Patent Application
20090109260
The present invention relates to the field of inkjet printheads manufactured using micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) techniques.
The following application has been filed by the Applicant simultaneously with the present application:
Various methods, systems and apparatus relating to the present invention are disclosed in the following US patents/patent applications filed by the applicant or assignee of the present invention:
The disclosures of these applications and patents are incorporated herein by reference.
Many different types of printing have been invented, a large number of which are presently in use. The known forms of print have a variety of methods for marking the print media with a relevant marking media. Commonly used forms of printing include offset printing, laser printing and copying devices, dot matrix type impact printers, thermal paper printers, film recorders, thermal wax printers, dye sublimation printers and ink jet printers both of the drop on demand and continuous flow type. Each type of printer has its own advantages and problems when considering cost, speed, quality, reliability, simplicity of construction and operation etc.
In recent years, the field of ink jet printing, wherein each individual pixel of ink is derived from one or more ink nozzles has become increasingly popular primarily due to its inexpensive and versatile nature.
Many different techniques on ink jet printing have been invented. For a survey of the field, reference is made to an article by J Moore, “Non-Impact Printing: Introduction and Historical Perspective”, Output Hard Copy Devices, Editors R Dubeck and S Sherr, pages 207-220 (1988).
Ink Jet printers themselves come in many different types. The utilization of a continuous stream of ink in ink jet printing appears to date back to at least 1929 wherein U.S. Pat. No. 1,941,001 by Hansell discloses a simple form of continuous stream electro-static ink jet printing.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,596,275 (Sweet et al) also discloses a process of a continuous ink jet printing including the step wherein the ink jet stream is modulated by a high frequency electro-static field so as to cause drop separation. This technique is still utilized by several manufacturers including Elmjet and Scitex (see also U.S. Pat. No. 3,373,437 (Sweet et al)
Piezoelectric ink jet printers are also one form of commonly utilized ink jet printing device. Piezoelectric systems are disclosed by Kyser et. al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,946,398 which utilizes a diaphragm mode of operation, by Zolten in U.S. Pat. No. 3,683,212 which discloses a squeeze mode of operation of a piezoelectric crystal, Stemme in U.S. Pat. No. 3,747,120 discloses a bend mode of piezoelectric operation, Howkins in U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,601 discloses a piezoelectric push mode actuation of the ink jet stream and Fischbeck in U.S. Pat. No. 4,584,590 which discloses a shear mode type of piezoelectric transducer element.
More recently, thermal ink jet printing has become an extremely popular form of ink jet printing. The inkjet printing techniques include those disclosed by Endo et al in GB 2007162 and Vaught et al in U.S. Pat. No. 4,490,728. Both the aforementioned references disclosed ink jet printing techniques that rely upon the activation of an electrothermal actuator which results in the creation of a bubble in a constricted space, such as a nozzle, which thereby causes the ejection of ink from an aperture connected to the confined space onto a relevant print media. Printing devices utilizing the electro-thermal actuator are manufactured by manufacturers such as Canon and Hewlett Packard.
As can be seen from the foregoing, many different types of printing technologies are available. Ideally, a printing technology should have a number of desirable attributes. These include inexpensive construction and operation, high speed operation, safe and continuous long term operation etc. Each technology may have its own advantages and disadvantages in the areas of cost, speed, quality, reliability, power usage, simplicity of construction operation, durability and consumables.
Many inkjet printheads are constructed utilizing micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) techniques. As such, they tend to rely upon standard integrated circuit construction/fabrication techniques of depositing planar layers on a silicon wafer and etching certain portions of the planar layers. Within silicon circuit fabrication technology, certain techniques are better known than others. For example, the techniques associated with the creation of CMOS circuits are likely to be more readily used than those associated with the creation of exotic circuits including ferroelectrics, gallium arsenide etc. Hence, it is desirable, in any MEMS constructions, to utilize well proven semi-conductor fabrication techniques which do not require any “exotic” processes or materials. Of course, a certain degree of trade off will be undertaken in that if the advantages of using the exotic material far out weighs its disadvantages then it may become desirable to utilize the material anyway. However, if it is possible to achieve the same, or similar, properties using more common materials, the problems of exotic materials can be avoided.
An important aspect of any inkjet printer is printhead maintenance. Printhead maintenance increases the lifetime of a printhead and enables the printhead to be used after idle periods. Typical aims of printhead maintenance are the removal of particulates from the printhead, removing ink flooded onto the printhead face, and unblocking of nozzles which may become blocked with ink (‘decap’) or particulates. Hitherto, a variety of techniques have been used for printhead maintenance, such as suction cappers and squeegee-type wipers.
However, the usual problems of printhead maintenance are exacerbated in the Applicant's pagewidth printheads, which have high-density nozzles constructed on a silicon wafer using MEMS techniques. Whilst these printheads are very inexpensive to manufacture, they are typically less robust than other inkjet printheads and, hence, have hitherto required special consideration of printhead maintenance. Accordingly, the Applicant has proposed a number of novel techniques for printhead maintenance, including non-contact maintenance techniques. Some of these maintenance techniques are exemplified in U.S. application Ser. Nos. 11/246,688 (filed Oct. 11, 2005); 11/246,707 (filed Oct. 11, 2005); 11/246,693 (filed Oct. 11, 2005); 11/482,958 (filed Jul. 10, 2006); and 11/495,815 (filed Jul. 31, 2006), the contents of each of which are herein incorporated by reference.
It would be desirable to provide a MEMS pagewidth printhead, which is amenable to a plethora of printhead maintenance techniques, including contact maintenance techniques. It would be further desirable to provide a MEMS printhead having superior mechanical robustness. It would be further desirable to provide a MEMS printhead, which traps a minimal number of particulates and hence facilitates printhead maintenance.
In a first aspect, there is provided an inkjet printhead comprising a reinforced bi-layered nozzle plate structure spanning across a plurality of nozzles.
Optionally, each nozzle comprises a nozzle chamber having a roof, each roof being defined by part of said nozzle plate structure.
Optionally, the nozzle chambers are formed on a substrate.
Optionally, each nozzle chamber comprises said roof spaced apart from said substrate, and sidewalls extending between said roof and said substrate.
Optionally, each roof has a nozzle aperture defined therein.
Optionally, the nozzle plate structure comprises:
Optionally, the second nozzle plate defines a planar, exterior surface of said printhead.
Optionally, the first and second nozzle plates are comprised of the same or different materials.
Optionally, the materials are ceramic materials depositable by PECVD.
Optionally, the materials are independently selected from the group comprising: silicon nitride, silicon oxide and silicon oxynitride.
Optionally, each nozzle comprises a nozzle chamber formed on a substrate, said nozzle chamber comprising a roof spaced apart from said substrate and sidewalls extending between said roof and said substrate, wherein said first nozzle plate and said sidewalls are comprised of the same material.
In a second aspect, there is provided an inkjet printhead integrated circuit comprising:
In a third aspect, there is provided a method of fabricating an inkjet printhead having a planar nozzle plate, the method comprising the steps of:
Optionally, the second material is deposited by PECVD.
Optionally, the first material is deposited by PECVD onto a non-planar sacrificial scaffold to form said first nozzle plate.
Optionally, the first and second materials are the same or different from each other.
Optionally, the first and second materials are independently selected from the group comprising: silicon nitride, silicon oxide and silicon oxynitride.
Optionally, the filler is photoresist.
Optionally, step (b) is performed by the sub-steps of:
Optionally, the method further comprises the step of:
Optionally, step (b)(ii) is performed by chemical mechanical planarization or by photoresist etching.
Optionally, the method further comprises the step of:
Optionally, each nozzle comprises a nozzle chamber formed on a substrate, said nozzle chamber comprising a roof spaced apart from said substrate and sidewalls extending between said roof and said substrate, wherein said first nozzle plate and said sidewalls are comprised of the same material.
The printhead according to the invention comprises a plurality of nozzles, and typically a chamber and actuator (e.g. heater element) corresponding to each nozzle. The smallest repeating units of the printhead will generally have an ink supply inlet feeding ink to one or more chambers. An entire nozzle array is formed by repeating these individual units. Such an individual unit is generally referred to herein as a “unit cell”. A printhead may be comprised of a plurality of printhead integrated circuits, each printhead integrated circuit comprising a plurality of nozzles.
As used herein, the term “ink” is used to signify any ejectable liquid, and is not limited to conventional inks containing colored dyes. Examples of non-colored inks include fixatives, infra-red absorber inks, functionalized chemicals, adhesives, biological fluids, medicaments, water and other solvents, and so on. The ink or ejectable liquid also need not necessarily be a strictly a liquid, and may contain a suspension of solid particles.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring initially to
Depending on the particular nozzle design and manufacturing process, the cavities 102 may be substantially larger (wider, longer or deeper) than is illustrated in
The discontinuity or non-planarity arising from the cavities 102 in the nozzle plate 101 is disadvantageous for several reasons. Firstly, the cavities 102 are points of weakness in the nozzle plate 101 and reduce the overall mechanical robustness of the printhead, particularly with respect to sheer forces imparted across the nozzle plate. This is especially significant, because wiping actions across the surface of the nozzle plate 101 (as may be used during some types of printhead maintenance) cause relatively high sheer forces. Secondly, the cavities 102 can easily trap ink and/or particulates, which are then difficult to remove. The proximity of the cavities 102 to the nozzle apertures 26 is especially undesirable, because any trapped particulates are more likely to obscure nozzles and affect print quality.
For a complete understanding of the present invention, there now follows a description of how the printhead integrated circuit shown in
The MEMS manufacturing process builds up nozzle structures on a silicon wafer after the completion of CMOS processing.
During CMOS processing of the wafer, four metal layers are deposited onto a silicon wafer 2, with the metal layers being interspersed between interlayer dielectric (ILD) layers. The four metal layers are referred to as M1, M2, M3 and M4 layers and are built up sequentially on the wafer during CMOS processing. These CMOS layers provide all the drive circuitry and logic for operating the printhead.
In the completed printhead, each heater element actuator is connected to the CMOS via a pair of electrodes defined in the outermost M4 layer. Hence, the M4 CMOS layer is the foundation for subsequent MEMS processing of the wafer. The M4 layer also defines bonding pads along a longitudinal edge of each printhead integrated circuit. These bonding pads (not shown) allow the CMOS to be connected to a microprocessor via wire bonds extending from the bonding pads.
Before MEMS processing of the unit cell 1 begins, bonding pads along a longitudinal edge of each printhead integrated circuit are defined by etching through the passivation layer 4. This etch reveals the M4 layer 3 at the bonding pad positions. The nozzle unit cell 1 is completely masked with photoresist for this step and, hence, is unaffected by the etch.
Turning to
In the next step (
Typically, when filling trenches with photoresist, it is necessary to expose the photoresist outside the perimeter of the trench in order to ensure that photoresist fills against the walls of the trench and, therefore, avoid ‘stringers’ in subsequent deposition steps. However, this technique results in a raised (or spiked) rim of photoresist around the perimeter of the trench. This is undesirable because in a subsequent deposition step, material is deposited unevenly onto the raised rim—vertical or angled surfaces on the rim will receive less deposited material than the horizontal planar surface of the photoresist filling the trench. The result is ‘resistance hotspots’ in regions where material is thinly deposited.
As shown in
After exposure of the SAC1 photoresist 10, the photoresist is reflowed by heating. Reflowing the photoresist allows it to flow to the walls of the pit 8, filling it exactly.
Referring to
This etch is defined by a layer of photoresist (not shown) exposed using the dark tone mask shown in
In the next sequence of steps, an ink inlet for the nozzle is etched through the passivation layer 4, the oxide layer 5 and the silicon wafer 2. During CMOS processing, each of the metal layers had an ink inlet opening (see, for example, opening 6 in the M4 layer 3 in
Referring to
In the first etch step (
In the second etch step (
In the next step, the ink inlet 15 is plugged with photoresist and a second sacrificial layer (“SAC2”) of photoresist 16 is built up on top of the SAC1 photoresist 10 and passivation layer 4. The SAC2 photoresist 16 will serve as a scaffold for subsequent deposition of roof material, which forms a roof and sidewalls for each nozzle chamber. Referring to
As shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
With all the MEMS nozzle features now fully formed, subsequent stages define ink supply channels 27 by backside DRIE, remove all sacrificial photoresist (including the SAC1 and SAC2 photoresist layers 10 and 16) by O2 plasma ashing, and thin the wafer to about 135 microns by backside etching.
One of the advantages of the MEMS manufacturing process described above is that the nozzle plate 101 is deposited by PECVD. This means that the nozzle plate fabrication can be incorporated into a MEMS fabrication process which uses standard CMOS deposition/etch techniques. Thus, the overall manufacturing cost of the printhead can be kept low. By contrast, many prior art printheads have laminated nozzle plates, which are not only susceptible to delamination, but also require a separate lamination step that cannot be performed by standard CMOS processing. Ultimately, this adds to the cost of such printheads.
However, PECVD deposition of the nozzle plate 101 has its own challenges. It is fundamentally important to deposit a sufficient thickness of roof material (e.g. silicon nitride) so that the nozzle plate is not overly brittle. Deposition is not problematic when depositing onto planar structures; however, as will be appreciated from
Referring now to
The next stage deposits additional roof material (e.g. 1 micron thick layer) by PECVD onto the planar structure shown in
This reinforced bi-layered roof structure is mechanically very robust compared to the single roof structure shown in
The first and second roofs 21A and 21B may be comprised of the same or different materials. Typically, the first and second roofs are comprised of materials independently selected from the group comprising: silicon nitride, silicon oxide and silicon oxynitride. In one embodiment, the first roof 21A is comprised of silicon nitride and the second roof is comprised of silicon oxide.
Following on from the unit cell shown in
The resultant printhead integrated circuit, having a planar, bi-layered reinforced nozzle plate, is shown in
It will, of course, be appreciated that the present invention has been described purely by way of example and that modifications of detail may be made within the scope of the invention, which is defined by the accompanying claims.
