This application is a national stage application of the earlier PCT Patent Application to Horacio Davila Moreno entitled “Insole-Sock Insert for Footwear,” application number PCT/MX2018/000072, filed on Feb. 14, 2018, which application claims priority to Mexican Patent Application to Horacio Davila Moreno entitled “Insole-Sock Insert for Footwear,” application number MX/u/2017/000369, filed on Feb. 14, 2017, the disclosures of each of which are hereby incorporated entirely herein by reference.
The present implementation, as is expressed in the title of this descriptive report, belongs to the field of foot inserts (insoles, socks, tines, amongst others) that are used for footwear. Particularly, we are referring to an insole-sock type insert for shoes, with improvements in the configuration and usefulness, which gives advantages in comparison to other type of foot inserts, whether they be soles, inserts, socks, tines, amongst others.
Currently, there exists some types of inserts, insoles, loafers, socks and/or footwear that are distinguished for possessing unique characteristics, but they do not solve problems this implementation in this descriptive report solves. Following, there is a state of the art report.
There are references of insole-sock type footwear made within the patent US20110061148 with an international publication of the United States of America, which shows a sock built with an integrated insole where the sock forms a pocket in the lower part where the insole is located and sealed. The insole will be permanently located within the sock and could not be removed without destroying such configuration. The implementation could be improved, however, the patent does not consider other improvements and results are totally different with respect to configuration and technical advantage from the one described in this descriptive report.
We also mention American U.S. Pat. No. 6,336,227 B1 which describes a sock which is worn with a nautical type shoe which has a frontal section and heel section, which are connected by an intermediate section and also counts with elastomeric strips. In reality, it is a traditional sock but formed with distinct materials and has a distinct knit between them and each one of the section mentioned.
The Spanish patent with application number 200101632 is also mentioned, which describes a perfected sock characterized because it presents a second layer within the knit of the foot's sole that jointly defines with that one a cavity fitted with an opening for the introduction of an insole inside, being impossible to remove such insole with respect to the foot.
We also found in Espacenet the publication of the Chinese patent with publication number CN2907274 (Y)—Jun. 6, 2007. This patent describes a sock and traditional insoles, both with a sealing component (for example, hook and loop fasteners) where upon making contact with one another they remain fixed. To separate them, more force is needed.
Up to this point, the corresponding assessment of the state of the art in regards to the technique of the implementations described herein (and others from the state of the art) shows that there were changes made to the configuration and to the materials used; but, there is still some disadvantages that exist when there is daily use given to these types of implementations, since they are not easy to use, cause the feeling of foot confinement and compression, besides the fact that there has not been a design made with a new configuration that includes the insole as a sock for the comfort of the user.
Currently, there is a big trend toward the “sockless look”, which has given way to the creation of different types of socks, insoles, and sock inserts amongst other items in order to eliminate or reduce certain discomfort or disadvantages when socks are not worn.
Usually, there should be an effort made on behalf of the user in order to wear such products, which becomes even more complicated with elderly adults or those that are disabled, for example, they intend to wear these types of items for shoes. The implementation described in this descriptive report pertains to the type of implementation that gives the user a product with an ergonomic “sockless look” for its daily use, with an innovative design and/or functional structure technique.
The implementation is outlined below, mentioning the problems resolved, the advantages in its use, its configuration and other relevant characteristics that achieve a high degree of novelty and inventiveness.
The present utility model describes an insole-sock type insert for shoes, which presents a functional technical configuration which provides advantages and functionalities that are superior to other type of insoles, socks, foot inserts, loafers, short socks, sock inserts, and/or any other type of shoe or garment.
Amongst the useful improvements or advantages of the implementation, the following was found: novelty integration of an insole (traditional implant, incomplete or modified) and a short sock of a variable size (by saying “short sock” we will understand it as referring to “short, medium, or modified sock”) as just one product, where the sock and the insole show significant change for greater comfort, usefulness, and fit; better manipulation of the sock due to the fact that it is adhered to the insole (at a different height, depending on the length of the short sock) on just one axis; free mobility for the foot of the user due to the fact that the sock remains loose or is free from the insole, in other words, the sock takes the form of the foot and moves as the user moves his own foot; it is a washable product; adjustable to the insole, subject-matter of this implementation, within a determined size range, for example: insole-sock insert for shoe sizes 5-7 (Mexican), which will preferably have a frontal section of the insole that could be cut down if necessary in order to be used as an insole-sock for shoe sizes 5, 5½, 6, 6½, or leave it in the original size form the fabric to be used with size 7, depending on the manner in which the size range is established, or it could be handled as a one size fits all. Our implementation counts with other improvements that are specified below.
It deals with an original configuration and design which consists of an insole, which has attached on the partial or total extension of itself a short, medium, or modified sock; a short, medium, or modified sock, partially attached to the insole on one axis, remaining loose or free from the front part of the insole where the toes go, the frontal foot's instep and sole, depending on the size of the sock, that is short, medium, or modified; and a holding device between the insole and the short, medium, or modified sock, which allows for the attachment of both up to a certain point, where such holding device is a seam, a hook and loop fastener type joint, an adhesive or any other type of method that allows for the same function.
The short sock only covers the front part of the foot (toes, front part of the arch and front part of the foot) and is attached to the insole on just one axis at a medium height. The distance of the point of attachment of which the short sock attaches with the insole, can vary depending on the type of insole-sole type insert which will be tailored, since certain footwear needs a sock that that has to be in the front part of the insole (such as is the case for women, “ballerina type”), and for others, the sock should practically cover half or more of the insole if used with sneakers, nautical shoes, amongst others. In other words, the distance with which the sock and the insole are attached may vary depending on the type of footwear, since one of the primary functions is to obtain an insole-sock type insert that upon being used creates the impression that socks are not being worn, given the sock-less look.
The insole plays an important role in our implementation, since it presents different modalities: 1. Traditional size insoles; 2. Modified insoles with variable configurations in such a manner that they show empty spaces in smaller sections than the total area of the insole, with these mainly being within the front part but also being able to be present throughout the majority of it, with only the contour remaining (forming a frame with a variable thickness perimeter), as well as having crossed lines with a variable thickness between such spaces of the same material as the insole in order to create firmness and stability to the structure of the insole; and 3. Incomplete insoles with a variable distance, being very useful for us its rear part (half where the heel is located). For descriptive reasons with respect to the implementation the three types of the previously mentioned insoles will be defined as: Traditional insole, modified insole, and incomplete insole, respectively.
The traditional and modified insoles are of a manually adjustable size, cutting part of the insole in order to reduce the corresponding shoe size. Such cut can be made in the frontal or rear part, depending on the insole configuration. The incomplete insole, upon not having the traditional front part of an insole, therefore, it does not require to be cut, it is adjusted without any problem to the footwear being used, since the foot of the user will define the longitude of the short sock upon wearing it.
The incomplete insole, when required, uses any type of system or mechanism in order to avoid it from moving or slipping towards the front of the shoe. This effect can happen upon using this type of insole-sock type insert for shoes.
One of the major advantages of the modified and incomplete insole is that these configurations allow for a greater space or fit for the user's foot, in comparison with the traditional type insole (complete insole). Likewise, any approach of the insole-sock type insert for shoes can be used with such a configuration that prevents that the short sock moves outward (towards the rear part of the insole) once the foot of the user is removed from the sock.
As an additional characteristic, the insole of any approach of the implementation has its own extension, a flap or wing on each side, at variable distance, design, and size, of the same or different material than the insole, that upon being in contact with the sock, allows that the sock keeps an opening in order to facilitate the introduction of the user's foot.
Also, the implementation deals with a certain type of modular insert when using a temporary attachment device of the traditional, incomplete, or modified insole with the short sock, such as in the case of the hook and loop fastener type system.
The purpose of this implementation will be better understood with the help of the following description based on a practical performance example; this description was made in compliance with the attached drawings:
By making reference to these figures, as described below in a more detailed manner and with different approaches of the implementation.
In
In
Within
Similarly to
Image 12 shows an approach that uses a short sock (2), which only covers the user's toes and a modified insole (1) with the same configuration that can be seen in iv) of
Additionally,
In
Also, there are certain advantages and benefits that arise from the current implementation, such as the resolution to problems in regards to bad odor when it is worn to give the sockless look. The foot friction problem is also resolved in regards to causing blisters and calluses when in direct contact with footwear. It should be considered that the insole-sock type insert for shoes is a product that can be washed without altering the functional and technical combination of the structure that is described in this report.
The present implementation is better used in nautical type shoes or those of the similar type; however, the present implementation fulfills the functions described in this report when used in any type of footwear.
It should be understood that what is shown here is merely illustrative of current preferential approaches of the implementation and that there are no limitations due to the details of the manufacture or design in this document, other than the description made in the enclosed claims. The modifications which may result after taking into account the present descriptive report are included, as well as the different uses that can occur in addition to those mentioned herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MX/u/2017/000369 | Aug 2017 | MX | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/MX2018/000072 | 8/14/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/035706 | 2/21/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1501349 | Jung, Jr. | Jul 1924 | A |
1805035 | Branley | May 1931 | A |
2482333 | Everston | Sep 1949 | A |
2776500 | Gonsalves | Jan 1957 | A |
3334356 | Abel | Aug 1967 | A |
4813162 | Harris | Mar 1989 | A |
5259126 | Rosen | Nov 1993 | A |
5469641 | Subotic | Nov 1995 | A |
5473781 | Greenberg | Dec 1995 | A |
5867838 | Corry | Feb 1999 | A |
6336227 | Li | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6393620 | Hatch et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
9839259 | Arquilla | Dec 2017 | B2 |
11129442 | Arquilla | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20020000002 | Hatch et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20050011083 | Kosted | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070283598 | Gray | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080250669 | Hallivis | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20160128427 | Meghani | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2017003275 | Jan 2017 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200260822 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |