The invention relates generally to injection-compression molded rotors. More particularly, the invention relates to injection-compression molded rotors for rotary shear valve assemblies for liquid chromatography applications.
Many analytic systems incorporate valves for controlling fluid flow. An example is the use of shear valves in some chromatography systems. These valves often must retain fluid integrity, that is, such valves should not leak fluids. As a valve is cycled, however, between positions, the loads placed on the moving parts cause wear.
Some valves are subjected to high pressures. For example, sample injector valves in high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) apparatus, are exposed to pressures approximately 1,000 to 5,000 pounds per square inch (psi), as produced by common solvent pumps. Higher pressure chromatography apparatus, such as ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) apparatus, have solvent pumps that operate at pressures up to 15,000 psi or greater. As the pressure of a system increases, wear and distortion of a valves components, such as a rotor and a stator, tends to increase, and the valve's expected lifetime may be reduced.
This invention arises, in part, from the realization that rotors for shear valve assemblies can advantageously be formed via injection-compression molding. Such configurations can provide for rotors which have a more uniform structure, are less susceptible to wear, and/or are less prone to contribute to carryover than conventional rotors. The use of injection-compression molding can also help to reduce internal stresses in the rotors, and can be a less expensive alternative to method of forming conventional rotors.
In one aspect, the invention provides a shear valve assembly for use in a high performance liquid chromatography system. The shear valve assembly includes a stator having a plurality of first fluid-conveying features; and a rotor having one or more second fluid-conveying features. The rotor is movable, relative to the stator, between a plurality of discrete positions such that, in each of the discrete positions, at least one of the one or more second fluid-conveying features overlaps with multiple ones of the first fluid conveying features to provide for fluid communication therebetween. The rotor, including the second fluid-conveying features, is formed by injection-compression molding.
Another aspect features a method that includes injecting molten resin into a tool cavity, and compressing the resin within the tool cavity to form a rotor for a shear valve assembly. The rotor is formed with one or more fluid-conveying features for fluid communication with a stator.
A further aspect provides a rotor for a rotary shear valve assembly. The rotor has:
a substantially planar surface with one or more fluid-conveying features for fluid communication with a stator. The fluid-conveying features are formed via an injection-compression molding process.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the rotor is formed of a polymer filled with 20% to 50% carbon fiber (30% carbon fiber) by weight.
In certain implementations, the polymer is polyether-ether-ketone.
In some implementations, the one or more second fluid-conveying features include one or more arcuate grooves.
In certain implementations, the one or more arcuate grooves have a width of approximately 0.005 inches to 0.020 inches (e.g., approximately 0.008 inches).
In some implementations, the one or more arcuate grooves have a depth of 0.005 inches to 0.020 inches (e.g., 0.008 inches).
In certain implementations, a seal formed between contacting surfaces of the rotor and the stator substantially prevents fluidic leakage up to at least 15,000 psi (e.g., between 15,000 psi and 19,000 psi).
In some implementations, injecting molten resin into a tool cavity includes injecting molten resin into a tool cavity between a stationary die and a movable die.
In certain implementations, compressing the resin includes displacing the movable die toward the stationary die to compress the resin within the tool cavity and thereby forming the rotor having the one or more fluid-conveying features.
In some implementations, the stationary die or the movable die includes tooling features for forming the one or more fluid-conveying features in the rotor.
In certain implementations, the movable die includes first tooling features for forming the one or more fluid-conveying features in the in the rotor, and the stationary die includes second tooling features for forming holes in the rotor for mounting the rotor to a drive shaft.
In some implementations, the one or more fluid-conveying features includes one or more arcuate grooves, and the stationary die or the movable die includes tooling features for forming the one or more arcuate grooves.
In certain implementations, the one or more arcuate grooves have one or more dimensions that are 0.010 inches or less in size.
In some implementations, the stationary die includes overflow ports and excess resin is forced out of the tool cavity through the overflow ports as the resin is compressed for promoting a uniform flow of the resin within the cavity.
In certain implementations, the overflow ports are equally spaced apart in a radial array for promoting a symmetrical flow of the resin.
In some implementations, the resin includes polyether-ether-ketone.
In certain implementations the resin comprises 20% to 50% carbon fiber (e.g., 30% carbon fiber) by weight.
In some implementations, the carbon fibers have a diameter of 6 microns to 8 microns (e.g., 7 microns).
In certain implementations, the carbon fibers have a length of 0.002 inches to 0.020 inches.
In some implementations, the one or more fluid-conveying features comprise one or more arcuate grooves.
In certain implementations, the one or more fluid-conveying features have a width and a depth of less than 0.020 inches (e.g., less than 0.010 inches).
In some implementations, the one or more fluid-conveying features have a width of approximately 0.005 inches to 0.020 inches (e.g., approximately 0.008 inches).
In certain implementations, the one or more fluid-conveying features have a depth of 0.005 inches to 0.020 inches (e.g., 0.008 inches).
In some implementations, the one or more fluid conveying features have one or more dimensions that are 0.010 inches or less in size.
Implementations can provide one or more of the following advantages.
In some implementations, carryover can be reduced. For example, by molding rotor grooves rather than machining, carbon fiber is fully encapsulated by resin which has a direct impact on lowering carryover. Machining shears and exposes the carbon fibers which contribute to carryover, which can adversely affect chromatographic results.
In certain implementations, injection-compression molding of rotors can provide for manufacturing cost savings. In this regard, it can be less expensive to mold features rather than to machine them, particularly when the features are below 0.010 inches in size. Injection molding alone generally cannot “pack out” such small features.
In some implementations, internal stresses which lead to warpage can be reduced. For example, injection molding by itself can cause internal stresses to a molded part due to non-symmetrical filling. Internal stresses can interfere with the ability to maintain a flat surface on the molded part during subsequent lapping and polishing processes. However, by adding a compression step, these internal stresses can be reduced.
In certain implementations, the additional of a compression step during fabrication of a valve rotor has the ability to further flatten out carbon fibers at the surface of the rotor. Carbon fiber laying flat as opposed to being “on end,” has a tendency to wear less and more uniformly leading to a longer operating life for the shear valve assembly. This flattening effect can also help to remove flow lines which indicate that the resin mix is less uniform.
Other aspects, features, and advantages are in the description, drawings, and claims.
Like reference numbers indicate like elements.
Rotary shear valve assemblies described herein have a rotor formed via an injection-compression molding process. The use of the injection-compression molding process allows fluid-conveying features (e.g., grooves) of the rotor to be formed by molding rather than by machining This can be beneficial particularly in instances in which the rotor is molded from a carbon fiber filled polymer where machining of the rotor (e.g., to form the fluid-conveying features) might otherwise shear and expose the carbon fibers, which, in turn, can contribute to carryover. The use of the injection-compression molding process can also provide a rotor that has a more uniform (homogeneous) structure (e.g., with uniformly distributed carbon fibers and substantially free of resin flow lines).
The rotor 24 is coupled to the head portion 28 of the rotor assembly 22. Extending orthogonally from the distal face of the head portion 28 are two pins 42-1, 42-2 that enter corresponding openings (
The drive shaft 26 extends through an opening at the base of the housing 14. The end of the drive shaft 26 extends into an opening 50 of the drive shaft clamp 16, which is appropriately shaped to closely receive a notched end (
The compression of the springs 30 translates to an axial force to the rotor 24, urging the rotor surface 44 against the stator surface 46 and maintaining a fluidic seal at the interface of these surfaces 44, 46. In one implementation, the springs 30 are clover springs. Other types of springs can be used, for example, Belleville washers, without departing from the principles described herein. In one implementation, the compressive load achieved by the springs 30 is approximately 600 lbs. and is designed to produce a seal between the rotor and stator that can prevent leakage at fluidic pressures at least as great as 20,000 psi. For example, in UPLC instruments, the fluidic pressure typically ranges between 15,000 psi and 20,000 psi. The springs 30 maintain the applied force applied throughout the rotation of the drive shaft 26 and the rotor 24.
The spacer 34 serves to separate the thrust bearing 36 and bearing washers 38 from the spring stack comprised of the springs 30 and spring washers 32. The thrust bearing 36 and bearing washers 38 facilitate rotation of the drive shaft. The shim 40 is used to achieve the desired amount of compression along the axis of the draft shaft, with additional shims being added to the drive shaft until the compressive load produced by the springs 30 reaches the desired target of, for example, approximately 600 lbs.
Referring to
The openings 71 can be approximately 0.006 inches diameter and can be arranged in a circular array of diameter 0.1 inches. The external diameter of the stator 12 can be about 1.5 inches. The stator 12 can be manufactured from stainless steel (e.g., 316 stainless steel), or other corrosion resistant alloy. The stator contact surface 46 can be coated with a wear resistant material, for example diamond-like carbon (DLC).
Also shown, the drive shaft 26 has a first portion 26-1 (adjacent the head portion 28) with a greater diameter than a second portion 26-2. At the end of the drive shaft 26 is a notch 80, sized to fit closely into the opening 50 (
In addition, the rotor 24 has two diametrically opposite openings 92-1, 92-2 (corresponding to the two pins of the drive shaft). The opening 92-1, referred to as a mating hole, is adapted to receive the smaller pin 42-2 of the rotor assembly 22 closely with tight tolerance. In one implementation, the mating hole 92-1 has a diameter of approximately 0.095 inches for closely receiving the 0.093 diameter implementation of the smaller pin 42-2. The opening 92-2 is an elliptically shaped slot adapted to receive the larger pin 42-1 of the two pins, with a greater measure of tolerance along the direction of the major axis of the slot than along the minor axis. In one implementation, the minor axis of the slot 92-2 is approximately 0.110 inches wide for receiving the 0.109 diameter implementation of the larger pin 42-1. The rotor 24 can slide onto the pins 42 of the head portion 28 without pressing. The ends of the pins 42 within the holes 92 of the rotor are approximately flush with the contact surface 44 of the rotor.
The rotor 24 can be manufactured from polyether-ether-ketone, such as PEEK™ polymer (available from Victrex PLC, Lancashire, United Kingdom), filled with 20% to 50% carbon fiber by weight, e.g., 30% carbon fiber by weight. The carbon fibers have a diameter of 6 microns to 8 microns, e.g., 7 microns, and a length of 0.002 inches to 0.020 inches. Notably, the rotor 24 is formed in an injection-compression molding process.
Conventional rotors are often manufactured by first injection molding a rotor puck (a pre-part), and then performing machining processes and polishing steps performed to complete the part.
In the injection-compression molding process, the movable die 212 is moved into a first position relative to the stationary die 210. As shown in
Then, the side gate 228 is closed and the volume of the cavity 226 is reduced, to compress the melted resin in the cavity, by moving the movable die 212 toward a second position relative to the stationary die 210, as illustrated in
This compression step causes flow lines, from the injection of the resin, to disperse and causes the carbon fibers to lay more flat (i.e., with the longitudinal axes of the fibers extending substantially parallel to the plane of the rotor contact surface 44) for better wear. The compression step also helps to resin to “pack out” better, i.e., as compared to conventional injection molding, to help fill intricate details such as the rotor grooves. This allows the rotor grooves 90 to be molded, and, molding the rotor grooves, rather than machining, helps to ensure that the carbon fiber remains fully encapsulated by the polymer which helps to reduce carryover. Machining, on the other hand, shears and exposes the carbon fibers which can contribute to carryover. Such machining is typically required as a subsequent processing step in the formation of conventional injection molded rotors. The compressed polymer is allowed to cool, and, then, the mold is opened by moving the movable die 212 away from the stationary die 210, and the molded part (the rotor 24, including grooves 90, center point 94, and openings 92-1, 92-2) is ejected, as illustrated in
While the invention has been shown and described with reference to specific implementations, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as recited in the accompanying claims.
This application claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/661,456 entitled “Injection-Compression Molded Rotors,” filed Jun. 19, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US13/43841 | 6/3/2013 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61661456 | Jun 2012 | US |