Ink delivery systems are utilized by various types of printers to generate text and/or images on a printing medium, such as paper, normally in response to communications and/or control signals from a computer. One known type of ink delivery system includes a printhead assembly that is configured to slide along a shaft in response to communications and/or control signals from a computer. As the printhead assembly slides along the shaft, ink is ejected through nozzles disposed in the printhead assembly onto the print medium to generate the text and/or images. The printhead assembly is said to be positioned “on-axis” because it is coupled to the shaft. While the printhead assembly may have one or more integral ink reservoirs (one per color), the primary bulk supply of ink is located in one or more ink supply containers (one per color) located somewhat remote from the shaft and printhead (though still within the printer), which is referred to as “off-axis” positioning. Typically, the printer includes a plurality of off-axis ink supply containers, each containing a different color or type of ink. The ink supply containers are connected to the printhead assembly by tubes, which provide fluid communication between the ink supply containers and the printhead assembly. Ink is supplied from the ink supply containers through the respective tubes to the printhead assembly at various times.
With such ink delivery systems, there is a desire to reduce or prevent air accumulation in various parts of the printhead assembly, because an over-accumulation of air in the printhead assembly can degrade the printing quality and/or reduce the usable life of the printhead assembly. There is a further desire to reduce or prevent water evaporation through the nozzles, for example, during long duration storage, because such may leave accretions in the nozzle bore made up of the non-volatile ink components. Another desire is to reduce or prevent obstructions, including kinks, in the tubes connecting the off-axis ink supply containers to the printhead assembly.
The embodiments described hereinafter were developed in light of these and other desires.
Systems and methods for improved ink delivery in an ink jet delivery system are disclosed. One exemplary system includes an on-axis printhead assembly having one or more ink reservoirs and a plurality of corresponding nozzles used to eject ink from the respective reservoirs onto a print medium, such as paper. The printhead includes a reservoir for each color printable by the printer. Each reservoir is fluidically connected to a group of corresponding nozzles through a fluid channel. A particle filter is disposed between each reservoir and the nozzles to filter unwanted particles as the ink flows from the reservoir to the nozzles. The system further includes one or more off-axis ink supply containers for storing quantities of ink. Each reservoir in the printhead assembly is typically fed by a corresponding off-axis ink supply container. The system includes a first flow path between each off-axis supply container and the corresponding reservoir of the printhead assembly (upstream of the filter). Further, the system includes a second flow path between each off-axis supply container and the fluid channel downstream of the filter. The first flow path facilitates the delivery of ink from the off-axis supply container to the corresponding reservoir and to evacuate air from the printhead assembly upstream of the filter. The second flow path is used to evacuate air from the printhead assembly downstream of the filter. Portions of the first and second flow paths may be shared. A bi-directional pump or the like is used to evacuate air through the first and second flow paths. Further, the pump and air/ink sensor are used with the second flow path and the first flow path to determine if accretions have formed in the tubes and to remove such accretions from the ink delivery system. Finally, the pump is used with the second flow path to aid in the removal of accretions.
Referring now to
Referring generally to
At various times, the reservoirs 42 are “recharged” with ink by drawing ink from the off-axis ink containers 12 into the corresponding reservoirs 42. The reservoirs 42 can be “recharged” based on various “triggering events”, such as between print jobs or when the ink level in the reservoir dips to a certain pre-defined level. Referring to
After all of the accumulator bags 36 are fully inflated, the direction of the pump 14 is reversed at step 430 so as to pump a known volume of air and ink from the off-axis ink containers 12 to the reservoirs 42. The actual volume of air/ink pumped into reservoir 42 may be monitored based upon the volume per pump cycle and the number of pump cycles of pump 14, as above. The air/ink sensor 24 is used to determine what proportion of the known air/ink volume pumped into the reservoirs 42 is ink and what proportion is air. The known volume of air/ink is predetermined so that any reservoirs 42 that were completely depleted of ink before the “recharge” method was employed are now full of ink and that reservoirs 42 that were not completely depleted before the “recharge” method was employed are “overfull” (the reservoirs 42 and accumulator bags 36 are sized to accommodate the “overfull” situation without spilling ink).
At step 440, the direction of pump 14 is again reversed to its original direction. Pump 14 now draws a known volume of air and ink from reservoirs 42. The ink is returned to the off-axis ink container 12 and the air is vented through the off-axis ink container vent chamber (not shown). After step 440, all air has been removed from the reservoirs 42. Further, an appropriate amount of fluid back pressure has been set in the printhead 18 to ensure optimal printing. Further the ink level in each reservoir has been set. At this point, inlet valve 32 is closed at step 450. Thereafter, the printing device is ready to print again.
While the above-described “recharge” algorithm effectively recharges the reservoir 42, removes air from the reservoir 42, and resets the fluid back pressure in the printhead assembly 18, it is not effective at removing accumulated air from the lower body 62 of printhead assembly 18 downstream of filter 40, including channels 44, 46, and 48, snorkel 50 and channel 54. As previously indicated, filter 40 is commonly sufficiently fine as to prevent air from passing through. Thus, air that has accumulated downstream of particle filter 40 (in the lower body 62) cannot be evacuated through reservoir 42. Therefore, a “purge” algorithm can be performed in the print system periodically to remove air that has accumulated in the lower body 62 downstream of the filter 40. The purge algorithm can be initiated based upon a variety of different triggering events, such as after a certain amount of ink has been ejected from the printhead nozzles, directly after a “recharge” cycle, after a certain elapsed time, or by the manual initiation of the user (e.g., pushing a button on the print system), for example.
The “purge” algorithm may also be used to aid in the recovery of plugged nozzles that result from long duration storage. By moving fresh ink into the lower body 62, including fluid flow paths 44, 46, 48, 50 and 54, the viscous fluid made up of non-volatile solvents that is present in the firing chamber is diluted with ink vehicle containing a sufficient concentration of water so as to enable the formation of a drive bubble that is capable of firing a drop which carries with it the accretion. As a result, any accretions that may have formed in the nozzles of the printhead assembly 18 will be removed
With reference to
At step 530, the recirculation valve 34 is closed and the inlet valve 32 is opened. At step 540, the pump 14 is activated in the opposite direction so as to pump the air and ink just removed from the lower body 62 back into reservoir 42. In this way, ink removed from the lower body 62 downstream of filter 40 is not wasted.
At step 545, the pump is again reversed and a known volume of air is then removed from reservoir 42 so as to reset the backpressure in reservoir 42.
At step 550, inlet valve 32 is closed. At this point, all air has been removed from the lower body 62, downstream of filter 40.
The above-described “recharge” algorithm includes steps for removing accumulated air from the reservoir 42 of the printhead assembly 18, and the above-described “purge” algorithm removes air from the lower body 62 of printhead assembly 18 downstream of filter 40. Together, the “recharge” and “purge” algorithms remove accumulated air from the printhead assembly 18, both upstream and downstream of the filter 40, without ejecting ink from the nozzles. Thus, there is little or no ink wasted when removing the air, and, accordingly, there is no little or no need for waste components to dispose of expelled ink. Moreover, the “purge” routine effectively removes accretions from the nozzles of the printhead assembly 18. Further, the “recharge” routine, in addition to removing accumulated air from the reservoir 42, delivers ink from the off axis ink supply, resets the backpressure in the printhead assembly, and sets the ink level in the printhead reservoirs to ensure optimal printing capability.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the foregoing preferred embodiment, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that the method and apparatus within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby. This description of the invention should be understood to include all novel and non-obvious combinations of elements described herein, and claims may be presented in this or a later application to any novel and non-obvious combination of these elements. The foregoing embodiment is illustrative, and no single feature or element is essential to all possible combinations that may be claimed in this or a later application. Where the claims recite “a” or “a first” element of the equivalent thereof, such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3739717 | Brown et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
4184169 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4303929 | Blanck | Dec 1981 | A |
4329696 | Denlinger et al. | May 1982 | A |
4333088 | Diggins | Jun 1982 | A |
4336037 | Goldis et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4340895 | Kikuchi | Jul 1982 | A |
4359744 | Salmre | Nov 1982 | A |
4364059 | Nagayama | Dec 1982 | A |
4368478 | Koto | Jan 1983 | A |
4376283 | Bower | Mar 1983 | A |
4380770 | Maruyama | Apr 1983 | A |
4399446 | McCann et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4403227 | Bertschy et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4403229 | Barteck | Sep 1983 | A |
4413267 | Hein | Nov 1983 | A |
4476472 | Aiba et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4494124 | Piatt et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4502054 | Brescia et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4502055 | Horike et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4527175 | Kojima et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4536776 | Knirsch et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4599624 | Aiba et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4619842 | Moss et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4658268 | Needham | Apr 1987 | A |
4680696 | Ebinuma et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4727378 | Le et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4811035 | Huliba et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4835554 | Hoisington et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837585 | Williams et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4862192 | Slomianny | Aug 1989 | A |
4870431 | Sousa et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4897762 | Daikoku et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4929963 | Balazar | May 1990 | A |
4937598 | Hine et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4940995 | Hine et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5121130 | Hempel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5189438 | Hine et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5291215 | Nozawa et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5331339 | Takahashi | Jul 1994 | A |
5341162 | Hermanson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5459497 | Manning et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466073 | Rossi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5532720 | Krueger et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5704403 | Schwenk et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5751300 | Cowger et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757405 | Bainvel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5818485 | Rezanka | Oct 1998 | A |
5831655 | Asawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5870126 | Kondo et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5936650 | Ouchida et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943078 | Nishimoto et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956062 | Omata et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6000792 | Koizumi | Dec 1999 | A |
6033061 | Niedermeyer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041709 | Wells et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6231174 | Haigo | May 2001 | B1 |
6241344 | Machida | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6331050 | Nakata et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6371607 | Wouters et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6428156 | Waller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478415 | Barinaga et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485137 | Karlinski et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491368 | Cipolla et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517189 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6652080 | Childs et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6742882 | Nakamura | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752493 | Dowell et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7033006 | Ebisawa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20010013882 | Niedermeyer et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020063763 | Mantell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030007047 | Otsuka et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030202057 | Childs et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202072 | Childs et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202073 | Dowell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040085416 | Kent | May 2004 | A1 |
20050007427 | Bellinger et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1359026 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1359027 | Nov 2003 | EP |
10329342 | Dec 1998 | JP |
200289222 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2003011380 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004202799 | Jul 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060164473 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |