Inhibition of implant migration

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9713707
  • Patent Number
    9,713,707
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 12, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 25, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
An electrostimulator implant comprises (i) an implant body, the implant being injectable into tissue of a subject along a longitudinal axis of the implant body, (ii) first and second electrodes, disposed on respective first and second portions of the implant body; (iii) circuitry, disposed inside the implant body, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; and (iv) a mesh, disposed over at least 50 percent of the implant body, and configured to serve as an anchor of the implant. Other embodiments are also described.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Some applications of the present invention relate in general to medical devices. More specifically, some applications of the present invention relate to percutaneous implants.


BACKGROUND

Neurological disorders affect the nerves, muscles or the brain. Many neurological disorders reduce or eliminate voluntary recruitment of muscles, which may result in loss of ability to perform motor tasks or to maintain systems that depend on muscle activity for their function. Many neurological disorders cause pain.


Neurostimulation is a clinical tool used to treat various neurological disorders. This technique involves modulation of the nervous system by electrically activating fibers in the body. Percutaneous implants exist for providing neurostimulation.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Some applications of the invention relate to the inhibition of migration of implants, i.e., undesired movement of implants subsequent to their implantation in tissue of a subject. The implants are typically electrostimulator implants comprising an implant body and at least two electrodes disposed on the implant body.


For some applications, migration of the implant is inhibited by providing a mesh disposed over at least part of the implant body. The mesh comprises a plurality of strands, which may comprise a metal, a polymer, a fiber, or another material. For example, the mesh may be a metallic mesh, a polymer mesh, and/or a fabric. For some applications, the mesh is braided. For some applications, the mesh is disposed over an expanding frame, which itself may be a mesh. For some applications, the frame is provided without the mesh. The mesh and/or the frame serves to inhibit migration of the implant, thereby serving as an anchor.


For some applications, a mesh and/or a frame are provided at an end of the implant, rather than being disposed over the implant body.


For some applications, migration of the implant is inhibited by providing a silicone anchoring material disposed over at least part of the implant body. For some such applications, the silicone anchoring material is shaped to define synthetic setae.


For some applications, migration of the implant is inhibited by providing a flexible tail, coupled to the implant body, and typically defining a plurality of nodules and/or a plurality of notches distributed therealong.


For some applications, a system is provided whereby a delivery tool that delivers the implant also delivers an adhesive to the implantation site.


There is therefore provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:


an electrostimulator implant, including:

    • an implant body, the implant being injectable into tissue of a subject along a longitudinal axis of the implant body,
    • first and second electrodes, disposed on respective first and second portions of the implant body;
    • circuitry, disposed inside the implant body, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; and
    • a mesh, disposed over at least 50 percent of the implant body, and configured to serve as an anchor of the implant.


In an application, the mesh includes a tissue-growth scaffold.


In an application, the mesh is disposed over a third portion of the implant body, the third portion being longitudinally between the first and second portions.


In an application, the mesh is disposed over at least 70 percent of the outer surface of the implant.


In an application, the mesh is disposed over less than 90 percent of the outer surface of the implant.


In an application, the mesh includes polyethylene terephthalate.


In an application, the mesh includes a graft material.


In an application, the mesh includes braided strands.


In an application, the mesh is metallic.


In an application, the mesh includes a polymer.


In an application, the mesh is a fabric.


In an application, the mesh has shape memory.


In an application, the mesh inhibits movement of the implant within the tissue by (i) initially providing mechanical anchoring, and (ii) promoting tissue growth thereupon.


In an application, the mesh includes a plurality of strand segments that each helically curve at least partway around the implant body and the longitudinal axis.


In an application, the strand segments overlap each other.


In an application, each strand segment has a first end fixedly attached to a first site of the implant body, and a second end fixedly attached to a second site of the implant body.


In an application, the implant further includes a fabric disposed over the plurality of strand segments.


In an application, the mesh has (i) a delivery state in which the mesh defines a first maximum transverse diameter, and (ii) an implanted state in which the mesh defines a second maximum transverse diameter that is greater than the first transverse diameter.


In an application, the mesh has shape memory, and is biased to assume the implanted state.


In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and the first maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-0.6 mm greater than the body diameter.


In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-2 mm greater than the body diameter.


In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.5-2 mm greater than the body diameter.


In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-2 mm greater than the first maximum transverse diameter.


In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.5-2 mm greater than the first maximum transverse diameter.


In an application, the apparatus further includes a percutaneously-advanceable delivery tool via which the implant is injectable.


In an application, the tool is configured to apply a force to the mesh, the force driving the mesh toward the implanted state.


In an application, while the implant is disposed within the tool, the tool retains the mesh in the delivery state, and when the implant is deployed from the tool, the mesh automatically moves toward the implanted state.


In an application, the mesh has (i) a first end that remains attached to a first site of the implant body while the mesh moves toward the implanted state, and (ii) a second end that remains attached to a second site of the implant body while the mesh moves toward the implanted state.


In an application, the first site and the second site are disposed longitudinally between the first electrode and the second electrode.


There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:


an electrostimulator implant, including:

    • an implant body, the implant being injectable into tissue of a subject along a longitudinal axis of the implant body,
    • first and second electrodes, disposed at respective first and second portions of the implant;
    • circuitry, disposed inside the implant body, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; and
    • an anchor that includes a plurality of wire segments that each helically curve at least partway around the implant body and the longitudinal axis.


In an application, the wire segments are segments of a single braided wire.


In an application, the wire segments include a metal.


In an application, the wire segments include a polymer.


In an application, the anchor further includes a fabric disposed over the plurality of wire segments.


In an application, the plurality of wire segments are disposed longitudinally between the first electrode and the second electrode.


In an application, the wire segments overlap each other.


In an application, each wire segment has a first end fixedly attached to a first site of the implant body, and a second end fixedly attached to a second site of the implant body.


In an application, the plurality of wire segments collectively define a mesh that extends over at least 50 percent of an outer surface of the implant body.


In an application, the anchor has (i) a delivery state in which the wire segments define a first maximum transverse diameter, and (ii) an implanted state in which the wire segments define a second maximum transverse diameter that is greater than the first transverse diameter.


In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and the first maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-0.6 mm greater than the body diameter.


In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-2 mm greater than the body diameter.


In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.5-2 mm greater than the body diameter.


In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.2-2 mm greater than the first maximum transverse diameter.


In an application, the second maximum transverse diameter is 0.5-2 mm greater than the first maximum transverse diameter.


In an application, the apparatus further includes a percutaneously-advanceable delivery tool via which the implant is injectable.


In an application, the tool is configured to apply a force to the anchor, the force driving the anchor toward the implanted state.


In an application, while the implant is disposed within the tool, the tool retains the anchor in the delivery state, and when the implant is deployed from the tool, the anchor automatically moves toward the implanted state.


In an application, each wire segment has (i) a first end that remains attached to a first site of the implant body while the anchor moves toward the implanted state, and (ii) a second end that remains attached to a second site of the implant body while the anchor moves toward the implanted state.


In an application, the first site and the second site are disposed longitudinally between the first electrode and the second electrode.


In an application:


the plurality of wire segments collectively define a mesh that, in the delivery state, has a tubular shape, the tubular shape having a first end and a second end, and


the anchor is configured such that when the anchor moves toward the implanted state, the anchor becomes shorter and wider and the second end moves toward the first end.


In an application, the apparatus is configured such that, as the second end moves toward the first end, the second end slides over at least part of the implant body.


There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including an implant injectable into tissue of a subject, and including:


first and second electrodes, which define respective first and second portions of an external surface of the implant;


circuitry, configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; and


a silicone anchoring material that defines a third portion of the external surface, the third portion having a surface area that is at least 50 percent of a total surface area of the external surface.


In an application, the silicone anchoring material is shaped to define synthetic setae.


In an application, each of the setae is shaped to define a microscopic suction cup.


In an application, the third portion is disposed between the first and second portions of the implant.


In an application, the surface area of the third portion is at least 70 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.


In an application, the surface area of the third portion is less than 90 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.


In an application, the silicone anchoring material includes a silicone resin.


In an application, the silicone anchoring material includes a silicone rubber.


In an application, the third portion of the external surface is rough.


In an application, the implant includes 2-8 electrodes.


There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including an implant injectable into tissue of a subject, and including:


first and second electrodes, which define respective first and second portions of an external surface of the implant;


circuitry, configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; and


a graft material, the material defining a third portion of the external surface, the third portion having a surface area that is at least 50 percent of a total surface area of the external surface.


In an application, the third portion is disposed between the first and second portions of the implant.


In an application, the surface area of the third portion is at least 70 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.


In an application, the surface area of the third portion is less than 90 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.


In an application, the graft material is a fabric.


In an application, the graft material includes polyethylene terephthalate.


There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:


an implant, including:

    • an implant body, the implant being injectable into tissue of a subject along a longitudinal axis of the implant body;
    • first and second electrodes, which define respective first and second portions of an external surface of the implant;
    • circuitry, disposed inside the implant body, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; and
    • an anchor that includes:
      • a cuff that circumscribes the implant body and is slidable over the implant body between a first site and a second site of the implant body, and
      • a plurality of articulating members having (i) a first arm attached to the cuff, and (ii) a second arm, the first arm articulatably coupled to the second arm at a joint such that, (i) when the cuff is at the first site, the joint is disposed at a first lateral distance from the implant body, and (ii) when the cuff is at the second site, the joint is disposed at a second lateral distance from the implant body.


In an application, the implant is an electrostimulator implant including a first electrode and a second electrode, and both the first site and the second site are between the first electrode and the second electrode.


There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:


an implant, injectable into a subject along a longitudinal axis of the implant, and including:

    • an implant body;
    • circuitry disposed inside the implant body;
    • at least one electrode disposed on an external surface of the implant body, the circuitry being configured to drive the at least one electrode to apply current; and
    • a flexible tail, extending along the longitudinal axis away from the implant body, and having a plurality of nodules distributed along the tail.


In an application, the tail includes silicone.


In an application, each of the nodules has a nodule diameter transverse, to the longitudinal axis, that is fixed.


In an application, the implant body has a body diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, and each of the nodules has a nodule diameter transverse to the longitudinal axis, the nodule diameter being no greater than the body diameter.


There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:


an implant, including:

    • an implant body;
    • first and second electrodes, which define respective first and second portions of an external surface of the implant;
    • circuitry, disposed inside the implant body, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply current;


an adhesive; and


a delivery tool:

    • configured to house the implant and to be percutaneously advanced into a subject,
    • having a deployment mechanism configured to inject the implant into a tissue site of the subject by deploying the implant, along a longitudinal axis of the implant body, out of a distal opening of the tool, and
    • having an outlet, and including an adhesive-dispensing mechanism configured to dispense the adhesive out of the outlet.


In an application, the adhesive is transglutaminase.


In an application, the deployment mechanism and the adhesive-dispensing mechanism are functionally linked such that the adhesive-dispensing mechanism dispenses the adhesive out of the outlet as the implant-injection mechanism deploys the implant out of the distal opening.


There is further provided, in accordance with an application of the present invention, apparatus, including:


a delivery tube; and


an implant, having a longitudinal axis, percutaneously injectable along the longitudinal axis and out of the delivery tube, and including:

    • an elongate body;
    • first and second electrodes disposed on an external surface of the elongate body;
    • circuitry, configured to drive the electrodes to apply current; and
    • an anchor:
      • coupled to a portion of the elongate body,
      • having a compressed state in which the implant fits within the delivery tube,
      • having an expanded state in which a part of the anchor is a widest region of the anchor, and protrudes laterally outward from the elongate body further than in the compressed state, and
      • configured such that during expansion of the anchor from the compressed state to the expanded state, the part of the anchor moves less than 1 mm along the longitudinal axis.


In an application, the anchor is configured such that during expansion of the anchor from the compressed state to the expanded state, the part of the anchor does not move along the longitudinal axis.


The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of applications thereof, taken together with the drawings, in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-B are schematic illustrations of an implant comprising a mesh disposed over the body of the implant, in accordance with some applications of the invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an implant comprising a mesh disposed over the body of the implant, in accordance with some applications of the invention;



FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of an implant comprising a fabric disposed over a mesh, in accordance with some applications of the invention;



FIGS. 4A-B are schematic illustrations of an implant comprising an expanding frame disposed over the body of the implant, in accordance with some applications of the invention;



FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of an implant comprising a fabric disposed over a frame, in accordance with some applications of the invention;



FIGS. 6A-C are schematic illustrations of an implant comprising an anchor that comprises a mesh in accordance with some applications of the invention;



FIGS. 7A-B are schematic illustrations of an implant comprising an anchor that comprises an expandable frame covered in a fabric, in accordance with some applications of the invention;



FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of an implant comprising a silicone anchoring material, in accordance with some applications of the invention;



FIGS. 9A-B are schematic illustrations of an implant comprising a flexible tail, in accordance with some applications of the invention; and



FIGS. 10A-C are schematic illustrations of a system comprising an implant, a delivery tool, and an adhesive, in accordance with some applications of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Applications of the invention relate to the inhibition of migration of implants, i.e., undesired movement of implants subsequent to their implantation in tissue of a subject. Unless stated otherwise, each of the implants described herein (i) is an electrostimulator implant comprising an implant body 22, at least two electrodes 24 (e.g., a first electrode 24a and a second electrode 24b), and circuitry 26 disposed inside the implant body, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue in which the implant is implanted, and (ii) is typically injectable into the tissue along a longitudinal axis ax1 of the implant body. The implants may comprise two or more electrodes (e.g., 2-8 electrodes).


Reference is now made to FIGS. 1A-B, which are schematic illustrations of an implant 40, comprising a mesh 42, disposed over implant body 22 of implant 40, in accordance with some applications of the invention. FIG. 1A shows implant 40 being implanted in tissue 10 using an implantation tool 30, and FIG. 16 shows the tool being withdrawn from the tissue after deployment of the implant. Mesh 42 is configured to serve as an anchor for implant 40 (i.e., to inhibit post-implantation migration of the implant). Mesh 42 is typically disposed over at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 70 percent) of implant body 22. For some applications, mesh 42 is disposed over less than 90 percent of implant body 22. Mesh 42 is disposed over a portion of implant body 22 that is longitudinally between the portions of the implant body on which electrodes 24a and 24b are disposed.


Mesh 42 comprises one or more strands 44. Typically, strands 44 are wires. For some applications, and as shown, each strand 44 curves at least partway around implant body 22 and axis ax1. For such applications, whether mesh 42 comprises a single strand 44 (e.g., a single braided wire) or a plurality of strands 44, a plurality of strand segments (e.g., wire segments) 46 each helically curve at least partway around implant body 22 and axis ax1. For some applications, and as shown, strand segments 46 overlap each other. For example, mesh 42 may comprise a braid of strand(s) 44.


For some applications, mesh 42 is metallic (i.e., strands 44 are metallic). For some applications, mesh 42 comprises a polymer (i.e., strands 44 comprise a polymer).


Typically, mesh 42 has (i) a delivery state (FIG. 1A) in which the mesh defines a first maximum transverse diameter (i.e., a diameter of the mesh at its widest point) d1, and (ii) an implanted state (FIG. 1B) in which the mesh defines a second maximum transverse diameter d2 that is greater than the first transverse diameter.


For some applications, a percutaneously-advanceable delivery tool 30 is provided, via which implant 40 is injectable. For example, tool 30 may comprise a tubular member (e.g., a needle) 32 and a deployment mechanism 34 that applies a force to implant 40 that causes the implant to become exposed from the tubular member. For some applications, mesh 42 (e.g., strands 44 thereof) has shape memory, and is biased to assume its implanted state, e.g., such that (i) tool 30 retains the mesh in its delivery state while implant 40 is disposed within the tool, and (ii) the mesh automatically assumes its implanted state upon deployment from the tool. Alternatively, tool 30 may be configured to apply a force to the mesh, which drives the mesh toward its implanted state.


For some applications, and as shown, (i) a first end 48a of mesh 42 is attached to a first site of implant body 22, and remains attached to that first site while the mesh moves toward its implanted state, and (ii) a second end 48a of mesh 42 is attached to a second site of implant body 22, and remains attached to that second site while the mesh moves toward its implanted state. That is, the first and second ends of mesh 42 are fixedly attached to respective sites of implant body 22, and do not move during expansion of the mesh. These sites of the implant body are typically longitudinally between electrodes 24a and 24b.


Implant body 22 has a body diameter d3 transverse to axis ax1. Diameter d3 is typically constant along the length of implant body 22. Alternatively, diameter d3 may represent a diameter of implant body 22 at a portion of the implant body over which mesh 42 is disposed. For some applications, diameter d1 is 0.1-0.6 mm greater than diameter d3. For some applications, diameter d2 is 0.2-2 mm (e.g., 0.5-2 mm) greater than diameter d3. For some applications, diameter d2 is 0.2-2 mm (e.g., 0.5-2 mm) greater than diameter d1.


For some applications, mesh 42 inhibits movement of implant 40 within the tissue by providing mechanical anchoring (e.g., by increasing friction between the implant and the tissue), e.g., due to the mesh providing a relatively rough surface and/or due to the radial expansion of the mesh. For some applications, mesh 42 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, mesh 42 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.


For some applications, mesh 42, in its implanted state, separates tissue 10 (i.e., solid tissue) from implant body 22, thereby forming a pocket 50 into which blood (or component thereof) may enter, and within which tissue growth may occur, thereby further securing the implant within the tissue.


Reference is made to FIG. 2, which is a schematic illustration of an implant 60, comprising a mesh 62, disposed over implant body 22 of implant 60, in accordance with some applications of the invention. Mesh 62 is typically a fabric, such as a graft material (e.g., such as that used in stent grafts). For example, mesh 62 may comprise a polyethylene terephthalate fabric.


Typically, mesh 62 covers at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 70 percent) and/or less than 90 percent of valve body 22 of implant 60. That is, electrodes 24a and 24b define respective first and second portions of an external surface of implant 60, and mesh 62 defines a third portion of the external surface of the implant, the third portion having a surface area that is at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 70 percent) and/or less than 90 percent of the total surface area of the external surface.


For some applications, mesh 62 inhibits movement of implant 60 within the tissue by providing mechanical anchoring (e.g., by increasing friction between the implant and the tissue), e.g., due to the mesh providing a relatively rough surface. For some applications, mesh 62 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, mesh 62 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.


Reference is now made to FIG. 3, which is a schematic illustration of an implant 80, comprising implant 40 with a fabric 82 disposed over mesh 42, in accordance with some applications of the invention. As shown, for some applications mesh 42 is covered in fabric 82 (i.e., a fabric is disposed over segments 46 of strands 44). Fabric 82 is typically at least partly blood-permeable, and may comprise a natural fiber, or a synthetic fiber such as polyethylene terephthalate. For some applications, fabric 82 may be considered to be a mesh disposed over mesh 42. For some applications, the presence of fabric 82 insulates pocket 50 and/or promotes tissue growth therein.


Reference is again made to FIGS. 1A-B and 3. The part of mesh 42 that is the widest part of the mesh when the mesh is in its expanded state typically moves less than 1 mm along axis ax1 during expansion of the mesh from its compressed delivery state to its expanded implanted state. For some applications, that part of mesh doesn't move along axis ax1 at all. That is, for some applications, the anchor defined by mesh 42 expands radially without expanding or moving longitudinally.


Reference is made to FIGS. 4A-B, which are schematic illustrations of an implant 100, comprising an expanding frame 102 disposed over implant body 22, in accordance with some applications of the invention. Frame 102 comprises a plurality of articulating members 104, each having a first arm 106a and a second arm 106b, the arms articulatably coupled to each other at a joint 108. As shown in FIG. 4A, frame 102 has a delivery state (e.g., a contracted state) in which joint 108 is disposed at a first lateral distance d4 from implant body 22 (and may be in contact with the implant body). As shown in FIG. 4B, frame 102 also has an implanted state (e.g., an expanded state) in which joint 108 is disposed at a second lateral distance d5 from implant body 22. Distance d5 is greater than distance d4.


Typically, frame 102 comprises at least one cuff 110 attached to arm 106a of each articulating member, and slidable over implant body 22 between a first site (as shown in FIG. 4A) and a second site (as shown in FIG. 4B) of the implant body. When cuff 110 is at the first site, joint 108 is disposed at distance d4 from implant body 22, and when cuff 110 is at the second site, the joint is disposed at distance d5 from the implant body. Typically, the second site is between electrode 24a and electrode 24b. For some applications, and as shown, the first site is at an electrode 24 (e.g., such that when frame 102 is in the delivery state, cuff 110 covers an electrode 24). For some applications, both the first site and the second site are between electrode 24a and electrode 24b.


Typically, frame 102 defines at least one expanding portion 112 (FIGS. 4A-B show frame 102 defining two expanding portions 112), each expanding portion comprising a plurality of articulating members 104 (i) aligned parallel with the longitudinal axis of implant body 22, (i) disposed circumferentially around the axis, and (iii) attached to a cuff 110, such that movement of the cuff from the first site toward the second site causes articulation of all the articulating members 104 of the expanding portion 112. For some applications, arm 106b of each articulating member 104 is attached to another cuff 114, which may or may not also be slidable over implant body 22.


For some applications, frame 102 inhibits movement of implant 100 within tissue 10 by providing mechanical anchoring (e.g., by increasing friction between the implant and the tissue), e.g., due to the radial expansion of the frame. For some applications, frame 102 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, frame 102 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.


For some applications, frame 102, in its implanted state, separates tissue 10 (i.e., solid tissue) from implant body 22, thereby forming a pocket 118 into which blood (or component thereof) may enter, and within which tissue growth may occur, thereby further securing the implant within the tissue.


Reference is now made to FIG. 5, which is a schematic illustration of an implant 120, comprising implant 100 with a fabric 122 disposed over frame 102, in accordance with some applications of the invention. As shown, for some applications frame 102 is covered in fabric 122 (i.e., a fabric is disposed over at least articulating members 104 of expanding portions 112). Fabric 122 is typically at least partly blood-permeable, and may comprise a natural fiber, or a synthetic fiber such as polyethylene terephthalate. For some applications, fabric 122 may be considered to be a mesh disposed over frame 102. For some applications, fabric 122 is disposed over at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 70 percent) and/or less than 90 percent of valve body 22. For some applications, the presence of fabric 122 insulates pocket 118 and/or promotes tissue growth therein.


Reference is made to FIGS. 6A-C, which are schematic illustrations of an implant 140, comprising an anchor 142 that comprises a mesh 144, in accordance with some applications of the invention. Typically, mesh 144 is a braid of strands (e.g., wires), e.g., as described hereinabove, mutatis mutandis. For some applications, mesh 144 is metallic (i.e., its strands are metallic). For some applications, mesh 144 comprises a polymer (i.e., its strands comprise a polymer).


Segments of the strands overlap each other, and each strand (or a segment thereof) may helically curve at least partway around longitudinal axis ax1 of implant body 22. Unlike mesh 42 of implant 40, mesh 144 of implant 140 is disposed at and end of the implant, typically such that electrode 24a and electrode 24b are both disposed on the same side of anchor 142 (e.g., distally to the anchor). As for other implants described herein, implant 140 is delivered percutaneously using an implantation tool 150, which typically comprises tubular member 32 and a deployment mechanism 154. For some applications deployment mechanism 154 is similar to other deployment mechanisms described herein. Deployment mechanism 154 is reversibly coupled to implant 140 (e.g., to a proximal end of implant body 22 of implant 140).


As shown in FIG. 6A, in a delivery state of the apparatus, implant 140 is disposed within tubular member 32, and mesh 144 is tubular, and extends proximally from implant body 22, over at least a distal portion of deployment mechanism 154 (e.g., mesh 144 covers the site of coupling 152 between mechanism 154 and implant body 22). Tubular member 32 restrains mesh 144 in this shape. When implant 140 is deployed (e.g., by retracting tubular member 32 proximally while holding the implant still by applying a reference force via deployment mechanism 154), mesh 144 expands (e.g., automatically), becoming wider and shorter (e.g., forming anchor 142), and typically exposing the site of coupling between mechanism 154 and implant body (FIG. 6B). For some applications, implant 140 comprises a coupling 156 at one end of implant body 22, and mechanism 154 may comprise a complimentary coupling 158 that mates with coupling 156. For some applications, until mesh 144 exposes at least one of couplings 158 and 156, mesh 144 inhibits decoupling of coupling 158 from coupling 156.


Reference is made to FIGS. 7A-B, which are schematic illustrations of an implant 160, comprising an anchor 162 that comprises an expandable frame 164 covered in a fabric 166, in accordance with some applications of the invention. FIG. 7A shows implant 160 in isolation, and FIG. 7B shows the implant having been implanted in tissue 10, with anchor 162 in an implanted state (i.e., an expanded state). In contrast to other embodiments described herein, anchor 162 is disposed at an end of implant body 22, rather than being disposed over the implant body. However, in common with other embodiments described herein: (i) Fabric 166 is typically at least partly blood-permeable, and may comprise a natural fiber, or a synthetic fiber such as polyethylene terephthalate. (ii) For some applications, fabric 166 may be considered to be a mesh disposed over frame 164. (iii) For some applications, fabric 166 defines a pocket 168 into which blood (or component thereof) may enter, and within which tissue growth may occur, thereby further securing implant 160 within the tissue.


For some applications, anchor 162 comprises anchor 142 covered in fabric 166. For such applications, frame 164 comprises mesh 144.


Reference is made to FIG. 8, which is a schematic illustration of an implant 180 comprising a silicone anchoring material 182, in accordance with some applications of the invention. Typically, material 182 covers at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 70 percent) and/or less than 90 percent of valve body 22 of implant 180. That is, electrodes 24a and 24b define respective first and second portions of an external surface of implant 180, and material 182 defines a third portion of the external surface of the implant, the third portion having a surface area that is at least 50 percent (e.g., at least 70 percent) and/or less than 90 percent of the total surface area of the external surface. Silicone material 182 may comprise a silicone resin. Silicone material 182 may comprise a silicone rubber.


For some applications, silicone anchoring material 182 inhibits migration of implant 180 by increasing friction between the implant and tissue 10, e.g., due to the native characteristics (e.g., roughness) of the silicone material.


For some application, and as shown, silicone anchoring material 182 is shaped to define synthetic setae 184, e.g., generally resembling those of a gecko's feet. Setae 184 are typically 0.1-1 mm long. Setae 184 are typically 0.1-1 mm wide. Typically, silicone anchoring material 182 defines 1-100 (e.g., 10-100) setae per mm^2.


For some applications, each seta 184 is shaped to define a microscopic suction cup 186, e.g., at a distal end of the seta.


For some applications, silicone anchoring material 182 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, silicone anchoring material 182 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.


Reference is made to FIGS. 9A-B, which are schematic illustrations of an implant 200 comprising a flexible tail 202, in accordance with some applications of the invention. Tail 202 is coupled to implant body 22, and serves as an anchor for implant 200. Tail 202 (or at least part thereof) extends along axis ax1 away from implant body 22. It is to be noted that this description is intended to represent the general longitudinal appearance of implant 200, including body 22 and tail 202, and includes embodiments in which tail 22 curves away from axis ax1, either in the absence of forces thereon, or in the presence of such forces, e.g., during and/or after implantation. For some applications, tail 202 comprises silicone (in part, or entirely). For some applications, the silicone of tail 202 is shaped to define synthetic setae, e.g., as described with reference to FIG. 8, mutatis mutandis.


Tail 202 has a plurality of nodules 204 distributed therealong. So as to limit the maximum diameter of implant 200, each nodule typically has a diameter transverse to axis ax1 that is no greater than diameter d3 of implant body 22. Therefore tail 202 may alternatively or additionally be described as (i) having a diameter that is equal or less than diameter d3 of implant body 22, and (ii) defining a plurality of notches 206 distributed therealong, nodules 204 being defined as portions of tail 202 that are between notches 206.


Tail 202, and nodules 204 are typically not expandable. That is, unlike expanding anchors, such as barbs, nodules 204 typically have a fixed diameter d6 both during and after implantation.


For some applications, tail 202 inhibits migration of implant 180 by increasing friction between the implant and tissue 10. For some applications, tail 202 comprises and/or serves as a tissue-growth scaffold, promoting tissue growth, and thereby inhibiting migration of the implant. For some applications, tail 202 initially provides mechanical anchoring (e.g., only mechanical anchoring), and promotes tissue growth (e.g., fibrosis), so that over a subsequent duration (e.g., more than 1 day and/or less than 2 months, such as 1 day-2 months) tissue growth further inhibits migration of the implant.


Reference is made to FIGS. 10A-C, which are schematic illustrations of a system 221 comprising an implant 220, a delivery tool 230, and an adhesive 240, in accordance with some applications of the invention. Delivery tool 230 is similar to delivery tool 30, described hereinabove, and comprises a tubular member (e.g., a needle) 232 and deployment mechanism 34. Delivery tool 230 is configured to house implant 220, and to be percutaneously advanced into the subject.


Delivery tool 230 has one or more outlets 238, and an adhesive-dispensing mechanism 242 that is configured to dispense adhesive 240 out of the outlets. For example, tubular member 232 may be shaped to define one or more secondary lumens 236 that end at outlets 238, and mechanism 242 forces adhesive 240 (e.g., from a reservoir 246) through lumens 236.


For some applications, adhesive-dispensing mechanism 242 is functionally linked to implant-injection mechanism 244, such that adhesive-dispensing mechanism 242 dispenses adhesive 240 out of outlets 238 as implant-injection mechanism 244 deploys implant 220 out of distal opening 231. For example, operation of a single controller (e.g., a trigger) 248 may simultaneously dispense adhesive 240 out of outlets 238 and deploy implant 220 out of the distal opening.


It is to be noted that adhesive 240 may or may not comprise a substance that is conventionally regarded as an adhesive. For example, adhesive 240 may comprise a surgical adhesive and/or a bioadhesive. Alternatively or additionally, adhesive 240 may comprise a substance that triggers chemical changes that cause adherence of implant 220 to tissue 10. For example, adhesive 240 may comprise an enzyme, such as transglutaminase.


It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof that are not in the prior art, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.

Claims
  • 1. Apparatus, comprising: an electrostimulator implant; anda percutaneously-advanceable delivery tool via which the implant is injectable, wherein:the electrostimulator implant comprises: an implant body, the implant being injectable into tissue of a subject along a longitudinal axis of the implant body,first and second electrodes, disposed on respective first and second portions of the implant body;circuitry, disposed inside the implant body, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply current to the tissue; anda mesh: disposed over at least 50 percent of the implant body,configured to serve as an anchor of the implant,having a delivery state in which the mesh defines a first maximum transverse diameter, andhaving an implanted state in which the mesh defines a second maximum transverse diameter that is greater than the first transverse diameter,while the implant is disposed within the tool, the tool retains the mesh in the delivery state, and when the implant is deployed from the tool, the mesh automatically moves toward the implanted state, andthe mesh has (i) a first end that remains attached to a first site of the implant body while the mesh moves toward the implanted state, and (ii) a second end that remains attached to a second site of the implant body while the mesh moves toward the implanted state, the first site and the second site being disposed longitudinally between the first electrode and the second electrode.
  • 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh comprises a tissue-growth scaffold.
  • 3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh is disposed over a third portion of the implant body, the third portion being longitudinally between the first and second portions.
  • 4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh is disposed over at least 70 percent of the outer surface of the implant.
  • 5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh comprises polyethylene terephthalate.
  • 6. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh comprises a graft material.
  • 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh comprises braided strands.
  • 8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh is metallic.
  • 9. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh comprises a polymer.
  • 10. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh is a fabric.
  • 11. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh has shape memory.
  • 12. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mesh comprises a plurality of strand segments that each helically curve at least partway around the implant body and the longitudinal axis.
  • 13. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the strand segments overlap each other.
  • 14. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein each strand segment has a first end fixedly attached to a first site of the implant body, and a second end fixedly attached to a second site of the implant body.
  • 15. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the implant further comprises a fabric disposed over the plurality of strand segments.
US Referenced Citations (299)
Number Name Date Kind
3411507 Wingrove Nov 1968 A
3693625 Auphan Sep 1972 A
4019518 Maurer et al. Apr 1977 A
4338945 Kosugi et al. Jul 1982 A
4392496 Stanton Jul 1983 A
4535785 Van Den Honert Aug 1985 A
4559948 Liss et al. Dec 1985 A
4573481 Bullara Mar 1986 A
4585005 Lue et al. Apr 1986 A
4602624 Naples Jul 1986 A
4608985 Crish Sep 1986 A
4628942 Sweeney Dec 1986 A
4632116 Rosen Dec 1986 A
4649936 Ungar Mar 1987 A
4663102 Brenman et al. May 1987 A
4739764 Lue et al. Apr 1988 A
4808157 Coombs Feb 1989 A
4867164 Zabara Sep 1989 A
4926865 Oman May 1990 A
4962751 Krauter Oct 1990 A
5025807 Zabara Jun 1991 A
5069680 Grandjean Dec 1991 A
5178161 Kovacs Jan 1993 A
5188104 Wernicke Feb 1993 A
5199428 Obel et al. Apr 1993 A
5199430 Fang Apr 1993 A
5203326 Collins Apr 1993 A
5205285 Baker, Jr. Apr 1993 A
5215086 Terry, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5263480 Wernicke Nov 1993 A
5282468 Klepinski Feb 1994 A
5284479 De Jong Feb 1994 A
5292344 Douglas Mar 1994 A
5299569 Wernicke Apr 1994 A
5314495 Kovacs May 1994 A
5330507 Schwartz Jul 1994 A
5335657 Terry, Jr. Aug 1994 A
5411535 Fujii et al. May 1995 A
5423872 Cigaina Jun 1995 A
5439938 Snyder et al. Aug 1995 A
5454840 Krakovsky et al. Oct 1995 A
5487760 Villafana Jan 1996 A
5505201 Grill, Jr. Apr 1996 A
5540730 Terry, Jr. Jul 1996 A
5540733 Testerman et al. Jul 1996 A
5540734 Zabara Jul 1996 A
5549655 Erickson Aug 1996 A
5571150 Wernicke Nov 1996 A
5591216 Testerman et al. Jan 1997 A
5634462 Tyler et al. Jun 1997 A
5690681 Geddes et al. Nov 1997 A
5690691 Chen et al. Nov 1997 A
5700282 Zabara Dec 1997 A
5707400 Terry, Jr. Jan 1998 A
5711316 Elsberry et al. Jan 1998 A
5716385 Mittal Feb 1998 A
5755750 Petruska May 1998 A
5776170 Macdonald et al. Jul 1998 A
5776171 Peckham Jul 1998 A
5814089 Stokes Sep 1998 A
5824027 Hoffer et al. Oct 1998 A
5832932 Elsberry et al. Nov 1998 A
5833709 Rise et al. Nov 1998 A
5836994 Bourgeois Nov 1998 A
5861019 Sun et al. Jan 1999 A
5916239 Geddes et al. Jun 1999 A
5938584 Ardito et al. Aug 1999 A
5944680 Christopherson Aug 1999 A
5954758 Peckham Sep 1999 A
5991664 Seligman Nov 1999 A
6002964 Feler et al. Dec 1999 A
6026326 Bardy Feb 2000 A
6026328 Peckham Feb 2000 A
6032076 Melvin et al. Feb 2000 A
6058331 King et al. May 2000 A
6066163 John May 2000 A
6083249 Familoni Jul 2000 A
6086525 Davey et al. Jul 2000 A
6091977 Tarjan et al. Jul 2000 A
6091992 Bourgeois Jul 2000 A
6094598 Elsberry et al. Jul 2000 A
6097984 Douglas Aug 2000 A
6104955 Bourgeois Aug 2000 A
6104960 Duysens et al. Aug 2000 A
6119516 Hock Sep 2000 A
6146335 Gozani Nov 2000 A
6148232 Avrahami Nov 2000 A
6169924 Meloy et al. Jan 2001 B1
6205359 Boveja Mar 2001 B1
6212435 Lattner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214032 Loeb et al. Apr 2001 B1
6230061 Hartung May 2001 B1
6240316 Richmond May 2001 B1
6266564 Hill et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272383 Grey Aug 2001 B1
6292703 Meier et al. Sep 2001 B1
6319241 King Nov 2001 B1
6332089 Acker Dec 2001 B1
6341236 Osorio et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345202 Richmond et al. Feb 2002 B2
6356784 Lozano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356788 Boveja Mar 2002 B2
6366813 Dilorenzo Apr 2002 B1
6405079 Ansarinia Jun 2002 B1
6442432 Lee Aug 2002 B2
6445953 Bulkes et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449507 Hill et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456878 Yerich et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463328 John Oct 2002 B1
6473644 Terry, Jr. et al. Oct 2002 B1
6493585 Plicchi et al. Dec 2002 B2
6496729 Thompson Dec 2002 B2
6496730 Kleckner et al. Dec 2002 B1
6582441 He et al. Jun 2003 B1
6600954 Cohen Jul 2003 B2
6600956 Maschino et al. Jul 2003 B2
6606521 Paspa et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610713 Tracey Aug 2003 B2
6618627 Lattner et al. Sep 2003 B2
6641542 Cho et al. Nov 2003 B2
6682480 Habib et al. Jan 2004 B1
6735474 Loeb et al. May 2004 B1
6770022 Mechlenburg Aug 2004 B2
6829508 Schulman Dec 2004 B2
6839594 Cohen Jan 2005 B2
6892098 Ayal May 2005 B2
6907295 Gross et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909917 Woods et al. Jun 2005 B2
7025730 Cho et al. Apr 2006 B2
7027860 Bruninga et al. Apr 2006 B2
7047076 Li et al. May 2006 B1
7054692 Whitehurst et al. May 2006 B1
7149575 Ostroff et al. Dec 2006 B2
7177698 Klosterman et al. Feb 2007 B2
7212867 Van Venrooij et al. May 2007 B2
7228178 Carroll Jun 2007 B2
7277749 Gordon et al. Oct 2007 B2
7289853 Campbell et al. Oct 2007 B1
7324852 Barolat et al. Jan 2008 B2
7324853 Ayal Jan 2008 B2
7483752 Von arx et al. Jan 2009 B2
7502652 Gaunt et al. Mar 2009 B2
7532932 Denker et al. May 2009 B2
7536226 Williams May 2009 B2
7628750 Cohen Dec 2009 B2
7630771 Cauller Dec 2009 B2
7634313 Kroll et al. Dec 2009 B1
7655014 Ko et al. Feb 2010 B2
7657311 Bardy et al. Feb 2010 B2
7657322 Bardy et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660632 Kirby et al. Feb 2010 B2
7680538 Durand et al. Mar 2010 B2
7711434 Denker et al. May 2010 B2
7736379 Ewers et al. Jun 2010 B2
7780625 Bardy Aug 2010 B2
7797050 Libbus et al. Sep 2010 B2
7848818 Barolat et al. Dec 2010 B2
7917226 Nghiem Mar 2011 B2
7937148 Jacobson May 2011 B2
7941218 Sambelashvili et al. May 2011 B2
7974706 Moffitt et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991467 Markowitz et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996089 Haugland et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996092 Mrva et al. Aug 2011 B2
8019443 Schleicher et al. Sep 2011 B2
8055350 Roberts Nov 2011 B2
8075556 Betts Dec 2011 B2
8090438 Bardy et al. Jan 2012 B2
8115448 John Feb 2012 B2
8131377 Shi et al. Mar 2012 B2
8170675 Alataris et al. May 2012 B2
8177792 Lubock et al. May 2012 B2
8185207 Molnar et al. May 2012 B2
8209021 Alataris et al. Jun 2012 B2
8224453 De Ridder Jul 2012 B2
8255057 Fang et al. Aug 2012 B2
8355792 Alataris et al. Jan 2013 B2
8359102 Alataris et al. Jan 2013 B2
8359103 Alataris et al. Jan 2013 B2
8396559 Alataris et al. Mar 2013 B2
8428748 Alataris et al. Apr 2013 B2
8463404 Levi et al. Jun 2013 B2
8509905 Alataris et al. Aug 2013 B2
8509906 Walker et al. Aug 2013 B2
8554326 Alataris et al. Oct 2013 B2
8634927 Olson et al. Jan 2014 B2
8649874 Alataris et al. Feb 2014 B2
8694108 Alataris et al. Apr 2014 B2
8694109 Alataris et al. Apr 2014 B2
8712533 Alataris et al. Apr 2014 B2
8718781 Alataris et al. May 2014 B2
8718782 Alataris et al. May 2014 B2
8755893 Gross et al. Jun 2014 B2
8768472 Fang et al. Jul 2014 B2
8774926 Alataris et al. Jul 2014 B2
8788045 Gross et al. Jul 2014 B2
8792988 Alataris et al. Jul 2014 B2
8849410 Walker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8862239 Alataris et al. Oct 2014 B2
8868192 Alataris et al. Oct 2014 B2
8874217 Alataris et al. Oct 2014 B2
8874221 Alataris et al. Oct 2014 B2
8874222 Alataris et al. Oct 2014 B2
8880177 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 B2
8886326 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 B2
8886327 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 B2
8886328 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 B2
8892209 Alataris et al. Nov 2014 B2
20020077554 Schwartz et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099419 Cohen et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020124848 Sullivan et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030040774 Terry et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030060858 Kieval et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030100933 Ayal May 2003 A1
20030176898 Gross et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040015205 Whitehurst et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019368 Lattner et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040048795 Ivanova et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073270 Firlik et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040167584 Carroll et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040249431 Ransbury Dec 2004 A1
20040254624 Johnson Dec 2004 A1
20050131495 Parramon et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143789 Whitehurst et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165457 Benser et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060100668 Ben-David et al. May 2006 A1
20060155345 Williams et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060271137 Stanton-Hicks Nov 2006 A1
20070032827 Katims Feb 2007 A1
20070067000 Strother et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067007 Schulman Mar 2007 A1
20070073354 Knudson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070173893 Pitts Jul 2007 A1
20080009914 Buysman Jan 2008 A1
20080021336 Dobak Jan 2008 A1
20080027513 Carbunaru Jan 2008 A1
20080039915 Van Den Biggelaar Feb 2008 A1
20080103407 Bolea et al. May 2008 A1
20080103572 Gerber May 2008 A1
20080119911 Rosero May 2008 A1
20080132964 Cohen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080269740 Bonde et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090012590 Inman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036975 Ward et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048642 Goroszeniuk Feb 2009 A1
20090149912 Dacey et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090152954 Le et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090204170 Hastings et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204173 Fang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090270951 Kallmyer Oct 2009 A1
20090281594 King et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090326602 Glukhovsky et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100094367 Sen Apr 2010 A1
20100121405 Ternes et al. May 2010 A1
20100125310 Wilson et al. May 2010 A1
20100125313 Lee et al. May 2010 A1
20100198298 Glukhovsky et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211131 Williams et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100241195 Meadows et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249875 Kishawi et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100280568 Bulkes et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100305392 Gross et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100312320 Faltys et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100324630 Lee et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110034782 Sugimachi et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110046696 Barolat et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110087337 Forsell Apr 2011 A1
20110093036 Mashiach Apr 2011 A1
20110137365 Ben-Ezra et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110152965 Mashiach Jun 2011 A1
20110160793 Gindele Jun 2011 A1
20110160798 Ackermann et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110208260 Jacobson Aug 2011 A1
20110208271 Dobak Aug 2011 A1
20110224744 Moffitt et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110270339 Murray, III et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282412 Glukhovsky et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110301670 Gross et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120010694 Lutter et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120035679 Dagan et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120041511 Lee Feb 2012 A1
20120041514 Gross et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120065701 Cauller Mar 2012 A1
20120083857 Bradley et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120101326 Simon et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120123498 Gross May 2012 A1
20120130448 Woods et al. May 2012 A1
20120130463 Ben-David et al. May 2012 A1
20120158081 Gross et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120296389 Fang et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130006326 Ackermann et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130066393 Gross et al. Mar 2013 A1
20140214134 Peterson Jul 2014 A1
20150004709 Nazarpoor Jan 2015 A1
20150018728 Gross et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150080979 Lasko et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150258339 Burchiel et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150335882 Gross et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160206882 Oron et al. Jul 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
102008054403 Jun 2010 DE
0 688 577 Dec 1995 EP
1533000 May 2005 EP
9810832 Mar 1998 WO
9926530 Jun 1999 WO
0110375 Feb 2001 WO
0110432 Feb 2001 WO
0126729 Apr 2001 WO
0209808 Feb 2002 WO
2004064729 Aug 2004 WO
2006102626 Sep 2006 WO
2007019491 Feb 2007 WO
2009055574 Apr 2009 WO
2009110935 Sep 2009 WO
2011154937 Dec 2011 WO
2012012591 Jan 2012 WO
2013035092 Mar 2013 WO
2013106884 Jul 2013 WO
2013111137 Aug 2013 WO
2013156038 Oct 2013 WO
2013164829 Nov 2013 WO
2014087337 Jun 2014 WO
2016172109 Oct 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (86)
Entry
Kucklick, Theodore R., ed. The medical device R&D handbook. Chapter 3—Intro to needles and cannulae. CRC Press, 2012.
An Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/735,741.
A. Oliven, Electrical stimulation of the genioglossus to improve pharyngeal patency in obstructive sleep apnea: comparison of resultsobtained during sleep and anesthesia, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health May 2009;148(5):315-9, 350, 349—an abstract.
Mortimer et al., Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Stimulation, Neuroprosthetics Theory and Practice, Chapter 4.2, 2004, p. 632-638.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 29, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2013/050069.
Zabara J., Inhibition of experimental seizures in canines by repetitive vagal stimulation, Epilepsia. Nov.-Dec. 1992;33 (6):1005-12, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1464256—an abstract.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Apr. 29, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IB2013/060607.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Jul. 11, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2013/050069.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 9, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IB2013/060607.
A Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,433.
A Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,102.
An Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,433.
Shealy (1967) Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns.
Nov. 30, 2015 massdevice.com—St. Jude Medical's Proclaim Elite debuts in Europe.
Kaplan et al. (2009) Design and fabrication of an injection tool for neuromuscular microstimulators.
Supplementary European Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European App No. 11792044.7.
An Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/226,723.
Lind (2012) Advances in spinal cord stimulation.
Physical Therapy Web.com—Interferential Current (IFC) Equipment.
electrotherapy.org—Interferential Therapy.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/985,353, filed Nov. 5, 2007.
DJOGlobal.com—Interferential Current Therapy (IFC).
Brindley (1983) A technique for anodally blocking large nerve fibers.
Robert Szmurlo, Jacek Starzynski, Stanislaw Wincenciak, Andrzej Rysz, (2009) “Numerical model of vagus nerve electrical stimulation”, COMPEL—The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, vol. 28 Iss: 1, pp. 211-220.
Filiz, Sinan, et al. “Micromilling of microbarbs for medical implants.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 48.3 (2008): 459-472.
UCLA Team Reports Initial Success with Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation epilepsy. https://web.archive.org/web/20121020145122/https:/www.epilepsy.com/epilepsy/newsletter/apr09—STIM.
C. de Balthasar, G. Cosendai, M. Hansen, D. Canfield, L. Chu, R. Davis, and J. Schulman, “Attachment of leads to RF-BION® microstimulators.” Jul. 2005.
D.W. Eisele, A.R. Schwartz, and P.L. Smith, “Tongue neuromuscular and direct hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.,” Otolaryngologic clinics of North America, vol. 36, 2003, p. 501.
G.E. Loeb, F.J.R. Richmond, J. Singh, R.A. Peck, W. Tan, Q. Zou, and N. Sachs, “RF-powered BIONs™ for stimulation and sensing,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS'04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2005, pp. 4182-4185.
G.E. Loeb, F.J. Richmond, and L.L. Baker, “The BION devices: injectable interfaces with peripheral nerves and muscles,” Neurosurgical focus, vol. 20, 2006, pp. 1-9.
E.A. Mann, T. Burnett, S. Cornell, and C.L. Ludlow, “The effect of neuromuscular stimulation of the genioglossus on the hypopharyngeal airway,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 112, 2002, pp. 351-356.
A. Oliven, R.P. Schnall, G. Pillar, N. Gavriely, and M. Odeh, “Sublingual electrical stimulation of the tongue during wakefulness and sleep,” Respiration physiology, vol. 127, 2001, pp. 217-226.
A. Oliven, D.J. O'Hearn, A. Boudewyns, M. Odeh, W. De Backer, P. van de Heyning, P.L. Smith, D.W. Eisele, L. Allan, H. Schneider, and others, “Upper airway response to electrical stimulation of the genioglossus in obstructive sleep apnea,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 95, 2003, p. 2023.
A. Oliven, M. Odeh, L. Geitini, R. Oliven, U. Steinfeld, A.R. Schwartz, and N. Tov, “Effect of coactivation of tongue protrusor and retractor muscles on pharyngeal lumen and airflow in sleep apnea patients,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 103, 2007, p. 1662.
A.R. Schwartz, D.W. Eisele, A. Hari, R. Testerman, D. Erickson, and P.L. Smith, “Electrical stimulation of the lingual musculature in obstructive sleep apnea,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 81, 1996, p. 643.
W.H. Tran, G.E. Loeb, F.J.R. Richmond, A.C. Dupont, K.C. Mahutte, C.S.H. Sassoon, and M.J. Dickel, “Development of asynchronous, intralingual electrical stimulation to treat obstructive sleep apnea,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2003. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2004, pp. 375-378.
W.H. Tran, G.E. Loeb, F.J.R. Richmond, R. Ahmed, G.T. Clark, and P.B. Haberman, “First subject evaluated with simulated BION™ treatment in genioglossus to prevent obstructive sleep apnea,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS'04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2005, pp. 4287-4289.
P.R. Troyk, “Injectable electronic identification, monitoring, and stimulation systems,” Biomedical Engineering, vol. 1, 1999, p. 177.
T.K. Whitehurst, J.H. Schulman, K.N. Jaax, and R. Carbunaru, “The Bion® Microstimulator and its Clinical Applications,” Implantable Neural Prostheses 1, 2009, pp. 253-273.
D.J. Young, “Wireless powering and data telemetry for biomedical implants,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2009, pp. 3221-3224.
Reid R. Harrison, et al., “Wireless Neural Recording with Single Low-Power Integrated Circuit”, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. Aug. 2009; 17(4): 322-329.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Apr. 17, 2012 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL11/00870.
Patents Galore: Implantable Neurostimulators Fight Snoring and Corpse Eye-Proof Scanners. Printout from http://medgadget.com/2006/03/patents—galore.html (Downloaded Jan. 2012).
Chris Seper, “Neuros Medical Launches to Develop New Device to Block Amputee, Chronic Pain”, Mar. 16, 2009.
Urgent® PC, Simple. Safe. Effective. Neuromodulation System, Uroplasty, Mar. 2009.
“JumpStart and Case Technology Ventures Invest in Neuros Medical”, CTV Case Technology Ventures, Mar. 17, 2009.
“Responses to median and tibial nerve stimulation in patients with chronic neuropathic pain”, by Theuvenet, Brain Topography, vol. 11, No. 4, 1999, pp. 305-313(9)—an abstract.
Armstrong, J, “Is electrical stimulation effective in reducing neuropathic pain in patients with diabetes?”, by Foot Ankle Surg. Jul.-Aug. 1997; 36(4): 260-3—an abstract.
Ross Davis, Cerebellar Stimulation for Cerebral Palsy Spasticity, Function and Seizures. Clinical Neuroscience Center, 1999. pp. 290-299.
An Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2004, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 10/254,024.
Bathien et al., Inhibition and synchronisation of tremor induced by a muscle twitch. J. Neurol, Neurosurg. and Psych. 1980, 43, 713-718.
Jobges et al., Vibratory proprioceptive stimulation affects Parkinsonian tremor. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 8(3), 171-176, Jan. 2002.
Mones and Weiss, The response of the tremor of patients with Parkinsonism to peripheral nerve stimulation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 1969, 32. 512-519.
Y. Zhang, et al., “Optimal Ventricular Rate Slowing During Atrial Fibrillation by Feedback AV Nodal-Selective Vagal Stimulation”, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282:H1102-H1110, 2002.
N.J.M Rijkhoff, et al., “Selective Stimulation of Small Diameter Nerve Fibers in a Mixed Bundle”, Proceedings of the Annual Project Meeting Sensations/Neuros and Mid Term Review Meeting Neuros, Apr. 21-23, 1999.
M. Manfredi, “Differential Block of conduction of larger fibers in peripheral nerve by direct current”, Arch. Ital. Biol. 108:52-71, 1970.
A Restriction Requirement dated May 11, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/946,246.
Cerebral Palsy, Barry S. Russman MD, CCurrent Science Inc. 2000.
A Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 7, 2005, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 10/254,024.
A Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 26, 2004, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 10/254,024.
An Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,102.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Nov. 14, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000440.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 10, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000440.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/263,834, filed Jan. 2, 2001.
Sweeney JD et al., “An asymmetric two electrode cuff for generation of unidirectionally propagated action potentials,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-33(6) (1986).
An Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,102.
Invitation to pay Additional Fees dated May 10, 2013 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2013/005069.
Naples GG et al., “A spiral nerve cuff electrode for peripheral nerve stimulation,” by IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 35(11) (1988).
Sweeney JD et al., “A nerve cuff technique for selective excitation of peripheral nerve trunk regions,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 37(7) (1990).
Ungar Ij et al., “Generation of unidirectionally propagating action potentials using a monopolar electrode cuff,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 14:437-450 (1986).
Fitzpatrick et al., in “A nerve cuff design for the selective activation and blocking of myelinated nerve fibers,” Ann. Conf. of the IEEE Eng. in Medicine and Biology Soc, 13(2), 906 (1991).
Rijkhoff NJ et al., “Orderly recruitment of motoneurons in an acute rabbit model,” Ann. Conf. of the IEEE Eng., Medicine and Biology Soc., 20(5):2564 (1998).
Van den Honert C et al., “A technique for collision block of peripheral nerve: Frequency dependence,” MP-12, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 28:379-382 (1981).
Baratta R et al., “Orderly stimulation of skeletal muscle motor units with tripolar nerve cuff electrode,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 36(8):836-43 (1989).
Van den Honert C et al., “Generation of unidirectionally propagated action potentials in a peripheral nerve by brief stimuli,” Science, 206:1311-1312 (1979).
M. Devor, “Pain Networks”, Handbook of Brand Theory and Neural Networks, Ed M.A. Arbib MIT Press pp. 696-701, 1998.
Epilepsy center. http://www.bcm.tmc.edu/neural/struct/epilep/epilpsy—vagus.html. May 31, 2011 (2 Versions).
J.F. Cortese, “Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Control of Intractable Epileptic Seizures”, May 31, 2001.
Evetovich T.K. et al., Gender comparisons of the mechanomyographic responses to minimal concentric and eccentric isokinetic muscle actions, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1998 pp. 1697-1702. Abstract.
An Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,433.
An Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,102.
Chow et al., Evaluation of Cardiovascular Stents as Antennas for Implantable Wireless Applications, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, No. 10, Oct. 2009.
Dean, J. et al., “Motor Pattern Generation”, Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, pp. 696-701.
Hu et al., Percutaneous Biphasic Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Jan. 2008 vol. 55 Issue:1 p. 181-187—an abstract.
Extended European Search Report issued in EP16196878.9 on Feb. 3, 2017.
An Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,626.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170136232 A1 May 2017 US