Patent Application
20160073622
The present invention relates to devices and methods to control insects, in particular, a bait station and its use for insect control.
In some embodiments, the invention provides a bait station comprising a housing that comprises a flexible portion. A composition is contained on or in the housing and comprises at least one sugar and at least one toxin. An insert is coupled to the housing and at least one olfactory attractant is contained in the insert.
In other embodiments, the invention provides a composition comprising at least one sugar and at least one toxin. The sugar is selected from the group consisting of sucrose, glucose, fructose, galactose, dextrose, and lactose. The toxin is selected from the group consisting of spinosad, neonicotinoid, carbamate, organophosphate, organochlorine, pyrethrum, pyrethrin, pyrethroid, chlofenapyr, ethiprole, sulfoxoflor, pyriproxyfen, and boric acid.
In at least one embodiment, the invention provides a composition comprising by weight 8%-15% sucrose, 0.003%-1.0% spinosad, 0.0625%-0.5% linalool, 0.0938%-0.75% 1-hexanol, and 0.2188%-1.75% phenylacetaldehyde.
In at least one embodiment, the invention provides a method for manufacturing a bait station that comprises providing a housing that comprises a flexible portion and applying a composition to the housing. The composition comprises at least one sugar and at least one toxin. The method further comprises providing an insert, placing at least one olfactory attractant in the insert, and coupling the insert to the housing.
In at least one embodiment, the invention provides a method for controlling insects that comprises applying an effective amount of the composition of at least one of claims 21-35 to a bait station, and exposing a population to the bait station.
a shows representative release profiles of hexanol suspended in hexane or mineral oil and applied to nylon sock or cotton wick.
b shows representative release profiles of phenylacetaldehyde suspended in hexane or mineral oil and applied to nylon sock or cotton wick.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the figures. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
Devices and Methods
The panel 14 provides a substantial surface area and may be constructed from one more layers of fabric made up of any suitable natural or synthetic fibers. The panel 14 may be flexible, rigid, or have portions that are flexible and portions that are rigid. For example, the fabric may be constructed from materials such as, among others, jute, natural waxes, pectin, sugars, cellulose, protein, or organic polymers, such that the resulting fabric absorbs and retains the sugars/toxin solution and is capable of displaying a visual image or pattern. The panel 14 may also contain natural cotton, linen, flax, wool, or any combination thereof. The fabric is constructed to be strong and durable and, therefore, resilient to withstand inclement or harsh environmental conditions for, in some embodiments, at least six months at a time. In addition to the sugar/toxin solution, which will be discussed in greater detail below, the fabric may also include substances that prevent biological degradation through preservative antimicrobial, anti-fungal, and/or anti-mold products. Additionally, the fabric may include protection against ultraviolet (UV) radiation.
The sugar/toxin solution may be applied to the bait station 10 in any suitable way. For example, the solution may be sprayed onto the fabric, or alternatively, the fabric may be soaked in or impregnated with the solution. Once applied, the fabric dries such that the solution becomes embedded into the fabric. In other embodiments, the solution is applied (e.g., sprayed onto) the panel 14, and the panel 14 is kept slightly damp or moist. For example, in some embodiments, the solution is reapplied to the panel 14 at regular intervals such that the panel 14 is also more damp, and therefore, appealing to insects. Additionally, the housing panel 14 can include a wetting agent or mechanism to keep the panels 14 damp, which will be described in greater detail below.
Alternatively, the solution may be dried or embedded into the fabric of the panel 14, and the panel 14 kept moist using additional solution or any suitable moistening solution. For example, the fabric of the panel 14 is treated using an immersion and padding application process. In particular, the fabric can be submerged in the liquid solution of a chemical, which will be described in greater detail below, until the fabric has absorbed as much liquid as possible. Excess liquid is then removed from the fabric using a textile application process known as padding. Excess liquid is returned to the applicator to reduce waste. The padding process produces uniformly treated materials that are consistent within and between devices. Typically, the treated devices can be tumble dried.
Certain embodiments disclosed herein use the concept that mosquitoes will actually feed on a surface that contains sugar even if that surface is dry. The disclosed data establishes this dry feeding behavior. For example, the fabrics of the present device can be dried after being impregnated with the sugar/toxin solution. Such a device can be used to control mosquitoes in a dry or humid environment, or an environment without any source of water.
In other embodiments disclosed herein, the bait station includes a wetting agent or mechanism (such as an insert), which provides a way to capture moisture proximate to the bait station to enhance its effectiveness because mosquitoes are more likely to feed in areas with higher local moisture. The embodiments accomplish this by integrating silicon beads or a superabsorbent material into the fabric of the bait station. In some embodiments, the present device can be constructed with dry fabric surfaces impregnated with the sugar/toxin solution and shipped to a location where insect control is needed. At such location, the present device either can be used with the dry fabric surface (i.e., no further construction or processing is needed) or can be used after the surface is dampened or moistened.
In several embodiments, the dried fabric that results from the immersion and padding application process may also be used with an insert or high moisture insert 16 (
In another embodiment of the invention, the bait station can include a container 400 that contains a suitable composition to provide moisture. For example, the composition may be a gel formed with a superabsorbent material. In one such embodiment, the container 400 may be included with the bait station, as illustrated in
In another embodiment of the invention, the bait station can include a wicking mechanism 418. The wicking mechanism 418 may include components of the container 400 and may be incorporated into the bait station in the same way as the container 400, as illustrated in
Further with respect to
The panel 14 also may include one or more conduits or channels 22. In the embodiment illustrated in
Further with respect to
The tube 26 provides a reservoir that has a small evaporative surface such that the tube 26 delivers the olfactory attractant to opposite ends of the tube 26 and/or along the length of the tube 26. The use of the tube 26 to house the olfactory attractant reduces point source emission of attractant and allows for distribution of attractant or release along the length of the tube 26 and/or release of attractant at each end of the tube 26. In some embodiments, the reservoir provided by the tube 26 ensures a slow release and stability of the attractant or attractants contained therein for a target of at least six months. The tube 26 may be refillable and, therefore, reusable. Alternatively, the tube 26 may be disposable once the olfactory attractant has substantially evaporated. Additionally, the bait station 10 may employ one or more than one olfactory attractant. In other words, each conduit 22 may house a tube 26 having the same or different olfactory attractants. This feature is especially advantageous. For example, mixtures of attractants are sometimes more effective than individual attractants. Direct mixing of attractants can often result, however, in chemical reactions that may form undesirable isomers or derivatives. Therefore, having more than two or more attractants available and unmixed is beneficial.
The housing 130 is configured such that the opening 134 extending through the housing provides an area that avoids light, including interior artificial lighting or sunlight. At least one of the panels 114 may include a visual attractant 118, as discussed in detail above with respect to
Further with respect to
Further with respect to
Further with respect to
Further with respect to
As illustrated in
In other embodiments, the additional panel 424 may include one piece or section (not illustrated) of material (e.g., similar to one portion 428 of the sleeve 426). The one piece of material may be attached to the outside or to the inside of the panel 114 by any of the methods described above. In other embodiments, one piece of material may be attached to both the outside and to the inside of the panel 114.
The additional panels 424 may be removed and added to the bait station 110 as necessary. The additional panels 424 may be attached to the panel 114 in any functional way, including the ways as described above for the sleeve 426. Accordingly, the additional panels 424 allow for a user to easily swap out older additional panels 424 for new additional panels 424. By removing older additional panels 424 and replacing them with new additional panels 424, the user may be resupplying the bait station 110 with different components, including, for example, a different concentration of sugar, a different concentration of toxin, a different concentration of olfactory attractants, a different concentration of moisture, among other benefits, without having to replace the entire bait station 110.
Although the additional panel 424 is only shown as being coupled to the bait station 110 illustrated in
Further with respect to
As briefly discussed above, the bait station may include a container 400, which may be positioned anywhere suitable on or in the bait station. Specifically, the container 400 is easily incorporated into the bait station 110, as described in detail below. Furthermore, the container 400 may be any suitable color to provide a visual attractant in combination with the visual attractant described above. For example, the container 400 may be black.
In a first embodiment of the container 400, illustrated in
In a second embodiment of the container 400, illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The contents 404 of the container 400 may include any suitable composition that provides moisture. In one embodiment, the contents 404 may simply be water. In another embodiment, the contents 404 may include a SAP as described above. In particular, a composition of the contents 404 may include a gel formed by the superabsorbent polymer after being hydrated in an aqueous medium. In addition to the agent providing moisture (e.g., a gel formed by a SAP), the composition of the contents 404 may include other agents, such as a sugar, a toxin, a preservative, or an olfactory attractant as described below, or any combination thereof. For example, the composition of the contents 404 may include a gel, a combination of a gel and a sugar, a combination of a gel, a sugar, and a toxin, a combination of a gel, a sugar, a toxin, and a preservative, a combination of a gel, a sugar, a toxin, and an olfactory attractant, or a combination of a gel, a sugar, a toxin, an olfactory attractant, and a preservative. The contents 404 may be wetted periodically, while in use, to further attract mosquitoes, as described above. In some embodiments, the contents 404 may include a sugar, as described in greater detail below, to provide a feeding medium for the mosquitoes to directly feed upon. Further, the contents 404 may include a toxin, as described in greater detail below, in addition to the sugar to provide an effective means to control mosquitoes upon the mosquitoes' feeding on the contents 404.
Suitable superabsorbent polymers for the contents 404 are explained in further detail above. For example, the composition of the contents 404 may contain, on a dry weight basis, one unit of a polyacrylate polymer, which is allowed to absorb and retain 200 or 300 units of an aqueous liquid.
Suitable sugars for the contents 404 include glucose, fructose, galactose, sucrose, dextrose, lactose, and other sugars described below. Typically, the composition of the contents 404 contains from about 10% wt to about 60% wt of a sugar, such as from about 10% wt to about 50% wt, from about 10% wt to about 40% wt, or from about 10% wt to about 30% wt. In other embodiments, the composition of the contents 404 contains from about 5% wt to about 95% wt of a sugar, from about 10% wt to about 90% wt of a sugar, from about 10% wt to about 80% wt of a sugar, or from about 10% wt to about 70% wt of a sugar. In some embodiments, water may evaporate from the composition and the concentration of the sugar may increase without affecting the effectiveness of the present device.
Suitable toxins for the contents 404 include spinosad and other toxins described below. Typically, the composition of the contents 404 contains from about 0.01% wt to about 5.0% wt of a toxin, such as from about 0.02% wt to about 4.0% wt, from about 0.03% wt to about 3.0% wt, from about 0.04% wt to about 2.0% wt, or from 0.05% wt to about 1.0% wt. In some embodiments, the composition of the contents 404 contains from about 0.05% wt to about 1.0% wt of a toxin.
Optionally, the contents 404 include may include one or both of a preservative and an olfactory attractant. Suitable preservative include MBS 2550 (a preservative to control bacteria and fungi), among other things. Suitable olfactory attractants for the contents 404 include volatile organic compounds, such as the three-part blend of linalool, 1-hexanol, and phenylacetaldehyde at a ratio of approximately 2:3:7 (linalool:1-hexanol:phenylacetaldehyde) described below.
In a particular embodiment, the composition of the contents 404 contains a polyacrylate polymer at 0.33% weight; sucrose at 10% weight; spinosad as toxin at 1% weight, the balance being water. In another embodiment, the composition of the contents 404 is prepared by mixing 100 grams of a polyacrylate polymer with 20 kg of a liquid containing 20% weight of a sugar, 0.2% weight spinosad, 0.2% weight of a preservative, and 79.6% weight of water. Additional polymer may be added to alter the desired consistency of the contents 404.
Typically, the composition for the contents 404 can be prepared by dissolving sugar in an appropriate quantity of water, adding spinosad while mixing, then adding the SAP while mixing.
In addition to the container 400, the contents 404 may be secured in the pouch 115 in addition to or as an alternative to the insert 16. The contents 404 may contain any combination of the components listed above and below, such that an additional container 400 may not be necessary. For example, the bait station 110 may include the contents 404 in a plurality of the pouches 115, and the container 400 may or may not be used in addition to the contents 404 secured in the pouches 115. In a similar embodiment, the contents 404 may be wrapped by the wrapping material 414 and then secured in the pouches 115 to provide a slower diffusion of moisture into and out of the bait station. As explained above, small holes and/or cuts may be made in the wrapping material 414 to enhance diffusion.
Similar to the bait station 110, the container 400 may be capable of assuming at least two positions: a first configuration for operation with the bait station, and a second configuration for shipment and storage of the containers 400. As illustrated in
The wick 420 includes a first end 421 and a second end 423. The wick 420 generally extends from the contents 404 of the bowl 406 (e.g., from the second end 423 of the wick 420) through the slot 422 of the cover 416 and into the opening 134 of the bait station 110 (e.g., to the first end 421 of the wick 420) to provide the bait station 110 with moisture. The wick 420 is configured to provide moisture to the bait station 110 through capillary action (e.g., water flows from the end of the wick 420 within the bowl 406 to the end of the wick 420 in the opening 134). The second end 423 of the wick 420, positioned within the bowl 406, may extend to the bottom wall 408 of the bowl 406 such that any moisture within the bowl 406 may be eventually absorbed by the wick 420. The first end 421 of the wick 420 may extend any functional distance beyond the slot 422 of the cover 416 into the opening 134 of the bait station 110. The wick 420 may be composed of a nonwoven material such as rayon, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), or polypropylene (PP), among other nonwoven materials. In other embodiments, the wick 420 may be composed of a fabric or some other functional, wettable material.
The wicking mechanism 418 may be placed in any functional position on or in the bait station 110. As similarly described above for the container 400, the wicking mechanism 418 may be placed on the landing surface 138, within the opening 134 of the bait station 110. Alternatively, as illustrated in
The housing 230 is configured such that the opening 234 extending through the housing provides an area that avoids light, including interior light and light from the sun. At least one of the panels 214 may include a visual attractant 218, as discussed in detail above with respect to
Further with respect to
In the embodiment of
In use, the bait stations 10, 110, 210 of
When the bait stations 10, 110, and 210 are in use, the olfactory attractant contained in the tubes 26 and optionally the visual attractants 18, 118, 218 entice the insects to land on the panel 14 or in the opening 134, 234 of the housing 130, 230, which includes the sugar/toxin solution. The insects draw sugar from the panels 14, 114, or 214 and, in doing so, ingest any toxins that are incorporated in the solution. The toxins terminate the insects thereby preventing them from afflicting the native population.
As discussed above, the bait stations 10, 110, 210 discussed herein are easy to ship and assemble. Because the bait stations 10, 110, 210 are constructed from fabric, they may be folded and substantially flattened such that they may be shipped in bulk. The tubes 26 may be shipped together with or separately from the bait stations 10, 110, or 210. Once on site, the bait stations 10, 110, and 210 may be assembled by inserting the tubes into the conduits 22, 122, or 222 and suspended or placed appropriately.
Although not necessary for use with the bait stations 10, 110, 210,
The drum 350 is generally cylindrical in shape and includes a top 354, a bottom 358 spaced from the top by a height H, a side 362 extending from the top 354 to the bottom 358, and a cavity 366 defined within. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The drum 350 is oriented in relation to the bait stations 10, 110, 210 so that the longitudinal axis of the drum is perpendicular, parallel, or at an oblique angle to the longitudinal axis A in
As assembled, the bait stations 10,110, 210 are hung from the monofilament line that is tied to one or both of the handles 370. The bait stations 10, 110, 210 are lowered into the cavity 366 of the drum 350 and allowed to hang, suspended within. The member 378 is screwed onto the hole 374 of the top 354, making the only access points to the bait station the openings 382 on the side 362 of the drum 350. Therefore, the drum 350 provides an area that avoids light.
In other embodiments, the drum 350 and the bait stations 10, 110, 210 may be constructed as a single structure. For example, the housing of the bait stations 10, 110, 210 may be formed as one piece with one or more of the first end, the second end, or the side. In one such embodiment, the interior of the side 362 may include fabric soaked in the sugar/toxin solution, such that the drum 350 forms in whole or in part the structure of the bait station. The amount of the side 362 covered by the fabric may include any functional amount. This embodiment would also allow a bait station 10, 110, 210, or a plurality of bait stations 10, 110, 210, to be situated within the cavity 366 in addition to the fabric covering the interior. The interior of the top 354 and the bottom 358 may also be covered in the fabric soaked in the sugar/toxin solution in addition to the side 362, or independently from the side 362. In another embodiment, the bait station 10, 110, 210 and the drum 350 may be constructed in a similar fashion as described above, but not including the monofilament line. Rather, the bait station 10, 110, 210, or a plurality of bait stations 10, 110, 210 would be constructed as a part of the drum 350 and would be hung or situated within the cavity 366 in any suitable fashion. In these embodiments, tube recesses may also be present throughout the drum to provide locations for the tubes 26 including the olfactory attractant. In other embodiments, the olfactory attractant may be provided directly to the interior of the drum 350, such as with the fabric covering the interior of the side 362.
Water can be supplied to the bottom 358 of the drum 350 to provide humidity to the cavity 366 and to the bait stations 10, 110, 210 to further attract insects. In some embodiments, a wick or porous material (not shown) may extend between the bait stations 10, 110, 210 and the water such that water is guided by absorption to the bait stations 10, 110, 210 by capillary action. Floral scents or wetted pads may be provided to the bottom 358 of the drum 350 instead of, or in addition to the water. As similarly described above, deterring material may also be provided in places of the drum 350 or the monofilament line to prevent ants from reaching the bait stations 10, 110, 210. Together, the black drum 350 and the water provide visual attraction supplemented with locally elevated humidity, and the station 10, 110, 210 positioned within the cavity provides the floral scents as well as the sugar/toxin solution in the fabric. Other visual cues can be used in conjunction with the black drum 350 to further enhance the attractiveness of the bait station.
Composition of Sugar/Toxin Solution
The sugar/toxin solution is a composition that is applied to at least a portion of the bait station and that comprises one or more sugars and one or more toxins. In some embodiments, the composition may also comprise one or more attractant.
Sugars
As used herein, sugars shall mean any carbohydrate that induces sugar foraging behavior in an insect. Sugars include, but are not limited to, glucose, fructose, galactose, sucrose, dextrose, and lactose. The sugar/toxin solution may include more than one sugar. The sugars may be present in any ratio. A preferred embodiment includes the use of unrefined sugar.
Toxins
As used herein, “toxin” is a compound or composition that kills or controls insects at some stage of life and includes, for example, larvacides and adulticides. An insect population may be controlled by applying the toxin in an amount sufficient to kill or control at least 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or any proportion of the population. Control or controlling includes killing, knocking down, or a combination thereof, of at least a portion of a population of insects. A population includes at least two such insects. In some embodiments, the toxin includes, but is not limited to, spinosad, neonicotinoid, carbamate, organophosphate, organochlorine, pyrethrum, pyrethrin, pyrethroid, chlorfenapyr, ethiprole, sulfoxoflor, pyriproxyfen, boric acid, or any combination thereof. The sugar/toxin solution may include more than one toxin. The toxins may be present in any ratio.
Spinosad
Spinosad is an insecticide derived from Saccharopolyspora spinosa. S. spinosa occurs in over 20 natural forms, and over 200 synthetic forms (spinosoids). As used in this specification, spinosad includes at least one of Spinosyn A, Spinosyn D, or a combination thereof. Suitable spinosad formulation includes liquid soluble concentrate (SC) and solid water dispersible granule (WDG). Commercial spinosad insecticide products include those supplied by Dow AgroSciences (Indianapolis, Ind.), such as spinosad (mixture of Spinosyn A and Spinosyn D) under trade names Entrust® (wettable powder), Entrust® SC, and Tracer®, and spinetoram (mixture of 3′-O-ethyl-5,6-dihydro Spinosyn J (CAS No. 187166-40-1) and 3′-O-ethyl Spinosyn L (CAS No. 187166-15-0)) under trade names Delegate® WG, Radiant® SC, and Exalt™ SC.
Neonicotinoids
Neonicotinoids are insecticides that act on the central nervous system of insects. Neonicotinoids include, but are not limited to, acetamiprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, thiacloprid, and thiamethoxam.
Carbamates
Carbamates are organic compounds derived from carbamic acid (NH2COOH) and feature the carbamate ester functional group. Carbamates include, but are not limited to, aldicarb, alanycarb, bendiocarb, benfuracarb, butocarboxim, butoxycarboxim, carbaryl, carbofuran, carbosulfan, ethiofencarb, fenobucarb, formetanate, furathiocarb, isoprocarb, methiocarb, methomyl, metolcarb, oxamyl, pirimicarb, propoxur, thiodicarb, thiofanox, trimethacarb, XMC, xylylcarb, and triazamate.
Organophosphates
Organophosphates are esters of phosphoric acid that act on the enzyme acetylcholinesterase. Organophosphates include, but are not limited to, acephate, azamethiphos, azinphos-ethyl, azinphos-methyl, chlorethoxyfos, chlorfenvinphos, chlormephos, chlorpyrifos, methyl chlorpyrifos, coumaphos, cyanophos, demeton-S-methyl, diazinon, dichlorvos/DDVP, dicrotophos, dimethoate, dimethylvinphos, disulfoton, EPN, ethion, ethoprophos, famphur, fenamiphos, fenitrothion, fenthion, flupyrazophos, fosthiazate, heptenophos, isoxathion, malathion, mecarbam, methamidophos, methidathion, mevinphos, monocrotophos, omethoate, oxydemeton-methyl, parathion, methyl parathion, phenthoate, phorate, phosalone, phosmet, phosphamidon, phoxim, pirimiphos-methyl, profenofos, propetamphos, prothiofos, pyraclofos, pyridaphenthion, quinalphos, sulfotep, tebupirimfos, temephos, terbufos, tetrachlorvinphos, thiometon, triazophos, trichlorfon, and vamidothion.
Organochlorines
Organochlorines are organic compounds containing at least one covalently bonded chlorine atom. Organochlorines include, but are not limited to, phthalimides, sulfamides, and chloronitriles, including, but not limited to, anilazine, captan, chlorothalonil, captafol, chlordane, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), dicofol, dichlofluanid, dichlorophen, endosulfan, flusulfamide, folpet, hexachlorobenzene, heptachlor, pentachlorphenol and its salts, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, mirex, phthalide, and tolylfluanid, N-(4-chloro-2-nitro-phenyl)-N-ethyl-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide.
Pyrethrum and Pyrethrins
As used in this specification, the term “pyrethrum” refers to a crude extract composition that is derived from chrysanthemum-like flowers primarily grown in Kenya, Tanzania, and Australia (e.g., T. cinerariaefolium, C. cinerariaefolium, and C. coccineum) and comprises a mixture of the naturally occurring insecticidal ester compounds known as the “pyrethrins,” as further detailed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/175,405, filed Jul. 1, 2011, published as U.S. Patent Publication No. 2013/0005688 A1 on Jan. 3, 2013, which is incorporated into this specification by reference in its entirety. “Pyrethrins” or “pyrethrin ester” is used in this specification as a collective term given to any combination of the six ester compounds (including refined pyrethrum) detailed in Table 1. While the terms “pyrethrins” and “pyrethrum” are sometimes used interchangeably, “pyrethrum” should be understood here to encompass crude extracts that contain pyrethrins. The pyrethrins in any given pyrethrum extract vary in relative amount, depending on factors such as the plant variety, where it is grown, and the time of harvest. Pyrethrins are commercially available from several sources throughout the world and, in the United States, are available from several sources including the product sold under the trade name Pyganic® MUP 20 by MGK (Minneapolis, Minn.). Pyganic® MUP 20 contains about 20% pyrethrins by weight. When the term “MUP 20” is used it refers to a MUP comprising about 20% pyrethrins by weight and includes, but is not limited to, Pyganic® MUP 20.
Pyrethroid
The term “pyrethroid” is understood in the art to mean one or more synthetic compounds that act as an insecticide and are adapted from the chemical structure of pyrethrins. Non-limiting examples of pyrethroids include acrinathrin, allethrin, benfluthrin, benzylnorthrin, bioallethrin, bioethanomethrin, bioresmethrin, bifenthrin, cyclethin, cycloprothrin, cyfluthrin, beta-cyfluthrin, gamma-cyhalothrin, lamdba-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, alpha-cypermethrin, beta-cypermethrin, zeta-cypermethrin, cyphenothrin, deltamethrin, empenthrin, esbiothrin, esfenvalerate, etofenprox, fenfluthrin, fenpropathrin, fenvalerate, flucythrinate, flumethrin, imiprothin, isopyrethrin I, kadethrin, metofluthrin, permethrin, 1RS cis-permethrin, phenothrin, prallethrin, resmethrin, silafluofen, sumithrin (d-phenothrin), tau-fluvalinate, tefluthrin, tetramethrin, tralomethrin, transfluthrin, and isomers of these compounds. In certain embodiments, the pyrethroid comprises at least one of permethrin, sumithrin, prallethrin, resmethrin, etofenprox, allethrin, alpha-cypermethrin, bifenthrin beta-cypermethrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, esfenvalerate, etofenprox, lamdba-cyhalothrin, and zeta-cypermethrin, which may be used with, for example, perilla oil, perillaldehyde, or carvone.
Additional information regarding pyrethrum, pyrethrins, and pyrethroids can be found in various references, reviews, and fact sheets, for example, Pyrethrum Flowers: Production, Chemistry, Toxicology, and Uses. John E. Casida and Gary B. Quistad (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1995; and “Pyrethrins & Pyrethroids” 1998 Fact Sheet published by the National Pesticide Telecommunications Network (NPTN) at Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oreg.
The sugar and the toxin can be present at any weight ratio suitable for both inducing sugar foraging behavior and controlling the insect. In some embodiments, the toxin or sugar can be present in an amount of at least about 0.003%, at least about 0.01%, at least about 0.05%, at least about 0.1%, at least about 0.5%, at least about 1%, at least about 2%, or at least about 3%, at least about 4%, at least about 6%, at least about 8%, at least about 10%, at least about 12%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 50% or at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and less than about 95%, less than about 90%, less than about 80%, less than about 75%, less than about 70%, less than about 65%, less than about 60%, less than about 55%, less than about 50%, less than about 45%, less than about 35%, less than about 30%, less than about 25%, less than about 20%, less than about 15%, less than about 10%, less than about 5%, less than about 2.5%, less than about 2%, less than about 1%, less than about 0.5%, or less than about 0.1% by weight of the sugar/toxin solution.
Preferably, the sugar used in the present device comprises sucrose, and the toxin used in the present device comprises spinosad, such as the commercially available spinosad products (Entrust®, Entrust® SC, and Tracer®) and spinetoram products (Delegate® WG, Radiant® SC, and Exalt™ SC). In some embodiments, technical grade spinosad is used. Typically, the sugar/toxin solution is prepared by dissolving the sugar and the toxin at a pre-determined ratio in a solvent. Preferably, the concentration of sugar in that solution is approximately 10%, and the concentration of spinosad in that solution is between 0.003%-1.0%. Suitable solvents include acetone. Other components of the solution can include suitable components such as an antibactericide, a mold inhibitor, and a UV-protectant.
Attractants
As used herein, “attractant” is a compound, composition, or element that attracts insects to a site. Attractants may include, but are not limited to, a bacterium capable of producing nonanoic acid, tetradecanoic acid, or methyl tetradecanoate; Bacillus thuringiensis; Lactococcus lactis; Klebsiella oxytoca; Shigella dysenteriae; Brevundimonas vesicularis; a supernatant of a culture of any of the aforementioned bacteria; nonanoic acid; tetradecanoic acid; or methyl tetradecanoate, or any combination thereof. Attractants of this variety are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/613,920, filed Nov. 6, 2009, published as U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0192451 A1 on Aug. 5, 2010, which is incorporated into this specification by reference in its entirety. Attractants may include visual or olfactory or other sensory attractants. Additional examples of attractants include, but are not limited to, designs, images, light, carbon dioxide, sugars, sugary scents, lactic acid, octenol, warmth, water vapor, and sound.
In one aspect of the present device, volatile organic compounds are used as olfactory attractants. In one embodiment, synthetic blends of phytochemicals that are strongly attractive to An. gambiae have been created de novo. For example, the blends of olfactory attractants are developed empirically, through behavioral bioassay in outdoor screenhouses, from various plant-based volatile organic compounds. These olfactory attractants are effective in attracting and inducing feeding by An. gambiae in a semi-natural setting in the presence of competing host plants and are useful for both trap and bait station types of devices.
In some embodiments, the present device includes at least one volatile organic compound. The volatile organic compounds include those occurring in the headspace or extracts of flowers known to attract mosquitoes and other insects in the field. Examples include 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, hexanol, linalool, linalool oxide, ethylphenylacetate, methylsalicylate, myrcene, ocimene, phenylacetaldehyde, and pinene. Addition examples of suitable volatile organic compounds can be found in Nyasembe et al. (“Development and Assessment of Plant-Based Synthetic Odor Baits for Surveillance and Control of Malaria Vectors,” PLOS ONE, 2014, vol. 9, issue 2, e89818) and Nyasembe et al. (“Volatile Phytochemicals as Mosquito Semiochemicals,” Phytochemistry Letters, 2014, vol. 8, 196-201). Preferred volatile organic compounds used in the present device include hexanol, linalool, and phenylacetaldehyde.
The volatile organic compounds can be used alone as a single compound or as a blend of multiple compounds. A blend of volatile organic compounds may contain up to 10 individual compounds. For example, the blend of volatile organic compounds can contain at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, at least seven, at least eight, and at least nine individual compounds. The blend of volatile organic compounds can contain less than ten, less than nine, less than eight, less than seven, less than six, less than five, less than four, and less than three individual compounds. In general, a higher dose of volatile organic compounds (used alone or as a blend) provides more effective attraction. In one embodiment, the present device includes a blend of volatile organic compounds as attractant for Anopheles gambiae. Examples of suitable blends of volatile organic compounds include a six-part blend of pinene, linalool, methylsalicylate, myrcene, phenylacetaldehyde, and benzaldehyde, each at a dose of 500 μl; a four-part blend consisting of pinene, linalool, methylsalicylate, and phenylacetaldehyde, each at a dose of 500 μl; a four-part blend consisting of pinene (100 μl), linalool (500 μl), methylsalicylate (10 μl), and phenylacetaldehyde (1000 μl); and a three-part blend of linalool (200 μl), hexanol (300 μl), and phenylacetaldehyde (700 μl). Preferably, the attractant used in the present device comprises a three-part blend of linalool at a concentration of 0.0625%-0.5%, 1-hexanol at a concentration of 0.0938%-0.75%, and phenylacetaldehyde at a concentration of 0.2188%-1.75%. In addition, the ratio of linalool:1-hexanol:phenylacetaldehyde is preferably maintained at approximately 2:3:7.
The volatile organic compounds can be suspended in a liquid carrier and applied to a substrate to control the release rate of such volatile compounds. The liquid carrier can be mineral oil, glycerol, or a solvent selected from water, alcohols, petroleum distillates, acids, and esters, and combinations thereof. The substrate can be an absorptive material that absorbs the volatile organic compound/carrier mixture to provide a reservoir of the compound. Examples of suitable substrates include cotton (e.g., cotton wick), nylon fiber strips, and polymeric gel. In one embodiment, the carrier for the volatile organic compounds is mineral oil, and the substrate is cotton wick. The substrate containing the volatile organic compound can be included in a separate component (e.g. the tube 26) of the present device to provide a reservoir of olfactory attractant.
Typically, the volatile organic compound (or blend of several compounds) is suspended or dissolved in the liquid carrier in an amount of at least about 0.005%, at least about 0.01%, at least about 0.05%, at least about 0.1%, at least about 0.5%, at least about 1%, at least about 2%, or at least about 3%, at least about 4%, at least about 6%, at least about 8%, at least about 10%, at least about 12%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 50% or at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and less than about 95%, less than about 90%, less than about 80%, less than about 75%, less than about 70%, less than about 65%, less than about 60%, less than about 55%, less than about 50%, less than about 45%, less than about 35%, less than about 30%, less than about 25%, less than about 20%, less than about 15%, less than about 10%, less than about 5%, less than about 2.5%, less than about 2%, less than about 1%, less than about 0.5%, or less than about 0.1% by weight of the suspension or solution.
Additional Components
In some embodiments, the sugar/toxin solution is substantially free of, or excludes any amount of, an insecticide synergist such as piperonyl butoxide (PBO), N-octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide (MGK-264), piprotal, propyl isome, sesamex, sesamolin, or sulfoxide. The composition may be substantially free of, or exclude any amount of, one or more of piperonyl butoxide (PBO), N-octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide (MGK-264), piprotal, propyl isome, sesamex, sesamolin, or sulfoxide in any combination.
In some embodiments, the sugar/toxin solution further includes at least one synergist. A synergist refers to an agent that synergizes the activity of an insecticide. Synergists may include, but are not limited to, the synergists identified in the preceding paragraph, perilla oil, one of its components, or a perillaldehyde analog, as detailed and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/149,513, filed Jan. 7, 2014, published as U.S. Patent Publication No. 2014/0121184 A1 on May 1, 2014, which is incorporated into this specification by reference in its entirety.
The sugar/toxin solution or the attractants, or any combination thereof, may comprise additional components including, but not limited to, herbicides, fungicides, nematicides, acaricides, bactericides, rodenticides, miticides, algicides, germicides, repellents, nutrients, other preservatives, and combinations thereof. Specific examples of herbicides include, without limitation, a urea, a sulfonyl urea, a phenylurea, a pyrazole, a dinitroaniline, a benzoic acid, an amide, a diphenylether, an imidazole, an aminotriazole, a pyridazine, an amide, a sulfonamide, a uracil, a benzothiadiazinone, a phenol, and a combination thereof. Specific examples of fungicides include, without limitation, a dithiocarbamate, a phenylamide, a benzimidazole, a substituted benzene, a strobilurin, a carboxamide, a hydroxypyrimidine, a anilopyrimidine, a phenylpyrrole, a sterol demethylation inhibitor, a triazole, and a combination thereof. Specific examples of acaricides or miticides include, without limitation, rosemary oil, thymol, spirodiclogen, cyflumetofen, pyridaben, diafenthiuron, etoxazole, spirodiclofen, acequinocyl, bifenazate, and any combination thereof.
Carriers
In some embodiments, sugar/toxin solution or the attractants, or any combination thereof, may include one or more carriers and/or diluents such as, for example, any solid or liquid or gas carrier or diluent that is commonly used in pesticidal, agricultural, or horticultural compositions. Suitably, any included additional carrier or diluent will not reduce the insecticidal efficacy of the composition, relative to the efficacy of the composition in the absence of the additional component. Carriers and diluents include, for example, solvents (e.g., water, alcohols, petroleum distillates, acids, and esters); mineral oil, glycerol, or a diluent that provides viscosity modifying properties; vegetable (including, but not limited to, methylated vegetable) and/or plant-based oils as well as ester derivatives thereof (e.g., wintergreen oil, cedarwood oil, rosemary oil, peppermint oil, geraniol, rose oil, palmarosa oil, citronella oil, citrus oils (e.g., lemon, lime, and orange), dillweed oil, corn oil, sesame oil, soybean oil, palm oil, vegetable oil, olive oil, peanut oil, and canola oil). The composition can include varying amounts of other components such as, for example, surfactants (e.g., non-ionic, anionic, cationic, and zwitterionic surfactants); fatty acids and fatty acid esters of plant oils (e.g., methyl palmitate/oleate/linoleate); and other auxiliary ingredients such as, for example, emulsifiers, dispersants, stabilizers, suspending agents, penetrants, coloring agents/dyes, UV-absorbing agents, and fragrances, as necessary or desired.
Amounts
The attractant or toxin or sugar can be present in an amount of at least about 0.005%, at least about 0.01%, at least about 0.05%, at least about 0.1%, at least about 0.5%, at least about 1%, at least about 2%, or at least about 3%, at least about 4%, at least about 6%, at least about 8%, at least about 10%, at least about 12%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 50% or at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, and less than about 95%, less than about 90%, less than about 80%, less than about 75%, less than about 70%, less than about 65%, less than about 60%, less than about 55%, less than about 50%, less than about 45%, less than about 35%, less than about 30%, less than about 25%, less than about 20%, less than about 15%, less than about 10%, less than about 5%, less than about 2.5%, less than about 2%, less than about 1%, less than about 0.5%, or less than about 0.1% by weight of the composition.
Insects
As used herein, insects may include any sugar-foraging insect that is a nuisance, carries disease, or attacks mammals, or any combination thereof. Mammals may include, for example, humans, domesticated animals, and pets. In particular, insects may include, but are not limited to, mosquitoes. “Mosquito” is understood to refer to any species of the approximately 3,500 species of the insect that is commonly associated with and given the common name, “mosquito.” Mosquitoes span 41 insect genera, including the non-limiting examples of Aedes, Culex, Anopheles (carrier of malaria), Coquillettidia, and Ochlerotatus. In a preferred embodiment, the target insect is the mosquito species Anopheles gambiae, which is an African malaria vector.
Insects may further include agronomic pests. Agronomic pests include larvae of the order Lepidoptera, such as armyworms, (e.g., beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua)), cutworms, loopers (e.g., cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni)), and heliothines in the family Noctuidae (e.g., fall armyworm (Spodoptera fugiperda J. E. Smith), beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua Hubner), black cutworm (Agrotis ipsilon Huihagel), and tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens Fabricius)); borers, casebearers, webworms, coneworms, cabbageworms and skeletonizers from the family Pyralidae (e.g., European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner), navel orangeworm (Amyelois transitella Walker), corn root webworm (Crambus caliginosellus Clemens), and sod webworms (Pyralidae: Crambinae) such as sod webworm (Herpetogramma licarsisalis Walker)); leafrollers, budworms, seed worms, and fruit worms in the family Tortricidae (e.g., codling moth (Cydia pomonella Linnaeus), grape berry moth (Endopiza viteana Clemens), and oriental fruit moth (Grapholita molesta Busck)); and many other economically important Lepidoptera (e.g., diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella Linnaeus), pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders), silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia argentifolii), and gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar Linnaeus)); foliar feeding larvae and adults of the order Coleoptera including weevils from the families Anthribidae, Bruchidae, and Curculionidae (e.g., boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis Boheman), rice water weevil (Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus Kuschel), granary weevil (Sitophilus granarius Linnaeus), rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae Linnaeus), annual bluegrass weevil (Listronotus maculicollis Dietz), bluegrass billbug (Sphenophorus parvulus Gyllenhal), hunting billbug (Sphenophorus venatus vestitus), and Denver billbug (Sphenophorus cicatristriatus Fahraeus)); flea beetles, cucumber beetles, rootworms, leaf beetles, potato beetles, and leafminers in the family Chrysomelidae (e.g., Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say)); western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte); western flower thrip (Frankliniella occidentalis)); chafers and other beetles from the family Scaribaeidae (e.g., Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica Newman), oriental beetle (Anomala orientalis Waterhouse), northern masked chafer (Cyclocephala borealis Arrow), southern masked chafer (Cyclocephala immaculata Olivier), black turfgrass ataenius (Ataenius spretulus Haldeman), green June beetle (Cotinis nitida Linnaeus), Asiatic garden beetle (Maladera castanea Arrow), May/June beetles (Phyllophaga spp.) and European chafer (Rhizotrogus majalis Razoumowsky)); carpet beetles from the family Dermestidae; wireworms from the family Elateridae; bark beetles from the family Scolytidae; flour beetles from the family Tenebrionidae; leafhoppers (e.g., Empoasca spp.) from the family Cicadellidae; planthoppers from the families Fulgoroidae and Delphacidae (e.g., corn plant hopper (Peregrinus maidis)); treehoppers from the family Membracidae; psyllids from the family Psyllidae; whiteflies from the family Aleyrodidae; aphids from the family Aphididae, such as Aphis gossypii (cotton melon aphid), Acyrthisiphon pisum Harris (pea aphid), Aphis craccivora Koch (cowpea aphid), Aphis fabae Scopoli (black bean aphid), Aphis gossypii Glover (cotton aphid, melon aphid), Aphis pomi De Geer (apple aphid), Aphis spiraecola Patch (spirea aphid), Aulacorthum solani Kaltenbach (foxglove aphid), Chaetosiphon fragaefolii Cockerell (strawberry aphid), Diuraphis noxia Kurdjumov/Mordvilko (Russian wheat aphid), Dysaphis plantaginea Paaserini (rosy apple aphid), Eriosoma lanigerum Hausmann (woolly apple aphid), Hyalopterus pruni Geoffroy (mealy plum aphid), Lipaphis erysimi Kaltenbach (turnip aphid), Metopolophium dirrhodum Walker (cereal aphid), Macrosipum euphorbiae Thomas (potato aphid), Myzus persicae Sulzer (peach-potato aphid, green peach aphid), Nasonovia ribisnigri Mosley (lettuce aphid), Pemphigus spp. (root aphids and gall aphids), Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch (corn leaf aphid), Rhopalosiphum padi Linnaeus (bird cherry-oat aphid), Schizaphis graminum Rondani (greenbug), Sitobion avenae Fabricius (English grain aphid), Therioaphis maculata Buckton (spotted alfalfa aphid), Toxoptera aurantii Boyer de Fonscolombe (black citrus aphid), Toxoptera citricida Kirkaldy (brown citrus aphid) and green peach aphid (Myzus persicae); phylloxera from the family Phylloxeridae; mealybugs from the family Pseudococcidae; scales from the families Coccidae, Diaspididae, and Margarodidae; lace bugs from the family Tingidae; stink bugs from the family Pentatomidae; flat mites in the family Tenuipalpidae (e.g., citrus flat mite (Brevipalpus lewisi McGregor)); rust and bud mites in the family Eriophyidae and other foliar feeding mites; chinch bugs (e.g., hairy chinch bug (Blissus leucopterus hirtus Montandon) and southern chinch bug (Blissus insularis Barber) and other seed bugs from the family Lygaeidae); spittlebugs from the family Cercopidae; squash bugs from the family Coreidae; red bugs and cotton stainers from the family Pyrrhocoridae; and adults and immatures of the order Orthoptera including grasshoppers, locusts, and crickets (e.g., migratory grasshoppers (e.g., Melanoplus sanguinipes Fabricius, M. differentialis Thomas)), American grasshoppers (e.g., Schistocerca americana Drury), desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskal), migratory locust (Locusta migratoria Linnaeus), bush locust (Zonocerus spp.); adults and immatures of the order Diptera including insects from the genus Culicoides, leafminers, midges, fruit flies (Tephritidae), frit flies (e.g., Oscinella frit Linnaeus)), soil maggots; adults and nymphs of the orders Hemiptera and Homoptera such as plant bugs from the family Miridae; adults and immatures of the order Thysanoptera including onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman), flower thrips (Frankliniella spp.), and other foliar feeding thrips; and cicadas from the family Cicadidae. Agronomic pests also include Classes Nematoda, Cestoda, Trematoda, and Acanthocephala including economically important members of the orders Strongylida, Ascaridida, Oxyurida, Rhabditida, Spirurida, and Enoplida such as economically important agricultural pests (e.g., root knot nematodes in the genus Meloidogyne, lesion nematodes in the genus Pratylenchus, and stubby root nematodes in the genus Trichodorus). Agronomic and non-agronomic pests include nymphs and adults of the order Blattodea including cockroaches from the families Blattellidae and Blattidae (e.g., oriental cockroach (Blatta orientalis Linnaeus), Asian cockroach (Blatella asahinai Mizukubo), German cockroach (Blattella germanica Linnaeus), brownbanded cockroach (Supella longipalpa Fabricius), American cockroach (Periplaneta americana Linnaeus), brown cockroach (Periplaneta brunnea Burmeister), Madeira cockroach (Leucophaea maderae Fiabricius), smoky brown cockroach (Periplaneta fuliginosa Service), Australian Cockroach (Periplaneta australasiae Fabr.), lobster cockroach (Nauphoeta cinerea Olivier) and smooth cockroach (Symploce pallens Stephens)); adults and larvae of the order Dermaptera including earwigs from the family Forficulidae (e.g., European earwig (Forficula auricularia Linnaeus), and black earwig (Chelisoches morio Fabricius)). Also included are adults and larvae of the order Acari (mites) such as spider mites and red mites in the family Tetranychidae (e.g., European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch), two spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch), and McDaniel mite (Tetranychus mcdanieli McGregor)); mites important in human and animal health (e.g., dust mites in the family Epidermoptidae, follicle mites in the family Demodicidae, and grain mites in the family Glycyphagidae); ticks in the order Ixodidae (e.g., deer tick (Ixodes scapularis Say), Australian paralysis tick (Ixodes holocyclus Neumann), American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis Say), and lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum Linnaeus)); scab and itch mites in the families Psoroptidae, Pyemotidae, and Sarcoptidae); crickets such as house cricket (Acheta domesticus Linnaeus), mole crickets (e.g., tawny mole cricket (Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder), and southern mole cricket (Scapteriscus borellii Giglio-Tos)); flies including house flies (e.g., Musca domestica Linnaeus), lesser house flies (e.g., Fannia canicularis Linnaeus, F. femoralis Stein), stable flies (e.g., Stomoxys calcitrans Linnaeus), face flies, horn flies, blow flies (e.g., Chrysomya spp., Phormia spp.), and other muscoid fly pests, horse flies (e.g., Tabanus spp.), bot flies (e.g., Gastrophilus spp., Oestrus spp.), cattle grubs (e.g., Hypoderma spp.), deer flies (e.g., Chrysops spp.), keds (e.g., Melophagus ovinus Linnaeus) and other Brachycera; mosquitoes (e.g., Aedes spp., Anopheles spp., Culex spp.), black flies (e.g., Prosimulium spp., Simulium spp.), biting midges, sand flies, biting sand flies, sciarids, and other Nematocera; insect pests of the order Hymenoptera including ants (e.g., red carpenter ant (Camponotus ferrugineus Fabricius), black carpenter ant (Camponotus pennsylvanicus De Geer), Pharaoh ant (Monomorium pharaonis Linnaeus), little fire ant (Wasmannia auropunctata Roger), fire ant (Solenopsis geminata Fabricius), red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren), Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr), crazy ant (Paratrechina longicornis Latreille), pavement ant (Tetramorium caespitum Linnaeus), cornfield ant (Lasius alienus Forster), odorous house ant (Tapinoma sessile Say)); insect pests of the Family Formicidae including the Florida carpenter ant (Camponotus floridanus Buckley), white-footed ant (Technomyrmex albipes fr. Smith), big headed ants (Pheidole spp.), and ghost ant (Tapinoma melanocephalum Fabricius); bees (including carpenter bees), hornets, yellow jackets, wasps, and sawflies (Neodiprion spp.; Cephus spp.); insect pests of the order Isoptera including termites in the Termitidae (ex. Macrotermes sp.), Kalotermitidae (ex. Cryptotermes sp.), and Rhinotermitidae (ex. Reticulitermes spp., Coptotermes spp.), families the eastern subterranean termite (Reticulitermes flavipes Kollar), western subterranean termite (Reticulitermes hesperus Banks), Formosan subterranean termite (Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki), West Indian drywood termite (Incisitermes immigrans Snyder), powder post termite (Cryptotermes brevis Walker), drywood termite (Incisitermes snyderi Light), southeastern subterranean termite (Reticulitermes virginicus Banks), western drywood termite (Incisitermes minor Hagen), arboreal termites such as Nasutitermes sp. and other termites of economic importance; insect pests of the order Thysanura such as silverfish (Lepisma saccharina Linnaeus) and firebrat (Thermobia domestica Packard); insect pests of the order Mallophaga and including the head louse (Pediculus humanus capitis De Geer), body louse (Pediculus humanus humanus Linnaeus), chicken body louse (Menacanthus stramineus Nitszch), dog biting louse (Trichodectes canis De Geer), fluff louse (Goniocotes gallinae De Geer), sheep body louse (Bovicola ovis Schrank), short-nosed cattle louse (Haematopinus eurysternus Nitzsch); long-nosed cattle louse (Linognathus vituli Linnaeus) and other sucking and chewing parasitic lice that attack man and animals; insect pests of the order Siphonoptera including the oriental rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis Rothschild), cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis Bouche), dog flea (Ctenocephalides canis Curtis), hen flea (Ceratophyllus gallinae Schrank), sticktight flea (Echidnophaga gallinacea Westwood), human flea (Pulex irritans Linnaeus) and other fleas afflicting mammals and birds. Arthropod pests also include spiders in the order Araneae such as the brown recluse spider (Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch & Mulaik) and the black widow spider (Latrodectus mactans Fabricius), and centipedes in the order Scutigeromorpha such as the house centipede (Scutigera coleoptrata Linnaeus). In some embodiments, the composition comprising attractant and/or toxin does not attract or kill bees.
Embodiments described in this specification are generally designed to kill insects in the adult stage, but can be configured and used to kill insects in other life stages.
One advantage of the invention is that particular orders or species can be targeted by varying the attractants, including but not limited to the visual attractant, used in the bait station. In that regard, embodiments can be tailored to the region where they will be used to avoid killing non-target species. Preferable embodiments of the invention target flying insects where the bait station can be hung or otherwise located such that ground-dwelling insects like ants cannot reach the bait station to consume the sugar/toxin solution.
It is observed in field trials that the present insect control device effectively reduces the parity rate of mosquitoes. The terms “parous” and “parity” refer to female mosquitoes that have laid eggs. The term “nulliparous” refers to female mosquitoes that have not laid eggs. The parity of the mosquitoes can be determined by known techniques, such as ovarian dissection of captured female mosquitoes. The term “parity rate” means the proportion or percentage of parous mosquitoes among the total number of female mosquitoes analyzed. Parity rate reflects the age structure of the mosquito population, which in turn affects the survivorship, longevity, and infection capacity of the mosquitoes.
The reduction in parity rate demonstrates that the instant device reduces the longevity of the mosquitoes in the treated environment. Significantly, the vectorial capacity of mosquitoes (such as Anopheles) for spreading diseases strongly depends on survivorship. Longer-lived mosquitoes are the epidemiologically dangerous ones, as only the oldest females live long enough to become infective by bite. Compared to the mosquito population in the untreated environment, the age structure of the mosquitoes in the treated environment is changed toward young female mosquitoes that have not taken a blood meal and have not yet laid eggs. Thus, the instant device substantially reduces the vectorial capacity of the mosquitoes by reducing their longevity and changing their age structure.
Prototypes of first and second polygonal bait stations 110a, 110b were made by wrapping different colors of fabric (e.g., a jute sheet) around a delta-shape metal frame 150. Each side was 7 inches, and its length was 10 inches. To make the first feeding station (e.g., the light colored feeding station 110a,
The light-colored feeding stations 110a were impregnated with a mixture of 100 ml sucrose solution (50%) and 100 mg Fluorescent Brightener 28 (Tinopal), whereas 100 mg rhodamine B was added to the sucrose solution impregnating the fabric of the black stations 110b. Before starting the tests in a mesocosm, two groups of mosquitoes were allowed to feed on the dyed solutions overnight to ensure that the mixtures were palatable to the mosquitoes, and that the dyes in the mosquitoes' bodies could be observed under UV light. Tinopal looks clear in normal lightning, but turns blue under UV light. Rhodamine B appears red in both normal lighting and UV lights.
All tests were conducted in two mesocosms 174 (only one is shown in
Five replicates were run in three nights. Each evening, between 220 and 320 1-day old mosquitoes (Anopheles gambiae) that had been kept on water since emergence were released in each mesocosm. The mosquitoes were collected by power aspirator the next morning (˜15 hr after release), frozen, and inspected for presence of the dyes. Male and female mosquitoes were categorized in one of the five groups: rhodamine B (black station), tinopal (light colored station), trace of rhodamine B (black station), both dyes (both stations), and no dye (unfed, which means that the mosquitoes did not visit a station).
Before aspirating mosquitoes from the mesocosms, the stations were checked to approximate the number of resting mosquitoes. Whereas light-colored stations 110a had very few mosquitoes (<5%) within them, many were observed resting inside the black stations 110b (
When the data from the two rhodamine B groups (=Black) are combined, the results were as follows: 82.3% females and 79.2% males (average 80.6% combined sexes, SE=1.9%) had fed from the sugar on the black stations (SE: 2.2 and 2.1%, respectively). Details for each replicate are shown in Table 3.
Without being bound by any particular theory, the following hypothesis can be made. The proportion among recaptured mosquitoes in each dye category indicates that the black feeding station was fed upon far more than the light-colored one, and therefore black was a preferred color. The high proportion of mosquitoes with a strong rhodamine B marker may be an indication of sugar feeding in the black stations later at night, whereas those with a trace of rhodamine B may have ingested a low amount of sugar from the black stations or had fed earlier at night, allowing a longer period of sugar digestion. It should be noted that the proportion of the mosquitoes that remained unfed (13.2% combined sexes) was higher than the proportion of mosquitoes that took sugar from the light-colored delta stations only (4.3%). Very few mosquitoes (1.9%) fed on both colors of the stations, probably because majority of mosquitoes were satiated during the first encounter with the sugar solution.
The high feeding rates on the black delta stations in this experiment do not necessarily mean that black is the most attractive color for Anopheles gambiae, but are evidence that this species can distinguish contrasts, which therefore act as a visual attractant.
Attraction tests were conducted in two sizes of outdoor screenhouses (˜5.5×7 m and 11×7 m, each >3 m high) at the Mbita research station (Odhiambo Campus, Kenya) of the International Centre of Insect Physiology & Ecology (ICIPE). The screenhouses provided a semi-natural physical environment that allowed experimental control over mosquito sample size and recovery of marked and/or released mosquitoes. It was noted that fluctuations of weather conditions would cause variations in flight behavior from night to night, affecting attraction to volatile organic compounds. The walls and ceiling were lined with netting to reduce interference from ants and spiders and to prevent mosquitoes from aggregating in the vaulted ceiling. The floor was a bed of sand, dampened daily. On the floor at each corner of the screenhouse, dampened pots served as resting harborages, which the mosquitoes typically entered at dawn. When local potted plants were included in the environment, they were spaced throughout the floor.
Additional attraction tests were conducted in two greenhouse-enclosed mesocosms (˜4.9×5.7 m, each 3 m high) at The Ohio State University. These tests served as follow-ups to the outdoor study, using volatile organic compound blends already identified as being attractive. The mesocosms minimized weather's effect on mosquito behavior and allowed for very high rate of recapture (by trap+aspirator) at the end of the test, allowing accurate attraction rates to be calculated. The results confirmed the blends' performance, but gave higher scores.
Tested mosquitoes were the Mbita strain of Anopheles gambiae, colonized locally about 14 years ago, but with infusions of field material in some subsequent years, to maintain genetic diversity. Adults emerging each night from daily collections of pupae were fed water only and were tested in the screenhouses the following night. At this age, both sexes still have adequate deposits of somatic energy from larval feeding but will die during the following 1.5 days without nutrients. Before sunset, the volatile organic compounds baits were installed in mosquito traps, their fans were turned on, and the mosquitoes were released from a small cage prepared for that purpose.
Attraction was measured as the number of mosquitoes caught in MM-X or BG Sentinel traps baited with plant-based volatile organic compounds. The volatile organic compounds were prepared as individual compounds suspended in mineral oil, which controlled release rate according to dosage (concentration) while also retarding release rate of all compounds. Each compound was released separately from other compounds when more than one was released simultaneously. The oil-volatile organic compound suspensions were applied to two different types of release substrates: long nylon fabric strips in the exhaust tube of the trap, and short cotton wicks suspended in a wire basket beneath the exhaust tube. Measures of weight loss of compounds from these substrates indicated that the wicks gave a smoother and more gradual release rate during the trapping period. As an example of the tested volatile organic compounds, the release profiles of hexanol and phenylacetaldehyde (suspended in hexane or mineral oil, applied to nylon sock or cotton wick) as measured in a MM-X trap is shown in
The layout of traps was designed to maximize discrimination among traps releasing different plant-based volatile organic compounds or releasing none (the blank control). The small screenhouses contained 2 traps, positioned diagonally. The large screenhouses contained 4 traps. In both sizes, the traps were near the corners, but not so close to the netting walls as to interfere with mosquito flight around the traps or the free flow of the odor plume from the traps. For replicates of each test, the positions of the traps were rotated, to minimize positional bias for one of these variables: a particular compound, particular dose of a compound, or particular combination of several compounds or their proportions. In early tests, a blank trap was always included. But after establishing that a blank trap never caught more than 10 mosquitoes, out of 300-400 released, blank traps were usually replaced by one with a bait using volatile organic compounds. The number trapped out of the total number released, expressed as a percentage, was seldom calculated, because of the large and variable numbers of mosquitoes unaccounted for by trap and aspirator recapture. Instead, the effectiveness of the volatile organic compounds or blends of compounds in attracting mosquitoes was evaluated based on the actual number of mosquitoes caught by the trap.
a) Single Compounds. About 20 volatile organic compounds of interest were selected for potential testing. The list was a composite subset of a) those previously demonstrated to attract mosquitoes, b) those found in the headspace or extracts of plants that we have found to be particularly attractive to Anopheles gambiae in the lab or field, and c) those frequently occurring in the headspace of flowers known to attract mosquitoes and other insects in the field. From that long list, a shorter list of 3-5 volatile organic compounds were identified as particularly likely to produce attraction.
b) Blends of Compounds. Two or more compounds were tested together, released simultaneously but separately within a single trap. These started with combinations of single compounds that showed indications of attractiveness by themselves, according to a minimum of 20-mosquitoes-trapped criterion. These were designated as blends, though they were not mixed prior to release. On the nylon strips they were separated by applying each suspension in a long line, sometimes by using 2-3 strips, each with 2-3 suspensions of volatile organic compounds. When cotton wicks were deployed, one suspension was applied to each end of a wick, and 3-4 wicks were sometimes used. The most promising blends were investigated further, by modifying the proportions of their components and by subtracting components to determine the essential parts contributing to their attractiveness. Typically, blends containing three to ten components were investigated in this manner.
To assess attraction of volatile organic compounds in marked-bait station, a piece of fabric was impregnated with concentrated sugar containing a dye and a volatile compound or blend of compounds. Among all mosquitoes recovered the next morning, the proportion containing the dye gave an accurate indication of the number attracted to the fabric, landing on it, and consequently feeding.
Results. In all cases, the numbers of mosquitoes caught in plant-based volatile organic compound-baited MM-X traps were represented by similar proportions of both sexes, in accordance with nectar-feeding studies in the field. In general, single compounds in higher dosages (and therefore higher release rates) gave higher attraction scores. This was particularly obvious for caryophyllene, linalool, linalool oxide, ethylphenylacetate, and ocimene. Hexanol was notable for giving good scores even at low dosages, with little or no improvement at higher doses. Linalool oxide was expected to provide strong attraction, and phenylacetaldehyde moderately strong attraction, in view of published results. They proved to be weak or mediocre in these screenhouse tests. The great majority of single compounds gave poor to weak attraction scores (<20) at all doses tested, including those volatile organic compounds that proved to be important components of attractive blends (see below). No screenhouse-position effects were noted, but rain and wind appeared to diminish attraction scores.
Blends consisting of up to 10 ingredients were investigated. Most blends initially tested contained 5 or 6 compounds, many of them already having scored moderately well in single-compound tests. The highest attraction scores were achieved, however, with blends not performing particularly well as singles. But similar to single compounds, higher doses of blends generally gave higher attraction scores. The highest score reported (139) came from a six-part blend of pinene, linalool, methylsalicylate, myrcene, phenylacetaldehyde, and benzaldehyde, each at a dose of 500 μl. Blends of four compounds also gave relatively good attraction, and varied according to the proportions of its constituents. For example a four-part blend consisting of pinene, linalool, methylsalicylate, and phenylacetaldehyde, each at 500 μl, gave a score of 49. The same four-part blend, but at doses of 100, 500, 10, and 1000 μl, respectively, gave a capture score of 80 mosquitoes. Several 3-part blends also gave capture scores in the 30-50 range. For example, a blend of linalool (200 μl), hexanol (300 μl), and phenylacetaldehyde (700 μl) gave a score of 79, and was used routinely in further studies.
For bait stations, a preliminary experiment was carried out with 10 small square pieces of cloth (˜10 cm) soaked in a mixture of a multi-part volatile organic compounds blend, sugar, and dye. The cloths were hung on potted local plants, distributed throughout the screenhouse and including many known to provide nectar to An. gambiae. The results demonstrated that about 49% of the mosquitoes visited these stations overnight. When it was repeated with only one station in the same screenhouse, nevertheless 21% fed on the station in a single night, despite the fact that many of the unmarked mosquitoes had fed on natural nectar from the available plants. Similar experiments with a 3-part blend (linalool:hexanol:phenylacetaldehyde=2:3:7) showed that on successive nights 59% visited 8 bait stations overnight, 68% and 64% visited 6 stations, 28% visited 2 stations, and 23% and 8% visited 1 station, which was in competition with abundant natural sources of sugar.
Materials. Female mosquitoes of Anopheles gambiae Mbita strain were studied for their feeding behavior on fabric impregnated with sucrose solution.
Method. Dyed sucrose solutions were prepared and stored in the 4° C. refrigerator. Red was assigned to the dry treatments and blue/green to the moist treatments. Ten fabric sleeves were soaked in dyed sucrose solution, five in each color, hung in the fume hood in the lab on string with paper clips, and allowed to dry in the fume hood until dry to the touch. After they were dried, the blue/green sleeves received moistened, gel packet inserts. Moistening was done by presenting the packets to steam generated over boiling water. The other five fabric envelopes were left without inserts and were dry. One envelope was placed into a ca. ½ L volume cup and held in place with a paper clip. Into each cup were transferred 15 female mosquitoes by use of a mouth pipette. Cups were transferred to an incubator kept at 27° C. and 85% RH. The number of dead mosquitoes in the cups was counted daily.
Results. In one experiment, a similar mosquito survival rate was observed in the dry surface and moist surface treatments during the first eight days of the experiment (resulting in about 70% survival at day 8, as shown in
Conclusion. Anopheles gambiae females fed readily on sugar presented in a dry surface or as a moistened surface from fabric material. Without sugar or any other source of energy, mosquitoes will rapidly die in cages. Nevertheless, mortality was low and conversely survival very high for one week and was comparable in cages with dry surface and moist surface sugar sources. These findings support the conclusion that Anopheles gambiae can obtain sugar from a dry surface, albeit in a humid environment, and without any water source.
The feeding of An. albimanus from a sugar was studied using several delivery systems. Sugar was dissolved in water to form a solution to which a dye substrate was added. Upon feeding on the delivery systems, the mosquitoes absorbed the dye substrate into their bodies, which showed the corresponding color of the substrate to facilitate evaluation of results (such as the number of live vs. dead mosquitoes). Typically, female An. albimanus were tested in cages at a 30 mosquitoes per case population. An. albimanus feeding on fabric was tested by treating the fabric with 10% sugar solution. The fabric was dried and was re-hydrated with water during testing. The results from the fabric tests were compared to those experiments using 10% sugar solution, cotton ball soaked with 10% sugar solution, water only, and no water (
In this example, a superabsorbent toxic gel was prepared, which included a gel formed by a superabsorbent polymer, a sugar, and a toxin. The gel was packed into a package (hereinafter a “gel pack”), and was placed in a container. The container was then placed on the base of a bait station as shown in
Materials. Seven free hanging ATSB stations with gel packs and seven drums with ATSB stations (with gel pack) inside were prepared. The gel pack was made by mixing a superabsorbent polymer with a liquid mixture of a toxin, a sugar, and water. For example, 100 grams of a crosslinked sodium polyacrylate polymer (Waste Lock® 770, CAS Number: 09003-04-7, M2 Polymer Technologies, Inc., West Dundee, Ill.) was mixed with 20 kg of a liquid containing 20% by weight unrefined sugar, 0.2% by weight spinosad, 0.2% by weight MBS 2550 (a preservative to control bacteria and fungi), and 79.6% by weight water. The mixture was stirred and mixed thoroughly every 10-15 minutes to allow gel formation and typically reached desired thickness within approximately 2 hours. Additional polymer was added in some preparations and thoroughly mixed with the liquid. The gel was then allowed to thicken over an additional 2-hour period until the desired consistency was achieved. The total amount of the polymer was recorded. After formation, the gel was placed in a container (PET or similar plastic material) ranging from 4 inches to 8 inches wide and 4 inches to 8 inches long. In some preparations, the gel was covered with a lid containing holes or parafilm. In other preparations, the gel was not covered. The container was then placed on the base of the bait station.
Setting. The experiment was conducted in a non-sleeping sentinel house in KEMRI, Kenya. All seven free hanging ATSB stations were hung from the eaves of the sentinel house at same lengths from the eaves. All seven drums with ATSB stations were placed on the floor of the sentinel house. The free hanging ATSB stations and the ATSB stations in the drums were spritzed, i.e., lightly sprayed, with a mixture of spinosad (ranging from 0.05% by weight to about 1.0% by weight) and sugar (such as unrefined sugar, about 20% by weight) in water, or spinosad only in water (ranging from 0.05% by weight to about 1.0% by weight). Typically, a spritzing program was set up primarily to keep the stations wet for both the sentinel house and the field trial. In a representative spritzing program, the stations were loaded up at the beginning by spritzing with 20% sugar and 0.2% spinosad (Day 0), and were then spritzed every other week with only 0.1% spinosad and no additional sugar (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10). The stations were kept moisturized by spritzing water before the next scheduled spritzing of spinosad (Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11).
To collect samples at a given time point, one ATSB hanging station was selected at random. One drum was also selected at random, and the station inside the drum was removed. The station number for the station (hanging or inside the drum) was recorded. The gel packs from the two ATSB stations were removed and labeled as to whether the gel packs were from a hanging station or from a drum. The two removed stations and the two removed gel packs were then transported immediately to a laboratory at KEMRI for analysis. The remaining stations were spritzed for further experiments.
Bioassay. Three to five-day old Anopheles gambiae Kisumu strain adult female mosquitoes were tested in this study. The mosquitoes were supplied in 30 cm×30 cm cages, and were removed from sugar one day before the bioassay. For treatment cages, each ATSB station was hung inside a dome tent cage, and each gel pack was placed inside a dome tent cage. For control cages, a piece of cotton fabric was soaked in 15% sugar solution in water (prepared by dissolving 15 grams of table sugar in 100 ml of water), allowed to dry, and the dried cotton fabric was hung in the cage. In each cage, water was provided as follows: a small dish containing fresh, unsweetened water and a piece of cotton in it were placed in the cage so that the cotton soaked up the water and presented the moisture in a wet cotton ball to the mosquitoes. No other sugar source was placed in the cage. The mortality rate was measured by the number of dead mosquitoes 24 hours after the experiment was set up. Data were recorded as the numbers of the dead mosquitoes and the number the alive mosquitoes in the cage. The surviving mosquitoes were held for an additional 24 hours with water only to assess mortality. The assay was repeated 3 times. The results are shown in Tables 4-6 below.
Sugar Analysis. Sugar content was analyzed after the bioassay analysis. The sugar contents on the bait station and in the gel pack were measured using a refractometer.
Results. Table 4 shows the mortality data for mosquitoes feeding on dry stations (“Dry”) versus on stations with gels spritzed with water prior to bioassays (“Wet”), in which the stations were placed inside drums. The results and 24- and 48-hour time points are shown.
Table 5 shows the mortality data for mosquitoes feeding on dry stations (“Dry”) versus on stations with gels spritzed with water prior to bioassays (“Wet”), in which the stations were free hanging stations. The results and 24- and 48-hour time points are shown.
Table 6 summarizes the average results under dry and wet conditions for control, station placed in drum (“Station Drum”), gel pack placed in drum (“Gel Drum”), free hanging gel pack (“Gel Hanging”), and free hanging station (“Station Hanging”) at 24- and 48-hour time points.
Conclusion. Tables 4-6 shows that, in general, the mortality rate under wet condition is higher than that under the dry condition in both the free hanging stations and the stations placed in drums. This means that presence of moisture improves the effectiveness of the bait stations. Further, Table 6 shows that, under dry conditions, the presence of a gel pack clearly increases the mortality rate, as compared to the free hanging stations and the stations placed in drum (i.e., about 4-fold increase at 24-hour, and about 2-fold increase at 48-hour). This may be attributed to the ability of the gel pack to capture and retain moisture from the environment, which in turn improves the effectiveness of the gel pack to attract and kill the mosquitoes. Consistent with this explanation, Table 6 shows that the benefit of the gel pack (i.e., the increase of mortality rate) was diminished when the testing was conducted under wet conditions. Specifically, compared to the stations placed in drums, the gel pack showed no increase of mortality rate at 24- and 48-hour. Compared to free hanging stations, the gel pack showed about 10-15% increase in mortality rate at 24- and 48-hour.
Semi-field conditions in the form of large greenhouses at Mbita Point, Kenya, were used to test the effectiveness of the present device with respect to the attractants, visual cues, and formulation herein disclosed. After these semi-field studies, larger field trials were conducted in western Kenya for further evaluation. These trials took place in the Asembo Bay area of western Kenya in collaboration with the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI). Prototype stations as disclosed herein were shipped to Kenya and used in these trials.
Screenhouse and Experimental Hut Studies
Screenhouse studies under realistic conditions with flowering plants, harborage, and a but designed to resemble a typical house in western Kenya revealed high toxic bait station-induced mortality of released male and female Anopheles gambiae, during even one night, under several different permutations of experimental conditions. In particular, results showed high feeding rates on fluorescent dye-marked stations placed indoors, revealing indoor sugar feeding even when plants producing nectar were available outside. These studies demonstrated attraction of released mosquitoes to the prototype ATSB stations. Additional screenhouse tests were done to optimize odor blends and release rates, sugar concentrations, toxin dosages, colors and shapes, and station placement.
Field Trial Design and Settings
The field trial protocol was developed, reviewed and approved by the Kenya ERC committee. Community leader meetings were held to introduce the study to the residents of Asembo Bay. As part of the field trial process, sample prototype stations as described herein were tested in the laboratory facility at KEMRI.
The field trial consisted of 480 houses organized into 24 clusters of 20 houses each. Houses in 12 clusters received no bait stations (control clusters) whereas each house in the 12 treatment clusters received four bait stations as described herein: two set in humidified 20-liter black drums and two hung from interior corners of the house. All stations had on the base a small container with a gel composed of water, sugar, and Spinosad. Sampling commenced in April and continued to August, using light traps, indoor resting collections, and outdoor resting collections in clay pots set along the walls of houses. Mosquitoes that were neither blood-fed nor gravid were retained for parity determination using ovarian dissection. Laboratory works included PCR to separate Anopheles gambiae s.s. from Anopheles arabiensis and sporozoite ELISA to detect malaria positive mosquitoes.
Field Trial Results
Results showed a mix of species, but Anopheles funestus became dominant through the course of the sampling period. Because sugar feeding by this species is poorly studied, it offered the opportunity to examine the effect of instant bait stations on Anopheles funestus. In particular, the results of the study demonstrated that the overall parity rate for all species combined was 82% in mosquitoes sampled in the control houses, but 64% in mosquitoes sampled in treatment houses. Thus, the results showed an 18% reduction in parity rate between treatment and control clusters (
These results demonstrate that the instant bait stations had the effect of reducing the longevity of the mosquitoes entering treatment houses, because parity rate is a strong proxy for longevity and the Davidson formula provides estimates of probability of daily survival, which are measures of longevity. In addition, it was observed that, compared to the mosquito population in the untreated houses, the age structure of the mosquitoes in the treated houses was changed toward young female mosquitoes that have not taken a blood meal.
The recruitment of new Anopheles females in the population was obviously constant and increasing during most of the study. Without being bound to any particular theory, it is hypothesized that the instant bait stations' primary effect in their prototype configuration was on longevity and not on vector density. The parity rate results were considered similar to parity results expected from a typical Indoor Residual Spray application (IRS).
Mosquito populations were very high in the houses involved in the field evaluation, which took place in a semi-lush environment. It was hypothesized that a 12-15% mortality observed in similar trials previously conducted in Mali and Israel may be offset by the sheer numbers of mosquitoes emerging from larval habitats. Population profiles varied by sampling method, with light traps yielding the most Anopheles, followed by indoor densities by aspiration sampling, then outdoor densities by aspiration sampling.
It was observed that Anopheles population densities trended higher in treatment than in control houses, indicating that the attractants established in the instant bait stations had the effect of drawing mosquitoes to the stations. In addition, there was a general trend for a reduction in indoor densities of Anopheles females from treatment compared to control houses.
Thus, the file trial results showed that the instant bait stations effectively reduced the longevity of the mosquitoes, while reduction of vector density might not be the primary effect. These results are important since the longevity of the mosquitoes has a direct bearing on malaria transmission. It is also contemplated that, based on the instant bait stations, greater reduction of the mosquitoes' longevity as well as population density can be achieved by using components disclosed herein, such as various combinations of sugar, toxin, olfactory attractant, visual cue, and wetting agent or mechanism to capture and/or retain moisture.
For reasons of completeness, various aspects of the invention are set out in the following numbered clauses:
Clause 1. A bait station comprising: a housing that comprises a flexible portion; a composition contained on or in the housing, the composition comprising at least one sugar and at least one toxin; a container positioned on or in the housing; at least one olfactory attractant in the container or otherwise on or in the housing; and a substance positioned in the container, the substance comprising at least one of a liquid and a gel.
Clause 2. The bait station of clause 1, wherein the gel comprises silica beads, a superabsorbent material, or a combination thereof.
Clause 3. The bait station of clause 1, wherein the substance further comprises at least one sugar and at least one toxin.
Clause 4. The bait station of clause 1, wherein the housing comprises at least three panels, the panels coupled to one another and defining an opening, wherein the container is positioned at least partially within the opening.
Clause 5. The bait station according to clause 4, wherein at least one of the three panels includes a cut-out and wherein the container is positioned within the cut-out such that a first portion of the container is positioned within the opening and a second portion of the container is positioned outside the opening.
Clause 6. The bait station according to clause 4, further comprising a wicking mechanism, wherein the wicking mechanism includes a cover of the container and a wick, wherein the cover includes a slot, and wherein the wick is positioned in the slot so that a first end of the wick is positioned in a compartment of the container and a second end of the wick is positioned outside the compartment of the container.
Clause 7. The bait station according to clause 6, wherein the substance comprises water.
Clause 8. The bait station according to clause 7, wherein the sugar is 8%-90% sucrose, the toxin is 0.003%-1.0% spinosad, and the olfactory attractant comprises 0.01%-2.0% linalool, 0.01%-3.0% 1-hexanol, and 0.005%-7.0% phenylacetaldehyde.
Clause 9. A bait station comprising: a housing that comprises a flexible portion; an attachment coupled to the housing; a composition contained on or in at least one of the housing or the attachment, the composition comprising at least one sugar and at least one toxin; and at least one olfactory attractant on or in at least one of the housing or the attachment.
Clause 10. The bait station of clause 9, wherein the attachment includes a visual attractant on an exterior surface.
Clause 11. The bait station of clause 10, wherein the visual attractant is black color.
Clause 12. The bait station of clause 9, wherein the housing comprises at least three panels, the panels coupled to one another and defining an opening, wherein the attachment is coupled to one of the three panels.
Clause 13. The bait station of clause 12, wherein the attachment is a first attachment; wherein the bait station further comprises a second attachment coupled to one of the panels that is different than the panel to which the first attachment is coupled; and wherein the composition is contained on at least one of the first attachment and the second attachment.
Clause 14. The bait station of clause 9, wherein the attachment is a sleeve.
Clause 15. The bait station of clause 14, wherein the sleeve has a first portion and a second portion of substantially the same size.
Clause 16. The bait station of clause 9, wherein the olfactory attractant is on or in the attachment and the housing.
Clause 17. The bait station of clause 13, further comprising a container positioned on or in the housing and a substance positioned in the container, the substance comprising at least one of a liquid and a gel.
Clause 18. The bait station of clause 17, further comprising a wicking mechanism, wherein the wicking mechanism includes a cover of the container and a wick, wherein the cover includes a slot, and wherein the wick is positioned in the slot so that a first end of the wick is positioned in a compartment of the container and a second end of the wick is positioned outside the compartment of the container; wherein the substance comprises water; wherein the sugar is 8%-90% sucrose and the toxin is 0.003%-1.0% spinosad; and wherein the olfactory attractant comprises 0.01%-2.0% linalool, 0.01%-3.0% 1-hexanol, and 0.005%-7.0% phenylacetaldehyde.
Clause 19. A method for controlling insects, the method comprising exposing a population to the bait station of clause 1.
Clause 20. The method of clause 19, wherein the insect is a mosquito.
Clause 21. A method for controlling insects, the method comprising exposing a population to the bait station of clause 9.
Clause 22. The method of clause 21, wherein the insect is a mosquito.
Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims priority to and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/793,700, filed Jul. 7, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application therefore also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/022,180, filed Jul. 8, 2014, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/083,294, filed on Nov. 23, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/137,534, filed on Mar. 24, 2015, the entire contents of each of foregoing patent applications being incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62022180 | Jul 2014 | US | |
| 62083294 | Nov 2014 | US | |
| 62137534 | Mar 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14793700 | Jul 2015 | US |
| Child | 14948202 | US |
