Ink drop detector waste ink removal system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6491366
  • Patent Number
    6,491,366
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 20, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 10, 2002
    21 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Barlow; John
    • Do; An H.
    Agents
    • Miller; Christopher B.
Abstract
A waste ink removal system cleans ink residue from an ink drop sensor in a printing mechanism when a scraper, supported by a base, is actuated between a retracted position and an engaged position. The system also includes a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains onto which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position. A method of cleaning ink residue from an electrostatic sensing element of an ink drop detector, and a printing mechanism having such a waste ink removal system are also provided.
Description




INTRODUCTION




Printing mechanisms, such as inkjet printers or plotters, often include an inkjet printhead which is capable of forming an image on many different types of media. The inkjet printhead ejects droplets of colored ink through a plurality of orifices and onto a given media as the media is advanced through a printzone. The printzone is defined by the plane created by the printhead orifices and any scanning or reciprocating movement the printhead may have back-and-forth and perpendicular to the movement of the media. Conventional methods for expelling ink from the printhead orifices, or nozzles, include piezo-electric and thermal techniques which are well-known to those skilled in the art. For instance, two earlier thermal ink ejection mechanisms are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,278,584 and 4,683,481, both assigned to the present assignee, the Hewlett-Packard Company.




In a thermal inkjet system, a barrier layer containing ink channels and vaporization chambers is located between a nozzle orifice plate and a substrate layer. This substrate layer typically contains columnar arrays of heater elements, such as resistors, which are individually addressable and energized to heat ink within the vaporization chambers. Upon heating, an ink droplet is ejected from a nozzle associated with the energized resistor. The inkjet printhead nozzles are typically aligned in one or more columnar arrays substantially parallel to the motion of the print media as the media travels through the printzone. The length of the columnar nozzle arrays defines the maximum height, or “swath” height of an imaged bar that would be printed in a single pass of the printhead across the media if all of the nozzles were fired simultaneously and continuously as the printhead was moved through the printzone above the media.




Typically, the print media is advanced under the inkjet printhead and held stationary while the printhead passes along the width of the media, firing its nozzles as determined by a controller to form a desired image on an individual swath, or pass. The print media is usually advanced between passes of the reciprocating inkjet printhead in order to avoid uncertainty in the placement of the fired ink droplets. If the entire printable data for a given swath is printed in one pass of the printhead, and the media is advanced a distance equal to the maximum swath height in-between printhead passes, then the printing mechanism will achieve its maximum throughput.




Often, however, it is desirable to print only a portion of the data for a given swath, utilizing a fraction of the available nozzles and advancing the media a distance smaller than the maximum swath height so that the same or a different fraction of nozzles may fill in the gaps in the desired printed image which were intentionally left on the first pass. This process of separating the printable data into multiple passes utilizing subsets of the available nozzles is referred to by those skilled in the art as “shingling,” “masking,” or using “print masks.” While the use of print masks does lower the throughput of a printing system, it can provide offsetting benefits when image quality needs to be balanced against speed. For example, the use of print masks allows large solid color areas to be filled in gradually, on multiple passes, allowing the ink to dry in parts and avoiding the large-area soaking and resulting ripples, or “cockle,” in the print media that a single pass swath would cause.




A printing mechanism may have one or more inkjet printheads, corresponding to one or more colors, or “process colors” as they are referred to in the art. For example, a typical inkjet printing system may have a single printhead with only black ink; or the system may have four printheads, one each with black, cyan, magenta, and yellow inks; or the system may have three printheads, one each with cyan, magenta, and yellow inks. Of course, there are many more combinations and quantities of possible printheads in inkjet printing systems, including seven and eight ink/printhead systems.




Each process color ink is ejected onto the print media in such a way that the drop size, relative position of the ink drops, and color of a small, discreet number of process inks are integrated by the naturally occurring visual response of the human eye to produce the effect of a large colorspace with millions of discernable colors and the effect of a nearly continuous tone. In fact, when these imaging techniques are performed properly by those skilled in the art, near-photographic quality images can be obtained on a variety of print media using only three to eight colors of ink.




This high level of image quality depends on many factors, several of which include: consistent and small ink drop size, consistent ink drop trajectory from the printhead nozzle to the print media, and extremely reliable inkjet printhead nozzles which do not clog.




To this end, many inkjet printing mechanisms contain a service station for the maintenance of the inkjet printheads. These service stations may include scrapers, ink-solvent applicators, primers, and caps to help keep the nozzles from drying out during periods of inactivity. Additionally, inkjet printing mechanisms often contain service routines which are designed to fire ink out of each of the nozzles and into a waste spittoon in order to prevent nozzle clogging.




Despite these preventative measures, however, there are many factors at work within the typical inkjet printing mechanism which may clog the inkjet nozzles, and inkjet nozzle failures may occur. For example, paper dust may collect on the nozzles and eventually clog them. Ink residue from ink aerosol or partially clogged nozzles may be spread by service station printhead scrapers into open nozzles, causing them to be clogged. Accumulated precipitates from the ink inside of the printhead may also occlude the ink channels and the nozzles. Additionally, the heater elements in a thermal inkjet printhead may fail to energize, despite the lack of an associated clogged nozzle, thereby causing the nozzle to fail.




Clogged or failed printhead nozzles result in objectionable and easily noticeable print quality defects such as banding (visible bands of different hues or colors in what would otherwise be a uniformly colored area) or voids in the image. In fact, inkjet printing systems are so sensitive to clogged nozzles, that a single clogged nozzle out of hundreds of nozzles is often noticeable and objectionable in the printed output.




It is possible, however, for an inkjet printing system to compensate for a missing nozzle by removing it from the printing mask and replacing it with an unused nozzle or a used nozzle on a later, overlapping pass, provided the inkjet system has a way to tell when a particular nozzle is not functioning. In order to detect whether an inkjet printhead nozzle is firing, a printing mechanism may be equipped with a number of different ink drop detector systems.




One type of ink drop detector system utilizes a piezoelectric target surface that produces a measurable signal when ink droplets contact the target surface. Unfortunately, however, this type of technology is expensive and often is unable to detect the extremely small drops of ink used in inkjet printing systems with photographic image quality.




Another type of ink drop detector utilizes an optical sensor which forms a measurable signal when an ink droplet passes through a light beam from a sensory circuit. Unfortunately, this method is subject to extremely tight alignment tolerances which are difficult and expensive to setup and maintain. Additionally, an optical ink drop detection system is susceptible to the ink aerosol which results from the firing of the inkjet printhead inside of the printing mechanism. The aerosol coats the optical sensor over time, degrading the optical sensor signal and eventually preventing the optical sensor from functioning.




A more effective solution for ink drop detection is to use a low cost ink drop detection system, such as the one described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,190 assigned to the present assignee, Hewlett-Packard Company. This drop detection system utilizes an electrostatic sensing element which is imparted with an electrical stimulus when struck by a series of ink drop bursts ejected from an inkjet printhead. The electrostatic sensing element may be made sufficiently large so that printhead alignment is not critical, and the sensing element may function with amounts of ink or aerosol on the sensing element surface which would incapacitate other types of drop detection sensors.




In practical implementation, however, this electrostatic sensing element has some limitations. First, successive drops of ink, drying on top of one another quickly form stalagmites of dried ink which may grow toward the printhead. Since it is preferable to have the electrostatic sensing element very close to the printhead for more accurate readings, these stalagmites may eventually interfere with or permanently damage the printhead, adversely affecting print quality. Second, as the ink residue dries, it remains conductive and may short out the drop detector electronics as the ink residue grows and spreads. Thus, this dried residue may impair the ability of the sensor to measure the presence of drops properly.




Therefore, it is desirable to have a method and mechanism for effectively removing the waste ink residue from an electrostatic ink drop detector in an inkjet printing mechanism.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a fragmented perspective view of one form of an inkjet printing mechanism, here including a service station having an electrostatic ink drop detector and illustrating an embodiment of an electrostatic ink drop detector waste ink removal system.





FIG. 2

is an enlarged perspective view of the service station of

FIG. 1







FIG. 3

is an enlarged side elevational view of the service station of

FIG. 1

shown with an inkjet printhead firing ink onto the electrostatic ink drop detector.





FIG. 4

is an enlarged side elevational view of the service station of

FIG. 1

, showing the electrostatic ink drop detector being cleaned by an embodiment of a waste ink removal system.





FIGS. 5-7

are cross-sectional partial perspective views of separate embodiments illustrating capillary drain surfaces.





FIG. 8

is a cross-sectional view of the embodiment of a capillary drain surface illustrated in

FIG. 9

, taken along the lines indicated in FIG.


9


.





FIGS. 9-14

are partial plan views from the top of separate embodiments illustrating capillary drain surfaces.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

illustrates an embodiment of a printing mechanism, here shown as an inkjet printer


20


, constructed in accordance with the present invention, which may be used for printing on a variety of media, such as paper, transparencies, coated media, cardstock, photo quality papers, and envelopes in an industrial, office, home or other environment. A variety of inkjet printing mechanisms are commercially available. For instance, some of the printing mechanisms that may embody the concepts described herein include desk top printers, portable printing units, wide-format printers, hybrid electrophotographic-inkjet printers, copiers, cameras, video printers, and facsimile machines, to name a few. For convenience the concepts introduced herein are described in the environment of an inkjet printer


20


.




While it is apparent that the printer components may vary from model to model, the typical inkjet printer


20


includes a chassis


22


surrounded by a frame or casing enclosure


24


, typically of a plastic material. The printer


20


also has a printer controller, illustrated schematically as a microprocessor


26


, that receives instructions from a host device, such as a computer or personal digital assistant (PDA) (not shown). A screen coupled to the host device may also be used to display visual information to an operator, such as the printer status or a particular program being run on the host device. Printer host devices, such as computers and PDA's, their input devices, such as a keyboards, mouse devices, stylus devices, and output devices such as liquid crystal display screens and monitors are all well known to those skilled in the art.




A conventional print media handling system (not shown) may be used to advance a sheet of print media (not shown) from the media input tray


28


through a printzone


30


and to an output tray


31


. A carriage guide rod


32


is mounted to the chassis


22


to define a scanning axis


34


, with the guide rod


32


slidably supporting an inkjet carriage


36


for travel back and forth, reciprocally, across the printzone


30


. A conventional carriage drive motor (not shown) may be used to propel the carriage


36


in response to a control signal received from the controller


26


. To provide carriage positional feedback information to controller


26


, a conventional encoder strip (not shown) may be extended along the length of the printzone


30


and over a servicing region


38


. A conventional optical encoder reader may be mounted on the back surface of printhead carriage


36


to read positional information provided by the encoder strip, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,276,970, also assigned to the Hewlett-Packard Company, the present assignee. The manner of providing positional feedback information via the encoder strip reader may also be accomplished in a variety of ways known to those skilled in the art.




In the printzone


30


, the media sheet receives ink from an inkjet cartridge, such as a black ink cartridge


40


and a color inkjet cartridge


42


. The black ink cartridge


40


is illustrated herein as containing a pigment-based ink. For the purposes of illustration, color cartridge


42


is described as containing three separate dye-based inks which are colored cyan, magenta, and yellow, although it is apparent that the color cartridge


42


may also contain pigment-based inks in some implementations. It is apparent that other types of inks may also be used in the cartridges


40


and


42


, such as paraffin-based inks, as well as hybrid or composite inks having both dye and pigment characteristics. The illustrated printer


20


uses replaceable printhead cartridges where each cartridge has a reservoir that carries the entire ink supply as the printhead reciprocates over the printzone


30


. As used herein, the term “cartridge” may also refer to an “off-axis” ink delivery system, having main stationary reservoirs (not shown) for each ink (black, cyan, magenta, yellow, or other colors depending on the number of inks in the system) located in an ink supply region. In an off-axis system, the cartridges may be replenished by ink conveyed through a conventional flexible tubing system from the stationary main reservoirs which are located “off-axis” from the path of printhead travel, so only a small ink supply is propelled by carriage


36


across the printzone


30


. Other ink delivery or fluid delivery systems may also employ the systems described herein, such as replaceable ink supply cartridges which attach onto print cartridges having permanent or semi-permanent print heads.




The illustrated black cartridge


40


has a printhead


44


, and color cartridge


42


has a tri-color printhead


46


which ejects cyan, magenta, and yellow inks. The printheads


44


,


46


selectively eject ink to form an image on a sheet of media when in the printzone


30


. The printheads


44


,


46


each have an orifice plate with a plurality of nozzles formed therethrough in a manner well known to those skilled in the art. The nozzles of each printhead


44


,


46


are typically formed in at least one, but typically two columnar arrays along the orifice plate. Thus, the term “columnar” as used herein may be interpreted as “nearly columnar” or substantially columnar, and may include nozzle arrangements slightly offset from one another, for example, in a zigzag arrangement. Each columnar array is typically aligned in a longitudinal direction perpendicular to the scanning axis


34


, with the length of each array determining the maximum image swath for a single pass of the printhead. The printheads


44


,


46


are illustrated as thermal inkjet printheads, although other types of printheads, or ink drop generators may be used, such as piezoelectric printheads. The thermal printheads


44


,


46


typically include a plurality of resistors which are associated with the nozzles. Upon energizing a selected resistor, a bubble of gas is formed which ejects a droplet of ink from the nozzle and onto the print media when in the printzone


30


under the nozzle. The printhead resistors are selectively energized in response to firing command control signals delivered from the controller


26


to the printhead carriage


36


.




Between print jobs, the inkjet carriage


36


moves along the carriage guide rod


32


to the servicing region


38


where a service station


48


may perform various servicing functions known to those in the art, such as, priming, scraping, and capping for storage during periods of non-use to prevent ink from drying and clogging the inkjet printhead nozzles.





FIG. 2

shows the service station


48


in detail. A service station frame


50


is mounted to the chassis


22


, and houses a moveable pallet


52


. The moveable pallet


52


may be driven by a motor (not shown) to move in the frame


50


in the positive and negative Y-axis directions. The moveable pallet


52


may be driven by a rack and pinion gear powered by the service station motor in response to the microprocessor


26


according to methods known by those skilled in the art. An example of such a rack and pinion system in an inkjet cleaning service station can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,980,018, assigned to the Hewlett-Packard Company, also the current assignee. The end result is that pallet


52


may be moved in the positive Y-axis direction to a servicing position and in the negative Y-axis direction to an uncapped position. The pallet


52


supports a black printhead cap


54


and a tri-color printhead cap


56


to seal the printheads


44


and


46


, respectively, when the moveable pallet


52


is in the servicing position, here a capping position.





FIG. 2

also shows an ink drop detector system


58


supported by the service station frame


50


. Clearly, the ink drop detector system


58


could be mounted in other locations along the printhead scanning axis


34


, including the right side of the service station frame


50


, inside the service station


48


, or the opposite end of the printer from the service station


48


, for example. However, the illustrated location of the ink drop detector


58


is the preferred location, and will be used to illustrate the preferred principles of manufacture and operation, although other locations may be more suitable in other implementations.




The ink drop detector system


58


has a printed circuitboard assembly (PCA)


60


which is supported by the service station frame


50


. The PCA


60


has a conductive electrostatic sensing element


62


, or “target” on the upper forward end onto which ink droplets may be fired and detected according to the apparatus and method described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,190, assigned to the Hewlett-Packard Company, the present assignee. The target


62


is preferably constructed of gold. The PCA


60


contains various electronics (not shown) for filtering and amplification of drop detection signals received from the target


62


. An electrical conductor


64


links the ink drop detector


58


to controller


26


for drop detection signal processing. The ink drop detector system


58


also has a waste ink removal system


65


.




Attached to the PCA


60


is a stationary slider cover


66


which acts as a guide for the movement of a scraper slider


68


. The slider cover


66


may also be designed to shield electrical components on the ink drop detector


58


from ink aerosol generated from the printheads


44


,


46


. The scraper slider


68


is capable of being moved in the positive and negative Y-axis directions, and is biased towards the rear of the service station


48


(negative Y-axis direction) by a biasing member, such as a tension spring or return spring


70


, which is connected between the scraper slider


68


and a post projecting from the service station frame


50


. The scraper slider


68


has a scraper


72


attached or preferably overmolded onto a front end of the slider


68


. The front edge


74


of scraper


72


may be angled back (in the negative Y-axis and negative X-axis directions) towards the service station


48


as illustrated in FIG.


2


. This angled front edge


74


of the wiper helps to push ink and ink residue into the service station as well as providing a smooth transition while traveling over a capillary drain surface


76


which will be discussed shortly. The width of scraper


72


is sufficient to scrape the entire width of the target


62


. The scraper


72


is preferably constructed of an elastomer, such as a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) which is overmolded onto the slider


68


. The scraper


72


may also be constructed of a non-overmolded, rigid one-piece plastic. Additionally, the scraper


72


may be pressed onto the slider


68


as a separate part. Other methods of coupling a scraper


72


to the slider


68


will readily be apparent to those skilled in the art, and those methods are intended to be covered by the scope of this specification. The return spring


70


is preferably mounted at an angle above the slider


68


in order to impart a minimal downward scraping force to scraper


72


, thereby minimizing the wear of target


62


. The ink drop detector


58


also includes a capillary drain surface


76


which may be molded as part of frame


50


or coupled to frame


50


. The capillary drain surface


76


is a reservoir configured to receive ink scraped from the electrostatic sensing element


62


when the scraper


72


is moved in the positive Y-axis direction across the sensing element


62


and over the capillary drain surface


76


. Capillary drain surface


76


has channels


77


formed in the top of the capillary drain surface


76


. The channels


77


may vary in cross-sectional shape, depth, and spacing. Each channel


77


leads to and may be fluidically coupled to the service station


48


.




Movement is preferably imparted to the scraper slider


68


through movement of the moveable pallet


52


as the pallet


52


moves from the uncapped position shown in

FIG. 3

to the capped position shown in FIG.


4


.

FIGS. 3 and 4

also show a moveable pallet tower


78


which protrudes upwardly from the moveable pallet


52


on the side of the moveable pallet


52


adjacent to the scraper slider


68


. A scraper slider leg


80


, which is integral to the scraper slider


68


, protrudes inwardly and downwardly towards the moveable pallet


52


. The moveable pallet tower


78


is sized and positioned to engage the scraper slider leg


80


as the moveable pallet


52


is moved from the uncapped position of FIG.


3


. to the capped position of FIG.


4


. The force exerted by the moveable pallet tower


78


on the scraper slider leg


80


is greater than the opposing force of the return spring


70


, and moving the moveable pallet


52


causes the scraper slider


68


to move from the fully retracted position shown in

FIG. 3

to the fully engaged position of FIG.


4


. As the scraper slider


68


moves to the engaged position, the scraper


72


is scraped across the electrostatic target


62


and over the capillary drain surface


76


, as shown in FIG.


4


. The scraper


72


remains over the capillary drain surface


76


while the moveable pallet


52


is in the capped position. The capillary drain surface


76


may be designed so that it either contacts the scraper


72


or so that it does not contact scraper


72


. In either case, ink will be scraped off of the target


62


and deposited onto the capillary drain surface


76


for further removal. When the moveable pallet


52


is returned to the uncapped position, the scraper slider


68


is also retracted due to the force of return spring


70


. As moveable pallet


52


retracts, scraper


72


slides from the position shown in

FIG. 4

over the capillary drain surface


76


, back across the target


62


, and into the retracted position shown in FIG.


3


.




While the preferred method of actuating the scraper


72


is through the above-described movement of moveable pallet


52


, it should be apparent that other mechanisms may be substituted to act as the actuator for the scraper


72


, including, for example, a solenoid or a motor which operate in response to the controller


26


.




While the moveable pallet


52


is in the uncapped position and the scraper


72


is in the retracted position, as shown in

FIG. 3

, the inkjet carriage


36


may be moved along the carriage guide rod


32


until one or more of the printheads


44


,


46


are positioned directly over the electrostatic sensing target


62


. For illustration purposes, the tri-color printhead


46


is shown positioned over target


62


in

FIG. 3

, although it is apparent that either of the printheads


44


,


46


may be positioned over the target


62


either one at a time or in various simultaneous combinations if allowed by the size of the target


62


, the size of each printhead, and the spacing between the printheads.




The preferred spacing between the printheads


44


,


46


and the target


62


is on the order of two millimeters. Once the printhead


46


is properly aligned with the target


62


, the controller


26


causes ink droplets


82


to be fired from printhead


46


onto the target


62


. An electrical drop detect signal is generated by the ink droplets


82


as they contact the target


62


, and this signal is captured by the electronics of PCA


60


. The drop detect signal is then analyzed by controller


26


to determine whether or not various nozzles of printhead


46


are spitting ink properly or whether they are clogged. A preferred method of analyzing signals from an electrostatic target ink drop detector is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,190, also assigned to the present assignee, the Hewlett-Packard Company. Based on the determination made by the controller


26


as to whether each nozzle is functioning properly, the controller


26


may adjust the print masks to substitute functioning nozzles for any malfunctioning nozzles to provide consistent high-quality printed output while still using a printhead with permanently clogged nozzles.




In order to ensure that a reliable measurement may be made by the ink drop detector


58


, it is desirable to remove ink residue from the target


62


after a measurement or series of measurements have been made to prevent excessive deposits of dried ink from accumulating on the surface of target


62


. Dried ink deposits may short out the electrostatic sensing target


62


, degrading the ability of the ink drop detector system


58


to make measurements. Additionally, dried ink deposits may accumulate over time to form stalagmites which may eventually grow to interfere with the printheads


44


,


46


, possibly damaging nozzles which hit the stalagmites, a process known as “stalagmite crashes.”




Accordingly, the scraper


72


is scraped across the target


62


every time the moveable pallet


52


is moved to the capping position to seal the printheads


44


-


46


as described above. Prior to moving the pallet


52


, the inkjet carriage


36


is preferably moved past the ink drop detector


58


and over the servicing region


38


until black printhead cap


54


aligns with black printhead


44


, and tri-color printhead cap


56


aligns with tri-color printhead


46


. When the printheads


44


,


46


are aligned with the caps


54


,


56


the scraper slider


68


and the scraper


72


are free to move without interference from the cartridges


40


,


42


or the carriage


36


.




The previously described motion of the scraper


72


, as it traverses across the target


62


into the engaged position over the capillary drain surface


76


, forces the wet ink from the target


62


onto the capillary drain surface


76


while also pushing away any built-up deposits of dried ink on the target


62


which might otherwise have begun to form stalagmites.





FIGS. 5-7

illustrate example embodiments of the channels


77


which may be formed in the capillary drain surface


76


.

FIG. 5

illustrates channels


77


which are triangular in a cross-section taken parallel to the plane defined by the Z-axis and the Y-axis.

FIG. 6

illustrates channels


77


which are rectangular in a cross-section taken parallel to the plane defined by the Z-axis and the Y-axis.

FIG. 8

illustrates channels


77


which are arcuate in a cross-section taken parallel to the plane defined by the Z-axis and the Y-axis. Of course, many other cross-sectional shapes are possible, including cross-sectional shapes which vary in any given channel. The channels


77


illustrated in

FIGS. 5-7

are exaggerated to show detail, but in practice, the dimensions of the channels


77


may be much smaller to facilitate the formation of a capillary drain


84


at the base of the channel


77


, running the length of the channel


77


. Channels


77


which come to a substantial point, such as the channels


77


illustrated in

FIG. 5

, may be rather large compared to the capillary drain


84


which will naturally form at the narrowed point of the triangular channel


77


cross-section taken parallel to the plane defined by the Z-axis and the Y-axis. It should also be noted that the cross-sections in

FIGS. 5-7

are substantially orthogonal to the path fluid will follow, or “fluid path”, in the capillary drains


84


.





FIG. 8

is a cross-sectional view of an alternate embodiment of the capillary drain surface


76


, taken along the lines indicated in FIG.


9


.

FIG. 8

illustrates that it may also be desirable to form the capillary drains


84


in the channels


77


with a slope which leads downward to the service station


48


. Capillary drains


84


employing a slope similar to the embodiment of

FIG. 8

will have the force of gravity to help ink to flow towards the service station


48


in addition to capillary forces, although capillary forces alone should be sufficient to remove the ink residue.




When the scraper


72


travels over the capillary drain surface


76


, the scraper


72


may contact peak areas


86


. It is also possible to design the peak areas


86


such that the scraper


72


does not contact the peak areas


86


when the scraper


72


is traveling over the capillary drain surface


76


. The peak areas


86


lie between the channels


77


, and form a plane which is substantially parallel with the plane target


62


lies in. Preferably, the peak areas


86


lie in substantially the same plane as target


62


. The size of the peak areas


86


will vary depending on the size, cross-sectional shape, and spacing of the channels


77


. As the moveable pallet


52


moves from the uncapped position in

FIG. 3

to the capped position in

FIG. 4

, the scraper


72


is moved across the target


62


and over the capillary drain surface


76


as described above. Ink residue scraped by the scraper


72


is deposited into the channels


77


. The liquid ink residue flows into the capillary drains


84


formed in the bottom of the channels


77


and flows through capillary force and gravity to the service station


48


where it can conveniently be stored. Other receptacles, besides the service station


48


may also be used to receive the ink from the capillary drains


84


, such as a separate or stand-alone spittoon or receptacle. A separate spittoon or receptacle may also be used to separate the ink residue resultant from ink drop measurements from the ink residue which may otherwise be present in the service station


48


. Solid ink residue is pushed by the scraper


72


onto the peak areas


86


of the capillary drain surface


76


, and depending on the size of the solid ink residue with respect to the size of the channels


77


, the solid ink residue may be partially pushed into the channels


77


. The angled design of front edge


74


of scraper


72


will tend to sweep the solid ink residue off of the peak areas


86


and into the service station


48


.





FIGS. 9-14

are a partial plan view from the top of the wiper


72


, the target


62


, the capillary drain surface


76


, and illustrating several examples of patterns in which the channels


77


may be laid out. In

FIGS. 9-14

, the channels


77


are simplified by illustrating them as solid lines. There are numerous configurations of channels


77


which may be employed in a particular design for a capillary drain surface


76


. For example,

FIG. 9

illustrates channels


77


, defined by the capillary drain surface


76


, which are parallel. The channels


77


defined by the capillary drain surface


76


in

FIG. 10

radiate outwardly from a single point. The channels


77


in

FIG. 11

include a plurality of parallel sets of channels


77


defined by the capillary drain surface


76


. The channels


77


in

FIG. 12

include a plurality of parallel sets of channels


77


which intersect one another. The intersecting channels


77


of

FIG. 12

provide alternate capillary paths for liquid ink in the event that one part of a channel


77


is blocked in some way. The embodiment of a capillary drain surface


76


illustrated in

FIG. 13

includes manifold slots


88


. The manifold slots


88


intersect the channels


77


and provide a place for the liquid ink residue to accumulate before being removed by channels


77


. The manifold slots


88


also provide a means for the liquid ink to bypass channels


77


, which may be blocked, by providing many channels


77


for the ink to contact in a given manifold slot


88


.

FIG. 14

illustrates channels


77


which are not linear. The channels of

FIG. 14

are also not all parallel, and they intersect to allow a means to bypass portions of channels


77


which are blocked. Of course, there are many more configurations of channels


77


which may be formed in the capillary drain surface


76


. The spacing between channels


77


may be varied from one capillary drain surface


76


to another, or the spacing may even be varied between individual channels


77


on the same capillary drain surface


76


.




A printer control routine used by controller


26


is ideally adjusted to perform ink drop detection measurements just prior to capping. The immediately following process of moving the pallet


52


into the capping position activates the scraper


72


, and the scraper


72


removes the ink from the target


62


while the ink is still wet, thereby minimizing the possibility that stalagmites or dried ink are forming on the target


62


and allowing the liquid ink residue to be removed by the capillary action of the capillary drains


84


which are formed in the channels


77


on the capillary drain surface


76


.




When the moveable pallet


52


is moved to the uncapped position, scraper


72


is retracted by return spring


70


, providing clearance for the inkjet carriage


36


to move along carriage guide rod


32


and into the printzone


30


for printing. Using information from the ink drop detector measurements, print masks may be adjusted to replace clogged nozzles for optimum image quality.




A waste ink removal system


65


, used in conjunction with an electrostatic ink drop detector system


58


, provides the ability to remove wet ink from the target


62


to the service station


48


before it dries. A waste ink removal system


65


also provides the ability to remove dried-ink buildup before it has a chance to form stalagmites, thereby preventing damage to the printheads


44


,


46


. Therefore, a waste ink removal system enables a printing mechanism to reliably use ink drop detection readings to provide users with consistent, high-quality, and economical inkjet output despite printheads


44


,


46


which may clog over time. In discussing various components of the ink drop detector


58


and the service station


48


, various benefits have been noted above.




It is apparent that a variety of other structurally equivalent modifications and substitutions may be made to construct an ink drop detector waste ink removal system according to the concepts covered herein depending upon the particular implementation, while still falling within the scope of the claims below.



Claims
  • 1. A waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop sensor in a printing mechanism, comprising:a base; an actuator; a scraper, supported by the base, which scrapes ink residue from the ink drop sensor when moved by the actuator from a retracted position to an engaged position; and a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains onto which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position, wherein the capillary drains further comprise: a first capillary drain which travels in a first direction; and a second capillary drain which travels in a second direction.
  • 2. The waste ink removal system according to claim 1 wherein at least a portion of the first capillary drain intersects with at least a portion of the second capillary drain.
  • 3. A waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop sensor in a printing mechanism, comprising:a base; an actuator; a scraper, supported by the base, which scrapes ink residue from the ink drop sensor when moved by the actaator from a retracted position to an engaged position; and a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains onto which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position, wherein the capillary drains travel in substantially the same direction and wherein at least a portion of one capillary drain intersects with at least a portion of another capillary drain.
  • 4. A waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop sensor in a printing mechanism, comprising:a base; an actuator; a scraper, supported by the base, which scrapes ink residue from the ink drop sensor when moved by the actuator from a retracted position to an engaged position; and a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains onto which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position, wherein the reservoir further defines at least one manifold slot which intersects the capillary drains for the purpose of allowing liquid ink residue to collect before being removed to a service station by the capillary drains.
  • 5. A waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop sensor in a printing mechanism, comprising:a base; an actuator; a scraper, supported by the base, which scrapes ink residue from the ink drop sensor when moved by the actuator from a retracted position to an engaged position; and a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains onto which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position, wherein at least one of the capillary drains are sloped to allow gravity to assist capillary action in moving the ink residue to a receptacle.
  • 6. A printing mechanism, comprising:a printhead which selectively ejects ink; and a waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop sensor, comprising: a base; an actuator; a scraper, supported by the base, which scrapes ink residue from the ink drop sensor when moved by the actuator from a retracted position to an engaged position; and a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains into which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position, wherein the capillary drains further comprise: a first capillary drain which travels in a first direction; and a second capillary drain which travels in a second direction.
  • 7. The printing mechanism according to claim 6 wherein at least a portion of the first capillary drain intersects with at least a portion of the second capillary drain.
  • 8. A printing mechanism, comprising:a printhead which selectively ejects ink; and a waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop sensor, comprising: a base; an actuator; a scraper, supported by the base, which scrapes ink residue from the ink drop sensor when moved by the actuator from a retracted position to an engaged position; and a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains into which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position, wherein the capillary drains travel in substantially the same direction and wherein at least a portion of one capillary drain intersects with at least a portion of another capillary drain.
  • 9. A printing mechanism, comprising:a printhead which selectively ejects ink; and a waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop sensor, comprising: a base; an actuator; a scraper, supported by the base, which scrapes ink residue from the ink drop sensor when moved by the actuator from a retracted position to an engaged position; and a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains into which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position, wherein the reservoir further defines at least one manifold slot which intersects the capillary drains for the purpose of allowing liquid ink residue to collect before being removed to a service station by the capillary drains.
  • 10. A printing mechanism, comprising:a printhead which selectively ejects ink; and a waste ink removal system for cleaning ink residue from an ink drop sensor, comprising: a base; an actuator; a scraper, supported by the base, which scrapes ink residue from the ink drop sensor when moved by the actuator from a retracted position to an engaged position; and a reservoir defining a plurality of capillary drains into which the scraper deposits ink residue while moving to the engaged position, wherein at least one of the capillary drains are sloped to allow gravity to assist capillary action in moving the ink residue to a receptacle.
  • 11. A waste ink removal apparatus, comprising:a capillary drain surface which defines a plurality of channels; and a spittoon for receiving ink residue, wherein: the channels are coupled to the spittoon; the capillary drain surface further defines a capillary drain in the channels; each of the channels has a depth; each of the channels has a first end which is coupled to the spittoon; each of the channels has a second end which is opposite the first end; and the channel depth varies such that the depth at the first end of at least one of the channels is lower than the depth at the second end of the same channel.
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
4768045 Koto Aug 1988 A
5774139 Salzer et al. Jun 1998 A
6086190 Schantz et al. Jul 2000 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Hewlett-Packard Company patent application U.S. Ser. No. 09/773,881, filed Jan. 31, 2001, entitled: “Uni-Directional Waste Ink Removal System”.
Hewlett-Packard Company patent application U.S. Ser. No. 09/773,873, filed Jan. 31, 2001, entitled: “Ink Drop Detector Waste Ink Removal System”.
Hewlett-Packard Company patent application U.S. Ser. No. 09/915,461, filed Jul. 25, 2001, entitled: “Ink Drop Detector”.