The present disclosure relates generally to exhaust treatment systems for controlling exhaust emissions. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to systems for reducing NOx emissions from engine exhaust.
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems are used to treat engine exhaust to provide a reduction in NOx emissions. Many SCR systems use ammonia as a reductant for reducing NOx to N2. A typical SCR system includes a substrate having a catalyst such as vanadium, titanium, platinum or other precious metal. In a typical NOx reduction reaction, the catalyst provided on the substrate promotes the reaction of ammonia with NOx to form N2 and H2O. This reaction is favored by the presence of excess oxygen.
In certain SCR systems, a urea-water solution is provided as a reductant source for use in the reduction of NOx. However, to function as an effective reductant, the urea-water solution must be decomposed into a useable reductant form (i.e., ammonia). To decompose the urea-water solution, the water in the solution is first removed through vaporization. Next, the urea decomposes via thermolysis to form isocyanic acid (HNCO) and ammonia (NH3). Finally, the HNCO decomposes via hydrolysis to form NH3 and carbon dioxide.
A problem with urea-based SCR systems is that urea and urea-by-product (e.g., cyanuric acid, biuret, melamine, ammelide, and ammeline) deposits can be formed within the exhaust system when decomposition of the injected urea-water solution is incomplete. This deposition of urea and urea-by-products is particularly problematic when the urea-water solution sprayed into the exhaust system is exposed to relatively low temperatures.
One aspect of the present disclosure relates to an exhaust treatment system for treating engine exhaust. The exhaust treatment system includes a reductant dispensing location at which a reductant is introduced into the exhaust being treated. In one embodiment, the reductant dispending location is configured to reduce the likelihood that the reductant or by-products from the reductant are deposited in significant amounts within the exhaust system.
A variety of additional aspects will be set forth in the description that follows. These aspects can relate to individual features and to combinations of features. It is to be understood that both the forgoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the broad concepts upon which the embodiments disclosed herein are based.
The present disclosure relates generally to exhaust treatment systems for controlling engine emissions (e.g., diesel engine emissions). In certain embodiments, exhaust treatment systems in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure include SCR systems used to control NOx emissions generated from engines such as on-road or off-road diesel engines. Certain embodiments of the present disclosure include reductant dispensers (e.g., injectors) that dispense (e.g., spray) reductants into an exhaust stream being treated by the exhaust treatment system. In preferred embodiments of the present disclosure, the exhaust treatment system is configured to reduce the likelihood for the reductant or by-products of the reductant to form deposits at locations within the exhaust system. In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the reductant dispensed into the exhaust treatment system includes urea (e.g., a urea-water solution). However, it will be appreciated that the various aspects of the disclosure can also be applied to exhaust treatment systems dispensing other types of reductants or other reactants.
Referring still to
Since the reductant from an injector mounted at the injector mounting location 32 is sprayed through the interior volume 30, portions of the reductant can become mixed/entrapped in the swirling exhaust and can remain in the interior volume 30 for extended periods of time thereby increasing the likelihood that portions of the reductant will become deposited within the stand-off tube 22. Furthermore, the stand-off tube 22 has an outer surface exposed to atmosphere which can cause cooling of the interior surface arrangement 23 of the stand-off tube 22 thereby exacerbating the deposition problem.
The exhaust pipe 124 includes a pipe wall 140 defining a side opening 142. The injector mounting structure 130 is secured to an exterior surface of the pipe wall 140 at a location in which the injector mounting structure 130 covers the side opening 142 of the pipe 124. For example, the injector mounting structure 130 includes a 143 base having a base surface 144 that contacts the exterior surface of the pipe wall 140 and that extends completely around a periphery of the side opening 142. The base surface 144 can have a curvature C1 (see
The injector mounting structure 130 includes an interior surface arrangement 148 defining an interior volume 150. When the injector mounting structure 130 is mounted to the exhaust pipe 124, the side opening 142 of the exhaust pipe 124 provides fluid communication between the interior of the exhaust pipe 124 and the interior volume 150 of the injector mounting structure 130. The interior volume 150 is preferably shaped to reduce or minimize the likelihood for exhaust to swirl or circulate within the interior volume 150 for an extended period of time. Thus, rather than swirling, the flow can generally make a single pass through the interior volume 150. This type of configuration assists in preventing reductant (e.g., a water-urea solution) sprayed from the injector 128 from depositing within the interior volume 150.
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment, the injector mounting structure 130 includes an upstream wall 170 that defines the upstream interior surface 164 and also defines an exterior injector mounting surface 172. The upstream wall 170 is depicted as being generally straight such that the upstream interior surface 164 and the exterior mounting surface 172 each have a generally planar configuration. The planar configuration of the exterior injector mounting surface 172 facilitates securing the injector 128 thereto. Referring to
The downstream interior surface 166 has a curvature C2 (shown at
The intermediate interior surface 168 provides an angular transition between the upstream interior surface 164 and the downstream interior surface 166. The intermediate interior surface 168 is depicted in
Referring to
Referring still to
The intermediate interior surface 168 defines a transition between the upstream interior surface 164 of the downstream interior surface 166. As shown at
Referring to
Referring again to
It is preferred for the nozzle of the injector 128 to be aimed such that the spray of reductant impinges upon the spray redirector 132 rather than the side of the exhaust pipe 124 that is located opposite from the injector 128. The spray redirector 132 is preferably made of a material that facilitates a high rate of heat transfer from the exhaust to the spray redirector. In this way, the spray director, which is located inside the exhaust pipe 124 and does not have significant surface area exposed to outside air, remains hot. Therefore, the spray from the injector 128 is directed at hot surfaces that do not encourage the deposition of the reductant. This is in contrast to the wall of the exhaust pipe 124 that has an outer surface exposed to cool air which can cause cooling of the wall 124. It is noted that in
In certain embodiments, it is desirable to reduce or minimize the interior volume defined within the injector mounting structure. In one example embodiment, the interior volume of the injector mounting structure is less than 3.5 cubic inches.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/617,301, filed Nov. 12, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,726,643, which application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 61/114,119, filed Nov. 13, 2008, which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3608532 | Balluff | Sep 1971 | A |
4454847 | Isomura et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
5082184 | Stettner et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5239969 | Beaty | Aug 1993 | A |
5968464 | Peter-Hoblyn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6074619 | Schoubye | Jun 2000 | A |
6312650 | Frederiksen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6401449 | Hofmann | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415602 | Patchett et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444177 | Müller et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449947 | Liu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6513323 | Weigl et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6996976 | Rumminger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7168241 | Rudelt et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20050013756 | Amou et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070163241 | Meingast et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080011777 | Cooke | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022663 | Dodge et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080134671 | Nefischer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090019843 | Levin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090158717 | Kimura et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100098604 | Drost et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107614 | Levin et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100170233 | Tangemann et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100212292 | Rusch et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110094206 | Liu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005061145 | Jun 2007 | DE |
20 2008 001 547 | Apr 2008 | DE |
10 2006 059 507 | Jun 2008 | DE |
2900440 | Nov 2007 | FR |
2 913 069 | Aug 2008 | FR |
WO 2008034941 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2009085641 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Figure 1 labeled Prior Art from current (U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,301) shows a prior art configuration for mounting an injector to an exhaust pipe, 1 page (Publicly known at least as early as Nov. 13, 2008). |
Hesser, M. et al., “SCR Technology for NOx Reduction: Series Experience and State of Development,” DEER Conference, pp. 1-29 (Aug. 21-25, 2005). |
Jean, E. et al., “SCR Integration for Exhaust Systems in Passenger Cars,” 6th International CTI-Forum—Exhaust Systems, pp. 1-40 (Jan. 30, 2008). |
SCR Catalytic Converter, http://rb-kwin.bosch.com/us/en/powerconsumptionemissions/exhaust-gastreatment/dieselengines/exhaust-gasmanagement/denoxtronic/scrcatalyticconverter.html, 1 page (Publicly known at least as early as Oct. 24, 2008). |
Belloir et al., English Abstract of FR 2,900,440 A1, Nov. 2, 2007. |
Haeberer et al., Machine Translation of DE 102005061145 A1, Jun. 28, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 28, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150047329 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61114119 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12617301 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 14281326 | US |