This application relates to integrated voltage controlled oscillators (VCO). The application further relates to infrastructure-grade integrated VCOs.
Demand for a highly-integrated transceiver solution has increased greatly in the wireless infrastructure market in response to improvements in technology performance. Historically, infrastructure transceivers employed lower levels of on-chip integration than handset transceivers in order to achieve the higher performance requirements of infrastructure systems. One of the main limiting components preventing on-chip integration is the Local Oscillator (LO) source, which is typically a Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO). The phase noise performance of the LO is one of the most critical metrics in an infrastructure transceiver. For many applications, the only possible solution to achieve the required noise specifications is to utilize an off-chip, discrete component VCO or entire Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) module. Despite efforts to develop a fully-integrated infrastructure transceiver, an integrated VCO with overall performance approaching that of high-performance discrete component modules has not yet been achieved.
Accordingly, there is a need to develop an integrated infrastructure VCO in order to reduce the cost and space required to implement an infrastructure transceiver.
Embodiments in the detailed description are related to a differential voltage controlled oscillator (VCO). The voltage controlled oscillator includes a fine-tuning varactor network, a switch capacitor array having a first plurality of binary capacitor array elements and a second plurality of thermometer code capacitor array elements, and a tank inductor network including a first inductor in parallel with a second inductor.
A first exemplary embodiment includes a voltage controlled oscillator having a gain stage and a fine-tuning varactor network coupled in parallel with the gain stage. The fine-tuning varactor network may include a first tuning port output, a second tuning port output and a varactor bias voltage tuning port. The voltage controlled oscillator may further include a switch capacitor array coupled in parallel with the gain stage and the fine tuning-varactor network and a tank inductor network including a first inductor in parallel with a second inductor.
Another exemplary embodiment includes a capacitor array including a capacitor array element. The capacitor array may include an NFET switch coupled to a capacitor to form a first node. The capacitor array may further include a DC pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuit. The DC pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuitry may include a first filter having a first filter input and a first filter output, where the first filter input is coupled to the first node. The DC pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuitry may further include a second filter having a second filter input and a second filter output, a transmission gate coupled to the first filter output, and the second filter input, and a pedestal switch coupled to the second filter output. The transmission gate and the pedestal switch may be configured to be on when the NFET switch is off.
Still another exemplary embodiment includes a differential VCO tuning port comprising a tuning port coupled to a first varactor and a second varactor. In addition, a first tuning capacitor may be coupled between the first varactor and a first tuning port output, wherein a capacitance of the first tuning capacitor is smaller than a capacitance of the first varactor. A second tuning capacitor may be coupled between the second varactor and a second tuning port output, where a capacitance of the second tuning capacitor is smaller than a capacitance of the second varactor.
Another exemplary embodiment includes a segmented switch capacitor array including a first plurality of binary capacitor array elements. Each of the first plurality of binary capacitor array elements has 2N multiples of a unit capacitance and FET switch size. The segmented switch capacitor array further includes a second plurality of thermometer code capacitor array elements, where each of the second plurality of thermometer code capacitor array elements are thermometer code capacitor array elements that have equal capacitances and switch device sizes.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description in association with the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure and illustrate the best mode of practicing the disclosure. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawings, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
Embodiments in the detailed description are related to a differential voltage controlled oscillator (VCO). The voltage controlled oscillator includes a fine-tuning varactor network, a switch capacitor array having a first plurality of binary capacitor array elements and a second plurality of thermometer code capacitor array elements, and a tank inductor network including a first inductor in parallel with a second inductor.
A first exemplary embodiment includes a voltage controlled oscillator having a gain stage and a fine-tuning varactor network coupled in parallel with the gain stage. The fine-tuning varactor network may include a first tuning port output, a second tuning port output and a varactor bias voltage tuning port. The voltage controlled oscillator may further include a switch capacitor array coupled in parallel with the gain stage and the fine tuning-varactor network and a tank inductor network including a first inductor in parallel with a second inductor.
The integrated VCO 10 may be a differential VCO. As an example, some embodiments of the integrated VCO 10 may be a VCO having a Colpitts core. The Colpitts core oscillates at a frequency in which the phase-shift through the feedback is about 180 degrees. The phase-shift around the loop is 360 degrees and the gain around the loop is unity.
As depicted in
Continuing with
The tank inductor network 18 may be coupled to a voltage control oscillator bias voltage (VCOBIAS). The bias voltage provides a DC bias voltage to the cores of the differential inductors, discussed below, in the tank inductor network 18.
The thermometer coded elements 30 include a first thermometer coded element 42, a second thermometer coded element 44, and a third thermometer element 46 corresponding to the bits B5, B6, and B7 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The capacitance of each of the thermometer coded elements 30 is 32 C.
The second 8-bit switch capacitor array 27 is segmented into binary weighted elements 30′ and thermometer coded elements 28′, wherein like numbers have the same characteristic and function. The binary weighted elements 28′ includes a first binary weighted element 32′, a second binary weighted element 34′, a third binary weighted element 36′, a fourth binary weighted element 38′, and a fifth binary weighted element 40′ corresponding to the bits B0, B1, B2, B3, and B4 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The thermometer coded elements 30′ includes a first thermometer coded element 42′, a second thermometer coded element 44′, and a third thermometer element 46′ corresponding to the bits B5, B6, and B7 of the control line from the control logic interface 22.
As further depicted in
The second binary weighted element 34 includes a second field effect (FET) transistor 54 coupled to a second capacitor 56. The second capacitor 54 is coupled to the VCOTANK− signal line. A second direct current (DC) pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuit 58 is coupled across the drain and source of the second FET transistor 54. The gate of the second FET transistor 54 is coupled to bit B1 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The second FET transistor 54 has a drain to source channel width of “2 W,” and is coupled to bit B1 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The second capacitor 50 has a capacitance of 2 C.
The third binary weighted element 36 includes a third field effect (FET) transistor 60 coupled to a third capacitor 62. The third capacitor 62 is coupled to the VCOTANK− signal line. A third direct current (DC) pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuit 64 is coupled across the drain and source of the third FET transistor 60. The gate of the third FET transistor 60 is coupled to bit B2 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The third FET transistor 60 has a drain to source channel width of “4 W,” and is coupled to bit B2 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The third capacitor 62 has a capacitance of 4 C.
The fourth binary weighted element 38 includes a fourth field effect (FET) transistor 66 coupled to a fourth capacitor 68. The fourth capacitor 68 is coupled to the VCOTANK− signal line. A fourth direct current (DC) pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuit 70 is coupled across the drain and source of the fourth FET transistor 66. The gate of the fourth FET transistor 66 is coupled to bit B3 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The fourth FET transistor 66 has a drain to source channel width of “8 W,” and is coupled to bit B3 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The fourth capacitor 62 has a capacitance of 8 C.
The fifth binary weighted element 40 includes a fifth field effect (FET) transistor 72 coupled to a fifth capacitor 74. The fifth capacitor 74 is coupled to the VCOTANK− signal line. A fifth direct current (DC) pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuit 76 is coupled across the drain and source of the fourth FET transistor 66. The gate of the fifth FET transistor 72 is coupled to bit B4 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The fourth FET transistor 72 has a drain to source channel width of “16 W,” and is coupled to bit B4 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The fourth capacitor 74 has a capacitance of 16 C.
The first thermometer coded element 42 includes a sixth field effect (FET) transistor 78 coupled to a sixth capacitor 80. The sixth capacitor 80 is coupled to the VCOTANK− signal line. A sixth direct current (DC) pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuit 82 is coupled across the drain and source of the sixth FET transistor 78. The gate of the sixth FET transistor 78 is coupled to bit B5 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The sixth FET transistor has a drain to source channel width of “32 W.” The sixth capacitor 80 has a capacitance of 32 C.
The second thermometer coded element 44 includes a first field effect (FET) transistor 84 coupled to a seventh capacitor 86. The seventh capacitor 86 is coupled to the VCOTANK− signal line. A seventh direct current (DC) pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuit 88 is coupled across the drain and source of the first FET transistor 84. The gate of the seventh FET transistor 86 is coupled to bit B6 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The seventh FET transistor 86 has a drain to source channel width of “32 W.” The seventh capacitor 40 has a capacitance of 32 C.
The third thermometer coded element 46 includes an eighth field effect (FET) transistor 90 coupled to an eighth capacitor 92. The eighth capacitor 92 is coupled to the VCOTANK− signal line. An eighth direct current (DC) pedestal and voltage swing reduction circuit 94 is coupled across the drain and source of the eighth FET transistor 94. The gate of the eighth FET transistor 90 is coupled to bit B7 of the control line from the control logic interface 22. The eighth FET transistor 90 has a drain to source channel width of “32 W.” The eighth capacitor 92 has a capacitance of 32 C.
As discussed below relative to
The transmission gate 95 lies between a first low pass filter 100 and a second low pass filter 102. The first low pass filter 100 comprises a first filter capacitor 104 and a first filter resistor 106, where the first filter resistor 106 is coupled to the drain of the second FET transistor 54. The second low pass filter 102 comprises a second filter capacitor 108 and a second filter capacitor 110.
In addition, a pedestal circuit 112 provides a DC pedestal voltage when the second FET transistor 54 is turned off. The pedestal circuit 112 includes a voltage divider network composed of a first divider resistor 114 and a second divider resistor 116 coupled to a switch transistor 118. The switch transistor 118 is configured to switch in a voltage divider network when the second FET transistor 54 is turned off. When the switch transistor 118 is in a saturation mode of operating, the DC pedestal voltage at the drain of the switch transistor 118 is equal to VCOTANK− (R4/(R3+R4)). The DC pedestal voltage passes through the first resistor 106, the transmission gate 95, and the second resistor 110 to the drain of the second FET transistor 54, which prevents the drain of the second FET transistor 54 from floating when the second FET transistor 54 is turned off.
A first shunt capacitor 130 is coupled between the first series capacitor 126 and a common voltage or ground. Similarly, a second shunt capacitor 132 is coupled between the second series capacitor 128 and a common voltage or ground. The first shunt capacitor 130 and the second shunt capacitor 132 may be adjusted to set the KV of the fine tuning varactor network 14 at the operating frequency, which is the relationship between frequency change of the integrated VCO 10 to the change in the tuning voltage VTUNE.
A first shunt inductor 134 couples the first series capacitor 126 and the first varactor 122 to ground. A second shunt inductor 136 couples the second series capacitor 128 and the second varactor 124 to ground. The first shunt inductor 130 and second shunt inductor 132 provide a DC bias to the first varactor 122 and the second varactor 124, respectively, and appear as a high impedance at the operating frequency of the fine-tuning varactor network 14. Selecting the capacitance of the first varactor 122 and the second varactor 124 to be substantially larger than the first series capacitor 126 and second series capacitor 128, respectively, improves the linearity of response of the integrated VCO.
As an example, in some embodiments, the first series capacitor 126 and the second series capacitor 128 have a capacitance of between 1 pf to 2 pf. Correspondingly, the first varactor 122 and the second varactor 124 may have a capacitance of between 10 pf to 15 pf. Accordingly, the ratio of fixed series capacitance to a nominal varactor capacitance may range between about 1:8 to 1:14 for different embodiments. Still other embodiments may have a ratio of fixed series capacitance to a nominal varactor capacitance of around 1:10.
Accordingly, during normal operation, the combination of the first varactor 122 and the first series capacitor 126 provide a first variable capacitance in parallel with the first shunt capacitor 130. Likewise, the combination of the second varactor 124 and second series capacitor 128 provides a second variable capacitance in parallel with the second shunt capacitor 132.
The two inductor design permits selection from a family of standard inductors offered by the utilized process, where the family of standard inductors have an optimal range of inductances with respect to Q at the frequencies of interest. As an example, an optimum Q for a family of inductors may occur in the L=1 nH range. However, the optimum tank inductance with respect to oscillation frequency and Ctank/Ltank ratio may be approximately in the L=0.5 nH range. If a single differential inductor was used with L=0.5 nH, rather than two 1 nH inductors in parallel, the Q of the tank inductance may be significantly lower due to the Q vs. frequency characteristics of the inductors. This is because lower inductances have higher peak Q frequencies. For example, the peak Q for a 0.5 nH inductor may be several times over the desired operating frequency, while the peak Q of a 1 nH inductor may occur roughly at the operating frequency. Utilizing two larger parallel inductors allows the use of tank inductors that are operating near their peak Q, while providing the tank inductance that is needed to achieve the required output frequency and tuning characteristics. An added benefit of this approach is the symmetry that is provided by the use of two parallel inductors within the differential structure of the VCO. The added symmetry can lead to improved noise performance due to the increased balance in the circuit. A similar approach may be used to combine inductors in parallel and series to obtain the desired operating characteristics.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/246,869 entitled AN INFRASTRUCTURE-GRADE INTEGRATED VOLTAGE CONTROLLED OSCILLATOR (VCO) WITH LINEAR TUNING CHARACTERISTICS AND LOW PHASE NOISE, filed Sep. 29, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3538450 | Andrea et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
4580107 | Caldwell et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
5084685 | Moller | Jan 1992 | A |
5117206 | Imamura | May 1992 | A |
5446416 | Lin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5493715 | Humphreys et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5631592 | Schwarz et al. | May 1997 | A |
5764112 | Bal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6016080 | Zuta et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6072842 | Janesch et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097768 | Janesch et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6181218 | Clark et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198353 | Janesch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6281758 | Elsayed et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6326851 | Staszewski et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6326961 | Lin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329941 | Farooqi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6414555 | Staszewski et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6429699 | Shi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473021 | Somayajula et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504437 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6563390 | Kizziar | May 2003 | B1 |
6587529 | Staszewski et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606004 | Staszewski et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6650721 | Janesch et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658748 | Leipold et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6693468 | Humphreys et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6710664 | Humphreys et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724265 | Humphreys | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731145 | Humphreys et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6734741 | Muhammad et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6747522 | Pietruszynski | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6791422 | Staszewski et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798301 | Balan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6806786 | Lam et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6838951 | Nieri et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6851493 | Staszewski et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6906596 | Kitamura et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7023282 | Humpreys et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7064591 | Humphreys et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7098754 | Humphreys et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113052 | Dunworth | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7199674 | Ash | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7250826 | Gabara | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7279988 | Janesch et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7385453 | Nervegna | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7449970 | Yu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7750685 | Bunch et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7782151 | Buell | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782152 | Darabi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7902933 | Brennan | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7932784 | Janesch et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8193843 | Stegmeir | Jun 2012 | B1 |
20030197564 | Humphreys et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040183601 | Zhang | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050057290 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050231296 | Souetinov | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070247237 | Mohammadi | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080231375 | Welz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Aparicio, R. et al., “A noise-shifting differential Colpitts VCO,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Dec. 2002, pp. 1728-1736, vol. 37, No. 12, IEEE. |
Kurachi, S. et al., “5-GHz Band Highly Linear VCO IC with a Novel Resonant Circuit,” 2007 Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems, Jan. 10-12, 2007, pp. 285-288, IEEE. |
Hajimiri, Ai. et al., “A General Theory of Phase Noise in Electrical Oscillators,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Feb. 1998, pp. 179-194, vol. 33, No. 2, IEEE. |
Andreani, P. et al, “A Study of Phase Noise in Colpitts and LC-Tank CMOS Oscillators,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, May 2005, pp. 1107-1118, vol. 40, No. 5, IEEE. |
Ham, D. et al, “Concepts and Methods in Optimization of Integrated LC VCOs,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jun. 2001, pp. 896-909, vol. 36, No. 6, IEEE. |
Hajimiri, A. et al, “Low Noise Oscillators,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, pp. 124-127. |
Aktas, A. et al, “CMOS PLLs and VCOs for 4G Wireless,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, pp. 96-97. |
Manetakis, K. et al, “A CMOS VCO with 48% Tuning Range for Modern Broadband Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE 2004 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Oct. 3-6, 2004, pp. 265-268, IEEE. |
Hajimiri, A. et al, “Design Issues in CMOS Differential LC Oscillators,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, May 1999, pp. 717-724, vol. 34, No. 5, IEEE. |
Lee, C.H. et al, “A 0.18um SiGe BiCMOS UHF VCO with Auto Tuning for DCT AMPS and CDMA Application,” Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (RFIC) Symposium, 2004 IEEE Digest of Papers, Jun. 6-8, 2004, pp. 471-474, IEEE. |
Hegazi, E. et al, “A Filtering Technique to Lower LC Oscillator Phase Noise,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Dec. 2001, pp. 1921-1930, vol. 36, No. 12, IEEE. |
Andreani, P. et al., “A 2.3GHz LC-Tank CMOS VCO with Optimal Phase Noise Performance”, International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 6-9, 2006, IEEE, pp. 691-700. |
Kral, A. et al. “RF-CMOS Oscillators with Switched Tuning,” IEEE 1998 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1998, IEEE, pp. 555-558. |
Staszewski, Robert Bogdan et al., “A First Multigigahertz Digitally Controlled Oscillator for Wireless Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 51, No. 11, Nov. 2003, pp. 2154-2164. |
Staszewski, Robert Bogdan et al., “Digitally Controlled Oscillator (DCO)-Based Architecture for RF Frequency Synthesis in a Deep-Submicrometer CMOS Process,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, vol. 50, No. 11, Nov. 2003, IEEE, pp. 815-828. |
Steinkamp, J. et al., “A Colpitts Oscillator Design for a GSM Base Station Synthesizer,” Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2007, IEEE, pp. 405-408. |
Wilson, William B. et al. “A CMOS Self-Calibrating Frequency Synthesizer,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 10, Oct. 2000, IEEE, pp. 1437-1444. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/082,277, mailed Nov. 3, 2006, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/082,277, mailed Apr. 13, 2007, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/082,277, mailed May 31, 2007, 4 pages. |
Mon-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/854,917, mailed Mar. 24, 2010, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/854,917, mailed Sep. 10, 2010, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,757, mailed Mar. 29, 2010, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61246869 | Sep 2009 | US |