Several methods are currently used to determine the height of ink in the ink supply reservoirs in printers such as solid ink jet printers. The word “printer” as used herein encompasses any apparatus, such as digital copier, bookmaking machine, facsimile machine, multi-function machine, etc. which performs a print outputting function for any purpose. Examples of the methods include: (1) conductive level sense probe; (2) over-driven thermistor; and (3) vibrating beam.
The conductive level sense probe involves a single-point method of determining if the reservoir is full. When the height of the ink rises to a level touching the probe, an electrical current can pass from the probe through the ink to ground, thereby registering that the ink is at the height of the probe tip.
The over-driven thermistor also involves a single-point method of determining ink height. When the thermistor is covered by ink, the thermistor is quenched to a lower temperature. This causes the thermistor to send a different resistance reading to a controller indicating that the ink is at the height of the thermistor.
The vibrating beam or “twanger” is a form of continuous ink level sensing. The resonance of the beam changes as a function of the amount of the beam immersed in ink (i.e., the ink level).
An embodiment is an ink reservoir level sensing apparatus. The apparatus includes a lower probe positioned to be inserted in a lower portion of an ink reservoir and an upper probe arranged above the lower probe. The upper probe is shaped to extend to an upper portion of the ink reservoir. The apparatus further includes an electrode arranged adjacent to the upper and lower probes. The apparatus further includes a controller adapted to drive an AC signal to the electrode and to detect a current flow from the electrode to the upper and lower probes.
Another embodiment is an ink reservoir level sensing system that includes an ink reservoir, a means for measuring a first conductivity of ink in a bottom portion of the reservoir, a means for measuring a second conductivity of ink in the reservoir, and a means for comparing the first and second conductivities of the ink to determine an amount of ink in the reservoir. The second conductivity varies continuously relative to a level of ink in the reservoir.
Another embodiment is a method of sensing a level of ink in a reservoir that includes positioning a lower probe in a lower portion of the reservoir, positioning an upper probe in the reservoir above the lower probe extending to an upper portion of the reservoir, and positioning an electrode in the reservoir next to the lower and upper probes. The method further includes driving an AC signal to the electrode, detecting current flows from the electrode to the lower and upper probes, and determining a level of ink in the reservoir by comparing the current flows to the lower and upper probes.
“The ink level sensor 20 is configured to measure the level of ink in each of the reservoirs 22, 24, 26 and 18 in a continuous manner. Previous ink level sensors could only detect the level of ink at designated heights when the ink cam in contact with an electrode positioned at the designated height. Adding more electrodes arrayed across the height of the reservoir was the only way to sense the ink level at varying heights. The ink level sensor 20 senses the height of the ink continuously because it measures a base line conductivity of the ink present in the reservoir with a lower probe 46 shown in
The previous methods of sensing ink level can be thought of as a digital method, measuring only distinct points in the reservoir. The ink level sensor 20, in contrast, can be thought of as an analog method because the ink is measured over any continuous level of ink in a reservoir.
The ink level sensor 20 in
The pin connector 38 can further connect to a controller 40 shown in
Controller 40 shown in
An AC signal 65 is driven by the controller 40 to electrode 42 inserted in the ink reservoir 28. The ink 66 conducts the AC signal to the lower probe 46 and to the upper probe 48.
The lower probe 46 is electrically connected to the negative input 72 of op/amp 68 in controller 40. This negative input 72 forms a virtual ground by connecting the positive input 69 of op/amp 68 to ground and also connecting the negative input 72 of op/amp 68 through a resistor to the output of op/amp 68. This virtual ground circuit eliminates any stray currents that can arise from the board 36 shown in
The upper probe 48 is electrically connected to the negative input 73 of op/amp 70 in controller 40. This negative input 73 forms a virtual ground by connecting the positive input 71 of op/amp 70 to ground and also connecting the negative input 73 of op/amp 70 through a resistor to the output of the op/amp 70. This virtual ground circuit eliminates any stray currents that can arise from the board 36 shown in
The controller 40 compares the variable Vupper with the base value of Vlower. The comparison can be accomplished by connecting the outputs of the virtually grounding op/amps 68, 70 to the inputs of another op/amp (not shown) which itself would output the ratio of the voltage outputs of the op/amps 70, 68. Any other methods of comparing voltages commonly known in the art are contemplated to be within the scope of this disclosure. This comparison gives a continuous measurement of the level of ink 66 in reservoir 28. The conductance of ink varies over types of inks and even within the same type of ink at different temperatures. The two probes 46, 48 result in a comparison of two voltages outputted by virtually grounding op/amps. Thus, no matter what type of ink or what temperature the ink, a comparison of conductance is measured.
A single probe measuring the variation of conductance of varying levels of ink would not produce accurate level measurements because the conductance measured of ink at a single level in the reservoir would vary over types of inks and even vary with the same ink at differing temperatures.
A method of sensing the level of ink in an ink reservoir according to another embodiment of the invention will now be described by referring to
At 80, the lower probe 46, upper probe 48 and electrode 42 are positioned in the ink reservoir 28. The lower probe 46 is positioned in a lower portion of the ink reservoir 66. The upper probe 48 is positioned above the lower probe 46 and extends to an upper portion of the ink reservoir 28. The electrode 42 is positioned next to the lower and upper probes 46, 48.
At 80, positioning the probes 46, 48 and electrode 42 in an ink reservoir can include positioning lower probes 46 into adjacent ink reservoirs 26 and 28 and positioning upper probes 48 above each of the lower probes 46 in each of the adjacent ink reservoirs 26 and 28. A single electrode 42 can then be positioned next the probes 46, 48 in both adjacent ink reservoirs 26 and 28.
At 82 the lower probe is coupled to a virtually grounding op-amp 68 and the upper probe 48 is coupled to another virtually grounding op-amp 70. At 84, an AC signal is driven to the electrode 42.
At 86, a conductivity of the ink 66 contacting the lower probe 46 is measured by detecting a current flow from the electrode 42 to the lower probe 46 in the lower portion of the ink reservoir 28.
At 88, a conductivity of ink 66 contacting the upper probe 48 is measured by detecting a current flow from the electrode 42 to the upper probe 48. The level of conductivity varies continuously relative to the amount of ink 66 contacting the surface area of the upper probe 48.
As an alternative, a full reservoir condition can be detected when a larger conductance is measure from an upper probe 49 shown in
At 90, the level of ink in the ink reservoir 28 is determined by comparing the detected current flows of the lower probe 46 and upper probe 48. The current flow detected from the electrode 42 to the upper probe 48 varies with the height of the ink 66. The current flow from the electrode 42 to the lower probe 46 remains constant and gives a base value from which the current flow to the upper probe 48 is compared.
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5291121 | Neale et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5742308 | Cowger et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6318826 | Froger et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6929343 | Farr et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20050140742 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050243111 | Eguchi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070076023 A1 | Apr 2007 | US |