Inkjet printers face potential safety and other issues due to ink shorts. Some types of ink shorts may result in damage to a print head or cause overheating that can impact print quality
Detailed description of embodiments of the present disclosure will be made with reference to the accompanying drawings:
The following is a detailed description for carrying out embodiments of the present disclosure. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the example embodiments of the present disclosure.
Various embodiments involve analyzing the image from a density perspective before printing it. In an example embodiment, the outcome of this analysis is a density profile, an estimate based on the content of the image to be printed (not on the current consumption of previously printed images).
As noted above, some types of ink shorts may result in damage to a print head or cause overheating that can impact print quality. For example, in some applications, aerosol sprayed around the print head(s) is deposited over its electrical contacts. Ink dendrites are formed around the nozzles, and can eventually short two signals and damage the print head or the printer electronics. However, a semi-permanent or a non low-resistance short presents different challenges, mainly, a temperature rise due to the extra current flow.
Embodiments described herein allow for early detection of low resistance ink shorts and provides the ability to detect non-low resistance ink shorts while printing. In an example embodiment, this is achieved using a current model of the print head and an image density analysis before printing the image to predict the current consumption profile.
An example embodiment allows for programming a current threshold closer to the real limit and not to a limit determined using the highest expected current draw for the print head in its application, sometimes referred to as a worst case limit. With this technique, dead ink shorts can be detected sooner thus lessening the likelihood of damaging the print head.
In another embodiment, by recording the current drawn by each image and comparing this to the prediction it is possible to detect semi-permanent and non-low resistance ink shorts while printing. If the real profile is greater than the predicted profile, but not high enough to reach the programmed threshold, then a non-low resistance or semi-permanent ink short is probably the cause. This comparison can be performed in real time without having the printer stop the printing, or after the image has been printed.
In an example embodiment, a method includes obtaining a density profile of an image (e.g., before printing the image), and using the density profile to detect an ink short (e.g., a low resistance ink short, or a non-low resistance ink short) in a print head (e.g., while printing the image). In an example embodiment, the method includes using a current model of the print head and the density profile to estimate a greatest current expected from printing the image, using the greatest current expected to determine a current consumption threshold, and indicating a print head error condition if an actual print head current measured during printing the image exceeds the current consumption threshold. In an example embodiment, the method includes removing power from the print head if the print head error condition exists. In an example embodiment, the method includes using a current model of the print head and the density profile to estimate a current consumption profile that would result from printing the image, and indicating a printing anomaly if an actual print head current measured during printing the image is not sufficiently close to the current consumption profile. In an example embodiment, the method includes servicing the print head if the printing anomaly exists. In an example embodiment, the current model includes an electrical resistance and/or a temperature of a component of the print head. In an example embodiment, the method includes processing image data and a current model of the print head to estimate a greatest current to be used by the print head to print an image using the image data, and comparing an actual print head current measured during printing the image with the greatest current to determine if a print head error condition exists. In an example embodiment, the method includes using the greatest current to determine a current consumption threshold, and removing power from the print head if the actual print head current exceeds the current consumption threshold.
In this example embodiment, the print carriage 140 supports first and second removable inkjet print head cartridges 150, 152 (each of which is sometimes called a “pen,” “print cartridge,” or “cartridge”). The print cartridges 150, 152 include respective print heads 154, 156 that respectively have generally downwardly facing nozzles for ejecting ink generally downwardly onto a portion of the print media that is in the print zone 125. By way of example, the print cartridge 150 is a monochrome printing cartridge while the print cartridge 152 is a tri-color printing cartridge.
In this example embodiment, the print carriage 140 is driven along the slider rod 138 by an endless belt 158 which can be driven by a drive gear, and a linear encoder strip 159 is utilized to detect position of the print carriage 140 along the carriage scan axis.
An example application for the principles disclosed herein is that of inkjet printing. Inkjet printers operate by expelling a small volume of ink through a plurality of small nozzles or orifices in a surface held in proximity to a medium upon which marks or printing is to be placed. These nozzles are arranged in a fashion in the surface such that the expulsion of a droplet of ink from a determined number of nozzles relative to a particular position of the medium results in the production of a portion of a desired character or image. Controlled repositioning of the substrate or the medium and another expulsion of ink droplets continues the production of more pixels of the desired character or image. Inks of selected colors may be coupled to individual arrangements of nozzles so that selected firing of the orifices can produce a multicolored image by the inkjet printer.
Expulsion of the ink droplet in a thermal inkjet printer is a result of rapid thermal heating of the ink to a temperature which exceeds the boiling point of the ink solvent and creates a vapor phase bubble of ink. Rapid heating of the ink can be achieved by passing a pulse of electric current through a resistor, typically for 0.5 to 5 microseconds. Each nozzle may be coupled to a small ink firing chamber filled with ink and having the individually addressable heating element resistor thermally coupled to the ink. As the bubble nucleates and expands, it displaces a volume of ink which is forced out of the nozzle and deposited on the medium. The bubble then collapses and the displaced volume of ink is replenished from a larger ink reservoir by way of ink feed channels. After the deactivation of the heater resistor and the expulsion of ink from the firing chamber, ink flows back into the firing chamber to fill the volume vacated by the ink which was expelled.
The principles described herein are applicable to a wide variety of image forming devices including but not limited to inkjet products, industrial printers, and large-format printers. Referring to
With respect to current consumption profiles,
The energy used to print an image depends largely on the image density and so does the current consumption. A full blackout image can consume much more current than a semi-permanent ink short. Even a small dark area can produce a short peak in current consumption higher than a semi-permanent ink short.
In various embodiments, an algorithm is used to predict the maximum print head current while printing an image based on the image content, and a current limit that is lower than the current drawn by a blackout image is programmed. This lower current limit results in earlier detection of a low resistance short than if the blackout image current level were used. By closed loop monitoring the real (actual) current consumption, incipient ink shorts can be detected by comparing the recorded and the predicted values without stopping printing.
Using a current model of the print head, an estimation of the current drawn while printing the image can be calculated and therefore the greatest expected current for that specific image is determined. With that value having been determined, an appropriate current threshold can be calculated and programmed for that particular image. If the image is not a blackout, that limit will be lower and thus the system will detect a low resistance ink short faster, especially for lighter images. The current information can be used at desired points in time to reprogram the threshold as the image is being printed (e.g., in real time synchronized with the printing).
If the current drawn by each image is recorded and compared to the prediction, semi-permanent and non-low resistance ink shorts can be detected while printing. More specifically, if it has been determined (from the prediction) how much current is to be used at every point of the image, any deviation from the prediction (e.g., an increment in ink consumption) is a potential failure. The comparison can be performed in real time or after the image has been printed; however, the printer does not have to stop in order to perform this comparison. For repetitive jobs (e.g., copies) the density profile analysis can be skipped after the first copy.
In an example embodiment, a printing apparatus includes a mechanism for estimating a current consumption profile that would result from printing an image, and an image producing device configured to print the image and to compare a print head current measured while printing the image to the current consumption profile to determine whether an overcurrent condition exists. In an example embodiment, the mechanism for estimating includes a mechanism for performing an image density analysis on the image. In an example embodiment, the mechanism for estimating includes a mechanism for modeling current use by the print head. In an example embodiment, the overcurrent condition indicates a print head error condition (e.g., caused by a dead ink short). In an example embodiment, the overcurrent condition indicates a printing anomaly (e.g., caused by a non-low resistance ink short).
In an example embodiment, a printing system includes a print head, a controller for providing signals to the print head to print an image, and an overcurrent detection device configured to analyze image content of the image to estimate a current consumption profile that would result from printing the image and to compare a print head current measured while printing the image with the current consumption profile to determine if an overcurrent condition occurred. In an example embodiment, the overcurrent detection device is configured to also use a current model of the print head to estimate the current consumption profile. In an example embodiment, the current model includes an electrical resistance and/or a temperature of a component of the print head. In an example embodiment, the overcurrent condition indicates a print head error condition (e.g., caused by a low resistance ink short). In an example embodiment, the overcurrent condition indicates a printing anomaly (e.g., caused by a non-low resistance ink short).
In an example embodiment, an image processing apparatus includes a storage device upon which is stored a computer-executable program which when executed by a processor enables the processor to analyze image content of an image to estimate a current consumption profile that would result from printing the image and to compare a print head current measurement taken during printing the image with the current consumption profile to determine if an overcurrent condition occurred. In an example embodiment, the computer-executable program also uses a current model of the print head to estimate the current consumption profile. In an example embodiment, the current model includes an electrical resistance and/or a temperature of a component of the print head. In an example embodiment, the overcurrent condition indicates a print head error condition (e.g., caused by a low resistance ink short). In an example embodiment, the overcurrent condition indicates a printing anomaly (e.g., caused by a non-low resistance ink short).
If it is determined at 514 that the actual current consumption is not greater than the print head shut down threshold, then at 522 the actual current consumption is recorded. If it is next determined at 524 that the end of the image has not yet been reached (i.e., a portion of the image still has yet to be printed), the process loops back to 514 where the comparison is again performed. If at 524 it is determined that the end of the image has been reached, then at 526 the recorded current profile is compared with the calculated current profile. If at 528 any anomalies are detected, at 530 preventive servicing is performed to open the non-low resistance or semi-permanent ink short detected before returning to 502. If no anomalies are detected at 528, the process then returns to 502 to receive data for the next image.
In an example embodiment, an image processing method includes processing image data and a current model of a print head to estimate a greatest current expected to be drawn by the print head to print an image using the image data, and comparing an actual print head current measured during printing the image with the greatest current expected to by drawn by the print head to determine if a print head error condition exists. In an example embodiment, the current model includes an electrical resistance and/or a temperature of a component of the print head. In an example embodiment, the image processing method further includes removing power from the print head if the print head error condition exists. In an example embodiment, the image processing method further includes removing power from the print head if the print head error condition indicates a low resistance ink short. In an example embodiment, the image processing method further includes using the greatest current expected to determine a current consumption threshold, and removing power from the print head if the actual print head current exceeds the current consumption threshold.
In an example embodiment, an image processing method includes processing image data and a current model of a print head to estimate a current consumption profile that would result from printing an image using the image data, and comparing an actual print head current measured during printing the image with the current consumption profile to determine if a printing anomaly occurred. In an example embodiment, the current model includes an electrical resistance and/or a temperature of a component of the print head. In an example embodiment, the image processing method further includes servicing the print head if the printing anomaly exists. In an example embodiment, the image processing method further includes servicing the print head if the printing anomaly indicates a non-low resistance or semi-permanent ink short.
Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in terms of the example embodiments above, numerous modifications and/or additions to the above-described embodiments would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art. It is intended that the scope of the claimed subject matter extends to all such modifications and/or additions.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4119973 | Stager | Oct 1978 | A |
4196625 | Kern | Apr 1980 | A |
4616234 | Wint | Oct 1986 | A |
5162817 | Tajika et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5623290 | Iida et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5988783 | Tajika et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6378979 | Anderson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6578940 | Rehmann et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6631962 | Rehmann et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652056 | Shioya | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7287822 | Espasa et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7300128 | Espasa et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303249 | Nicodem | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7396511 | Fujii et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20030025740 | Rehmann et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030222934 | Choi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040017443 | Ikeda et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021712 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046812 | Lapstun et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040183848 | Hasseler | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060203027 | Espasa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
59-221168 | Dec 1984 | JP |
62160242 | Jul 1987 | JP |
62-214964 | Sep 1987 | JP |
07-154555 | Jun 1995 | JP |
07154555 | Jun 1995 | JP |
2003-341088 | Mar 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070046712 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |