The present invention relates generally to the field of flexographic printing and, more particularly, to a portable flexographic ink proofing apparatus for providing proofs of ink samples.
In the field of flexographic printing ink samples are obtained by drawing ink over a substrate using a hand ink proofer of the type manufactured by Harper Companies International of Charlotte, N.C. The ink is applied to the substrate by manually rolling the hand proofer across the substrate. Manual ink proofer tools are utilized for proofing ink colors in order to accurately predict the results to be obtained by running a selected ink specimen in a printing press. A computer microscope is then used to view the ink smear on the substrate. The computer then indicates to the operator various color components to be added to the ink in order to achieve the desired ink coloration.
In a flexographic printing operation, rubber plates are utilized for delivering the ink to the stock or paper to be printed. A flexographic ink technician is usually given an ink specimen that has been determined to be acceptable for use on a particular press, and a production run sample, to be used as the standard for color and density. One of the most difficult tasks facing a flexographic ink technician is proofing ink in a manner so that the color will duplicate the color of the production run sample from the flexographic printing press. It is well known among those skilled in the art that if three trained technicians pull an ink proof, using the same ink on the same hand proofer tool, three different color shades will result.
Color shade on a flexographic printing press is dependent on the ink film thickness applied to the substrate or stock. The ink film thickness is determined by the speed of the press, the pressure applied between the printing plate and paper (i.e., impression), and the pressure between the rollers on the printing unit. Similarly, the shade of a color on a flexographic hand proofer tool is also dependent on the ink film thickness applied to the substrate, which is again determined by the speed at which the technician pulls the hand proofer across the substrate, and the impression pressure the technician applies to the hand proofer while moving it across the substrate. Thus, the speed and impression is totally dependent on the manual skill of the flexographic ink technician, while the only variable not controlled by the technician is the pressure between the ink roller and transfer roller of the manual proofer tool.
Accordingly, there is a need for an ink proofer arrangement that provides a reliable, consistent and repeatable ink proof on a substrate, irrespective of the experience of the ink technician producing the ink proof. An approach that addresses the aforementioned problems, as well as other related problems, is therefore desirable.
The ink proofer of the present invention substantially meets the aforementioned needs of the industry. According to one aspect of the invention, the ink proofer arrangement provides for the constant speed roller which feeds paper through the device at a constant speed to generate a uniform ink smear. Further, the ink proofer arrangement provides for regulated pressure between the roller and an underlying drum on which the roller bears. Additionally, in one example embodiment, the ink proofer arrangement is explosion proof being an all pneumatic device.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the ink proofer arrangement includes a rotating drum that is disposed opposite and beneath a proofer roll of a hand ink proofer tool. The proofer roll of the proofer tool is elevated above the rotating drum and is lowered into compressive rotatable engagement with the rotating drum when the substrate (preferably paper) is introduced between the drum and the roller. The substrate advances between the roller and the drum at a selected speed. The pressure of the roller acting on the drum is selectable by an operator. Prior to the substrate paying out, a sensor senses the imminent end of the substrate and raises the roller to prevent contamination by being in contact with the drum when no substrate is present.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a digital speed control and an adjustable print pressure mechanism are provided such that the speed, impression and roller pressure are completely controlled by the ink proof technician, whereby the same ink color will be duplicated each time the apparatus is used.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present invention. The figures in the detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify these embodiments.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The present invention is generally directed to an ink proofer arrangement that is adapted to operate with a variety of hand ink proofer devices to provide ink proofs that are reliable and repeatable and that are consistent from one ink proof to another. While the present invention is not necessarily limited to such an application, the invention will be better appreciated using a discussion of example embodiments in such a specific context.
In one example embodiment, an ink proofer arrangement is adapted to be used with an ink proofer tool having an ink transfer roller. The ink proofer arrangement further includes a cylindrical roller and a drive motor adapted to rotate the cylindrical roller. In addition, a first movable mounting assembly is included that retains the ink proofer tool adjacent to and in a non-contact position with the cylindrical roller. The proofer arrangement further includes a first variable pressure assembly coupled to the mounting assembly and adapted to move the ink proofer tool into a contact pressure position with the cylindrical roller and is further adapted to move the ink proofer tool into a non-contact position, wherein the transfer roller is adapted to transfer ink to a substrate that is inserted between the roller and the transfer roller of the ink proofer tool when the drive motor is engaged and the ink proofer tool is in the contact position.
In another related embodiment, an ink proofer arrangement is adapted to be used with an ink proofer tool, the ink proofer tool including an ink transfer roller, a cylindrical roller and a drive motor adapted to rotate the roller. In addition, a mounting assembly is provided that is adapted to retain the ink proofer tool adjacent to and in a non-contact position with the roller. The ink proofer arrangement also includes a movable support assembly adapted to support the roller and a first variable pressure assembly coupled to the movable support assembly and adapted to move the roller into a contact with pressure position with the ink proofer and to move the roller into a non-contact position with the ink proofer tool, wherein the ink transfer roller is adapted to transfer ink to a substrate that is inserted between the roller and the transfer roll of the ink proofer tool when the drive motor is engaged.
Proofer arrangement 100 further includes a housing 103, which in this example embodiment is made to be spill proof such that the proofer arrangement can be washed down easily without damaging any of the internal components. Mounted on housing 103 are a number of control switches and displays that comprise control panel 104. Protruding from the upper surface of housing 103 is a rubber roller 106 that is driven by a drive motor (for moving a substrate in the direction of arrow A). Proofer arrangement 100 is also configurable to have roller 106 rotate in the opposite direction so that the arrangement is bi-directional with respect to movement of the substrate. Base unit 102 further includes support plates 108, 110 which can be mounted optionally on base unit 102 when the substrate is of considerable length.
Manual ink proofer tool 1 is supported on base unit 102 via an ink proofer tool support arrangement 140. In its simplest form proofer tool support arrangement 140 is simply an angled support structure that is affixed to the top of base unit 102 for supporting ink proofer tool 1 at a predetermined angle. In this particular embodiment, tool support arrangement 140 is designed to be movable in the vertical direction so as to raise and lower ink proofer tool 1 vertical up and away from roller 106 or vertically down and in contact with roller 106. Tool support arrangement 140 includes a vertical fix support bracket 142 that is coupled to a proofer tool support plate 144 that is in turn coupled to a proofer tool movement mechanism 146 which moves vertically up and down through the surface of the base unit 102 thereby moving ink proofer tool 1 as desired. Ink proofer tool 1 is secured to support arrangement 140 via a proofer tool secure plate 148 and a fastening screw 152.
Anilox roll 23 is located within nesting subframe 11 and its pins such as anilox roll pin 43 extends from anilox roll 23 to extend at least partially into or even through an elongated set of orifices, one on each of side frames 7 and 9, illustrated by elongated orifice 20 shown in
Connected to subframe blade adjustment means holder 17 is blade adjustment means 19, in this case, a rotatable dial which includes a screw 21 which is threaded and passes through a screw tapped orifice in holder 17. At the end of screw 21 is blade holder 35 and blade 37 set up as a follower-type doctor blade so that ink may be located behind the doctor blade and the blade will both act as a wiping blade and as a distributing fountain. By rotation of blade adjustment means 19, for example clockwise to go upwardly away from subframe 11 and counterclockwise to go downwardly toward it, blade 37 may be adjusted against the surface of anilox roll 23 accordingly. In this device 1, the anilox roll 23 has bearings such as bearings 33 so as to facilitate its ease of rolling. Thus, the bearings are adapted to fit over the anilox roll pins such as pin 43 and are contained within a washer-type fitting which nests within the subframe 11. The side frames 7 and 9 each also include a transfer roll pin holding insert such as insert 39. This is adapted to receive the transfer roll pins such as pin 41, as shown.
Referring again to handle 3 and hollow member 49, there is a pressure rod release means 53 which includes a cut-out as shown, pressure rod release means collar 55 and pressure rod release means lever 51, as well as spring 57. Spring 57 is strategically located and held in place so as to push collar 55 and therefore pressure rod adjustment means 29 and pressure rod 27 against the subframe 11. When pressure rod release means lever 51 is located in its first position, shown as first position 45, the pressure rod 27 is engaged with subframe 11 and, therefore under pressure. The pressure rod release means lever 51 may be pushed clockwise then away from the subframe 11 and then counterclockwise (in other words, in a “U” direction), so as to move from a first position 45 to second position 47. In second position 47, pressure rod 27 is totally disengaged from subframe 11 and subframe 11 may be easily removed or rotated for cleaning of the anilox roll 23 without affecting, altering or changing in any way the setting and therefore the pressure relationship which will be re-achieved when pressure rod release means lever 51 is moved from second position 47 back to first position 45.
Referring now to
As illustrated in
Referring to
Referring briefly to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In an alternative embodiment, system 250 can be configured to add a pressure cylinder to roller arrangement such that the roller is moved vertically into window 219 when button 226 is depressed and moves away from window 219 when button 226 is released. In yet another embodiment, as schematically depicted by the arrows in
Proofer arrangement 100 is also configured to be self-equalizing thereby providing a wrist action to allow the rolls on the ink proofer tool 1 and roller 106 to conform to any movement of wobble during the ink proofing process. By using a pneumatic drive mechanism the concerns that ink technicians which utilize solvents with low flash points may be alleviated when using the present invention. In a relating embodiment the drum of roller 106 has a speed sensing device that will read out in feet per minute which will provide an at actual speed read out with control and various speed controls. Proofer arrangement 100 also includes a down pressure gauge to determine how many pounds of pressure is being applied with the ink proofer tool 1.
In this example embodiment, the drive motor is preferably of the air type (½ horse power) but proofer arrangement 100 can also be configured to operate with a clutch drive and clutch brake assembly. In other embodiments, the drive motor can include a DC motor, an electric motor or an AC motor. In this example embodiment, roller 106 is comprised of a natural rubber coating of 70-75 Durometer hardness bonded onto an aluminum roll. Proofer arrangement 100 enables the user of the present invention to achieve or reproduce the same angles of printing encountered during commercial flexographic printing while faster proofing speeds are provided by the air motor driven motor.
One example embodiment of the ink proofer arrangement can proof a maximum width of six inches. Further, the proofer will process almost any length of substrate desired. A minimum of 9½ inches of substrate is required. Additional widths may be specified in increments of 2 inches up to a width of 14 inches.
The ink proofer arrangement may also be adjusted for proofing speeds of 50 to 1,500 feet per minute with other ranges being available as desired. The ink proofer includes precision readouts for speed of the substrate and down pressure on the proofer arrangement.
In one example embodiment, ink proofer arrangement 100 is fully automatic, but manual operations are also contemplated. The substrate is introduced in the left side of the ink proofer arrangement (denoted by arrow A) and by pressing the actuation button, proofer arrangement 100 automatically feeds the substrate through the proofer arrangement and the substrate is discharged on the right side.
The various embodiments of the present invention provide ink proofer arrangements, primarily directed to the flexographic field, that are portable and provide the advantages of constant speed and constant pressure to enable repeatability of ink proofs irrespective of the experience of the ink proofer arrangement user.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the essential attributes thereof; therefore, the illustrated embodiments should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, reference being made to the appended claims rather than to the foregoing description to indicate the scope of the invention.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/976,194 filed Oct. 28, 2004, now abandoned which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/219,018, filed Aug. 14, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,001 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/312,595 filed Aug. 15, 2001, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1442287 | Mattern | Jan 1923 | A |
2118238 | Smith | May 1938 | A |
2663254 | Parrish | Dec 1953 | A |
2985102 | Vandercook | May 1961 | A |
2990715 | Bradt | Jul 1961 | A |
2991713 | McFarland | Jul 1961 | A |
2998767 | Vandercook et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3131631 | Haskin, Jr. | May 1964 | A |
3331318 | Augustyn et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3413918 | Gingras | Dec 1968 | A |
3734014 | Oda | May 1973 | A |
3819929 | Newman | Jun 1974 | A |
4015340 | Treleven | Apr 1977 | A |
4015524 | Herbert | Apr 1977 | A |
4019434 | Hoexter | Apr 1977 | A |
4048490 | Troue | Sep 1977 | A |
4072103 | Fletcher et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4216676 | Bugnone | Aug 1980 | A |
4258125 | Edhlund | Mar 1981 | A |
4434562 | Bubley et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4522057 | Kerchiss | Jun 1985 | A |
4558643 | Arima et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4665627 | Wilde et al. | May 1987 | A |
4852486 | Ely et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4984532 | Winters | Jan 1991 | A |
4989513 | Toda et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5099586 | Anderson | Mar 1992 | A |
5159602 | Giordano et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5289769 | Lewis | Mar 1994 | A |
5485782 | Van Der Horst | Jan 1996 | A |
5495800 | Weissbein et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5615611 | Puschnerat | Apr 1997 | A |
5754208 | Szlucha | May 1998 | A |
5856064 | Chou | Jan 1999 | A |
6035547 | Hess et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058770 | Engel | May 2000 | A |
6378426 | Furr, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6422143 | Lawrence et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6814001 | Westby et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050243154 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60312595 | Aug 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10976194 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11125816 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10219018 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10976194 | US |