The novel technology relates generally to electrochemistry, and, more particularly, to an electrolyte system for an electrochemical cell.
The use of organic liquid electrolytes poses a challenge for further development of current lithium-ion battery technology due to the flammable liquid nature of the electrolyte that gives rise to safety problems, solvent leakage, and a tight electrochemical window. For these reasons, many lithium-ion conducting materials, such as polymer, polymer-gel, ionic liquid, and inorganic solids, have been investigated as alternative electrolytes for a lithium ion (Li-ion) battery. Among them, fast Li-ion conducting inorganic solid materials have been given attention as alternative candidates because of their advantages over liquid and polymer electrolytes such as their high Li-ion conductivity over 10−4 S/cm, their wide electrochemical window (0-7 V vs. Li+/Li0), and their good chemical stability with highly reducing and oxidizing electrodes.
For these reasons, many fast Li-ion conducting solids, such as sulfide glass, glass-ceramics, and oxy-sulfide glasses, have been developed. Due to their sulfurous character, they generally yield higher Li-ion conductivity than oxide compounds. However, they are generally very unstable in an air atmosphere, which gives rise to difficulty in handling. There are a few oxide compounds that yield high Li-ion conductivity up to 10−3 S/cm. These include the NASICON type: Li1.3Ti1.7Al0.3(PO4)3, Garnet type: Li7La3Zr2O12, and LLTO type: Li3xLa(2/3)-x( )(1/3)-2xTiO3 in this case.
Use of these fast Li-ion conducting solid materials as electrolytes has been intensively and extensively studied in the design of solid-state batteries that use a solid anode, cathode, and electrolyte. However, even with the high ionic conductive solid electrolytes, it has been a struggle to coax solid electrolyte battery to obtain similar specific capacity, rate capability, and cycle life to those of liquid electrolyte battery cells. One of common problems is that there is a large capacity decay after the first charge (or discharge) of the cell. Even at a very small current rate, the capacity and cycle life are limited.
Recent studies show that the major problems arise from the interfacing of a solid electrolyte with a solid electrode rather than simple the use of the solid electrolyte. To solve this problem, coating of ceramic on the surface of electrode particles has been performed to minimize the electrode/electrolyte interface resistance. However, the electrochemical performance has not been competitive to that of the cell in liquid electrolyte. Thus, there is a need for an improved electrolyte system for electrochemical cells. The present novel technology addresses this need.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the novel technology, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the novel technology is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the novel technology as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the novel technology relates.
Two problems with the above-described electrochemical cell designs remain to be addressed: 1) the coating materials are not soft enough to match the volume change of the electrode materials during Li insertion/extraction on discharge/charge of the cell; and 2) there may be an intrinsic problem of using an inorganic solid as the electrolyte for a Li-ion battery.
Following the above mentioned topic, the question is raised as to whether fast Li-ion conducting inorganic solids can work as an electrolyte if the interface problems are addressed and/or eliminated. Therefore, to minimize the problem of the solid electrolyte/solid electrode interface, the present novel technology relates to the addition of Li-ion conducting liquid between a solid electrode and a solid electrolyte. The use of liquid at the point of contact between a solid electrolyte and a solid electrode is also convenient to accommodate the volume change of electrode during Li insertion or extraction.
For relatively easy handling and synthesis, Li1.3Ti1.7Al0.3(PO4)3 was selected in one embodiment to be the a solid electrolyte. As Li-ion conducting liquid, LiPF6 in EC/DEC was selected as an organic electrolyte. With the use of Li1.3Ti1.7Al0.3(PO4)3 as a solid electrolyte and LiPF6 in EC/DEC as a liquid electrolyte, a stable electrochemical window is only 2.5-4.5 V vs. Li+/Li0. To remove any other side effects such as the decomposition of liquid and solid electrolyte, LiMn2O4 was chosen as the material for both positive and negative electrodes.
Preparation of Li1.3Ti1.7Al0.3(PO4)3 was modified as follows. A stoichiometric mixture of Li2CO3, Al2O3, TiO2 and (NH4)2PO4 was ground and heated in a platinum crucible at 300° C. for 2 hours and 900° C. for 2 h. The material was reground into fine powder using a ball mill for 2 hours by a wet milling process. The dried powder was reheated at 900° C. for 2 hours and then ball milled again for 5 h. The resultant milled powder was pressed into pellets. The pellets were fired at 1050° C. for 2 hours and cooled to room temp. The ionic conductivity of the prepared pellets was measured to be 1.03×10−3 S/cm.
Preparation of LiMn2O4 was accomplished as follows. A stoichiometric mixture of Li2CO3 and MnO4 was ground and heated at 350° C. for 2 hours and then heated at 850° C. for 24 hours, followed by natural cooling.
In the preparation of electrodes for an all-solid-state cell and a hybrid electrolyte cell, the LiMn2O4 was mixed with the solid electrolyte and carbon in a weight ratio of 25:25:3 by using agate mortar and pestle. For each electrode a symmetric cell ten mg of mixture was used.
After the electrolyte powder (20 mg) was pelletized under the 1.75 Tone inside the aluminum tube, 2 mg of liquid electrolyte was added between each electrode and electrolyte layers of all solid state symmetric cell of LiMn2O4/Li1.5Ti1.7Al0.5(PO4)3/LiMn2O4 in argon filled dry box. The electrode powders (10 mg) for each side were added to the pelletized electrolyte and liquid electrolyte layer then those were pressed together at 2 Tone into a three layered pellet of 6.4-mm-diameter. The experiment was performed under a hand pressure vise with stainless steel current collectors on both sides.
The electrodes 15 for the coin cell 10 were fabricated from a 70:20:10 (wt %) mixture of active material, carbon as the current conductor and polytetrafluoroethylene as binder. The mixture was rolled into thin sheets and punched into 7-mm-diameter circular disks as electrodes. The typical electrode mass and thickness were 5-10 mg and 0.03-0.08 mm. The electrochemical cells 10 were prepared in standard 2016 coin-cell hardware with lithium metal foil used as both the counter and reference electrodes. The electrode disks 15 and cells 10 were prepared in an argon glove box. The electrolyte 25 used was 1M LiPF6 in a 1:1 ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate.
The size of the semicircle reflects the interface resistance (RIR) between solid electrolyte particles or electrolyte/electrode particles. The total resistance (RSE+RIR) of the samples is therefore obtained from the right intercept of the semicircle with the real axis in the plots. The total conductivity (σt) of the cell 10 can be calculated from the measured total resistance (RSE+RIR) of the cell 10.
The impedance spectroscopy clearly shows that the total resistance of the cell 10 decreases as pressure increases. Both of the bulk and grain boundary resistances decrease at higher pressure. This is because higher pressure provides better contact between the solid electrolytes (reducing RSE) and between the electrolyte/electrode (reducing RIR).
During the charging process, Li-ion extracts from Li1-xMn2O4 in the cathode 30 and in the anode 35 Li-ion inserts into the Li1+xMn2O4. It is commonly known that there is a large interface resistance between the intercalation electrode 15 and solid electrolyte 25. As a result, two semicircle regions can be regarded as the resistances at Li2Mn2O4/SE and Mn2O4/SE interfaces. The increase in interface resistance during the first charge will be the likely cause of decrease of the capacity following discharge and charge of the cell 10.
The interface resistance between solid electrode 15 and solid electrolyte 25 is quite a challenge for the all-solid-state battery 10. Although they initially have good contact under high pressure, the volume change of the electrode during Li insertion/extraction on charging/discharging is a critical problem. To address this problem, many studies have been done on coating ceramic onto the surface of the electrode materials to solve this problem. However, their performance is not comparative with that of liquid electrolyte. Therefore, adding a very small amount of liquid 80, just enough to make good contact between the solid electrolyte/solid electrode 25,15 allows volume adjustment during cycling of the cell 70.
When 20 mg of solid electrolyte 75 and 10 mg of each electrode 15 are used, 2 mg of liquid electrolyte 80 is used between each electrode 15 and electrolyte 75, and the cell 70 is pressed under 1300 psi.
The size of the semicircle corresponding to the interface resistance decreases in the hybrid cell 70. In addition, the electrolyte resistance indicated by the left intercept of the semicircle with real axis also decreases to 80 ohm compared to 420 ohm of the solid electrolyte cell 10. So, total resistance decrease from 850 ohm to 110 ohm.
Even under high pressure, there will always be space between solid electrolyte particles 75, electrode 15 particles, and between solid electrolyte 25/solid electrodes 15 in general. The addition of liquid electrolyte 80 fills the gap between any of these solid particles. This can provide better Li-ion mobility in the hybrid cell 70.
Even though less than 10 wt % of liquid electrolyte 80 was used in the novel material, the cell 70 was tested to ensure that electrochemical performance arises from the hybrid electrolyte 45 (combination of solid 25 and liquid electrolyte 80) and not just from the liquid electrolyte 80. Thus, the hybrid electrolyte cell 70 was prepared with non-Li-ion conductive Al2O3 particles instead of using Li1.3Ti1.7Al0.3(PO4)3. Proper impedance data was indistinguishable over the noise. Further, the hybrid cell 70 could not be charged or discharged with Al2O3 even at very low current rate of 0.005 mA/cm2. This supports that the liquid electrolyte 80 typically doesn't penetrate the solid electrolyte pressed pellet 25 (the solid electrolyte material 25 may be present in the form of a solid body, plurality of particles, a plurality of particles formed into a green body, a plurality of particles sintered into a unitary body, or the like).
Both sides of electrodes 15 are LiMn2O4 as anode 35 and cathode 30. In liquid electrolyte 80, the electrode spinel LiMn2O4 gives rise to an electrode-electrolyte reaction. The electrode surface disproportionation reaction 2Mn3+=Mn2++Mn4+ results in dissolution of the Mn2+ from the electrode 15 into the electrolyte 80. This reaction, unless suppressed, gives an irreversible capacity loss of the electrode 15 and migration of the Mn2+ across the electrolyte 15 to the anode 35 during charge and blocks Li-ion insertion into the anode 35. This eventually leads to poor cycle life of the cell 90 using LiMn2O4 electrode 15.
In addition to poor cycle life, a large capacity loss between first charge and discharge is commonly observed in liquid electrolyte 80. This is also observed in
This shows the advantage of the use of the hybrid electrolyte 45 over pure solid electrolyte 25 and liquid electrolyte 80. Solid electrolyte 25 was used for the major electrolyte part to improve safety of batteries, and use liquid electrolyte 80 for minor part to provide better interface between solid electrode 15 and solid electrolyte 25. The smaller Li-ion conductivity of a solid electrolyte 25 compared to that of liquid 80 can be a problem for high current rate battery applications, but the hybrid system 45 combines the advantages of both to minimize current rate limitations.
Another advantage of the use of a hybrid electrolyte system 45 over the use of pure liquid electrolyte 80 is that this hybrid system 45 can behave as a self-safety device when sudden higher temperature is applied.
While the novel technology has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character. It is understood that the embodiments have been shown and described in the foregoing specification in satisfaction of the best mode and enablement requirements. It is understood that one of ordinary skill in the art could readily make a nigh-infinite number of insubstantial changes and modifications to the above-described embodiments and that it would be impractical to attempt to describe all such embodiment variations in the present specification. Accordingly, it is understood that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the novel technology are desired to be protected.
This application claims priority to co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/531,342 and 61/531,330, both filed on Sep. 6, 2011, and co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/531,822, filed on Sep. 7, 2011, and incorporates the same herein in their respective entireties.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61531342 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61531330 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61531822 | Sep 2011 | US |