The present embodiments relate generally to integrated circuits and specifically relate to improved input-output ESD protection.
An electro-static discharge (ESD) event can occur between any two bodies that are at different potentials. The ESD event may be initiated by a contact or an ionized ambient discharge or spark between two charged bodies, and can result in transfer of energy between the two charged bodies. For example, a person can become charged after walking on an electro-statically charged surface (or handling a charged object), and may then inadvertently transfer this charge to an electronic circuit by touching the circuit.
In some circumstances, ESD events can inflict serious damage to electronic circuits. For example, a catastrophic ESD event in an electronic circuit may cause a metal layer to melt, an oxide layer to fail, or a junction to break. Less serious ESD events can cause latent failures, which may not be catastrophic, but may compromise performance characteristics of the electronic circuit. Various solutions have been used to protect electronic circuits by diverting damaging discharges away from sensitive circuitry through specially designed circuits.
One commonly used ESD solution involves the use of NMOS transistor devices as snap-back devices. Snap-back behavior of the NMOS snap-back device involves the inherent bipolar n-p-n transistor formed by the n+ source and drain regions and the p− substrate of the NMOS device. When a high voltage (e.g., resulting from an ESD event) appears between the source and drain terminals of the NMOS device, the n-p-n transistor turns on and diverts the resulting high discharge current to the substrate, which in turn passes the discharge current to ground potential.
More recently, ESD protection circuits that include a diode clamp and an active clamp have been used. Although effective for protecting against many ESD events, conventional active clamp circuits may not sufficiently protect the integrated circuit during certain forced ESD events that are performed during ESD testing of the integrated circuit. Thus, there is a need for an improved ESD circuit that can provide more comprehensive ESD protection than conventional circuits.
The present embodiments are illustrated by way of example and are not intended to be limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings, where:
Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the drawing figures.
A method and apparatus for protecting an input/output (I/O) circuit against ESD events are disclosed. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth such as examples of specific components, circuits, and processes to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. Also, in the following description and for purposes of explanation, specific nomenclature is set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present embodiments. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details may not be required to practice the present embodiments. In other instances, well-known circuits and devices are shown in block diagram form to avoid obscuring the present disclosure. The term “coupled” as used herein means connected directly to or connected through one or more intervening components or circuits. Any of the signals provided over various buses described herein may be time-multiplexed with other signals and provided over one or more common buses. Additionally, the interconnection between circuit elements or software blocks may be shown as buses or as single signal lines. Each of the buses may alternatively be a single signal line, and each of the single signal lines may alternatively be buses, and a single line or bus might represent any one or more of myriad physical or logical mechanisms for communication between components. As another example, circuits described or depicted as including metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistors may alternatively be implemented using bipolar transistors or any other technology in which a signal-controlled current flow may be achieved. The present embodiments are not to be construed as limited to specific examples described herein but rather includes within its scope all embodiments defined by the appended claims.
An ESD protection circuit is disclosed that protects an integrated circuit (IC) device against ESD events in a more comprehensive manner than conventional techniques. The ESD protection circuit is coupled to I/O circuitry and various pads (or pins) of the IC device, and is configured to protect the I/O circuit from ESD events. More specifically, for some embodiments, the ESD circuit includes a diode clamp, a first active clamp circuit, and a second active clamp circuit. The diode clamp circuit is coupled to an I/O pad, a power supply pad, and a ground pad, and provides protection against a first set of ESD test scenarios. The first active clamp circuit is coupled to the I/O pad, the power supply pad, and the ground pad, and provides protection against ESD currents resulting from the application of a high positive voltage applied to the I/O pad with respect to the ground pad by clamping the I/O pad voltage without turning on the diode clamp circuit during the ESD event. The second active clamp circuit is coupled to the power supply pad and the ground pad, and provides protection against other ESD events.
For some embodiments, the ESD protection circuit is embedded within the IC device, which typically undergoes ESD testing before and/or after packaging. During the ESD testing, forced ESD events are imposed on the IC device to ensure the device's resilience against a variety of ESD events (e.g., simulating handling of the chip by people). More specifically, for ESD tests in which a high positive voltage spike is applied to the I/O pad with respect to the ground pad, the first active clamp circuit is configured to safely pass an ESD current to ground potential through a path separate from the diode clamp circuit, thereby precluding the I/O pad voltage from increasing to unacceptable levels that can damage the I/O circuit. In other forced ESD event scenarios, the diode clamp circuit and/or the second clamp circuit may be used to safely discharge ESD currents to ground potential, as discussed in more detail below.
The active clamp 320 includes a CMOS inverter formed by a PMOS transistor M1 and an NMOS transistor M2, a bias resistor R2, a bias capacitor C1, an NMOS transistor M3, and a diode D3. Resistor R2 and capacitor C1 are connected in series between VDD pad 340 and ground pad 330, and are coupled to each other at a node N4. Transistors M1 and M2 are connected in series between VDD pad 340 and ground pad 330, and have gate terminals jointly connected to node N4. Drain terminals of transistors M1 and M2 are connected to a node N5, which in turn is connected to a gate terminal of transistor M3. Transistor M3 is coupled between VDD pad 340 and ground GND.
In normal operation of circuit 300, capacitor C1 is charged through resistor R2 towards VDD. When the voltage at node N4 reaches the threshold voltage of NMOS transistor M2, transistor M2 turns on and pulls the gate of transistor M3 low towards ground potential, thereby maintaining transistor M3 in a non-conductive state. Transistor M1 remains non-conductive as long as the voltage level at its source terminal does not exceed VDD by a threshold voltage VT1 of transistor M1. Diode D3 is non-conductive, and typically turns on only during a negative ESD event, as described in more detail below.
During an ESD testing of an IC device within which ESD circuit 300 is implemented (e.g., IC device 100 of
During a positive zapping of I/O pad 150 with respect to VDD pad 340, a high positive voltage differential is applied between VDD pad 340 and I/O pad 150 (e.g., such that the voltage of I/O pad 150 is several kV greater than the voltage of VDD pad 340), diode D2 diverts the resulting ESD current from I/O pad 150 to ground GND.
During a negative zapping of I/O pad 150 with respect to VDD pad 340, diode D2 remains off, and diode D1 turns on to conduct the corresponding ESD current to ground GND.
During a positive zapping of VDD pad 340 with respect to ground pad 330, none of the diodes D1-D3 are not conducting, and active clamp 322 conducts the corresponding ESD current to ground GND. More specifically, the positive VDD pad 340 with respect to ground pulls the source of transistor M1 towards VDD causing transistor M1 to conduct, thereby turning on transistor M3. As a result, M3 provides a path from VDD pad 150 to GND.
During a negative zapping of VDD pad 340 with respect to ground pad 330, diodes D1 and D2 remain non-conductive, and diode D3 turns on to provide a path for the corresponding ESD current to ground GND.
During a positive zapping of I/O pad 150 with respect to ground pad 330, diode D2 turns on and conducts the ESD current to ground GND through portion 322 of the ESD circuit 300. More specifically, transistor M1 turns on and pulls the gate of transistor M3 high towards VDD, thereby turning on transistor M3. As a result, transistor M3 provides a path from I/O pad 150 to ground GND via diode D2 for the ESD current. Transistor M3 is typically sized to conduct a maximum surge current (e.g., 1.5 Amps) while maintaining a limited voltage drop (e.g., 2 V) across its drain-source terminals. Accordingly, the potential at node N1 is clamped to a potential V1=V2+V3, where V2 is the voltage drop across the conduction diode D2 (e.g., 0.7 V) and V3 is the voltage drop across the drain and source terminals of transistor M3 (e.g., 2 V). Unfortunately, the resulting potential at node N1 may not be acceptable because it may cause damage to the I/O circuit 120.
Thus, although effective in protecting the I/O circuit 120 during many test scenarios, ESD circuit 300 may fail to adequately protect the I/O circuit 120 during a positive zapping of I/O pad 150 with respect to ground pad 330. The deficiencies of ESD circuit 300 in protecting the I/O circuit 120 from ESD currents resulting from the positive zapping of I/O pad 150 with respect to ground pad 330 are remedied by the ESD circuits configured in accordance with the present embodiments.
The driver circuit 425 selectively drives transistor M6 into saturation (or alternatively into the active region if transistor M6 is a bipolar transistor) in response to various voltage differential applied to the pads 150, 330, and 340. When driven by driver circuit 425, transistor M6 can conduct a relatively large surge current (e.g., 1.5 Amps) while maintaining a limited voltage drop (e.g., 2 V) across its drain and source regions. For example, when VDD pad 340 is floating, the voltage across capacitor C2 drops to nearly zero because there is no other path for any non-transient current to charge this capacitor, thereby pulling node N7 low toward ground potential. In response thereto, transistor M5 remains off, and transistor M4 turns on to pull node N8 high towards node N1. The high voltage at node N8 turns transistor M6 on, thereby providing a discharge path between I/O pad 150 and ground potential.
Conversely, when VDD pad 340 is connected to a supply voltage (e.g., during normal operation of the IC device within which ESD circuit 400 is implemented), the capacitor C2 charges node N7 high towards VDD via resistor R3, thereby turning on transistor M5 and turning off transistor M4. The conductive state of transistor M5 pulls the gate of transistor M6 low towards ground potential, thereby maintaining transistor M6 in a non-conductive state.
Now consider the scenario of positive zapping of I/O pad 150 with respect to ground pad 330, for which conventional active clamp 320 of
Accordingly, in contrast to the active clamp 320 of
In normal operation, when VDD pad 340 is connected to a power supply, as described above, the capacitor C2 is charged toward VDD and almost turns on transistor M5. However, unless the source terminal of transistor M4 (i.e., node N1) is driven to a level of VT4+VDD, where VT4 is the threshold voltage of transistor M4, transistor M4 does not turn on, and therefore, no current will pass through any of the transistors M4, M5, and M6. The impedance of active clamp 420 seen from node N1 is in the order of leakage resistance of transistor M6. Therefore, during normal operation, active clamp 420 does not load the I/O circuit 120, which is indeed a desirable feature of ESD circuit 400.
In the foregoing specification, the present embodiments have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.
This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of the co-pending and commonly owned U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/452,303 entitled “INPUT-OUTPUT ESD PROTECTION” filed on Mar. 14, 2011, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61452303 | Mar 2011 | US |