Infrared absorbing blue glass composition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6995102
  • Patent Number
    6,995,102
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 16, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 7, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
A blue glass composition comprises a soda-lime-silica base and a colorant portion consisting essentially of about 0.4 to 0.65 weight percent total iron oxide, about 0.1 to 0.3 weight percent manganese oxide, and cobalt oxide in an amount effective to produce a cobalt concentration of about 0.0002 to 0.0013 weight percent (about 2 to 13 ppm). The glass is characterized by a ratio of ferrous oxide to total iron oxide between about 0.43 and 0.58. The glass composition exhibits a combination of high visible transmittance, high infrared absorption and enhanced blue coloration. This is attributed in large part to the combination of ferrous oxide and cobalt oxide and to the effect of manganese oxide in reducing iron sulfide formation and thereby avoiding amber coloration.
Description

The invention relates to a blue soda-lime-silica glass composition that contains a colorant portion comprising iron oxide and cobalt oxide and further comprising manganese oxide to reduce amber color attributed to reaction of iron oxide with sulfate refining agents.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It would be advantageous to improve infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) absorption of soda-lime-silica glass products while maintaining a high visible transmission. For example, automotive vehicles require glass having high visible transmittance to assure optimum visibility for the operator. Infrared and ultraviolet light do not improve visibility, but generate heat within the passenger compartment and, particularly during summertime driving, increase the load on the air conditioning system to maintain comfort levels.


Iron oxide is commonly added to glass to produce a green color. In glass, iron oxide is found in two chemical forms. The oxidized compound is ferric oxide, Fe2O3, and is yellow. The reduced compound is ferrous oxide, FeO, and is blue. Advantageously, ferric oxide absorbs a portion of ultraviolet light passing through the glass product; and ferrous oxide absorbs a portion of infrared light passing through the glass product. Under typical furnace melting conditions, when the total iron oxide in the glass product is within the range of about 0.3 to 0.8 weight percent, the iron oxide equilibrium is such that the redox ratio of FeO to total iron oxide is about 0.23 to 0.26, which imparts a green color to the glass. As used herein, total iron oxide refers to weight of an equivalent amount of iron as ferrous oxide, Fe2O3. Also, as used herein, compositional percentages are based upon weight, except as otherwise noted.


During melting, it is common practice to add a sulfate compound, typically sodium sulfate, and a carbonaceous material, typically anthracite coal, for refining purposes. In the presence of carbon, the sulfate compound dissociates to form sulfur oxide that facilitates the removal of bubbles from the molten glass, which would otherwise produce defects in the product.


It is also desirable to produce glass having a dark blue coloration for aesthetic purposes. It is known that increasing the proportion of ferrous oxide relative to ferric oxide shifts the glass color from green to blue. This is readily accomplished by increasing the addition of carbonaceous material to the glass melt, whereupon the additional carbon reacts with ferric oxide to form additional ferrous oxide. However, decreasing the ferrous oxide reduces infrared absorption by the glass. Moreover, attempts to compensate by increasing the total iron concentration to maintain a high infrared absorption reduces visible transmittance of the glass and is not desired. This is attributed, in part, to a reaction between iron and sulfur derived from the sulfate refining agent to produce iron sulfide, which imparts an amber coloration that dramatically decreases visible transmittance and also shifts the color of the glass so that the desired aesthetically blue coloration is not achieved. It is also known to produce blue glass by additions of cobalt oxide. However, when added to glass containing iron sulfide, the amber coloration shifts the dominant wavelength away from the desired blue range and reduces visible transmittance.


Therefore, a need exists for a glass having enhanced blue coloration as indicated by a high excitation purity that is not diminished by iron sulfide amber or other non-blue coloration, and which further exhibits a high visible transmittance and high infrared absorption.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a blue glass composition that comprises a soda-lime-silica base and a colorant portion consisting essentially of about 0.4 to 0.65 wt.% total iron oxide, reported as Fe2O3; about 0.1 to 0.3 weight percent manganese oxide reported as MnO2; and cobalt oxide in an amount effective to produce a cobalt concentration of about 0.0002 to 0.0013 weight percent (about 2 to 13 ppm). The iron oxide includes significant concentrations of both ferric oxide and ferrous oxide, such that the ratio of FeO to total iron oxide is between about 0.43 and 0.58. As used herein, iron and manganese concentrations are reported based upon weights of equivalent amounts of Fe2O3 and MnO, respectively, whereas cobalt additions are reported based upon elemental weight.


Glass compositions according to this invention have the following spectral properties, measured at 4.0 mm thickness: about 68 to 76 percent Illuminant A transmittance (LTA); about 54 to 64 percent ultraviolet transmittance; about 12 to 22 percent infrared transmittance; about 38 to 47 percent total solar energy transmittance; a dominant wavelength between about 486 and 490 nanometers, preferably between 488 and 489 nanometers; and an excitation purity between about 7 and 11 percent.


Thus, glass composition in accordance to this invention exhibits an unexpected combination of high visible transmittance, high infrared absorption, and enhanced blue coloration. The enhanced blue coloration is demonstrated by the dominant wavelength in the blue spectrum and the relatively high excitation purity, and is attributed to the combination of ferrous oxide and cobalt oxide. The increased ferrous proportion, indicated by the relatively high redox ratio, also results in high infrared absorption. It is unexpectedly found that, despite the relatively high ferrous content, as well as the cobalt oxide presence, the manganese oxide addition is effective to reduce iron sulfide formation and thus avoid amber coloration. Still further, the cobalt oxide levels, with presence of ferrous oxide, are effective to enhance blue coloration, while being suitably low to avoid reducing visible transmittance. Thus, blue glass in accordance with this invention is particularly well suited for automotive or architectural use to provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance and high visible transmittance, while absorbing infrared radiation to reduce solar heating and thus the load on air conditioning systems required to cool compartments having windows formed of the glass.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of this invention, flat soda-lime-silica glass having an enhanced blue coloration is provided to use as automotive or architectural glazing. The blue glass comprises a soda-lime-silica base to which colorant is added and is conveniently made by the float glass process. A preferred base is composed of between about 68 to 75 weight percent SiO2, 0 to about 5 weight percent Al2O3, about 5 to 15 weight percent CaO, 0 to about 10 weight percent MgO, about 10 to 18 weight percent Na2O and 0 to about 5 weight percent K2O. The preferred base is further characterized by a total CaO and MgO between about 6 to 15 weight percent and a total Na2O and K2O between about 10 to 20 weight percent. Preferably SO3 is between about 0.03 to 0.12 weight percent, more preferably between about 0.05 to 0.08 weight percent.


Blue glass in accordance with this invention also contains a colorant portion comprising iron oxide, manganese compound; and cobalt oxide.


Iron oxide is added in an amount effective to reduce ultraviolet and infrared transmittance. The total iron oxide, reported as Fe2O3, is preferably between about 0.4 to 0.65 weight percent. The iron oxide is conveniently added as ferric oxide and reacts with carbon or other reducing agents added to the melt during processing to form ferrous oxide. The proportion of ferrous oxide is characterized by the redox ratio, which the proportion by weight of FeO to total iron oxide, and is preferably between about 0.43 to 0.58.


It is found that the addition of manganese compound suppresses iron sulfide formation which would otherwise result from reaction between ferrous iron and sulfur derived from sulfate refining agents added to the glass melt during processing and produce undesirable amber coloration. Preferably, manganese is added in an amount between about 0.1 to 0.3 weight percent based on MnO2. Manganese may be readily added in any suitable form, including MnO2, Mn3O4, MnO, MnCO3, MnSO4, MnF2, and MnCl2.


The blue glass composition is preferably formed as a melt using a sulfate refining agent. Raising the redox ratio above the preferred range, particularly about 0.62, tends to result in formation of iron sulfide and the presence of the amber chromophore. In accordance with this invention, the blue glass composition contains cobalt oxide to enhance blue coloration without the undesired amber. Preferred cobalt content is between about 0.0002 and 0.0013 weight percent (2 and 13 ppm). More preferably, it is found that additions between about 0.0003 and 0.0010 weight percent (3 and 10 ppm) cobalt are effective to produce uniform and consistent coloration despite variation in the iron oxide content within the preferred ranges, while avoiding effects of cobalt on other glass properties.


The blue glass composition is preferably formed by a batch mixing process wherein raw materials are admixed and melted and the melt is feed to a conventional float glass furnace. By way of a preferred example, blue glass is made by admixing the raw materials in Table I within the recited ranges.












TABLE I







RAW MATERIAL
WEIGHT IN POUNDS (LBS.)









SAND
1000



SODA ASH
290 TO 350



DOLOMITE
215 TO 260



LIMESTONE
70 TO 90



SALT CAKE
 2 TO 15



ROUGE (97% Fe2O3)
 3.5 TO 11.5



MANGANESE DIOXIDE
0.65 TO 6.5 



COBALT OXIDE
0.004 TO 0.025



ANTHRACITE COAL
  1 TO 2.5



NEPHELINE SYENITE
 0 TO 150










A preferred anthracite coal is commercially available from the Shamokin Filler Company under the trade designation Carbocite and comprises about 70 to 72 weight percent carbon. Alternately, graphite or other carbonaceous material may be suitably used as a source of reactive carbon. For graphite, a suitable addition is from 0.7 to 2.1 pounds of graphite per 1000 pounds of sand. Salt cake comprises sodium sulfate. In the presence of anthracite coal, the sulfate forms sulfur oxide that purges gasses from the melt that would otherwise form defects in the product. Additional coal in excess of the amount required for sulfate reaction is added to shift the iron oxide equilibrium to reduce the iron oxide derived form the rouge and form the desired ferrous oxide. Alternately, a coal slag commercially available from Calumite Corporation under the trade designation Melite, may be used instead of rouge in an amount up to about 55 pounds per 1000 pounds of sand. About 80% of the total iron oxide in Melite is ferrous oxide, thereby allowing the amount of the carbon addition to be reduced. Iron oxide may also be suitably added as cullet. Generally, increasing the quantity of sodium sulfate in the glass tends to shift the iron oxide equilibrium slightly toward oxidizing, whereas increasing carbon concentration in the glass batch shifts the iron oxide equilibrium toward reducing. Another influence on the iron oxide equilibrium is the peak furnace temperature. Increasing furnace temperature shifts the iron oxide equilibrium toward reduced ferrous oxide, whereas decreasing furnace temperature shifts toward the oxidized state.


Blue glass having enhanced blue coloration in accordance with this invention was made in laboratory melts in accordance with the following procedure. A base composition was formed of 100 grams sand, 32.22 grams soda ash, 8.81 grams limestone, 23.09 grams dolomite, 0.75 to 2.0 grams of sodium sulfate, 0.1 to 0.25 grams of carbocite, and 2.64 grams of nepheline syenite. To the base was added rouge, manganese dioxide, and cobalt oxide in amounts to achieve a desired colorant composition. The raw materials were dry mixed in a glass jar for 10 minutes using a Turbula mixer, and loaded into a platinum-rhodium crucible. A small amount of water was added to the dry mixture. The mixture was then melted in a gas-fired furnace for 1 hour at 2600° F. The melt was fritted, and the crucible plunged into cold water, whereupon the glass formed solid particles. The crucible was reheated to remelt the glass, and the fritting process was repeated. Thereafter, the glass was melted for 4 hours at 2600° F. The melt was poured into a graphite mold and cooled slowly. The solidified glass was annealed by heating quickly to 1050° F, holding for 2 hours, and then slowly cooling over a period of about 14 hours. Samples were ground and polished to about 4.0 mm thickness and tested to measure spectral properties. Results are reported in Table II, wherein % LTA is the percentage of transmittance using illuminant A and % LTC is the percentage transmittance using illuminant C, and % Fe2O3 is the weight percentage of total iron oxide.
















TABLE II







Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
Example 6






















% LTA
73.19
74.48
69.89
69.31
68.92
68.68


% LTC
75.68
76.92
72.77
72.17
71.83
71.53


Dominant Wavelength
487.8
488.2
488.6
488.1
488
487


% Excitation Purity
8.5
8
9.8
10
10.3
10.5


% UltraViolet
62.86
63.04
56.52
55.75
56.39
56.51


Transmittance


% Infrared
20.58
21.11
13.21
14.2
13.64
15.61


Transmittance


% Total Solar Energy
45.42
46.2
39.52
39.93
39.49
40.71


% Fe2O3
0.453
0.453
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603


% FeO
0.236
0.24
0.318
0.305
0.312
0.288


Redox Ratio
0.521
0.530
0.527
0.506
0.517
0.478


% MnO2
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


ppm Co
4
6
3
6
7
13









Examples 7 through 12 were prepared in accordance with the aforementioned procedure and contained equal amounts of total iron oxide, and with varying amounts of cobalt oxide additions and varying redox ratios. The samples exhibited similar blue coloration despite the variations in cobalt oxide and redox ratio. As shown by the results, visible transmittance decreased as cobalt oxide content increased.
















TABLE III







Example 7
Example 8
Example 9
Example 10
Example 11
Example 12






















% LTA
73.79
72.74
73.63
72.13
72.03
71.19


% LTC
76.33
75.36
76.13
74.76
74.61
73.85


Dominant Wavelength
488.7
489
488.2
488.8
487.9
488.1


% Excitation Purity
8.2
8.4
8.3
8.6
8.9
9.1


% UltraViolet
60.75
60.62
60.24
60.41
60.02
60.07


Transmittance


% Infrared
18.15
17.02
19.78
16.7
18.48
17.06


Transmittance


% Total Solar Energy
44.14
42.94
45.02
42.55
43.68
42.46


% Fe2O3
0.503
0.503
0.503
0.503
0.503
0.503


% FeO
0.262
0.273
0.247
0.276
0.258
0.272


Redox Ratio
0.521
0.543
0.491
0.549
0.513
0.541


% MnO2
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


ppm Co
2
2
4
4
6
6









Examples 13 through 18 were prepared by the aforementioned procedure, but with an increased total iron oxide content as compared to Examples 7 through 12. The results are reported in Table IV.
















TABLE IV







Example 13
Example 14
Example 15
Example 16
Example 17
Example 18






















% LTA
73
71.87
71.56
72.22
71.37
71.79


% LTC
75.39
74.44
74.1
74.91
73.98
74.44


Dominant Wavelength
489.3
488.6
488.5
488.4
488.1
487.9


% Excitation Purity
7.6
8.5
8.5
9
8.9
9.1


% UltraViolet
56.14
57.4
56.74
58.41
57.03
57.81


Transmittance


% Infrared
19.36
17.26
17.9
16.72
18.17
18.03


Transmittance


% Total Solar Energy
44.22
42.68
42.96
42.62
43.1
43.27


% Fe2O3
0.553
0.553
0.553
0.553
0.553
0.553


% FeO
0.25
0.27
0.264
0.277
0.262
0.263


Redox Ratio
0.452
0.488
0.477
0.501
0.474
0.476


% MnO2
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


ppm Co
2
2
4
4
6
7









Therefore, this invention provides a blue glass that includes a soda-lime-silica base and also includes a colorant portion consisting of iron oxide, manganese oxide and cobalt oxide, and exhibits high infrared absorption and enhanced blue coloration.


While this invention has been described in terms of certain embodiments thereof, it is not intended to be so limited, but rather only to the extent set forth in the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A blue glass composition for automotive glazing comprising a soda-lime-silica base and a colorant portion, said colorant portion, consisting essentially of: 0.4 to 0.65 weight percent total iron oxide in the form of Fe2O3,greater than about 0.1 to about 0.3 weight percent manganese oxide,cobalt oxide in an amount to produce a cobalt concentration of about 0.0002 to 0.0013 weight percent,wherein the redox ratio is between about 0.43 and 0.58,said blue glass composition being characterized by between about 68 to 76 percent illuminant A transmittance, about 54 to 64 percent ultraviolet transmittance, about 12 to 22 percent infrared transmittance, a dominant wavelength between about 486 and 490 nanometers, and a purity excitation between about 7 and 11 percent, as determined at 4.0 mm thickness.
  • 2. The blue glass composition of claim 1 wherein the base comprises: about 68 to 75 weight percent SiO2,about 10 to 18 weight percent Na2O,about 5 to 15 weight percent CaO,0 to about 10 weight percent MgO,0 to about 5 weight percent Al2O3; and0 to about 5 weight percent K2O.
  • 3. The blue glass composition of claim 1 wherein the base is characterized by a total of Na2O and K2O between about 10 and 20 weight percent.
  • 4. The blue glass composition of claim 1 wherein the dominant wavelength is between about 488 and 489 nanometers.
  • 5. The blue glass composition of claim 1 wherein the total amount of iron oxide is between about 0.45 and 0.55 weight percent.
  • 6. The blue glass composition of claim 1 wherein the manganese oxide is between about 0.14 and 0.2 weight percent.
  • 7. The blue glass composition of claim 1 wherein the cobalt concentration due to cobalt oxide is between about 0.0003 and 0.0010 weight percent.
  • 8. A blue glass composition for automotive or architectural glazing comprising a soda-lime-silica base and a colorant portion, said colorant portion consisting essentially of: 0.4 to 0.65 weight percent total iron oxide in the form of Fe2O3,greater than about 0.1 to about 0.3 weight percent manganese oxide,cobalt oxide in an amount to produce a cobalt concentrat on of about 0.0002 to 0.0013 weight percent,wherein the redox ratio is between about 0.43 and 0.58,said blue glass composition being characterized by between about 68 to 76 percent illuminant A transmittance, about 54 to 64 percent ultraviolet transmittance, about 12 to 22 percent infrared transmittance, a dominant wavelength between about 486 and 490 nanometers, and a purity excitation between about 7 and 11 percent, as determined at 4.0 mm thickness.
  • 9. The blue glass composition of claim 1 wherein the blue glass contains between about 0.03 and 0.12 weight percent SO3.
  • 10. The blue glass composition of claim 1 wherein the blue glass contains between about 0.05 and 0.08 weight percent SO3.
US Referenced Citations (91)
Number Name Date Kind
1961603 Berger Jun 1934 A
2505001 Nordberg Apr 1950 A
3343935 Keefer et al. Sep 1967 A
3345190 Albinak Oct 1967 A
3486874 Rough Dec 1969 A
3498806 Hammer et al. Mar 1970 A
3578430 Labrot May 1971 A
3652303 Rao Mar 1972 A
3779733 Janakirama-Rao Dec 1973 A
3951635 Rough, Sr. Apr 1976 A
3971646 Rhodes Jul 1976 A
4104076 Pons Aug 1978 A
4381934 Kunkle et al. May 1983 A
4493557 Nayak et al. Jan 1985 A
4519814 Demarest, Jr. May 1985 A
4529428 Groetzinger Jul 1985 A
4539034 Hanneken Sep 1985 A
4610711 Matesa et al. Sep 1986 A
4701425 Baker et al. Oct 1987 A
4738938 Kunkle et al. Apr 1988 A
4792536 Pecoraro et al. Dec 1988 A
4866010 Boulos et al. Sep 1989 A
5013487 Cheng May 1991 A
5077133 Cheng Dec 1991 A
5112778 Cheng et al. May 1992 A
5214008 Beckwith et al. May 1993 A
5240886 Gulotta et al. Aug 1993 A
5308805 Baker et al. May 1994 A
RE34639 Boulos et al. Jun 1994 E
5318931 Nakaguchi et al. Jun 1994 A
5320986 Taniguchi et al. Jun 1994 A
5344798 Morimoto et al. Sep 1994 A
5346867 Jones et al. Sep 1994 A
RE34760 Boulos et al. Oct 1994 E
5352640 Combes et al. Oct 1994 A
5362689 Morimoto et al. Nov 1994 A
5385872 Gulotta et al. Jan 1995 A
5393593 Gulotta et al. Feb 1995 A
5411922 Jones May 1995 A
5478783 Higby et al. Dec 1995 A
5521128 Jones et al. May 1996 A
5523263 Penrod Jun 1996 A
5558942 Itoh et al. Sep 1996 A
5582455 Casariego et al. Dec 1996 A
5593929 Krumwiede et al. Jan 1997 A
5610107 Danielson et al. Mar 1997 A
5641716 Higby et al. Jun 1997 A
5688727 Shelestak et al. Nov 1997 A
5700579 Jeanvoine et al. Dec 1997 A
5723390 Kijima et al. Mar 1998 A
5725628 Boulos et al. Mar 1998 A
5726109 Ito et al. Mar 1998 A
5747398 Higby et al. May 1998 A
5776845 Boulos et al. Jul 1998 A
5776846 Sakaguchi et al. Jul 1998 A
5780372 Higby Jul 1998 A
5807417 Boulos et al. Sep 1998 A
5830812 Shelestak et al. Nov 1998 A
5830814 Combes Nov 1998 A
5851940 Boulos et al. Dec 1998 A
5858894 Nagashima et al. Jan 1999 A
5877102 DuPont et al. Mar 1999 A
5877103 Dupont et al. Mar 1999 A
5888917 Kawaguchi et al. Mar 1999 A
5897956 Kijima et al. Apr 1999 A
5908794 Maeda et al. Jun 1999 A
5932502 Longobardo et al. Aug 1999 A
5952255 Seto et al. Sep 1999 A
5977002 Boulos et al. Nov 1999 A
5985780 Alvarez Casariego et al. Nov 1999 A
6017837 Nagashima et al. Jan 2000 A
6046122 Nagashima et al. Apr 2000 A
6071840 Sasage et al. Jun 2000 A
6103650 Krumwiede Aug 2000 A
6150028 Mazon Nov 2000 A
6218323 Bretschneider et al. Apr 2001 B1
RE37328 Pecoraro et al. Aug 2001 E
6313052 Nakashima et al. Nov 2001 B1
6313053 Shelestak Nov 2001 B1
6408650 Boulos et al. Jun 2002 B1
6548434 Nagashima Apr 2003 B2
6596660 Boulos et al. Jul 2003 B1
20010018393 Nagashima et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010021685 Sakaguchi et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010034295 Seto et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020025899 Higby et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020058579 Seto et al. May 2002 A1
20020068678 Seto et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020155939 Seto et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169064 Nagashima Nov 2002 A1
20020198094 Arbab et al. Dec 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
0490494 Jun 1992 EP
WO9516641 Jun 1995 EP
0527487 Nov 1996 EP
0820964 Jan 1998 EP
WO9902461 Jan 1999 EP
WO9902462 Jan 1999 EP
1023245 Apr 1999 EP
0996598 Apr 2001 EP
1132350 Sep 2001 EP
WO0198221 Dec 2001 EP
2162835 Feb 1986 GB
2381269 Apr 2003 GB
60-215546 Oct 1985 JP
61-136936 Jun 1986 JP
361219740 Sep 1986 JP
408259256 Oct 1996 JP
410101367 Apr 1998 JP
WO9920577 Apr 1999 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050014627 A1 Jan 2005 US