Informing a lawful interception system of the serving system an intercepted target

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method for informing a lawful interception system of the serving system serving an intercepted target, as well as to a correspondingly adapted serving system node of a serving system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The provision of a lawful interception is a requirement of national law, which is usually mandatory. From time to time, a network operator and/or a service provider will be required, according to a lawful authorization, to make results of interception relating to specific identities (i.e. users and their terminals) available to a specific intercepting authority or Law Enforcement Agency (LEA).

There are various aspects of interception. The respective national law describes under what conditions and with what restrictions interception is allowed. If a LEA wishes to use lawful interception as a tool, it will ask a prosecuting judge or other responsible body-for a lawful authorization, such as a warrant. If the lawful authorization is granted, the LEA will present the lawful authorization to an access provider which provides access from a user's terminal to that network, to the network operator, or to the service provider via an administrative interface or procedure. When a lawful interception is authorized, Intercept Related Information (IRI) and/or the content of the corresponding communication (CC) are delivered to the LEA.

The lawful authorization may describe the IRI and the content of the communication (CC) that are allowed to be delivered for this LEA. Typically, the interception period and interception target (e.g., a person's name or MSISDN number(s) related to SIM card(s) or IMEI code of a mobile terminal. For different LEAs and for different investigations, different constraints can apply that further limit the general borders set by the law. The interception target (i.e. the user's SIM card and/or terminal to be intercepted) may also be described in different ways in a lawful authorization, e.g. subscriber address, physical address, location, services etc.

Such a lawful interception functionality is also needed in the packet switched part of new mobile data networks such as the GSM and the UMTS (also known as 2G GPRS and/or 3G GPRS).

Lawful interception is based on an EU Council resolution, which concerns all telecommunications systems, not only mobile ones. Lawful interception has been further subdivided to the lawful interception proper, and to the handover part of the intercepted data to the authorized law enforcement agency's monitoring facility (LEMF). The 3GPP and the European. Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) have defined further technical requirements. These requirements define three interfaces for each part of packet data interception and handover:

X1 (=HI1): administrative tasks (HI1 may be on paper or fax or online or otherwise)

X2 (=HI2): IRI delivery (near real time)

X3 (=HI3): intercepted user data (near real time)

The interface X1 carries interception requests. HI1 carries authorization documents, encryption keys and the like. The interface X2 and HI2 carry IRI (Interception Related Information) like phone numbers, service information, time stamps etc. The interface X3 carries the content of communication (CC), i.e., the intercepted packets containing data sent and/or received etc. The exact definitions of the three interfaces are left to local legislation and authorities. The interfaces X1 to X3 are referred in the 3GPP TS 33.107. The three HI interfaces are defined in 3GPP TS 33.108 and in ETSI ES 201 671 V2.1.1 as HI1/HI2/HI3 interfaces.

With respect to FIG. 1, the lawful interception is described in more detail. FIG. 1 shows a reference configuration for the lawful interception for GPRS (General Packet Radio Systems). Reference numeral 1 denotes a Law Enforcement Monitoring Facility (LEMF) mentioned above. The symbols X1, X2, X3, HI1 HI2 and HI3 denote the above-mentioned interfaces between the LEMF and respective network elements which are described in the following. Numeral 2_1 denotes an Administrative Function ADMF for LI (Lawful Interception) in the network. Numeral 2_2 indicates an IRI delivery function (also known as DF2/MF2 e.g. for packet data like GPRS), whereas numeral 2_3 indicates a CC delivery function (also known as DF3/MF3 e.g. for packet data). The ADMF 2_1, the IRI delivery function 2_2 and the CC delivery function 2_3 are connected to a GSN (GPRS Support Node) 3 via interfaces X1_1, X2 and X3, respectively. In addition, the IRI and CC delivery functions are connected with the ADMF 2_1 via interfaces X1_2 and X1_3, respectively. The GSN 3 can be an SGSN or a GGSN or other node intercepting user activity or frames containing user level packet data.

In this manner, the ADMF 2_1 is used together with the delivery functions to hide from the GSN that there might be multiple activations by different Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) on the same target. Additionally, the packet network complexity is hidden from the LEA(s).

In case of a packet switched services, the IRI and CC data are transmitted in packets to the LEMF 1. The packet flow starts from the packet intercepting node (i.e. GSN 3 in FIG. 1) to the delivery function nodes (i.e., IRI and CC delivery functions 2_2 and 2_3 in FIG. 1) to the LEMF 1. The LEMF system has a mass memory for packets, but it may also monitor packets as near real time streams. In GPRS, for example, the IRI data is defined to have some network attachment and/or PDP (Packet Data Protocol) context related data incorporated that relates the IRI to certain subscriber activity. The packets thus relate to a certain PDP context as an example of a network attachment and/or an active communication context (while only the context need to be active, not necessarily the communication need to be active in the sense of “ongoing”).

Thus, lawful interception is a topic, which mainly concerns core networks of communication networks, in particular, of (2G and/or 3G) packet switched communication networks.

According to recent tendencies in communication network evolution, communication networks are adopted to interact with each other in a compatible manner. This means that communication networks operated by different operators interact with each other as well as communication networks in different countries (having a respective different jurisdiction) interact with other. For the purpose of the present invention, a communication network operated by a specific operator is also referred to as a serving system serving an intercepted target MS roaming within the communication network system. The communication network system comprises at least one serving system, and each serving system in turn comprises at least one serving system node serving the intercepted target for communication. In case of GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) as an example of packet switched communication network and/or serving system, serving system nodes can be exemplified as SGSN (Serving GPRS Support Node) or GGSN (Gateway GPRS Support Node). Interception of a target can take place already at an SGSN or at the GGSN. Also, according to agreed serving system architecture, the SGSNs of a serving system are connected to the GGSN thereof.

Thus, a user traveling with his terminal such as a mobile station MS and/or a user equipment UE within such a communication network system, and being a target for lawful interception, is roaming within different networks and may even move out of the given warrant's (court order) jurisdiction.

Such circumstances have led to a requirement in lawful interception standardization that a home lawful interception LI system should know where the target (intercepted mobile) is roaming. Currently, if Operator A's subscriber (as a target for lawful interception) is moving from operator A's serving system node such as an SGSN (“old SGSN”) to operator B's serving system node such as an SGSN (“new SGSN”), operator A's GPRS network does not have sufficient information about the network/serving system the target terminal is moving to. Currently, only the SGSN's Internet Protocol (IP) address is transferred from the new SGSN to the old SGSN in an SGSN Context Request, but the IP address does not identify the country and the operator network and/or serving system where the new SGSN is located. This information on where the target has moved to resides in the HLR but currently LI system is always connected to the SGSN and/or to the GGSN, never to HLR.

In order to solve these difficulties, solutions for future networks (Re15 UMTS) have been agreed upon in communication networks standardization by 3GPP (3^rdGeneration partnership Project). These solutions are for example described in 3GPP TS 33.108 V5.0.0 (2002-06) and 3GPP TS 33.107 V5.3.0 (2002-06).

With these solutions, a requirement for the HLR (Home Location Register, as used in 2G) and/or HSS (Home Subscriber Server, as used in 3G) was introduced in that the HLR has to report to the DF/MF (Delivery Function/Mediation Function) the whereabouts of the new serving system serving node (SGSN) once an interception target is trying to attach thereto, or when the target is trying to change the serving operator's serving node to the new operator's serving node (for example in a inter SGSN inter PLNM RAU—Routing Area Update). This is relevant once the target moves to an area and/or a serving system, which is out of the given LEA's or warrant's jurisdiction. However, this reporting by the HLR requires from the HLR certain actions even if the target stays under the LEA's or warrant's jurisdiction. Therefore, this current solution imposes a rather heavy overload on a HLR in terms of processing required as well as communication traffic over interfaces within the core network. While, without such additional efforts, the lawful interception system does not know where the target is if the subscriber moves/changes to another PLMN (Public Land Mobile Network).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Consequently, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method for informing a lawful interception system of the serving system serving an intercepted target, as well as to a correspondingly adapted serving system node of a serving system.

According to the present invention, the above object is for example achieved by a method for informing a lawful interception system of the serving system serving an intercepted target roaming within a communication network system, the communication network system comprising at least one serving system each serving system comprising at least one serving system node serving the intercepted target for communication, the method comprising the steps of: first detecting a serving system node change request from the intercepted target towards a new serving system node which is currently not serving the target, first processing said serving system node change request at said new serving system node currently not serving the target, wherein said processing comprises the inclusion, to the request, of a serving system address of the new serving system node currently not serving the target, and first forwarding said processed request to an old serving system node currently serving the target.

According to favorable further developments

- said old serving system node currently serving the target informs the interception system of the serving system address of the new serving system node,
- the method comprises the further steps of second detecting at least one active communication context for said target, and in response thereto, generating a communication context update request to which is included the serving system address of the new serving system node currently not serving the target, and second forwarding said generated request to a gateway serving system node of the serving system currently serving the intercepted target,
- said gateway serving system node informs the interception system of the serving system address of the new serving system node,
- said serving system address of the new serving system node represents information about the serving system to which said new serving node belongs,
- said information about the serving system to which said new serving node belongs comprises at least one of the following information items: serving node MSISDN number, serving node routing area identifier, serving node address,
- said serving node routing area identifier contains information items representative of a mobile country code MCC, mobile network code MNC, location area code LAC, and routing area code RAC.

Also, according to the present invention, the above object is for example achieved by a serving system node of a serving system, the serving system node being adapted to serve an intercepted target for communication, and being connectable to a lawful interception system, the serving system node comprising: first detection means adapted for first detecting a serving system node change request from the intercepted target, first processing means adapted for first processing said serving system node change request, wherein said processing is adapted to include, to the request, a serving system address of the serving system node, and first forwarding means adapted for first forwarding said processed request to another serving system node currently serving the target.

According to favorable further developments

- the serving system node comprises informing means adapted to inform the interception system of the serving system address of a new serving system node, said informing means being active in case said serving system node is currently serving the target,
- the serving system node comprises second detection means adapted for second detecting at least one active communication context for said target, and generation means, controlled by said second detection means, and adapted for generating a communication context update request to which is included the serving system address of the serving system node, and second forwarding means adapted for second forwarding said generated request to a gateway serving system node of the serving system currently serving the intercepted target,
- said serving system address of the serving system node represents information about the serving system to which said new serving node belongs,
- said information about the serving system to which said serving node belongs comprises at least one of the following information items: serving node MSISDN number, serving node routing area identifier, serving node address,
- said serving node routing area identifier contains information items representative of a mobile country code MCC, mobile network code MNC, location area code LAC, and routing area code RAC.

By virtue of the present invention, which, briefly stated, proposes that the old serving system node (SGSN and/or GGSN) report the address of the new serving system (and/or whereabouts of the new serving system) to the lawful interception system, basically the following advantages can be achieved:

- the previously known solution is improved,
- it is easy to be implemented to 2G as well as 3G serving system nodes such as SGSN and/or GGSN,
- the lawful interception system (already at the lawful interception gateway which may be a SGSN/GGSN),has the knowledge where the subscriber is (location and/or at least serving system (i.e. knowledge which operator runs the serving system serving the target); thus, the old serving system node (e.g. “old SGSN”) and consequently delivery/mediation function get immediately the knowledge where the subscriber is moving to, as this information can be critical in case the new serving system node (“new SGSN”) is out of the LEA's jurisdiction,
- the HLR or other comparable databases/registers or servers such as HSS need no longer be involved in fetching the necessary information indicating where the intercepted subscriber (target) is or is moving to,
- this, in turn, leads to the present invention defining a more efficient solution as no additional signaling with/processing by the HLR/HSS is required due to the fact that once a first (serving system node change request) or second detection (of an active communication context) is successful, the old serving system node (SGSN/GGSN) informs the LEA of the new serving system node's address information.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the following, the present invention will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which

FIG. 1 shows a reference configuration for the lawful interception for GPRS (General Packet Radio Systems) as an example of a packet switched communication network and/or serving system; and

FIG. 2 shows a signaling scenario for an Inter SGSN Routing Area Update as known from 3GPP TS 23.060 used for explaining the present invention.

FIG. 3 shows a signaling scenario for an Attach Procedure as known from 3GPP TS 23.060 used for explaining the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

For better understanding of the preset invention, it should be noted that the GSN as an example of a serving system node may be a SGSN or a GGSN in case of GPRS. Thus, the lawful interception system is connected to SGSN or GGSN as a serving system node, dependent on where the interception is performed. SGSN and GGSN are connected to each other and mutually exchange information, as required, via a connection element generally known as Gn interface. The lawful interception system “beyond” the serving system node SGSN/GGSN shown in FIG. 1 is omitted from the illustration in FIG. 2 in order to keep the drawing simple.

FIG. 2 is described in detail in 3GPP TS 23.060, so that a detailed description thereof is omitted. It is to be noted that the boxes labeled C1 to C4 define CAMEL action points which are not related to the present invention. The present invention, when referring to the signaling shown in FIG. 2, affects steps 2. and/or 6., i.e. the SGSN Context Request and the Update PDP Context Request as respective examples in connection with GPRS as a serving system. When referring to the signaling shown in FIG. 3, the present invention affects step 2., i.e. the Identification Request, as explained later on.

Subsequently, the present invention will be set out in greater detail.

As is commonly agreed, the blocks in FIGS. 2 and 3 arranged in horizontal direction indicate network entities and/or terminals involved in the signaling, whereas the arrows there between in horizontal direction represent the signaling. The time relation within the signaling is reflected by the numbering of the arrows as well as by the vertical arrangement of these.

MS denotes a mobile station and/or user equipment (UE) as a target to bee intercepted. The target accesses a serving system such as the GPRS network via a base station subsystem BSS representing an access network. The serving system comprises at least one serving system node such as a SGSN and/or GGSN. As shown in FIG. 2, there is an “new” and an “old” SGSN. “New” means that the target has moved/roamed to an area in which the new serving system node is determined to be in charge of serving the target. “Old” means that the old SGSN has formerly been or is currently still in charge of serving the target (until the new one has fully taken over serving of the target). The “new” and the “old” serving system node can be nodes of different serving systems which may be in different countries and/or operated by different operators.

The present invention conceives a method for informing a lawful interception system (not shown in FIG. 2) of the serving system serving an intercepted target MS roaming within a communication network system. The information related to the serving system is referred to as serving system address. The communication network system comprises at least one serving system, each serving system comprising at least one serving system node serving the intercepted target for communication.

With reference to FIG. 2, assuming that the old and new SGSN are operated by the same operator, there is shown one serving system having two serving system nodes illustrated. Whereas in case that it is assumed that the old and the new SGSN represent serving system nodes operated by different operators and/or in different countries, there is shown a situation with two serving systems each having one serving system node illustrated; the old SGSN could reside in the home network of the target subscriber, whereas the new SGSN would reside in a visited network to which the target has roamed.

When roaming to an area in which a new serving system node is determined to be in charge for serving the target, the target issues a serving system node change request (step 1.). In case of GPRS being the basis of a serving system, such a serving system node change request is referred to as Routing Area Update RAU request. This request is communicated to the new serving system node. The serving system node then performs a first detecting of this serving system node change request received from the intercepted target MS and communicated to the new serving system node which is currently not serving the target. The thus detected serving system node change request is subjected, at the new serving system node currently not serving the target, to a first processing (not shown in FIG. 2). The processing comprises the inclusion, to the (detected and received) request, of a serving system address of the new serving system node currently not serving the target. Then, there is performed a first forwarding of said processed request (step 2.) to the old serving system node currently (still) serving the target. This old serving system node currently serving the target subsequently informs the interception system (not shown) of the serving system address of the new serving system node. Stated in other words, in case of the lawful interception system being connected to the SGSN, the (old) SGSN informs the LEA directly. In case the lawful interception system is connected to the GGSN, the SGSN transfers the information to the GGSN which in turn transmits it to the LEA.

Furthermore, the new serving system node, to which the target roams, performs a second detecting of whether there is at least one active communication context for said target (such as for example a PDP context active). If so, the node generates a communication context update request (e.g. an Update PDP Context Request) to which request is included the serving system address of the new serving system node currently not serving the target. Subsequently, a second forwarding of said generated request (step 6.) to a gateway serving system node (e.g. GGSN) of the serving system currently serving the intercepted target is performed.

Then, said gateway serving system node (e.g. GGSN) informs the interception system (and/or in the end the LEA) of the serving system address of the new serving system node. That is, in case of the lawful interception system being connected to the GGSN, the GGSN informs the LEA directly. In case the lawful interception system is connected to the SGSN, the GGSN transfers the information to the old SGSN which in turn transmits it to the LEA.

The serving system address of the new serving system node represents information indicative of the serving system to which said new serving node belongs. Any such information can be used for this purpose as long as it is sufficient to distinguish the serving system nodes as well as the location/serving system to which they belong from each other. Hence, the information about the serving system to which said new serving node belongs comprises, for example in case of GPRS serving systems, at least one of the following information items: serving node MSISDN number, serving node Routing Area Identifier RAI, serving node address. In other serving systems, the information element (IE) may be referred to by other names.

The above mentioned serving node routing area identifier in turn contains information items representative of a mobile country code MCC, mobile network code MNC, location area code LAC, and routing area code RAC, thereby uniquely defining the node as such as well as its location within the network system and in particular the network/serving system to which it belongs.

Herein before, the present invention has been described with a focus on the method according to the present invention. Nevertheless, the present invention concerns also a correspondingly adapted serving system node of a serving system, the serving system node being adapted to serve an intercepted target MS for communication, and being connectable to a lawful interception system. As will be readily understood by those skilled in the art from the foregoing description of the method, such a serving system node comprises first detection means adapted for performing a first detecting of a serving system node change request from the intercepted target MS, a first processing means adapted for performing a first processing of said serving system node change request, wherein said processing is adapted to include, to the request, a serving system address of the serving system node, and also comprises a first forwarding means adapted for performing a first forwarding of said processed request to another serving system node currently serving the target.

Also, a corresponding serving system node comprises an informing means adapted to inform the lawful interception system of the serving system address of a new serving system node, said informing means being active in case said serving system node is currently serving the target. The node may inform the lawful interception system and/or the LEA directly in case the interception system is connected to the node (e.g. node is SGSN or GGSN and lawful interception is connected to SGSN or GGSN, respectively). Alternatively, also indirect informing can take place (e.g. in case the node is SGSN and lawful interception system is connected to GGSN).

Furthermore, the proposed serving system node according to the present invention comprised a second detection means adapted for performing a second detecting of at least one active communication context for said target, and has a generation means, controlled by said second detection means, and adapted for generating a communication context update request to which is included the serving system address of the serving system node. Also, a second forwarding means is provided which is adapted for second forwarding said generated request to a gateway serving system node (GGSN) of the serving system currently serving the intercepted target. So, referring to the example shown in FIG. 2, the new SGSN forwards the Update PDP Context Request either to the GGSN of its own serving system in case the new SGSN belongs to the same serving system as the old SGSN, or forwards the Update PDP Context Request to the GGSN of the old serving system (currently serving the target) in case the new SGSN does not belong to the same serving system as the old SGSN but to another one (e.g. in another country and/or operated by another operator).

Similarly as in connection with the above described method, also in connection with the serving system node according to the present invention, said serving system address of the serving system node represents information about the serving system to which said new serving node belongs. Said information about the serving system to which said serving node belongs comprises at least one of the following information items: serving node MSISDN number, serving node routing area identifier, serving node address, and said serving node routing area identifier contains information items representative of a mobile country code MCC, mobile network code MNC, location area code LAC, and routing area code RAC.

Thus, as will be appreciated from the foregoing description, with this invention, (when adhering to the chosen example of GPRS as a basis of a packet switched communication network and/or serving system), a new information element IE is added to the SGSN Context Request that identifies the network where the new SGSN is located. This information will be the E.164 (MSISDN) number of the SGSN, which includes information about the country and network, and/or a Routing Area Identity (RAI). This information is specified in 3GPP TS 23.003 and it is available in all SGSN's. (Both the MSISDN number in E.164 format and RAI are already defined in the ASN.1 object tree, given in 3GPP TS 33.108.)

This invention thus proposes that the old SGSN shall use for the purpose of lawful interception the new SGSN's RAI, once the old SGSN gets this information element with the ‘Identification Request’ message/SGSN context request message. The new SGSN sends the message once the MS/UE tries to attach to it.

Stated in other words, the detected serving system node change request may not only be a routing area update RAU request as shown in FIG. 2, but may also be an Attach Request as shown in FIG. 3 (taken also from 3GPP TS 23.060), which is subsequently processed as described above in connection with the RAU request (thus yielding an Identification Request modified according to the processing according to the present invention applied to the Attach Request).

After the old SGSN gets the new SGSN's MSISDN number and/or RAI, the lawful interception (LI) system can get it from the old SGSN (directly or via the GGSN) and LEA then gets the information (IRI data) about where the target is located.

In case user to be intercepted has at least one active PDP context, the new SGSN generates and sends an Update PDP Context Request to GGSN. The invention proposes to add the above mentioned new information element into that message as well. In this way, the LI system attached to GGSN can identify instances when user changes PLMN. (GGSN may report also to SGSN which then informs LI system).

As the protocol used between SGSN's, it is to be noted that GTP (GPRS Tunneling Protocol) specified in 3GPP TS 29.060 is used.

According to the invention, the information element is obtained once the target moves to an area of a new serving system node (i.e. new SGSN), from which LEA is for example not entitled to get any interception for this target. Therefore, it is proposed to pass the Routing Area Identifier RAI, which contains Mobile Country Code MCC, Mobile Network Code MNC, Location Area Code LAC and Routing Area Code RAC of the new SGSN, once the new SGSN is asking the old one to send the SGSN contexts. (Nevertheless, the proposed signaling also takes place if the target moves to a new serving node SGSN from which LEA is still entitled to get interception.)

In such a way, the old SGSN will come to know itself, and tell the LEA, that the target has moved out of the given warrant's (court order) jurisdiction. Besides, the RAI shall tell the LEA in which country and from which operator the target gets the services after the RAU.

Apparently, the above mentioned does not require any involvement of the HLR/HSS, so that there are no extra signaling tasks to perform. Protecting HLR resources is the effectively achieved by the invention, while easily finding out the location (country and more specific coordinates) and network (i.e. which visited network the target is using/attached to) to which the target is roaming.

The present invention thus addresses the three following sub procedures within the two procedures (Attach and Routing Area Update Procedure, respectively):

- SGSN Context Request/Response/Acknowledge (within the inter SGSN RAU procedure),
- Update PDP Context Request/Response (within the inter SGSN RAU procedure), and
- Identification Request/Response (within the Attach procedure).

Accordingly, as has been described herein above, the present invention proposes a method for informing a lawful interception system of the serving system serving an intercepted target MS roaming within a communication network system, the communication network system comprising at least one serving system each serving system comprising at least one serving system node SGSN serving the intercepted target for communication, the method comprising the steps of: first detecting a serving system node change request 1 from the intercepted target MS towards a new serving system node which is currently not serving the target, first processing said serving system node change request at said new serving system node currently not serving the target, wherein said processing comprises the inclusion, to the request, of a serving system address of the new serving system node currently not serving the target, and first forwarding said processed request 2 to an old serving system node currently serving the target. Also, the present invention proposes a serving system node adapted to be used in such a method.

Thus, from the foregoing description of the present invention, it will become clear that having regard to the previous solutions as outlined above with reference to 3GPP TS 33.108 V5.0.0 (2002-06) and 3GPP TS 33.107 V5.3.0 (2002-06), the present invention will lead to the changes to these agreed solutions as follows:

(note that numberings refer to the numbering of section in the respective technical specification TS)

A) As to 3GPP TS 33.108 V5.0.0 (2002-06):

6.5 IRI for Packet Domain

Intercept related information will in principle be available in the following phases of a data transmission:

- 1. At connection attempt when the target identity becomes active, at which time packet transmission may or may not occur (set up of a data context, target may be the originating or terminating party);
- 2. At the end of a connection, when the target identity becomes inactive (removal of a data context);
- 3. At certain times when relevant information are available.

In addition, information on non-transmission related actions of a target constitute IRI and is sent via HI2, e.g. information on subscriber controlled input.

The intercept related information (IRI) may be subdivided into the following categories:

- 1. Control information for HI2 (e.g. correlation information);
- 2. Basic data context information, for standard data transmission between two parties.

The events defined in ref [11] are used to generate records for the delivery via HI2.

There are eight different event types received at DF2 level. According to each event, a Record is sent to the LEMF if this is required. The following table gives the mapping between event type received at DF2 level and record type sent to the LEMF.

TABLE 6.1Mapping between UMTS Data Events and HI2 records typeEventIRI Record TypeGPRS attachREPORTGPRS detachREPORTPDP context activation (successful)BEGINPDP context modificationCONTINUEPDP context activation (unsuccessful)REPORTStart of intercept with PDP context activeBEGINPDP context deactivationENDLocation updateREPORTSMSREPORTServing SystemREPORT

A set of information is used to generate the records. The records used transmit the information from mediation function to LEMF. This set of information can be extended in the GSN or DF2 MF, if this is necessary in a specific country. The following table gives the mapping between information received per event and information sent in records.

TABLE 6.2Mapping between Events information and IRI informationparameterdescriptionHI2 ASN 1 parameterobserved MSISDNTarget Identifier with the MSISDN of the targetpartyInformation (party-identiity)subscriber (monitored subscriber).observed IMSITarget Identifier with the IMSI of the targetpartyInformation (party-identity)subscriber (monitored subscriber).observed IMEITarget Identifier with the IMEI of the targetpartyInformation (party-identity)subscriber (monitored subscriber)observed PDPPDP address used by the target..partyInformationaddress(services-data-information)event typeDescription which type of event is delivered: PDPgPRSeventContext Activation, PDP Context Deactivation, GPRSAttach, etc.event dateDate of the event generation in the xGSNtimeStampevent timeTime of the event generation in the xGSNaccess point nameThe APN of the access pointpartyInformation(services-data-information)PDP typeThis field describes the PDP type as defined in TSpartyInformationGSM 09.60, TS GSM 04.08, TS GSM 09.02(services-data-information)initiatorThis field indicates whether the PDP contextinitiatoractivation, deactivation, or modification is MSdirected or network initiated.correlation numberUnique number for each PDP context delivered togPRSCorrelationNumberthe LEMF, to help the LEA, to have a correlationbetween each PDP Context and the IRI.lawful interceptionUnique number for each lawful authorization.lawfulInterceptionIdentifieridentifierlocation informationThis field provides the service area identity, RAIlocationOfTheTargetand/or location area identity that is present at theSGSN at the time of event record production.SMSThe SMS content with header which is sent with thesMSSMS-servicefailed contextThis field gives information about the reason for agPRSOperationErrorCodeactivation reasonfailed context activation of the target subscriber.failed attach reasonThis field gives information about the reason for agPRSOperationErrorCodefailed attach attempt of the target subscriber.service centerThis field identifies the address of the relevantserviceCenterAddressaddressserver within the calling (if server is originating) orcalled (if server is terminating) party addressparameters for SMS-MO or SMS-MT.umts QOSThis field indicates the Quality of ServiceqOSassociated with the PDP Context procedure.contextThis field gives information about the reason forgPRSOperationErrorCodedeactivation reasoncontext deactivation of the target subscriber.network identifierOperator ID plus SGSN or GGSN address.networkIdentifieriP assignmentObserved PDP address is statically or dynamicallyiP-assignmentassigned.SMS originatingIdentifies the originator of the SMS message.DataNodeAddressaddressSMS terminatingIdentifies the intended recipient of the SMSDataNodeAddressaddressmessage.SMS initiatorIndicates whether the SMS is MO, MT, or Undefinedsms-initiatorserving SGSNAn E.164 number of the serving SGSN.ServingSGSN.NumbernumbersServing SGSNAn IP address of the serving SGSN.ServingSGSN-Addressaddressserving SGSN RAIRouting Area Identity of the new SGSNRai (servingSGSN-RAI)
NOTE:

LIID parameter must be present in each record sent to the LEMF.

6.5.1 Events and Information

This clause describes the information sent from the Delivery Function (DF) to the Law Enforcement Monitoring Facility (LEMF) to support Lawfully Authorized Electronic Surveillance (LAES). The information is described as records and information carried by a record. This focus is on describing the information being transferred to the LEMF.

The IRI events and data are encoded into records as defined in the Table 6-1 Mapping between GPRS Events and HI2 records type and Annex B.3 Intercept related information (HI2) [1]. IRI is described in terms of a ‘causing event’ and information associated with that event. Within each IRI Record there is a set of events and associated information elements to support the particular service. The communication events described in Table 6-1: Mapping between GPRS Events and HI2 record type and Table 6-2: Mapping between Events information and IRI information convey the basic information for reporting the disposition of a communication. This clause describes those events and supporting information.

Each record described in this clause consists of a set of parameters. Each parameter is either:

- mandatory (M)—required for the record,
- conditional (C)—required in situations where a condition is met (the condition is given in the Description), or
- optional (O)—provided at the discretion of the implementation.

The information to be carried by each parameter is identified. Both optional and conditional parameters are considered to be OPTIONAL syntactically in ASN.1 Stage 3 descriptions. The Stage 2 inclusion takes precedence over Stage 3 syntax.

6.5.1.1 REPORT Record Information

The REPORT record is used to report non-communication related subscriber actions (events) and for reporting unsuccessful packet-mode communication attempts.

The REPORT record shall be triggered when:

- the intercept subject's mobile station performs a GPRS attach procedure (successful or unsuccessful);
- the intercept subject's mobile station performs a GPRS detach procedure;
- the intercept subject's mobile station is unsuccessful at performing a PDP context activation procedure;
- the intercept subject's mobile station performs a cell, routing area, or combined cell and routing area update. The new SGSN always reports the event, if applicable. The old SGSN should report the event;
- the intercept subject's mobile station sends an SMS-Mobile Originated (MO) communication. Dependent on national requirements, the triggering event shall occur either when the 3G SGSN receives the SMS from the target MS or, when the 3G SGSN receives notification that the SMS-Centre successfully received the SMS;
- for GSM and UMTS systems deployed in the U.S., a REPORT record shall be triggered when the 3G SGSN receives an SMS-MO communication from the intercept subject's mobile station;
- the intercept subject's mobile station receives a SMS Mobile-Terminated (MT) communication. Dependent on national requirements, the triggering event shall occur either when the 3G SGSN receives the SMS from the SMS-Centre or, when the 3G SGSN receives notification that the target MS successfully received the SMS;
- for GSM and UMTS systems deployed in the U.S., a REPORT record shall be triggered when the 3G SGSN receives an SMS-MT communication from the SMS-Centre destined for the intercept subject's mobile station;

as a national option, a mobile terminal is authorized for service with another network operator or service provider.

TABLE 6.3GPRS Attach REPORT RecordParameterMOCDescription/Conditionsobserved MSISDNCProvide at least one and othersobserved IMSIwhen available.observed IMEIevent typeCProvide GPRS Attach event type.event dateMProvide the date and time the event isevent timedetected.network identifierMShall be provided.lawful intercept identifierMShall be provided.location informationCProvide, when authorized, to identifylocation information for the interceptsubject's MS.failed attach reasonCProvide information about the reasonfor failed attach attempts of thetarget subscriber.serving SGSN RAICProvided only by the old SGSN,when the alternative serving systemreporting is supported, and if the newSGSN sends the IdentificationRequest to it.

TABLE 6.4

GPRS Detach REPORT Record

Parameter
MOC
Description/Conditions

observed MSISDN
C
Provide at least one and others

observed IMSI

when available.

observed IMEI

event type
C
Provide GPRS Detach event type.

event date
M
Provide the date and time the event

event time

is detected.

network identifier
M
Shall be provided.

lawful intercept identifier
M
Shall be provided.

location information
C
Provide, when authorized, to identify

location information for the intercept

subject's MS.

TABLE 6.5

PDP Context Activation (unsuccessful) REPORT Record

Parameter
MOC
Description/Conditions

observed MSISDN
C
Provide at least one and others when available.

observed IMSI

observed IMEI

observed PDP address
C
Provide to identify either the:

static address requested by the intercept subject's MS in

association with a subject-initiated PDP context activation

request for unsuccessful PDP context activation requests; or

address offered by the network in association with a network-

initiated PDP context activation request when the intercept

subject's MS rejects the network-initiated PDP context

activation.

iP assignment
C
Provide to indicate observed PDP address is statically or

dynamically assigned.

event type
C
Provide PDP Context Activation event type.

event date
M
Provide the date and time the event is detected.

event time

access point name
C
Provide to identify either the:

packet data network to which the intercept subject requested

to be connected when the intercept subject's mobile station is

unsuccessful at performing a PDP context activation

procedure (MS to Network); or

access point at the packet data network that requested to be

connected to the MS when the intercept subject's mobile

station rejects a network-initiated PDP context activation

(Network to MS).

PDP type
C
Provide to describe the PDP type of the observed PDP address.

The PDP Type defines the end user protocol to be used between

the external packet data network and the MS.

initiator
C
Provide to indicate whether the PDP context activation is

network-initiated, intercept-subject-initiated, or not available.

network identifier
M
Shall be provided.

lawful intercept identifier
M
Shall be provided.

location information
C
Provide, when authorized, to identify location information for the

intercept subject's MS.

failed context activation
C
Provide information about the reason for failed context activation

reason

attempts of the target subscriber.

QOS
C
Provide to identify the QOS parameters.

TABLE 6.6

Location Information Update (with No PDP Context Active)

REPORT Record

Parameter
MOC
Description/Conditions

observed MSISDN
C
Provide at least one and others

observed IMSI

when available.

observed IMEI

event type
C
Provide Location Information Update

event type.

event date
M
Provide the date and time the event

event time

is detected.

network identifier
M
Shall be provided.

lawful intercept identifier
M
Shall be provided.

location information
C
Provide, when authorized, to identify

location information for the intercept

subject's MS.

serving SGSN RAI
C
Provided only by the old SGSN,

when the alternative serving system

reporting is supported, and if the new

SGSN sends the Identification

Request to it.

serving SGSN number
C
Provided only by the old

SGSN, when the alternative serving

system reporting is supported, and if the

new SGSN sends the Identification

Request to it.

TABLE 6.7

SMS-MO and SMS-MT Communication REPORT Record

Parameter
MOC
Description/Conditions

observed MSISDN
C
Provide at least one and

observed IMSI

others when available.

observed IMEI

event type
C
Provide SMS event type.

event date
M
Provide the date and time the event

event time

is detected.

network identifier
M
Shall be provided.

lawful intercept identifier
M
Shall be provided.

SMS originating address
O
Provide to identify the originating

SMS destination address

and destination address of the SMS

message

location information
C
Provide, when authorized, to identify

location information for the intercept

subject's MS.

SMS
C
Provide to deliver SMS content,

including header which is sent with

the SMS-service.

service center address
C
Provide to identify the address of

the relevant SMS-C server. If SMS

content is provided, this parameter

is optional.

SMS initiator
M
Indicates whether the SMS is MO,

MT, or Undefined.

TABLE 6.8

Serving System REPORT Record

Parameter
MOC
Description/Conditions

observed MSISDN
C
Provide at least one and others

observed IMSI

when available.

observed IMEI

event type
C
Provide Serving system event type.

event date
M
Provide the date and time the event

event time

is detected.

network identifier
M
Network identifier of the HLR

reporting the event.

lawful intercept identifier
M
Shall be provided.

ServingSGSN-Number
C
Provide to identify the E.164 number

of the serving SGSN.

ServinSGSN-Address
C
Provide to identify the IP address

of the serving SGSN.

6.5.1.2 BEGIN Record Information

The BEGIN record is used to convey the first event of packet-data communication interception.

The BEGIN record shall be triggered when:

- successful PDP context activation;

the interception of a subject's communications is started and at least one PDP context is active. If more than one PDP context is active, a BEGIN record shall be generated for each PDP context that is active.

TABLE 6.9PDP Context Activation (successful) BEGIN RecordParameterMOCDescription/Conditionsobserved MSISDNCProvide at least one and others when available.observed IMSIobserved IMEIobserved PDP addressCProvide to identify one of the following:static address requested by the intercept subject's MS, andallocated by the Network for a successful PDP contextactivation;address allocated dynamically by the network to the interceptsubject MS in association with a PDP context activation (i.e.,address is sent by the Network in an Activate PDP ContextAccept) for a successful PDP context activation procedurewhen the PDP Context activation request does not contain astatic PDP address; oraddress offered by the network in association with a network-initiated PDP context activation request when the interceptsubject's MS accepts the network-initiated PDP contextactivation request.iP assignmentCProvide to indicate observed PDP address is statically ordynamically assigned.event typeCProvide PDP Context-Activation event type.event dateMProvide the date and time the event is detected.event timeaccess point nameCProvide to identify the:packet data network to which the intercept subject requestedto be connected when the intercept subject's MS is successfulat performing a PDP context activation procedure (MS toNetwork).access point of the packet data network that requested to beconnected to the MS when the intercept subject's MS accepts anetwork-initiated PDP context activation (Network to MS).PDP typeCProvide to describe the PDP type of the observed PDP address.The PDP Type defines the end user protocol to be used betweenthe external packet data network and the MS.initiatorCProvide to indicate whether the PDP context activation isnetwork-initiated, intercept-subject-initiated, or not available.network identifierMShall be provided.correlation numberCProvide to uniquely identify the PDP context delivered to theLEMF and to correlate IRI records with CC.lawful intercept identifierMShall be provided.location informationCProvide, when authorized, to identify location information for theintercept subject's MS.QOSCProvide to identify the QOS parameters.

TABLE 6.10

Start Of Interception (with PDP Context Active) BEGIN Record

Parameter
MOC
Description/Conditions

observed MSISDN
C
Provide at least one and others when available.

observed IMSI

observed IMEI

observed PDP address
C
Provide to identify the:

static address requested by the intercept subject's MS, and

allocated by the Network for a successful PDP context

activation.

address allocated dynamically by the network to the intercept

subject MS in association with a PDP context activation (i.e.,

address is sent by the Network in an Activate PDP Context

Accept) for a successful PDP context activation procedure

when the PDP Context activation request does not contain a

static PDP address.

address offered by the network in association with a network-

initiated PDP context activation request when the intercept

subject's MS accepts the network-initiated PDP context

activation request

event type
C
Provide Start Of Interception With PDP Context Active event type.

event date
M
Provide the date and time the event is detected.

event time

access point name
C
Provide to identify the:

packet data network to which the intercept subject requested

to be connected when the intercept subject's MS is successful

at performing a PDP context activation procedure (MS to

Network).

access point of the packet data network that requested to be

connected to the MS when the intercept subject's MS accepts a

network-initiated PDP context activation (Network to MS).

PDP type
C
Provide to describe the PDP type of the observed PDP address.

The PDP Type defines the end user protocol to be used between

the external packet data network and the MS.

initiator
C
Provide to indicate whether the PDP context activation is

network-initiated, intercept-subject-initiated, or not available.

network identifier
M
Shall be provided.

correlation number
C
Provide to uniquely identify the PDP context delivered to the

LEMF and to correlate IRI records with CC.

lawful intercept identifier
M
Shall be provided.

location information
C
Provide, when authorized, to identify location information for the

intercept subject's MS.

QOS
C
Provide to identify the QOS parameters.

6.5.1.3 CONTINUE Record Information

The CONTINUE record is used to convey events during an active packet-data communication PDP Context.

The CONTINUE record shall be triggered when:

An active PDP context is modified;

TABLE 6.11PDP Context Modification CONTINUE RecordParameterMOCDescription/Conditionsobserved MSISDNCProvide at least one and others when available.observed IMSIobserved IMEIobserved PDP addressCThe observed address after modificationProvide to identify the:static address requested by the intercept subject's MS, andallocated by the Network for a successful PDP contextactivation.address allocated dynamically by the network to the interceptsubject MS in association with a PDP context activation (i.e.,address is sent by the Network in an Activate PDP ContextAccept) for a successful PDP context activation procedurewhen the PDP Context activation request does not contain astatic PDP address.address offered by the network in association with a network-initiated PDP context activation request when the interceptsubject's MS accepts the network-initiated PDP contextactivation request.event typeCProvide the PDP Context Modification event type.event dateMProvide the date and time the event is detected.event timeaccess point nameCProvide to identify the:packet data network to which the intercept subject requestedto be connected when the intercept subject's MS is successfulat performing a PDP context activation procedure (MS toNetwork).access point of the packet data network that requested to beconnected to the MS when the intercept subject's MS accepts anetwork-initiated PDP context activation (Network to MS).PDP typeCProvide to describe the PDP type of the observed PDP address.The PDP Type defines the end user protocol to be used betweenthe external packet data network and the MS.initiatorCProvide to indicate whether the PDP context activation isnetwork-initiated, intercept-subject-initiated, or not available.network identifierMShall be provided.correlation numberCProvide to uniquely identify the PDP context delivered to theLEMF used to correlate IRI records with CC.lawful intercept identifierMShall be provided.location informationCProvide, when authorized, to identify location information for theintercept subject's MS.QOSCProvide to identify the QOS parameters.serving SGSN RAICProvided only by the old SGSN, when the alternative servingsystem reporting is supported, and if the new SGSN sends theIdentification Request to it.serving SGSN numberCProvided only by the old SGSN, when the alternative servingsystem reporting is supported, and if the new SGSN sends theIdentification Request to it.

6.5.1.4 END Record Information

The END record is used to convey the last event of packet-data communication interception.

The END record shall be triggered when:

PDP context deactivation.

TABLE 6.12PDP Context Deactivation END RecordParameterMOCDescription/Conditionsobserved MSISDNCProvide at least one and others when available.observed IMSIobserved IMEIobserved PDP addressCProvide to identify the PDP address assigned to the interceptsubject, if available.event typeCProvide PDP Context Deactivation event type.event dateMProvide the date and time the event is detected.event timeaccess point nameCProvide to identify the packet data network to which the interceptsubject is connected.PDP typeCProvide to describe the PDP type of the observed PDP address.The PDP Type defines the end user protocol to be used betweenthe external packet data network and the MS.initiatorCProvide to indicate whether the PDP context deactivation isnetwork-initiated, intercept-subject-initiated, or not available.network identifierMShall be provided.correlation numberCProvide to uniquely identify the PDP context delivered to the LEMand to correlate IRI records with CC.lawful intercept identifierMShall be provided.location informationCProvide, when authorized, to identify location information for theintercept subject's MS.context deactivation reasonCProvide to indicate reason for deactivation.

6.6 IRI Reporting for Packet Domain at GGSN

As a national option, in the case where the GGSN is reporting IRI for an intercept subject, the intercept subject is handed off to another SGSN and the GGSN continues to handle the content of communications subject to roaming agreements, the GGSN shall continue to report the following IRI of the content of communication:

- PDP context activation;
- PDP context deactivation;
- Start of interception with PDP context active;
- PDP context modification.

6.7 Content of Communication Interception for Packet Domain at GGSN

As a national option, in the case where the GGSN is performing interception of the content of communications, the intercept subject is handed off to another SGSN and the same GGSN continues to handle the content of communications subject to roaming agreements, the GGSN shall continue to perform the interception of the content of communication.

Next Modification

IRI-Parameters ::= SEQUENCE

{

hi2DomainId
[0] OBJECT IDENTIFIER, -- 3GPP HI2 domain

iRIversion
[23] ENUMERATED

{

version2(2),

...

} OPTIONAL,

-- if not present, it means version 1 is handled

lawfulInterceptionIdentifier [1] LawfulInterceptionIdentifier,

-- This identifier is associated to the target.

timeStamp
[3] TimeStamp,

-- date and time of the event triggering the report.)

initiator
[4] ENUMERATED

{

not-Available
(0),

originating-Target
(1),

-- in case of GPRS, this indicates that the PDP context activation

-- or deactivation is MS requested

terminating-Target
(2),

-- in case of GPRS, this indicates that the PDP context activation or

-- deactivation is network initiated

...

} OPTIONAL,

locationOfTheTarget
[8] Location OPTIONAL,

-- location of the target subscriber

partyInformation
[9] SET SIZE (1..10) OF PartyInformation OPTIONAL,

-- This parameter provides the concerned party, the identiy(ies) of the party

--}and all the information provided by the party.

serviceCenterAddress
[13] PartyInformation OPTIONAL,

-- e.g. in case of SMS message this parameter provides the address of the relevant

-- server within the calling (if server is originating) or called (if server is

-- terminating) party address parameters

sMS
[14] SMS-report OPTIONAL,

-- this parameter provides the SMS content and associated information

national-Parameters
[16] National-Parameters OPTIONAL,

gPRSCorrelationNumber
[18] GPRSCorrelationNumber OPTIONAL,

gPRSevent
[20] GPRSEvent OPTIONAL,

-- This information is used to provide particular action of the target

-- such as attach/detach

sgsnAddress
[21] DataNodeAddress OPTIONAL,

gPRSOperationErrorCode
[22] GPRSOperationErrorCode OPTIONAL,

ggsnAddress
[24] DataNodeAddress OPTIONAL,

qOS
[25] UmtsQos OPTIONAL,

networkIdentifier
[26] Network-Identifier OPTIONAL,

sMSOriginatingAddress
[27] DataNodeAddress OPTIONAL,

sMSTerminatingAddress
[28] DataNodeAddress OPTIONAL,

iMSevent
[29] IMSEvent OPTIONAL,

sIPMessage
[30] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL,

servingSGSN-number
[31] OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..20)) OPTIONAL,

servingSGSN-address
[32] OCTET STRING (SIZE (5..17)) OPTIONAL,

servingSGSN-RAI
[33] Rai OPTIONAL,

...

}

Next Modification

GPRSEvent ::= ENUMERATED

{

pDPContextActivation
(1),

startOfInterceptionWithPDPContextActive
(2),

-- reported by a new SGSN or GGSN.-

pDPContextDeactivation
(4),

gPRSAttach
(5),

gPRSDetach
(6),

locationInfoUpdate
(10),

-- reported by a new SGSN

sMS
(11),

pDPContextModification
(13),

-- reported by SGSN or GGSN

servingSystem
(14),

...

-- is it correct to leave this extensibility ellipsis here?

gPRSAttachAnotherSGSN
(15),

-- reported by an old SGSN, if it receives the Identification Request

message

locationInfoUpdate
(16),

-- reported by an old SGSN

startOfInterceptionWithPDPContextActive
(17),

-- reported by an old SGSN

...

}

-- see ref [190]

and

B) As tp 3GPP TS 33.107 V5.3.0 (2002-06):

Next Modification

7.3.2 Structure of the Events

There are eight different events in which the information is sent to the DF2 if this is required. Details are described in the following section. The events for interception are configurable (if they are sent to DF2) in the 3G GSN or the HLR and can be suppressed in the DF2.

The Following Events are Applicable to 3G SGSN:

- Mobile Station Attach;
- Mobile Station Detach;
- PDP context activation;
- Start of intercept with PDP context active;
- PDP context modification;
- PDP context deactivation;
- RA update;
- SMS.
- NOTE: 3G GGSN interception is a national option. Location information may not be available in the case.

The Following Events are Applicable to the 3G GGSN:

- PDP context activation;
- PDP context modification;
- PDP context deactivation;
- Start of interception with PDP context active.

The Following Events are Applicable to the HLR:

- Roaming.

A set of fields as shown below is used to generate the events. The events transmit the information from 3G GSN or HLR to DF2. This set of fields as shown below can be extended in the 3G GSN or HLR, if this is necessary as a national option. DF2 can extend this information if this is necessary as a national option e.g. a unique number for each surveillance warrant.

TABLE 2Information Events for Packet Data Event RecordsObserved MSISDNMSISDN of the target subscriber (monitered subscriber).Observed IMSIIMSI of the target subscriber (monitered subscriber).Observed IMEIIMEI of the target subscriber (monitored subscriber), it shall be checked for each activation over the radiointerface.Event typeDescription which type of event is delivered: MS attach, MS detach, PDP context activation, Start of interceptwith PDP context active, POP context deactivation, SMS, Serving System, Cell and/or RA update from newSGSN, Cell and/or RA update from old SGSN, PDP context modification from new SGSN, PDP contextmodification from GGSN.Event dateDate of the event generation in the 3G GSN or the HLR.Event timeTime of the event generation in the 3G GSN or the HLR.PDP addressThe PDP address of the target subscriber. Note that this address might be dynamic.Access Point NameThe APN of the access point. (Typically the GGSN of the other party).Location InformationLocation Information is the Service Area Identity (SAI), RAI and/or location area identity that is present at theGSN at the time of event record production.PDP TypeThe used PDP type.Correlation NumberThe-correlation number is used to correlate CC and IRI.SMSThe SMS content with header which is sent with the SMS-service. The header also includes the SMS-Centreaddress.Network Element Identifier. Unique identifier for the element reporting the ICE.Failed attach reasonReason for failed attach of the target subscriber.Failed context activation reasonReason for failed context activation of the target subscriber.IAsThe observed Interception Areas.Session InitiatorThe initiator of the PDP context activation, deactivation or modification request either the network or the 3GMS.InitiatorSMS indicator whether the SMS is MO or MT.Deactivation/termination causeThe termination cause of the PDP context.QoSThis field indicates the Quality of Service associated with the PDP Context procedure.Serving System AddressInformation about the serving system (e.g. serving SGSN MSISDN number, serving SGSN RAI or servingSGSN address).

Next Modification

7.4.1 Mobile Station Attach

For attach an attach-event is generated. When an attach activation is generated from the mobile to servicing 3G SG-SN this event is generated. These fields will be delivered to the DF2 if available:

Observed MSISDNObserved IMSIObserved IMEIEvent TypeEvent TimeEvent DateNetwork Element IdentifierLocation InformationFailed attach reasonIAs (if applicable)

In case the alternative serving system reporting is supported, and if the new SGSN sends the Identification Request to the old SGSN, then the old SGSN should deliver the following fields to the DF2:

Observed MSISDNObserved IMSIObserved IMEIEvent TypeEvent TimeEvent DateNetwork Element IdentifierLocation InformationNew SGSN's RAI

Next Modification

7.4.6 RA Update

For each RA update an update-event with the fields about the new location is generated. These fields shall be delivered by new SGSN to the DF2 if available:

Observed MSISDNObserved IMSIObserved IMEIEvent TypeEvent TimeEvent DateNetwork Element IdentifierLocation InformationIAs (if applicable)

These fields may be delivered by old SGSN to the DF2 if available:

Observed MSISDNObserved IMSIObserved IMEIEvent TypeEvent TimeEvent DateNetwork Element IdentifierLocation InformationIAs (if applicable)New SGSN's Serving System Address

Next Modification

7.4.8 Packet Data PDP Context Modification

This event shall be generated if interception for a target is started and if the target has at least one PDP context active. These fields shall be delivered by new SGSN to the DF2 if available:

Observed MSISDNObserved IMSIObserved IMEIPDP address of observed partyEvent TypeEvent TimeEvent DateCorrelation numberAccess Point NamePDP TypeNetwork Element IdentifierLocation InformationIAs (if applicable)Session InitiatorQoS

These fields may be delivered by GGSN to the DF2 if available:

Observed MSISDNObserved IMSIPDP address of observed partyEvent TypeEvent TimeEvent DateCorrelation numberAccess Point NamePDP TypeNetwork Element IdentifierSession InitiatorQoSNew SGSN's Serving System Address

7.4.9 Serving System

In case the network does not support alternative serving system reporting, the Serving System report event is generated at the HLR, when the HLR has detected that the intercept subject has roamed. The fields will be delivered to the DF2 if available:

Observed MSISDNObserved IMSIEvent TypeEvent TimeEvent DateNetwork Element IdentifierServing System Address

When the network supports the alternative serving system reporting, the following events shall be generated:

- RA Update by old SGSN (in addition to the RA Update by new SGSN)
- Packet Data PDP context modification by GGSN (in addition to the Packet Data PDP context modification by new SGSN)
- Attach from the old SGSN in case the alternative serving system reporting is supported, and if the new SGSN sends the Identification Request to the old SGSN

In order to support the alternative serving system reporting, new SGSN should put its own RAI and/or MSISDN number into the Private Extension IE of the following GTP-C messages:

- SGSN Context Request, sent to the old SGSN
- Update PDP context Request, sent to GGSN

Formats of the RAI and MSISDN number are e.g. defined in the GTP specification [7].

While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, the description is illustrative of the invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Number	Date	Country	Kind
20 11 866.5	Jul 2002	EP	regional
202 19 271.7	Dec 2002	EP	regional

Informing a lawful interception system of the serving system an intercepted target

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

CPC

US Classifications

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (2)

PCT Information