The present invention relates to information processing apparatuses.
JP-A-05-100809 discloses art related to the technical field of the present invention. The publication describes “An information processing apparatus including a touch panel device at least comprising: a physical type of an object; display position information on a display; file information where a status of the object is set; a display information table 1 storing display data of the object that includes a name of a file in a normal state and a name of the file in a special state (reversed display); and touch panel information 2 including a touch position coordinate and touch pressure information. A physical operation decided by a corresponding relation between physical information indicated by the display information table 1 and physical information indicated by the touch panel information 2 is given to the object to display it.”
Recently, information processing apparatuses for portable usage have become multi-functioned and ease of use thereof is particularly required.
An object of the present invention is to provide an information processing apparatus that offers improved convenience to users.
To solve the foregoing problem, an aspect of the present invention provides an information processing apparatus comprising: a touch panel which displays a plurality of pieces of identification information including letters, figures, and symbols, and for detecting a contact of the panel with a finger of a user or other objects; a detection unit, when the touch panel detects a contact of the panel with the object, which species identification information indicated by a position of the contact at which the contact in question occurred, of the multiple pieces of identification information displayed on the touch panel, and which detects an area of part where the contact occurred; a storage unit which stores reference identification information and a reference area range; a determination unit which determines whether the identification information detected by the detection unit matches the reference identification information stored in the storage unit and whether the area of the contact detected by the detection unit falls within the reference area range stored in the storage unit; and a control unit which performs particular processing when the determination unit determines that the identification information detected by the detection unit matches the reference identification information stored in the storage unit and the area of the contact detected by the detecting unit falls within the reference area range stored in the storing unit.
By employing such system, an information processing apparatus including a touch panel can be improved in usability.
The present invention will be described hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[First Embodiment]
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The way of calibration and the usage method for cancelling the lock or unlocking the portable terminal 0 according to the first embodiment will be described below with reference to
Among types of operation performed by the user on the portable terminal 0 are tapping, dragging, flicking, and pinching. Tapping is an operation which the user touches one point of the screen with a finger for a moment on the touch panel 1. Dragging is an operation which the user moves his or her finger over the screen of the touch panel 1 while the finger is in contact therewith. Flicking is an operation which the user quickly slides his or her finger on the screen of the touch panel 1 while touching it. Pinching is an operation which the user touches two points of the screen of the touch panel 1 with two fingers and changes the distance between the two points.
A series of operations from start-up of the portable terminal 0, calibration, and to turn-off of the portable terminal 0 will be next described. The term calibration used herein refers to an operation of setting a threshold value that is used for determining a contact range.
The power of the portable terminal turns on by pressing the button switch for a certain time. Then, the control unit 3 starts a program, adjusts the sensors, initializes the threshold value, and performs initial settings for screen display and other factors (S1000). After the initial setting procedure, the control unit 3 performs control to display lock cancel screen on the touch panel 1 (S1001). As can be seen in
The threshold value used for determining the contact range is defined as above by using the average value of the number of columns of sensors 4 that responded to the contact with the finger during unlocking (S1003). In other words, the threshold value for determining the contact range can be obtained (i.e., calibration can be made), simultaneously with unlocking operation.
The control unit 3 unlocks the portable terminal 0 (S1004) and waits until the user makes various inputs by way of the touch panel 1 (S1005). Receiving an input with a contact range equal to or narrower than the threshold value (specifically, “3” or less) (S1006), the control unit 3 determines that a finger tip input is made (S1007). Receiving an input with a contact range wider than the threshold value (specifically, “4” or more) (S1006), the control unit 3 determines that a finger pad input is made (S1008). After that, various operations are performed following the order of the input.
When no input is made for a predetermined period, several minutes for example, the control unit 3 stores the time and date of calibration, the threshold value, and other setting values, and then locks the portable terminal 0 (S1009). The control unit 3 displays the lock cancel screen (S1001) when a lock cancel switch assigned to the button switch 5 is pushed (S1010). When the button switch 5 is pressed for a certain time while the power of the portable terminal 0 is on, the power turns off.
As described heretofore, regardless of difference with individuals in contact ranges of finger tip input, the calibration allows accuracy of contact range determination to be improved. The first embodiment of the present invention uses the average of the number of columns of the sensors 4 that responded to the contact with the finger as the threshold value. However, this is not the only possible way for setting the threshold. For example, the threshold value may be corrected by adding an appropriate value to, or subtracting any value from, the average of the number of columns of the sensors 4 that responded to a contact with a finger. The threshold value does not need to be an integer and instead a capacitance value may be used. Further, the threshold value used for determining the contact range may be discarded upon locking, and calibration can be performed to update threshold value every time the terminal is unlocked. Instead of performing calibration upon unlocking, calibration may be performed only at the first time the portable terminal 0 is turned on. It may also be performed by selecting a function for calibration from a setting menu or the like. Furthermore, the first embodiment of the present invention performed calibration on the basis of the contact range of either the finger tip input or the finger pad input. Alternatively, the contact ranges of both the finger tip input and the finger pad input may be obtained to set a plurality of threshold values.
A method for distinguishing the finger tip input and the finger pad input will be described in more details below.
A way of moving an icon utilizing the difference between contact ranges of the finger tip input and the finger pad input will be described in detail below.
As described above, the first embodiment allows the user to make more intuitive input. The contact range described herein may be the number of sensors responded or the maximum number of the columns of sensors responded. When an application for finger pad input with a wide contact area is not set or applied to the terminal, the process of determining contact area can be omitted and contact operation may be performed uniformly.
[Second Embodiment]
A second embodiment of the present invention relates to a portable terminal 0 using a password. The second embodiment is characterized in that it stores not only a numeric password but also a difference in the contact range with the aim of enhancing security. A description is made for an example of the enhanced security function that incorporates a four-digit password and a difference in the contact range with reference to;
The process for password registration will be first described with reference to the flow chart of
The user selects and touches any numbers among numbers 0 to 9 displayed on a touch panel 1 by either the finger tip input or the finger pad input. The selected numbers are registered as input numerals (S2006). Then, the control unit 3 compares the contact range with the threshold value. When the contact range is equal to or smaller than the threshold value (S2007: Yes), the control unit 3 stores the input numeral in association with the finger tip input (S2008). A message as shown in
The control unit 3 displays a message as shown in
A method for cancelling or unlocking the password will be next described below with reference to
As can be seen in
It is to be noted that a plurality of input methods may be registered for one password. For example, in the case shown in
Using the above system, a user can complicate cancellation of a lock by making a simple input to enhance security. The portable terminal 0 can thus handle user's highly confidential information, which makes the terminal more useful.
Security can be enhanced by only storing, in addition to the password registered, the input method for each of the password numbers. An increase in storage capacity can be sufficiently suppressed.
From the view of a user, the user only needs to remember the input method for each password number to unlock the portable terminal 0. Burdens on the user for memorization can thus be alleviated. It is also advantageous in that when a user has to tell others the way to unlock the portable terminal 0, the user only needs to tell the password numbers and the input method for each of the password numbers.
Although the second embodiment employed a password composed of numerals only, the present invention is not limited to this. The password may be composed of alphabets, symbols, figures, patterns, colors, or other elements, or combinations thereof. In addition, the number of digits of a password is not limited to four and the number may instead be one, two, or a greater numeral.
The process for password registration (
In the embodiment of the present invention, calibration is performed by a user touching a single point. However, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the calibration performed during unlocking as described for the first embodiment may be applied. The user may also start calibration by calling up a particular function from the setting menu. Incidentally, during the password cancellation, the message informing the fact that the difference in contact ranges are detected may be not shown (hidden), and when only the numbers are correct, a message may be displayed to inform that the difference in the contact range is also registered. Numerals and input methods may also be hidden and not shown during password input. While a threshold value is used for distinguishing the finger tip input and the finger pad input in the embodiment, the present invention is not limited to this. The determination of an input method may be conducted in a manner such that records both contact ranges of the finger tip input and the finger pad input, and when a input is made, compares the input contact range with the data, whereby selecting the closer one as the method of the particular input.
The operation of distinguishing the difference in the contact range may be omitted in particular situations of input. For example, the system may be adapted so that the classification based on a difference in contact ranges is not performed when the button switch is pressed or when more than two points are touched for multi-touch input.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011-025576 | Feb 2011 | JP | national |
Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,654,093. The reissue applications are application Ser. Nos. 17/497,855 (the present application) and 16/260,879, all of which are continuation reissues of U.S. Pat. No. 8,654,093. The present application is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,654,093 issued on Feb. 18, 2014 from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/366,983 filed Feb. 6, 2012, and is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/260,879 filed Jan. 29, 2019, which is also a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,654,093 issued on Feb. 18, 2014 from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/366,983 filed Feb. 6, 2012, which in turn claims priority from Japanese patent application serial no.No. JP2011-025576, filed on Feb. 9, 2011, the contententire contents of each of which isare hereby incorporated by reference into this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5844547 | Minakuchi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6181328 | Shieh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6360004 | Akizuki | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6509847 | Anderson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546122 | Russo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6795569 | Setlak | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6937226 | Sakurai et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950539 | Bjorn et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954862 | Serpa | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6970584 | O'Gorman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7190348 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7289824 | Jerbi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7345675 | Minakuchi et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7444163 | Ban et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7593000 | Chin | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7605804 | Wilson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7697729 | Howell et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725511 | Kadi | May 2010 | B2 |
7738916 | Fukuda | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7777732 | Herz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7877707 | Westerman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7982721 | Hio | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8023700 | Riionheimo | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8051468 | Davis et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8059872 | Tazoe | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8127254 | Lindberg et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8224392 | Kim et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8402533 | LeBeau et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8443199 | Kim et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8498406 | Ghassabian | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8528073 | Tawara | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8605959 | Kangas et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8633909 | Miyazawa et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649575 | Nagar et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8654093 | Yamada | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8683582 | Rogers | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8745490 | Kim | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8782775 | Fadell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8836645 | Hoover | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8860689 | Zimchoni | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8878791 | Grover et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904479 | Johansson et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9027117 | Wilairat | May 2015 | B2 |
9032337 | Oh et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9223948 | Griffin et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9244562 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9304602 | Ghassabian | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9626099 | Michaelis et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20020163506 | Matusis | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181747 | Topping | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030139192 | Chmaytelli et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152253 | Wong | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040085300 | Matusis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040252867 | Lan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050162407 | Sakurai et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169503 | Howell et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050253814 | Ghassabian | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060026535 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060066589 | Ozawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075256 | Hagiwara et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060284853 | Shapiro | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014442 | Yu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070097096 | Rosenberg | May 2007 | A1 |
20070152976 | Townsend et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070250786 | Jeon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080049987 | Champagne et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069412 | Champagne et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080158170 | Herz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080267465 | Matsuo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090046065 | Liu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090083847 | Fadell et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090095540 | Zachut et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090160800 | Liu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165145 | Haapsaari et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169070 | Fadell | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090313693 | Rogers | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020020 | Chen | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020035 | Ryu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026642 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100044121 | Simon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045608 | Lessing | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060571 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066701 | Ningrat | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070931 | Nichols | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079380 | Nurmi | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097176 | Sakurai et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110228 | Ozawa et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138914 | Davis et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180336 | Jones et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100225443 | Bayram et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231356 | Kim | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265185 | Oksanen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279738 | Kim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303311 | Shin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325721 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110012856 | Maxwell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110074677 | Ording et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110162420 | Lee | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175804 | Grover | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110300829 | Nurmi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310024 | Sakatsume | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310049 | Homma et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110321157 | Davis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120023573 | Shu | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120032979 | Blow et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044156 | Michaelis et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056846 | Zaliva | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075098 | Kuncl | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084734 | Wilairat | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120098639 | Ijas et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120192100 | Wang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120196573 | Sugiyama et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120200515 | Yamada | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120229406 | Wu | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120274662 | Kim et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284297 | Aguera-Arcas et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120285297 | Rozmus et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299856 | Hasui | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299860 | Wang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120319977 | Kuge | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20160034177 | Westerman et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1226691 | Nov 2005 | CN |
1755604 | Apr 2006 | CN |
1912819 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101930341 | Dec 2010 | CN |
2393066 | Mar 2004 | GB |
5-100809 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5-100809 | Apr 1993 | JP |
H05100809 | Apr 1993 | JP |
H11-272423 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2001-242952 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2003-529130 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2005-202527 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-202527 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2006-127486 | May 2006 | JP |
2006-172180 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2008-243149 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2011-014044 | Jan 2011 | JP |
100847140 | Jul 2008 | KR |
100884045 | Feb 2009 | KR |
10-2010-0003572 | Jan 2010 | KR |
20100003572 | Jan 2010 | KR |
201101130 | Jan 2011 | TW |
2001069520 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2005008568 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2010070756 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010073243 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010104015 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011094936 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Manabe et al, “Proposal of New imput Systems,” NTT Technology Reports, Technical Journal, vol. 9, No. 4, Mar. 2008, pp. 37-42. |
Monrose Fabian et al., “Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication,” Elsevier Science, Future Generation Computer Systems vol. 16, 2000, pp. 351-359. |
Tan, Desney S. et al, “Spy-Resistant Keyboard: More Secure Password Entry on Public Touch Screen Displays,” Microsoft Research, Jan. 2005, 10 pages. |
APC Biopod Quick Installation Guide, Part No. 990-1705, APC, www.apc.com, 2 pages, 2003. |
Diefenderfer, Graig T., “Fingerprint Recognition,” Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Jun. 2006, 153 pages. |
Blasko, Gabor et al., “A Wristwatch-Computer Based Password-Vault,” IBM Research Report, Computer Science, Mar. 2005, 19 pages. |
Chan, K.C., et al., “Fast Fingerprint Verification Using Subregions of Fingerprint Images,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 95-101. |
Yau, Wei-Yun et al., “Nonlinear phase portrait modeing of fingerpriint orientation,” 8th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision China, Dec. 2004, pp. 1262-1267. |
Akreekul, Vutipong, et al., “The New Focal Point Localization Algorithm for Fingerpring Recognition,” IEEE Computer Society, The 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06), 2006, 4 pages. |
Wang, Feng, et al., “Empirical Evaluation for Finger Input Properties in Mutli-touch Iinteraction,” CHI, Tabletop Gestures, Apr. 2009, pp. 1062-1072. |
Merriam-webster dictionary definition of coincident from Feb. 20, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/260,879, dated Jan. 22, 2020. |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/260,879, dated Aug. 5, 2020. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/260,879, dated Nov. 23, 2020. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/260,879, dated Jul. 8, 2021. |
Numabe et al., “Finger Identification for Touch Panel Operation Using Tapping Fluctuation,” The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics, pp. 899-902 (2009). |
Eleccion, “Automatic Fingerprint Identification,” IEEE Spectrum (1973). |
Holz et al., “The Generalized Perceived Input Point Model and How to Double Touch Accuracy By Extracting Fingerprints,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010). |
Wang et al., “Detecting and Leveraging Finger Orientation for Interaction With Direct-Touch Surfaces,” Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2009). |
Saevanee et al., “User Authentication Using Combination of Behavioral Biometrics Over the Touchpad Acting Like Touch Screen of Mobile Device,” International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering (2008). |
Harrison et al., “TapSense: Enhancing Finger Interaction on Touch Surfaces,” Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2011). |
Entire Prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,983, filed Feb. 6, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,654,093, issued Feb. 18, 2014 to Yamada entitled “Information Processing Apparatus”. |
Entire Prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,993, filed Jan. 14, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,982,086, issued Mar. 17, 2015 to Yamada entitled “Information Processing Apparatus”. |
Chinese Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 2014062700460410, dated Jul. 2, 2014. |
Sugiura & Koseki, A User Interface Usign Fingerprint Recognition—Holding Commands and Data Objects on Fingers, C&C Media Research Labs., NEC Corp. (1998). |
Kaoru Uchida, Fingerprint-based User-friendly Interface and Pocket-PID for Mobile Authentication, IEEE 205 (2000). |
Jansen et. al., Picture Password: A Visual Login Technique for Mobile Devices, National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency Report (2003). |
Jansen et al., Fingerprint Identification and Mobile Handheld Devices: An Overview and Implementation, National institute of Standards and Technology Interagency Report 7290, (Mar. 2006). |
Benko et. al., Precise Selection Techniques for Multi-Touch Screens, CHI 2006, Apr. 22-28, 2006. |
Ricci et. al., SecurePhone: A Mobile Phone with Biometric Authentication and E-Sigriature Support for Dealing Securet Transactions on the Fly, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 6250, Defense and Security Symposium (2006). |
Forlines et. al., Direct-Touch vs. Mouse Input for Tabletop Displays, Proceedings of CHI 2007, Apr. 28-May 3, 2007. |
Cheng et. al., SmartSiren: Virus Detection and Alert for Smartphones, MobiSys '07 (Jun. 11-14, 2007). |
Fujitsu F906i comes with AuthenTec/TruNav: iPhone Competitor, Smart in Technology, (Aug. 2008). |
Jansen & Scarfone, Guidelines on Cell Phone and PDA Security, National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-124 (Oct. 2008). |
Roudaut et. al., MicroRolls: Expanding Touch-Screen Input Vocabulary by Distinguishing Rolls v. Slides of the Thumb, CHI 2009 (Apr. 4-9, 2009). |
Yatani & Truong, SemFeel: A User Interface with Semantic Feedback for Mobile Touchscreen Devices, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, UIST '09, (Oct. 4, 2009). |
Maltoni, Davide, et al., Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition (2nd ed.) Springer-Verlag London, Ltd. (2009), pp. 67, 74, 191, 244-45. |
Benko et. al., Enhancing Input On and Above the Interactive Surface with Muscle Sensing,ITS '09 (Nov. 23-25, 2009). |
Ahsamullah et. al., Investigation of Fingertip Blobs on Optical Multi-Touch Screen, Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Petronas (2010). |
Park & Han, One-Handed Thumb Interaction of Mobile Devices From the Input Accuracy Perspective, 40 Inti. J. Industrial Ergonomics 746 (2010). |
Respondents' Initial Invalidity Contentions (Initial Version), dated Dec. 7, 2022. |
Respondents' Supplemental Invalidity Contentions, dated Jan. 17, 2023. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16260879 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 13366983 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13366983 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 17497855 | US | |
Parent | 13366983 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 16260879 | US |