Inorganic composition, process of preparation and method of use

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6306308
  • Patent Number
    6,306,308
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 20, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 23, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A coagulant which is the reaction product of a trivalent metal salt (eg., FeCl3), excluding chromium salts, an acid phosphorous compound and an aluminum hydroxy chloride, and a process for preparing such coagulant. This coagulant may be effectively used to remove suspended solids and various impurities in most water treatment applications.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to coagulants for water treatment applications. In general, coagulants are utilized to remove suspended solid particles from aqueous systems.




Coagulants typically fall into the general category of inorganic (trivalent, divalent metal salts) or organic (water soluble polyelectrolytes). Examples of widely used inorganic coagulants are aluminum sulfate Al


2


(SO


4


)


3


, aluminum chloride AlCl


3


, aluminum chlorohydrate Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl, ferric chloride FeCl


3


, ferric sulfate Fe


2


(So


4


)


3


, and calcium chloride. Examples of commonly used water soluble or solution polyelectrolytes are p-DMDAAC (polydimethyl diallyl ammonium chloride) and Epi-DMA polyamine Epichlorohydrin-dimethylamine).




Many inorganic coagulants are compatible with solution cationic polyelectrolytes and can be combined to form stable combinations. In recent years, many different blend formulations of an inorganic coagulant with a high charge solution cationic polyelectrolyte have been patented and marketed. An example of an inorganic coagulant/polymer blend might be: 5 parts of a standard 280 Baumé AlCl


3


solution mixed with 1 part of Epi-DMA polyamine. More examples, limits, and ranges are explained in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,746,457, 4,900,019, and 5,035,808 to Calgon Corporation, and further in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,862,880, 3,285,849, 3,472,767, 3,489,681, 3,617,569, 4,137,165, 4,450,092, 4,582,627, 4,610,801, and 4,655,934, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Normally, these compositions are physical blends of an inorganic trivalent metal salt solution and a water soluble polymer solution, which is a simple mixture of the components where both components retain their original identity or chemical composition, but provide utility and advantages such as:




1. a synergy of adding the inorganic and polymeric coagulants simultaneously as a blend; and




2. ease of use—using one product instead of two (thereby eliminating feed systems, equipment, and handling).




Wastewater treatment systems typically require the use of trivalent metal salts, a polymer or a combination of both in the coagulation process. Both ferric coagulants such as FeCl


3


blends and aluminum coagulants such as alum or Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl blends are often used for these processes. Both the ferric and aluminum coagulants provide different desirable properties. However, these coagulants are normally incompatible with each other.




It was thus desired in the art to develop a single coagulant which would combine the desirable properties of ferric and aluminum coagulants.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention comprises a composition that is the reaction product of a trivalent metal salt, excluding chromium salts, an acid phosphorous compound and an aluminum hydroxy chloride, and a process for preparing the same.




The method of use according to the present invention comprises adding this reaction product in an effective amount to the solution to be treated. The composition of the present invention is an excellent and unique coagulant for most water treatment applications.




As used herein, the phrase “effective amount” refers to that amount of the claimed reaction product which is helpful to at least partially treat (Coagulate) the impurities in the wastewater or system being treated.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The above composition will become more apparent when reference is made to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the appended figures, in which:





FIG. 1

is an Al-27 NMR spectrum of monoaluminum phosphate;





FIG. 2

is an Al-27 NMR spectrum of aluminum chlorohydrate; and





FIG. 3

is an Al-27 NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture of iron(III) chloride, monoaluminum phosphate and aluminum chlorohydrate.











These figures are discussed in detail below.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention was discovered when the inventors were attempting to obtain the desirable properties of FeCl


3


blends and Al(OH)


5


Cl blends by mixing these two inorganics and then combining the resultant mixture with a cationic polyelectolyte and other ingredients. However, they discovered that mixtures of trivalent metal salts such as FeCl


3


and aluminum hydroxy chlorides such as Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl are incompatible and all attempts to combine such mixtures ended in a gelled/solidified reaction product which was not usable.




It was unexpectedly discovered that FeCl


3


solution and Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl solution can be stabilized and combined through the use of a third ingredient, monoaluminum phosphate. The inventors have discovered a method of combining these previously incompatible coagulants and creating a stable, complex ion coordination compound that exhibits increased efficacy as a coagulant for industrial and municipal water treatment.




A composition, and process for preparing the same, has been discovered by the inventors comprising the reaction product of a trivalent metal salt other than chrominum salts, an aluminum hydroxy chloride, and an acid phosphorous compound which acts as a stabilizing compound.




The preferred process of preparing the present invention is the addition of the acid phosphorous compound (stabilizer) to the trivalent metal salt, soon followed by the addition of the aluminum hydroxy chloride. A small exotherm results from the addition of the acid phosphorous compound (stabilizer) to the trivalent metal salt. A larger and more vigorous exotherm results from the subsequent addition of the aluminum hydroxy chloride. Based upon this exotherm, as well as color changes and partial precipitation (and re-dissolution), it is believed that the components are reacting and a new compound is formed. Although the order of addition of these compounds to form the new compound may be altered, the above order of addition is preferred. If the trivalent metal salt and the aluminum hydroxy chloride are combined without the acid phosphorous compound, a slurry will be formed which will generally solidify in less than an hour. In order to create a stable final product, if this order of addition is utilized, the acid phosphorous compound should be added to this mixture prior to solidification, or preferably within 40 minutes. However, reconstitution after solidification is possible by the addition of the acid phosphorous compound. The least preferred order of addition is when the acid phosphorous compound is alone first mixed with the aluminum hydroxy chloride, because a solid mass will be formed almost instantaneously. However, this solid mass can be reconstituted by the addition of FeCl


3


. For these reasons, the above noted order of addition is preferred.




This new resultant compound is stable and appears to be different in composition from the compounds used in the preparation process. The conclusion that a new compound is formed is supported by

FIGS. 1-3

which illustrate Al-27 NMR spectra for a compound formed from the reaction of the volume formula 10 FeCl


3


(about 40% active raw material in water), 3 monoaluminum phosphate (Al(H


2


PO


4


)


3


.XH


2


O) (about 50 wt % in water), and 5 Al (OH)


5


Cl (about 50 wt % in water). Commerciably available FeCl


3


solution is 38 to 42% active raw material in water. Commercially available monoaluminum phosphate and Al(OH)


5


Cl are both 50 wt % in water, plus or minus 1 to 2%.




The combination of a peak's shape and position yield structural information in NMR spectroscopy. The position is based upon a relative marker to a selected standard material and is measured in ppm shifts in frequency. The standard reference material used in these spectra was aluminum oxide (Al


2


O


3


) at 0 ppm. The shape of the peak (singlet, doublet, etc.) is dependent upon the nuclei's interaction with neighboring atoms. The combination of peak position and shape is a function of the nuclei's environment, and thus, its structure.





FIG. 1

is an Al-27 NMR spectrum of monoaluminum phosphate. This spectrum shows a single band centered at ca. −77.7 ppm relative to the standard. The width of the peak is indicative of the structure in solution.





FIG. 2

is an Al-27 NMR spectrum of aluminum chlorohydrate (Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl). This spectrum shows a very broad set of peaks centered at ca. −57.8 and −68.6 ppm with the former peak being the much stronger band. This spectrum shows two peaks which are overlapped. There are also two significantly smaller peaks on either side of these two major bands which are probably minor impurities. This material is known to be polymeric in nature. In general, the higher the molecular weight of a material the more broad the peaks become.





FIG. 3

is an Al-27 NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture of the present invention. This spectrum shows the product of the claimed reaction mixture of iron(III) chloride, monoaluminum phosphate and aluminum chlorohydrate according to the current reaction, using the concentrations and parts per volume of these three compounds in the preferred embodiment. In

FIG. 3

, the aluminum NMR peak is a very much sharper singlet and is shifted to a position at ca. −26.2 ppm relative to the standard. These changes indicate that a reaction has taken place, that the two component raw materials (iron(III) chloride and aluminum chlorohydrate) are most likely limiting reagents in this reaction, and that the structure of the final product is simpler than the aluminum chlorohydrate precursor. The aluminum exists in a single type of chemical environment, hence the rationale for the proposed structure of a new compound.




The molecular formula of this preferred embodiment, which is the subject of

FIG. 3

is:




Iron(III) salt of [Al


n


(OH)


a


(H


2


PO


4


)


b


(Cl)


c


(H


2


O)


d


]


3n−a−b−c






where a+b+c>3n




This new composition is the product of a Lewis/Acid Base type reaction in which a stable, complex ion coordination compound is formed as follows:




A+B→“intermediate” (4° C. temperature rise observed) “intermediate”+C→new compound (20° C. temperature rise observed)



















where:




(% Active Basis)













A = Iron Chloride




17.5%-20%







B = Phosphoric Acid, Aluminum Salt (3:1)




  8%-10%







C = Aluminum Chloride, Basic




11.0%-13%















A typical structure of this new compound of the preferred embodiment is represented below where the H


2


O, Cl, OH and H


2


PO


4


ligands can vary in number, as well as in their position on the metal ion in the coordination complex. The nature of the bond between each ligand and the central metal atom is coordinate Covalent.











The preferred embodiment of the present invention composition, by volume, is:




10 FeCl


3


(aqueous solution about 40% active raw material in water)




3 Monoaluminum phosphate (Al(H


2


PO


4


)


3


.XH


2


O) (about 50 wt % in water)




5 Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl (about 50 wt % in water)




1 CaCl


2


(30% solution)




2 Ca-250 (Epi-DMA polyamine) (50 wt % in water)




Multiple experiments involving the modification of the volume of the above ingredients in the preferred embodiment have been performed. It has been determined that although the above noted volumes provide the preferred combination, these ratios may be altered while still maintaining a stable reaction product and the desired coagulation properties to varying degrees. It has been determined that (using the concentrations set forth above) the volume of the FeCl


3


component may be varied from 3 to 30 parts, the monoaluminum phosphate may be varied from 0.5 to 10 parts, and the Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl may be increased to as high as 20 parts. However, the upper limit of the Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl volume appears to be 20 because precipitation begins to occur at this level. Although the quality of the resultant compounds varied proportionally with the deviation from the preferred embodiment, the resultant compounds provided stable reaction products. Further tests have performed varying the combinations of different trivalent metal salts, acid phosphorous compounds and aluminum hydroxy chlorides, as well as the volumes of each such component. The Example below demonstrates the results of selected tests on volume and component variations.




The volumetric ratios set forth above for components of the preferred embodiment are also applicable to the various claimed combinations of the other trivalent metal salts, acid phosphorous compounds and aluminum hydroxy chlorides. It is known by one skilled in the art that these various compounds can be obtained in varying concentrations. In order to obtain the most preferred ratio of components of various substitute components of varying concentration, one must obtain the same ratio of molar amounts of ferric, phosphate or phosphite and aluminum as that of the preferred embodiment above. For example, phosphoric acid is commercially available in about 85 wt % in water as compared to about 50 wt % of monoaluminum phosphate. Thus a component of different concentration can be used if the correct molar ratio is obtained.




It appears that the calcium chloride and CA-250 components are present only as a physical blend with the compound which is the result of the reaction. The resulting blend of the reaction product and the CaCl


2


and CA-250 (Epi-DMA polyamine) is a “sweep-floc” which functions as a coagulant and a flocculent and, as noted above, could be useful in many water treatment processes. Other standard additives can also be mixed with the reaction product.




In place of the CA-250 (Epi-DMA polyamine), p-DMDAAC may be utilized under certain circumstances in the physical blend with the subject reaction product. The p-DMDAAC may be utilized when the trivalent metal salt FeCl


3


(in the preferred embodiment) is diluted by 10 to 40% with water prior to the addition of the acid phosphorous compound and the aluminum hydroxy chloride. In order to utilize p-DMDAAC with the already prepared reaction product of the preferred embodiment, the entire reaction product must be diluted by 10 to 40% with water prior to the addition of p-DMDAAC. If phosphoric acid is substituted for the monoaluminum phosphate of the preferred embodiment, dilution of either FeCl


3


or the entire reaction product should be by 10 to 80% with water, otherwise precipitation will occur.




Tests have also been performed involving the variance of the amounts of CaCl


2


and the amount of the CA-250 (Epi-DMA polyamine). The volumes of these compounds have been varied both together and on an independent basis. The variance of these two components appears to have a negligible effect on the formulation.




As noted above, although the preferred embodiment utilizes FeCl


3


as the trivalent metal salt, monoaluminum phosphate as the acid phosphorous compound, and Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl as the aluminum hydroxy chloride, substitutions may be made for each of these compounds while still resulting in a stable, effective reaction product.




The preferred trivalent metal salts are those of Group 8. The more preferred trivalent metal salts are metal halides. However, the most preferred trivalent metal salts are ferric, such as FeCl


3


, Fe


2


(SO


4


)


3


, FeBr


3


and Fe(NO


3


)


3


. Additionally, blends of the foregoing may be utilized. Ferric halide is more preferred, while ferric chloride is Most preferred. The preferred anions of the salt are chloride and halide. Sulfate is a less preferred anion of the salt. Nitrate may also be employed as an anion for the salt.




The preferred acid phosphorous compounds of the present invention are selected from the group consisting of acid phosphites (including phosphorous acid), acid phosphates (including phosphoric acid), and phosphonic acid. Acid phosphorous compounds having the following formula may be utilized:






M


n


H


x


PO


q








Where




M=cation such as a metal or ammonium




n=0 to 2




x=1 to 3




q=3 or 4.




For example, the following acid phosphorous compounds may be utilized: monoaluminum phosphate (Al(H


2


PO


4


)


3


.XH


2


O), phosphoric acid (H


3


PO


4


), phosphorous acid (H


3


PO


3


), sodium phosphate monobasic (NaH


2


PO


4


), sodium phosphate dibasic (Na


2


HPO


4


), HEDP ((CH


3


C(OH)(PO


3


H


2


)), vinyl phosphonic acid (H


2


C═CHP(O)(OH)


2


), dimethyl phosphite ((CH


3


O


2


)P


2


(O)H), (NH


4


)


2


HPO


4


, NH


4


H


2


PO


4


, potassium phosphate monobasic (KH


2


PO


4


), and K


2


HPO


4


. The more preferred acid phosphorous compounds are those which are non-organic due to their lower cost.




The aluminum hydroxy chloride compounds which may be used in the formulation of the composition of the present invention are those of the general formula Al


2


(OH)


y


Cl


z


, where y=0.1 to 5 and z=1 to 5.9 The more preferred are those where y=1 to 5 and z=1 to 5. The most preferred are those where y=1.8 to 5 and z=1 to 4.2.




In preparing the claimed reaction product, AlCl


3


can be utilized as the trivalent metal salt and combined with Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl and a stabilizer (acid phosphorous compound). An exotherm will occur and a reaction product will be formed. AlCl


3


can also be utilized as a substitute for the aluminum hydroxy chloride component and combined with FeCl


3


and a stabilizer. However, in this circumstance, a reaction product is not formed and a blend is achieved. Nevertheless, this blend exhibits good coagulation properties.




Experiments have also been performed where the CaCl


2


compound has been substituted with MgCl


2


and BaCl


2


without resulting serious detriment to the performance of the resultant mixture with the reaction product. The CA-250 (Epi-DMA polyamine) may also be substituted with other Epi-DMA polyamines. CA-250 is preferred because of its relative low to medium molecular weight. CA-250 is a commercial polyamine product sold by Calgon Corporation.




This resultant new compound has been demonstrated to be an excellent and unique coagulant for most water treatment applications including E-coat waste treatment, water-borne paint waste coagulation, oily waste and solvent-borne paint detackification. It is also exhibits utility in general wastewater treatment, municipal wastewater treatment, metals removal from water, paper making waste water, water containing chemical compounds, water containing organic compounds, water containing biological compounds, poultry processing waste, ink containing solutions, raw water clarification (such as municipal drinking water and industrial purification), oil/water separation, water containing suspended solids, color removal (colored solutions), waste clay slurry, coal waste, mineral processing water, oily waste, water containing suspended solids, water containing paint solids and others. The resultant new compound has also been demonstrated to remove metals from water, including heavy metals such as lead and nickel. E-coat waste is the wastewater generated from electrolytic primer coating.




The method of using the new compound for coagulation in these various systems consists of adding the new compound to the system in an effective amount.




This new compound also may be utilized for enhanced coagulation. Enhanced coagulation is the reduction of total organic contaminants (TOC). The reduction of organic contaminants in drinking water is desirable to minimize formation of chlorinated hydrocarbons formed during the chlorination process.




The most preferred method for producing the claimed reaction product entails the following steps:




1. At ambient temperature, add 3 parts by volume monoaluminum phosphate solution (about 50 wt % in water) to 10 parts by volume FeCl


3


aqueous solution (about 40% active raw material in water). During the addition of the monoaluminum phosphate solution to the FeCl


3


solution, some reaction will take place. There may be some partial precipitations and color changes—and striations in the solutions. However, when the reaction is complete, everything is in solution and it appears stable.




2. Next, the 5 parts by volume aluminum chlorohydrate solution (about 50 wt % in water) is added to the mixture of FeCl


3


and monoaluminum phosphate (and further reaction takes place). The resultant solution goes through a violent exotherm. The solution becomes hot, and the solution becomes homogeneous. When the solution cools down, it remains compatible and homogeneous.




3. Preferably, 1 part by volume CaCl


2


(30% solution) and 2 parts per volume of a polymer, such as CA-250 (Epi-DMA polyamine 50 wt %) are then added. The CaCl


2


is added for hardness and the polymer to enhance coagulation and to begin flocculation (to help form the pin floc). There appears to be no further reaction when the CaCl


2


and the polymer are added.




As noted above, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that this process may be duplicated utilizing the other trivalent metal salts, acid phosphorous compounds, and aluminum hydroxy chlorides herein claimed, if the same noted molar ratios are utilized.




EXAMPLE




The following example is included to further describe and demonstrate the invention in greater detail. This example is not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way. This example, and the tables included therein, demonstrate the performance of the claimed invention, including the preferred embodiment and other claimed reaction products formed from various Group 8 trivalent metal salts, acid phosphorous compounds and aluminum hydroxy chloride components, on the treatment of E-coat waste. Also included are entries illustrating the effectiveness of treating E-coat waste with only a trivalent metal salt and only an aluminum hydroxy compound.




The following test procedure was used to compile the results contained in the following tables.




Dilution of Product




1. 2.5 gms of the selected coagulant and/or reaction product was weighed and placed into a B-cup.




2. 7.5 gms of deionized water was placed into the same B-cup and mixed until uniform.




Test Procedure




1. 495 mls of deionized water was added to a glass jar (a graduated cylinder was used).




2. The glass jar was placed on a gang stirrer and mixed at 100 rpm.




3. 5 mls of neat E-coat waste was added to the water.




4. 0.6 mls of the selected coagulant and/or reaction product solution (300 ppm) was added to the glass jar.




5. The solution was mixed at 100 rpm for 15 seconds.




6. The pH was lowered to 2.9 using stock H


2


SO


4


(10 gm H


2


SO


4


+190 gm DiH


2


O).




7. The number of drops of stock H


2


SO


4


used to lower the pH was recorded.




8. The solution was mixed at 100 rpm for 15 seconds.




9. The pH was increased to 8.5 using a soda ash solution (20 gm soda ash+80 gm DiH


2


O).




10. The number of drops of soda ash solution used to increase the pH was recorded.




11. The solution was mixed at 100 rpm for 15 seconds.




12. 2 mls of flocculent—Pol EZ 8736 or Pol EZ 7736 [0.5% product] which are commercially available high molecular weight polymers sold by Calgon Corporation—was placed in a syringe and added by the following method:




a) the tip of the syringe was placed below the surface of the solution at approximately the top of the vortex;




b) the flocculent was added and timed for exactly 10 seconds;




c) after the ten second period ended, the agitation was turned down to 50-60 rpm;




d) the floc was allowed to develop for 30 seconds; and




e) the agitation was then turned off.




13. The floc was then allowed to settle for 10 minutes.




14. The floc size and the appearance of the solution was then recorded (visual inspection only).




15. 20 mls of the solution was removed with a syringe for a turbidity reading.




16. The turbidity reading in NTU (nephelometric turbidity units) was recorded.




17. The agitation was then turned on and the motion speed was slowly increased to ≦50 rpm.




18. The solution was mixed for 30 seconds and the percentage of detackification was recorded.




19. The motor speed was then increased to 100 rpm and the solution was mixed for 30 seconds.




20. The percentage of detackification was then recorded (if detackification of 100% was recorded at 50 rpm, no reading was necessary at 100 rpm and therefore was not taken).




Unless otherwise noted, this procedure was utilized to obtain the results set forth in the tables below. Flocculation refers to the settling of suspended solid particles in the solution. Turbidity as used herein is defined as the cloudiness of the solution caused by suspended particles.












TABLE 1











This table illustrates the performance of the






preferred embodiment, 10 FeCl


3


, 3 (Al(H


2


PO


4


)


3


.XH


2


O) and 5






Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl, 1 CaCl


2


and 2 Ca-250, in the concentrations set forth






above, as 3930-93. In 3982-84A, the (Al(H


2


PO


4


)


3


.XH


2


O) was






substituted with HEDP in the same molar ratio. In 3982-86A and






3982-87, the (Al(H


2


PO


4


)


3


.XH


2


O) has been likewise substituted






with vinyl phosphonic acid and dimethyl phosphite, respectively.
















3930-93




3982-84A




3982-86A




3982-87



















Description




Preferred




HEDP




Vinyl Phosphonic




Dimethyl Phosphite







embodiment






Product Dilution




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/






(Deionized water/product)




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms






Appearance




medium amber




med-dk amber




yellow




very pale blue






Use Concentration




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/






(mls/ppm)




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm






E-coat Composition




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/







5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls






pH to 2.9




30 drops




29 drops




34 drops




31 drops






pH to 8.5




45 drops




50 drops




52 drops




40 drops






Floc size/appearance




large/hazy




med fluffy/




large/lt. haze




med-lg/sl haze








sl haze






Turbidity




93.3




54.2




39.6




72.4






Detackification




good




fair




fair-good




bad






50 rpm:




100%




50 &




65%




0%






100 rpm:





100%




100%




60%






















TABLE 2











This table likewise illustrates how the performance of






the preferred embodiment is effected by changes in the type and






amount of the acid phosphorous compound utilized. The






composition of the preferred embodiment remained constant for






each trial, except: in 3982-79A, a lower volume of (Al(H


2


PO


4


)


3


.XH


2


O)






(“MAP”) was utilized; in 3982-79B, a lower volume of H


3


PO


4








was substituted for the MAP; in 3982-79C, H


3


PO


4


was substituted






for the MAP in the same volume; and in 3982-80G, NaH


2


PO


4


was






substituted for the MAP in the same volume.


















3930-93




3982-79A




3982-79B




3982-79C




3982-80A




3982-80G





















Description




Preferred




Low MAP




Low H


3


PO


4






Std H


3


PO


4






Std Hhd 3PO


3






Std NAH


2


PO


4









Embodiment






Product Dilution




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms






Deionized






water/product






Appearance




good/med amber




good/dk amber




good/dk amber




good/yellow




good/dk amber




good/dk amber






Use Concentration




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm






(mls/ppm)






E-coat Composition




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls






Deionized water/






e-coat waste






pH to 2.9




27 drops




25 drops




24 drops




25 drops




23 drops




24 drops






pH to 8.5




60 drops




60 drops




60 drops




60 drops




60 drops




60 drops






Floc




very lg/sl haze




lg. tight/very sl.




very lg./hazy




lg. loose/sl.




med. loose/almost




lg. loose/sl. haze






size/appearance





haz





Haze




clear






Turbidity




90/88




67




72




68




31




44.7






Detackification




Good




Good




Good




Good




Good




Good






50 rpm:




90%




100%




100%




100%




90%




100%






100 rpm:




100%







100%






















TABLE 3











Tables 3 and 4 illustrate the effect of altering the use






concentration of the preferred embodiment. The numbers included






under the heading “Description” refer to the volumes 10 FeCl


3


, 3






(Al(H


2


PO


4


)


3


.XH


2


O), 5 Al


2


(OH


5


)Cl, 1 Cacl


2


and 2 Ca-250, of the






component concentrations of each set forth above.


















#1




#2




#3




#4




#5




#6





















Description




Preferred




Preferred




Preferred




Preferred




Preferred




Preferred Embodiment







Embodiment




Embodiment




Embodiment




Embodiment




Embodiment




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2







10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2






Product




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms






Dilution






Deionized






water/






product






Appearance




amber




amber




amber




amber




amber




amber






Use




0.0 mls/




0.04 mls/




0.10 mls/50 ppm




0.20 mls/




1.00 mls/500 ppm




2.00 mls/1000 ppm






Concentation




0 ppm




20 ppm





100 ppm






(mls/ppm)






E-coat




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls






Composition






Deionized






water/






e-coat waste






pH to 2.9




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a






pH to 8.5




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a






Floc




tacky




tacky




tacky




tacky




hard floc/clear




spongy floc






size/appearance






Turbidity




58.5




49.9




48.2




34.1




14.8




32.9






Detackification




Bad




Bad




Bad




Bad




Good




Good






100 rpm:




0%




0%




0%




0%




100%




100%





























TABLE 4











#1




#2




#3




#4




#5




#6






























Description




Preferred




Preferred




Preferred




Preferred




Preferred




Preferred







Embodiment




Embodiment




Embodiment




Embodiment




Embodiment




Embodiment







10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2




10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2






Product Dilution




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms






Deionized






water/product






Appearance




amber




amber




amber




amber




amber




amber






Use Concentation




0.40 mls/200 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.80 mls/400 ppm




1.00 mls/500 ppm




1.20 mls/600 ppm




1.40 mls/700 ppm






(mls/ppm)






E-coat Composition




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls






Deionized water/






e-coat waste






pH to 2.9




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a






pH to 8.5




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a




n/a






Floc




sl tacky




sl tacky




sl tacky




fluffy




fluffy




fluffy






size/appearance






Turbidity




80.6




62.1




63.9




41.6




39.0




39.9






Detackification




Fair




Good




Good




Good




Good




Good






50 rpm:




>50%




95%




100%




100%




100%




100%






















TABLE 5











Table 5 provides a comparative example of the testing of the






preferred embodiment 3920-93, compared to the performance of the






individual components thereof. Nos. 1 through 5 are demonstrative of






the use of the individual component alone noted after the heading






“Description”.


















3930-93




#1




#2




#3




#4




#5





















Description




Preferred




40% FeCl


3


sol.




50% MAP sol.




50% Al


2


OH


5


Cl




30% CaCl


2


sol.




50% CA-250 sol.







Embodiment






sol.






Product Dilution




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms






Deionized






water/product






Appearance




med amber




yellow




water




water




water




water white/clear









white/clear




white/clear




white/clear






Use Concentation




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm






(mls/ppm)






E-coat Composition




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls






Deionized water/






e-coat waste






pH to 2.9




41 drops




38 drops




44 drops




46 drops




50 drops




50 drops






pH to 8.5




64 drops




64 drops




66 drops




68 drops




69 drpos




70 drops






Floc size/appearance




lg-vig/slight




extra lg/very




lg/hazy




fine/very hazy




very fine/turbid




jelly/turbid







haze




hazy






Turbidity




76




146




138




181




275




296






Detackification




Good




Bad




Very Bad




Fair




None




None






50 rpm:




100%




0%




0%




20%




0%




0%






100 rpm:




100%




40%




20%




75%




0%




0%






















TABLE 6











Table 6 demonstrates the effect of varying the volume






composition of components of the preferred embodiment and the effect






of the complete omission of the Al


2


OH


5


Cl component. The ratios noted






in this table utilize the concentrations of each component set forth






above.


















#1




#2




#3




#4




#5




#6





















Description




FeCl


3


+ MAP




FeCl


3


+ MAP +




Fe


3


+ MAP +




Fe


3


+ MAP +




Fe


3


+ MAP +




Fe


3


+ MAP +






Ratio (mls)




10 + 3




Al


2


OH


5


Cl




Al


2


OH


5


Cl




Al


2


OH


5


Cl




Al


2


OH


5


Cl + CaCl


2






Al


2


OH


5


Cl +








10 + 3 + 5




15 + 3 + 5




10 + 3 + 10




10 + 3 + 5 + 1




CaCl


2


+ CA250












10 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2






Product Dilution




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms




7.5 gms/2.5 gms






Deionized






water/product






Appearance




yellow




amber




amber




very dark amber




amber




amber






Use Concentation




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm




0.60 mls/300 ppm






(mls/ppm)






E-coat Composition




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls




495 mls/5 mls






Deionized water/






e-coat waste






pH to 2.9




34 drops




38 drops




36 drops




40 drops




37 drops




37 drops






pH to 8.5




60 drops




61 drops




63 drops




64 drops




61 drops




62 drops






Floc




lg. fluffy/hazy




lg. sl. fluffy/




lg. fluffy/hazy




lg. fluffy/hazy




large/hazy




large/hazy






size/appearance





very hazy






Turbidity




144




95




103




139




99.3




80






Detackification




Very bad




Good




Fair




Bad




Good




Good






50 rpm:




0%




75%




50%




20%




100%




100%






100 rpm:




20%




95%




75%




50%






















TABLE 7









Table 7 sets forth the results of tests performed utilizing






various aluminum hydroxy chlorides as substitutes for Al


2


OH


5


Cl in the






preferred embodiment. These aluminum hydroxy chlorides are:



























Aluminum hydroxy chloride




FORMULA




% BASICITY




% SOLIDS




% Al


2


O


3











A




Al


2


(OH)


5


Cl




83




50




23.5






Preferred embodiment






B




Al


2


(OH)


3


Cl


2


(SO


4


)


0.5






50




30




10






C




Al


2


(OH)


1.8


CL


4.2






30




33




8






D




Al


2


(OH)


3


Cl


2


(SO


4


)


0.5






70




50




15






E




Al


2


(OH)


3


Cl


3






50




33




10






F




Ferrous Chloride









28












(FeCl


2


)






G




Al


2


(OH)


2


Cl


4






30




40











H




Al


2


(OH)


3


Cl


3






55




40











I




Al


2


(OH)


3


SO


4


SiO


3






˜35 




˜35 





























Preferred














Description




Embodiment




C




D




E




H




G




B




I




F









Product




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/






Dilution




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms






Deionized






water/






product






Appearance




lt amber




lt amber




lt. amber




yellow




yellow




yellow




yellow




yellow




yellow






Use




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/






Concentation




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm






(mls/ppm)






E-coat




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/






Composition




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls






Deionized






water/






e-coat






waste






pH to 2.9




46 drops




37 drops




41 drops




38 drops




39 drops




39 drops




38 drops




38 drops




35 drops






pH to 8.5




105 drops




105 drops




131 drops




120 drops




106 drops




92 drops




100 drops




106 drops




106 drops






Floc




lg.




lg.




lg.




lg.




lg.




lg.




lg.




lg.




lg.






size/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/






appearance




clear




sl haze




sl haze




sl haze




sl haze




Sl haze




sl haze




sl haze




sl haze






Turbidity




18.5




35.7




29.0




34.9




52.4




35.3




33.4




36.6




53.9






Detackification




good




good




good




good




fair-good




fair-good




fair-good




good




fair-good






50 rpm:




90-95%




100%




90%




85%-90%




80-85%




80-85%




80-85%




85%




80-85%






100 rpm:




100%





100%




100%




100%




100%




100%




100%




100%






















TABLE 8











Table 8 illustrates the performance of the preferred






embodiment compared to the performance when substitutions of various






components are made in the same volume and concentration. The second






column shows the effect of the substitution of FeBr


3


for FeCl


3


. 4023-






8A, 4023-8C and 4023-8E show the results of the substitution of the






noted phosphorous compound for MAP. 4023-13A and 4023-13A show the






results of the substitution of the noted component for CaCl


2


.



















Preferred












Description




Embodiment




FeBr


3






NH


4


HPO


4






KH


2


PO


4






Na


2


HPO


4






MgCl


2






BaCl


2











Product Dilution




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/




7.5 gms/






Deionized water/




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms




2.5 gms






product






Appearance




med lt




very lt




reddish




dk




dk




med lt




med lt amber







amber




amber





reddish




reddish




amber






Use Concentation




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/




0.60 mls/






(mls/ppm)




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm




300 ppm






E-coat Composition




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/




495 mls/






Deionized water/




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls




5 mls






e-coat waste






pH to 2.9




38 drops




31 drops




42 drops




40 drops




49 drops




40 drops




48 drops






pH to 8.5




94 drops




28 drops




94 drops




103 drops




105 drops




92 drops




107 drops






Floc




lg.




lg.




lg.




lg.




lg.




med




med fluffy/






size/appearance




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




fluffy/




hazy







clear




sl cloudy




sl haze




hazy




hazy




clear






Turbidity




30




70




23.8




29.3




34.6




28.8




40.1






Detackification




good




good




good




fair




fair




good




fair-good






50 rpm:




80%




85%




90%




50%




75%




90%




80%






100 rpm:




100%




99%




100%




100%




100%




100%




100%













Claims
  • 1. A composition comprising the reaction product formed by the reaction of 3 to 30 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 40 wt % active FeCl3, 0.5 to 10 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 50 wt % (Al(H2PO4)3.XH2O), and 5 to 20 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 50 wt % Al2(OH)5Cl, wherein the reaction product has the following structure:Iron (III) salt of [Aln(OH)a(H2PO4)bClc(H2O)d]3n−a−b−c wherein a+b+c>3n; n, a, b, c and d are defined based on the relative amounts of reactants.
  • 2. The composition of claim 1 having an aluminum-27 NMR peak at ca. −26.2 ppm relative to aluminum oxide at 0 ppm.
  • 3. The composition of claim 1 further comprising the addition to the reaction product of CaCl2 and Epi-DMA polyamine.
  • 4. The composition of claim 1 further comprising the addition to the reaction product of p-DMDAAC.
  • 5. A composition according to claim 1 wherein the reaction product is the reaction of 10 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 40 wt % active FeCl3, 3 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 50 wt % (Al(H2PO4)3.XH2O), and 5 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 50 wt % Al2(OH)5Cl.
  • 6. A process for treating a solution comprising contacting an aqueous solution with an effective amount of the composition of claim 1.
  • 7. The process of claim 6 wherein the aqueous solution is selected from the group consisting of general wastewater, municipal wastewater, wastewater containing metals, papermaking wastewater, water containing organic compounds, water containing chemical compounds, water containing biological compounds, poultry processing waste, ink containing solutions, raw surface water, oil/water mixtures, colored solutions, coal waste, mineral processing water, oily waste, raw municipal drinking water, water containing suspended solids, water containing paint solids, electrolytic primer coating wastewater and industrial wastewater.
  • 8. The process for the production of a reaction product comprising reacting 3 to 30 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 40 wt % active FeCl3, 0.5 to 10 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 50 wt % (Al(H2PO4)3.XH2O), and 5 to 20 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 50 wt % Al2(OH)5Cl, wherein the reaction product has the following structure:Iron (III) salt of [Aln(OH)a(H2PO4)bClc(H2O)d]3n−a−b−c wherein a+b+c>3n; n, a, b, c and d are defined based on the relative amounts of reactants.
  • 9. The process of claim 8 further comprising adding to the reaction product, CaCl2 and Epi-DMA polyamine.
  • 10. The process of claim 8 further comprising adding to the reaction product, p-DMDAAC.
  • 11. The process of claim 8 comprising reacting 10 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 40 wt % active FeCl3, 3 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 50 wt % (Al(H2PO4)3.XH2O), and 5 parts by volume of an aqueous solution containing about 50 wt % Al2(OH)5Cl, and:the reaction product is diluted by 10 to 40% prior to the addition of p-DMDAAC.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority on U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 60/104,203 and 60/082,448 which were filed on Oct. 14, 1998 and Apr. 20, 1998, respectively.

US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
2550490 McDonald Apr 1951
3544476 Aiba et al. Dec 1970
3929666 Aiba et al. Dec 1975
4316810 Burnham Feb 1982
4362643 Kuo et al. Dec 1982
4507213 Daccord et al. Mar 1985
4566986 Waldmann Jan 1986
4582627 Carlsson Apr 1986
4655934 Rose et al. Apr 1987
4683217 Lok et al. Jul 1987
4746457 Hassick et al. Mar 1988
4800039 Hassick et al. Jan 1989
4902779 Waldmann Feb 1990
5035808 Hassick et al. Jul 1991
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Fair, et al. “Water and Wastewarter Engineering Vol. 2: Water Purification and Wastewater Disposal”, pp. 30-10 to 0-15, Wiley, New York, 1968 Month unknown.
T.H.Y. Tebbut “Principles of Water Quality Control. 2nd Ed.”, pp. 100-108, Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1977 Month unknown.
Charles R. O'Melia, Ph.D., “Water Treatment Plant Design for the Practicing Engineer”, Robert L. Sanks, Editor, Chapter 4, pp. 65-76, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1978 Month unknown.
Rip G. Rice, Ph.D. “Safe Drinking Water; The Impact of Chemicals on a Limited Resource”, pp. 22-23, Monograph, Drinking Water Res. Found., Alexandria, Va., 1985 Month unknown.
James M. Montgomery, “Water Treatment Principles and Design”, Consulting Engineers, Inc., pp. 122-23; John Wiley and Sons, New York, N. Y. 1985 Month unknown.
Robert B. Williams and Gordon L. Culp “Handbook of Public Water Systems”, pp. 46-52, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, N.Y., 1986 Month unknown.
Drink Water Health Effects Task Force, “Health Effects of Drinking Water Treatment Technologies”, pp. 83-85, Lewis Publisher, Inc., Chelsea, MI, 1989 Month unknown.
American Water Works Assoc., “Water Quality and Treatment: A Handbook of Community Water Supplies. 4th Ed.” pp. 285-292, McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y., 1990 Month unknown.
Dempsey et al., Polyaluminum Chloride and Alum Coagulation of Clay—Fulvic Acid Suspensions, Joun, AWWA, pp. 74-80, (Mar. 1965).
“Poly Aluminum Hydroxide Salts—Maximizing Performance Through Poly Aluminum Chemistry”, World Water & Environmental Engineering—Sep. 1997.
David A. Mortimer, “Synthetic Polyelectrolytes—A Review”, Polymer International, pp. 29-41, 1991 Month unknown.
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60/104203 Oct 1998 US
60/082448 Apr 1998 US