Inkjet printing method and device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6450604
  • Patent Number
    6,450,604
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 6, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 17, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
An ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing. Upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle, an injection timing of the ink drop is changed corresponding to a drive frequency of the drive voltages using a predetermined rule. The predetermined rule may be a table defined in terms of drive frequencies of the drive voltages and optimum injection timings of the ink drop corresponding to the drive frequencies.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to an inkjet printing method and device and, in particular, to an on-demand inkjet printing method and device for printing characters and/or images for use in a printer, a plotter, a facsimile device, a copying machine or the like.




2. Description of the Related Art




Printing devices such as printers are essential in the recent office automation environment, and even personal use printing devices have been widely spreading. Among them, with respect to the printers attention has been more paid to inkjet printers as compared with wire printers which perform printing by magnetically driving wires to press them onto a platen via an ink ribbon and print medium such as a print sheet of paper. As appreciated as compared with the wire printer, the inkjet printer produces less noise and carries out high speed printing with less printing cost per sheet.




In the inkjet printing, ink drops of different volumes or sizes are injected for forming dots if different sizes on a print medium so as to realize a halftone printing. In this case, the ink drops are jetted successively at constant periods (T|sec|).




Normally, the multi pass printing is carried out wherein ink drops of the same site are successively jetted on one line, then ink drops of another same size are successively jetted on the same line, which are repeated to jet the ink drops of various sizes without changing the line.




In the foregoing halftone printing, however, there has been a serious problem that a disorder or an output image is caused due to the fact that dots are not formed at predetermined positions on the print medium even with the normal injection timings.




Although such a disorder of the output image is prevented in the multi pass printing, there is a drawback that the printing speed is lowered.




There has also been a problem that when drive period of voltages applied to a piezoelectric element is changed, dot dislocation on a print medium occurs to lower the printing quality.




There has also been a problem at in some cases, an extra ink drop is injected to lower the printing quality.




There has also been a problem that as a time for which no ink drop is injected via a nozzle is prolonged, a hit position of on ink drop and a dot size on a print medium can not be correctly controlled.




The present inventors tried to seek reasons why the disorder of the output image is caused and found out one of the reasons that the ink drops hit upon the print medium at positions other than the predetermined positions due to differences in size of the ink drops. Specifically, when the ink drops of different sizes are injected, the fling speed increases as the volume or mass of the ink drop increases. As speed differences among the ink drops increase, the accuracy of the hit positions of the ink drops on the print medium is lowered to degrade the quality of the output image.




Another reason is also found out that since meniscus vibration after an injection of an ink drop can not be suppressed, an extra ink drop (hereinafter referred to as a “satellite drop”) is injected to degrade the quality of the output image.




Another reason is also found out that as a time for which no ink drop is injected via a nozzle is prolonged, water contained in ink near a nozzle opening is gradually vaporized so that the mixing ratio of ink components as well as materiality values (viscosity, density, surface tension, etc.) are changed. Thus, for example, when the viscosity is increased, an injection ink amount is reduced to diminish a dot size on the print medium or lower an ink drop speed (average speed while ink flies as an ink drop). As a result, the hit position of the ink drop on the print medium can not be correctly controlled.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved inkjet printing method that can eliminate one or more of the disadvantages inherent in the prior art.




It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved inkjet printing device that can eliminate one or more of the disadvantages inherent in the prior art.




According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided an inkjet printing method wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing method comprising: changing, upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle, an injection timing of the ink drop corresponding to a drive frequency of the drive voltages using a predetermined rule which is prestored.




It may be arranged that the prestored predetermined rule comprises a table defined in terms of drive frequencies of the drive voltages and optimum injection timings of the ink drop corresponding to the drive frequencies.




According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an inkjet printing method wherein all ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber of an inkjet head filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print, medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing method comprising: controlling the inkjet head upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle such that T


3


≦Tc or (T


2


·T


3


)≦Tc, wherein T


2


represents a time for rapidly contracting the pressure chamber after T


1


representing a time for expanding the pressure chamber, T


3


represents a time for holding the contracted state of the pressure chamber or further contracting the pressure chamber gradually, T


4


represents a time for restoring the pressure chamber to an initial state, and Tc represents a period given by 1/Helmholz resonance frequency of the pressure chamber.




According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided on inkjet printing method wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber filled with ink, so that the injected ink drip hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing method comprising: determining a waveform of the drive voltages corresponding to a flying interval of the ink drop using a predetermined rule which is prestored, the flying interval being defined as a time from an injection of an ink drop to an injection of a subsequent ink drop.




It may be arranged that the waveform of the drive voltages includes two continuous rising portions following a descend portion and having different inclinations, and wave heights of the two rising portions are defined in the prestored predetermined rule.




It may be arranged that the prestored predetermined rule comprises a table defined in terms or flying intervals of ink drops to be injected via the nozzle and optimum waveforms of drive voltages corresponding to the flying intervals.




According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided an inkjet printing device wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied lo a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing device characterized by: changing, upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle, an injection timing of the ink drop corresponding to a drive frequency of the drive voltages using a predetermined rule which is prestored.




It may be arranged that the prestored predetermined rule comprises a table defined in terms of drive frequencies of the drive voltages and optimum injection timings of the ink drop corresponding to the drive frequencies.




According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided an inkjet printing device wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber of an inkjet head filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing device characterized by: controlling the inkjet head upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle such that T


3


≦Tc or (T


2


+T


3


)≦Tc, wherein T


2


represents a time for rapidly contracting the pressure chamber after T


1


representing a time for expanding the pressure chamber, T


3


represents a time for holding the contracted state of the pressure chamber of further contracting the pressure chamber to an initial state, and Tc represents a period given by 1/Helmholtz resonance frequency of the pressure chamber.




According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, there is provided an inkjet printing device wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing device characterized by: determining a waveform of the drive voltages corresponding to a flying interval of the ink drop using a predetermined rule which is prestored, the flying interval being defined as a time from an injection of an ink drop to an injection of a subsequent ink drop.




It may be arranged that the waveform of the drive voltages includes two continuous rising portions following a descending portion and having different inclinations, and wave heights of the two rising portions are defined in the prestored predetermined rule.




It may he arranged that the prestored predetermined rule comprises a table defined in terms of flying intervals of ink drops to be injected via The nozzle and optimum waveforms of drive voltages corresponding to the flying intervals.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention will be understood more fully from the detailed description given hereinbelow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.




In the drawings:





FIG. 1

is a block diagram showing a structure of a drive control circuit of an inkjet printing device according to a first preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a sectional view showing a structure of one of inkjet heads of the inkjet printing device according to the first preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a diagram of the form of sectional views of a nozzle for explaining behavior of a meniscus of ink when an ink drop is injected using the inkjet printing device according to the first preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 4

is time chart, showing a positional variation of the meniscus in the inkjet printing device according to the first preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a diagram for explaining a relationship between a time chart of drive waveforms fed to a piezoelectric element for injecting ink drops, and corresponding hit positions of the ink drops on a print medium, wherein (a) shows the drive waveforms when middle ink drops are injected per drive period RT and the resultant dots on the print medium, (b) shows the waveforms when middle, small and big ink drops are injected per drive period KT, and the resultant dots on the print medium, which corresponds to the prior art, and (c) shows the waveforms the middle, small and big ink drops are injected according to the first preferred embodiment of the present invention, and the resultant dots on the print medium;





FIG. 6

is a diagram showing two examples of drive waveforms corresponding to different drive periods of an inkjet head of an inkjet printing device according to a second preferred embodiment of the present invention wherein shows a drive waveform where a drive frequency is 18 kHz, and (b) shows a drive waveform where a drive frequency is 9 kHz;





FIG. 7

is a diagram, wherein (a) and (b) are a graph and a table, respectively showing a relationship between drive frequencies of an inkjet head of the inkjet printing device and ink drop speeds according to the second preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 8

is a diagram showing waveforms of drive voltages applied to piezoelectric element of an inkjet printing device according to a third preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 9

is a waveform diagram showing a relationship between a meniscus displacement and a drive voltage applying time in the inkjet printing device according to the third preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 10

is a block diagram showing the whole structure of a drive control circuit of an inkjet printing device according to a fourth preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 11

is a sectional view showing a structure of one of inkjet heads of the inkjet printing device At a portion around a nozzle opening;





FIG. 12

is a diagram for explaining a variation in speed of inkjet drops via a nozzle opening of one of the inkjet heads of the inkjet printing device;





FIG. 13

is a diagram showing a relationship between ink drop flying intervals (Trg.) and ink drop hit positions on a print medium according to the prior art, and further showing a relationship between ink drop flying intervals (Trg.) and ink dot sizes on the print medium according to the prior art;





FIG. 14

is a diagram showing that ink dot positions and ink dot sizes on the print medium can be controlled to fall within respective allowable ranges by changing a waveform of a voltage signal applied to a piezoelectric element of the ink jet printing device corresponding to increment of the ink drop flying interval (Trg.) according to the fourth preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 15

is a diagram showing waveforms of a voltage pulse signal applied to a piezoelectric element of the inkjet printing device according to the fourth preferred embodiment of the present invention, wherein (a) is graph showing a typical waveform of the voltage pulse signal applied to the piezoelectric element, and (b) is a table representing various waveforms of the voltage pulse signal applied to the piezoelectric element in terms of ratios of heights of main portions of the waveform shown at (a) in

FIG. 15

;





FIG. 16

is a diagram for explaining residual vibration of an inkjet head of the inkjet printing device; and





FIG. 17

is a flowchart showing an operation of a CPU of the drive control circuit to select a waveform of a drive voltage signal applied to a piezoelectric element of an inkjet head of the inkjet printing device according to the fourth preferred embodiment of the present invention.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Now, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described hereinbelow with reference to the accompanying drawings.




First Embodiment




In this embodiment, when ink drops of different sizes are injected for forming dots of different sizes on a print medium so as to realize a halftone printing an inkjet printing device ensures the accuracy of hit positions of the ink drops on the print medium, which would be otherwise lowered due to differences in size of the ink drops.





FIG. 1

is a block diagram showing a structure of a drive control circuit of the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, the drive control circuit comprises a controller


10


for performing a control of the whole circuit, a drive waveform feed device including circuits


1




a


,


1




b


,


1




c


for outputting drive waveforms Vout


1


, Vout


2


, Vout


3


, respectively, and a deform device including piezoelectric elements


2




a


,


2




b


, . . . ,


2




n


which deform (expand/contract) depending on the drive waveforms Vout


1


, Vout


2


, Vout


3


applied thereto. The drive control circuit further comprises a switching device


5


including switches


5




a


,


5




b


, . . . ,


5




n


, a shift register


5


A and a latch


5


B for choosing, according to print data fed from the controller


10


, the piezoelectric elements be fed with the drive waveforms. Specifically, according to a driving pattern of the piezoelectric elements


2




a


,


2




b


, . . . ,


2




n


determined by the controller


10


according to the print data, the switching device


5


chooses the necessary piezoelectric elements from among the piezoelectric elements


2




a


,


2




b


, . . . ,


2




n


so that each of the chosen piezoelectric elements receives corresponding one of the drive waveforms Vout


1


, Vout


2


and Vout


3


.




The drive control circuit further comprises a timing adjusting device including delay circuits


4




a


,


4




b


, . . . ,


4




n


for adjusting feed timings of the drive waveforms to the piezoelectric elements


2




a


,


2




b


, . . . ,


2




n


depending on the amplitudes of the applied drive waveforms. The drive waveforms outputted from the delay circuits


4




a


,


4




b


, . . . ,


4




n


are fed to amplifiers


200




a


,


200




b


, . . . ,


200




n


where losses caused by the delay circuits are compensated, and then fed to the piezoelectric elements


2




a


,


2




b


, . . . ,


2




n.







FIG. 2

is a sectional view showing a structure of one of inkjet heads of the ink jet printing device according to this embodiment.




As shown in

FIG. 2

, a space having a nuzzle opening


101


is defined by a piezoelectric element


106


, a pressure chamber plate


108


nozzle plate


102


. The space includes a common ink chamber


105


used by the subject and other inkjet heads, and a pressure chamber


103


dedicated for the subject ink jet head. The common ink chamber


105


acid tine pressure chamber


103


communicate with each other via a feed port


104


so that the ink in the common ink chamber


105


is fed to the pressure chamber


103


via the food port


104


.




When the voltage is applied to the piezoelectric element


106


via a drive control portion


111


the pressure chamber


103


is contracted to inject an ink drop


112


via the nozzle opening


101


toward a print medium. At output from the drive control portion


111


which is fed to the piezoelectric element


106


corresponds to one of outputs from the amplifiers


200




a


,


200




b


, . . . ,


200




n


shown in FIG.


1


.




Referring back to

FIG. 1

, in this embodiment the amplitudes of the drive waveforms are inputted from the drive waveform feed circuits


1




a


,


1




b


,


1




c


into the delay circuits


4




a


,


4




b


, . . . ,


4




n


, so that the feed timings of the drive waveforms to the piezoelectric elements


2




a


,


2




b


, . . . ,


2




n


are adjusted according to the amplitudes of the drive waveforms. Specifically, when injecting an ink drop greater in size than a reference ink drop (in this case, an amplitude of a drive waveform for the subject ink drop is greater than that for the reference ink drop), a delay for the subject ink drop determined by the corresponding delay circuit becomes greater than a reference delay for the reference ink drop, so that the feed timing of the drive waveform for the subject ink drop to the corresponding piezoelectric element is retarded or delayed relative to an injection or drive period of the reference ink drop, that is, as compared with the feed timing of the drive waveform for the reference ink drop. On the other hand, when injecting an ink drop smaller in size than the reference ink drop (in this ease, an amplitude of a drive waveform for the subject ink drop is smaller than that for the reference ink drop), a delay for the subject ink drop determined by the corresponding delay circuit becomes smaller than the reference delay for the reference ink drop, so that the feed timing of the drive waveform for the subject ink drop to the corresponding piezoelectric element is, advanced relative period of the reference ink drop, that is, as compared with the feed timing of the drive waveform for the reference ink drop.





FIG. 3

is diagram in the form of sectional views of a nozzle for explaining behavior of a meniscus of ink when an ink drop is injected using the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment.





FIG. 4

is a time chart showing a positional variation of the meniscus in the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment.




Now, behavior of the meniscus of the ink upon injection of an ink drop using the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment will be explained with reference to

FIGS. 3 and 4

.




{circle around (


1


)} in

FIGS. 3 and 4






The meniscus is at default position.




{circle around (


2


)} in

FIGS. 3 and 4






Voltage of the drive waveform applied to the piezoelectric element is lowered to reduce the pressure in the pressure chamber


3


, so that the meniscus retreats.




{circle around (


3


)} in

FIGS. 3 and 4






Voltage of the drive waveform applied to the piezoelectric element is sharply raised to cause a sudden increase of the pressure in the pressure chamber


3


, so that an ink drop is injected. A changing point H (see

FIG. 5

) where the voltage changes front decreasing to increasing represents an injection turning.




{circle around (


4


)} and {circle around (


5


)} in

FIGS. 3 and 4






The meniscus vibrates due to residual energy.




Assuming that a resolution is represented by x [dpi] and a throughput speed of a printhead is represented by speed [mm/sec], a relation thereof with a drive frequency f [kHz] and a drive period KT (−1/f) |sec| is given by






{25.4 [mm]/


x


[dpi]}/speed[mm/sec]=


KT


(=1/l)[sec]  (1)






Accordingly, a time between injection timings represents a time interval between dots on print medium when reference ink drops are successively injected per drive period KT |sec|. When the number of kinds of ink drops to be jetted is an odd number, the reference ink drop is defined as one of them having the middle size. On the other hand, when the number is an even number, the reference ink drop is defined as one of them which is set to have the same speed difference relative to the minimum and maximum ink drops.




It is assumed that three kinds of ink drops, that is, big, middle and small ink drops, are injected and that the middle ink drop is set to be a reference ink drop. In this case, assuming that initial injection speeds of the big, middle and small ink drops are v


1


, v_def and v


3


|m/s


1


(vl>v def>v


3


), respectively, the big ink drop hits upon the print medium time_


1


|sec| earlier than the middle ink drop, while the small ink drop hits upon the print medium time_


3


[sec] later than the middle ink drop. Thus, hit positions of the big and small ink drops on the print medium are deviated or dislocated correspondingly relative to a hit position of the middle, i.e. reference, ink drop.




The foregoing time_[sec] is given by






time_


1


=


Lx


|(1/v


1


)−(1/v_def)|  (2)






wherein time_


1


represents a hit little difference |sec|, L represents a distance [mm] from a tip of the nozzle to the print medium, and v


1


and v def represent the initial injection speeds [m/s] of the big and middle ink drops respectively.




The foregoing time_


3


[sec] is given by






time









3


−Lx


|(1/v


3


)−(1/v_def)|  (3)






wherein time_


3


represents a hit time difference [sec], L represents the distance |mm| from the tip of the nozzle to the print medium, and v


3


and v_def represent the initial injection speeds [m/s] of the small and middle ink drops, respectively.




Accordingly, when jetting the big ink drop having a flying speed higher than that of the middle ink drop, the injection timing thereof is delayed by time_


1


[sec] relative to the injection timing determined by the drive period KT [sec]. On the other hand, when jetting the small ink drop having a flying speed lower than that of the middle ink drop, the injection timing thereof is advanced by time_


3


[sec] relative to the injection timing determined by the drive period KT [sec]. This cancels an influence caused by difference in speed of the ink drops having different sizes so as to prevent dislocation of the corresponding dots on the print medium.





FIG. 5

shows a relationship between a time chart of the drive waveforms fed to the piezoelectric element and the corresponding hit positions of the ink drops on the print medium when the big, middle and small ink drops are jetted. In

FIG. 5

, (a) shows the waveforms when the middle ink drops are injected per drive period KT, and the resultant dots on the print medium, (b) shows the waveforms when the middle, small and big ink drops are injected per drive period KT, and the resultant dots on the print medium, which corresponds to the prior art, and (c) shows the waveforms when the middle, small and big ink drops are injected according to this embodiment and the resultant dots on the print medium.




As seen from

FIG. 5

, when only the middle ink drops are jetted, since all the time drops have the same size the ink drops precisely hit upon the print medium at given positions. On the other hand, when the three kinds of ink drops, that is, the big, middle and small ink drops, are jetted at the constant drive periods KT as in the prior art, the small ink drop having a lower flying space hits Upon the print medium after time given position, while the big ink drop hits upon the pint medium before the given position. In contrast, according to this embodiment the injection timing of the big ink drop is delayed relative to the injection timing determined by the drive period KT while the injection timing of the small ink drop is advanced relative to the injection timing determined by the drive period KT while the injection timing of the small ink drop is advanced relative to the injection timing determined by the drive period KT, so that all the ink drops hit upon the print medium precisely at the given positions.




Second Embodiment




In this embodiment, when ink drops of a given size are injected for forming dots on a print medium, an inkjet printing device ensures the accuracy of hit positions of the ink drops on the print medium, which would be otherwise lowered due to differences in drive period of drive voltages applied to an inkjet head.




In this embodiment, a structure of a drive control circuit of the inkjet printing device is the same as that of the first preferred embodiment shown in FIG.


1


.




Similarly, in this embodiment, a structure of each of inkjet heads of the inkjet printing device is the same as that of the first preferred embodiment shown in FIG.


2


.




On the other hand, the controller


10


in this embodiment executes a control which is independent of the first preferred embodiment and later-described third and fourth preferred embodiments of the present invention, but may also be executed in those other preferred embodiments.





FIG. 6

shows two examples of drive waveforms corresponding to different drive periods of an inkjet head of the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment.




In general, it is necessary to frequently change a drive period of drive voltages required for driving an inkjet bead even during printing one character. This change in drive period is required in response to a change in the form of a character to he printed and in dot position on a print medium, and thus can not be avoided.




In

FIG. 6

, (a) shows as Waveform


1


a drive waveform where a drive frequency is 18 kHz and (b) shows as Waveform


2


a drive waveform where a drive frequency is 9 kHz.




When comparing Waveform


1


and Waveform


2


both are equal to each other as a waveform itself but differ from each other in that Waveform


2


advances in phase by 21 μs relative to Waveform


1


. Specifically, a time point of applying the drive voltages for generating Waveform is earlier than that for Waveform


1


by 21 μs. However, these voltage applying time points are both correct voltage applying time points corresponding to the drive periods of Waveforms


1


and


2


.




In

FIG. 7

, (a) and (b) are a graph and a table, respectively, showing a relationship between drive frequencies (periods) of an inkjet head of the inkjet printing device and ink drop speeds according to this embodiment.




In this is embodiment, in consideration of the relationship between the drive periods of an inkjet head and the ink drop speeds as shown in

FIG. 7

, the controller


10


controls the output timings of the circuits


1




a


,


1




b


,


1




c


(drive waveform feed device) so that ink drops corresponding to the respective drive periods hit upon the print, medium at correct positions, i.e. without causing dislocation of dots on the print medium.




As seen from (a) in

FIG. 7

, the relationship between the drive frequencies and the ink drop speeds is not a simple proportional relationship. However, for example, the table shown at (b) in

FIG. 7

, which is prepared in terms of the drive frequencies and the corresponding ink drop speeds, may be prestored in the controller


10


so that the controller


10


can achieve a control or feeding the optimum injection timings to the respective inkjet heads based on the complicated relationship between the drive frequencies and the corresponding ink drop speeds as shown at (a) in FIG.


7


.




It may also be possible that a table, which is prepared more directly in terms of the drive frequencies and the corresponding optimum injection timings, may he prestored it the controller


10


, other than the foregoing table as shown at (b) in FIG.


7


.




Third Embodiment




In this embodiment, during a process of injecting an ink drop of a given size, an inkjet printing device prevents living of a satellite drop which would be otherwise caused by meniscus vibration after an injection of the ink drop.





FIG. 8

is a diagram showing waveforms of drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element of the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment.




In this embodiment, a structure of a drive control circuit of the inkier printing device is the same as that of the first preferred embodiment shown in FIG.


1


.




Similarly, in this embodiment, a structure of each of inkjet heads of the inkjet printing device is the same as that of the first preferred embodiment shown in FIG.


2


.




On the other hand, the controller


10


in this embodiment executes a control which is independent of the first and second preferred embodiments and the later-described fourth preferred embodiment of the present invention, but may also be executed in those other preferred embodiments.




In

FIG. 8

, T


1


, T


2


, T


3


, T


4


and Tc are defined as follows:




T


1


: time for expanding the pressure chamber


103


;




T


2


: time for rapidly contracting the pressure chamber


103


;




T


3


: time for holding the contracted state of the pressure chamber


103


or further contracting the pressure chamber


103


gradually;




T


4


: time for restoring the pressure chamber


103


to the initial state; and




Tc: period given by 1/Helmholtz resonance frequency of the pressure chamber


103


.




Now, referring to

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


8


, an operation of one of the inkjet heads of the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment will be described.




For example, the controller


10


shown in

FIG. 1

applies drive voltages to the piezoelectric element


106


of the inkjet head shown in

FIG. 2

for time T


1


according to the waveform shown at (a) or (b) in FIG.


8


. Thus, the piezoelectric element


106


contracts, and accordingly, the pressure chamber


103


expands for time T


1


. As a result, the meniscus retreats into the nozzle opening


101


, and simultaneously, the ink in the common ink chamber


105


is conducted into the pressure chamber


103


via the feed port


104


.




Then, the controller


10


applies drive voltages to the piezoelectric element


106


for time T


2


according to the waveform shown at (a) or (b) in FIG.


8


. Thus, the piezoelectric element


106


expands thereby to contract the pressure chamber


103


. As a result an ink drop is injected via the nozzle opening


101


.




Then, the controller


10


applies drive voltages to the piezoelectric element


106


for time T


3


according to the waveform shown at (a) or (b) in

FIG. 8

Thus, the volume of the pressure chamber


103


is held unchanged for time T


3


or gradually reduced lore time T


3


.




Then, the controller


10


applies drive voltages to the piezoelectric element


106


for time T


1


according to the waveform shown at (a) or (b) in FIG.


8


. Thus, the volume of the pressure chamber


103


is restored to the initial state after a lapse of time T


4


.




During the foregoing operation, the controller


10


controls a time relationship to be T


3


≦Tc or (T


2


+T


3


)≦Tc.




Specifically, the T


3


portion of the waveform is for transition to the T


4


portion to stop the movement, of the piezoelectric element or gradually expand the piezoelectric element for enhancing an effect achieved by the T


4


portion.




The contraction of the piezoelectric element at the T


4


portion is for expanding the pressure chamber


103


thereby to retreat the meniscus into :he nozzle opening


101


for the purpose of preventing flying of satellite drop which would be otherwise cause by meniscus vibration after an injection of an ink drop.




Since the timing to start the T


4


portion should be before flying of a satellite drop via the nuzzle opening


101


occurs due to the meniscus displacement (see

FIG. 9

) caused by the meniscus vibration, the controller


10


controls the time relationship to be T


3


<Tc or (T


2


|T


3


)≦Tc as described above.





FIG. 9

is a waveform diagram showing a relationship between a meniscus displacement and a drive voltage applying time in the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment.




In

FIG. 9

, a broken line waveform represents the conventional meniscus displacement, while a solid line waveform represents the meniscus displacement according to this embodiment wherein the foregoing control is carried out. Since the meniscus vibration after an injection of an ink drop is suppressed as shown by the solid line waveform in

FIG. 9

, flying of a satellite drop is prevented.




As appreciated the waveforms shown in

FIGS. 8 and 9

are only examples, and other waveforms may be used instead of them.




Fourth Embodiment




In this embodiment, an inkjet printing device prevents a disorder of an output image, which would be otherwise caused by reduction in size of a dot formed on a print medium due to an influence of a sticky material formed at a nozzle opening of an inkjet head or by reduction in ink drop speed (average speed while ink flies as an ink drop) due to such a sticky material.





FIG. 10

is a block diagram showing the whole structure of a drive control circuit of the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment.




The drive control circuit in this embodiment comprises a controlled


82


for performing a control of the whole circuit. D/A converters


84




1


,


85




2


, . . . ,


84




n


each for converting a digital signal outputted from the controller


82


into an analog voltage signal, piezoelectric elements


85




1


,


85




2


, . . . ,


85




n


driven by analog voltage signals fed from the corresponding D/A converters


84




1


,


84




2


, . . . ,


84




n


, a waveform invention


83


storing waveforms of the analog voltage signals to be applied to the piezoelectric elements


85




1


,


85




2


, . . . ,


85




n


and feeding them to the controller


82


, and a CPU


81


for feeding a command to the controller


82


about a control to be executed.




In this embodiment, a structure of each of inkjet heads of the inkjet printing device is same that of the first preferred embodiment shown in FIG.


2


.




Output lines of the D/A converters


84




1


,


84




2


, . . . ,


84




n


correspond to output lines of the drive control portion


111


shown in FIG.


2


.




A control executed by the controller


82


of the inkjet printing device in this embodiment may also be executed in the foregoing first to third preferred embodiments.





FIG. 11

is a sectional view showing a structure of one of inkjet heads of the inkjet printing device at a portion around a nozzle opening.




In

FIG. 11

, a common ink chamber


105


is filled with ink


115


which is injected via a nozzle opening


101


of a nozzle


114


to the exterior as an ink drop.




A sticky material


113


remains after vaporization of the ink and adheres to the nozzle opening


101


. After an ink drop is injected to the exterior, water contained in the ink is vaporized before a subsequent ink drop is injected to the exterior. The sticky material


113


is formed during this vaporization. Specifically, during the vaporization, the ink adhering to the nozzle opening


101


changes in mixing ratio of ink components and materiality values (viscosity, density, surface tension, etc. The sticky material


113


exists in the process of such changes.




Due to the existence of the sticky material


113


, the ink drop speed, i.e. the average speed while the ink flies as an ink drop, is affected, and in general, is lowered as compared with the expected average speed.





FIG. 12

is a diagram for explaining a variation in speed of ink drops injected via a nozzle opening of one of the ink jet heads of the inkjet printing device.




When the sticky material


113


adheres in the nozzle opening


101


, the volume of an ink drop


121




b


is reduced as compared with that of an ink drop


121




a


. Accordingly, for the reason explained in the foregoing first preferred embodiment, the ink drop speed of the ink drop


121




b


is lowered by, for example, ox as shown in

FIG. 12

as compared with the ink drop speed of the ink drop


121




a


where no sticky material is attached to the nozzle opening


101


.




The lowering of the ink drop speed device dislocation of a hit position of an ink drop relative to a correct hit position on the print medium.




As a result, the existence of the sticky material


113


causes an insufficient dot size on the print medium and dislocation of a hit position on the print medium. The degree or dot size insufficiency or hit position dislocation becomes greater as a time from an injection of an ink drop to an injection of a subsequent ink drop becomes longer, and finally exceeds an allowable range.




In

FIG. 13

, (a) is a graph showing a relationship between ink drop flying intervals (Trg.) and ink drop hit positions on the print medium according to the prior art, wherein a region defined by broken lines represents an allowable clot dislocation range, and (b) is a graph showing a relationship between ink drop flying intervals (Trg.) and ink dot sizes on the print medium according to the prior art, wherein a region defined by broken lines represents an allowable dot size range.




As shown in

FIG. 13

, as an ink drop flying interval (Trg.), i.e. a time from an injection of an ink drop to an injection of a subsequent ink drop, is prolonged, the degrees of ink dot dislocation on the print medium and dot size variation on the print medium are increased to finally exceed the respective allowable ranges.




However, these drawbacks can be solved by changing a waveform of the foregoing analog voltage signal applied to each of the piezoelectric elements


85




1


,


85




2


, . . . ,


85




n


.





FIG. 14

is a diagram showing that ink dot positions and ink dot sizes on the print medium can he controlled to fall within the respective allowable ranges by changing a waveform of the voltage signal applied to the piezoelectric element of the inkjet printing device corresponding to increment of the ink drop flying interval (Trg.).




In

FIG. 14

, {circle around (


1


)} to {circle around (


5


)} represent the numbers of pulses discontinuously inputted to the piezoelectric element, and these numbers of pulses correspond to increment of the ink drop flying interval (Trg.).




Pulse waveforms shown corresponding to the foregoing numbers of pulses represent voltage waveforms applied to the piezoelectric element, which will be described later in detail.

FIG. 14

is an explanatory diagram for showing that the pulse waveform is changed corresponding to increment of the ink drop flying interval (Trg.).




As appreciated, in

FIG. 14

, regions defined by broken lines represent the allowable dot dislocation and dot size ranges, respectively. Thus,

FIG. 14

shows the slates at (a) and (b) wherein the ink dot positions and sizes are successfully controlled to be within the respective allowable ranges corresponding to the respective numbers {circle around (


1


)} to {circle around (


5


)}.




Specifically, in this embodiment, the ink drop flying interval (Trg.) is monitored per nozzle and upon injecting an ink drop via each nozzle, a voltage pulse signal of a given waveform corresponding to the ink drop flying interval (Trg.) of the associated nozzle is applied to piezoelectric element of the associated nozzle.




More specifically, the waveform of the voltage pulse signal is changed corresponding w the ink drop flying interval (Trg.) of the associated nozzle using a predetermined rule. In other words, the waveform of the voltage pulse signal is selected from among prestored waveforms corresponding to the ink drop living interval (Trg.) of the associated nozzle. This selection is carried out by the CPU


81


shown in FIG.


10


.





FIG. 15

is a diagram showing waveforms of a voltage pulse signal applied to a piezoelectric element of the inkjet printing device according to this embodiment, wherein (a) is a graph showing a typical waveform of the voltage pulse signal applied to the piezoelectric element, and (b) is a label representing various waveforms of the voltage pulse signal applied to the piezoelectric element in terms of ratios of heights of main portions of the waveform shown at (a) in FIG.


15


.




As shown in

FIG. 15

, the waveform of the drive voltage signal includes two continuous rising portions following a descending portion. These two rising portions have different inclinations, and the wave heights of these two rising portions are determined corresponding to the flying interval of an ink drop to be injected via the nozzle




The foregoing predetermined rule, i.e. relationships between the ink drop fling intervals (Trg.) and the corresponding waveforms of the drive voltage signal, may be provided in the form of a table, e.g. a computer readable table.




The ink drop flying interval (Trg.) is measured per nozzle, and to be exact, should be measured excluding a flying time of a remainder of an ink drop caused residual vibration shown in

FIG. 16

of the inkjet head shown in FIG.


2


. Such a measuring function may be provided in the form of firmware.




In this embodiment, the ink drop flying internal (Trg.) is measured excluding time of residual vibration of the ink jet head as shown in FIG.


16


.





FIG. 17

is a flowchart showing an operation of the CPU


81


of the drive control circuit to select a waveform of a drive voltage signal applied to a piezoelectric element of an inkjet head according to this embodiment.




Referring also to

FIGS. 2 and 10

to


16


, the operation of the CPU


81


will be desired hereinbelow.




Steps S


1


and S


16


represent that a series of processes between those steps is applied to all the nozzles i


1


to m.




At step S


12


, it is checked whether the subject nozzle is at the injection timing of an ink drop. If negative, the procedure goes to step S


15


where a unit injection interval i.e. “1”, is added to a flying interval (Trg.) of the subject nozzle.




On the other hand, if positive at step S


12


, the procedure goes to step S


13


where a waveform of a drive voltage signal to be applied to a corresponding piezoelectric element is selected corresponding to the flying interval (Trg.) of the subject nozzle. If the flying interval (Trg.) of the subject nozzle exceeds a predetermined time, a spray process is selected to once return a corresponding inkjet head (having the subject nozzle) to a home position and then forcibly remove a sticky material adhering to a nozzle opening of the subject nozzle.




After the foregoing series of processes is executed relative to all the nozzles i


1


to m, the procedure goes to step S


17


where it is checked whether the subject inkjet head is at the timing of line change if negative the procedure is ended.




On the other hand, if positive at step


17


, procedure goes to step S


18


where RF, i.e. a time required for line change, is added to the flying intervals (Trg,) of all the nozzles i−


1


to m, and then is ended.




The waveform of the drive voltage signal selected by the CPU


81


for each of the nozzles is notified to the controller


82


so that a concrete digital waveform signal corresponding to the selected waveform for each nozzle is fed to the controller


82


from the waveform memory


83


. Then, the controller


82


distributes the respective waveform signals to the corresponding piezoelectric elements


85




1


,


85




2


, . . . ,


85




n


via the D/A converters


84




1


,


84




2


, . . . ,


84




n.






It may also he arranged that the waveform memory


83


is provided in a given region set in the CPU


81


.




According to the foregoing preferred embodiments of the present invention, the accuracy of ink drop hit positions and ink dot sizes on the print medium can be improved in the halftone printing. Specifically it can solve the conventional problem that due to a difference in size of ink drops a change in drive frequency, flying of a satellite drop as used by meniscus vibration after an injection of an ink drop or increment of a flying interval of an ink drop to be injected via the nozzle an ink drop hits upon the print medium at a position dislocated from an expected position or the dot size changes. As a result, the disorder of the output image can be prevented to enhance the printing quality.




Further, since the injection of all the ink drops is carried out by the single-pass technique, the printing speed is highly increased as compared with the conventional multi-pass printing.




While the present invention has been described in terms of the preferred embodiments the invention is not to be limited thereto, but can be embodied in various ways without departing from the principle of the invention as defined in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. An inkjet printing method wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing method comprising:changing upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle, an injection timing of the ink drop corresponding to a drive frequency of said drive voltages using a predetermined rule which is prestored.
  • 2. The inkjet priming method according to claim 1, wherein said prestored predetermined rule comprises a table defined in terms of drive frequencies of the drive voltages and optimum injection timings of the ink drop corresponding to the drive frequencies.
  • 3. An inkjet printing method wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber of an inkjet head filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing method comprising:controlling the inkjet head upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle such that T3≦Tc or (T2+T3)≦Tc, wherein T2 represents a time for rapidly contracting the pressure chamber after T1 representing a time for expanding the pressure chamber, T3 represents time for holding the contracted state of the pressure chamber or further contracting the pressure chamber gradually, T4 represents a time or restoring the pressure chamber to an initial state, and Tc represents a period given by 1/Helmholtz resonance frequency of the pressure chamber.
  • 4. An ink jet printing method wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber tilled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing method comprising:determining a waveform of said drive voltages corresponding to a flying interval of the ink drop using a predetermined rule which is prestored, said flying interval being defined as a time from an injection of an ink drop to an injection of a subsequent ink drop.
  • 5. The inkjet printing method according to claim 4, wherein the waveform of said drive voltages includes two continuous rising portions following a descending portion and having different inclinations, and wave heights of said two rising portions are defined in said prestored predetermined rule.
  • 6. The inkjet printing method according to claim 4, wherein said prestored predetermined rule comprises a table defined in terms of flying intervals of ink drops to be injected via the nozzle and optimum waveforms of drive voltages corresponding to said flying intervals.
  • 7. An inkjet printing device wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing device characterized by:changing, upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle, an injection timing of the ink drop corresponding to a drive frequency of said drive voltages using a predetermined rule which is prestored.
  • 8. The inkjet printing device according to claim 7, wherein said prestored predetermined rule comprises a table defined in terms of drive frequencies of the drive voltages and optimum injection timings of the ink crop corresponding to the drive frequencies.
  • 9. An inkjet printing device wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber of an inkjet head filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing the inkjet printing device characterized by:controlling the inkjet head upon injecting the ink drop via the nozzle such that T3<Tc or (T2+T3)≦Tc, wherein T2 represents a time for rapidly contracting the pressure chamber after T1 representing a time for expanding the pressure chamber, T3 represents a lime for holding the contracted state of the pressure chamber or further contracting the pressure chamber gradually, T4 represents a time for restoring the pressure chamber to an initial state, and Tc represents a period given by 1/Helmholtz resonance frequency of the pressure chamber.
  • 10. An inkjet printing device wherein an ink drop is injected via a nozzle by changing drive voltages applied to a piezoelectric element to reduce the volume of a pressure chamber filled with ink, so that the injected ink drop hits upon a print medium to carry out printing, the inkjet printing device characterized by:determining a waveform of said drive voltages corresponding to a flying interval of the ink drop using a predetermined rule which is prestored, said flying interval being defined as a time from an injection of an ink drop to an injection of a subsequent ink drop.
  • 11. The inkjet printing device according to claim 10, wherein the waveform of said drive voltages includes two continuous using portions following a descending portion and having different inclinations, and wave heights of said two rising portions and defined in said prestored predetermined rule.
  • 12. The inkjet printing device according to claim 10, wherein said prestored predetermined rule comprises a table defined in terms of flying intervals of ink drops to be injected via the nozzle and optimum waveforms of drive voltages corresponding to said flying intervals.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
10-217579 Jul 1998 JP
11-191266 Jul 1999 JP
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/246,705, filed Feb. 9, 1999, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
5610637 Sekiya et al. Mar 1997 A
5631675 Futagawa May 1997 A
5906481 Ogawa et al. May 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
6-155732 Jun 1994 JP
7-148920 Jun 1995 JP
6-220631 Feb 1996 JP
8-85210 Apr 1996 JP
9-39244 Feb 1997 JP
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/246705 Feb 1999 US
Child 09/611371 US