Some applications of the present invention relate in general to medical devices. More specifically, some applications of the present invention relate to percutaneous implants.
Neurological disorders affect the nerves, muscles or the brain. Many neurological disorders reduce or eliminate voluntary recruitment of muscles, which may result in loss of ability to perform motor tasks or to maintain systems that depend on muscle activity for their function. Many neurological disorders cause pain.
Neurostimulation is a clinical tool used to treat various neurological disorders. This technique involves modulation of the nervous system by electrically activating fibers in the body. Percutaneous implants exist for providing neurostimulation.
Some applications of the invention relate to the inhibition of migration of implants, i.e., undesired movement of implants subsequent to their implantation in tissue of a subject. The implants are typically electrostimulator implants comprising an implant body and at least two electrodes disposed on the implant body.
For some applications, migration of the implant is inhibited by providing a mesh disposed over at least part of the implant body. The mesh comprises a plurality of strands, which may comprise a metal, a polymer, a fiber, or another material. For example, the mesh may be a metallic mesh, a polymer mesh, and/or a fabric. For some applications, the mesh is braided. For some applications, the mesh is disposed over an expanding frame, which itself may be a mesh. For some applications, the frame is provided without the mesh. The mesh and/or the frame serves to inhibit migration of the implant, thereby serving as an anchor.
For some applications, a mesh and/or a frame are provided at an end of the implant, rather than being disposed over the implant body.
For some applications, migration of the implant is inhibited by providing a silicone anchoring material disposed over at least part of the implant body. For some such applications, the silicone anchoring material is shaped to define synthetic setae.
For some applications, migration of the implant is inhibited by providing a flexible tail, coupled to the implant body, and typically defining a plurality of nodules and/or a plurality of notches distributed therealong.
For some applications, a system is provided whereby a delivery tool that delivers the implant also delivers an adhesive to the implantation site.
There is therefore provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:
an electrostimulator implant, including:
In an application, the mesh includes a tissue-growth scaffold.
In an application, the mesh is disposed over a third portion of the implant body, the third portion being longitudinally between the first and second portions.
In an application, the mesh is disposed over at least 70 percent of the outer surface of the implant.
In an application, the mesh is disposed over less than 90 percent of the outer surface of the implant.
In an application, the mesh includes polyethylene terephthalate.
In an application, the mesh includes a graft material.
In an application, the mesh includes braided strands.
In an application, the mesh is metallic.
In an application, the mesh includes a polymer.
In an application, the mesh is a fabric.
In an application, the mesh has shape memory.
In an application, the mesh inhibits movement of the implant within the tissue by (i) initially providing mechanical anchoring, and (ii) promoting tissue growth thereupon.
In an application, the mesh includes a plurality of strand segments that each helically curve at least partway around the implant body and the longitudinal axis.
In an application, the strand segments overlap each other.
In an application, each strand segment has a first end fixedly attached to a first site of the implant body, and a second end fixedly attached to a second site of the implant body.
In an application, the implant further includes a fabric disposed over the plurality of strand segments.
In an application, the mesh has (i) a delivery state in which the mesh defines a first maximum transverse diameter, and (ii) an implanted state in which the mesh defines a second maximum transverse diameter that is greater than the first transverse diameter.
In an application, the mesh has shape memory, and is biased to assume the implanted state.
In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and the first maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-0.6 mm greater than the body diameter.
In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-2 mm greater than the body diameter.
In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.5-2 mm greater than the body diameter.
In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-2 mm greater than the first maximum transverse diameter.
In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.5-2 mm greater than the first maximum transverse diameter.
In an application, the apparatus further includes a percutaneously-advanceable delivery tool via which the implant is injectable.
In an application, the tool is configured to apply a force to the mesh, the force driving the mesh toward the implanted state.
In an application, while the implant is disposed within the tool, the tool retains the mesh in the delivery state, and when the implant is deployed from the tool, the mesh automatically moves toward the implanted state.
In an application, the mesh has (i) a first end that remains attached to a first site of the implant body while the mesh moves toward the implanted state, and (ii) a second end that remains attached to a second site of the implant body while the mesh moves toward the implanted state.
In an application, the first site and the second site are disposed longitudinally between the first electrode and the second electrode.
There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:
an electrostimulator implant, including:
In an application, the wire segments are segments of a single braided wire.
In an application, the wire segments include a metal.
In an application, the wire segments include a polymer.
In an application, the anchor further includes a fabric disposed over the plurality of wire segments.
In an application, the plurality of wire segments are disposed longitudinally between the first electrode and the second electrode.
In an application, the wire segments overlap each other.
In an application, each wire segment has a first end fixedly attached to a first site of the implant body, and a second end fixedly attached to a second site of the implant body.
In an application, the plurality of wire segments collectively define a mesh that extends over at least 50 percent of an outer surface of the implant body.
In an application, the anchor has (i) a delivery state in which the wire segments define a first maximum transverse diameter, and (ii) an implanted state in which the wire segments define a second maximum transverse diameter that is greater than the first transverse diameter.
In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and the first maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-0.6 mm greater than the body diameter.
In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-2 mm greater than the body diameter.
In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.5-2 mm greater than the body diameter.
In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-2 mm greater than the first maximum transverse diameter.
In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.5-2 mm greater than the first maximum transverse diameter.
In an application, the apparatus further includes a percutaneously-advanceable delivery tool via which the implant is injectable.
In an application, the tool is configured to apply a force to the anchor, the force driving the anchor toward the implanted state.
In an application, while the implant is disposed within the tool, the tool retains the anchor in the delivery state, and when the implant is deployed from the tool, the anchor automatically moves toward the implanted state.
In an application, each wire segment has (i) a first end that remains attached to a first site of the implant body while the anchor moves toward the implanted state, and (ii) a second end that remains attached to a second site of the implant body while the anchor moves toward the implanted state.
In an application, the first site and the second site are disposed longitudinally between the first electrode and the second electrode.
In an application:
the plurality of wire segments collectively define a mesh that, in the delivery state, has a tubular shape, the tubular shape having a first end and a second end, and
the anchor is configured such that when the anchor moves toward the implanted state, the anchor becomes shorter and wider and the second end moves toward the first end.
In an application, the apparatus is configured such that, as the second end moves toward the first end, the second end slides over at least part of the implant body.
There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including an implant injectable into tissue of a subject, and including:
first and second electrodes, which define respective first and second portions of an external surface of the implant;
circuitry, configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; and
a silicone anchoring material that defines a third portion of the external surface, the third portion having a surface area that is at least 50 percent of a total surface area of the external surface.
In an application, the silicone anchoring material is shaped to define synthetic setae.
In an application, each of the setae is shaped to define a microscopic suction cup.
In an application, the third portion is disposed between the first and second portions of the implant.
In an application, the surface area of the third portion is at least 70 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.
In an application, the surface area of the third portion is less than 90 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.
In an application, the silicone anchoring material includes a silicone resin.
In an application, the silicone anchoring material includes a silicone rubber.
In an application, the third portion of the external surface is rough.
In an application, the implant includes 2-8 electrodes.
There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including an implant injectable into tissue of a subject, and including:
first and second electrodes, which define respective first and second portions of an external surface of the implant;
circuitry, configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; and
a graft material, the material defining a third portion of the external surface, the third portion having a surface area that is at least 50 percent of a total surface area of the external surface.
In an application, the third portion is disposed between the first and second portions of the implant.
In an application, the surface area of the third portion is at least 70 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.
In an application, the surface area of the third portion is less than 90 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.
In an application, the graft material is a fabric.
In an application, the graft material includes polyethylene terephthalate.
There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:
an implant, including:
In an application, the implant is an electrostimulator implant including a first electrode and a second electrode, and both the first site and the second site are between the first electrode and the second electrode.
There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:
an implant, injectable into a subject along a longitudinal axis of the implant, and including:
In an application, the tail includes silicone.
In an application, each of the nodules has a nodule diameter transverse, to the longitudinal axis, that is fixed.
In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and each of the nodules has a nodule diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, the nodule diameter being no greater than the body diameter.
There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:
an implant, including:
an adhesive; and
a delivery tool:
In an application, the adhesive is transglutaminase.
In an application, the deployment mechanism and the adhesive-dispensing mechanism are functionally linked such that the adhesive-dispensing mechanism dispenses the adhesive out of the outlet as the implant-injection mechanism deploys the implant out of the distal opening.
There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:
a delivery tube; and
an implant, having a longitudinal axis, percutaneously injectable along the longitudinal axis and out of the delivery tube, and including:
In an application, the anchor is configured such that during expansion of the anchor from the compressed state to the expanded state, the part of the anchor does not move along the longitudinal axis.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of applications thereof, taken together with the drawings, in which:
Applications of the invention relate to the inhibition of migration of implants, i.e., undesired movement of implants subsequent to their implantation in tissue of a subject. Unless stated otherwise, each of the implants described herein (i) is an electrostimulator implant comprising an implant body 22, at least two electrodes 24 (e.g., a first electrode 24a and a second electrode 24b), and circuitry 26 disposed inside the implant body, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue in which the implant is implanted, and (ii) is typically injectable into the tissue along a longitudinal axis ax1 of the implant body. The implants may comprise two or more electrodes (e.g., 2-8 electrodes).
Reference is now made to
Mesh 42 comprises one or more strands 44. Typically, strands 44 are wires. For some applications, and as shown, each strand 44 curves at least partway around implant body 22 and axis ax1. For such applications, whether mesh 42 comprises a single strand 44 (e.g., a single braided wire) or a plurality of strands 44, a plurality of strand segments (e.g., wire segments) 46 each helically curve at least partway around implant body 22 and axis ax1. For some applications, and as shown, strand segments 46 overlap each other. For example, mesh 42 may comprise a braid of strand(s) 44.
For some applications, mesh 42 is metallic (i.e., strands 44 are metallic). For some applications, mesh 42 comprises a polymer (i.e., strands 44 comprise a polymer).
Typically, mesh 42 has (i) a delivery state (
For some applications, a percutaneously-advanceable delivery tool 30 is provided, via which implant 40 is injectable. For example, tool 30 may comprise a tubular member (e.g., a needle) 32 and a deployment mechanism 34 that applies a force to implant 40 that causes the implant to become exposed from the tubular member. For some applications, mesh 42 (e.g., strands 44 thereof) has shape memory, and is biased to assume its implanted state, e.g., such that (i) tool 30 retains the mesh in its delivery state while implant 40 is disposed within the tool, and (ii) the mesh automatically assumes its implanted state upon deployment from the tool. Alternatively, tool 30 may be configured to apply a force to the mesh, which drives the mesh toward its implanted state.
For some applications, and as shown, (i) a first end 48a of mesh 42 is attached to a first site of implant body 22, and remains attached to that first site while the mesh moves toward its implanted state, and (ii) a second end 48a of mesh 42 is attached to a second site of implant body 22, and remains attached to that second site while the mesh moves toward its implanted state. That is, the first and second ends of mesh 42 are fixedly attached to respective sites of implant body 22, and do not move during expansion of the mesh. These sites of the implant body are typically longitudinally between electrodes 24a and 24b.
Implant body 22 has a body diameter d3 transverse to axis ax1. Diameter d3 is typically constant along the length of implant body 22. Alternatively, diameter d3 may represent a diameter of implant body 22 at a portion of the implant body over which mesh 42 is disposed. For some applications, diameter d1 is 0.1-0.6 mm greater than diameter d3. For some applications, diameter d2 is 0.2-2 mm (e.g., 0.5-2 mm) greater than diameter d3. For some applications, diameter d2 is 0.2-2 mm (e.g., 0.5-2 mm) greater than diameter d1.
For some applications, mesh 42 inhibits movement of implant 40 within the tissue by providing mechanical anchoring (e.g., by increasing friction between the implant and the tissue), e.g., due to the mesh providing a relatively rough surface and/or due to the radial expansion of the mesh. For some applications, mesh 42 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, mesh 42 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.
For some applications, mesh 42, in its implanted state, separates tissue 10 (i.e., solid tissue) from implant body 22, thereby forming a pocket 50 into which blood (or component thereof) may enter, and within which tissue growth may occur, thereby further securing the implant within the tissue.
Reference is made to
Typically, mesh 62 covers at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 70 percent) and/or less than 90 percent of valve body 22 of implant 60. That is, electrodes 24a and 24b define respective first and second portions of an external surface of implant 60, and mesh 62 defines a third portion of the external surface of the implant, the third portion having a surface area that is at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 70 percent) and/or less than 90 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.
For some applications, mesh 62 inhibits movement of implant 60 within the tissue by providing mechanical anchoring (e.g., by increasing friction between the implant and the tissue), e.g., due to the mesh providing a relatively rough surface. For some applications, mesh 62 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, mesh 62 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.
Reference is now made to
Reference is again made to
Reference is made to
Typically, frame 102 comprises at least one cuff 110 attached to arm 106a of each articulating member, and slidable over implant body 22 between a first site (as shown in
Typically, frame 102 defines at least one expanding portion 112 (
For some applications, frame 102 inhibits movement of implant 100 within tissue 10 by providing mechanical anchoring (e.g., by increasing friction between the implant and the tissue), e.g., due to the radial expansion of the frame. For some applications, frame 102 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, frame 102 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.
For some applications, frame 102, in its implanted state, separates tissue 10 (i.e., solid tissue) from implant body 22, thereby forming a pocket 118 into which blood (or component thereof) may enter, and within which tissue growth may occur, thereby further securing the implant within the tissue.
Reference is now made to
Reference is made to
Segments of the strands overlap each other, and each strand (or a segment thereof) may helically curve at least partway around longitudinal axis ax1 of implant body 22. Unlike mesh 42 of implant 40, mesh 144 of implant 140 is disposed at and end of the implant, typically such that electrode 24a and electrode 24b are both disposed on the same side of anchor 142 (e.g., distally to the anchor). As for other implants described herein, implant 140 is delivered percutaneously using an implantation tool 150, which typically comprises tubular member 32 and a deployment mechanism 154. For some applications deployment mechanism 154 is similar to other deployment mechanisms described herein. Deployment mechanism 154 is reversibly coupled to implant 140 (e.g., to a proximal end of implant body 22 of implant 140).
As shown in
Reference is made to
For some applications, anchor 162 comprises anchor 142 covered in fabric 166. For such applications, frame 164 comprises mesh 144.
Reference is made to
For some applications, silicone anchoring material 182 inhibits migration of implant 180 by increasing friction between the implant and tissue 10, e.g., due to the native characteristics (e.g., roughness) of the silicone material.
For some application, and as shown, silicone anchoring material 182 is shaped to define synthetic setae 184, e.g., generally resembling those of a gecko's feet. Setae 184 are typically 0.1-1 mm long. Setae 184 are typically 0.1-1 mm wide. Typically, silicone anchoring material 182 defines 1-100 (e.g., 10-100) setae per mm^2.
For some applications, each seta 184 is shaped to define a microscopic suction cup 186, e.g., at a distal end of the seta.
For some applications, silicone anchoring material 182 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, silicone anchoring material 182 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.
Reference is made to
Tail 202 has a plurality of nodules 204 distributed therealong. So as to limit the maximum diameter of implant 200, each nodule typically has a diameter transverse to axis ax1 that is no greater than diameter d3 of implant body 22. Therefore tail 202 may alternatively or additionally be described as (i) having a diameter that is equal or less than diameter d3 of implant body 22, and (ii) defining a plurality of notches 206 distributed therealong, nodules 204 being defined as portions of tail 202 that are between notches 206.
Tail 202, and nodules 204 are typically not expandable. That is, unlike expanding anchors, such as barbs, nodules 204 typically have a fixed diameter d6 both during and after implantation.
For some applications, tail 202 inhibits migration of implant 180 by increasing friction between the implant and tissue 10. For some applications, tail 202 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, tail 202 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.
Reference is made to
Delivery tool 230 has one or more outlets 238, and an adhesive-dispensing mechanism 242 that is configured to dispense adhesive 240 out of the outlets. For example, tubular member 232 may be shaped to define one or more secondary lumens 236 that end at outlets 238, and mechanism 242 forces adhesive 240 (e.g., from a reservoir 246) through lumens 236.
For some applications, adhesive-dispensing mechanism 242 is functionally linked to implant-injection mechanism 244, such that adhesive-dispensing mechanism 242 dispenses adhesive 240 out of outlets 238 as implant-injection mechanism 244 deploys implant 220 out of distal opening 231. For example, operation of a single controller (e.g., a trigger) 248 may simultaneously dispense adhesive 240 out of outlets 238 and deploy implant 220 out of the distal opening.
It is to be noted that adhesive 240 may or may not comprise a substance that is conventionally regarded as an adhesive. For example, adhesive 240 may comprise a surgical adhesive and/or a bioadhesive. Alternatively or additionally, adhesive 240 may comprise a substance that triggers chemical changes that cause adherence of implant 220 to tissue 10. For example, adhesive 240 may comprise an enzyme, such as transglutaminase.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof that are not in the prior art, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3411507 | Wingrove | Nov 1968 | A |
3693625 | Auphan | Sep 1972 | A |
4019518 | Maurer et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4338945 | Kosugi et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4392496 | Stanton | Jul 1983 | A |
4535785 | Van Den Honert | Aug 1985 | A |
4559948 | Liss et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4573481 | Bullara | Mar 1986 | A |
4585005 | Lue et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4602624 | Naples | Jul 1986 | A |
4608985 | Crish | Sep 1986 | A |
4628942 | Sweeney | Dec 1986 | A |
4632116 | Rosen | Dec 1986 | A |
4649936 | Ungar | Mar 1987 | A |
4663102 | Brenman et al. | May 1987 | A |
4739764 | Lue et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4808157 | Coombs | Feb 1989 | A |
4867164 | Zabara | Sep 1989 | A |
4926865 | Oman | May 1990 | A |
4962751 | Krauter | Oct 1990 | A |
5025807 | Zabara | Jun 1991 | A |
5069680 | Grandjean | Dec 1991 | A |
5178161 | Kovacs | Jan 1993 | A |
5188104 | Wernicke | Feb 1993 | A |
5199428 | Obel et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5199430 | Fang | Apr 1993 | A |
5203326 | Collins | Apr 1993 | A |
5205285 | Baker, Jr. | Apr 1993 | A |
5215086 | Terry, Jr. | Jun 1993 | A |
5263480 | Wernicke | Nov 1993 | A |
5282468 | Klepinski | Feb 1994 | A |
5284479 | De Jong | Feb 1994 | A |
5292344 | Douglas | Mar 1994 | A |
5299569 | Wernicke | Apr 1994 | A |
5314495 | Kovacs | May 1994 | A |
5330507 | Schwartz | Jul 1994 | A |
5335657 | Terry, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5411535 | Fujii et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423872 | Cigaina | Jun 1995 | A |
5439938 | Snyder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454840 | Krakovsky et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5487760 | Villafana | Jan 1996 | A |
5505201 | Grill, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5540730 | Terry, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540733 | Testerman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540734 | Zabara | Jul 1996 | A |
5549655 | Erickson | Aug 1996 | A |
5571150 | Wernicke | Nov 1996 | A |
5591216 | Testerman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5634462 | Tyler et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5690681 | Geddes et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690691 | Chen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700282 | Zabara | Dec 1997 | A |
5707400 | Terry, Jr. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711316 | Elsberry et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716385 | Mittal | Feb 1998 | A |
5755750 | Petruska | May 1998 | A |
5776170 | Macdonald et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776171 | Peckham | Jul 1998 | A |
5814089 | Stokes | Sep 1998 | A |
5824027 | Hoffer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832932 | Elsberry et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833709 | Rise et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836994 | Bourgeois | Nov 1998 | A |
5861019 | Sun et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5916239 | Geddes et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5938584 | Ardito et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944680 | Christopherson | Aug 1999 | A |
5954758 | Peckham | Sep 1999 | A |
5991664 | Seligman | Nov 1999 | A |
6002964 | Feler et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026326 | Bardy | Feb 2000 | A |
6026328 | Peckham | Feb 2000 | A |
6032076 | Melvin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058331 | King et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066163 | John | May 2000 | A |
6083249 | Familoni | Jul 2000 | A |
6086525 | Davey et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091977 | Tarjan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091992 | Bourgeois | Jul 2000 | A |
6094598 | Elsberry et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097984 | Douglas | Aug 2000 | A |
6104955 | Bourgeois | Aug 2000 | A |
6104960 | Duysens et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119516 | Hock | Sep 2000 | A |
6146335 | Gozani | Nov 2000 | A |
6148232 | Avrahami | Nov 2000 | A |
6169924 | Meloy et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205359 | Boveja | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212435 | Lattner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214032 | Loeb et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230061 | Hartung | May 2001 | B1 |
6240316 | Richmond | May 2001 | B1 |
6266564 | Hill et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272383 | Grey | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292703 | Meier et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319241 | King | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332089 | Acker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341236 | Osorio et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345202 | Richmond et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6356784 | Lozano et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356788 | Boveja | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6366813 | Dilorenzo | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405079 | Ansarinia | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442432 | Lee | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6445953 | Bulkes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449507 | Hill et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456878 | Yerich et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463328 | John | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473644 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493585 | Plicchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496729 | Thompson | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496730 | Kleckner et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6582441 | He et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600954 | Cohen | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600956 | Maschino et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606521 | Paspa et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610713 | Tracey | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6618627 | Lattner et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641542 | Cho et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6682480 | Habib et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6735474 | Loeb et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6770022 | Mechlenburg | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6829508 | Schulman | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839594 | Cohen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6892098 | Ayal | May 2005 | B2 |
6907295 | Gross et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909917 | Woods et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7025730 | Cho et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027860 | Bruninga et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047076 | Li et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054692 | Whitehurst et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7149575 | Ostroff et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7177698 | Klosterman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7212867 | Van Venrooij et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228178 | Carroll | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7277749 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289853 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7324852 | Barolat et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324853 | Ayal | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7483752 | Von arx et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7502652 | Gaunt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7532932 | Denker et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7536226 | Williams | May 2009 | B2 |
7628750 | Cohen | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7630771 | Cauller | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634313 | Kroll et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7655014 | Ko et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657311 | Bardy et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657322 | Bardy et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660632 | Kirby et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680538 | Durand et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7711434 | Denker et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7736379 | Ewers et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780625 | Bardy | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797050 | Libbus et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7848818 | Barolat et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7917226 | Nghiem | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7937148 | Jacobson | May 2011 | B2 |
7941218 | Sambelashvili et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7974706 | Moffitt et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991467 | Markowitz et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996089 | Haugland et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996092 | Mrva et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019443 | Schleicher et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8055350 | Roberts | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075556 | Betts | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8090438 | Bardy et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115448 | John | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131377 | Shi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8170675 | Alataris et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8177792 | Lubock et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185207 | Molnar et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8209021 | Alataris et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8224453 | De Ridder | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255057 | Fang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8355792 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359102 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359103 | Alataris et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8396559 | Alataris et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8428748 | Alataris et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463404 | Levi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8509905 | Alataris et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8509906 | Walker et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8554326 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8634927 | Olson et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649874 | Alataris et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8694108 | Alataris et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8694109 | Alataris et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8712533 | Alataris et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718781 | Alataris et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8718782 | Alataris et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8755893 | Gross et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768472 | Fang et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774926 | Alataris et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788045 | Gross et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792988 | Alataris et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8849410 | Walker et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8862239 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8868192 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8874217 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8874221 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8874222 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8880177 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8886326 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8886327 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8886328 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8892209 | Alataris et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020077554 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099419 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020124848 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030040774 | Terry et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030060858 | Kieval et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030100933 | Ayal | May 2003 | A1 |
20030176898 | Gross et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015205 | Whitehurst et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019368 | Lattner et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040048795 | Ivanova et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073270 | Firlik et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040167584 | Carroll et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040249431 | Ransbury | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254624 | Johnson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050131495 | Parramon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143789 | Whitehurst et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165457 | Benser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060100668 | Ben-David et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060155345 | Williams et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060271137 | Stanton-Hicks | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032827 | Katims | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067000 | Strother et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067007 | Schulman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073354 | Knudson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070173893 | Pitts | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080009914 | Buysman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021336 | Dobak | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027513 | Carbunaru | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039915 | Van Den Biggelaar | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080103407 | Bolea et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103572 | Gerber | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119911 | Rosero | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132964 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080269740 | Bonde et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090012590 | Inman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036975 | Ward et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048642 | Goroszeniuk | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090149912 | Dacey et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090152954 | Le et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090204170 | Hastings et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204173 | Fang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090270951 | Kallmyer | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281594 | King et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326602 | Glukhovsky et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100094367 | Sen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121405 | Ternes et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125310 | Wilson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125313 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100198298 | Glukhovsky et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211131 | Williams et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241195 | Meadows et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249875 | Kishawi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100280568 | Bulkes et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305392 | Gross et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312320 | Faltys et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324630 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110034782 | Sugimachi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046696 | Barolat et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087337 | Forsell | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093036 | Mashiach | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137365 | Ben-Ezra et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152965 | Mashiach | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160793 | Gindele | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160798 | Ackermann et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208260 | Jacobson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208271 | Dobak | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224744 | Moffitt et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110270339 | Murray, III et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282412 | Glukhovsky et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301670 | Gross et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010694 | Lutter et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035679 | Dagan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041511 | Lee | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041514 | Gross et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120065701 | Cauller | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083857 | Bradley et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101326 | Simon et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123498 | Gross | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130448 | Woods et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130463 | Ben-David et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158081 | Gross et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120296389 | Fang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130006326 | Ackermann et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130066393 | Gross et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140214134 | Peterson | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150004709 | Nazarpoor | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150018728 | Gross et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150080979 | Lasko et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150258339 | Burchiel et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150335882 | Gross et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160206882 | Oron et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102008054403 | Jun 2010 | DE |
0 688 577 | Dec 1995 | EP |
1533000 | May 2005 | EP |
9810832 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9926530 | Jun 1999 | WO |
0110375 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0110432 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0126729 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0209808 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2004064729 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2006102626 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007019491 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2009055574 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009110935 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011154937 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012012591 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2013035092 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013106884 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013111137 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013156038 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013164829 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014087337 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2016172109 | Oct 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kucklick, Theodore R., ed. The medical device R&D handbook. Chapter 3—Intro to needles and cannulae. CRC Press, 2012. |
An Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/735,741. |
A. Oliven, Electrical stimulation of the genioglossus to improve pharyngeal patency in obstructive sleep apnea: comparison of resultsobtained during sleep and anesthesia, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health May 2009;148(5):315-9, 350, 349—an abstract. |
Mortimer et al., Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Stimulation, Neuroprosthetics Theory and Practice, Chapter 4.2, 2004, p. 632-638. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 29, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2013/050069. |
Zabara J., Inhibition of experimental seizures in canines by repetitive vagal stimulation, Epilepsia. Nov.-Dec. 1992;33 (6):1005-12, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1464256—an abstract. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Apr. 29, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IB2013/060607. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Jul. 11, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2013/050069. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 9, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IB2013/060607. |
A Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,433. |
A Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,102. |
An Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,433. |
Shealy (1967) Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns. |
Nov. 30, 2015 massdevice.com—St. Jude Medical's Proclaim Elite debuts in Europe. |
Kaplan et al. (2009) Design and fabrication of an injection tool for neuromuscular microstimulators. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European App No. 11792044.7. |
An Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/226,723. |
Lind (2012) Advances in spinal cord stimulation. |
Physical Therapy Web.com—Interferential Current (IFC) Equipment. |
electrotherapy.org—Interferential Therapy. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/985,353, filed Nov. 5, 2007. |
DJOGlobal.com—Interferential Current Therapy (IFC). |
Brindley (1983) A technique for anodally blocking large nerve fibers. |
Robert Szmurlo, Jacek Starzynski, Stanislaw Wincenciak, Andrzej Rysz, (2009) “Numerical model of vagus nerve electrical stimulation”, COMPEL—The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, vol. 28 Iss: 1, pp. 211-220. |
Filiz, Sinan, et al. “Micromilling of microbarbs for medical implants.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 48.3 (2008): 459-472. |
UCLA Team Reports Initial Success with Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation epilepsy. https://web.archive.org/web/20121020145122/https:/www.epilepsy.com/epilepsy/newsletter/apr09—STIM. |
C. de Balthasar, G. Cosendai, M. Hansen, D. Canfield, L. Chu, R. Davis, and J. Schulman, “Attachment of leads to RF-BION® microstimulators.” Jul. 2005. |
D.W. Eisele, A.R. Schwartz, and P.L. Smith, “Tongue neuromuscular and direct hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.,” Otolaryngologic clinics of North America, vol. 36, 2003, p. 501. |
G.E. Loeb, F.J.R. Richmond, J. Singh, R.A. Peck, W. Tan, Q. Zou, and N. Sachs, “RF-powered BIONs™ for stimulation and sensing,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS'04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2005, pp. 4182-4185. |
G.E. Loeb, F.J. Richmond, and L.L. Baker, “The BION devices: injectable interfaces with peripheral nerves and muscles,” Neurosurgical focus, vol. 20, 2006, pp. 1-9. |
E.A. Mann, T. Burnett, S. Cornell, and C.L. Ludlow, “The effect of neuromuscular stimulation of the genioglossus on the hypopharyngeal airway,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 112, 2002, pp. 351-356. |
A. Oliven, R.P. Schnall, G. Pillar, N. Gavriely, and M. Odeh, “Sublingual electrical stimulation of the tongue during wakefulness and sleep,” Respiration physiology, vol. 127, 2001, pp. 217-226. |
A. Oliven, D.J. O'Hearn, A. Boudewyns, M. Odeh, W. De Backer, P. van de Heyning, P.L. Smith, D.W. Eisele, L. Allan, H. Schneider, and others, “Upper airway response to electrical stimulation of the genioglossus in obstructive sleep apnea,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 95, 2003, p. 2023. |
A. Oliven, M. Odeh, L. Geitini, R. Oliven, U. Steinfeld, A.R. Schwartz, and N. Tov, “Effect of coactivation of tongue protrusor and retractor muscles on pharyngeal lumen and airflow in sleep apnea patients,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 103, 2007, p. 1662. |
A.R. Schwartz, D.W. Eisele, A. Hari, R. Testerman, D. Erickson, and P.L. Smith, “Electrical stimulation of the lingual musculature in obstructive sleep apnea,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 81, 1996, p. 643. |
W.H. Tran, G.E. Loeb, F.J.R. Richmond, A.C. Dupont, K.C. Mahutte, C.S.H. Sassoon, and M.J. Dickel, “Development of asynchronous, intralingual electrical stimulation to treat obstructive sleep apnea,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2003. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2004, pp. 375-378. |
W.H. Tran, G.E. Loeb, F.J.R. Richmond, R. Ahmed, G.T. Clark, and P.B. Haberman, “First subject evaluated with simulated BION™ treatment in genioglossus to prevent obstructive sleep apnea,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS'04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2005, pp. 4287-4289. |
P.R. Troyk, “Injectable electronic identification, monitoring, and stimulation systems,” Biomedical Engineering, vol. 1, 1999, p. 177. |
T.K. Whitehurst, J.H. Schulman, K.N. Jaax, and R. Carbunaru, “The Bion® Microstimulator and its Clinical Applications,” Implantable Neural Prostheses 1, 2009, pp. 253-273. |
D.J. Young, “Wireless powering and data telemetry for biomedical implants,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2009, pp. 3221-3224. |
Reid R. Harrison, et al., “Wireless Neural Recording with Single Low-Power Integrated Circuit”, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. Aug. 2009; 17(4): 322-329. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Apr. 17, 2012 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00870. |
Patents Galore: Implantable Neurostimulators Fight Snoring and Corpse Eye-Proof Scanners. Printout from http://medgadget.com/2006/03/patents—galore.html (Downloaded Jan. 2012). |
Chris Seper, “Neuros Medical Launches to Develop New Device to Block Amputee, Chronic Pain”, Mar. 16, 2009. |
Urgent® PC, Simple. Safe. Effective. Neuromodulation System, Uroplasty, Mar. 2009. |
“JumpStart and Case Technology Ventures Invest in Neuros Medical”, CTV Case Technology Ventures, Mar. 17, 2009. |
“Responses to median and tibial nerve stimulation in patients with chronic neuropathic pain”, by Theuvenet, Brain Topography, vol. 11, No. 4, 1999, pp. 305-313(9)—an abstract. |
Armstrong, J, “Is electrical stimulation effective in reducing neuropathic pain in patients with diabetes?”, by Foot Ankle Surg. Jul.-Aug. 1997; 36(4): 260-3—an abstract. |
Ross Davis, Cerebellar Stimulation for Cerebral Palsy Spasticity, Function and Seizures. Clinical Neuroscience Center, 1999. pp. 290-299. |
An Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2004, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 10/254,024. |
Bathien et al., Inhibition and synchronisation of tremor induced by a muscle twitch. J. Neurol, Neurosurg. and Psych. 1980, 43, 713-718. |
Jobges et al., Vibratory proprioceptive stimulation affects Parkinsonian tremor. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 8(3), 171-176, Jan. 2002. |
Mones and Weiss, The response of the tremor of patients with Parkinsonism to peripheral nerve stimulation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 1969, 32. 512-519. |
Y. Zhang, et al., “Optimal Ventricular Rate Slowing During Atrial Fibrillation by Feedback AV Nodal-Selective Vagal Stimulation”, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282:H1102-H1110, 2002. |
N.J.M Rijkhoff, et al., “Selective Stimulation of Small Diameter Nerve Fibers in a Mixed Bundle”, Proceedings of the Annual Project Meeting Sensations/Neuros and Mid Term Review Meeting Neuros, Apr. 21-23, 1999. |
M. Manfredi, “Differential Block of conduction of larger fibers in peripheral nerve by direct current”, Arch. Ital. Biol. 108:52-71, 1970. |
A Restriction Requirement dated May 11, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/946,246. |
Cerebral Palsy, Barry S. Russman MD, CCurrent Science Inc. 2000. |
A Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 7, 2005, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 10/254,024. |
A Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 26, 2004, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 10/254,024. |
An Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,102. |
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Nov. 14, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000440. |
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 10, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000440. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/263,834, filed Jan. 2, 2001. |
Sweeney JD et al., “An asymmetric two electrode cuff for generation of unidirectionally propagated action potentials,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-33(6) (1986). |
An Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,102. |
Invitation to pay Additional Fees dated May 10, 2013 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2013/005069. |
Naples GG et al., “A spiral nerve cuff electrode for peripheral nerve stimulation,” by IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 35(11) (1988). |
Sweeney JD et al., “A nerve cuff technique for selective excitation of peripheral nerve trunk regions,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 37(7) (1990). |
Ungar Ij et al., “Generation of unidirectionally propagating action potentials using a monopolar electrode cuff,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 14:437-450 (1986). |
Fitzpatrick et al., in “A nerve cuff design for the selective activation and blocking of myelinated nerve fibers,” Ann. Conf. of the IEEE Eng. in Medicine and Biology Soc, 13(2), 906 (1991). |
Rijkhoff NJ et al., “Orderly recruitment of motoneurons in an acute rabbit model,” Ann. Conf. of the IEEE Eng., Medicine and Biology Soc., 20(5):2564 (1998). |
Van den Honert C et al., “A technique for collision block of peripheral nerve: Frequency dependence,” MP-12, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 28:379-382 (1981). |
Baratta R et al., “Orderly stimulation of skeletal muscle motor units with tripolar nerve cuff electrode,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 36(8):836-43 (1989). |
Van den Honert C et al., “Generation of unidirectionally propagated action potentials in a peripheral nerve by brief stimuli,” Science, 206:1311-1312 (1979). |
M. Devor, “Pain Networks”, Handbook of Brand Theory and Neural Networks, Ed M.A. Arbib MIT Press pp. 696-701, 1998. |
Epilepsy center. http://www.bcm.tmc.edu/neural/struct/epilep/epilpsy—vagus.html. May 31, 2011 (2 Versions). |
J.F. Cortese, “Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Control of Intractable Epileptic Seizures”, May 31, 2001. |
Evetovich T.K. et al., Gender comparisons of the mechanomyographic responses to minimal concentric and eccentric isokinetic muscle actions, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1998 pp. 1697-1702. Abstract. |
An Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,433. |
An Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,102. |
Chow et al., Evaluation of Cardiovascular Stents as Antennas for Implantable Wireless Applications, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, No. 10, Oct. 2009. |
Dean, J. et al., “Motor Pattern Generation”, Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, pp. 696-701. |
Hu et al., Percutaneous Biphasic Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Jan. 2008 vol. 55 Issue:1 p. 181-187—an abstract. |
Extended European Search Report issued in EP16196878.9 on Feb. 3, 2017. |
An Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,626. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170136232 A1 | May 2017 | US |