Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
The present invention relates in general to automotive air bag systems, and, more specifically, to a hidden air bag deployment door formed by an instrument panel substrate and a molded air bag chute.
Air bag deployment chute assemblies have been put into commercial use for the passenger side of an instrument panel of automotive vehicles. The chute assembly couples an air bag module (typically containing a folded canvas bag and chemical propellants for inflating the bag on command) to a door support panel or substrate of the instrument panel. A typical structure for a chute assembly includes a tubular outer wall, one or more door flaps, a flange surrounding the door area, and one or more hinge members or areas connecting the door flaps to the outer wall and flange.
For styling purposes, it is desirable for the air bag deployment door in the instrument panel to be invisible when viewed from the passenger compartment. In other words, the visible or “Class A” surface of the instrument panel is preferably seamless. Therefore, a pre-weakened seam is required in the substrate (on the “Class B” side) to facilitate tearing open of the door during air bag deployment.
A common material for an instrument panel substrate is injection molded thermoplastic. However, when a tear seam is in-molded in such a substrate, a potential problem occurs that is known as read-through. In read-through, the narrowed thickness of the substrate at the in-molded seam causes visible distortion in the form of a groove on the Class A surface that forms during cooling of the molded material. Therefore, secondary operations have been required such as either 1) laser scoring or milling to cut a pre-weakened seam in the Class B surface that cannot be seen from the Class A surface, or 2) allowing the read-through to occur but then covering the instrument panel substrate with an outer skin layer to hide the read-through seam. The secondary operations increase manufacturing and/or material costs.
Another issue relating to conventional chute assemblies is the need to attach the chute to the instrument panel substrate. One common method to attach a chute has been vibration welding, but the known processes can be costly and it has been difficult to obtain a desired robustness of the attachment.
In one aspect of the invention, an automotive air bag system is provided for a vehicle. An instrument panel substrate comprises a first moldable thermoplastic characterized by a first melting temperature. The instrument panel substrate has a substantially smooth outer surface for facing a passenger compartment of the vehicle. A chute comprises a second moldable thermoplastic characterized by a second melting temperature lower than the first melting temperature. The chute includes an in-mold tear seam and a hinge for an air bag deployment door and a passageway for guiding an inflating air bag to the deployment door. The chute is attached to an inner surface of the instrument panel substrate by insert molding in which injection of the first moldable thermoplastic caused a partial melting of the second moldable thermoplastic.
Referring now to
As shown in
The construction as shown in
This visible seam line has prevented successful adoption of injection molding to manufacture an instrument panel substrate unless the tear seam is formed subsequent to molding of the parts as is depicted in
As shown in
An improved automotive air bag system of the invention is shown in
Chute 60 includes an in-mold tear seam 66 preferably extending around three sides of a deployment door 68 having a living hinge 67 extending along its remaining side. In-mold tear seam 66 has a tip extending toward instrument panel substrate 71. Deployment door 68 may preferably include a plurality of through holes 70 to receive injected material during formation of instrument panel substrate 71 so that the strength of attachment is improved. As described in more detail below, moldable thermoplastic flows into cavity 75 to provide a substantially smooth outer surface (i.e., a Class A surface against die section 77). The flowing thermoplastic fully covers in-mold tear seam 66 at a region 72 and flow through holes 70 to form tabs 73. The upward extension of the tip into instrument panel substrate 71 results in molding instrument panel substrate 71 with a narrowed thickness without a read-through defect on the smooth outer surface. Due to a particular relationship of melting temperatures discussed below, instrument panel substrate 71 and chute 60 become strongly bonded.
For obtaining a desired strength and appearance, instrument panel substrate 71 and chute 60 may be preferably formed of moldable thermoplastic materials. Preferred materials include thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO), Thermal Plastic Elastomers (TPE), and Thermal Plastic Elastomer Olefin (TEO). The most preferred material is TPO compounded with fillers that modify the material's melting temperature, flexural modulus (i.e., stiffness), and other properties. The compounded material used for forming chute 60 has a melting temperature lower than the melting temperature of the material injected to form instrument panel substrate 71. During injection of the moldable thermoplastic into cavity 75 for forming instrument panel substrate 71, partial melting of chute 60 occurs in order to produce a strong bond between the components. Without any secondary processing, both a tear seam and a smooth Class A surface are obtained.
In a most preferred embodiment, both chute 60 and substrate 71 are formed from compounded TPO. By providing different filler compositions and/or concentrations, different melting temperatures can be obtained. In addition, a different flexural modulus may typically result, wherein a higher melting temperature is accompanied by a higher flexural modulus (i.e., a stiffer material). To ensure that the deployment door operates with sufficient stiffness for proper airbag deployment, substrate 71 (which is the stiffer material) employs a TPO compound with a sufficiently high flexural modulus.
Fillers used in the moldable thermoplastics may include particles of rubber, talc, and/or glass. For example, an increasing concentration of rubber correspondingly lowers both the melting temperature and the flexural modulus.
In a preferred embodiment, the moldable thermoplastic material of chute 60 has a melting temperature of about of 380° F. The moldable thermoplastic utilized for substrate 71 preferably has a melting temperature of about 420° F. When the hotter substrate material is injected over the chute material, the outer surface of the chute material is at least partially melted and the materials bond to a depth of about 0.5 mm during the injection process.
As shown in
The smooth surface of the substrate is also useful for foam-in-place instrument panels since in some instances substrate defects can still be apparent through the foam and skin (e.g., the present invention can prevent read-through of defects that can result from defect-induced voids in the flow of the foam).
The more rigid (i.e., hard layer) of TPO over the top of the insert-molded TPO chute of the invention provides a rigid door construction. A further benefit of the rigid door construction is the reduction of “oil canning” which is an in and out movement caused when an occupant presses against the instrument panel. Moreover, the rigid door construction improves transfer of energy from the air bag to the substrate resulting in a cleaner opening of the door.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5533748 | Wirt et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536037 | Cherry | Jul 1996 | A |
5738366 | Phillion | Apr 1998 | A |
6789816 | Mar et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7007970 | Yasuda et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7291301 | Cowelchuk et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7405008 | Domine et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7458604 | Hier et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7914039 | Mazzocchi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8181987 | Mazzocchi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20030011174 | Merrifield et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030189321 | Takahashi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040126532 | Gardner, Jr. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050269804 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070187930 | Chitteti et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080038569 | Evans et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080128943 | Hager | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136146 | Kong | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100090367 | Kong | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100187722 | Fiammengo | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100295275 | Yeon et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110115201 | Best et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110123739 | Ciplijauskas et al. | May 2011 | A1 |