Injectable ready-to-use solutions containing an antitumor anthracycline glycoside

Abstract
A sealed glass container containing therein a stable, injectable, sterile, pyrogen-free doxorubicin anti-tumor composition in a solution which consists essentially of a physiologically acceptable salt of doxorubicin dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent therefor, wherein said solution has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate, and wherein said solution has a pH of from 2.5-3.5 and a concentration of said doxorubicin of from 0.1 to 100 mg/ml.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a stable, injectable, ready-to-use solution of an antitumor anthracycline glycoside, e.g. doxorubicin (Adriamycin.sup.R), to a process for preparing such a solution, and providing the same in a sealed container, and to a method for treating tumors by the use of the ready-to-use solution.
2. Description of the Related Art
The anthracycline glycoside compounds are a well known class of compounds in the antineoplastic group of agents, of which doxorubicin is a typical, and the most widely used, representative: Doxorubicin. Anticancer Antibiotics, Federico Arcamone, 1981, Publ: Academic Press, New York, N.Y.; Adriamycin Review, EROTC International Symposium, Brussels, May, 1974, edited by M. Staquet, Publ. Eur. Press Medikon, Ghent, Belg.; Results of Adriamycin Therapy, Adriamycin Symposium at Frankfurt/Main 1974 edited by M. Ghione, J. Fetzer and H. Maier, publ.: Springer, New York, N.Y.
In the past, solutions of anthracycline glycosides have been prepared and the stability thereof has been studied. However, results of these studies have been inconsistent, and no clear parameters have emerged for maintenance of a stable anthracycline glycoside, e.g., doxorubicin, solution. Bosanquet, in a recent article entitled "Stability of solutions of antineoplastic agents during preparation and storage for in vitro assays," (Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1986, 17, 1-10) reviews the field of stability studies, with particular emphasis on doxorubicin (Adriamycin.sup.R). He points out that "very little can be categorically stated about the stability of adriamycin, and a very carefully designed study is urgently required to resolve these conflicting results."
At present, anthracycline clycoside antitumor drugs, in particular, e.g., doxorubicin, are solely available in the form of lyophilized preparations, which need to be reconstituted before administration.
Both the manufacturing and the reconstitution of such preparations expose the involved personnel (workers, pharmacists, medical personnel, nurses) to risks of contamination which are particularly serious due to the toxicity of the antitumor substances.
Indeed, the Martindale Extra Pharmacopoeia 28th edition, page 175 left column, reports on adverse effects of antineoplastic drugs and recommends that "They must be handled with great care and contact with skin and eyes avoided; they should not be inhaled. Care must be taken to avoid extravasation since pain and tissue damage may ensue".
Similarly, Scand. J. Work Environ Health vol. 10(2), pages 71-74 (1984), as well as articles in Chemistry Industry, Issue Jul. 4, 1983, page 488, and Drug-Topics-Medical-Economics-Co, Issue Feb. 7, 1983, page 99, report severe adverse effects observed in medical personnel exposed to use of cytostatic agents, including doxorubicin.
Even though the effect of long-term low-level exposure to such cytotoxic drugs is not yet completely known, there is certainly a hazard for those who regularly prepared and administer these substances in view of the fact that they are known mutagens and carcinogens in animals and implicated as carcinogens in man.
To administer a lyophilized preparation, double handling of the drug is required, the lyophilized cake having to be first reconstituted and then administered. Moreover, in some cases, the complete dissolution of the powder may require prolonged shaking because of solubilization problems. Reconstitution of a lyophilized cake or powder can result in formation of aerosol droplets which can be inhaled or can come into contact with skin or mucous membranes of those handling the solution.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
As the risks connected with the manufacturing and the reconstitution of a lyophilized preparation would be highly reduced if a ready-to-use solution of the drug were available, the present inventors have developed a stable, therapeutically acceptable injectable solution of an anthracycline glycoside drug, e.g. doxorubicin, whose preparation and administration does not require either lyophilization or reconstitution.
According to the present invention, there is provided a stable, injectable, sterile, pyrogen-free, anthracycline glycoside solution which consists essentially of a physiologically acceptable salt of an anthracycline glycoside dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent therefor, which has not been resonstituted from a lyophilizate, which has a pH of from 2.5 to 3.5 and which is preferably contained in a sealed glass container.





DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1 is a K.sub.obs pH profile for doxorubicin. HCl degradation at 55.degree. C. in sterile water.
FIG. 2 is a K.sub.obs pH profile for doxorubicin. HCl degradation at 55.degree. C. in 5% dextrose.
FIG. 3 is a K.sub.obs pH profile for doxorubicin. HCl degradation at 55.degree. C. in 0.9% saline.
FIG. 4 is a logarithmic plot of residual doxorubicin HCl concentration versus time.
FIG. 5 is a logarithmic plot of residual doxorubicin HCl concentration in 0.9% NaCl.
FIG. 6 is a logarithmic plot of residual doxorubicin HCl concentration in 5% dextrose.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
A preferred pH range for the anthracycline glycoside solution of this invention is from 2.5 to 3.5. A more preferred range is from 2.7 to 3.5, and a particularly preferred range is from 2.7 to 3.3. A range of 2.7 up to about 3.0 may also be mentioned as a useful range.
The preferred anthracycline glycoside is doxorubicin hydrochloride. It is known that doxorubicin hydrochloride is more stable in acidic than neutral or basic solutions. See Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances, Vol. 9, Klaus Florey, ed. (Academic Press 1980). A number of stability studies are summarized in Bosanquet, Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 17, 1986, 1-10. However, these studies are inconsistent, in part because of the varying media used to make up the solutions and the methods used to measure stability. Taken as a whole, the prior art has not appreciated with any degree of certainty how to prepare a stable, injectable doxorubicin solution, as a function of pH.
Martindale-The Extra Pharmacopeia 28th edition, 1828, on page 205, indicates that a 0.5% solution of doxorubicin hydrochloride and water has a pH of 3.8 to 6.5. Reconstitution of the commercial freeze dried formulation which is made of doxorubicin hydrochloride and lactose, leads to a solution having a pH in the range of between 4.5 and 6, containing doxorubicin at 2 milligrams per milliliter concentration and lactose, and additionally containing sodium chloride when saline is used for reconstitution. In order to lower the pH below that of reconstituted solutions, one must add an acid to lower the pH. In the past there was little motivation for a user of the drug to add an acid to lower the pH, since it was not recognized that the drug was actually more stable at pH's between about 2.5 and 3.5. According to the present invention, it has been discovered that anthracycline glycosides, such as doxorubicin hydrochloride, are stable in the pH range disclosed herein in physiologically acceptable media. The prior art did not recognize stability for an injectable doxorubicin solution in the particular narrow pH range disclosed herein, so this pH range was not considered to be a particularly useful range for administration of this drug.
Preferably the solution of the invention is provided in a sealed container, especially one made of glass, either in a unit dosage form or in a multiple dosage form.
In addition to doxorubicin, other anthracycline glycosides include 4'-epi-doxorubicin (i.e. epirubicin), 4'-desoxy-doxorubicin (i.e. esorubicin), 4'-desoxy-4'-iodo-doxorubicin, daunorubicin and 4-demethoxydaunorubicin (i.e. idarubicin).
Any physiologically acceptable salt of the anthracycline glycoside may be used for preparing the solution of the invention. Examples of suitable salts may be, for instance, the salts with mineral inorganic acids such as hydrochloric, hydrobromic, sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric and the like, and the salts with certain organic acids such as acetic, succinic, tartaric, ascorbic, citric, glutamic, benzoic, methanesulfonic, ethanesulfonic and the like. The salt with hydrochloric acid is a particularly preferred salt, especially when the anthracycline glycoside is doxorubicin.
Any solvent which is physiologically acceptable and which is able to dissolve the anthracycline glycoside salt may be used. The solution of the invention may also contain one or more additional components such as a co-solubilizing agent (which may be the same as a solvent), a tonicity adjustment agent, a stabilizing agent and a preservative. Examples of solvents, co-solubilizing agents, tonicity adjustment agents, stabilizing agents and preservatives which can be used for the preparation of the anthracycline glycoside solutions of the invention are hereunder reported.
Suitable solvents and co-solubilizing agents may be, for instance, water; physiological saline; aliphatic amides, e.g. N,N-dimethylacetamide, N-hydroxy-2-ethyl-lactamide and the like; alcohols, e.g. ethanol, benzyl alcohol and the like; glycols and polyalcohols, e.g. propyleneglycol, glycerin and the like; esters of polyalcohols, e.g. diacetine, triacetine and the like; polyglycols and polyethers, e.g. polyethyleneglycol 400, propyleneglycol methylethers and the like; dioxolanes, e.g. isopropylidenglycerin and the like; dimethylisosorbide; pyrrolidone derivatives, e.g. 2-pyrrolidone, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, polyvinylpyrrolidone (co-solubilizing agent only) and the like; polyoxyethylenated fatty alcohols, e.g., Brij.RTM. and the like; esters of polyoxyethylenated fatty acids, e.g., Cremophor.RTM., Myrj.RTM. and the like; polysorbates, e.g., Tweens.RTM.; polyoxyethylene derivatives of polypropyleneglycols, e.g., Pluronics.RTM..
A particularly preferred co-solubilizing agent is polyvinylpyrrolidone.
Suitable tonicity adjustment agents may be, for instance, physiologically acceptable inorganic chlorides, e.g. sodium chloride; dextrose; lactose; mannitol; sorbitol and the like.
Preservatives suitable for physiological administration may be, for instance, esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid (e.g., methyl, ethyl, propyl and butyl esters, or mixtures of them), chlorocresol and the like.
Suitable stabilizing agents include monosaccharides (e.g., galactose, fructose, and fucose), disaccharides (e.g., lactose), polysaccharides (e.g., dextran), cyclic oligosaccharides (e.g., .alpha.-, .beta.-, .gamma.-cyclodextrin), aliphatic polyols (e.g., mannitol, sorbitol, and thioglycerol), cyclic polyols (e.g. inositol) and organic solvents (e.g., ethyl alcohol and glycerol). These may be included in concentrations of from about 0.25-10% w/v, preferably 0.5-5% w/v in the solution.
The above mentioned solvents and co-solubilizing agents, tonicity adjustment agents, stabilizing agents and preservatives can be used alone or as a mixture of two or more of them.
Examples of preferred solvents are water, ethanol, polyethylene glycol and dimethylacetamide as well as mixtures in various proportions of these solvents. Water is a particularly preferred solvent. Other solvents giving good results in terms of stability are 0.9% sodium chloride solution (i.e., physiological saline), and, especially, 5% dextrose solution, 5% mannitol solution and 5% sorbitol solution, i.e., aqueous solutions containing approximately 5% of, respectively, dextrose, mannitol or sorbitol. Small variations (.+-.2-3%) of these additional ingredients also fall within the scope of the present invention.
To adjust the pH within the range of from 2.5 to about 3.5, a physiologically acceptable acid is added to the solution of the anthracycline glycoside. The acid should be a physiologically acceptable acid, e.g., an inorganic mineral acid such as hydrochloric, hydrobromic, sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric and the like, or an organic acid such as acetic, succinic, tartaric, ascorbic, citric, glutamic, benzoic, methanesulphonic, ethanesulfonic and the like, or also an acidic physiologically acceptable buffer solution, e.g., a chloride buffer, an acetate buffer, a phosphate buffer and the like.
In the solutions of the invention the concentration of the anthracycline glycoside may vary within broad ranges, preferably from 0.1 mg/ml to 100 mg/ml, in particular from 0.1 mg/ml to 50 mg/ml, most preferably from 1 mg/ml to 20 mg/ml.
The preferred ranges of concentration may be slightly different for different anthracycline glycosides. Thus, for example, preferred concentrations for doxorubicin are from about 2 mg/ml to about 50 mg/ml, preferably from 2 mg/ml to 20 mg/ml, particularly appropriate values being 2 mg/ml and 5 mg/ml. Similar concentrations are preferred also for 4'-epi-doxorubicin, 4'-desoxy-doxorubicin and 4'-desoxy-4'-iodo-doxorubicin. Preferred ranges of concentration for daunorubicin and 4-demethoxy-daunorubicin are from 0.1 mg/ml to 50 mg/ml, preferably from 1 mg/ml to 20 mg/ml, concentrations of 1 mg/ml and 5 mg/ml being particularly appropriate.
Suitable packaging for the anthracycline glycoside solutions may be all approved containers intended for parenteral use, such as plastic and glass containers, ready-to-use syringes and the like. Preferably the container is a sealed glass container, e.g. a vial or an ampoule. A hermetically sealed glass vial is particularly preferred.
According to a particularly preferred feature of the invention, there is provided, in a sealed glass container, a sterile, pyrogen-free, injectable doxorubicin solution which consists essentially of a physiologically acceptable salt of doxorubicin dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent therefor, which has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate and which has a pH of from 2.5 to 3.5.
In the above indicated preferred feature of the invention the physiologically acceptable salt of doxorubicin may be, e.g. the salt with a mineral inorganic acid such as hydrochloric, hydrobromic, sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric and the like, or the salt with an organic acid such as acetic, succinic, tartaric, ascorbic, citric, glutamic, benzoic, methanesulfonic, ethanesulfonic and the like. The hydrochloride salt is a particularly preferred salt.
For the solution hereabove indicated as a preferred feature of the invention suitable solvents, co-solubilizing agents, tonicity adjustment agents, stabilizing agents and preservatives may be the same as those previously recited in this specification. Water is a particularly preferred solvent.
Also, the physiologically acceptable acid which is added to adjust the pH to from 2.5 to about 3.5 may be one of those previously specified. When it is desired to adjust the pH of the above said preferred solution to a value of from 2.5 to about 3.5, hydrochloric acid is an especially preferred acid. Preferred pH values for the above said preferred solutions of the invention are from about 2.7 to about 3.3.
Though the concentration of doxorubicin in the above preferred feature may vary within the broad range from 0.1 mg/ml to 100 mg/ml, preferred concentrations are from 2 mg/ml to 50 mg/ml, most preferably from 2 mg/ml to 20 mg/ml: examples of especially preferred concentrations of doxorubicin are 2 mg/ml and 5 mg/ml.
The invention also provides a process for producing a sterile, pyrogen-free anthracycline glycoside solution with a pH of from 2.5 to 3.5 which process comprises dissolving a physiologically acceptable salt of the anthracycline glycoside, which salt is not in the form of a lyophilizate, in a physiologically acceptable solvent therefor; adding a physiologically acceptable acid or buffer to adjust the pH within the said range as desired; and passing the resulting solution through a sterilizing filter.
One or more additional components such as co-solubilizing agents, tonicity adjustment agents, stabilizing agents and preservatives, for instance of the kind previously specified, may be added to the solution prior to passing the solution through the sterilizing filter.
With the solutions of the invention it is possible to obtain compositions having a very high concentration of the anthracycline glycoside active substance even at 50 mg/ml and more. This constitutes a great advantage over the presently available lyophilized preparations wherein high concentrations of anthracycline glycoside can only be obtained with difficulty because of solubilization problems encountered in reconstitution, mainly with saline. The presence of the excipient, e.g. lactose, in the lyophilized cake, and its generally high proportion in respect of the active substance, even up to 5 parts of excipient per part of active substance, has a negative effect on solubilization so that difficulties may arise in obtaining dissolution of the lyophilized cake, especially for concentrations of anthracycline glycoside higher than 2 mg/ml.
The solution of the invention are characterized by a good stability. Solutions in various solvents and with different pH's and concentrations have been found to be stable for long periods at temperatures accepted for the storage of pharmaceutical preparations. This is illustrated in the Examples which follow.
Due to the well known anti-tumor activity of the anthracycline glycoside active drug substance, the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention are useful for treating tumors in both human and animal hosts. Examples of tumors that can be treated are, for instance, sarcomas, including osteogenic and soft tissue sarcomas, carcinomas, e.g., breast-, lung-, bladder-, thyroid-, prostate- and ovarian carcinoma, lymphomas, including Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, neuroblastoma, melanoma, myeloma, Wilms tumor, and leukemias, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloblastic leukemia. See Kirk-Othmer's Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Volume 5, pages 478-479 (1979).
Examples of specific tumors that can be treated are Moloney Sarcoma Virus, Sarcoma 180 Ascites, solid Sarcoma 180, gross transplantable leukemia, L 1210 leukemia and lymphocytic P 388 leukemia.
Thus, according to the invention there is also provided a method of inhibiting the growth of a tumor, in particular one of those indicated above, which comprises administering to a host suffering from said tumor an injectable solution according to the invention containing the active drug substance in an amount sufficient to inhibit the growth of said tumor.
The injectable solutions of the invention are administered by rapid intravenous injection or infusion according to a variety of possible dose schedules. A suitable dose schedule for doxorubicin may be, for example, of 60 to 75 mg of active drug substance per m.sup.2 of body surface given as a single rapid infusion and repeated at 21 days; an alternative schedule may be of 30 mg/m.sup.2 per day by intravenous route for 3 days, every 28 days. Suitable dosages for 4'-epi-doxorubicin and 4'-desoxy-doxorubicin may be, for instance, of 75 to 90 mg/m.sup.2 given in a single infusion to be repeated at 21 days, and similar dosages may be useful also for 4'-desoxy-4'-iodo-doxorubicin.
Idarubicin, i.e. 4-demethoxy-daunorubicin, may be administered intravenously at a single dose of 13-15 mg/m.sup.2 every 21 days in the treatment of solid tumors, while in the treatment of leukemias a preferred dose schedule is, e.g., of 10-12 mg/m.sup.2 day be intravenous route for 3 days, to be repeated evry 15-21 days; similar dosages may be followed also for daunorubicin.
EXAMPLES
The invention now being generally described, the same will be better understood by reference to certain specific examples which are included herein for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to be limiting of the invention or any embodiment thereof, unless specified.
With reference to the first three examples, the stability controls on the ready-to-use solutions were carried out by means of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), at the following experimental conditions:
Liquid chromatograph: Varian model 5010
Spectrophotometric detector: Knauer model 8700
Integrating recorder: Varian model CDS 401
Injection valve: Rheodyne model 7125 fitted with a 10 mcl sample loop
Chromatographic column: Waters .mu.-Bondapak C18 (length=300 mm; inner diameter=3.9 mm; average particle size=10 mcm)
Column temperature: ambient (about 22.degree. C..+-.2.degree. C.)
Mobile phase: water:acetonitrile (69:31 v/v) adjusted to pH 2 with phosphoric acid, filtered (sintered glass filter, 1 mcm or finer porosity) and deaerated
Mobile phase flow rate: 1.5 ml/min
Analytical wavelength: 254.+-.1 nm
Integrating recorder sensitivity: 512
Chart speed: 1 cm/min
At these conditions, the peak of the anthracycline glycoside showed a retention time of about 6 minutes.
The obtained results are reported in Tables accompanying Examples 1-3.
The extrapolation of the analytical data in order to determine the time when the 90% of the initial assay could be expected (t.sub.90 value) was made following an Arrhenius plot.
This procedure of analytical data treatment is well known and widely used and described in the art: see e.g., Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals, Kennet A. Connors, Gordon L. Amidon, Lloyd Kennon, Publ. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 1979.
The term "teflon" recurring in the examples refers to "Teflon.TM.".
Example 1
______________________________________Composition for 80 vials (for 1 vial)______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 0.8 g (10 mg)Water for injections 0.4 l (5 ml)q.s. to______________________________________
Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl (0.80 g) was dissolved in 90 percent of the amount of water for injections, de-aerated by nitrogen bubbling. The pH of the solution was not adjusted. Further de-aerated water for injections was then added to bring the solution to its final volume (0.40 l).
The solution was filtered through a 0.22.mu. microporous membrane under nitrogen pressure. Volumes of 5 ml of the solution were distributed into type I-colorless glass vials having 5/7 ml capacity. The vials were then closed with chlorobutyl teflon-faced rubber stoppers and sealed with aluminum caps.
The stability of the solutions in the vials was tested. The vials were stored at temperatures of 55.degree. C., 45.degree. C. and 35.degree. C. (accelerated stability controls) and at 4.degree. C. for up to 3 weeks (55.degree. C.), 4 weeks (45.degree. C. and 35.degree. C.) and 12 weeks (4.degree. C.).
The stability data obtained, using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the determination of potency, are reported in the following Table 1:
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________INITIAL VALUESConcentration: 1.994 mg/mlpH = 5.2Relative % Assay: 100.0TEMPERATURE4.degree. C. 35.degree. C. 45.degree. C. 55.degree. C.TIME Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. %(weeks) mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay__________________________________________________________________________1 1.992 99.9 1.917 96.1 1.768 88.7 1.493 75.02 1.843 92.4 1.618 81.1 1.166 58.53 1.774 89.0 1.506 75.5 0.830 41.64 1.974 99.0 1.720 86.3 1.393 69.912 1.980 99.3__________________________________________________________________________ t.sub.90 (days) extrapolated according to Arrhenius equation: t.sub.90 at 4.degree. C. = 815 days t.sub.90 at 8.degree. C. = 480 days
Similar stability data can be observed also for analogous solutions containing either doxorubicin hydrochloride at 5 mg/ml concentration, or 4'-epi-doxorubicin, 4'-desoxy-doxorubicin, 4'-desoxy-4'-iodo-doxorubicin, daunorubicin or 4-demethoxy-daunorubicin, as hydrochloride salts, at both 2 mg/ml and 5 mg/ml concentration.
Example 2
______________________________________Composition for 80 vials (for 1 vial)______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 0.8 g (10 mg)Hydrochloric acid 0.1N pH = 3 (pH = 3)q.s. toWater for injections 0.4 l (5 ml)q.s. to______________________________________
Doxorubicin.HCl (0.8 g) was dissolved in 90 percent of the amount of water for injections, de-aerated by nitrogen bubbling. The hydrochloric acid was then added dropwise to adjust the pH of the solution to 3. Further de-aerated water for injections was then added to bring the solution to its final volume (0.4 l).
The solution was filtered through a 0.22.mu. microporous membrane under nitrogen pressure. Volumes of 5 ml of the solution were distributed into type I-colorless glass vials having 5/7 ml capacity. The vials were then closed with chlorobutyl teflon-faced rubber stoppers and sealed with aluminum caps.
The stability of the solutions in the vials was tested. The vials were stored at temperatures of 55.degree. C., 45.degree. C. and 35.degree. C. (accelerated stability controls) and at 4.degree. C. for up to 3 weeks (55.degree. C.), 4 weeks (45.degree. C. and 35.degree. C.) and 12 weeks (4.degree. C.).
The stability data obtained, using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the determination of potency, are reported in the following Table 2:
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________INITIAL VALUESConcentration: 1.992 mg/mlpH = 3.0Relative % Assay: 100.0TEMPERATURE4.degree. C. 35.degree. C. 45.degree. C. 55.degree. C.TIME Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. %(weeks) mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay__________________________________________________________________________1 1.995 100.2 1.952 98.0 1.919 96.3 1.493 75.02 1.889 94.8 1.851 92.9 1.036 51.93 1.876 94.2 1.565 78.6 0.730 36.74 1.979 99.4 1.808 90.8 1.393 69.912 1.972 99.0__________________________________________________________________________ t.sub.90 (days) extrapolated according to Arrhenius equation: t.sub.90 at 4.degree. C. = 3970 days t.sub.90 at 8.degree. C. = 2000 days
Similar stability data can be observed also for analogous solutions containing either doxorubicin hydrochloride at 5 mg/ml concentration, or 4'-epi-doxorubicin, 4'-desoxy-doxorubicin, 4'-desoxy-4'-iodo-doxorubicin, daunorubicin or 4-demethoxy-daunorubicin, as hydrochloride salts, at both 2 mg/ml and 5 mg/ml concentration.
Example 3
______________________________________Composition for 80 vials (for 1 vial)______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 8.0 g (100 mg)Hydrochloric acid 0.1N pH = 3 (pH = 3)q.s. toWater injections 0.41 (5 ml)q.s. to______________________________________
Doxorubicin.HCl (8.0 g) was dissolved in 90 percent of the amount of water for injections, de-aerated by nitrogen bubbling. The hydrochloric acid was then added dropwise to adjust the pH of the solution 3. Further de-aerated water for injections was then added to bring the solution to its final volume (0.4 l).
The solution was filtered through a 0.22.mu. microporous membrane under nitrogen pressure. Volumes of 5 ml of the solution were distributed into type I-colorless glass vials having 5/7 ml capacity. The vials were then closed with chlorobutyl teflon-faced rubber stoppers and sealed with aluminum caps.
The stability of the solutions in the vials was tested. The vials were stored at temperatures of 55.degree. C., 45.degree. C. and 35.degree. C. (accelerated stability controls) and at 4.degree. C. for up to 3 weeks (55.degree. C.), 4 weeks (45.degree. C. and 35.degree. C.) and 12 weeks (4.degree. C.).
The stability data obtained, using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the determination of potency, are reported in the following Table 3:
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________INITIAL VALUESConcentration: 20.06 mg/mlpH = 2.95Relative % Assay: 100.0TEMPERATURE4.degree. C. 35.degree. C. 45.degree. C. 55.degree. C.TIME Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. % Conc. Rel. %(weeks) mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay mg/ml Assay__________________________________________________________________________1 20.06 100.0 19.56 97.5 17.84 88.9 12.31 61.42 18.87 94.1 15.61 77.8 7.09 35.33 18.24 90.9 13.41 66.8 3.13 15.64 19.91 99.2 17.51 87.3 11.07 55.212 19.80 98.7__________________________________________________________________________ t.sub.90 (days) extrapolated according to Arrhenius equation: t.sub.90 at 4.degree. C. = 3700 days t.sub.90 at 8.degree. C. = 1780 days
Similar stability data can be observed for analogous solutions containing 4'-epi-doxorubicin or 4'-desoxy-doxorubicin, as hydrochloride salts, at the same 20 mg/ml concentration.
The following examples regarding stability profile and shelf-life forecasts were carried out under accelerated temperature conditions on 5.0 ml of 2 mg/ml doxorubicin.HCl solutions in a container-closure system consisting of: glass type I, 8 ml top capacity vial; teflon-faced chlorobutyl rubber bung; aluminum seal.
pH-Stability Profile at 55.degree. C. of Doxorubicin.HCl Solutions in Sterile Water 5% Dextrose, 0.9% Saline
2 mg/ml doxorubicin.HCl solutions were prepared in the following I=0.05 buffers: a) glycine.HCl pH 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0; b) formate pH 3.5; c) acetate pH 4.0, 5.0 and 5.5.
5.0 ml of each solution in glass vials were stored at 55.degree. C. and analyzed at prefixed times (up to 120 hours) for doxorubicin.HCl assay and pH.
Tables 4, 5 and 6 give the doxorubicin.HCl residual concentration and percent stability at 55.degree. C., at different pH's and times of storage for sterile water, 5% dextrose and 0.9% saline solutions, respectively.
The doxorubicin.HCl assays are the mean of three independent determinations performed by the USP HPLC method (USP XXI). At each pH value, the pseudo-first order rate constants (K.sub.obs) for the degradation were calculated by linear regression analysis of the natural logarithm of the residual concentration of doxorubicin.HCl (.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.t) versus time as depicted by the following equation:
ln .vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.t =ln .vertline.Dx.vertline.-K.sub.obs .multidot.t
J. Thuro Carstensen, Theory of Pharmaceutical Systems, Volume 1/General Principles, page 172, Academic Press, New York and London 1972
Kenneth A. Connors, Gordon L. Amidon, Lloyd Kennon, Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals, chapter 2, John Wiley and Sons, New York 1979
Arthur Osol, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16th Edition, chapter 18, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, Pa. 1980
Valentino J. Stella, Chemical and Physical Bases Determining the Instability and Incompatibility of Formulated Injectable Drugs, Journal of Parenteral Sciences & Technology, July-August 1986, page 142
Tables 7, 8 and 9 give the observed rate constants (K.sub.obs) for the degradation kinetics of doxorubicin.HCl at 55.degree. C. and at different pH's for sterile water, 5% dextrose and 0.9% saline solutions, respectively.
FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 show the K.sub.obs -pH profile for the doxorubicin.HCl degradation at 55.degree. C. in the above mentioned media. The data in Tables 4-9 and the FIGS. 1-3 evidence that the 2 mg/ml doxorubicin.HCl solutions show at 55.degree. C. the maximum stability in the pH range about 3.0-3.5 (.+-.0.2, e.g., 2.8, 3.2 and 3.3, 3.7) for all the three media tested. The range of from 2.5 to 3.0 is also a range of notable stability.
A common behavior as to stability is thus evidenced for aqueous solutions in general, since no practical differences in stability are observed when going from sterile water as such to sterile water containing a tonicity adjustment agent, either ionic, such as, e.g., sodium chloride, or non-ionic, such as, e.g., dextrose.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Accelerated (55.degree. C.) stability data of 2 mg/ml doxorubicin.HClsolutions in sterile water at various pHs Time (hours)Buffers Tests 0 8 16 24 48 72 120__________________________________________________________________________ Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 2.0 mg/ml 2.022 1.892 1.669 1.555 1.145 0.801glycine-HCl % stability 100.0 93.6 82.6 76.9 56.6 39.6 pH 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.01 2.01 2.02 Doxarubicin.HCl assaypH 2.5 mg/ml 1.992 1.926 1.835 1.718 1.557 1.00glycine-HCl % stability 100.0 96.7 92.1 86.2 78.2 50.2 pH 2.51 2.50 2.50 2.52 2.51 2.52 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 3.0 mg/ml 2.003 1.958 1.881 1.831 1.696 1.525 1.258glycine-HCl % stability 100.0 97.8 93.9 91.4 84.7 76.1 62.8 pH 3.00 3.03 3.02 3.02 3.01 3.02 3.00 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 3.5 mg/ml 2.035 1.950 1.887 1.840 1.650 1.538 1.241formate % stability 100.0 95.8 92.7 90.4 81.1 75.6 61.0 pH 3.51 3.51 3.51 3.51 3.52 3.52 3.51 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 4.0 mg/ml 2.032 1.788 1.681 1.561 1.167acetate % stability 100.0 88.0 82.7 76.8 57.4 pH 4.00 4.00 4.04 4.02 4.02 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 5.0 mg/ml 2.019 1.823 1.688 1.512 1.060acetate stability 100.0 90.3 83.6 74.9 52.5 pH 5.03 5.05 5.04 5.04 5.05 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 5.5 mg/ml 2.047 1.808 1.427 1.228 0.903acetate % stability 100.0 88.3 69.7 60.0 44.1 pH 5.50 5.53 5.53 5.54 5.56__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Accelerated (55.degree. C.) stability data of 2 mg/ml doxorubicin.HClsolutions in 5% dextrose at various pHs Time (hours)Buffers Tests 0 8 16 24 34 48 72 96 120__________________________________________________________________________ Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 2.0 mg/ml 1.993 1.851 1.683 1.513 1.361 1.078 0.765glycine-HCl % stability 100.0 92.8 84.11 75.9 68.3 54.1 38.4 pH 2.14 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.18 2.21 2.16 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 2.5 mg/ml 1.961 1.897 1.822 1.760 1.682 1.499 1.305glycine-HCl % stability 100.0 96.4 92.6 89.5 85.5 76.2 66.3 pH 2.56 2.56 2.56 2.58 2.60 2.56 2.61 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 3.0 mg/ml 1.975 1.908 1.832 1.645 1.508 1.344 1.206glycine-HCl % stability 100.0 96.6 92.7 83.3 76.4 68.0 61.1 pH 3.04 3.05 3.05 3.06 3.00 3.13 3.10 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 3.5 mg/ml 1.983 1.897 1.858 1.622 1.324 1.222formate % stability 100.0 95.7 93.7 81.8 66.8 61.6 pH 3.58 3.59 3.60 3.63 3.60 3.63 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 4.0 mg/ml 2.003 1.913 7.716 1.665 1.487 1.312 1.081acetate % stability 100.0 95.5 85.6 83.1 74.2 65.5 53.9 pH 4.10 4.10 4.11 4.11 4.16 4.15 4.12 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 5.0 mg/ml 2.012 1.906 1.673 1.608 1.416 1.163acetate % stability 100.0 94.7 83.2 79.9 70.4 57.8 pH 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.07 5.04 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 5.5 mg/ml 1.991 1.841 1.470 1.246 1.091acetate % stability 100.0 92.5 73.8 62.6 54.8 pH 5.56 5.54 5.48 5.50 5.46__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Accelerated (55.degree. C.) stability data of 2 mg/ml doxorubicin.HClsolutions in 0.9% saline at various pHs Time (hours)Buffers Tests 0 4 8 16 24 34 48 72 96 120__________________________________________________________________________ Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 2.0 mg/ml 1.998 1.857 1.580 1.397 1.231 0.931 0.101glycine- % stability 100.0 92.9 79.1 69.9 61.6 46.6 35.5 pH 2.16 2.16 2.18 2.16 2.22 2.20 2.19 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 2.5 mg/ml 1.946 1.875 1.670 1.602 1.368 1.132glycine-HCl % stability 100.0 96.3 85.8 82.3 70.3 58.1 pH 2.59 2.59 2.59 2.58 2.62 2.62 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 3.0 mg/ml 1.994 1.818 1.771 1.571 1.375 1.205 1.003glycine-HCl % stability 100.0 91.2 88.8 78.8 69.0 60.4 50.3 pH 3.06 3.07 3.07 3.08 3.13 3.14 3.12 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 3.5 mg/ml 1.997 1.824 1.742 1.543 1.323 1.176 0.919formate % stability 100.0 91.4 87.2 77.3 66.2 58.9 46.0 pH 3.58 3.56 3.56 3.66 3.61 3.64 3.63 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 4.0 mg/ml 1.972 1.885 1.828 1.653 1.594acetate % stability 100.0 95.6 92.7 83.8 80.8 pH 4.10 4.10 4.10 4.10 4.11 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 5.0 mg/ml 1.979 1.732 1.469 1.442 1.278acetate % stability 100.0 87.5 74.2 72.8 64.6 pH 5.04 5.06 5.04 5.05 5.05 Doxorubicin.HCl assaypH 5.5 mg/ml 2.023 1.847 1.548 1.330acetate % stability 100.0 91.3 76.5 65.7 pH 5.58 5.56 5.55 5.53__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 7______________________________________K.sub.obs values (1/days) for the degradation of doxorubicin.multidot.HCl2 mg/mlsolutions in sterile water at various pHs at 55.degree. C.Buffer pH K.sub.obs .times. 10.sup.3 95% confidence limits______________________________________Glycine-HCl 2.0 309.5 .+-.12.6(I = 0.05)Glycine-HCl 2.5 38.3 .+-.0.6(I = 0.05)Glycine-HCl 3.0 93.1 .+-.4.6(I = 0.05)Formate 3.5 96.7 .+-.4.4(I = 0.05)Acetate 4.0 269.8 .+-.18.7(I = 0.05)Acetate 5.0 322.6 .+-.19.2(I = 0.05)Acetate 5.5 415.4 .+-.45.7(I = 0.05)______________________________________
TABLE 8______________________________________K.sub.obs values (1/days) for the degradation of doxorubicin.multidot.HCl2 mg/mlsolutions in 5% dextrose at various pHs at 55.degree. C.Buffer pH K.sub.obs .times. 10.sup.3 95% confidence limits______________________________________Glycine-HCl 2.0 323.8 .+-.17.2(I = 0.05)Glycine-HCl 2.5 138.7 .+-.9.9(I = 0.05)Glycine-HC; 3.0 100.5 .+-.5.9(I = 0.05)Formate 3.5 132.0 .+-.20.7(I = 0.05)Acetate 4.0 209.7 .+-.12.7(I = 0.05)Acetate 5.0 273.1 .+-.27.7(I = 0.05)Acetate 5.5 453.7 .+-.59.2(I = 0.05)______________________________________
TABLE 9______________________________________K.sub.obs values (1/days) for the degradation doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 2mg/mlsolutions in 0.9% saline at various pHs at 55.degree. C.Buffer pH K.sub.obs .times. 10.sup.3 95% confidence limits______________________________________Glycine-HCl 2.0 362.4 .+-.19.4(I = 0.05)Glycine-HCl 2.5 276.5 .+-.30.2(I = 0.05)Glycine-HCl 3.0 133.2 .+-.8.0(I = 0.05)Formate 3.5 148.1 .+-.11.1(I = 0.05)Acetate 4.0 215.7 .+-.35.4(I = 0.05)Acetate 5.0 301.2 .+-.60.1(I = 0.05)Acetate 5.5 430.3 .+-.69.9(I = 0.05)______________________________________
Shelf-Life (t 90%) Forecast of Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml Sterile Water Solution Adjusted to pH 3.0
5.0 ml of doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml aqueous solution adjusted to pH 3.0 with 0.5 N HCl were stored, in glass vials, at:
a) 55.degree. C. for 21 days, b) 45.degree. C. and 35.degree. C. for 28 days, c) 27.degree. C. for 90 days.
At prefixed times the vials were analyzed for doxorubicin.HCl assay and pH.
The logarithmic plots of the residual concentration versus time were linear and indicated the degradation of the drug to follow pseudo-first order kinetics at constant pH and temperature.
The observed rate constants (K.sub.obs) for the degradation were calculated again by linear regression analysis of a plot of the natural logarithm of the residual concentration of doxorubicin.HCl (.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.t) versus time as depicted by the equation previously reported:
ln.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.t =ln.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.o -K.sub.obs .multidot.t
The Arrhenius equation for the degradation process was calculated from the K.sub.obs obtained from the different temperatures taken in account for the testing (table 11).
Applying the equation, the rate constants for the pseudo-first order reactions at 4.degree. C., 8.degree. C., 15.degree. C. and 27.degree. C. were calculated, together with the expected t.sub.90% at these temperatures.
Table 10 gives the doxorubicin.HCl residual concentration and percent stability at pH 3.0, at different temperatures and times of storage.
FIG. 4 gives the logarithm of the remaining doxorubicin.HCl concentration versus time at different temperatures.
The t.sub.90 % forecasts (table 11) show that a commercially meaningful shelf-life can be attributed to doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml pH 3.0 aqueous solution only if the product is stored in a refrigerator (between 2.degree. C. and 8.degree. C.).
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________Accelerated stability data of doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml pH 3.0 solutions insterile waterat different times and temperaturesStorage Time (days)temperature Tests 0 4 8 14 21 28 60 90__________________________________________________________________________ Doxorubicin.HCl assay27.degree. C. mg/ml 1.992 1.993 1.988 1.962 1.941 1.908 1.850 % stability 100.0 100.1 99.8 98.5 97.4 95.8 92.9 pH 3.00 2.95 2.94 2.95 2.94 2.96 2.93 Doxorubicin.HCl assay35.degree. C. mg/ml 1.992 1.985 1.952 1.889 1.816 1.808 % stability 100.0 99.6 98.0 94.8 94.2 90.8 pH 3.00 2.96 2.98 2.93 2.92 2.92 Doxorubicin.HCl assay45.degree. C. mg/ml 1.992 1.919 1.851 1.677 1.565 1.393 % stability 100.0 96.3 92.9 84.2 78.6 69.9 pH 3.00 2.91 2.95 2.85 2.92 2.90 Doxorubicin.HCl assay55.degree. C. mg/ml 1.992 1.160 1.493 1.036 0.730 % stability 100.0 88.4 74.9 52.0 36.6 pH 3.00 2.94 2.90 2.80 2.82__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 11______________________________________Arrhenius approach. Pseudo-first order rate constants,Arrhenius equation, calculated t.sub.90%______________________________________PSEUDO-FIRST ORDER RATE CONSTANTS,OBSERVED VALUES (K.sub.obs)Temperature K.sub.obs .times. 10.sup.3 (1/days) Correlation Coefficient______________________________________27.degree. C. 0.850 0.98635.degree. C. 3.506 0.98345.degree. C. 12.790 0.99555.degree. C. 49.340 0.995______________________________________ ARRHENIUS EQUATION FROM 27.degree. C., 35.degree. C., 45.degree. C. AND 55.degree. C. RATE CONSTANTS ##STR1## correlation coefficient = 0.9988
PSEUDO-FIRST ORDER RATE CONSTANTS,CALCULATED VALUES (K)Temperature K .multidot. 10.sup.3 (1/days) t.sub.90% (days) 95% confidence limits______________________________________ 4.degree. C. 0.019 5,652 3,079-10,380 8.degree. C. 0.038 2,745 1,603-4,69715.degree. C. 0.130 810 532-1,23827.degree. C. 0.918 115 89-147______________________________________
Shelf-Life (t 90%) Forecast of Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solution Adjusted to pH 3.0
5.0 ml of doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml solution in 0.9% sodium chloride adjusted to pH 3.0 with 0.5 N HCl were stored, in glass vials, at: a) 60.degree. C. for 4 days, b) 55.degree. C. for 14 days, c) 45.degree. C. for 21 days, d) 35.degree. C. for 28 days.
At prefixed times the vials were analyzed for doxorubicin.HCl assay and pH.
The logarithmic plots of the residual concentration versus time were linear and indicated the degradation of the drug to follow pseudo-first order kinetics at constant pH and temperature.
The observed rate constants (K.sub.obs) for the degradation were calculated again by linear regression analysis of a plot of the natural logarithm of the residual concentration of doxorubicin.HCl (.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.t) versus time as depicted by the equation previously reported:
ln.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.t =ln.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.o -K.sub.obs .multidot.t
The Arrhenius equation for the degradation process was calculated from the K.sub.obs obtained from the different temperatures taken in account for the testing (table 13).
Applying the equation, the rate constants for the pseudo-first order reactions at 4.degree. C., 8.degree. C., 15.degree. C. and 27.degree. C. were calculated, together with the expected t.sub.90% at these temperatures.
Table 12 gives the doxorubicin.HCl residual concentration and percent stability at pH 3.0, at different temperatures and times of storage.
FIG. 5 gives the logarithm of the remaining doxorubicin.HCl concentration versus time at different temperatures.
The t.sub.90 % forecasts (table 13) show that a commercially meaningful shelf-life can be attributed to doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml pH 3.0 solution in 0.9% sodium chloride only if the product is stored in a refrigerator (between 2.degree. C. and 8.degree. C.).
TABLE 12__________________________________________________________________________Accelerated stability data of doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml in 0.9% sodiumchloride at different times and temperaturesStorage Time (days)Conditions Tests 0 1 2 3 4 8 11 14 21 28__________________________________________________________________________ Doxorubicin.HCl assay35.degree. C. mg/ml 2.061 2.045 1.946 1.932 1.852 % stability 100.0 99.2 94.4 93.1 89.9 pH 3.05 2.98 2.92 2.92 2.98 Doxorubicin.HCl assay45.degree. C. mg/ml 2.061 1.996 1.724 1.517 1.344 % stability 100.0 96.5 83.6 73.6 65.2 pH 3.05 2.98 2.97 2.98 2.93 Doxorubicin.HCl assay55.degree. C. mg/ml 2.061 1.450 1.066 0.900 % stability 100.0 70.4 51.1 43.7 pH 3.05 2.90 2.97 2.95 Doxorubicin.HCl assay60.degree. C. mg/ml 2.061 1.722 1.481 1.290 1.050 % stability 100.0 84.5 71.9 62.6 50.9 pH 3.05 2.97 2.96 2.98 2.96__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 13______________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml pH 3.0 solution in 0.9% NaClArrhenius approach. Pseudo-first order rate constants,Arrhenius equation, calculated t.sub.90%______________________________________PSEUDO-FIRST ORDER RATE CONSTANTS,OBSERVED VALUES (K.sub.obs)Temperature K.sub.obs .times. 10.sup.3 (1/days) Correlation Coefficient______________________________________35.degree. C. 3.89 0.96545.degree. C. 21.61 0.98755.degree. C. 75.90 0.99660.degree. C. 164.90 0.998______________________________________ ARRHENIUS EQUATION FROM 35.degree. C., 45.degree. C., 55.degree. C. AND 60.degree. C. RATE CONSTANTS ##STR2## correlation coefficient = 0.9986
PSEUDO-FIRST ORDER RATE CONSTANTS,CALCULATED VALUES (K)Temperature K .times. 10.sup.3 (1/days) t.sub.90% (days) 95% confidence limits______________________________________ 4.degree. C. 0.017 6,166 1,670-22,756 8.degree. C. 0.037 2,838 861-9,35115.degree. C. 0.137 768 281-2,10527.degree. C. 1.112 94 45-197______________________________________
Shelf-Life (t 90%) Forecast of Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml Solution in 5% Dextrose Adjusted to pH 3.0
5.0 ml of doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml solution in 5% dextrose adjusted to pH 3.0 with 0.5 N HCl were stored, in glass vials, at: a) 60.degree. C. for 8 days, b) 55.degree. C. for 17 days, c) 45.degree. C. and 35.degree. C. for 28 days.
At prefixed times the vials were analyzed for doxorubicin.HCl assay and pH.
The logarithmic plots of the residual concentration versus time were linear and indicated the degradation of the drug to follow pseudo-first order kinetics at constant pH and temperature. The observed rate constants (K.sub.obs) for the degradation was calculated again by linear regression analysis of a plot of the natural logarithm of the residual concentration of doxorubicin.HCl (.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.t) versus time as depicted by the equation previously reported:
ln.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.t =ln.vertline.Dx.vertline..sub.o -K.sub.obs .multidot.t
The Arrhenius equation for the degradation process was calculated from the K.sub.obs obtained from the different temperatures taken in account for the testing (table 15).
Applying the equation, the rate constants for the pseudo-first order reactions at 4.degree. C., 8.degree. C., and 15.degree. C. and 27.degree. C. were calculated, together with the expected t.sub.90% at these temperatures.
Table 14 gives the doxorubicin.HCl residual concentration and percent stability at pH 3.0, at different temperatures and times of storage.
FIG. 6 gives the logarithm of the remaining doxorubicin.HCl concentration versus time at different temperatures.
The t.sub.90 % forecasts (table 15) show that a commercially meaningful shelf-life can be attributed to doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml pH 3.0 5% dextrose solution only if the product is stored in a refrigerator (between 2.degree. C. and 8.degree. C.).
TABLE 14__________________________________________________________________________Accelerated stability data of doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml pH 3.0 solution in5% dextroseat different times and temperaturesStorage Time (days)Conditions Tests 0 2 4 6 8 11 14 17 21 28__________________________________________________________________________ Doxorubicin.HCl assay35.degree. C. mg/ml 2.114 2.044 2.034 2.015 1.934 1.859 % stability 100.0 96.7 96.2 53.3 91.5 87.9 pH 3.02 2.98 2.94 2.95 2.90 2.94 Doxorubicin.HCl assay45.degree. C. mg/ml 2.114 1.940 1.870 1.684 1.510 1.410 % stability 100.0 91.8 88.5 79.7 71.5 66.7 pH 3.02 2.91 2.98 2.95 2.96 2.96 Doxorubicin.HCl assay55.degree. C. mg/ml 2.114 1.718 1.415 1.112 0.957 0.796 % stability 100.0 81.3 66.9 52.6 45.3 37.7 pH 3.02 2.95 2.92 2.99 2.91 2.95 Doxorubicin.HCl assay60.degree. C. mg/ml 2.114 1.752 1.393 1.176 0.925 % stability 100.0 82.9 65.9 55.7 43.8 pH 3.02 2.96 2.98 2.96 2.97__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 15______________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml pH 3.0 solution in 5% dextrose.Arrhenius approach. Pseudo-first order rate constants,Arrhenius equation, calculated t.sub.90%______________________________________PSEUDO-FIRST ORDER RATE CONSTANTS,OBSERVED VALUES (K.sub.obs)Temperature K.sub.obs .times. 10.sup.3 (1/days) Correlation Coefficient______________________________________35.degree. C. 4.190 0.99045.degree. C. 14.55 0.99555.degree. C. 58.11 0.99860.degree. C. 102.6 0.999______________________________________ ARRHENIUS EQUATION FROM 35.degree. C., 45.degree. C., 55.degree. C. AND 60.degree. C. RATE CONSTANTS ##STR3## correlation coefficient = 0.9993
PSEUDO-FIRST ORDER RATE CONSTANTS,CALCULATED VALUES (K)Temperature K .times. 10.sup.3 (1/days) t.sub.90% (days) 95% confidence limits______________________________________ 4.degree. C. 0.0326 3,218 1,463-7,082 8.degree. C. 0.0645 1,628 792-3,34415.degree. C. 0.203 516 281-94927.degree. C. 1.283 82 53-128______________________________________
Long Term Stability of Doxorubicin Formulations having a pH Falling within the Range from 2.5 to 3.5
Batches tested, formulations tested and packaging used are reported on, respectively, tables 16, 17 and 18, as well as on, respectively, tables 25, 26 and 27.
Test and Methods
The formulations were tested as regards appearance, clarity of solution, pH, sterility (8.degree. C., yearly), doxorubicin.HCl assay.
Test Methods
For appearance and clarity; visual inspection
For pH: USP XXI
For sterility; USP XXI (membrane filtration)
For doxorubicin.HCl assay: HPLC ion-pair method and USP HPLC method (USP XXI)
Brief description of the HPLC ion-pair method for doxorubicin.
HCl assay:
Column filling: reverse phase, Zortax TMS
Mobile phase: water, acetonitrile, methanol (54:29:17 v/v/v) containing 2 ml/l 85% phosphoric acid and 1 mg/ml sodium laurylsulfate (pairing agent) adjusted to pH 3.5 with 2N NaOH
Mobile phase flow rate: 1.5 ml/min
Column temperature: ambient (22.degree. C..+-.2.degree. C.)
Analytical wavelength: 254 nm
System suitability parameters: Symmetry factor between 0.7 and 1.2; number of theoretical plates.gtoreq.2500; measurement reproducibility: variation coefficient<1, n=6; resolution factor.gtoreq.12
The HPLC ion-pair method for doxorubicin.HCl assay is validated for accuracy, precision, linearity, sensitivity, specificity and stability-indicating nature.
The results obtained for:
percent doxorubicin.HCl stability (ion-pair method) and
pH
referred to the vials stored in upright position are given in:
Table 19 storage at -20.degree.
Tables 20 and 28 storage at +4.degree. C.
Tables 21 and 29 storage at +8.degree. C.
Tables 22 and 30 storage at +15.degree. C.
Tables 23 and 31 storage at +27.degree. C.
Table 24 storage at 100 and 250 foot candles
Table 32 storage at 250 foot candles.
The doxorubicin.HCl assays given in these tables are the mean of three independent determinations.
As far as the other parameters checked during stability:
the clarity of the solution was unchanged at all the checks carried out at all the storage conditions applied;
the appearance of the solutions was: a) unchanged at all the checks carried out on samples stored at 4.degree. C. and 8.degree. C., b) slightly darkened after: 9 months at 15.degree. C., 3 months at 27.degree. C., 3 months at 100 and 250 foot candles light;
the closure system was unchanged at all the checks carried out at all the storage conditions;
the sterility was maintained after 18 months at 8.degree. C.
The results of the controls carried out on the vials stored in inverted position do not differ significantly from those on the vials in upright position.
The percent doxorubicin.HCl stability values obtained by the USP HPLC method do not differ significantly from those obtained by the HPLC ion-pair method given in Tables 19-24.
The obtained stability data indicate that the tested doxorubicin.HCl solutions having different pH values within the range from 2.5 to 3.5 reach the lower limit of acceptance (90% of nominal concentration) in about 9 and 2-3 months at 15.degree. C. and, respectively 27.degree. C., but prove stable up to 18 months at 4.degree. C. and 8.degree. C., i.e. at temperature usually adopted for the storage of the products under refrigeration.
In distinct contrast, the doxorubicin.HCl solution obtained upon reconstitution of the commercial freeze-dried preparate, whose pH varies between 4.5 and 6, shows a much lower degree of stability as shown by the fact that it is recommended to discard reconstituted solutions after only 48 hours storage in refrigerator according to the leaflet accompanying packages of Adriamycin (i.e. doxorubicin.HCl) in the United States.
TABLE 16__________________________________________________________________________Stability studies. Batches tested.Batch Batch No.Characteristics TF/23049 TF/23077 TF/23078 TF/23117 TF/23119 H0001 L0001 M0001__________________________________________________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 10 10 10 20 50 10 20 50per vial (mg)pH 3.06 2.81 3.50 2.97 3.08 3.15 3.05 3.20Formulation No. F16804/IL1 F16804/IL1 F16804/IL1 F16804/IL2 F16804/IL3 F16804/IL4 F16804/IL5 F16804/IL6Batch size 700 400 400 500 500 2,400 2,300 2,400No. of vials__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 17__________________________________________________________________________Stability studies. Formulations tested.Composition Formulation numberper vial F16804/IL1 F16804/IL2 F16804/IL3 F16804/IL4 F16804/IL5 F16804/IL6__________________________________________________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 10 20 50 10 20 50mgHydrochloric acid 2.8-3.5 2.8-3.5 2.8-3.5 2.8-3.5 2.8-3.5 2.8-3.5q.s. to pHWater q.s. to ml 5.0 10.0 25.0 5.0 10.0 25.0__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 18__________________________________________________________________________Stability studies. Packaging used. Batch No.Packaging TF/23049 TF/23077 TF/23078 TF/231117 TF/23119 H0001 L0001 M0001__________________________________________________________________________vial glass type I I I I I I I Ivial top 8 ml 8 ml 8 ml 14 ml 39 ml 10 ml 14 ml 39 mlcapacitystopper chlorobutyl chlorobutyl chlorobutyl chlorobutyl chlorobutyl chlorobutyl chlorobutyl chlorobutyl rubber, rubber, rubber, rubber, rubber, rubber, rubber, rubber, teflon-faced teflon-faced teflon-faced teflon-faced teflon-faced teflon-faced teflon-faced teflon-facedseal aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 19______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 2 mg/ml solution. Stability data at-20.degree. C. (vials stored upright) acquired up to 3 months. Time - MonthsBatch Dosage 0 1 3______________________________________H0001 doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 100 99.9 99.610 mg % stability pH 3.15 3.12 2.98L0001 doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 100 100.8 99.820 mg % stability pH 3.05 2.84 2.97M0001 doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 100 100.7 101.050 mg % stability pH 3.20 2.96 2.99______________________________________
TABLE 20______________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml solution.Stability data at 4.degree. C. (vials stored upright)acquired up to 18 monthsBatch Time MonthsDosage 0 1 3 6 9 12 18______________________________________TF/23049 * 100 99.9 100.6 98.3 98.2 97.7 96.910 mg ** 3.06 3.10 3.09 3.10 3.05 2.97 3.07TF/23077 * 100 101.7 99.3 97.9 98.0 99.810 mg ** 2.81 2.86 2.75 2.65 2.67 2.76TF/23078 * 100 101.2 98.8 97.8 98.5 96.810 mg ** 3.50 3.54 3.49 3.44 3.43 3.54TF/23117 * 100 96.8 96.6 98.1 98.8 97.520 mg ** 2.97 2.98 2.92 2.86 2.95 2.98TF/23119 * 100 98.6 99.1 98.9 98.4 97.550 mg ** 3.08 2.98 2.98 2.89 2.99 3.00H0001 * 100 97.6 99.210 mg ** 3.15 n.d. 3.06 3.22L0001 * 100 98.8 98.420 mg ** 3.05 n.d. 2.99 2.94M0001 * 100 99.7 99.750 mg ** 3.20 n.d. 3.00 3.04______________________________________ *doxorubicin.HCl % stability **pH n.d. = not determined
TABLE 21__________________________________________________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml solution.Stability data at 8.degree. C. (vials stored upright)acquired up to 18 monthsBatch Time MonthsDosage 0 1 2 3 6 9 12 18__________________________________________________________________________TF/23049 * 100 99.7 100.1 96.5 96.1 96.5 95.410 mg ** 3.06 3.07 3.09 3.07 3.04 2.96 3.04TF/23077 * 100 102.1 101.6 97.5 96.6 95.010 mg ** 2.81 2.81 2.74 2.65 2.67 2.75TF/23078 * 100 98.3 97.7 96.5 95.9 98.810 mg ** 3.50 3.59 3.47 3.27 3.43 3.51TF/23117 * 100 95.7 95.8 97.8 96.2 95.520 mg ** 2.97 2.97 2.92 2.85 2.96 2.98TF/23119 * 100 97.6 97.8 96.2 97.3 96.850 mg ** 3.08 2.94 2.94 2.87 2.99 3.00H0001 * 100 98.2 99.4 96.4 96.710 mg ** 3.15 3.12 3.16 3.05 3.23L0001 * 100 100.6 99.1 98.1 98.320 mg ** 3.05 2.84 2.83 2.97 2.94M0001 * 100 100.3 100.6 98.7 99.050 mg ** 3.20 2.98 2.97 3.01 3.03__________________________________________________________________________ *doxorubicin.HCl % stability **pH
TABLE 22__________________________________________________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml solution.Stability data at 15.degree. C. (vials stored upright)acquired up to 12 monthsBatch Time MonthsDosage 0 0.5 1 2 3 6 9 12__________________________________________________________________________TF/23049 * 100 97.8 98.9 97.1 92.7 92.9 90.210 mg ** 3.06 3.03 3.07 3.10 3.08 3.02 2.95TF/23077 * 100 100.4 101.9 98.8 94.6 92.7 91.110 mg ** 2.81 2.81 2.85 2.71 2.63 2.67 2.74TF/23078 * 100 101.4 98.4 95.3 94.6 91.9 90.710 mg ** 3.50 3.51 3.58 3.47 3.38 3.41 3.47TF/23117 * 100 99.1 96.4 95.2 94.6 90.720 mg ** 2.97 2.95 2.95 2.90 2.81 2.95TF/23119 * 100 97.4 97.1 95.9 92.7 90.650 mg ** 3.08 2.99 2.95 2.91 2.87 2.98H0001 * 100 97.9 97.1 94.8 94.610 mg ** 3.15 3.12 3.16 3.06 3.23L0001 * 100 100.5 98.7 96.3 95.520 mg ** 3.05 2.85 2.87 2.98 2.96M0001 * 100 99.4 100.3 97.2 95.650 mg ** 3.20 2.96 2.94 3.01 3.04__________________________________________________________________________ *doxorubicin.HCl % stability **pH
TABLE 23______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 2 mg/ml solution.stability data at 27.degree. C. (vials stored upright)acquired up to 6 months.Batch TimeDosage Months 0 0.5 1 2 3 6______________________________________TF/23049 * 100 97.2 95.8 87.9 73.610 mg ** 3.06 2.98 3.07 3.08 3.03TF/23077 * 100 98.5 96.2 66.4 69.210 mg ** 2.81 2.80 2.85 2.71 2.64TF/23078 * 100 101.2 94.5 80.5 71.110 mg ** 3.50 3.51 3.58 3.38 3.13TF/23117 * 100 97.4 93.2 81.9 66.620 mg ** 2.97 2.95 2.94 2.88 2.77TF/23119 * 100 96.0 93.3 85.3 66.850 mg ** 3.08 2.97 2.97 2.91 2.82H0001 * 100 94.5 94.2 86.610 mg ** 3.15 3.10 3.09 3.01L0001 * 100 97.2 94.3 89.320 mg ** 3.05 2.84 2.85 2.96M0001 * 100 96.5 93.6 88.150 mg ** 3.20 2.95 2.95 2.99______________________________________ * doxorubicin.multidot.HCl % stability ** pH
TABLE 24__________________________________________________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml solution. Stability data at 100and 250 f.c. (vials stored inverted) acquired up to 3 months. 100 foot-candles 250 foot-candleeBatch Time MonthsDosage 0 0.5 1 3 0.5 1 2 3__________________________________________________________________________TF/23049 * 100 96.3 95.9 81.3 95.9 94.810 mg ** 3.06 3.05 3.05 3.06 2.99 3.04TF/23077 * 100 98.3 98.1 87.7 97.3 94.510 mg ** 2.81 2.79 2.84 2.70 2.79 2.84TF/23078 * 100 99.6 96.4 88.0 97.8 89.710 mg ** 3.50 3.50 3.58 3.39 3.47 3.53TF/23117 * 100 96.8 96.7 91.7 98.1 94.620 mg ** 2.97 2.93 2.95 2.87 2.95 2.93TF/23119 * 100 96.9 96.7 89.6 96.4 95.050 mg ** 3.08 2.96 2.95 2.93 2.96 2.97H0001 * 100 95.2 93.7 87.810 mg ** 3.15 3.10 3.06 2.97L0001 * 100 96.5 93.0 86.520 mg ** 3.05 2.84 2.85 2.97M0001 * 100 97.8 91.5 85.350 mg ** 3.20 2.95 2.94 2.99__________________________________________________________________________ *doxorubicin.HCl % stability **pH
TABLE 25______________________________________Stability studies. Batches tested.Batch Batch No.Characteristics P0001 Q0001 R0001______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 10 20 50per vial (mg)pH 3.00 3.00 3.00Formulation No. FI6804/IL7 FI6804/IL8 FI6804/IL9Batch size 2,400 2,200 2,500No. of vials______________________________________
TABLE 26______________________________________Stability studies. Formulations tested.Composition per Formulation numbervial F16804/IL7 F16804/IL8 F16804/IL9______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 10 20 50Hydrochloric acid 2.8-3.5 2.8-3.5 2.8-3.5q.s. to pH0.9% sodium chloride 5.0 10.0 25.0injection q.s. to ml______________________________________
TABLE 27______________________________________Stability studies. Packaging used. Batch No.Packaging P0001 Q0001 R0001______________________________________vial glass type I I Ivial top 10 ml 14 ml 39 mlcapacitystopper chlorobutyl chlorobutyl chlorobutyl rubber, rubber, rubber, teflon-faced teflon-faced teflon-facedseal aluminum aluminum aluminum______________________________________
TABLE 28______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.2 mg/ml solution in Salinefor Injection at pH=3. Stability data at4.degree. C. (vials stored upright) acquired up to 9and 12 months.Batch Time - MonthsDosage 0 3 6 9 12______________________________________ doxorubicin.multidot.HClP0001 % stability 100 98.3 98.0 99.210 mg pH 3.00 2.93 2.98 2.90 doxorubicin.multidot.HClQ0001 % stability 100 97.5 97.0 100.120 mg pH 3.01 3.06 3.03 3.00 doxorubicin.multidot.HClR0001 % stability 100 99.8 100.7 101.2 101.7 pH 3.02 3.08 3.15 3.14 3.10______________________________________
TABLE 29__________________________________________________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml solution in Saline for Injectionat pH = 3. Stability data at 8.degree. C. (vials stored upright)acquired up to 9 and 12 months.Batch Time - MonthsDosage 0 1 2 3 6 9 12__________________________________________________________________________ doxorubicin.HClP0001 % stability 100 101.0 100.6 97.9 97.4 96.810 mg pH 3.00 2.93 2.89 2.91 3.00 2.90 doxorubicin.HClQ0001 % stability 100 99.4 99.9 96.8 96.7 95.720 mg pH 3.01 3.02 3.01 3.05 3.02 3.00 doxorubicin.HClR0001 stability 100 99.8 99.8 98.4 98.5 99.5 100.950 mg pH 3.02 3.02 3.09 3.08 3.13 3.13 3.10__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 30__________________________________________________________________________Doxorubicin.HCl 2 mg/ml solution in Saline for Injectionat pH = 3. Stability data at 15.degree. C. (vials stored upright)acquired up to 9 and 12 months.Batch Time - MonthsDosage 0 1 2 3 6 9 12__________________________________________________________________________ doxorubicin.HClP0001 % stability 100 100.6 99.9 95.9 94.0 89.110 mg pH 3.00 2.93 2.89 2.90 2.99 2.90 doxorubicin.HClQ0001 % stability 100 98.6 97.8 95.1 96.4 89.820 mg pH 3.01 3.01 3.01 3.04 3.01 3.00 doxorubicin.HClR0001 % stability 100 98.8 97.5 97.6 94.7 96.0 94.550 mg pH 3.02 3.02 3.08 3.08 3.14 3.11 3.10__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 31______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 2 mg/ml solution in Salinefor Injection at pH=3. Stability data at27.degree. C. (vials stored upright) acquired up to3 months.Batch Time - MonthsDosage 0 1 2 3______________________________________ doxorubicin.multidot.HClP0001 % stability 100 98.3 95.0 84.910 mg pH 3.00 2.93 2.89 2.88 doxorubicin.multidot.HClQ0001 % stability 100 96.0 93.2 83.820 mg pH 3.01 3.01 2.99 3.03 doxorubicin.multidot.HClR0001 % stability 100 95.6 92.2 88.750 mg pH 3.02 3.02 3.06 3.05______________________________________
TABLE 32______________________________________Doxorubicin.multidot.HCl 2 mg/ml solution in Salinefor Injection at pH=3. Stability data atR.T. +250 f.c. (vials stored upright) acquiredup to 3 months.Batch Time - MonthsDosage 0 1 2 3______________________________________ doxorubicin.multidot.HClP0001 % stability 100 89.6 86.5 70.310 mg pH 3.00 2.92 2.86 2.84 doxorubicin.multidot.HClQ0001 % stability 100 91.1 84.5 72.720 mg pH 3.01 2.99 2.97 2.98 doxorubicin.multidot.HClR0001 % stability 100 96.0 91.4 86.650 mg pH 3.02 3.01 3.04 3.02______________________________________
TABLE 33______________________________________Stability Data of Doxorubicin Solution, 2 mg/mland a pH of 3.0 at 45.degree. C.Stabilizing Agent % Initialand Its Concentration 1 Wk 2 Wk 4 Wk 8 Wk______________________________________Water 87.8 75.9 53.8 25.55% Dextrose 91.1 82.3 65.6 38.85% Galactose 91.5 86.1 64.3 --5% Fructose 91.9 80.6 64.1 --4% .alpha.-L(-)-Fucose 91.2 81.9 63.8 --4% .alpha.-D(+)-Fucose 91.8 81.9 63.3 --1% Lactose 91.3 81.7 64.5 34.84% Dextran, MW 9,000 90.5 81.5 -- --4% Dextran, MW 506,000 92.0 84.0 -- --4% .alpha.-Cyclodextrin 91.7 84.3 -- --4% .beta.-Cyclodextrin 92.1 84.1 -- --4% .gamma.-Cyclodextrin 94.3 89.0 -- --5% Mannitol 90.7 81.4 65.8 41.15% Sorbitol 91.4 83.0 67.2 42.50.5% Thioglycerol 90.8 83.2 63.5 --5% Inositol 91.7 84.9 -- --5% Ethanol 92.2 85.6 -- --10% Glycerol 92.2 83.4 65.5 --______________________________________ Note: The same stabilizing effect may be seen for the above agents at lower concentrations, e.g., lower by up to 25-50 wt. %.
The invention now being fully described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as set forth herein.
Claims
  • 1. A physiologically acceptable solution of epirubicin hydrochloride dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent, having a pH adjusted to from 2.5 to 3.5 with a physiologically acceptable acid selected from the group consisting of hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, methanesulfonic acid, ethanesulfonic acid, tartaric acid, acetic acid, succinic acid, ascorbic acid, citric acid, and glutamic acid and the concentration of said epirubicin hydrochloride being from 0.1 to 100 mg/ml, wherein said solution has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate.
  • 2. The solution of claim 1 wherein the physiologically acceptable solvent is selected from the group consisting of water, ethanol, polyethylene glycol, dimethyl acetamide, and mixtures thereof.
  • 3. The solution of claim 1 wherein the physiologically acceptable solvent is water.
  • 4. The solution of claim 1 further comprising a tonicity adjusting agent.
  • 5. The solution of claim 1 wherein the concentration of epirubicin hydrochloride is from 0.1 to 50 mg/ml.
  • 6. The solution of claim 1 wherein the concentration of epirubicin hydrochloride is from 1 to 20 mg/ml.
  • 7. The solution of claim 1 wherein the pH of said solution is from about 2.7 to about 3.3.
  • 8. The solution of claim 1 wherein said physiologically acceptable solvent is a saline solution.
  • 9. The solution of claim 1 wherein said physiologically acceptable solvent is a dextrose solution.
  • 10. The solution of claim 1 wherein said physiologically acceptable solvent is sterile water.
  • 11. A physiologically acceptable aqueous solution of epirubicin hydrochloride dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent, having a pH adjusted to from 2.5 to 3.5 with a physiologically acceptable acid and the concentration of said epirubicin hydrochloride being from 0.1 to 100 mg/ml, wherein said solution has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate.
  • 12. A physiologically acceptable solution of epirubicin hydrochloride dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent, having a pH adjusted to from 2.5 to 3.5 with a physiologically acceptable acid selected from the group consisting of hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, methanesulfonic acid, tartaric acid, and acetic acid and the concentration of said epirubicin hydrochloride being from 0.1 to 100 mg/ml, wherein said solution has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate.
  • 13. A storage stable physiologically acceptable aqueous solution of epirubicin hydrochloride dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent, having a pH adjusted to from about 2.7 to about 3.3 with a physiologically acceptable acid and the concentration of said epirubicin hydrochloride being from 0.1 to 100 mg/ml.
  • 14. A storage stable physiologically acceptable solution of epirubicin hydrochloride dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent, having a pH adjusted to from about 2.7 to 3.3 with a physiologically acceptable acid selected from the group consisting of hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, methanesulfonic acid, tartaric acid and acetic acid and the concentration of said epirubicin hydrochloride being from 0.1 to 100 mg/ml.
  • 15. A physiologically acceptable solution of epirubicin hydrochloride dissolved in a physiologically acceptable aqueous solvent, having a pH adjusted to from 2.5 to 3.5 with a physiologically acceptable acid selected from the group consisting of hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, methanesulfonic acid, ethanesulfonic acid, tartaric acid, acetic acid, succinic acid, ascorbic acid, citric acid, and glutamic acid and the concentration of said epirubicin hydrochloride being from 0.1 to 100 mg/ml.
  • 16. The solution of claim 15 further comprising a tonicity adjusting agent.
  • 17. The solution of claim 15 wherein the concentration of epirubicin hydrochloride is from 0.1 to 50 mg/ml.
  • 18. The solution of claim 15 wherein the concentration of epirubicin hydrochloride is from 1 to 20 mg/ml.
  • 19. The solution of claim 15 wherein the pH of said solution is from about 2.7 to about 3.3.
  • 20. The solution of claim 15 wherein said physiologically acceptable solvent is a saline solution.
  • 21. The solution of claim 15 wherein said physiologically acceptable solvent is a dextrose solution.
  • 22. The solution of claim 15 wherein said physiologically acceptable solvent is sterile water.
  • 23. A physiologically acceptable solution of epirubicin hydrochloride dissolved in a physiologically acceptable solvent, having a pH adjusted to from 2.5 to 3.5 with a physiologically acceptable acid selected from the group consisting of hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, methanesulfonic acid, and tartaric acid, the concentration of said epirubicin hydrochloride being from 0.1 to 100 mg/ml, wherein said solution is in a sealed container and has not been reconstituted from a lyophilizate in said container.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
8519452 Aug 1985 GBX
8629193 Dec 1986 GBX
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/368,402, filed Jan. 3, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,977,082, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/224,993, filed Apr. 8, 1994, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 07/827,938, filed Jan. 29, 1992, now abandoned, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 07/471,005, filed Jan. 25, 1990, U.S. Pat. No. 5,124,318, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 07/341,249, filed Apr. 20, 1989, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 07/064,653, filed Jun. 22, 1987, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 07/878,784, filed Jun. 26, 1986, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
3686163 Arcamrone et al. Aug 1972
4035566 Israel et al. Jul 1977
4039633 Zelinski Aug 1977
4039663 Arcamyone et al. Aug 1977
4039736 Rettleton, Jr. et al. Aug 1977
4109076 Henry et al. Aug 1978
4296105 Baurain et al. Oct 1981
4327087 Rosenkrantz et al. Apr 1982
4537593 Alchas Aug 1985
4564054 Gustavsson Jan 1986
4576211 Valentini et al. Mar 1986
4588403 Weiss et al. May 1986
4786281 Valentini et al. Nov 1988
4946831 Gatti et al. Aug 1990
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
1005760 Feb 1977 CAX
1041488 Oct 1978 CAX
1046508 Jan 1979 CAX
1046507 Jan 1979 CAX
1204738 May 1980 CAX
1129344 Aug 1982 CAX
1203482 Apr 1986 CAX
0 401 896 A1 Dec 1990 EPX
2405957 May 1979 FRX
35 36 896 Apr 1986 DEX
2178311 Feb 1987 GBX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (318)
Entry
Kano et al., Electrochemical Properties of Adriamycin Adsorbed on a Mercury Electrode Surface, The Chemical Society of Japan, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 57, 2383-2390 (1984).
Kano et al., The Effects of the pH and the Temperature on the Oxidation-reduction Properties of Adriamycin Adsorbed on a Mercury Electrode Surface, The Chemical Society of Japan, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 58, 424-428 (1985).
Beijnen et al. (1985), "Stability of Anthracycline Antitumor Agents in Infusion Fluids," J. Parenteral Science and Technology, vol. 39, pp 220-222.
Beijnen et al. (1986), "Aspects of Degradation Kinetics of Daunorubicin in Aqueous Solution," International J. Pharmaceutics, vol. 31, pp. 75-82.
Beijnen et al. (1986), "Aspects of the Degradation Kinetics of Doxorubicin in Aqueous Solution," International J. Of Pharmaceutics, vol. 32, pp. 123-131.
Bosanquet, A.G. (1986), "Stability of Solutions of Antineoplastic Agents During Preparation and Storage For In Vitro Assays," Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., vol. 17, pp. 1-10.
Daugherty et al. (1981), "Photolytic Destruction of Adriamycin," J. Pharm. Pharmacol., vol. 33, p. 556.
Dorr and Fritz (1980), "Doxorubicin," Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook, Elsevier, New York, pp. 388-401.
Eksborg and Ehrsson (1984), "Liquid Chromatography in Anticancer Drug Research with Special Reference to Anthraquinone Glycosides," J. Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, vol. 2, pp. 297-303.
Eksborg, S. (1978), "Extraction of Daunorubicin and Doxorubicin and Their Hydrox Metabolities: Self-Association in Aqueous Solution," J. Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 67, pp. 782-785.
Flora et al. (1980), "The Loss of Paraben Preservatives During Freeze Drying," J. Pharm. Pharmacol., vol. 32, pp. 577-578.
Florence and Atwood (1981), "Physicochemial Principles of Pharmacy" MacMillan Press, London, p. 475.
Garnick et al. (1983), "Clinical Evaluation of Long-Term, Continuous-Infusion Doxorubicin," Cancer Treatment Reports, vol. 67, pp. 133-142.
Henry, D. W. (1976), "Adriamycin," Cancer Chemotherapy, American Chemical Society Symposium Series, pp. 15-57.
Hoffman et al. (1979) "Stability of Refrigerated and Frozen Solutions of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride," Am. J. Hosp. Pharm., vol. 36, 1536-1538.
Janssen et al. (1985), "Doxorubicin Decomposition on Storage. Effect of pH, Type of Buffer and liposome Encapsulation," International J. Pharmaceutics, vol. 23, pp. 1-11.
Kaniewska, T. (1978), "Study of the Decomposition of Adriamycin," Chemical Abstracts, vol. 88, No. 197526x, p. 396.
Kaniewska, T. (1977), "A Study of Decomposition of Adriamycin," Pharmacia Polska, vol. 9, 539-542 (English translation attached).
Ketchum et al. (1981), "Cost Benefit and Stability Study of Doxorubicin Following Reconstitution," Am. J. Intravenous Therapy & Clinical Nutrition, vol. 8, pp. 15-18.
Kristensen and Moller (1983), "Alman Farmaci II," Dansk Farmaceutforeings Forlag Kobenhavn, pp. 408, 442, 447 (English translation attached).
Martindale (1982), "Doxorubicin Hydrochloride," The Extra Pharmacopeia, Antineoplastic Agents and Immunosuppressants, 28th Edition, The Pharmaceutical Press, London, J.E.F. Reynolds, Ed., pp. 205-208.
Masuike et al. (1984), "Determination of Adriamycin and Its Metabolites in Biological Samples Using High Performance Liquid Chromatograhy. I. Analysis of Serum and Plasma by Direct Injection Method," Yakugaku Zasshi, vol. 104, 614-619 (English abstract).
Masuike et al. (1984), "Determination of Adriamycin and Its Metabolites in Biological Samples Using High Performance Liquid Chromatograhy. II. Analysis of Tissues by Extraction Method," Yakugaku Zasshi, vol. 104, 620-623 (English abstract).
Menozzi et al. (1984), "Self-Association of Doxorubicin and Related Compounds in Aqueous Solution," J. Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 73, pp. 766-770.
Poochikian et al. (1981), "Stability of Anthracycline Antitumor Agents in Four Infusion Fluids," Am. J. Hospital Pharmacy, vol. 38, pp. 483-486.
Savlov et al. (1981), "Comparison of Doxoorubicin with Cycloleucine in the Treatment of Sarcomas," Cancer Treatment Reports, vol. 65, pp. 21-27.
Trissell (1980), "Doxorubicin HCI," Handbook of Injectable Drugs, Third Ed. (American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, Bethesda, MD), pp. 131-132.
Vigevani and Williamson (1980), "Doxorubicin," In Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances, Academic Press, New York, vol. 9, pp. 245-263, 246-274.
Williamson et al. (1983), "Doxorubicin Hydrochloride-Aluminum Interaction," Am. J. Hospital Pharmacy, vol. 40, p. 214.
Yu-Chang et al. (1980), "Review of Excipients and pH's for Parenteral Products Used in the United States," J. Parenteral Drug. Assoc., vol. 14, pp. 452-462.
Chemistry Industry, "Union Warns of Cancer Drug Dangers," Issue Jul. 4, 1983, p. 488.
Drug Topics, "Cancer Drug Danger," Feb. 7, 1983, p. 99.
Gutteridge and Wilkins (1983), "Doxorubicin Degradation: Changes in Activity Compared by Bacterial Growth Inhibition and Free Radical-Dependent Damage to Deoxyribose," J. Biological Standardization, vol. 11, pp. 359-364.
Akbiyik et al. (1979), "Total Lung Irradiation and Chemotheraphy in Pulmonary Metastases from Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix and Endometrium," J. Nat'l Medical Assn., vol. 71, pp. 1061-1063.
The Pharmaceutical Codex (1979), "Injections," The Pharmaceutical Press, London, 11th Edition, pp. 446-447.
Swinyard, E.A. (1980), "Introduction of New Drugs," Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pennsylvania, pp. 1365-1376.
The Merck Index (1983), "Doxorubicin," 10th Edition, Entry 3435, p. 3436.
Nikula et al. (1984), "Chromosome Aberrations in Lymphocytes of Nurses Handling Cytostatic Agents," Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, vol. 10, pp. 71-74.
U.S. Pharmacopoeia, "Doxorubicin Hydrochloride for Injection," 20th revision, p. 266.
U.S. Pharmacopoeia (1985), p. 119.
Formularium Der Nederlandse Apoethekers, Band V. (1983), p. I.8 I.24, I63-I.64a, I.82, I.88.
Yoo (1977), Section "Injections" in the Korean Pharmacopoeia, pp. 3, 48-49.
Harris, D. C. (1995), Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Fourth Edition, W.H. Freeman & Company, New York, pp. 234-241.
Jonkman-de Vries et al. (1994), "Pharmaceutical Development of a Parenteral Lyophilized Formulation of the Novel Indoloquinone Antitumor Agentd EO9," Cancer Chemother.Pharmacol., vol. 34, pp. 416-422.
The Merck Index (1989), "Hydrochloric Acid," S. Budavari, Ed., Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, No. 4703, p. 756.
The Merck Index (1989), "Aclacinomycins," S. Budavari, Edl, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, No. 108, p. 17.
Trissel, L.A. (1983), "Investigational Drugs," Handbook on Injectable Drugs, Third Edition, American Society of Hospital Pharmacists.
The Merck Index (1983), "Doxorubicin," 10th Edition, AN-3435, p. 499.
Europaischez Arzneibuch, vol. III, 1979, p. 654 (English translation attached).
Arcamone et al. (1972), "Structure and Physiochemical Properties of Adriamycin (Doxorubicin)," International Symposium on Adriamycin, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 9-22.
Beijnen, J.H. et al. (1985), "Aspects of the Chemical Stability of Doxorubicin and Seven Other Anthracyclines in Acidic Solution," Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition, vol. 7, pp. 109-116.
German Patent Office Decision dated Oct. 8, 1996 (English translation attached) revoking Patent No. 36 21844.
Wang and Kowal (1980), "Review of Excipients and pH's for Parenteral Products Used in the United States," J. of the Parenteral Drug Association, vol. 14, p. 452-462.
Harris, Daniel C. (1995), "Quantitative Chemical Analysis," 4.sup.th Edition, W.H. Freeman and Company.
Aracamone et al. (1969), "Adriamycin, 14-Hydroxydaunomycin, a New Antitumor Antibiotic from S. Peucetius Var. Caesius," Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. XI, pp. 1101-1110.
Despois et al. (1967), "Isolement D'un Nouvel Antibiotique Doue D'Activite Antitumorale: La Rubidomycine (13.057 R.P.) Identite De La Rubidomycine et de La Daunomycine," Path. Biol., vol. 15, pp. 887-891.
Lokich et al. (1983), "Constant Infusion Schedule for Adrimycin: A Phase I-II Clinical Trial of a 30-Day Schedule by Ambulatory Pump Delivery System," J. Clinical Oncology, vol. 1, pp. 24-28.
Wasserman and Bundgaard (1983), "Kinetics of the Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Doxorubicin," International J. Pharmaceutics, vol. 14, pp. 73-78.
Merck Index (1996), Mitoxantrone, 12th Edition, Entry 6303, p. 1064.
Martindale (1989), Mitotone, The Pharmaceutical Press, 29th Edition, London, Entry 1852-x, pp. 643-645.
ABPI Data Sheet Compendium, 1994-1995, "Novantron Injection," Lederle Laboratories, pp. 752-754.
Geigy Scientific Tables, vol. 3, Physical Chemistry Composition of Blood Hematology Somatometric Data, 8th revised and enlarged edition, Edited by C. Lentner, pp. 54-60.
Dorr (1979), "Incompatibilities with Parenteral Anticancer Drugs," The American Journal of Intravenous Therapy, Feb./Mar., pp. 42, 45-46, 52.
Beranrd, J., et al. (1969) Rubidomycin, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
Karlsen, J., et al. (1983), "Stability of Cytotoxic Intravenous Solutions Subjected to Freeze-Thaw Treatment", Nor. Pharm ACTA, vol. 45, pp. 61-67.
Vogelzang, N.J., et al. (1985), "Phase I Trial of an Implanted Battery-Powered, Programmable Drug Delivery System for Continuous Doxorubicin Administration," Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 3, No. 3 (Mar.), pp. 407-414.
Falk, K., et al. (1979), "Mutagenicity in Urine of Nurses Handling Cytostatic Drugs", The Lancet, Jun. 9, 1979, pp. 1250-1251.
"Union Warns of Cancer Drug Dangers", Chemistry and Industry, Jul. 4, 1983.
Lassila, O., et al. (1980), "Immune Function in Nurses Handling cytostatic Drugs", The Lancet, Aug. 30, 1980., p. 482.
Abstract of Medical Economics Co., Chemistry-Industry, Feb. 7, 1983, p. 99.
Chemical Abstract, vol. 99, p. 345 (1983), Abst. No. 99:218014y.
Tan, C. et al., Daunomycin, an Anti-Tumor Antibiotic, in the Treatment of Neoplastic Disease, Mar. 1967, Cancer 20:333-353.
Samuels, L.D. et al., "Daunorubicin Therapy in Advanced Neuroblastoma", Apr. 1971, Cancer 27:831-834.
Miller, A.A. and Schmidt, C.G., "Clinical Pharmacology and Toxocology of 4"-O-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin", Mar. 1, 1987, Cancer Research 47:1461-1465.
Rozencweig, M. et al., "Preliminary Experience with Marcellomycin: Pre-Clinical and Clinical Aspects" p. 5499-561.
The Interpharm International Dictionary of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, edited by Dean E. Snyder, Publisher Buffalo Grove, IL: Interpharm Press, Inc., 1992.
Merck Index, 10.sup.th edition 1983, p. 499, entry 3,435.
Bosanquet, "Stability of solutions of antineoplastic agents during preparation and storage for in vitro assays", Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 17, 1986, pp. 1-10.
Rolf Kaltofen, Joachim Ziemann et al., Tabellenbuch Chemie, 12.sup.th edition, pp. 172, 181.
Yuksel, "Determination of Ceftriaxone in Aqueous Humour and Serum Samples by Differential-pulse Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetry", Analyst, vol. 119, 1994, pp. 1575-1577.
Falbe et al., Rompp Chemie Lexikon, 9.sup.th edition, Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York, 1992, "Buffers", pp. 3677-3678.
Mortimer, Chemie, 3.sup.rd edition, Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York, 1980, pp. 490-494.
Bradner and Misiek, (1977) The Journal of Antibiotics, "Bohemic Acid Complex. Biological Characterization of the Antibiotics, Musettamycin and Marcellomycin," 30(6) 519-522.
Kjeld Ilver, Almen Galenisk Farmaci--Forel.ae butted.sningsnoter, Dansk Farmaceutforenings Forlag 1971, pp. 132-136. (English translation provided).
Gjelstrup et al. (1983), Almen Farmaaci I, Dansk Farmaceutforenings Forlag, K.o slashed.bonhavn, pp. 404-408, 440, 442-443, 447, 451. (English translation provided).
Erik Sandell, (1967), Galenisk Farmaci, 2.sup.nd edition, Stockholm, pp. 214. (English translation provided).
Erk Sandell, (1982), Galenisk Farmaci, 3.sup.rd edition, Stockholm, pp. 123. (English translation provided).
Svend Aage Schou & V. Gaun.o slashed. Jensen (1959), Tr.ae butted.k af den flaeniske farmaci, Store Nordiske Videnskabsboghandel, pp. 220. (English translation provided).
Arcamone, F. (1977), Lloydia, "New Antitumor Anthracyclines," 40(1):45-66.
Naff et al., (1982) Anthracycline Antibiotics, Anthracyclines in the National Cancer Institute Program, Hassan S. El Khadam, editor, Academic Press, pp. 1-57.
Formularium Der Nederlandse Apothekers, (1983) pp. I.8, I.24, I.63.
Formularium Der Nederlandse Apothekers, (1979) pp. I.64, I.82.
Formularium Der Nederlandse Apothekers, (1985) pp. I.64a.
Formularium Der Nederlandse Apothekers, (1989) pp. I.88.
Formularium Der Nederlandse Apothekers, (1992) pp. I.63a.
Bohme and Harke (1979), Europaisches Arzneibuch, Band III, Kommentar, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Stuttgart, pp. 654 (English translation provided).
Arcamone et al. (1972), "Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Adriamycin (Doxorubicin)," International Symposium on Adriamycin, pp. 9-22.
Wang and Kowal (1980), "Review of Excipients and pH's for Parenteral Products Used in the United States," Journal of the Parenteral Drug Association, pp. 452-462.
Harris, Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Fourth Edition, W.H. Freeman & Company, New York, pp. 240.
Bernard et al., editors (1969), Rubidomycin A New Agent Against Cancer, pp. ix-181.
Karlsen et al. (1983), "Stability of cytotixic intravenous solutions subjected to freeze-thaw treatment," Nor. Pharm. Acta, 45, 61-67.
Topics in Antibiotic Chemistry, 2, 109-115, 1978.
Young et al.. The Anthracycline Antineoplastic Drugs (1981) vol. 305(3) New England J. Med 139.
Casazza, Experimental Studies on New Anthracyclines (1984) (Proc. of Int. Symposium on Adriamycin: Ogawa et al. eds.).
Aubel Sadron et al., Daunorubicin and doxorubicin, anthracycline antibiotics, a physicochemical and biological review (1984) Biochemie 66, pp. 333-352.
Abdella et al., A Chemical perspective on the Anthracycline Antitumor Antibiotics, Env. Health Persp. vol. 64, pp. 3-18 (1985).
Arcamone, Daunomycin and Related Antibiotics. Topics in Antibiotic Chemistry. vol. 2 (Sammes, ed.) (1978).
Brown, Adriamycin and Related Anthracycline Antibiotics, Prog. Med. Chem. 15:124 (1978).
Goormagtigh et al., Anthracycline Glycoside-Membrane Interactions, Biochem. Biophys. Acta: 271-288 (1984).
Skovsgaard et al., Adrimycin, An Antitumor Antibiotic: A Review with Special Reference to Daunomycin, Dan. Med. Bull 22(2):62 (1975).
Bachur et al., Cellular pharmacodynamics of several anthracycline antibiotics (1976) J. Med. Chem 19(5):651.
Suarato, "Antitumor Anthracyclines", The Chemistry of Antiumour Agents (1990) (Wilman, ed.).
Legha; "The Anthracyclines and Mitoxantrone", Cancer Chemotheraphy by Infusion 2.sup.nd edition (Lokich et.) (1990) Precept Press.
Bouma et al., Anthracycline Antitumor agents: A review of physcicochemical, analytical and stability properties Pharm. Weekblad Sc. Ed., vol. 8, pp. 109 (1986).
Williams, Stability & Compatibility of Admixtures of Antineoplastic Drugs, Cancer Chemotherapyhy by Infusion. 2.sup.nd Edition (Lukich et.) (1990) Precept Press.
Williams et al., Photoinactivation of Anthracyclines (1981) Photochemistry & Photobiology, vol. 34, p. 131.
Poochikian et al., Stability of anthracycline antitumor agents in four infusion fluids (1981) Chemical Abstracts, vol. 94.214489f.
Keusters, et al., Stability of solutions of doxorubicin and epirubicin in plastic mini bags for intravesical use after storage at -20.degree. C. and thawing by microwave radiation. (1986) Pharm. Weekblad Sc.Ed. vol. 8 p. 144.
Bekers et al., Effect of cyclodextrins on anthracycline stability in acidic aqueous media (1988) Pharm. Weekblad. S. Ed., vol. 10.,207.
Wood, Mary Jayne: Stability of anthracycline cytotoxic agents in solution and infusion fluids--submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy (The University of Aston in Birmingham). Oct. 1988.
Wood et al., Stability of Doxorubicin, Daunorubicin and Epirubxcin in Plastic Syringes and Minibags (1990) J. Clin. Pharm. Therapeutics vol. 15. p. 279-289.
Crom et al., Pharmacokinetics of Anticancer Drugs in Children, Clin. Pharm. 12:pp. 168-213 (1987).
Greidanus, et al., "Continuous Infusion of Low-dose Doxorubicin, Epirubicin and Mitoxantrone", Cancer Chemotherapy: A Review, (1988) Pharm. Weekblad. Sci. Ed., vol. 10, pp. 237.
Bachur et al., Daunorubicin and adriamycin metabolism in the golden syrian hamster (1973) Biochem. Med. vol. 8, pp. 352.
Haneke et al., Quanititation of Daunorubicin, Doxorubicin, and their Aglycones by Ion-Pair Reversed-Phase Chromarography, J. Pharm. Sci. 70(10): 1112 (1981).
Tomlinson et al., Concomitant Adsorption and Stability of Sonic Anthracycline Antibiotics (Oct. 1982) 71 (10) J. Pharm Sci. 1121.
Von Hoff et al., Daunomycin: An Anthracycline Antibiotic Effective in Acute Leukemia, Adv. Pharm. Chemo. 15:1 (1978).
Cassinelli et al., La Daunomicina: Un Nuovo Antibiotico Ad Attivita Citostatica Isolamento E Proprieta (1963) Giorn. Microbial. 11:167.
Arcamone, La Constitution Chimique de la Daunomycine, Path. Biol. 15(19-20): 893 (1967).
Di Marco et al., Daunomycin, a New Antibiotic of the Rhodomycin Group, Nature 201: 706 (1964).
Angiuli et al., Structure of Daunomycin, X-Ray Analysis of N-Br-Acetyl-Daunomycin Solvate, Nature New Biol., 234:78 (Nov. 1971).
Trissel et al.; Investigational Drug Information (1978) Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm vol. 12, pp. 404.
Handbook on Injectable Drugs (Trissel) 2.sup.nd Ed. 1980,p. 562.
Handbook on Injectable Drugs (Trissel) 5.sup.th Edition (1988), p. 222-223.
AHFS Drug Information 1984, p. 249-250.
AHFS Drug Information 1990, p. 501-503.
Fischer et al., The Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook 3.sup.rd Edition (1989), p. 65-69.
Drug Information for the Health Care Professional USP DI 1991--11.sup.th Edition, p. 1080-1084.
Beijnen, et al., Structure Elucidation and Characterization of Daunorubicin Degradation Products (1987) Int. J. Pharm., vol. 34, pp.. 247.
Bachur, Daunomycin Metabolism in Rat Tissue Slices., J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 175(2):331.
Riley, et al., Review of New Drugs--1980, U.S. Pharm. 33 (Feb.1981).
Boiron et al., Daunorubicin in the Treatment of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia. The Lancet. (Feb. 1969), p. 330.
Di Marco et al., Activity of Adriamycin (NSC 123127) and Daunomycin (NSC 82151) Against Mouse Mammary Carcinoma, Cancer Chemother. Rep., part 1, vol. 56(2):153 (1972).
Barthelemy-Clavey et al., Self-Association of Daunorubicin, FEBS Lett., vol. 46(1), pp. 5 (1974).
Calendi et al., On Physico-Chemical Interactions between Daunomycin and Nucleic Acids, Biochem Biophys. Acta., vol. 103:25. (1965).
Schreier, Binding of Daunomycin to Acidic Phospholipids J. Par. Sci. Tech, vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 213 (1989).
Rhone-Paulene S.A, Improvements in or relating to Antibiotics and their Preparation, U.K. Patent 985,598 (Mar. 10, 1965).
Dubost et al., Un nouvel antibiotique a proprieties cytostatiques: la rubidomycine (1963) C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 257, pp. 813.
Maral et al., Etude Toxicologique et activite Antitumorale Experimentale de la Rubidomycine (13.057 R.P.) Path. Biol., vol. 15, No. 19-20, pp.. 903-908 (1967).
Depois et al: Un nouvel antibiotique dove d'activite antitumorale la rubidomycine (13.057 R.P.), J. Preparation et properties, Arzricial Forsch. 17:934 (1967).
Brazhnikova et al., Physicochemical Properties of Antitumour Antibiotic Rubomycin produced by Act. Cocruleorubidus (1986) Antibiotki 11:763.
"Discovery & Development of Doxorubicin", Doxorubicin, Anticancer Antibiotics (Arcamone, eds.) (1981) Academic Press, pp. 1-47.
Blum et al., Adriamycin: A New Anticancer Drug with Significant Clinical Activity, Annals of Int. Med., 80:249-259 (1974).
Arcamone et al., Adriamycin (14-Hydroxydaunomycin), a Novel Antitumor Antibiotic Tetrahedron Letters No. 13, p. 1007-1010.
Di Marco et al., Adriamycin, a New Antibiotic, Antitumour, Activity, Cancer Chem. Reports, part 1, vol. 53, No. 1, p. 33 (1969).
Trissel: A Handbook on Injectable Drugs 2.sup.nd edition (1980), p. 196.
Trissel: A Handbook on Injectable Drugs 4.sup.th edition (1986), p. 215-217.
Trissel: A Handbook on Injectable Drugs 5.sup.th edition (1988), p. 259-264.
McEvoy, AHFS Drug Information 1984, p. 251-254.
AHFS Drug Information 1990, p. 504-507.
Fischer, The Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook 3.sup.rd edition (1989), p. 82-87.
Drug Information for the Health Care Professional USP DI (1991) 11.sup.th Edition, p. 1217-1222.
Benvenuto et al., Stability & Compatibility of Antitumor Agents in Glass & Plastic Containers, (Dec. 1981), Am. J. Hosp. Pharm., vol. 38, pp. 1914.
Walker et al., Doxorubicin Stability in Syringes and Glass Vials and Evaluation of Chemical Contamination, Can J. Hosp. Pharm. 44(2): 71(1991).
Gupta et al., Investigation of the Stability of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride using Factorial Design, Drug Development & Industrial Pharmacy, (1988) vol. 14(12) p. 1657-1671.
Beijnen et al., Stability of intravenous admixtures of doxorubicin and vincristine. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm., vol. 43, pp. 3022, (Dec. 1986).
Asker et al., Effect of Glutathione on Photolytic Degradation of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, J. Par. Sci. Tech. (1988), 42(5)193.
Habib et al., Photostabilization of doxorubicin Hydrochloride with Radioprotective and Photoprotective Agents: Potential Mechanism for Enhancing Chemotherapy during Radiotherapy (Nov.-Dec. 1989) 43 J. Parenteral Science & Technology, vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 254, (Nov.-Dec.,. 1989).
Speth, et al., Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Doxorubicin, Clin. Pharm., vol. 15, pp. 15-31, (1988).
Yee et al., Adriamycin: A Brief Review (Apr., 1981) Am. J. Int. Ther. Clin Nut. pp. 7-12.
Hoffman et al., Stability of Refrigerated and Frozen Solutions of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride (Nov. 1979), Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. vol. 36(11) 1536-1538.
Karlsen et al., Stability of cytotoxic intravenous solutions subjected to freeze-thaw treatment (1983), Chemical Abstracts, vol. 99, No. 146022, pp. 374.
Gaj., et al., Compatibility of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride and Vinblastine Sulfate--The Stability of a Solution Stored in Cormed .RTM.Reservoir Bags or Monoject.RTM. Plastic Syringes (May, 1984) Am. J. IV Ther. Clin. Nut., pp.8.
Tavoloni et al., Photolytic Degradation of Adriamycin (1980) Comm. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. vol., 32, pp. 860.
Garnick et al., Phase 1 Trial of Long Term Continuous Adriamycin Administration, Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., C-106: p. 359,(Mar. 1981).
Lokich et al., Constant Infusion Schedule for Adriamycin: A Phase I-II Clinical Trial of a 30-Day Schedule by Ambulatory Pump Delivery System, J. Clin. Oncol., vol. 1 (1): 24 (1983).
Vogelzang et al., Continuous Doxorubicin Infusion (CDI) Using an Implanted Lithium Battery-Powered Drug Administration Device System, Proc. Am.Soc. Clin.Uncol. C-1030: p. 263, (Mar. 1984).
Legha et al., Reduction of Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity by Prolonged Continuous Intravenous Infusion, Ann. Int. Med., vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 133 (1982).
Pavlik et al., Stability of Doxorubicin in Relation to Chemosensitivity Determinations: Loss of Lethality and Retention of Antiproliferative Activity (1984), Cancer Investigation 2 (6), 449-458.
Dozier et al., Practical Considerations in the Preparation and Administration of Cancer Chemotherapy (Sep. 1983) Am.J. Int. Ther. Clin. Nut., pp. 6.
Kirschenbaum et al: Stability of injectable medications after reconstitution, Am. J. Hosp. Pharm.: 33:767-790 (Aug., 1976).
Janssen et al., Doxorubicin decomposition on storage. Effect of pH., type of buffer and liposome encapsulation, (1985) Chemical Abstracts, vol. 102, No. 209226k.
Crommelin et al., Preparation and characterization of doxorubicin-containing liposomes. II. Loading capacity, long-term stability and of doxorubicin-bilayer interaction mechanism (1983) Int. J. Pharm. vol. 17, pp. 135.
Van Bommel, et al., Stability of Doxorubicin-Liposomes on Storage: as an Aqueous Dispersion, Frozen or Freeze dried (1984), Int. J. Pharm., vol. 22, pp. 299-310.
Crommelin et al., Preparation and characterization of doxorubicin-containing lipsomes: I. Influence of liposome charge and pH of hydration medium on loading capacity and particle size, (1983), Int. J. Pharm., vol. 16, pp. 93-96.
Gupta et al., "Influence of Stabilization Temperature on the Entrapment of Adriamycin", Albumin Microspheres Drug. Dev. Int. Pharm., vol. 13, No. 8, pp. 1471-1482, (1987).
Yanagawa et al., Stability and Releasibility of Adriamycin Ointment (1983).
Vilallonga et al: Interaction of Doxorubicin with Phospholipid Monolayers, J. Pharm. Sci. 67(6), pp. 773 (1978).
Duarte-Karim et al., Affinity of adriamycin to phospholipids. A possible explanation for cardiac mirochonorial lesions., (1976) Biochem Biophy. Research Comm., 71(2), pp. 658.
Bonadonna et al., Clinical Evaluation of Adriamycin a New Antitumor Antibiotic, Br. Med. J., (3), 503 (Aug. 1969).
Banks et al., Topical Installation of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Recurring Superficial Transitional Cell Carinoma of the Bladder, J. Ulrol., vol. 118, pp. 757 (1977).
Bertazzoli et al., Chronic toxicity of adriamycin: a new antineoplastic antibiotic (1972), Tox. Applied Pharm., vol. 2, pp. 287-301.
Wang et al., Therapeutic effect and toxicity of adriamycin in patients with neoplastic disease, (1971) Cancer, 28, pp.837.
Horn et al., Intravesical chemotherapy in a controlled trial with thio-tepa versus doxorubicin hydrochloride (1981) J. Urol., 125:652.
Jacobi et al., Studies on the intravesical action of topically administered G3H-doxorubicin hydrochloride in men: plasma uptake and tumor penetration (1980), J. Urol. 124:34.
Jaenke, R.S.: Delayed and progressive myocardial lesions after adriamycin administration in the rabbit. (1976) Cancer Res. vol. 36, pp. 2958-2966.
Casazza et al., Tumors and dental ocular abnormalities after treatment of infant rats with adriamycin, (1977) Tumor 63:331.
Barranco et al., Survival and cell kinetics effects of adriamycin on mammalian cells, (1973). Cancer Res. 33:11.
Gaj et al., Evaluation of growth in Five Microorganisms in Doxorubicin and Floxuridine Media, (1984) Pharm. Manuf., pp. 50.
Sturgeon and Schulman: Electronic Absorption Spectra and Protolytic Equlibria of Doxorubicin: Direct Spectrophotometric Determination of Microconstants, J. Pharm. Sci. 66(7):958, (1977).
Dalmark et al., A Fickian Diffusion Transport Process with Features of Transport Catalysis, J. Gen Physiol. 78:349 (1981).
Masuike et al., Determination of Adriamycin and its Metabolities in Biological samples using high performance liquid chromatography Chemical Abstracts (1984), vol. 101, pp. 5.
Barth et al., "Determination of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride.", Pharamceutical Preparations using High Pressure Liquid Chromatography, (1977) J. of Chromatography vol. 131, p. 375-381.
Arena et al., Analysis of the pharmacokinetic characteristics, pharmacological and chemotherapeutic activity of 14-hydroxy-daunomycin (adriamycin), a new drug endowed with an Antitumor activity, (1971) Drug Res. 21: 1258.
Watson et al., Rapid analytic method for adriamycin and metabolites in human plasma by a thin fim flourescence scanner (1976) Cancer Treat. Rep., vol. 60, No. 11, pp. 1611.
Langone et al., Adriamycin and Metabolites: Separation by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography and Qunitation by Radioimmunoassay, Biochem Med. 12:283 (1975).
Benjamin et al., Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of adriamycin in man, Clin. Pharm. Ther., 14(4) Part 1, 592.
Epirubicin, Drugs of the Future, vol. 8,(5): pp. 402, (1985).
Cersosimo et al., Epirubicin: A Review of the Pharmacology, Clinical Activity , and Adverse Effects of an Adriamycin Analogue, J. Clin. Oncol 4(3), 425 (1986).
Fischer, "The Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook", 3.sup.rd Edition, (1989), p. 87-89.
DeVroe. et al., A Study on the stability of three antineoplastic drugs and on their sorption by i.v. delivery systems and end-line filters, (1990), Int. J. Pharm. vol. 65, p. 49-56.
DeVries, et. al., A Phase 1 and Pharmocokinetic Study with 21 day Continuous infusion of Epirubicin., J. Clin. Oncol., (1987), 5(9), 1445-1451.
Adams, et. al, Pharmaceutical Apsects of Home Infusion Therapy for Cancer Patients, (Apr. 1987), Pharm J., pp. 476.
Weenen, et. al., "Pharmacokinetics of 4-Epi-doxorubicin in Man", Invesi. New Drugs, vol. 1, (1983), pp. 59.
Arcamone, et. al., "Synthesis and Antitumour Activity of 4-Demethoxydaunorubicin, 4-Demothoxy-7, 9-diepidaunorubicin, and their beta anomers", Cancer Treat Rep. 60(7):829 (1976).
Turowski et al., "Visual Compatability of Idarubicin Hydrochloride with selected drugs during simulated Y-site injection", (Oct. 1991), Ans. J. Hosp. Pharm., vol. 48, pp. 2181.
Hurteloup et al., Phase II Trial of Idarubicin (4- Demethoxydaunorubicin) in Advanced Breast Cancer, Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 25(3)423 (1989).
Kaplan et al., Phase I Trial of 4- Demethoxydaunorubicin with single i.v. doses, Eur. J. Clin. Cancer Oncol., 18(12) 1303 (1982).
Reich et al., "Carminomycin", Arptheacyclines: Current Status and New Developments, (1980) (J. Cooke et al., eds.) Academic Press, pp. 295.
Brazhnikova et al., "Physical and Chemical Characteristics and Structure of Carminomycin, a New Antitumour Antibiotic", J. Antibiot, 27(4):254 (1974).
Brazhnikova et al., "Carminomycin, a New Antitumour Anthracycline" (1973) Antibiotiki 18:681.
Crooke, "A Review of Carminomycin, A New Anthracycline Developed in the USSR" J. Med. 8(5): 295 (1977).
Lankelma et al, "Plasma Concentrations of Carminomycin and Carminomycinol in Man, Measured in High Pressure Liquid Chromatography", Eur. J. Cancer clin. Oncol. 18(4):363 (1982).
Fandrich, "Analysis of Carminomycin in Human Serum by Fluorometric High-Performance Liquid Chromatography", J. Chromatogr. 223 155 (1981).
Oki, "Aclacinomycin A Anthracyclines: Current Status and New Developments", (1980) Academic Press., pp. 323.
Oki et al., "Antitumour Anthracycline Antibiotics, Aclacinomycin A and Analogues: I. Taxonomy, Production, Isolation and Physicochemical Properties", J. Antibiot 32(8):791 (1979).
Oki, "New Antitumour Antibiotics, Aclacinomycins A and B", J. Antibiot, 28(10):830 (1975).
Mori et al., "Physicochemical Properties and Stability of Aclacinomycin A Hydrochloride," (1980), Jpn. J. Antibiot 33:618.
Trissel, "Handbook on Injectable Drugs", 5.sup.th Edition, p. 707.
Fischer, "The Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook", 3.sup.rd Edition, pp. 17-19.
Arcamone et al., "Synthesis and Antitumour Activity of 4-Deoxydaunorubicin and 4-Deoxyadriamycin", J. Med. Chem. 19(12):1424 (1976).
Fischer, "The Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook" 3.sup.rd Edition (1989), pp. 88.
Salmon et al., "Antitumour Activity of Esorubicin in Human Tumour Clonogenic Assay with Comparison to Doxorubicin", J. Clin. Oncol. 2(4):282 (1984).
Kovach et al., "Phase I Trial & Assay of Rubidozone (NSC 164011) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors", (Mar. 1979) Cancer Research vol. 39, pp. 823.
Deprez-de Campanere et al., "Pharmacokinetic, Toxicologic, and Chemotherapeutic Properties of Detorubicin in Mice: A Comparative Study with Daunourubicin and Adriamycin", Cancer Treat. Rep., 63(5):861 (1979).
Bono, "The Preclincial Development of Quelamycin and its Initial Clinical Trials.", Aruthracyclines: Current Status and New Developments, (1980) Academic Press, pp. 315.
Gosalvez et al., "Quelamycin, a New Derivative of Adriamycin with Several Possible Therapeutic Advantages", Eur. J. Cancer 14:1185 (1978).
Reich et al., "Marcellomycin" Anthracyclines: Current Status and New Developments, (1980) Academic Press, p. 343.
Nettleston et al., New Antitumour Antibiotics: Musettamycin and Marcellomycin from Bohemic Acid Complex: (1977) 30(6) J. Antibiotics 525.
Israel et al., "Adriamycin Analogues: Preparation and Biological Evaulation of Some N-Perfluoroacyl Analogues of Daunorubicin, Adriamycin, and N-(trifluoroacetyl) adriamycin 14-valerate and their 9, 10-Anhydro Derivatives" J. Med. Chem. 25:187 (1982).
Tong et al., "5-Iminodaunorubicin: Reduced Cardiotoxic Properties in an Antitumour Anthracycline", J. Med. Chem. 22(1): 36 (1979).
Arcamone et al., "Synthesis and Antitumour Activity of new Daunorubicin and Adriamycin Analogues" (1978) Experientia 34:1255.
Umezawa et al., "Tetrahydropyranyl Derivatives of Daunomycin and Adriamycin", J. Antibiot 32(10):1082 (1979).
Chen et al., "Possible Strategies for the Formulation of Antineoplastic Drugs" (1986) Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. vol. 12(7) 1041.
Pharmaceutics--The Science of dosage form design (Aulton) (1988), pp. 242-244, 252-253, 368-369, 374-375, 380-.
Experimental Pharmaceutical Technology, 2.sup.nd Ed.(Parrott & Saski), 1965, pp. 132-134, 149-154.
Pharmaceutics & Pharmacy Practice (1982) (Banker & Chalmers), pp. 238-243, 275-278.
Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Parenteral Medications: vol. 1 (Avis et al. 1984) "Biopharmaceutics of Injectable Medication" (Motola).
Connors et al., "Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals--a Handbook for Pharmacists" (1979) Wiley, pp. 3-7, 44-63, 74-75.
Ozturk et al., "Dissolution of Ionizable Drugs in Buffered and Unbuffered Solutions" (1988) 5(5) Pharm. Res. 272.
Gordon et al., "The Art and Science of Contemporary Drug Development", Prog. Drug. Res. 16:194 (1972).
Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Parenteral Medications: vol. 1 (Avis et al., 1984), "Preformulation Research of Parenteral Medications" (Motola & Agharkar).
The Theory & Practice of Industrial Pharmacy (Lachman et al.), 3.sup.rd Ed. 1986, p. 191, et seq., pp. 191-194, 195-196, 459-460, 471-472, 477-478, 764-765.
Lin, "Kinetic Study in Formulation Investigation of New Compounds" (1968).
Zoglio, "Preformulation Stability Testing of Parenteral Products" (1968).
Knoop, "The Pharmaceutical Drug Development Process: An Overview" (1988) 22 Drug. Inf. J. 259.
Rees, "Physico-Mechanical Pre-Formulation Studies" (1973) 112 Boll. Chim. Farm. 216.
Monkhouse, "Dosage Forms For Clinical Trials" (1985) 11 (9 & 10) Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1729.
Graffner et al., "Preformulation Studies in a Drug Development Program for Tablet Formulations", J. Pharm. Sci. 74(1) 16 (1985).
Davignon et al., Pharmaceutical Aspects of Antitumour Agents (1984) Pharm. Weekbt. 119:1144.
Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Parenteral Medications: vol. 2 (Avis et al., 1984) "Formulation for Large Volume Parenterals" (Demorest), pp. 55-63, 68-70, 73-76, 83.
Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Parenteral Medications: vol. 1(Avis et al., 1984) "Formulation for Small Volume Parenterals" (DeLuca & Boylan).
Schumacher (ed), Bulk Compounding Technology.
Carlin, "Incompatibilities of Parenteral Medications" (Jun. 1968) 25 Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 271.
Kalmas, et al., "Solubility Aspects in Parenteral Formulation" (May/Jun. 1982) Ind. J. Hosp. Pharm. 94, pp. 94-96, 98, Table I.
Parrott, Formulation of Parenterals.
Lin, "Parenteral Formulations I. Comparisons of Accelerated Stability Data with Shelf-Life Studies", Bull. Par. Drug Assoc. 23(6):269.
Lin, "Parenteral Formulations II. A Stability Testing Program for Parenteral Products", Bull. Par. Drug. Assoc. 24(2):83.
Lin, "Photochemical Considerations of Parenteral Products", Bull. Par. Drug. Assoc. 23 (4):149.
National Coordinating Committee on Large Volume Parenterals, "Recommendations to Pharmacists for Solving Problems with Large-Volume Parenterals", Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 33:231 (1976).
Zellmer, "Solving Problems with Large-Volume Parenterals, 1: Pharmacist Responsibility for Compounding Intravenous Admixtures", Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 32:255 (1975).
Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, "Parenteral Medications: vol. 1 (Avis et al. 1984)--Parenteral Drug Administration: Routes, Precautions, Problems & Complications" (Duma & Akers).
Edward, "pH: An important Factor in the Compatibility of Additives In Intravenous Therapy" (Aug. 1967) vol. 24 Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 440.
Document entitled "Kinetic pH Profiles", pp. 59-121, 380-385.
Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18.sup.th ed. 1990; ch. 17: Ionic Solutions & Electrolytic Equilibria.
Advances in Pharmaceutical Services, vol. 2 (Bean et al., 1967), pp. 62-75, 80-95.
Fynn, "Buffers-pH Control within Pharmaceutical Systems" (Mar.-Apr. 1980) vol. 34 (2) J. Parenteral Drug Assoc. 139.
Windheuser, "The Effect of Buffers on Parenteral Solutions" (Sep./Oct. 1963) vol. 17(5) Bull Parenteral Drug Assoc.
Rubino, "The Effects of Cosolvents on the Action of Pharmaceutical Buffers" (1987) 41(2) J. Paren. Sci. Tech. 45.
Kramer & Flynn, "Solubility of Organic Hydrochlorides" (Dec. 1972) vol. 61 (12) J. Pharm. Sci. 1896.
Tencheva et al., "New Approach of the Extrapolation Procedure in the Determination of Acid-Base Constants of Poorly Soluble Pharmaceuticals" (1979); Arzneim Forsch/Drug Res. 29 (II) #9.
Bogardus et al., "Solubility of Doxycycline in Aqueous Solutions" (Feb. 1979) vol. 68 (2) J. Pharm. Sci. 188.
Miyazaki et al., "Precaution of Use of Hydrochloride Salts in Pharmaceutical Formulation" (Jun. 1981) 70(6) J. Pharm. Sci. 594.
Greene et al.: Stability of cicplatin in aqueous solution, Am J. Hosp. Pharm. 36:38 (1979).
Stjernstrom et al: Studies on the stability and compatibility of drugs in infusion fluids, Acta Pharm Spec. 15:33 (1978).
Ho: Prediction of Pharmaceutical Stability of Parenteral Solutions III (Feb. 1971) vol. 5, Drug, Int. Clin. Pharm. 47.
Stella: Chemical and Physical Bases Determining the Instability and Incompatibility of Formulated Injectable Drugs (1986) 40(4) J. Paren. Sci. Tech. 142.
Newton: "Physicochemical Determinants of Incompatibility and Instability in Injectable Drug Solutions and Admixtures" (1978 35 M. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1213.
Mendenhall: Stability of Parenterals (1984) Drugs Dev. Ind. Pharm. 10(8-9) 1297.
Singh et al.: Effect of Solvents and Additives on the Stability of Drugs, Pharma Times 13.
Pope: Accelerated Stability Testing for Prediction of Drug Product Stability--First of a Two-Part Article (Nov., 1980) D & CI 54, pp. 54, 56, 59, 60, 62, 116.
Pope: Accelerated Stability Testing for Prediction of Drug Product Stability--Second of a Two-Part Article (Dec., 1980) D & CI 48, pp. 48, 50, 55, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64-66, 110, 112-116.
Amirjahed: Simplified Method to Study Stability of Pharmaceutical Preparations, J. Pharm Sci. pp(6):785 (1977).
Vogenberg et al.: Stability Guidelines for Routinely Refrigerated Drug Products, Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 40:101 (1983).
Newton et al.: Estimating shelf-life of drugs in solution. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 44:1633 (1987).
Mollica et al.: Stability of Pharmaceuticals. J. Pharm. Sci. 67(4):443 (1978).
King et al: Statistical Prediction of Drug Stability Based on Non-Linear Parameter Extension, J. Pharm. Sci. 73(5):657.
Herrick et al.; Monetary incentive for pharmacists to control drug costs; (Jul. 1985) vol. 42, Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1527.
Waller: Documenting i.v. admixture product waste (Aug. 1980) vol. 43, Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1914.
Williams et al.: The Lyophilization of Pharmaceuticals: A Literature Review (1984) 38(2) J.. Paren. Sci. Tech. 48.
Flamberg et al.: Manufacturing Considerations in the Lyophilization of Parenteral Products (1986) Pharm. Manuf.3:29-31.
Maral et al.: Un Nouvel Antibiotique Doue D'Activite Antitumorale: La Rubidomycine (13 057 R.P.), II: Activite antitumorale experimentale Arzncimittel Forsch (1967) 17:939.
Beijnen et al.: Aspects of the Degradation Kinetics of Doxorubicin in Aqueous Solution (1986) 32 Int. J. Pharm. 123.
Gjelstrup et al., Almen Farmaci II (1983).
Handbook on Injectible Drugs 3.sup.rd Ed. (Trissel), 1983.
Wang et al., "Review of Excipients and pH's for Parenteral Products Used in the United States", Journal of the Parenteral Drug Association 14(6):452 (1980).
Jonkman-de Vries et al., "Pharmaceutical Development of a Parental Lyophilized Formulation of the Novel Indoloquinone Antitumor Agent EO", Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 34:416-422 (1994).
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mack Publishing, (1980), p. 1365-1366.
The Pharmaceutical Codex 11.sup.th Ed., 1979, p. 446-447.
The Pharmaceutical Codex 12.sup.th Ed. (Lund), 1994, p. 201.
Kjeld Ilver: Almen Galenisk Farmaci--Forel.gtoreq.sningsnoter, Dansk Farmaceutforenings Forlag 1971.
Sv. Aage Schou & V. Gaun.Arrow-up bold. Jensen: Tr.gtoreq.k af den glaeniske farmaci, Store Nordiske Videnskabsboghandel, 1959.
Almen Farmaci, Dansk Farmaceutforenings Forlag 1980.
Erik Sandell: Galenisk Farmaci, 2.sup.nd edition, Stockholm 1967.
Erik Sandell: Galenisk Farmaci, 3.sup.rd edition, Stockholm 1982.
User information for ADRIBLASTIN.RTM., Apr. 1983.
Alfred N. Martin et al., Physikalische Pharmazie 1975, p. 239.
European Pharmacopeia, vol. III, 1979, p. 656: Citations--D 14.
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 471005 Jan 1990
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 368402 Jan 1995
Parent 224993 Apr 1994
Parent 827938 Jan 1992
Parent 341249 Apr 1989
Parent 064653 Jun 1987
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 878784 Jun 1986