The invention relates to an inserter for inserting an item into a holder and, more particularly, to control of movement of the holder in the inserter.
Conventional mail piece inserter designs include a gripper chain, a mechanical index box, and a simple constant rotational speed AC motor that powers the system. In such devices, the gripper chain is driven fifty percent (50%) of the cycle and is stopped fifty percent (50%) of the cycle. When the gripper chain is stopped, the envelope is prepared (grippers open, insertion cups open the envelope, and the fingers are inserted), and then the mail piece item (e.g., collation) is inserted. The gripper chain is stopped the same amount of time (fifty percent of the cycle) whether the inserter is inserting a collation having the minimum depth collation (such as 3.7 inches, for example) or the maximum depth collation (such as 9.5 inches, for example). Thus, in conventional inserters, when inserting a collation smaller than the maximum size collation (9.5 inches in the example above), there is a wasted portion of the cycle when the gripper chain is stopped after the collation has been inserted, and prior to the beginning of the next cycle.
There is a desire to provide an apparatus and method which allows for either faster throughput when the inserter is being used with collations smaller than the maximum size collation, and/or which allows for slower operating speeds of the gripper chain when the inserter is being used with collations smaller than the maximum size collation.
In the following description, certain aspects and embodiments of the present invention will become evident. It should be understood that the invention, in its broadest sense, could be practiced without having one or more features of these aspects and embodiments. It should also be understood that these aspects and embodiments are merely exemplary.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, an inserter apparatus for inserting an item into a holder is provided. In one embodiment, the holder comprises an envelope. Other types of holders may also be used. The inserter apparatus includes a deck, a mover, an opening system, and a controller. The deck can slidably support the holder from a first location to an item loading location (e.g., insertion area). The mover can move the holder along the deck, wherein the mover includes a drive motor, a conveyor connected to the drive motor, and a gripper connected to the conveyor. The drive motor is a servo motor. In one embodiment, the servo motor is a position-based servo motor. Other types of servo motors may also be used. The opening system is at the item loading location for opening the holder and inserting the item into the holder. The controller is connected to the servo motor. The controller is adapted to vary speed of the servo motor to thereby vary speed of the conveyor and the holder along the deck.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of controlling insertion of an item into a holder in an inserter apparatus is provided comprising determining an insertion time for inserting the item into the holder at an item loading location, wherein the inserter apparatus comprises a conveyor which moves the holder to the item loading location, and wherein the conveyor stops while the item is being loaded into the holder at the item loading location; and varying a) the time during which the conveyor is stopped at the item loading location and/or b) the speed of the conveyor while the conveyor is moving, by controlling a servo motor drive connected to the conveyor based at least partially upon the determined insertion time.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of controlling sequential insertion of items into holders, respectively, in an inserter apparatus, wherein the inserter apparatus comprises a conveyor that sequentially moves the holders to an item loading location, and wherein the conveyor stops while each of the items is being sequentially inserted into each of the respective holders at the item loading location is provided. The method comprises determining a time duration for a stop of the conveyor for full insertion of one of the items into one of the holders at an item loading location; moving the conveyor, stopping the conveyor for the time duration, and repeating the moving and stopping, wherein moving the conveyor comprises moving a servo motor connected to the conveyor; and controlling the speed of the servo motor to at least partially control movement of the conveyor.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a program storage device is provided which is readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine for performing operations to control movement of an envelope in an inserter apparatus, the operations comprising determining an insertion time for inserting an item into the envelope at an item loading location; and varying movement of an envelope conveyor of the inserter apparatus by controlling a servo motor drive connected to the envelope conveyor based upon the determined insertion time.
Aside from the structural and procedural arrangements set forth above, the invention could include a number of other arrangements, such as those explained hereinafter. It is to be understood that both the foregoing description and the following description are exemplary only.
The foregoing aspects and other features of the invention are explained in the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
Period 12 corresponds to the portion of the cycle during which the gripper chain is required to be stopped for insertion of the maximum size collation allowed by the inserter into the envelope. As shown in
Thus, the period indicated at 18 is a wasted portion of the cycle in which the gripper chain is not moving, even though the insertion of the smaller size collation has been completed. This wasted portion of the cycle exists in conventional inserters because a simple AC motor is used at a constant velocity to drive the gripper chain. In addition, operators accept the inefficiency in exchange for the flexibility to easily vary the size of the collations.
Referring now to
In the illustrated embodiment, the apparatus 20 is a mail inserter apparatus adapted to insert an item, such as a collation 22 of documents, into a holder, such as an envelope 24. However, features of the invention could be used in any suitable type of inserter apparatus. The collation 22 has a depth “D,” as shown in
The apparatus 20 may also include a user input 38 for a user to input information or select settings for the controller 36. The apparatus 20 also includes a conventional collation assembly section 40, which assembles the collations 22. The collation assembly section 40 comprises a movable deck for feeding the collations 22 towards the collation loading location 30, as indicated by the arrow 42. The apparatus 20 also includes a conventional envelope supply section 44. The envelope supply section 44 includes an envelope shuttle 46 for feeding individual envelopes from the supply section 44 to the mover 32. However, in alternate embodiments, any suitable type of item supply and holder supply may also be used.
The deck 26 is adapted to slidably support an envelope 24 from a supply location 28 at the shuttle 46 to a collation loading location 30, and subsequently off of the deck 26. The mover 32 generally comprises a drive motor 48, a conveyor 50, and a gripper 52. The conveyor 50 comprises a gripper chain in the form of a loop. However, in alternative embodiments, any suitable type of conveyor for moving the gripper 52 may be used. The gripper 52 comprises a plurality of gripper jaws attached to the gripper chain 50. The gripper jaws are adapted to open and close to grip onto ends of the envelope 24. Multiple pairs of gripper jaws are provided on the gripper chain 50 at spaced locations for greater throughput of the envelopes 24 for one revolution of the gripper chain loop.
The drive motor 48 shown in
Referring also to
The transmission 56 includes an index box 60 adapted to stop and start movement of the chain sprocket 54 even though the motor 48 might still be rotating. In this embodiment, the transmission 56 also connects the motor 48 with a cam cluster (not shown) to run the grippers and the envelope shuttle as indicated by connection 63. The transmission 56 comprises a right angle box 61 for this purpose. However, in alternative embodiments, this connection may not be provided, such as, when the grippers and/or the envelope shuttle are powered by alternative drives. Alternatively, any suitable connection between the cam cluster and the motor could be provided.
As shown in
The grippers 52 release the envelope during insertion of the collation 22 into the envelope. With the grippers 52 released, the pusher 72 inserts the collation 22 into the envelope. The grippers 52 then re-grip the envelope and the opening system 34 is disengaged. The mover 32 then moves the assembled envelope and collation downstream along the deck 26. The larger the depth D of the collation, the longer it takes to insert the collation into an envelope. For example, it takes longer to insert a collation have a depth D of 9.5 inches into an envelope than a collation having a depth D of 4.4 inches.
Referring to
With this implementation of the invention, the throughput of the envelopes and collations, for collations having less than the maximum size, is the same as a conventional inserter. However, the maximum speed of movement of the gripper chain 50 during the cycle is reduced and the duration of movement of the gripper chain 50 during a cycle is lengthened. This is done without lengthening the duration of the cycle versus the duration of the cycle in the conventional inserter shown in
As seen in
As shown in
In the embodiment described above, reliability of an inserter may be improved by reducing the speed of the gripper chain without reducing the throughput of the inserter. If the stop time is reduced as noted above, the speed of the gripper chain can be reduced without increasing the total cycle time. The chain speed can be lowered since the motion is over a greater percentage of time of the cycle (now more than fifty percent of the cycle). This may apply to inserters having a 7-inch or 14-inch pusher spacing, for example.
In some embodiments, the invention may provide a method to improve reliability of a mail inserting system and/or optimize insertion throughput on a mail inserting system. This may be accomplished by using a servo motor to drive the gripper chain and by adapting the controller to control the servo motor. The transmission between the drive motor and the gripper chain may also be adapted/modified, if desired.
In one embodiment, throughput may be increased by changing the amount of time during a cycle in which the gripper chain is stopped. The throughput would not be changed for the largest size depth collations. However, the throughput could be increased for any collations smaller than the largest possible depth collation. When using a servo motor to drive the gripper chain, the movement profile of the gripper chain may be altered, such that the stop time is based on collation depth and envelope preparation time. This is the minimum time (i.e., percentage of cycle) that the gripper chain is required to be stopped. Thus, for collations having depths smaller than the largest possible collation depth, the insertion time (e.g., when the gripper chain is stopped) can be less than fifty percent of the cycle. The smaller stop time (i.e., for collations smaller than the largest possible collation) may increase the throughput for the inserter. This is illustrated in the chart shown in
As shown in
In another embodiment, reliability may be improved by reducing the speed of the gripper chain movement and throughput may simultaneously be increased by making the total cycle time shorter. Thus, the slower speed of the gripper chain and a shorter total cycle time are not mutually exclusive features.
The invention may be used to change the insertion ratio during a cycle from the customary 1:1 insertion ratio (e.g., stop time:movement time) to a different ratio, such as 1:1.2 for example. Changing the insertion ratio may provide several advantages, such as reduced speed and reduced forces on the mechanics and improve improved reliability, such as at 14,000 collation/hour speed, for example. In addition, with an altered insertion ratio profile, the inserter speed may be raised, such as to 16,000 Collations/Hour in a 14 inch pusher spacing for a 6″×9″ envelope with a half fold, for example. Further, there may be no requirement for a change over between 7-inch and 14-inch pusher spacing. The invention may operate with a 7-inch and 14-inch pusher spacing, or may be left in 14-inch mode only. Finally, embodiments of the invention may operate with an inserter having two, three, or four overhead pushers.
An inserter according to embodiments of the invention may be designed with one servo motor or with two or more servo motors. A one-motor version has been described above with reference to
Referring also to
Referring also to
For example, in one embodiment, the controller 36 comprises a lookup table for determining the insertion time based upon a selection by the user at the input 38 of the size of the collation 22 and/or the size of the envelope 24. This determination is used to determine period 12 or 14. The controller 36 is then programmed to select the speed and duration of the movement 10 or 10′ (see
Alternatively, or additionally, the controller 36 may be programmed to increase the throughput of the envelopes and collations based upon the determined period being less than period 12. Thus, as illustrated by block 88 in
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure and methodology described herein. Thus, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the examples discussed in the specification. Rather, the present invention is intended to cover modifications and variations.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/962,804, filed Dec. 21, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,930,869.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2325455 | Williams | Jul 1943 | A |
4091596 | Jones | May 1978 | A |
4634107 | Vandersyde et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4903456 | Meur | Feb 1990 | A |
4987547 | Rabindran et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5327701 | Dronsfield | Jul 1994 | A |
5467577 | Sato | Nov 1995 | A |
5518228 | Bodie et al. | May 1996 | A |
5561962 | Everhard et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5926391 | Qutub et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5941516 | Emigh et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949687 | Emigh et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6164046 | Werner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168008 | Sting et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6601364 | Sussmeier | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6802504 | DePoi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
20020112453 | Rivenbark et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030182899 | Sting et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050072127 | Botschek et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060218877 | Brauneis et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090000098 | Campbell | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
267608 | May 1988 | EP |
2284793 | Jun 1995 | EP |
1332891 | Aug 2003 | EP |
05035030 | Feb 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110203224 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11962804 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 13075206 | US |