This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. §371 of PCT/EP2009/001583, filed Feb. 25, 2009, and published as WO 2009/106364 A1 on Sep. 3, 2009, which claims priority to German Application No. 10 2008 010 848.0, filed Feb. 25, 2008, which applications and publication are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof in their entirety, and the benefit of priority of each of which is claimed herein.
The invention relates to an insertion device for coins for transferring into a coin tester or a coin-operated machine.
Frequently coin testers are preceded by so-called slot barriers, which are situated in automatic machines, such as parking, ticket or vending machines or the like, so as to produce a certain spatial separation in order to obviate manipulation and vandalism. However, it has been shown that, due to the introduction of wire or strips of paper through the slot as far as the coin testers, the desired aim has not been achieved.
An insertion device is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,404,986 which attempts to suppress manipulation and destruction. This device has an insertion slot, a return slot situated thereunder and a rotatable disc in which a segment is recessed for receiving coins. In the region of the housing parts surrounding the disc, sensors and detectors are provided, which test the properties of a coin received in the recessed region, for example the diameter or the alloy. In the inoperative position, the disc is disposed such that the recessed region is situated behind the insertion slot and can receive a coin. If a coin is inserted and is detected via corresponding light barriers, a motor rotates the disc by a specific angle range, it being decided, taking into account the sensor and detector signals, whether the coin should be accepted. If this is the case, the disc rotates further until the coin falls out of the recessed region into a corresponding cashbox or the like. If the coin is not accepted, then the disc rotates in the other direction until the recessed region corresponds to the return slot.
In the case of such a known device, it occurs however in addition that manipulation attempts are undertaken, for example foreign objects, such as paper, wire or the like are introduced which impair the mode of operation of the device and block the coin channels.
The object therefore underlying the invention is to produce an insertion device for coins for transferring into a coin tester or a coin-operated machine, with which device the possibility of manipulation is reduced.
This object is achieved according to the invention by the characterising features of the main claim in conjunction with the features of the preamble.
Advantageous developments and improvements are possible due to the measures indicated in the sub-claims.
As a result of the fact that the drum or disc, which has the receiving region for coins, is essentially covered by a flap which must be opened in a controlled manner in an ejection position, it is possible to eject foreign material, also compressible objects, e.g. folded or compressed paper, being able to fall out through the flap opening, which objects otherwise would not be able to be removed and would lead to blockage of the entire device. The introduction device mentioned also as slot barrier with drum has a “self-cleaning” configuration, i.e. the control unit for controlling the coin insertion and transfer process detects via sensors or the motor current of the drive motor whether foreign bodies, such as paper, card, metal sheets or the like, are present or stuck for example in the slot region or entirely or partially in the receiving region of the drum and controls the drum in its movement such that it travels several times in both directions via the ejection position, as a result of which the flap covering the drum opens wide in the direction of gravity and thus, in most cases, the foreign bodies are removed again at the bottom or, because of the movement of the drum and of the flap, through the insertion slot, to the exterior. In this way, many service occasions, in the case of which specialist personnel must go to the positions of the automatic machine in order to remove foreign bodies form the insertion device, are avoided. Furthermore, destruction to the subsequently connected coin tester is avoided.
It is particularly advantageous that the flap is connected to an opening mechanism which is configured for example as a curved path provided on the drum and as a lever arrangement connected to the flap. Due to this forced control via the curve-controlled mechanism, the flap can be opened wide during rotation of the drum without additional drives and the opening mechanism is economical to produce.
Preferably, the flap is equipped with a return spring which is under pre-tension and by means of which it can be returned to the closed position.
It is advantageous that, in the region of the insertion slot, a detection sensor is disposed for establishing the approach of a coin and, as a function of a signal of the detection sensor, the drum can be rotated from an inoperative position in which the insertion slot is closed into the receiving position. In this way, the insertion slot is always closed in the inoperative state, as a result of which the insertion or introduction of foreign objects in precisely this inoperative position is prevented. Hence, an effective slot barrier is made available.
Furthermore, position sensors for detecting the position of the drum are advantageously provided, these being configured, in an advantageous embodiment, as light barriers and/or as Hall sensor arrangements. The light barrier offers the possibility in addition of detecting objects, in particular foreign objects, which do not fall or roll out in the output position, such as e.g. paper.
Advantageously, a sensor is provided for detecting the position of the flap, which sensor can be configured for example as a bifurcated light barrier since blockages and manipulation attempts can hence be diagnosed.
One embodiment of the invention is represented in the drawing and is explained in more detail in the subsequent description. There are shown:
The insertion device represented in
The insertion device comprises a series of sensor arrangements. Thus, a Hall sensor 12 is disposed on the circuit board 8 (see
In an ejection position of the drum 4 in which the receiving region 9 essentially points downwards, foreign bodies present in the receiving region 9 can fall out at the bottom. When moving into the ejection position, the flap 10 is actuated with forced control at the same time by an opening mechanism (see
In the front part 1, a coil 19 is disposed, which coil surrounds the coin insertion slot 2 and is screened by a screening plate 21 against external disruptions. It represents a detector for coins approaching the insertion slot 2.
In
As stated already, the position of the drum 4 is detected via the light barrier and the Hall sensor 12. In the output position corresponding to
If the coil 19 detects a further coin to be inserted, the drum 4 is rotated further since this is the shortest path to the insertion slot 2 and moves into the ejection position. The coin receiving region 9 is thereby opened at the bottom by lifting the flap 10 from the drum 4, as a result of which any foreign objects or extraneous material possibly present can fall out, the flap 10 being opened wide by the curved path 16 on the drum rear-side connected to the lever system 17, which is represented in
As long as a coin is not detected in the coil region, i.e. at the insertion slot 2, the drum 4 is rotated out of the output position at the coin outlet 7 in an anti-clockwise direction into the inoperative position. As stated already, the drum 4 is rotated out of the inoperative position into the coin receiving position in an anti-clockwise direction in order that the slot opening is released from the top to the bottom and the waiting coin falls into the receiving region 9 of the drum 4.
It can be detected in
If foreign bodies are introduced, which lead to locking of the rotation, the control unit stops the transmission motor 5 as a result of monitoring the motor current which increases during locking and the drum 4 is moved in the opposite direction of rotation. It is ensured by the relatively large spacing between drum edge and the lower slot edge in the front 1 that foreign bodies, which protrude somewhat out of the drum region after introduction, do not become jammed during rotation of the drum in the direction of the foreign money shaft. In particular paper is pushed back into the slot region during rotation and is pulled through the shaft between the drum and front during ejection. The control unit preferably allows a control programme to run in which the motor not only changes its direction once upon an increase in current, but a change in the direction of rotation takes place several times and hence also multiple opening of the flap 10, by means of which blockages are eliminated. Of course, this control programme of the multiple change in direction of rotation can also be implemented with corresponding flap openings if foreign bodies are detected by the light barrier(s).
In order to avoid damage to the motor, an overload coupling is provided and, upon locking of the drum 4 and too high an increase in current, is disengaged.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 010 848 | Feb 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/001583 | 2/25/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/29/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/106364 | 9/3/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4842120 | Dobbins et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5088587 | Goodrich et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5404986 | Hossfield et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5429222 | Delay | Jul 1995 | A |
5513738 | Hird et al. | May 1996 | A |
5573100 | Vergne et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5596630 | Hsu | Jan 1997 | A |
5713451 | Masse | Feb 1998 | A |
5829569 | Cheng et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5887053 | McGough | Mar 1999 | A |
5915519 | Glaser | Jun 1999 | A |
6050388 | Gautherot | Apr 2000 | A |
6786408 | Yamagishi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7635059 | Bruner et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7735622 | String | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20040045788 | Dobbins et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050224313 | Hilton et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 08 254 | Sep 1994 | DE |
0 609 923 | Aug 1994 | EP |
WO-03056522 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Application No. PCT/EP2009/001583, International Search Report mailed Jun. 4, 2009”, 7 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110130084 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |