Injectable flexible interspinous process device system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8814908
  • Patent Number
    8,814,908
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 26, 2010
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 26, 2014
    11 years ago
Abstract
An injectable, flexible interspinous process device and a delivery system. The interspinous process device is flexible and can be fillable in situ with a desired amount of biocompatible material. The interspinous process device has a container portion. A support element, such as a self-expanding mesh, is used in conjunction with the container to provide added structural support. The mesh also facilitates deployment of the device when it is properly positioned. A conduit may be coupled to the interspinous process to fill the device. A delivery system is also provided for delivering the flexible interspinous process device to the desired location. The delivery system includes an outer catheter that is disposed over the interspinous process device to maintain it in the undeployed state and thus facilitate delivery of the device to the desired location. An inner removable sleeve and a guidewire may also be used with the delivery system.
Description
BACKGROUND

This invention relates generally to the treatment of spinal conditions, and more particularly, to the treatment of spinal stenosis using devices for implantation between adjacent spinous processes.


The spine is divided into regions that include the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacrococcygeal regions. The cervical region includes the top seven vertebrae identified as C1-C7. The thoracic region includes the next twelve vertebrae identified as T1-T12. The lumbar region includes five vertebrae L1-L5. The sacrococcygeal region includes nine fused vertebrae that make up the sacrum and the coccyx. The vertebrae of the sacrum are identified as the S1-S5 vertebrae. Four or five rudimentary members form the coccyx.


The clinical syndrome of neurogenic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis is a frequent source of pain in the lower back and extremities, leading to impaired walking, and causing other forms of disability in the elderly. Although the incidence and prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis have not been established, this condition is the most frequent indication of spinal surgery in patients older than 65 years of age.


Lumbar spinal stenosis is a condition of the spine characterized by a narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal. With spinal stenosis, the spinal canal narrows and pinches the spinal cord and nerves, causing pain in the back and legs. It is estimated that approximately 5 in 10,000 people develop lumbar spinal stenosis each year. For patients who seek the aid of a physician for back pain, approximately 12%-15% are diagnosed as having lumbar spinal stenosis.


Common treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis include physical therapy (including changes in posture), medication, and occasionally surgery. Changes in posture and physical therapy may be effective in flexing the spine to decompress and enlarge the space available to the spinal cord and nerves—thus relieving pressure on pinched nerves. Medications such as NSAIDS and other anti-inflammatory medications are often used to alleviate pain, although they are not typically effective at addressing spinal compression, which is the cause of the pain.


Surgical treatments are more aggressive than medication or physical therapy, and in appropriate cases surgery may be the best way to achieve lessening of the symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis. The principal goal of surgery is to decompress the central spinal canal and the neural foramina, creating more space and eliminating pressure on the spinal nerve roots. The most common surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis is direct decompression via a laminectomy and partial facetectomy. In this procedure, the patient is given a general anesthesia and an incision is made in the patient to access the spine. The lamina of one or more vertebrae is removed to create more space for the nerves. The intervertebral disc may also be removed, and the adjacent vertebrae may be fused to strengthen the unstable segments. The success rate of decompressive laminectomy has been reported to be in excess of 65%. A significant reduction of the symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis is also achieved in many of these cases.


Alternatively, the vertebrae can be distracted and an interspinous process device implanted between adjacent spinous processes of the vertebrae to maintain the desired separation between the vertebral segments. Such interspinous process devices typically work for their intended purposes but they could be improved. Current devices for spacing adjacent interspinous processes are typically preformed, and are not customizable for different sizes and dimensions of the anatomy of an interspinous space of an actual patient. Instead, preformed devices of an approximately correct size are inserted into the interspinous space of the patient. Unfortunately, because of individual differences in patient anatomy, it is possible that such preformed devices may not comfortably fit in the interspinous space. Moreover, current devices may be difficult to implant because of the tissue obstructing the interspinous space. The necessity to have a configuration for current devices that ensures that the device remains in the proper location may also make it difficult to implant the device in a minimally invasive or percutaneous manner. Further, current devices are relatively stiff, which may cause subsidence in the spinous processes contacting the device after implantation. Thus a need exists for improvements to surgical spacers, such as those for spacing adjacent interspinous processes.


SUMMARY

An injectable, flexible interspinous process device is described herein. The interspinous process device is flexible and can be fillable in situ with a desired amount of material such as a biocompatible fluid. In addition, the interspinous process device is substantially impervious to the material with which it will be filled, although the interspinous process device may be permeable to other materials if desired. The interspinous process device is formed from an outer container portion and contains a supporting element such as a mesh or tube that provides added structural support to the container. The supporting element may be self-expanding to facilitate expansion of the device in situ. The supporting element may be located adjacent to an inner surface of the container, although it may be located within the container material itself or bonded to the outer surface of the container material.


As mentioned above, the supporting element may be self expanding so that once the interspinous process device is delivered to the desired position and any constraints removed, the interspinous process device will be deployed to its desired final configuration. The interspinous process device may then be filled with a suitable material such as a biocompatible fluid or a material that is in a liquid state when the interspinous process device is being filled but cures to a more viscous, or generally solid state after the interspinous process device is filled. The interspinous process device has a deployed configuration that includes a central spacer portion that is adapted to be disposed in the interspinous space and enlarged proximal and distal portions that prevent the interspinous process device from moving proximally or distally out of the interspinous process space.


A conduit is coupled to the interspinous process device and is long enough so that it can extend from the interspinous process device to a position outside of the patient to allow for easy manipulation by the surgeon. The conduit thus allows the interspinous process device to be filled with the desired filler material. A breakaway seal may be formed at the interface of the conduit and the interspinous process device. Alternatively, a valve may be located at that location. With either embodiment, the surgeon can inject a material into the interspinous process device to provide the device with its desired final flexibility characteristic and then remove the conduit from the interspinous process device without the injected material flowing back out of the interspinous process device.


A delivery system is also provided for delivering the flexible interspinous process device described above to a desired location. The interspinous process device is in an undeployed, low profile state when it is delivered to the desired location. The delivery system includes an outer catheter that is disposed over the interspinous process device to maintain it in the undeployed state and thus facilitate delivery of the device to the desired location in a minimally invasive or percutaneous manner. If desired, a guidewire may be used to provide a track along which the delivery device can be advanced to simplify the delivery of the interspinous process device to the desired location. Alternatively, the delivery device may include a steerable catheter to facilitate delivery of the interspinous process device to the desired location. The delivery system may also include an outer cannula disposed about the outer catheter. The outer cannula provides added protection to the container to prevent damage to the container during delivery of the interspinous process device through the patient's anatomy to the desired location in the spine. The outer cannula may be relatively stiff. This allows the surgeon to push against the delivery system and facilitates the movement of the delivery system through the patient's anatomy.


In addition, an inner retractable sleeve may be located inside the interspinous process device to hold the supporting element in an undeployed configuration and allows the surgeon to control the deployment of the supporting element once the interspinous process device is located in the desired position. Of course, where the supporting element is located within the material of the container, or bonded to the container, the inner sleeve may not be needed. However, in such an arrangement, the container material for the interspinous process device should be strong enough to resist tearing when the supporting element becomes unconstrained and is allowed to deploy. Where an inner sleeve and/or guidewire is used with the delivery system, the proximal end of the interspinous process device has a self sealing feature that allows the inner sleeve and/or guidewire to be removed without compromising the fluid-tight integrity of the device.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a rear perspective view of an undeployed flexible interspinous process device and delivery system and a portion of a spine on which the flexible interspinous process device is to be located;



FIG. 1B is a rear perspective view of a deployed flexible interspinous process device and a portion of a spine on which it is located;



FIG. 2A is a perspective view of the flexible interspinous device and delivery system shown in FIG. 1A, partially expanded for clarity;



FIG. 2B is an exploded, perspective view of the flexible interspinous process device and delivery system shown in FIG. 2A;



FIG. 3A is a cross-sectional view of an interspinous process device and delivery system, partially expanded for clarity;



FIG. 3B is a cross-sectional view of the interspinous process device and the delivery system shown in FIG. 3A with the outer catheter removed from around the interspinous process device;



FIG. 3C is a cross-sectional view of the interspinous process device and the delivery system shown in FIG. 3A with the outer and inner catheters removed from the interspinous process device;



FIG. 3D is a cross-sectional view of a fully deployed interspinous process device that is located between two spinous processes;



FIG. 3E is a cross-sectional view of a fully deployed interspinous process device that is located between two spinous processes and that has a fill tube removably attached to the interspinous process device;



FIG. 3F is a cross-sectional view of a fully deployed interspinous process device that has been filled with a fluid; and



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the interspinous process device and delivery system shown in FIG. 3A taken along line IV-IV.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, the term “a member” is intended to mean a single member or a combination of members, and “a material” is intended to mean one or more materials, or a combination thereof. Furthermore, the words “proximal” and “distal” refer to directions closer to and away from, respectively, an operator (e.g., surgeon, physician, nurse, technician, etc.) who would insert the medical device into the patient, with the tip-end (i.e., distal end) of the device inserted inside a patient's body first. Thus, for example, the device end first inserted inside the patient's body would be the distal end of the device, while the device end last to enter the patient's body would be the proximal end of the device.


As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “body” when used in connection with the location where the device of this invention is to be placed to treat lumbar spinal stenosis, or to teach or practice implantation methods for the device, means a mammalian body or a model of a mammalian body. For example, a body can be a patient's body, or a cadaver, or a portion of a patient's body or a portion of a cadaver or a model of any of the foregoing.


As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “parallel” describes a relationship, given normal manufacturing or measurement or similar tolerances, between two geometric constructions (e.g., two lines, two planes, a line and a plane, two curved surfaces, a line and a curved surface or the like) in which the two geometric constructions are substantially non-intersecting as they extend substantially to infinity. For example, as used herein, a line is said to be parallel to a curved surface when the line and the curved surface do not intersect as they extend to infinity. Similarly, when a planar surface (i.e., a two-dimensional surface) is said to be parallel to a line, every point along the line is spaded apart from the nearest portion of the surface by a substantially equal distance. Two geometric constructions are described herein as being “parallel” or “substantially parallel” to each other when they are nominally parallel to each other, such as for example, when they are parallel to each other within a tolerance. Such tolerances can include, for example, manufacturing tolerances, measurement tolerances or the like.


As used in this specification and the appended claims, the terms “normal”, “perpendicular” and “orthogonal” describe a relationship between two geometric constructions (e.g., two lines, two planes, a line and a plane, two curved surfaces, a line and a curved surface or the like) in which the two geometric constructions intersect at an angle of approximately 90 degrees within at least one plane. For example, as used herein, a line is said to be normal, perpendicular or orthogonal to a curved surface when the line and the curved surface intersect at an angle of approximately 90 degrees within a plane. Two geometric constructions are described herein as being “normal”, “perpendicular”, “orthogonal” or “substantially normal”, “substantially perpendicular”, “substantially orthogonal” to each other when they are nominally 90 degrees to each other, such as for example, when they are 90 degrees to each other within a tolerance. Such tolerances can include, for example, manufacturing tolerances, measurement tolerances or the like.


An injectable, flexible interspinous process device is described herein. The interspinous process device 100 includes a container 110, which is flexible and can be fillable in situ with a desired amount of material, such as a biocompatible fluid. Container 110 may be formed from a flexible material that may be compliant or non-compliant. The material may also be tear resistant. The material may also be substantially fluid impermeable so that the material that is used to fill container 110 will not leak from container 110. For example, container 110 may be formed from a silicone material provided by NuSil Technology LLC. Other silicone and polymeric materials may also be used to form container 110. In addition to being flexible, tear resistant and fluid impermeable, the material used to form container 110 may be self-sealing to allow elements of a delivery system or other elements of interspinous process device 100 to be inserted in and removed from container 110 without permanently compromising the fluid impermeable nature of the material that forms container 110.


Container 110 is formed from a flexible material so that it can be folded in a first configuration having a low profile and unfolded into a second configuration having a larger profile. In its low profile configuration, container 110 should have a cross-section that allows it to be inserted into the interspinous space with minimal disruption to the surrounding tissue. Thus, container 110 may be delivered in a minimally invasive or percutaneous manner to the desired location in the anatomy. Container 110 has a proximal portion, a distal portion and a medial portion. In the first, low profile configuration, container 110 is folded such that the proximal portion, the medial portion and the distal portion have substantially the same height. In the second, larger profile configuration, see e.g. FIG. 3F, the proximal portion and distal portion each has a height that is larger than the height of the medial portion. This allows the proximal portion and the distal portion of container 110 to extend along at least a portion of the height of each of the two adjacent spinous processes between which container 110 is implanted. The medial portion has a height that maintains the desired space between the two adjacent spinous process between which container 110 is implanted.


Interspinous process device 100 also includes a support member 120 that may be formed as a mesh or tube and that may be self-expanding. Support member 120 may be formed from a metallic material and may be a shape memory material. Support member 120 may extend along the medial portion. Support member 120 has a generally tubular deployed configuration that generally matches the configuration of the medial portion when container 110 is deployed. If desired, support member 120 may also extend along the proximal and distal portions. In this case, support member 120 would have an enlarged proximal portion and an enlarged distal portion that would generally match the overall configuration of container 110, including its proximal and distal portions, when container 110 is deployed. The use of a metallic support member also helps the surgeon visualize the location of interspinous process device under fluoroscopy.


Support member 120 is located inside and adjacent to the inner surface of container 110, although it may be located within the container material itself such that support member 120 may be located within the sidewall container 110. In addition, support member may be bonded to the outside surface of container 110. With self expanding support member 120 contacting container 110, support member 120 moves the medial portion to its unfolded, larger profile configuration, as well as the proximal and distal portions if support member 120 extends along the proximal and distal portions. Container 110 may then be filled with a suitable material such as a biocompatible fluid or a material that is initially a liquid and then cures to a more viscous state or to a solid state. Thus, container 110 may be easily filled and then when the filler material cures, container 110, along with support member 120, will provide adequate support between the two adjacent spinous processes to maintain the desired distraction therebetween. In addition, when the proximal portion and the distal portion are in their unfolded configurations and filled with the filler material, the proximal portion and distal portion prevent the interspinous process device 100 from moving proximally or distally out of the interspinous process space. The volume of material injected into container 110 may be varied to vary the stiffness/flexibility of medial portion 113 as determined by the surgeon.


A conduit 130 is coupled to container 110 and is long enough so that it can extend from container 110 to a position outside of the patient to allow for easy manipulation by the surgeon. Conduit 130 allows container 110 to be filled with the desired flowable material. A breakaway seal may be formed at the interface of conduit 130 and container 110 or a valve 400 may be located at that position. Alternatively, the fillable material may seal the interface between container 110 and conduit 130 when the fillable material cures. In such an embodiment, conduit 130 is connected to container 110 with a frangible connection and no seal. With any of the foregoing embodiments, the surgeon can inject a flowable material into interspinous process device 100 to provide the device with its desired final flexibility characteristic and remove conduit 130 from interspinous process device 100 without the injected material flowing back out of interspinous process device 100.


A delivery device 200 is also provided for implanting interspinous process device 100 described above. Delivery device 200 includes an outer catheter 210. Delivery device 200 may also include a cannula 500 disposed about outer catheter 210. Cannula 500 protects container 110 during delivery of interspinous process device 100 to the desired location in the patient's anatomy. It is also relatively stiff and thus is more easily manipulated by the surgeon during implantation of interspinous process device 100. It is to be noted that although the FIGS. show delivery device 200 being inserted from the left side of a prone patient, delivery device 200 may also be inserted into the right side of a prone patient. It is also within the scope of this invention that delivery device could be inserted in an anterior, lateral to medial approach.


Delivery device 200 may also include an inner catheter 220. In addition, if desired, a guidewire 300 may also be used in conjunction with delivery device 200. Outer catheter 210 is disposed over interspinous process device 100 to maintain it in the collapsed state against the force exerted against container 110 by support member 120. This allows interspinous process device 100 to be delivered to the desired location in a minimally invasive or percutaneous manner. In addition, an inner retractable sleeve 220 may be located inside interspinous process device 100 to hold support member 120 in an undeployed configuration. Inner retractable sleeve 220 allows for more controlled deployment of support member 120 when outer catheter 210 is removed from around undeployed interspinous process device 100 since the surgeon may slowly remove inner retractable sleeve 220 from around support member 120 and confirm, under fluoroscopy, its proper location during this removal step. Of course, where support member 120 is located within the wall of container 110 or bonded to either the inner wall or outer wall of container 110, it may not be necessary to use inner retractable sleeve 220. With this configuration, the surgeon would simply use outer catheter 210 to control deployment of support member 120. The surgeon would slowly remove outer catheter 210 from around container 110 to control its deployment and confirm that it is properly positioned before completely removing outer catheter 210 from around support member 120 and container 110.


Where inner retractable sleeve 220 is used with delivery device 200, the proximal end of container 110 has a self sealing feature that allows inner retractable sleeve 220 to be removed without compromising the fluid-tight integrity of container 110. For example, the proximal portion may have a proximal face that is formed from a plurality of flaps. As shown, for example, in FIG. 4, four such flaps 115a, 115b, 115c and 115d are formed in the proximal face. Flaps 115a, 115b, 115c and 115d are connected to the remainder of container 110 in a resilient manner so that they are biased in a closed position but are able to bend or flex in a generally proximal direction. This allows inner retractable sleeve 220 to be removed from the inside of container 110 through the proximal end thereof. In addition, the inner portion of support member 120 may be coated with silicone or other biocompatible, lubricious material to provide a lubricious surface and facilitate the removal of inner retractable sleeve 220 from container 110. Once inner retractable sleeve 220 has been removed, the natural bias of flaps 115a, 115b, 115c and 115d closes the proximal end of container 110. Where the filler material for interspinous process device 100 is curable, flaps 115a, 115b, 115c and 115d will be sealed by the filler material to maintain the integrity of interspinous process device 100. As such, inner retractable sleeve 220 is typically removed from interspinous process device 100 after it has been located in the desired position within the interspinous space of interest and after the filler material has been injected into container 110 but before the filler material has cured.


Guidewire 300 may be used to provide a track along which delivery device 200 can be advanced to simplify the delivery of interspinous process device 100 to the desired location. For example, guidewire 300 may be inserted into a patient and maneuvered by the surgeon through the interspinous ligament to the interspinous process space of interest and as far anterior in that space as possible. It may be necessary to disrupt and dislodge any soft tissue in the interspinous space to ensure proper placement of interspinous process device 100. An appropriate curette or other cutting device (not shown) may be disposed over guidewire 300 and maneuvered over guidewire 300, which acts as a track for the cutting device, to the desired location to remove the unwanted tissue. Alternatively, the cutting device does not have to be delivered to the interspinous space over guidewire 300. Delivery device 200, with interspinous process device 100 therein, is then maneuvered over guidewire 300 until interspinous process device 100 is in the desired location. Guidewire 300 can be removed at this point. Alternatively, a guidewire does not have to be used and instead outer catheter 210 may be steerable. If desired, both guidewire 300 and a steerable outer catheter 210 may be used together.


Once interspinous process device 100 is in the desired position, delivery device 200 can be withdrawn from the patient. With the removal of delivery device 200, outer catheter 210 no longer constrains support member 120. Where inner retractable sleeve 220 is not use, this allows support member 120 to be deployed and move container 110 to its unfolded larger profile configuration. Where inner retractable sleeve 220 is used to control deployment of support member 120, inner retractable sleeve 220 is removed from container 110 through flaps 115a, 115b, 115c and 115d. Thereafter, the filler material may be injected into container 110 until interspinous process device 100 has reached its desired stiffness/flexibility. The filler material may include barium sulfate to aid in visualization of interspinous process device 100 under fluoroscopy so the surgeon can confirm that interspinous process device 100 is in the proper location and is properly deployed. Barium sulfate may not be needed where support member 120 is formed from a material that is visible under fluoroscopy. Once the surgeon is satisfied that interspinous process device 100 has been appropriately deployed, conduit 130 may be removed.


While various embodiments of the flexible interspinous process device and delivery system have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. The foregoing description of the flexible interspinous process device and delivery device is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the scope of the invention. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. An implantable device and delivery system, comprising: a flexible container configured to be filled with material in situ having a proximal portion, a medial portion and a distal portion, the flexible container being movable from an undeployed configuration to a deployed configuration and wherein the proximal portion defines a first proximal height in the undeployed configuration and a second proximal height in the deployed configuration, the medial portion defines a first medial height in the undeployed configuration and a second medial height in the deployed configuration and the distal portion defines a first distal height in the undeployed configuration a second distal height in the deployed configuration and wherein the first proximal height, the first medial height and the first distal height are substantially the same and the second proximal height and the second distal height are larger than the second medial height;a support element disposed within the flexible container along the medial portion, the support member configured to expand the medial portion from the undeployed configuration to the deployed configuration;an inner removable sleeve disposed within the flexible container adjacent to the support element; andan outer catheter removably disposed about the flexible container to maintain the flexible container in the undeployed configuration.
  • 2. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 1 wherein the support element is coated with silicone.
  • 3. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 1 wherein the support element is a mesh.
  • 4. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 3 wherein the mesh is self-expanding.
  • 5. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 1 wherein the proximal portion includes a plurality of resealable flaps that define a closable opening along a proximal face of the container and which are adapted to allow the removable inner sleeve to be removed from the container.
  • 6. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 5 wherein the plurality of flaps are biased to a closed position.
  • 7. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 5 wherein the flexible container is formed from a self-sealing material.
  • 8. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 1 wherein the outer catheter is steerable.
  • 9. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 1 further comprising a cannula disposed about the outer catheter.
  • 10. The implantable device and delivery system of claim 1 wherein the proximal portion and the distal portion are folded in the undeployed configuration.
  • 11. A method comprising; providing the device of claim 1; disposing the device within an outer catheter to maintain the device in the undeployed configuration; delivering the device and a distal portion of the outer catheter to a desired location within a patient's anatomy; removing the outer catheter from the desired location; filling the device with a biocompatible material in situ when the device is in the deployed configuration.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 further including providing a removable inner sleeve within the container adjacent to the support element.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 wherein filling the device occurs when the biocompatible material is a fluid and further comprising allowing the biocompatible material to reach a final cure state and removing the removable inner sleeve from the container prior to the final cure state.
  • 14. The method of claim 11 further comprising allowing the support element to expand the flexible container in situ.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein filling the device with a biocompatible material is performed after allowing the support element to expand the flexible container in situ.
  • 16. The method of claim 11 further comprising inserting a guidewire into the patient and disposing the guidewire such that a distal portion of the guidewire is located between two adjacent spinous processes of the patient.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 advancing the device and outer catheter over the guidewire.
  • 18. The method of claim 16 wherein the desired location is an interspinous space defined by a superior spinous process and an inferior spinous process.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 further comprising dislodging any soft tissue located in the interspinous space.
  • 20. The method of claim 19 wherein the disruption is performed with a curette.
US Referenced Citations (321)
Number Name Date Kind
624969 Peterson May 1899 A
1153797 Kegreisz Sep 1915 A
1516347 Pataky Nov 1924 A
1870942 Beatty Aug 1932 A
2077804 Morrison Apr 1937 A
2299308 Creighton Oct 1942 A
2485531 Dzus et al. Oct 1949 A
2607370 Anderson Aug 1952 A
2677369 Knowles May 1954 A
2685877 Dobelle Aug 1954 A
3065659 Eriksson et al. Nov 1962 A
3108595 Overment Oct 1963 A
3426364 Lumb Feb 1969 A
3648691 Lumb et al. Mar 1972 A
3779239 Fischer et al. Dec 1973 A
3867728 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
4011602 Rybicki et al. Mar 1977 A
4237875 Termanini Dec 1980 A
4257409 Bacal et al. Mar 1981 A
4274324 Giannuzzi Jun 1981 A
4289123 Dunn Sep 1981 A
4401112 Rezaian Aug 1983 A
4519100 Wills et al. May 1985 A
4553273 Wu Nov 1985 A
4554914 Kapp et al. Nov 1985 A
4573454 Hoffman Mar 1986 A
4592341 Omagari et al. Jun 1986 A
4599086 Doty Jul 1986 A
4604995 Stephens et al. Aug 1986 A
4611582 Duff Sep 1986 A
4632101 Freedland Dec 1986 A
4636217 Ogilvie et al. Jan 1987 A
4646998 Pate Mar 1987 A
4657550 Daher Apr 1987 A
4662808 Camilleri May 1987 A
4686970 Dove et al. Aug 1987 A
4704057 McSherry Nov 1987 A
4759769 Hedman et al. Jul 1988 A
4787378 Sodhi Nov 1988 A
4822226 Kennedy Apr 1989 A
4827918 Olerud May 1989 A
4834600 Lemke May 1989 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4886405 Blomberg Dec 1989 A
4892545 Day et al. Jan 1990 A
4913144 Del Medico Apr 1990 A
4931055 Bumpus et al. Jun 1990 A
4932975 Main et al. Jun 1990 A
4969887 Sodhi Nov 1990 A
4969888 Scholten et al. Nov 1990 A
5011484 Breard Apr 1991 A
5047055 Bao et al. Sep 1991 A
5059193 Kuslich Oct 1991 A
5092866 Breard et al. Mar 1992 A
5098433 Freedland Mar 1992 A
5171278 Pisharodi Dec 1992 A
5171280 Baumgartner Dec 1992 A
5201734 Cozad et al. Apr 1993 A
5290312 Kojimoto et al. Mar 1994 A
5306275 Bryan Apr 1994 A
5306310 Siebels Apr 1994 A
5312405 Korotko et al. May 1994 A
5360430 Lin Nov 1994 A
5366455 Dove Nov 1994 A
5390683 Pisharodi Feb 1995 A
5395370 Muller et al. Mar 1995 A
5401269 Buttner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5403316 Ashman Apr 1995 A
5415661 Holmes May 1995 A
5437672 Alleyne Aug 1995 A
5437674 Worcel et al. Aug 1995 A
5439463 Lin Aug 1995 A
5454812 Lin Oct 1995 A
5458641 Ramirez Jimenez Oct 1995 A
5496318 Howland et al. Mar 1996 A
5518498 Lindenberg et al. May 1996 A
5549679 Kuslich Aug 1996 A
5554191 Lahille et al. Sep 1996 A
5562662 Brumfield et al. Oct 1996 A
5562735 Margulies Oct 1996 A
5562736 Ray et al. Oct 1996 A
5571192 Schonhoffer Nov 1996 A
5609634 Voydeville Mar 1997 A
5609635 Michelson Mar 1997 A
5628756 Barker, Jr. et al. May 1997 A
5630816 Kambin May 1997 A
5645597 Krapiva Jul 1997 A
5645599 Samani Jul 1997 A
5653762 Pisharodi Aug 1997 A
5653763 Errico et al. Aug 1997 A
5658335 Allen Aug 1997 A
5665122 Kambin Sep 1997 A
5674295 Ray et al. Oct 1997 A
5676702 Ratron Oct 1997 A
5685826 Bonutti Nov 1997 A
5690649 Li Nov 1997 A
5693100 Pisharodi Dec 1997 A
5702395 Hopf Dec 1997 A
5702452 Argenson et al. Dec 1997 A
5702454 Baumgartner Dec 1997 A
5702455 Saggar Dec 1997 A
5707390 Bonutti Jan 1998 A
5716416 Lin Feb 1998 A
5723013 Jeanson et al. Mar 1998 A
5725341 Hofmeister Mar 1998 A
5746762 Bass May 1998 A
5755797 Baumgartner May 1998 A
5800547 Schafer et al. Sep 1998 A
5800549 Bao et al. Sep 1998 A
5810815 Morales Sep 1998 A
5836948 Zucherman et al. Nov 1998 A
5849004 Bramlet Dec 1998 A
5860977 Zucherman et al. Jan 1999 A
5888196 Bonutti Mar 1999 A
5964730 Williams et al. Oct 1999 A
5976186 Bao et al. Nov 1999 A
5980523 Jackson Nov 1999 A
6022376 Assell et al. Feb 2000 A
6048342 Zucherman et al. Apr 2000 A
6066154 Reiley et al. May 2000 A
6068630 Zucherman et al. May 2000 A
6126689 Brett Oct 2000 A
6126691 Kasra et al. Oct 2000 A
6127597 Beyar et al. Oct 2000 A
6132464 Martin Oct 2000 A
6190413 Sutcliffe Feb 2001 B1
6190414 Young Feb 2001 B1
6214050 Huene Apr 2001 B1
6293949 Justis et al. Sep 2001 B1
6336930 Stalcup et al. Jan 2002 B1
6348053 Cachia Feb 2002 B1
6352537 Strnad Mar 2002 B1
6364883 Santilli Apr 2002 B1
6371987 Weiland et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375682 Fleischmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6402750 Atkinson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402751 Hoeck et al. Jun 2002 B1
6419704 Ferree Jul 2002 B1
6440169 Elberg et al. Aug 2002 B1
6447513 Griggs Sep 2002 B1
6451019 Zucherman et al. Sep 2002 B1
6500178 Zucherman et al. Dec 2002 B2
6514256 Zucherman et al. Feb 2003 B2
6520991 Huene Feb 2003 B2
6554833 Levy et al. Apr 2003 B2
6582433 Yun Jun 2003 B2
6582467 Teitelbaum et al. Jun 2003 B1
6592585 Lee et al. Jul 2003 B2
6626944 Taylor Sep 2003 B1
6645207 Dixon et al. Nov 2003 B2
6685742 Jackson Feb 2004 B1
6695842 Zucherman et al. Feb 2004 B2
6709435 Lin Mar 2004 B2
6723126 Berry Apr 2004 B1
6730126 Boehm, Jr. et al. May 2004 B2
6733533 Lozier May 2004 B1
6733534 Sherman May 2004 B2
6736818 Perren et al. May 2004 B2
6743257 Castro Jun 2004 B2
6758863 Estes et al. Jul 2004 B2
6761720 Senegas Jul 2004 B1
6770096 Bolger et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783530 Levy Aug 2004 B1
6835205 Atkinson et al. Dec 2004 B2
6905512 Paes et al. Jun 2005 B2
6946000 Senegas et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958077 Suddaby Oct 2005 B2
6969404 Ferree Nov 2005 B2
6981975 Michelson Jan 2006 B2
7011685 Arnin et al. Mar 2006 B2
7041136 Goble et al. May 2006 B2
7048736 Robinson et al. May 2006 B2
7081120 Li et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087083 Pasquet et al. Aug 2006 B2
7097648 Globerman et al. Aug 2006 B1
7101375 Zucherman et al. Sep 2006 B2
7163558 Senegas et al. Jan 2007 B2
7201751 Zucherman et al. Apr 2007 B2
7217293 Branch, Jr. May 2007 B2
7238204 Le Couedic et al. Jul 2007 B2
7306628 Zucherman et al. Dec 2007 B2
7335203 Winslow et al. Feb 2008 B2
7377942 Berry May 2008 B2
7442208 Mathieu et al. Oct 2008 B2
7445637 Taylor Nov 2008 B2
7458981 Fielding et al. Dec 2008 B2
7582106 Teitelbaum et al. Sep 2009 B2
7604652 Arnin et al. Oct 2009 B2
7611316 Panasik et al. Nov 2009 B2
20010016743 Zucherman et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020143331 Zucherman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030040746 Mitchell et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030045940 Eberlein et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065330 Zucherman et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030153915 Nekozuka et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040083002 Belef et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040087947 Lim et al. May 2004 A1
20040097931 Mitchell May 2004 A1
20040133204 Davies Jul 2004 A1
20040133280 Trieu Jul 2004 A1
20040167625 Beyar et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040199255 Mathieu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040260397 Lambrecht et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010293 Zucherman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050049708 Atkinson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085814 Sherman et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050165398 Reiley Jul 2005 A1
20050203512 Hawkins et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203519 Harms et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203624 Serhan et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228391 Levy et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245937 Winslow Nov 2005 A1
20050261768 Trieu Nov 2005 A1
20050273166 Sweeney Dec 2005 A1
20050288672 Ferree Dec 2005 A1
20060004447 Mastrorio et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060004455 Leonard et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015181 Elberg Jan 2006 A1
20060064165 Zucherman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060084983 Kim Apr 2006 A1
20060084985 Kim Apr 2006 A1
20060084987 Kim Apr 2006 A1
20060084988 Kim Apr 2006 A1
20060085069 Kim Apr 2006 A1
20060085070 Kim Apr 2006 A1
20060085074 Raiszadeh Apr 2006 A1
20060089654 Lins et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060089719 Trieu Apr 2006 A1
20060095136 McLuen May 2006 A1
20060106381 Ferree et al. May 2006 A1
20060106397 Lins May 2006 A1
20060111728 Abdou May 2006 A1
20060116690 Pagano Jun 2006 A1
20060122620 Kim Jun 2006 A1
20060129239 Kwak Jun 2006 A1
20060136060 Taylor Jun 2006 A1
20060184247 Edidin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184248 Edidin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195102 Malandain Aug 2006 A1
20060217726 Maxy et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224159 Anderson Oct 2006 A1
20060224241 Butler et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235387 Peterman Oct 2006 A1
20060235532 Meunier et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241601 Trautwein et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241613 Bruneau et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241757 Anderson Oct 2006 A1
20060247623 Anderson et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060247640 Blackwell et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060264938 Zucherman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271044 Petrini et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271049 Zucherman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282079 Labrom et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293662 Boyer, II et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060293663 Walkenhorst et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005064 Anderson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070032790 Aschmann et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043362 Malandain et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070100340 Lange et al. May 2007 A1
20070123861 Dewey et al. May 2007 A1
20070142915 Altarac et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070151116 Malandain Jul 2007 A1
20070162000 Perkins Jul 2007 A1
20070162136 O'Neil et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167945 Lange et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173822 Bruneau et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173823 Dewey et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070191833 Bruneau et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191834 Bruneau et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191837 Trieu Aug 2007 A1
20070191838 Bruneau et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198091 Boyer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070225807 Phan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233068 Bruneau et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233074 Anderson et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233076 Trieu Oct 2007 A1
20070233081 Pasquet et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233089 DiPoto et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250060 Anderson et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070270823 Trieu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270824 Lim et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270825 Carls et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270826 Trieu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270827 Lim et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270828 Bruneau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270829 Carls et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270834 Bruneau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270874 Anderson Nov 2007 A1
20070272259 Allard et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276368 Trieu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276369 Allard et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276493 Malandain et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276496 Lange et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276497 Anderson Nov 2007 A1
20070282443 Globerman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080021457 Anderson et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021460 Bruneau et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033251 Araghi Feb 2008 A1
20080058934 Malandain et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080114357 Allard et al. May 2008 A1
20080114358 Anderson et al. May 2008 A1
20080114456 Dewey et al. May 2008 A1
20080147190 Dewey et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161818 Kloss et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167685 Allard et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183211 Lamborne et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183218 Mueller et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080215094 Taylor Sep 2008 A1
20080221685 Altarac et al. Sep 2008 A9
20080262617 Froehlich et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281360 Vittur et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281361 Vittur et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090062915 Kohm et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090105773 Lange et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118833 Hudgins et al. May 2009 A1
20090216274 Morancy-Meister et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090234389 Chuang et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090270918 Attia et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090312806 Sherman et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100121379 Edmond May 2010 A1
20100262240 Chavatte et al. Oct 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (55)
Number Date Country
2821678 Nov 1979 DE
3922044 Feb 1991 DE
4012622 Jul 1991 DE
0322334 Feb 1992 EP
0767636 Jan 1999 EP
1004276 May 2000 EP
1138268 Oct 2001 EP
1302169 Apr 2003 EP
1330987 Jul 2003 EP
1854433 Nov 2007 EP
1982664 Oct 2008 EP
2623085 May 1989 FR
2625097 Jun 1989 FR
2681525 Mar 1993 FR
2700941 Aug 1994 FR
2703239 Oct 1994 FR
2707864 Jan 1995 FR
2717675 Sep 1995 FR
2722087 Jan 1996 FR
2722088 Jan 1996 FR
2724554 Mar 1996 FR
2725892 Apr 1996 FR
2730156 Aug 1996 FR
2731643 Sep 1996 FR
2775183 Aug 1999 FR
2799948 Apr 2001 FR
2816197 May 2002 FR
02-224660 Sep 1990 JP
09-075381 Mar 1997 JP
988281 Jan 1983 SU
1484348 Jun 1989 SU
WO 9426192 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9426195 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9718769 May 1997 WO
WO 9820939 May 1998 WO
WO 9926562 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9959669 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0044319 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0154598 Aug 2001 WO
WO 03057055 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2004047689 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004047691 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004084768 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2005002474 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005009300 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005011507 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005044118 May 2005 WO
WO 2005048856 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005110258 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006064356 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2007034516 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007052975 May 2007 WO
WO 2009083276 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009083583 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009098536 Aug 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (62)
Entry
“Dispositivo Intervertebrale Ammortizzante DIAM,” date unknown, p. 1.
“Tecnica Operatoria Per II Posizionamento Della Protesi DIAM,” date unknown, pp. 1-3.
“Wallis Operative Technique: Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of Lumbar Spine,” date unknown, pp. 1-24, Spine Next, an Abbott Laboratories company, Bordeaux, France.
Benzel et al., “Posterior Cervical Interspinous Compression Wiring and Fusion for Mid to Low Cervical Spinal Injuries,” J. Neurosurg., Jun. 1989, pp. 893-899, vol. 70.
Caserta et al., “Elastic Stabilization Alone or Combined with Rigid Fusion in Spinal Surgery: a Biomechanical Study and Clinical Experience Based on 82 Cases,” Eur. Spine J., Oct. 2002, pp. S192-S197, vol. 11, Suppl. 2.
Christie et al., “Dynamic Interspinous Process Technology,” SPINE, 2005, pp. S73-S78, vol. 30, No. 16S.
Cousin Biotech, “Analysis of Clinical Experience with a Posterior Shock-Absorbing Implant,” date unknown, pp. 2-9.
Cousin Biotech, Dispositif Intervertébral Amortissant, Jun. 1998, pp. 1-4.
Cousin Biotech, Technique Operatoire de la Prothese DIAM, date unknown, Annexe 1, pp. 1-8.
Dickman et al., “The Interspinous Method of Posterior Atlantoaxial Arthrodesis,” J. Neurosurg., Feb. 1991, pp. 190-198, vol. 74.
Dubois et al., “Dynamic Neutralization: A New Concept for Restabilization of the Spine,” Lumbar Segmental Insability, Szpalski et al., eds., 1999, pp. 233-240, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Duff, “Methyl Methacrylate in Spinal Stabilization,” Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 147-151, Ch. 14, Thieme, New York.
Ebara et al., “Inoperative Measurement of Lumbar Spinal Instability,” SPINE, 1992, pp. S44-S50, vol. 17, No. 3S.
Fassio et al., “Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Instability L4-L5 by Interspinous Ligamentoplasty,” Rachis, Dec. 1991, pp. 465-474, vol. 3, No. 6.
Fassio, “Mise au Point Sur la Ligamentoplastie Inter-Epineuse Lombaire Dans les Instabilites,” Maîtrise Orthopédique, Jul. 1993, pp. 18, No. 25.
Garner et al., “Development and Preclinical Testing of a New Tension-Band Device for the Spine: the Loop System,” Eur. Spine J., Aug. 7, 2002, pp. S186-S191, vol. 11, Suppl. 2.
Guang et al., “Interspinous Process Segmental Instrumentation with Bone-Button-Wire for Correction of Scoliosis,” Chinese Medical J., 1990, pp. 721-725, vol. 103.
Guizzardi et al., “The Use of Diam (Interspinous Stress-Breaker Device) in the Prevention of Chronic Low Back Pain in Young Patients Operated on for Large Dimension Lumbar Disc Herniation,” 12th Eur. Cong. Neurosurg., Sep. 7-12, 2003, pp. 835-839, Port.
Hambly et al., “Tension Band Wiring-Bone Grafting for Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis,” SPINE, 1989, pp. 455-460, vol. 14, No. 4.
Kiwerski, “Rehabilitation of Patients with Thoracic Spine Injury Treated by Spring Alloplasty,” Int. J. Rehab. Research, 1983, pp. 469-474, vol. 6, No. 4.
Kramer et al., “Intervetertebral Disk Diseases: Causes, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prophylaxis,” pp. 244-249, Medical, 1990.
Laudet et al., “Comportement Bio-Mécanique D'Un Ressort Inter-Apophysaire Vertébral Postérieur Analyse Expérimentale Due Comportement Discal En Compression Et En Flexion/Extension,” Rachis, 1993, vol. 5, No. 2.
Mah et al., “Threaded K-Wire Spinous Process Fixation of the Axis for Modified Gallie Fusion in Children and Adolescents,” J. Pediatric Othopaedics, 1989, pp. 675-679, vol. 9.
Mariottini et al., “Preliminary Results of a Soft Novel Lumbar Intervertebral Prothesis (DIAM) in the Degenerative Spinal Pathology,” Acta Neurochir., Adv. Peripheral Nerve Surg. and Minimal Invas. Spinal Surg., 2005, pp. 129-131, vol. 92, Suppl.
McDonnell et al., “Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion: Indications and Techniques,” Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 92-106, Ch. 9, Thieme, New York.
Minns et al., “Preliminary Design and Experimental Studies of a Novel Soft Implant for Correcting Sagittal Plane Instability in the Lumbar Spine,” SPINE, 1997, pp. 1819-1825, vol. 22, No. 16.
Müller, “Restauration Dynamique de la Stabilité Rachidienne,” Tiré de la Sulzer Technical Review, Jan. 1999, Sulzer Management Ltd, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Pennal et al., “Stenosis of the Lumbar Spinal Canal,” Clinical Neurosurgery: Proceedings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, 1970, Tindall et al., eds., 1971, Ch. 6, pp. 86-105, vol. 18.
Petrini et al., “Analisi Di Un'Esperienza Clinica Con Un Impianto Posteriore Ammortizzante,” S.O.T.I.M.I. Societá di Ortopedia e Traumatologia dell'Italia Meridionale e Insulare 90 ° Congresso, Jun. 21-23, 2001, Paestum.
Petrini et al., “Stabilizzazione Elastica,” Patologia Degenerativa del Rachide Lombare, Oct. 5-6, 2001, Rimini.
Porter, “Spinal Stenosis and Neurogenic Claudication,” SPINE, Sep. 1, 1996, pp. 2046-2052, vol. 21, No. 17.
Pupin et al., “Clinical Experience with a Posterior Shock-Absorbing Implant in Lumbar Spine,” World Spine 1: First Interdisciplinary World Congress on Spinal Surgery and Related Disciplines, Aug. 27-Sep. 1, 2000, Berlin, Germany.
Rengachary et al., “Cervical Spine Stabilization with Flexible, Multistrand Cable System,” Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 79-81, Ch. 7, Thieme, New York.
Richards et al., “The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication,” SPINE, 2005, pp. 744-749, vol. 30, No. 7.
Scarfò, “Instability/Stenosis: Holistic Approach for Less Invasive Surgery,” date unknown, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Schiavone et al., “The Use of Disc Assistance Prosthesis (DIAM) in Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: Indications, Technique, Results,” Italian J. Spinal Disorders, 2003, pp. 213-220, vol. 3, No. 2.
Schlegel et al., “The Role of Distraction in Improving the Space Available in the Lumbar Stenotic Canal and Foramen,” SPINE, 1994, pp. 2041-2047, vol. 19, No. 18.
Senegas et al., “Le Recalibrage du Canal Lombaire, Alternative à la Laminectomie dans le Traitement des Sténoses du Canal Lombaire,” Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique, 1988, pp. 15-22.
Senegas et al., “Stabilisation Lombaire Souple,” Instabilité Vertébrales Lombaires, Gastambide, ed., 1995, pp. 122-132, Expansion Scientifique Française, Paris, France.
Senegas, “La Ligamentoplastie Inter Vertébrate Lombaire, Alternative a L'Arthrodèse,” La Revue de Medécine Orthopédique, Jun. 1990, pp. 33-35, No. 20.
Senegas, “La Ligamentoplastie Intervertébrale, Alternative à L'arthrodèse dans le Traitement des Instabilités Dégénératives,” Acta Othopaedica Belgica, 1991, pp. 221-226, vol. 57, Suppl. I.
Senegas, “Mechanical Supplementation by Non-Rigid Fixation in Degenerative Intervertebral Lumbar Segments: the Wallis System,” Eur. Spine J., 2002, p. 5164-S169, vol. 11, Suppl. 2.
Senegas, “Rencontre,” Maîtrise Orthopédique, May 1995, pp. 1-3, No. 44.
Serhan, “Spinal Implants: Past, Present, and Future,” 19th International IEEE/EMBS Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 1997, pp. 2636-2639, Chicago, Illinois.
Spadea et al., “Interspinous Fusion for the Treatment of Herniated Intervertebral Discs: Utilizing a Lumbar Spinous Process as a Bone Graft,” Annals of Surgery, 1952, pp. 982-986, vol. 136, No. 6.
Sulzer Innotec, “DIAM—Modified CAD Geometry and Meshing,” date unknown.
Taylor et al., “Analyse d'une expérience clinique d'un implant postérieur amortissant,” Rachis Revue de Pathologie Vertébrale, Oct./Nov. 1999, vol. 11, No. 4-5, Gieda Inter Rachis.
Taylor et al., “Surgical Requirement for the Posterior Control of the Rotational Centers,” date unknown.
Taylor et al., “Technical and Anatomical Considerations for the Placement of a Posterior Interspinous Stabilizer,” 2004, pp. 1-10, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee.
Taylor, “Biomechanical Requirements for the Posterior Control of the Centers of Rotation,” Swiss Spine Institute International Symposium: Progress in Spinal Fixation, Jun. 21-22, 2002, pp. 1-2, Swiss Spine Institute, Bern, Switzerland.
Taylor, “Non-Fusion Technologies of the Posterior Column: A New Posterior Shock Absorber,” International Symposium on Intervertebral Disc Replacement and Non-Fusion-Technology, May 3-5, 2001, Spine Arthroplasty.
Taylor, “Posterior Dynamic Stabilization using the DIAM (Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion),” date unknown, pp. 1-5.
Taylor, “Présentation à un an d'un dispositif amortissant d'assistance discale,” 5èmes journées Avances & Controverses en pathologie rachidienne, Oct. 1-2, 1998, Faculté Libre de Médecine de Lille.
Tsuji et al., “Ceramic Interspinous Block (CISB) Assisted Anterior Interbody Fusion,” J. Spinal Disorders, 1990, pp. 77-86, vol. 3, No. 1.
Vangilder, “Interspinous, Laminar, and Facet Posterior Cervical Bone Fusions,” Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 135-146, Ch. 13, Thieme, New York.
Voydeville et al., “Experimental Lumbar Instability and Artificial Ligament,” Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol., Jul. 15, 2000, pp. 167-176, vol. 10.
Voydeville et al., “Lumbar Instability Treated by Intervertebral Ligamentoplasty with Smooth Wedges,” Orthopédie Traumatologie, 1992, pp. 259-264, vol. 2, No. 4.
Waldemar Link, “Spinal Surgery: Instrumentation and Implants for Spinal Surgery,” 1981, Link America Inc., New Jersey.
Wiltse et al., “The Treatment of Spinal Stenosis,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Urist, ed., Mar.-Apr. 1976, pp. 83-91, No. 115.
Wisneski et al., “Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis,” Seminars in Spine Surgery, Wiesel, ed., Jun. 1994, pp. 116-123, vol. 6, No. 2.
Zdeblick et al., “Two-Point Fixation of the Lumbar Spine Differential Stability in Rotation,” SPINE, 1991, pp. S298-S301, vol. 16, No. 6, Supplement.
Zucherman et al., “Clinical Efficacy of Spinal Instrumentation in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Desease,” SPINE, Jul. 1992, pp. 834-837, vol. 17, No. 7.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120022590 A1 Jan 2012 US