of an X-axis strut or longeron


27


that absorbs an X-axis force created by the catenary hanger structure. Each catenary wire


23


is more particularly connected along its length to a contoured edge of the membrane


25


that maintains an accurate shape in the wire. The opposing edge of the membrane


25


is linear, and connects to the junction of the curved walls


11


,


13


. The wire


23


and the membrane


25


are preferably made of low coefficient of thermal expansion materials to maintain an accurate shape in the wire at expected temperatures.




A micrometeriod shield


28


(

FIG. 2

) is disposed in the envelope


20


and extends between the opposing edges


15


, and can also assist in maintaining linearity of the edges


15


. The shield


28


comprises a membrane such as 0.25 mil thick Mylar (TM) to absorb or slow down the fragmented pieces of a micrometeor that penetrates one of the curved walls, mitigating damage and the resulting inflatant leak rate that would otherwise occur as the fragments impact one of the curved walls on the way out of the envelope.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, the feed array


30


is supported along the horizontal and vertical axes by a feed array support structure


31


comprising a catenary frame


34


that includes X-axis or horizontal feed longerons


32


on opposite sides of the feed array


30


and plurality of vertical cross-bars


33


that span between the longerons


32


. Catenary hanger structures comprising catenary wires


37


and catenary mesh web or membrane


35


are disposed between an edge of the feed array


30


and the catenary frame


34


. The catenary wires


37


are suspended at the interconnections of the X-axis feed longerons


32


and the cross-bars


33


, and each is connected along its length to a contoured edge of an associated catenary membrane


35


that has an opposing linear edge attached to an edge of the feed array. The catenary wires


37


and the catenary membranes


35


can be made of low coefficient of thermal expansion fibers to maintain a near accurate shape at expected operating temperatures.




The feed array


30


in an exemplary embodiment is a Z-folded structure, fabricated on a flexible dielectric substrate such as a flexible circuit board structure to permit the folding. Rows and columns of radiating elements are fabricated on the substrate, and can comprise RF patch elements. Each column is aligned in the Y-axis, with the rows aligned in the X-axis.




The feed array assembly comprising the feed array


30


and the catenary supporting frame


34


is connected to the reflector supporting frame by a pair of W-trusses, each comprising outer struts


41


(

FIG. 1

) connected between the ends of the feed array longerons


32


and the ends of the reflector longerons


27


and diagonal struts


43


connected between the centers of the feed array longerons


32


and the ends of the reflector longerons


27


. Support wires


45


are connected between ends of the feed array longerons


32


and corresponding ends of the reflector longeron


27


that are further away vertically. These wires provide for stiffening against shearing.




The longerons, struts, and cross-bars of the antenna structure preferably comprise rigidizable collapsed elements that are extended and rigidized when the antenna structure is deployed in space, for example by jettison from a launch vehicle such as an Atlas II rocket, using an expanded payload fairing. For example, the reflector longerons


27


can comprise inflatable, rigidizable members. The reflector Y-axis struts


21


and the diagonal struts


43


comprise inflatable, rigidizable, Z-folded members. The feed X-axis longerons


31


and the outer struts


41


can comprise inflatable, rigidizable members. The feed cross-bars


33


can comprise inflatable, rigidizable, Z-folded members.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, the rear curved surface


11


of the inflated envelope


20


and the RF reflective coating


17


thereon form a cylindrical reflector


200


of circular cross section having for example a radius R of about 55 meters. The reflector


200


can be oversized to support elevation (EL) and azimuth (AZ) scans. For example, the reflector is about 65 meters in height H (

FIG. 4

) in the elevation plane which is parallel to the YZ plane and 60 meters in length L (

FIG. 1

) in the azimuth plane which is parallel to the XZ plane. The following are examples of parameters for one exemplary antenna system that employs such a reflector.





















Frequency




1 GHz







Bandwidth




5%







AZ Beam width




0.3 Deg







EL Beam width




0.3 Deg







Scan Volume




+/− 6 Deg AZ, +/− 6 Deg EL







Power-Aperture




30,000 KW m


2









Prime Power




32 KW







Satellite Altitude




Medium Earth Orbit







Volume




To Fit in Atlas II







Mass




<1100 Kg















For this exemplary embodiment, the active feed array


30


is about 50 meters in length FL and about 1 meter in height FH, and for reasons discussed further herein is more particularly located about half way between the vertex of the reflector


200


and the center of the circular antenna. Ideally, the feed array


30


is supported on a radial arc equal in radius to that of the reflector


200


, but for many applications, a planar feed array can be employed. To produce the specified azimuth beam width of 0.3 degree at L-band, an aperture length AL (

FIG. 1

) of about 50 meters in the azimuth plane is employed. For the elevation plane, however, a slightly greater aperture height AH (

FIG. 4

) of about 55 meters can be selected to offset the broadening effect caused by the blockage of the feed array. An aperture taper of 10 dB is imposed in both the elevation and azimuth planes to control the side lobes.




Beam scan in the elevation plane is accomplished by “rocking” (rotating) the beam with respect to the center of the circular reflector. This is done by selectively turning on/off some of the radiating elements at the top and bottom of the feed array in the Y-axis. The number of radiating elements in the Y-axis needed for operation at a given pointing direction is fewer that the number of elements forming each column. By electronically selecting the particular elements used for a particular beam in the Y-axis, e.g., by use of a commutation switch network, the beam can be rotated or scanned over a limited beamwidth. As the beam scans off axis ±6 degree in the elevation plane relative to the on-axis beam, the illumination pattern of the array feed will move up and down by about 5 meters, and a reflector height H (

FIG. 4

) of about 65 meters is selected to capture all the scanned beams.




This exemplary embodiment provides the following features. Circular symmetry provides uniform scan performance in the EL scan. Linear geometry in the AZ plane minimizes the packaging, deployment, and feed design. Cylindrical instead of spherical geometry reduces power density of the transmit modules. Symmetrical and cylindrical configuration greatly simplifies inflatable design and fabrication, and hence substantially reducing overall cost.




Ray optics shows that the focal length F of a circular reflector is about one half of its radius. Thus, a first step in the design of the exemplary embodiment is to select a proper radius for a given aperture size, which is constrained by the specified EL beam width. A long focal length F reduces aberration, (phase errors) and the focal spot size, which also results in a better-behaved (smooth) phase front in the focal region. A more uniform phase distribution is easier to match, and a small, but not too small, focal spot is desired because it requires fewer rows of radiating elements to receive the focused beam.




On the other hand, a long focal length F will offset the focal spot far away from the axis for the EL scan, which increases the feed size and the number of radiating elements required to populate the feed array. This will complicate the design of the commutation switch, which is used to shift the power to the active region of a moving focal spot. Moreover, it also increases aperture blockage, causing gain drop and side lobe degradation due to the scattering of the feed array.




The optimum focal point for this exemplary embodiment is chosen to balance the spot size, power density of the focal region, the feed height, and the maximum aperture blockage allowed. The design guideline for this embodiment is to keep the feed less than 8 m in height, and a focal spot size around ˜1.5 m using a −10 dB truncation point. It was found that an optimum focal length F for this design is about 26 meters from the vertex of the reflector


200


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 5-7

, the packaged antenna structure is deployed as follows, for example after jettisoning of a container that contained the collapsed antenna structure. The outer W-struts


41


are telescopically deployed via inflation to separate the feed array and the feed support structure from the inflatable envelope


20


, as depicted in FIG.


5


. Pursuant to such deployment, the double Z-folded envelope


20


unfolds in the Y-axis, the Z-folded enclosed struts


21


deploy freely, and the Z-folded diagonal W-struts


32


deploy freely.




The X-axis feed longerons


32


and the reflector longerons


21


are then deployed via inflation, as depicted in FIG.


6


. Pursuant to this deployment, the envelope


20


unfolds along the X-axis, and the bi-folded, Z-folded feed array


30


is deployed.




The feed crossbars are inflated to tension the feed array


30


, and the enclosed Y-axis reflector struts


21


and the diagonal struts


3


are inflated to complete deployment of the tubular longerons, struts, and cross bars. The envelope is then inflated, which will provide shear strength and maintain needed tolerances, and the tubular longerons, struts and cross bars are allowed to rigidize. The tubes are then evacuated through null jets. Solar panels


48


are also deployed to provide electrical power.




While this invention has been described in the context of an exemplary embodiment with exemplary frequency and size parameters, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular parameters set out above, and can be employed for other applications and frequency regimes. The antenna can for example be employed in multi-band, co-aperture applications, at various orbit locations, and can provide service in such applications as synthetic aperture radar, space-based radars and the like.




It is understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the possible specific embodiments which may represent principles of the present invention. Other arrangements may readily be devised in accordance with these principles by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. An antenna comprising:an inflatable flexible enclosed envelope having a cylindrically curved wall transparent to RF, said curved wall ending at first and second opposing edges; an RF reflective coating disposed on said curved wall; a reflector catenary support frame for supporting said first and second edges and for maintaining said curved wall in a predetermined shape when said envelope is inflated; and a feed array support structure including a catenary feed support frame for supporting a feed array at a reflector focal location for illuminating said RF reflective coating with RF energy.
  • 2. The antenna of claim 1 wherein said reflector support frame includes rigidizable components.
  • 3. The antenna of claim 1 wherein said feed support frame includes rigidizable components.
  • 4. The antenna of claim 1, wherein said feed array support structure further includes a truss structure connecting between said feed support structure and said reflector catenary support frame for supporting the feed support frame at said focal location.
  • 5. The antenna of claim 4 wherein said truss structure includes rigidizable components.
  • 6. The antenna of claim 1 wherein said curved wall is configured to support an aperture that is about 55 meters in height and about 50 meters in length.
  • 7. An antenna comprising:an inflatable flexible enclosed envelope having a cylindrical wall transparent to RF; said cylindrical wall ending at first and second opposing edges; an RF reflective coating disposed on said cylindrical wall; a catenary reflector support frame for supporting said first and second edges and for maintaining said cylindrical wall in a cylindrical shape when said envelope is inflated; and a catenary feed array support structure connected to said catenary support frame for supporting a feed array at a reflector focal location for illuminating said RF reflective coating with RF energy.
  • 8. The antenna of claim 7 wherein said catenary reflector support frame includes catenary supports.
  • 9. The antenna of claim 7 wherein said catenary reflector support frame includes rigidizable components.
  • 10. The antenna of claim 7 wherein said catenary feed array support structure is foldable.
  • 11. The antenna of claim 10 wherein said feed array support structure includes a catenary feed support frame and a truss structure connected between said feed support frame and said reflector catenary support frame.
  • 12. The antenna of claim 11 wherein said catenary feed support structure includes rigidizable components.
  • 13. The antenna of claim 7 wherein said cylindrical wall and said feed array are configured to have an aperture that is about 55 meters in height and about 50 meters in length.
  • 14. The antenna of claim 1 wherein said cylindrical wall has a radius of about 55 meters.
  • 15. The antenna of claim 7 wherein said feed array is located about 26 meters from a vertex of said cylindrical wall.
  • 16. A space deployable antenna comprising:an inflatable flexible enclosed envelope having a cylindrical wall transparent to RF; said cylindrical wall ending at first and second opposing edges; an RF reflective coating disposed on said cylindrical wall; a deployable catenary reflector support frame that when deployed supports said first and second edges and maintains said cylindrical wall in a cylindrical shape when said envelope is inflated; and a deployable feed array support structure connected to said catenary support frame for supporting a deployable feed array for illuminating said RF reflective coating with RF energy.
  • 17. The antenna of claim 16 wherein said catenary reflector support frame includes catenary supports.
  • 18. The antenna of claim 17 wherein said catenary reflector support frame includes extendable, rigidizable components.
  • 19. The antenna of claim 16 wherein said feed array support structure includes a catenary feed array support frame for supporting said feed array.
  • 20. The antenna of claim 19 wherein said catenary feed support frame includes extendable, rigidizable components.
  • 21. The antenna of claim 16 wherein said cylindrical wall and said feed array support structure are configured for an aperture that is about 55 meters in height and about 50 meters in length when deployed.
  • 22. The antenna of claim 16 wherein said cylindrical wall has a radius of about 55 meters when deployed, an d said feed array is located about 26 meters from a vertex of said cylindrical wall when deployed.
  • 23. The antenna of claim 16, further comprising a micrometeor shield disposed within said envelope.
  • 24. The antenna of claim 16, wherein said feed array support structure further includes a deployable truss structure connected between said feed support structure and said reflector catenary support frame for supporting the feed support frame at said focal location.
US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
3005987 Mack et al. Oct 1961 A
3056131 McCreary Sep 1962 A
4608571 Luly Aug 1986 A
4672389 Ulry Jun 1987 A
5132699 Rupp et al. Jul 1992 A
5166696 Rupp et al. Nov 1992 A
5579609 Sallee Dec 1996 A
5990851 Henderson et al. Nov 1999 A
6340956 Bowen et al. Jan 2002 B1
6344835 Allen et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353421 Lalezari et al. Mar 2002 B1
6417818 Shipley et al. Jul 2002 B2
6512496 Alexeff et al. Jan 2003 B2
6570545 Snow et al. May 2003 B1