This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. §371 from PCT Application No. PCT/GB2005/001538, filed Apr. 21, 2005, which claims the priority benefit of Great Britain Application No. 0408817.5, filed Apr. 21, 2004, Great Britain Application No. 0424400.0, filed Nov. 4, 2004, and Great Britain Application No. 0426910.6, filed Dec. 8, 2004.
This invention relates to a dry powder inhaler, that is to say a device for the administration of powdered medicament by inhalation, and in particular to such an inhaler having a certain form of airway that functions as an aerosolisation device, as well as to methods of treatment related thereto.
The administration of medicaments by inhalation is well-known. A wide variety of medicaments are now administered by that route, for the treatment of a wide variety of respiratory disorders.
Examples of medicaments used for the treatment of respiratory disorders include, among others, anti-allergic agents, eg cromoglycate, ketotifen and nedocromil; anti-inflammatory steroids, eg beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone, budesonide, flunisolide, ciclesonide, triamcinolone acetonide and mometasone furoate; bronchodilators such as β2-agonists, eg fenoterol, formoterol, pirbuterol, reproterol, salbutamol, salmeterol and terbutaline, non-selective β-stimulants, eg isoprenaline, and xanthine bronchodilators, eg theophylline, aminophylline and choline theophyllinate; and anticholinergic agents, eg ipratropium bromide, oxitropium bromide and tiotropium.
The most common form in which such medicaments are formulated for administration by inhalation is as a powder. In the past, many such compositions were formulated as pressurised aerosols, in which the powder medicament was suspended in a liquefied propellant. Due to the adverse environmental effects of the propellants conventionally used, however, there is now increased interest in the use of so-called dry powder inhalers (DPIs). In a DPI, a unit dose of medicament powder, either packaged as such or metered from a bulk reservoir of medicament, is presented to an airway and is then entrained in an airflow passing through the airway. The airflow is most commonly generated by the patient's act of inhalation.
For the effective treatment of conditions of the respiratory tract it is generally desirable that as high a proportion of the powder as possible should be in the form of particles that are sufficiently fine that they are able to penetrate deep into the airways, and in particular that they should be transported deep into the lung. An important parameter in assessing the effectiveness of powdered medicament intended for inhalation is therefore the fine particle fraction (FPF), which defines the fraction of the emitted dose from an inhaler that has the potential to be deposited in the lung. This fraction is often defined as the proportion of the medicament that is in the form of particles with a diameter of less than 5 μm.
The FPF will depend to some extent on the manner in which the medicament is formulated, but also is strongly dependent on the performance of the device (inhaler) from which the formulation is delivered.
In optimising the performance of a DPI, a number of conflicting considerations must be addressed. It is generally desirable to create a turbulent airflow, in order to deagglomerate medicament particles that would otherwise adhere to each other in aggregates that are too large to penetrate deep into the lung. In order to achieve this, relatively high flow rates are required. However, the rate of flow of the air and entrained medicament that enters the patient's buccal cavity should not be excessively high, as that can cause the medicament particles simply to be deposited on the surfaces of the oropharynx and hence not to reach the intended site of action.
Numerous attempts have been made to improve the FPF of inhalers, especially DPIs.
For instance, it is well known that agglomeration of medicament particles can cause the FPF to decrease. Therefore, there is a clear incentive to reduce agglomerations. US-A-2004/0035412 describes a mouthpiece for use in an inhaler, the mouthpiece being provided with a number of abutments which extend across the mouthpiece.
The abutments are arranged in a staggered configuration and are intended to cause medicament agglomerations to break up.
Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,681,768 describes a deagglomeration system for an inhaler, which comprises a mouthpiece provided with a plurality of circumferential fins that act as deagglomeration means.
Combination therapy using two different medicaments has in recent years become an increasingly widely accepted method for the treatment of asthma. A number of combination products are now marketed, typically incorporating a long-acting β2-agonist and a corticosteroid drug in the same inhaler. DPI products of this type have focussed on combined drug formulations, ie single formulations containing both active ingredients. An alternative approach is to use a device such as that disclosed in WO-A-01/39823. In such a device, separate reservoirs are provided for the two active ingredients and these are delivered via separate airways. This approach offers certain advantages, but presents particular challenges in terms of airway performance. The main reason for this is that only one-half of the overall airflow is available for aerosolisation of each of the two medicaments, and the kinetic energy of the air stream will also be significantly reduced compared to a single airway of similar geometry. Optimisation of airway design is therefore particularly important for such a device.
There has now been devised an improved form of dry powder inhaler that offers improved performance relative to the prior art, and which is particularly useful for the delivery of combinations of different medicaments.
Thus, according to the invention there is provided a dry powder inhaler comprising an airway along which, in use, air is drawn from an upstream, inlet end to a downstream, outlet end, the airway including a medicament presentation region at which, in use, a dose of medicament is presented to the airway, a primary air inlet, and a barrel extending from the medicament presentation region to the outlet end of the airway, wherein
The dry powder inhaler according to the invention is advantageous primarily in that medicament entrained at the medicament presentation region is delivered to the user of the inhaler with a high fine particle fraction. This is believed to be due to the generation of a turbulent airflow at the medicament presentation region and a relatively high airflow in that region. The form of the barrel nonetheless leads to a deceleration of the airflow downstream of the medicament presentation region, which reduces deposition of the entrained medicament in the oropharynx. In particular, the reduced dimension of the inlet end of the barrel, constituting a constriction in the airway adjacent to the medicament presentation region, means that the powder flow may be subject to increased initial acceleration whilst maximising dispersion of the medicament, yet allowing deceleration of unagglomerated particles. These benefits are particularly advantageous in DPI devices for the administration of two different medicaments dispensed via separate airways.
Preferably, the medicament presentation region of the airway comprises a substantially enclosed chamber, the walls of which carry the primary and secondary air inlets.
Medicament is preferably presented to the airway by virtue of being delivered to a recess or opening in a wall of the chamber. The nature of the mechanism by which a dose of medicament is delivered to the chamber is not critical to the present invention. Examples of such mechanisms are those disclosed in WO-A-92/00771, WO-A-93/16748 and WO-A-01/39823.
The primary air inlet most preferably has the form of a slot in a wall of the chamber. The slot is preferably disposed transverse to the longitudinal axis of the barrel, and is preferably formed in the wall of the chamber that is opposite to that to which the dose of medicament is presented, such that air is drawn into the chamber with a component of its motion that is directed towards the wall of the chamber at which the medicament is presented. This may assist in the pick-up and entrainment of the medicament.
The secondary air inlet also most preferably has the form of a slot. The secondary air inlet is preferably provided in a wall of the chamber that is orthogonal to the wall at which the medicament is presented.
The flows of air into the chamber from the primary and secondary air inlets are thus preferably orthogonal to each other.
Preferably, the diameter of the barrel increases gradually from the inlet end to the outlet end of the barrel. Thus, the barrel will have a generally frustoconical internal bore.
The internal diameter of the barrel may vary. We have particularly found it to be advantageous that the outlet end should have an internal diameter of 8 mm or less. However, if the air inlet end of the barrel has an internal diameter of from 2 mm to 4 mm, then the outlet end of the barrel will have an internal diameter of from 4 mm to 8 mm.
Deagglomeration of entrained medicament may be further facilitated by the provision on the internal walls of the barrel of grooves or fins. In one such embodiment of the invention, one or more fins protrude from the inner walls of the barrel. Preferably, the barrel is provided with a plurality of fins. The fins may be of substantially the same depth along the whole of their length. However, more preferably, the fins reduce in depth from the inlet end of the barrel to the outlet end.
Optionally, the fins may extend along the full length of the barrel. Alternatively, and preferably, the fins extend along only part of the length of the barrel and terminate before the outlet end of the barrel.
The fins may be substantially linear and may extend substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the barrel. Alternatively, the fins may be adapted to impart some degree of rotary motion to the airflow passing along the barrel. Thus, the fins may be wholly or partly helical in form. The barrel may be provided with a combination of axial and helical fins.
The fins may be substantially continuous or may be interrupted. A combination of continuous and/or interrupted fins may be provided.
When the fins are helical, the angle subtended by the helix within the barrel may vary. Preferably, the fins subtend an angle of from 90° to 270°, preferably from 135° to 225° and most preferably about 180°.
The number of fins may also vary. Thus, there may be from 1 to 5 fins, preferably from 2 to 4 and especially 2 or 3 fins.
When a plurality of fins are provided they may or may not be spaced equiangularly apart. However, it is preferred that the fins are equiangularly spaced.
Optimisation of performance may be achieved by appropriate control of the proportions of the overall airflow that enter the medicament presentation region via the primary and secondary air inlets. These proportions may be controlled most easily by appropriate selection of the cross-sectional areas of the various inlets. The ratio of the areas of the primary and secondary air inlets may be important for, inter alia, optimising pickup and entrainment of medicament from the medicament presentation region, the generation of turbulence and/or improving deagglomeration of medicament particles.
Preferably, the ratio of the cross-sectional areas of the primary and secondary air inlets is between 10:1 and 1:1, more preferably between 5:1 and 2:1, eg about 3:1.
The cross-sectional area of the primary air inlet is preferably greater than 2 mm2, more preferably greater than 4 mm2, and is preferably less than 10 mm2, and more preferably less than 8 mm2.
The cross-sectional area of the secondary air inlet is preferably greater than 0.5 mm2, more preferably greater than 1 mm2, and is preferably less than 5 mm2, and more preferably less than 3 mm2.
Generally, the outlet end of the airway will form part of, or will be enclosed within, a mouthpiece that, in use, is placed between the user's lips and via which the medicament is inhaled.
In some prior art devices, such as those sold under the trade marks Diskhaler®, Diskus® and Accuhaler® (available from GlaxoSmithKline), two symmetrical air bleeds are provided in the outlet section of the airway. However, in, for example, the Diskhaler® the positions of those air bleeds are so close to the airway outlet that they may potentially be covered by the patient's mouth when in use. Thus, in the present invention it is preferred that the air inlets are positioned such that, in normal use, they cannot be occluded by the user's lips, or indeed by any other part of the user's anatomy, eg the fingers of the hand in which the device is held by the user.
The inhaler of the invention may comprise any conventionally known dosage units, eg single dosage units or, preferably, a bulk reservoir.
A variety of medicaments may be administered by using the inhaler of the invention. Such medicaments are generally suitable for the treatment of asthma, COPD and respiratory infections. Such medicaments include, but are not limited to β2-agonists, eg fenoterol, formoterol, pirbuterol, reproterol, rimiterol, salbutamol, salmeterol and terbutaline; non-selective beta-stimulants such as isoprenaline; xanthine bronchodilators, eg theophylline, aminophylline and choline theophyllinate; anticholinergics, eg ipratropium bromide, oxitropium and tiotropium; mast cell stabilisers, eg sodium cromoglycate and ketotifen; bronchial anti-inflammatory agents, eg nedocromil sodium; and steroids, eg beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone, budesonide, flunisolide, triamcinolone, mometasone and ciclesonide, and salts or derivatives thereof.
As mentioned above, the inhaler of the present invention is particularly well suited to the delivery of combinations of separately formulated medicaments. It is particularly preferred that such medicaments be delivered via separate airways. Thus, in a specific aspect of the invention, there is provided a dry powder inhaler comprising a plurality of separate airways along which, in use, air is drawn from an upstream, inlet end to a downstream, outlet end, each airway including a medicament presentation region at which, in use, a dose of medicament is presented to the airway, a primary air inlet, and a barrel extending from the medicament presentation region to the outlet end of the airway, wherein
Specific combinations of medicaments which may be mentioned include combinations of steroids and β2-agonists. Examples of such combinations are beclomethasone and formoterol; beclomethasone and salmeterol; fluticasone and formoterol; fluticasone and salmeterol; budesonide and formoterol; budesonide and salmeterol; flunisolide and formoterol; flunisolide and salmeterol; ciclesonide and salmeterol; ciclesonide and formoterol; mometasone and salmeterol; and mometasone and formoterol.
Further medicaments which may be mentioned include systemically active materials, such as, proteinaceous compounds and/or macromolecules, for example, hormones and mediators, such as insulin, human growth hormone, leuprolide and alpha-interferon; growth factors, anticoagulants, immunomodulators, cytokines and nucleic acids.
According to a further aspect of the invention we provide a method of delivering a powder which comprises the use of a dry powder inhaler as hereinbefore described.
We further provide a method of treatment of a patient with a respiratory disorder which comprises the administration of at least one medicament using a dry powder inhaler as hereinbefore described.
We also provide a method of treatment of a patient with a systemic disorder which comprises the administration of a medicament using a dry powder inhaler of the invention.
The invention will now be described in greater detail, by way of illustration only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
Referring first to
The inlet end 2 of the airway 1 is formed such that when it is brought into conjunction with other components of the inhaler, specifically with a metering device of the inhaler, as described more fully below, a substantially enclosed chamber is formed within which a unit dose of medicament is presented for inhalation. Thus, the inlet end 2 of the airway 1, which is of enlarged dimensions relative to the remainder of the airway 1, constitutes a medicament presentation region 4 of the airway.
A barrel 5 extends from the medicament presentation region 4 to the outlet end 3 of the airway 1. The barrel 5 increases gradually in diameter, the internal diameter of the barrel 5 at the outlet end 3 being approximately 50% greater than that at the inlet end of the barrel 5.
The medicament presentation region 4 is provided with a primary air inlet 10 and a secondary air inlet 11.
Referring to
The frustoconical surface of the wheel 26 is formed with a series of measuring cups 30, and the wheel shroud 28 is formed with an opening 32 of slightly greater dimensions than the measuring cups 30.
The arrangement is such that the wheel 26 is capable of indexed rotation in one direction only within the wheel shroud 28. Twelve measuring cups 30 are formed in the wheel 30, and those cups 30 are equiangularly spaced. The angular separation of the cups 30 is thus 30°, and each indexed rotation of the wheel 30 rotates the wheel by 30°, thus bringing each measuring cup 30 into the position previously (ie before the indexed rotation) occupied by an adjacent cup 30.
At any given time, one of the measuring cups 30 is located beneath the open lower end of the reservoir 22. That cup 30 therefore fills with powdered medicament under the influence of gravity (see
The opening 32 in the wheel shroud 28 is positioned with an angular separation from the central axis of the reservoir 22 of 60°. Thus, two indexed rotations of the wheel 26 brings a measuring cup 30, filled with a unit dose of the medicament, into registration with the opening 32. The dose of medicament may be flushed out of the measuring cup 30 by an airflow passing across the opening 32. To achieve this, the airway 1 is fitted to the wheel shroud 28, as indicated by the broken lines in
The medicament presentation region 4 and the external surface of the wheel shroud 28 over which it is fitted thus form a substantially enclosed chamber.
The outlet end of the barrel 5 of the airway 1 constitutes, or is positioned within, a mouthpiece that, in use, is placed between the user's lips. Inhalation by the user causes air to be drawn into the airway through the primary air inlet 10 and secondary air inlet 11. That flow of air causes the dose of medicament to be flushed from the measuring cup 30 located at the opening 32 and to be entrained in the airflow. The flow of air into the medicament presentation region from two different air inlets, viz the primary air inlet 10 and the secondary air inlet 11, that are disposed substantially orthogonally to each other, increases the degree of turbulence in the airflow, improving deagglomeration, entrainment and aerosolisation of the powdered medicament.
The inlet end of the barrel 5, being of reduced dimension relative to the internal dimensions of the medicament presentation region 4 constitutes a restriction in the airway. The effect of this constriction is to cause air passing through the constriction to accelerate, thereby further enhancing deagglomeration of the entrained medicament. However, the widening of the barrel 5 downstream of the constriction causes the airflow to slow down. The airflow therefore exits the barrel 5 at reduced velocity, thereby reducing the tendency for the medicament to deposit in the user's throat and upper airway, and increasing the proportion of the medicament that penetrates deep into the lower airway.
As shown in
Referring now to
The mode of operation of the metering mechanisms is illustrated in
The dual airway 42 is shown most clearly in
In use, inhalation by the user causes air to be drawn into the two chambers 43 via the respective primary and secondary air inlets 44,45 (indicated by the arrows A and B in
The performance of the second embodiment of the invention was investigated in the following way:
Methods
Two pharmaceutical testing methods were employed to examine the pharmaceutical performance of the airway design. A twin stage impinger (TSI)-based powder mimic test was used for rapid screening studies in the early development stages of various air inlets and airway types. According to TSI findings, initial selections were then made for further Andersen cascade impactor (ACI) testing utilising drug-containing development blends to determine the fine particle dose and fraction (FPD and FPF).
For TSI testing, blended microparticles of mannitol 15% (w/w) (containing 1% methylene blue w/w) and lactose 85% (w/w) were used. For the ACI tests, two drug powders were used, viz a steroid drug blend and a bronchodilator drug blend. The metering chambers used for these studies employed dose metering element (measuring cup) volumes of 7 mm3 and 14 mm3.
Results
Metered Dose Weight and Delivered Dose
TSI drug mimic tests with two devices and five actuations (ten determinations) at each of three flow rates were carried out.
The ACI results for an inhaled steroid drug blend showed mean (relative standard deviation) actuation weights of 5.3 mg (5.8%) and 10.1 mg (4.8%) for the low- and high-dose product variants, respectively. The bronchodilator blend yielded a mean metered dose weight of 5.7 mg (4.8%).
Particle Size Distribution (FPD and FPF)
ACI analyses demonstrated the device deagglomeration performance, with the cut-off fine particle diameter at a flow rate of 60 l/min defined as 5 μm. The average FPF for the steroid blend was 38.5% for the 7 mm3 dose metering element, and 33.5% for the 14 mm3 dose metering elements. For the bronchodilator blend the average FPF was 42.3%.
In a further experiment, the airway performance was evaluated at pressure drops across the device of 2, 4 and 6 kPa. Table 1 shows the data for the most challenging blend with highest metered mass, and again shows that the airway performance is substantially independent of flow rate.
The airway was found to generate turbulent airflow at a low flow rate (<30 l/min). At pressure drops of 2, 4 and 6 kPa across the device and at a relatively low flow rate, the airway was able to generate efficient and flow-independent pharmaceutical performance.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0408817.5 | Apr 2004 | GB | national |
0424400.0 | Nov 2004 | GB | national |
0426910.6 | Dec 2004 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2005/001538 | 4/21/2005 | WO | 00 | 10/19/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/102429 | 11/3/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1858735 | Goodsell | May 1932 | A |
2587215 | Priestly | Feb 1952 | A |
3008609 | Sessions | Nov 1961 | A |
3439823 | Morane | Apr 1969 | A |
3798054 | Kawata et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3854626 | Krechmar | Dec 1974 | A |
3874381 | Baum | Apr 1975 | A |
3876269 | Fisher et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4047635 | Bennett, Jr. | Sep 1977 | A |
4114615 | Wetterlin | Sep 1978 | A |
4174034 | Hoo | Nov 1979 | A |
4200099 | Guenzel et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4274403 | Struve | Jun 1981 | A |
4524769 | Wetterlin | Jun 1985 | A |
4534343 | Nowacki et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4570630 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4604847 | Moulding, Jr. et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4624442 | Duffy et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4627432 | Newell et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4635829 | Brittingham, Jr. | Jan 1987 | A |
4668218 | Virtanen | May 1987 | A |
4811731 | Newell et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4860740 | Kirk et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4882210 | Romberg et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4895719 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4907583 | Wetterlin et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4934358 | Nilsson et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4950365 | Evans | Aug 1990 | A |
5002048 | Makiej, Jr. | Mar 1991 | A |
5007419 | Weinstein et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5042472 | Bunin | Aug 1991 | A |
5053237 | Hendricks et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064083 | Alexander et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5067491 | Taylor, II et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5113855 | Newhouse | May 1992 | A |
5152422 | Springer | Oct 1992 | A |
5154326 | Chang et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5161524 | Evans | Nov 1992 | A |
5169029 | Behar et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192528 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5207217 | Cocozza et al. | May 1993 | A |
5208226 | Palmer | May 1993 | A |
5253782 | Gates et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263475 | Altermatt et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5295479 | Lankinen | Mar 1994 | A |
5301666 | Lerk et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5347999 | Poss et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351683 | Chiesi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5394868 | Ambrosio et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409132 | Kooijmans et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411175 | Armstrong et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415162 | Casper et al. | May 1995 | A |
5435301 | Herold et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437267 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5437270 | Braithwaite | Aug 1995 | A |
5447151 | Bruna et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450160 | Tianello et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458135 | Patton et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5485939 | Tucker | Jan 1996 | A |
5503144 | Bacon | Apr 1996 | A |
5520166 | Ritson et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524613 | Haber et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5551597 | Lambelet, Jr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562231 | Lambelet, Jr. et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562918 | Stimpson | Oct 1996 | A |
5575280 | Gupte et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5617845 | Poss et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622166 | Eisele et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5653227 | Barnes et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657748 | Braithwaite | Aug 1997 | A |
5657794 | Briner et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664557 | Makiej, Jr. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664697 | Lambelet, Jr. et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676130 | Gupte et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678538 | Drought | Oct 1997 | A |
D389570 | Savolainen | Jan 1998 | S |
5740792 | Ashley et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740794 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5775536 | Lambelet, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778873 | Braithwaite | Jul 1998 | A |
5785049 | Smith et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5799821 | Lambelet, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857457 | Hyppölä | Jan 1999 | A |
5875776 | Vaghefi | Mar 1999 | A |
5881719 | Gottenauer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896855 | Hobbs et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904139 | Hauser | May 1999 | A |
5906198 | Flickinger | May 1999 | A |
5921237 | Eisele et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924417 | Braithwaite | Jul 1999 | A |
5941241 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944660 | Kimball et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955439 | Green | Sep 1999 | A |
5981549 | Viner | Nov 1999 | A |
5996577 | Ohki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006747 | Eisele et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6035463 | Pawelzik et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065471 | Schaeffer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065472 | Anderson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076521 | Lindahl et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6089227 | Nilsson | Jul 2000 | A |
6116238 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6116239 | Volgyesi | Sep 2000 | A |
6119688 | Whaley et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125844 | Samiotes | Oct 2000 | A |
6138668 | Patton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6158675 | Ogi | Dec 2000 | A |
6196218 | Voges | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220243 | Schaeffer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230707 | Horlin | May 2001 | B1 |
6234167 | Cox et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240918 | Ambrosio et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254854 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273085 | Eisele et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6321747 | Dmitrovic et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324428 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325241 | Garde et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328034 | Eisele et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347629 | Braithwaite | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6418926 | Chawla | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443146 | Voges | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484718 | Schaeffer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6523536 | Fugelsang et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6543443 | Klimowicz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553987 | Davies | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557550 | Clarke | May 2003 | B1 |
6557552 | Cox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6601729 | Papp | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616914 | Ward et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6675839 | Braithwaite | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6698425 | Widerström | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6810873 | Haikarainen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6810874 | Koskela et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6845772 | Braithwaite et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6926003 | Seppälä | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7143765 | Asking et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7278982 | Tsutsui | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20020092523 | Connelly et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030075172 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030116157 | Braithwaite et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030136406 | Seppala | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040011357 | Braithwaite | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035412 | Staniforth et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040101482 | Sanders | May 2004 | A1 |
20040236282 | Braithwaite | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251318 | Braithwaite | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050121023 | Braithwaite | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2195065 | Feb 2002 | CA |
2239292 | Sep 2003 | CA |
14 98 398 | Jan 1969 | DE |
23 46 730 | Apr 1975 | DE |
32 43 731 | May 1984 | DE |
195 30 240 | Feb 1997 | DE |
197 57 207 | Jun 1999 | DE |
0 045 522 | Feb 1982 | EP |
0 079 478 | May 1983 | EP |
0 166 294 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0 372 777 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0 424 790 | May 1991 | EP |
0 448 204 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 469 814 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0 514 085 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 520 440 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0 539 469 | May 1993 | EP |
0 548 605 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0 573 128 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 626 689 BI | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 659 432 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 663 815 | Jul 1995 | EP |
1 062 962 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 106 196 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 208 863 | May 2002 | EP |
1291032 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1452198 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2 516 387 | May 1983 | FR |
2 584 604 | Jan 1987 | FR |
2 662 936 | Dec 1991 | FR |
2 753 791 | Mar 1998 | FR |
3908 | Jan 1911 | GB |
1 242 211 | Aug 1971 | GB |
1 573 551 | Aug 1980 | GB |
2 041 763 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2 165 159 | Apr 1986 | GB |
2 178 965 | Feb 1987 | GB |
2 235 753 | Mar 1991 | GB |
2 248 400 | Apr 1992 | GB |
2 366 208 | Mar 2002 | GB |
2002165884 | Jun 2002 | JP |
WO 9007351 | Jul 1990 | WO |
WO 9104011 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9111173 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9111495 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9114422 | Oct 1991 | WO |
WO 9200771 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9203175 | Mar 1992 | WO |
WO 9204928 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9209322 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9218188 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9300951 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9311746 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9316748 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9500128 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9515777 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9517917 | Jul 1995 | WO |
9602231 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9608284 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9700399 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9720589 | Jun 1997 | WO |
9740819 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9826828 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9828033 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9830262 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9831352 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9912597 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9913930 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9926676 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0012163 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0045878 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0064519 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0117595 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0128887 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0139823 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0151030 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0160341 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0187391 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0187378 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0197889 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0200280 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0200281 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02056948 | Jul 2002 | WO |
2004017914 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004017918 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004017942 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004026380 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004091705 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004091705 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gerrity, T.R., “Pathophysiological and Disease Constraints on Aerosol Delivery,” Chapter 1, Respiratory Drug Delivery I, ed. Byron, P.R., CRC Press, pp. 1-38 (1990). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070246044 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |