This application claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-150231 filed on May 20, 2004, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference into the present application.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing an ink jet head used within an ink jet printer. The present invention also relates to the ink jet head itself.
2. Description of the Related Art
A known technique for manufacturing an ink jet head is to join together a cavity unit and an actuator unit. The cavity unit has a plurality of nozzles and a plurality of pressure chambers. Each of the pressure chambers joins with a corresponding one of the nozzles. The actuator unit comprises a plurality of piezoelectric elements. When the cavity unit and the actuator unit are joined together, each piezoelectric element is located to face a corresponding one of the pressure chambers. Deformation of the piezoelectric elements applies pressure to ink filling the pressure chambers.
At the time of a printing operation, the piezoelectric elements are selected in accordance with the pattern of printing desired. Voltage is applied to the selected piezoelectric elements. The piezoelectric elements that have voltage applied thereto deform due to piezoelectric effects. When the piezoelectric element deforms, there is a contraction in capacity of its corresponding pressure chamber, pressure is thus applied to the ink filling the pressure chamber, and the ink is discharged from the nozzle connecting with the pressure chamber.
In order to obtain satisfactory printing, it is important to control the ejection speed of the ink being discharged from the nozzle such that this speed is constant. If the ejection speed is too fast or too slow, it is consequently not possible to obtain satisfactory printing.
It is known that there are various causes of fluctuation in the ejection speed of the ink. When the present inventors were researching the causes for such fluctuation, they learnt that large fluctuations were caused by: nozzle diameter, capacitance of the piezoelectric element in the vicinity of the pressure chamber that connects with the nozzle, and the voltage applied to the piezoelectric element. That is: the greater the nozzle diameter, the slower the ink ejection speed; the greater the capacitance of the piezoelectric element, the faster the ink ejection speed; and the greater the voltage applied to the piezoelectric element, the faster the ink ejection speed.
Since the nozzle diameter of the cavity unit is extremely small, it is difficult to process all the nozzles such that they have a uniform diameter.
Numerous nozzles are present in the cavity unit, and consequently there is variation in nozzle diameter even within the same cavity unit. The printer manufacturer produces the cavity units in quantity, and consequently there is also variation in nozzle diameter between one cavity unit and the next. In this latter case, the average nozzle diameter of the nozzles within the cavity unit varies from one cavity unit to the next.
Improved processing techniques have made it possible to reduce the degree of variation in nozzle diameter within the same cavity unit. By contrast, it is difficult to reduce the variation whereby the average nozzle diameter of the nozzles within one cavity unit varies the average nozzle diameter within other cavity units.
Further, the actuator unit is usually manufactured by making a plurality of folds in an extremely thin sheet. Since the piezoelectric elements within the actuator unit are formed from the same sheets, there is a small degree of variation in the capacitance of the piezoelectric elements within the same actuator unit. By contrast, it is difficult to reduce the variation whereby the average capacitance of the piezoelectric elements within one actuator unit varies the average capacitance in other actuator units. It is difficult to reliably control the thickness of the extremely thin sheets. Therefore, it is assumed that the variation in capacitance is caused by the variation in the thickness of the sheets of each actuator unit.
As described above, there is a degree of variation that cannot be tolerated between the average nozzle diameter of nozzles within one cavity unit and that in other cavity units. Similarly, there is a degree of variation that cannot be tolerated between the average capacitance of the piezoelectric elements within one actuator unit and that in other actuator units.
Due to this variation between units, there is a variation that cannot be tolerated in the ejection speed of the ink discharged from differing ink jet heads each made by joining together a cavity unit and an actuator unit. As described earlier, each ink jet head comprises a plurality of nozzles. Improved processing techniques have made it possible to reduce the degree of variation in the ink ejection speed between the nozzles in the same ink jet head. However, it is extremely difficult to reduce the variation of the average ink ejection speed between ink jet heads.
The present applicants have succeeded in reducing the variation of the average ink ejection speed between ink jet heads. This was done by adopting the following technique (Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2003-11376; U.S. Pat. No. 6,796,631). The present applicants disclosed a relational expression that uses the average nozzle diameter of the nozzles within the cavity unit and the average capacitance of the piezoelectric elements within the actuator unit. This relational expression is used to calculate the voltage required to realize a determined average ink ejection speed when the cavity unit and the actuator unit have been joined together. When this relational expression is used, it is possible to determine the voltage to be applied to the ink jet head that has been formed by joining together these units. This is achieved by measuring the average nozzle diameter of the nozzles within the cavity unit, and the average capacitance of the piezoelectric elements within the actuator unit. When the voltage that has been determined in this manner is applied, the average ink ejection speed of the nozzles in the ink jet head is adjusted so as to be constant. Below, for the sake of simplicity, the average ink ejection speed of the nozzles within the ink jet head will be referred to as average ejection speed. The average nozzle diameter of the nozzles within the ink jet head will be referred to as average nozzle diameter. The average capacitance of the piezoelectric elements within the ink jet head will be referred to as average capacitance.
Usually, a power supply for applying voltage to an ink jet head is mounted on a printer main body side. In the prior method described above, a different voltage must be applied to each ink jet head. Furthermore, the voltage to be applied to the ink jet head mounted in the printer main body is not known until it is determined which ink jet head will be mounted. It is consequently necessary to provide the printer main body with a power supply in which the voltage can be adjusted. This creates the problem that the configuration of a power supply circuit becomes more complicated.
The present invention has been created to solve the above problem, and aims to present a technique in which a stable ink ejection speed can be realized, and in which it is possible to simplify the configuration of a power supply for applying voltage to an ink jet head.
There is great variation in the average ejection speed of differing ink jet heads obtained by the random joining together of a cavity unit and an actuator unit. The present inventors discovered that the variation in the average ejection speed can be reduced when the ink jet heads are obtained by joining together a cavity unit and an actuator unit in a precise manner.
That is, when an actuator unit having a large average capacitance is joined with a cavity unit having a large average nozzle diameter, an actuator unit having a fast average ejection speed is joined with a cavity unit having a slow average ejection speed. This cancels out the influence of the variation between the two. Alternatively, when an actuator unit having a small average capacitance is joined with a cavity unit having a small average nozzle diameter, an actuator unit having a slow average ejection speed is joined with a cavity unit having a fast average ejection speed. This cancels out the influence of the variation between the two. By joining the cavity unit and the actuator unit in this precise manner, variation in the average ejection speed of differing ink jet heads can be reduced.
The present inventors discovered that if there is a constant relation between the average nozzle diameter of the nozzles of the cavity unit and the average capacitance of the piezoelectric elements of the actuator unit, the average ejection speed of the ink jet heads is constant even without adjusting the voltage applied to the actuator units. They discovered that if a combination of a cavity unit and an actuator unit is determined such that their average nozzle diameter and average capacitance respectively fulfill this relation, and the cavity unit and the actuator unit combined with the cavity unit are assembled, a constant average ejection speed can be obtained. There is no need to adjust the voltage applied to the ink jet heads. Using the ink jet heads obtained in this manner allows the power supply of the ink jet printer to have a simpler configuration.
The present invention uses the information that it is possible to adjust the average ejection speed of the ink jet heads by means of selecting which cavity units and actuator units will be joined together. By applying this information, it is possible to mass-produce ink jet heads which have little variation in their average ejection speed. However, the present invention is not restricted to this use. The present invention can be applied so as to manufacture ink jet heads having a fast average ejection speed, and can be applied so as to manufacture ink jet heads having a slow average ejection speed. An actuator unit having a large average capacitance can be joined with a cavity unit having a small average nozzle diameter to manufacture an ink jet head having a fast average ejection speed. An actuator unit having a small average capacitance can be joined with a cavity unit having a large average nozzle diameter to manufacture an ink jet head having a slow average ejection speed.
In the present technique, the relation between the average nozzle diameter of the cavity unit and the average capacitance of the actuator unit is determined in advance. This relation is determined on the basis of the average ejection speed desired. In the case of mass producing ink jet heads having a small degree of variation in the average ejection speed from one ink jet head to the next, the relation is used whereby an actuator unit having a large average capacitance is joined with a cavity unit having a large average nozzle diameter. In the case of mass producing ink jet heads having a fast average ejection speed, the relation is used whereby an actuator unit having a large average capacitance is joined with a cavity unit having a small average nozzle diameter. In the case of mass producing ink jet heads having a slow average ejection speed, the relation is used whereby an actuator unit having a small average capacitance is joined with a cavity unit having a large average nozzle diameter.
Various methods can be used to measure the average nozzle diameter. For example, all the nozzle diameters in one cavity unit may be measured, and the average thereof calculated to obtain the average nozzle diameter. Alternatively, some nozzles can be selected randomly, and their average diameter can be calculated to obtain the average nozzle diameter. Further, in the case where there is little variation in the nozzle diameter of nozzles within the cavity unit, it is possible to measure the diameter of only one nozzle and to determine this diameter to be the average nozzle diameter. Alternatively, pressure applied to the ink can be held constant, and the average nozzle diameter can be calculated from the quantity of ink discharged at this time. The aforementioned average nozzle diameter can be expressed by various parameters that can be converted to average nozzle diameter. For example, the sum of the nozzle diameters is equivalent to average nozzle diameter.
Furthermore, various methods can also be used to measure the average capacitance. For example, the capacitance of all the piezoelectric elements in one actuator unit may be measured, and the average thereof calculated to obtain the average capacitance. Alternatively, some piezoelectric elements can be selected randomly, and their average capacitance can be calculated to obtain the average capacitance. Further, in the case where there is little variation in the capacitance of the piezoelectric elements in the actuator unit, it is possible to measure the capacitance of one piezoelectric element and to determine this capacitance to be the average capacitance. The total capacitance of all the piezoelectric elements in one actuator unit may be measured. The aforementioned average capacitance can be expressed by various parameters that can be converted to average capacitance. For example, the sum of capacitance of all the piezoelectric elements is equivalent to average capacitance. Further, since there is a relation between the capacitance of the piezoelectric element and the thickness of this piezoelectric element, the average thickness of each piezoelectric element can be used instead of its average capacitance.
Moreover, ‘voltage applied to the actuator unit’ refers to the voltage difference between applying voltage to the actuator unit and not applying voltage thereto, and does not refer to a constant application of voltage to the actuator unit.
A preferred embodiment of the present technique will now be described with reference to the drawings.
The ink jet head 100 comprises a cavity unit 1, an actuator unit 2, a flat cable 3, etc. The cavity unit 1 is formed from a plurality of metal plates. A detailed description of the configuration of the cavity unit 1 will be given later. The actuator unit 2 connects with an upper face of the cavity unit 1. The actuator unit 2 is formed from a plurality of piezoelectric sheets. A detailed description of the configuration of the actuator unit 2 will be given later. The flat cable 3 connects with an upper face of the actuator unit 2. Electric power from a printer main body is supplied to the actuator unit 2 via the flat cable 3.
Next, a detailed description of the configuration of the cavity unit 1 will be given with reference to FIGS. 2 to 5.
As is clear from
The nozzle plate 11 has rows of nozzles 51a, 51b, and 51c formed from nozzles 51 that have an extremely small diameter (approximately 20 to 23 (μm)) and are aligned in the X direction. In
Moreover, only the rows of nozzles 51a, 51b, and 51c are shown in
The spacer plate 12 is connected with an upper face of the nozzle plate 11. As shown in
Moreover, only the row of SP holes 52a, 52b, and 52c are shown in
In the case where the spacer plate 12 is overlapped with the nozzle plate 11, the nozzles 51 and the SP holes 52 are in a uniform location.
The damper plate 13 is connected with an upper face of the spacer plate 12. As shown in
In the case where the damper plate 13 is overlapped with the spacer plate 12, the DP holes 53 and the SP holes 52 are in a uniform location.
Five grooves 63a, 63b, 63c, 63d, and 63e, each having a base, are formed in a lower face of the damper plate 13 (see
The first manifold plate 14 is connected with an upper face of the damper plate 13. As shown in
In the case where the first manifold plate 14 is overlapped with the damper plate 13, the first MP holes 54 and the DP holes 53 are in a uniform location.
Further, five long holes 64a, 64b, 64c, 64d, and 64e are formed in the first manifold plate 14 (see
The second manifold plate 15 is connected with an upper face of the first manifold plate 14. The second manifold plate 15 has a shape identical with that of the first manifold plate 14. That is, the second manifold plate 15 has rows of second manifold plate holes (referred to hereafter as second MP holes) 55a to 55e (in
As is clear from
The supply plate 16 is connected with an upper face of the second manifold plate 15. As is clear from
In the case where the supply plate 16 is overlapped with the second manifold plate 15, the SL holes 56 and the second MP holes 55 are in a uniform location.
Further, rows of SL long holes 66a, 66b, and 66c—these being formed from small long holes that are extending in the Y direction—are formed in the supply plate 16. Only the rows of SL long holes 66a, 66b, and 66c are shown in
Furthermore, four ink supply holes 86a, 86b, 86c, and 86d are formed in the supply plate 16 (see
The base plate 17 is connected with the upper face of the supply plate 16. As shown in
In the case where the base plate 17 is overlapped with the supply plate 16, the first BP holes 57 and the SL holes 56 are in a uniform location.
Further, the base plate 17 has rows of second base plate holes 67a, 67b, and 67c (referred to hereafter as rows of second BP holes) that are formed from a plurality of holes 67 aligned in the X direction. Only three rows of second BP holes 67a, 67b, and 67c are shown in
In the case where the base plate 17 is overlapped with the supply plate 16, the second BP holes 67, and the discharge holes 76c of the long holes 66 are in a uniform location (see
Further, the base plate 17 has four ink supply holes 87a, 87b, 87c, and 87d. The ink supply holes 87a, 87b, 87c, and 87d pass through the base plate 17 in its direction of thickness. The three ink supply holes 87a, 87b, and 87c have the same size. The ink supply hole 87d is somewhat larger than the other ink supply holes 87a, etc. The ink supply hole 87a joins with the ink supply hole 86a of the supply plate 16. Similarly, the ink supply hole 87b joins with the ink supply hole 86b, the ink supply hole 87c joins with the ink supply hole 86c, and the ink supply hole 87d joins with the ink supply hole 86d.
The cavity plate 18 is connected with an upper face of the base plate 17. As shown in
As is clear from
As shown in
Further, the cavity plate 18 has four ink supply holes 88a, 88b, 88c, and 88d. The ink supply holes 88a, 88b, 88c, and 88d pass through the cavity plate 18 in its direction of thickness. The three ink supply holes 88a, 88b, and 88c have the same size. The ink supply hole 88d is somewhat larger than the other ink supply holes 88a, etc. The ink supply hole 88a joins with the ink supply hole 87a of the base plate 17. Similarly, the ink supply hole 88b joins with the ink supply hole 87b, the ink supply hole 88c joins with the ink supply hole 87c, and the ink supply hole 88d joins with the ink supply hole 87d.
A filter body 20 is bonded, using adhesive or the like, to an upper face of the cavity plate 18 (see
Next, the configuration of the actuator unit 2 will be described with reference to
The sheets 41a, 41b, 41c, and 41d are common electrode sheets, and common electrodes 141a, 141b, 141c, and 141d are provided on respective upper faces thereof.
The sheets 42a, 42b, and 42c are separate electrode sheets, and separate electrodes 144 are provided on respective upper faces thereof. The number 144 is not present in
The common electrode sheets 41a, 41b, 41c, and 41d, and the separate electrode sheets 42a, 42b, and 42c are stacked as follows: the common electrode sheet 41a is the lowest layer, and then 42a, 41b, 42b, 41c, 42c, and 41d are stacked sequentially. In this case, the separate electrodes 144a of the separate electrode sheet 42a, the separate electrodes 144b of the separate electrode sheet 42b, and the separate electrodes 144c of the separate electrode sheet 42c are located so as to be on the same location in the XY direction.
A further two sheets 43a and 43b are stacked above the common electrode sheet 41d. Surface electrodes 143a (not shown in
Further, surface electrodes 143b (shown in
Since the actuator unit 2 is configured in the above manner, when current is carried through each surface electrode 143a, piezoelectric effects cause deformation between the separate electrodes 144a to 144c which are connected with the surface electrode 143a, and the common electrodes 141a to 141d. For example, in the case where current is carried through the separate electrodes 144a-1, 144b-1, and 144c-1 of
The flat cable 3 shown in
Electric power is carried to any of the surface electrodes 143a in accordance with the content of the image to be printed by the printer. For example, in a case where power is transmitted to the surface electrode 143a corresponding to the separate electrodes 144a-1, 144b-1, and 144c-1 shown in
When, for example, the internal pressure is reduced of the pressure chamber 58 at the left in
Next is a description of a manufacturing method for an ink jet printer 100 of the present embodiment.
(1) Step for Deriving a Relation Between Average Nozzle Diameter and Average Capacitance such that a Constant Ink Ejection Speed is Obtained when a Determined Voltage is Applied
In order to obtain this relation, the present inventors provided several actuator units 2 in which the average capacitance differed of the piezoelectric elements 200, and joined each actuator unit 2 with a cavity unit 1. All the cavity units 1 had an identical average nozzle diameter. A determined voltage was then applied to the piezoelectric elements 200 of the actuator units 2, and the variation in ink ejection speed was examined.
Various methods can be used to measure the average nozzle diameter of the cavity units 1. For example, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2003-11376 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,796,631), picture processing may be performed to highlight the edges of a magnified image of each nozzle 51, and then the diameter of all the nozzles 51 may be measured and their average calculated. Alternatively, rather than measuring the nozzle diameter of all the nozzles 51, various nozzles 51 may be picked out, their diameter is measured, and the average is calculated. Alternatively, in the case where there is no great variation in the nozzle diameter of the nozzles 51 within one cavity unit 1, the diameter of one nozzle 51 may be measured, and this measurement may be used as the average nozzle diameter.
Furthermore, various methods can be used to measure the average capacitance. For example, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-11376 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,796,631), voltage may be applied to each of the surface electrodes 143a, and the capacitance of each of the piezoelectric elements 200 may be measured separately to calculate the average capacitance. Alternatively, various surface electrodes 143a may be picked out, their capacitance is measured, and the average is calculated. Alternatively, in the case where there is no great variation in the capacitance of the piezoelectric elements 200 within one actuator unit 2, the capacitance of one piezoelectric element 200 may be measured, and this measurement may be used as the average capacitance. An impedance analyzer, for example, may be used to measure capacitance.
Furthermore, various methods can be used to measure the ink ejection speed. For example, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-11376 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,796,631), the ink ejection speed may be measured from the location of the ink before and after an extremely short time has elapsed. The ink ejection speed is the average of the ink discharged from each nozzle 51 in one cavity unit 1. In fact, the ink ejection speed of all the nozzles is measured, and their average is calculated.
It is clear from
The present inventors also examined how, in the case where the voltage applied is constant, and average capacitance is constant, the average ejection speed of the ink changes as the average nozzle diameter changes.
The methods for measuring the average nozzle diameter, the average capacitance, and the ink ejection speed, are identical with those above, and a description thereof is omitted here.
It is clear from
To obtain an identical ink ejection speed when an identical voltage is applied, it is clear from the above results that it is preferred that an actuator unit 2 having a large average capacitance is joined with a cavity unit 1 having a large average nozzle diameter. Further, it is preferred that an actuator unit 2 having a small average capacitance is joined with a cavity unit 1 having a small average nozzle diameter. In the present embodiment, the slope of the graphs in FIGS. 6(a) and (b) (both of which have identical voltage) is used to find the relation between average nozzle diameter and average capacitance for obtaining a constant ink ejection speed in the case where a determined voltage is applied. Specifically, in the case where a determined voltage is applied and a constant ink ejection speed can be obtained, the rate of change is found for the average capacitance with respect to the average nozzle diameter. In the present embodiment, joining together a cavity unit 1 having an average nozzle diameter of 21 (μm) and an actuator unit 2 having an average capacitance of 960 pF was used as a standard, and a relation (below, this will be referred to as average nozzle diameter—average capacitance information) was used in accordance with the rate of change (20 pF/0.5 μm) from this standard. That is, an actuator unit 2 having an average capacitance of 980 pF is selected for a cavity unit 1 having an average nozzle diameter of 21.5 (μm), an actuator unit 2 having an average capacitance of 1000 pF is selected for a cavity unit 1 having an average nozzle diameter of 22.0 (μm), an actuator unit 2 having an average capacitance of 940 pF is selected for a cavity unit 1 having an average nozzle diameter of 20.5 (μm), and an actuator unit 2 having an average capacitance of 920 pF is selected for a cavity unit 1 having an average nozzle diameter of 20.0 (μm).
(2) Step for Manufacturing the Cavity Unit 1
The cavity unit 1 is manufactured by bonding the aforementioned sheets 11 to 18. The holes 51 to 58, 64 to 67, the grooves 63, etc. of the sheets are formed by etching, electrical discharge machining, plasma machining, laser machining, etc. The filter parts 20a to 20d are formed in the filter body 20 by laser machining, etc. The filter body 20 is formed from synthetic resin such as polyimide, or the like. In the case where the filter body 20 is formed from metal, the filter parts 20a to 20d may be formed by electroforming.
The bonding of the sheets 11 to 18 is performed as follows. First the following two sheets are bonded to manufacture a first sub-unit: the nozzle plate 11 and the spacer plate 12. Then the following six sheets are bonded to manufacture a second sub-unit: the damper plate 13, the first manifold plate 14, the second manifold plate 15, the supply plate 16, the base plate 17, and the cavity plate 18. Then the first and the second sub-units are bonded to manufacture the cavity unit 1.
(3) Step for Manufacturing the Actuator Unit 2
The actuator unit 2 is manufactured by bonding the aforementioned sheets 41a to 41d, 42a to 42c, 43a, and 43d (see
(4) Step for Measuring the Average Nozzle Diameter of the Cavity Unit 1
The average nozzle diameter is measured for each of the cavity units 1 that has been manufactured. In the present embodiment, picture processing is performed to highlight the edges of a magnified image of each nozzle 51, and then the diameter of all the nozzles 51 is measured and their average is calculated. However, methods other than that used in the present embodiment may also be used to measure the average nozzle diameter. Since the other methods have been described above, a description thereof is omitted here.
(5) Step for of Measuring the Average Capacitance of the Actuator Unit 2
The average capacitance is measured for each of the actuator units 2 that have been manufactured. In the present embodiment, voltage is applied to each of the surface electrodes 143a, and the capacitance of each of the piezoelectric elements 200 is measured separately to measure the average capacitance. However, methods other than that used in the present embodiment may also be used to measure the average capacitance. Since the other methods have been described above, a description thereof is omitted here.
(6) Step for Matching the Cavity Unit 1 and the Actuator Unit 2
The average nozzle diameter of each cavity unit 1 and the average capacitance of each actuator unit 2 can be obtained by means of the above measuring processes. The matching of the cavity unit 1 and the actuator unit 2 is determined based on the average nozzle diameter—average capacitance information described above. That is, in the case of, for example, a cavity unit 1 having an average nozzle diameter of 21 (μm), it is determined that this cavity unit 1 should be matched with an actuator unit 2 having an average capacitance of 960 (pF). In another example, in the case of a cavity unit 1 having a nozzle diameter of 21.5 (μm), it is determined that this cavity unit 1 should be matched with an actuator unit 2 having an average capacitance of 980 (pF). In the case of, for example, a cavity unit 1 having a nozzle diameter of 20.0 (μm), it is determined that this cavity unit 1 should be matched with an actuator unit 2 having an average capacitance of 920 (pF).
(7) Step for Bonding the Cavity Unit 1 and the Actuator Unit 2 after Matching has been Determined
The cavity unit 1 and the actuator unit 2 are bonded after being matched in the above process. An adhesive sheet (not shown) is used for this bonding. The adhesive sheet (not shown) consisting of a synthetic resin material that cannot be permeated by water is applied to the entirety of the lower face of the plate type actuator unit 2.
(8) Step for Connecting the Flexible Flat Cable 3 to the Actuator Unit 2
The flat cable 3 is caused to overlap with and is pressed onto the upper face of the actuator unit 2. Wiring patterns (not shown) of the flat cable 3 are electrically connected with the surface electrodes 143a and 143b.
Performing the aforementioned processes (1) to (8) completes the ink jet head 100.
In the present embodiment, the matching of the cavity unit 1 and the actuator unit 2 is determined based on the average nozzle diameter—average capacitance information. Consequently, even if there is variation in the average nozzle diameter or average capacitance, it is easy to determine which cavity unit 1 and actuator unit 2 should be matched so as to obtain identical ink ejection speed by means of applying an identical voltage. By using the manufacturing method of the present embodiment, it is possible to obtain a constant ink ejection speed without changing the voltage applied. As a result, the power supply circuit for applying voltage to the ink jet head 100 needs to provide only one type of voltage, and it thus becomes a simple configuration.
In the above embodiment, the average nozzle diameter and average capacitance, and the rate of change of the average capacitance with respect to the average nozzle diameter, were used as standard ‘average nozzle diameter—average capacitance information’. However, a table such as the following may also be used: a table defines a range of average capacitance related to a range of average nozzle diameter so as to maintain ink ejection speed within a specified range when a constant voltage is applied. For example, a range of 20.75 to 21.25 (μm) of average nozzle diameter is coupled to a range of 950 to 970 (pF) of average capacitance, and a range of 21.25 to 21.75 (μm) of average nozzle diameter is coupled to a range of 970 to 990 (pF) of average capacitance. The matching of the cavity unit 1 and the actuator unit 2 can be determined from the range of this table. Since there is a wide degree of freedom in selection, matching can be determined more easily.
With the ink jet head 100 manufactured in accordance with the present embodiment, identical ink ejection speed can be obtained by means of applying identical voltage, and consequently there is no need to vary the settings of the power supply for applying voltage for each ink jet head. As a result, the structure of the printer main body can be simplified. Furthermore, in the case of manufacturing a printer in which a plurality of ink jet heads is mounted, there is no need to select ink jet heads which require the same voltage. Manufacturing efficiency can thus be increased, and manufacturing costs can be decreased.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004-150231 | May 2004 | JP | national |